Post on 07-Apr-2018
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
1/13
The Effects of Population
Growth on Land UseIn an article in Yale Universitys Environment 360, Jonathan Foley,
Director of theInstitute of the Environment, University of Minnesota,
argues that the global community now faces a crisis in land use and
agriculture that could undermine the health, security, and
sustainability of our civilization. While climate change has received
enormous attention (rightfully, Foley argues), human population
growth, and the corresponding rising global demand for meat anddairy products, as well as the growing need for bioenergy from corn,
sugarcane, and other sources should be equal cause for concern.
We are putting tremendous pressure on the worlds resources.
With 70 million new people per year, Foley argues, if we want any
hope of keeping up with these demands, well need to double,
perhaps triple, the agricultural production of the planet in the next
30 to 40 years.
Foley said meeting the agricultural needs of a growing global
population is difficult enough, but, at the same time, countries
must meet growing food production needs while mitigating the
effects of agricultural production on land-based ecosystems.
Already, we have cleared or converted more than 35 percent of the
earths ice-free land surface for agriculture, whether for croplands,
pastures or rangelands. In fact, the area used for agriculture is nearly
60 times larger than the area of all of the worlds cities and suburbs.
Since the last ice age, nothing has been more disruptive to the
planets ecosystems than agriculture.
Agricultural puts pressure on lands, but also on water systems.
Across the globe, we already use a staggering 4,000 cubic
kilometers of water per year, withdrawn from our streams, rivers,
http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2196http://environment.umn.edu/http://environment.umn.edu/http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=21968/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
2/13
lakes and aquifers. Of this, 70 percent is used for irrigation, the
single biggest use of water, by far, on the globe. As a result, many
large rivers have greatly reduced flows and some routinely dry up.
And the extraction of water from deep groundwater reserves is
almost universally unsustainable, and has resulted in rapidly
declining water tables in many regions of the world. Future water
demands from increasing population and agricultural consumption
will likely climb between 4,500 and 6,200 cubic kilometers per year,
hugely compounding the impacts of climate change, especially in
arid regions.
Not only are water and land resources put under stress, but current
agricultural practices create pollution. Agriculture, particularly theuse of industrial fertilizers and other chemicals, has fundamentally
upset the chemistry of the entire planet. Already, the use of
fertilizers has more than doubled the flows of nitrogen and
phosphorus compounds in the environment, resulting in widespread
water pollution and the massive degradation of lakes and rivers.
Excess nutrient pollution is now so widespread, it is even
contributing to the disruption of coastal oceans and fishing grounds
by creating hypoxic dead zones, including one in the Gulf ofMexico. Another form of pollution results from current agricultural
and land use practices: C02 emissions. According to Foley, current
practices, including clearing forests for agricultural land, contribute
30 percent of the currently unsustainable C02 emission levels.
Foley points to a few possible solutions: invest in revolutionary
agricultural practices, a new greener agricultural revolution; and
improve agricultural production while also mitigating environmental
impacts. Foley says there is room for hope. In recent years, for
example, U.S. farmers working with agricultural experts have
dramatically improved practices in the corn and soybean belt, cutting
down on erosion, nutrient loss, and groundwater pollution, even as
yields have continued to increase.
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
3/13
What Is Meant by LandUse Change?
Because of the vertical and horizontal heterogeneity of landscapes,researchers from many disciplines use land survey data. Zoologically
oriented landscape ecologists study the effects of horizontalheterogeneity on animal populations (Merriam, 1984; Forman,1982). Similarly, the data can be used to help answer a key questionfor humankind: Is the survival of groups of people essentiallydependent on landscape heterogeneity? Agriculture and other humanactivities imply it is.
Landscape ecology is concerned with the study of land or landscape,its form, function, and genesis (change). It looks at the factors
interacting at the earth's surface, including the physical, biological,and noospherical actions originated by humans. These factors formthree-dimensional phenomena that can be seen as horizontalpatterns of related elements (units of land) and as vertical patternsof land attributes, such as climate, rock, soil, water, and vegetation.The heterogeneity of these patterns is the main focus of landscapeecology.
A landscape is viewed as a holistic entity that is composed of avariety of relationships in a relatively steady state. The maintenance
of a steady state is called homeostasis, which refers to the set ofpositive and negative feedback factors that keep the system in adynamic equilibrium. The steady state may evolve into anothersteady state over time, but it is protected from strong fluctuations byfeedback factors (homeorhesis).
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
4/13
Population Pressure, Land
Tenure, and Natural Resource
Management
Massive degradation of natural resources, including forests,rangeland, and irrigation water, has been taking place in the
Third World. Its growing population has increased demandfor land, trees, and water, which, coupled with tenureinsecurity or the absence of clear property rights, hasresulted in the over-exploitation of these natural resources(e.g., Deacon 1994). This in turn has threatened thesustainable development of agriculture, forestry, andlivestock sectors. The critical question is whether the currenttrend will continue and result in further degradation ofnatural resources and, ultimately, the significantdeterioration of human welfare.
Boserup (1965) argued that population pressure need notresult in such disastrous consequences. Rather, she arguedthat it leads to the evolution of farming systems fromlandusing or natural resource-using systems, such asshifting cultivation, to land-saving and laborintensivefarming systems, such as annual cropping.1 Her argument,however, is incomplete: while she acknowledged that
investment is required to establish intensive farmingsystems (e.g., investment in the construction of irrigationfacilities, terracing, and tree planting), she paid insufficientattention to incentive systems which ensure that theappropriate nvestments are made. It is widely recognizedthat investment incentives are governed by the land tenure
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
5/13
or property rights institution, as it affects the expectedreturns to investments accrued to those who actuallyundertake them (Besley 1995). In sparsely populated areasof Sub-Saharan Africa and islands in the South Pacific, land
is often owned and controlled by the community whereindividual land rights are severely restricted and benefitsare shared widely among members of extended families(Johnson 1972). If such communal ownership of land prevailsand persists, investment incentives are likely to be weakand thus investments necessary for the intensification offarming systems may not be made (Besley 1995; Johnson1972). Then, the extensive and natural resource-using
farming systems may continue to be practiced, contrary tothe Boserupian hypothesis.
Hayami and Ruttan (1985) argued that not only technologiesbut also institutions change in order to save increasinglyscarce resources. This would imply in our context that landtenure institutions change toward individual ownership, soas to provide appropriate investment incentives to conserve
natural resources. Consistent with the induced innovationthesis, a theory of property rights institution developed byDemsetz (1967) and Alchian and Demsetz (1973) asserted,based on the historical experience of hunting communitiesin Canada, that property rights institutions evolve from openaccess to private ownership when natural resources becomescarce. In many parts of Sub-Saharan Africa, it is known thatthe system of communal property rights on cultivatedagricultural fields has been considerably individualized(Bruce and Migot-Adholla 1993). Yet, no systematic researchhas been made as to the effect of population pressure onland tenure or property rights institutions and the effect ofpossible changes in land tenure institutions on theinvestment in land improvement towards the intensification
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
6/13
of farming systems and the preservation of naturalresources.
Based on the recently completed project concerning land
tenure and the management of land and trees in Asia andAfrica (Otsuka and Place 2001), this paper attempts toidentify the process by which population pressure leads tothe individualization of land rights and its consequences onthe management of land and trees. Particular focus will beplaced on the development of agroforestry systems growingcommercial trees, such as cocoa, coffee, cinnamon, andrubber, which are becoming important farming systems in
agriculturally marginal areas, where people are particularlypoor and natural forests have degraded rapidly (Otsuka2000).2
The conceptual framework is discussed in the next section,which is followed by the examination of the results of casestudies on the management of trees and cropland. Policyimplications of this study are discussed in the final section.
The views expressed in this paper are the views ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the viewsor policies of the Asian Development Bank Institute(ADBI), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Boardof Directors, or the governments they represent.ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the dataincluded in this paper and accepts no responsibilityfor any consequences of their use. Terminology used
may not necessarily be consistent with ADB officialterms..
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
7/13
Population, Land Use, and the
Environment
As noted earlier in the course, agriculture employs a high proportion of people in the
Third World. In this section, we will look at population growth and agricultural
development, with a particular emphasis on how population growth results in changes in
land use and in utilization of the natural resource base.
The discussion begins with a brief look at the arguments of Boserup concerning induced
technological change in agriculture, and then focuses on Rosenzweig and Binswanger's
broader analysis of the effects of population growth on production relations in agriculture.
We'll conclude with an examination of two case studies: one from Zaire and the other
from Rwanda.
Population growth and production relations
in agriculture: Boserup and beyond
In considering how population growth influences agricultural development,
we begin by noting two points. First, adding more workers to a fixed
amount of agricultural land will, other things being equal, result in a
diminishing marginal product of labor (law of diminishing marginalreturns). Second, it is unlikely that other things will remain equal (i.e.,
unchanged).
More specifically, in our review of the National Research Council's 1986
report on population growth and economic development in the Third World,
we noted that counter to the various arguments that have been made
suggesting that there will be adverse effects of population growth, Ester
Boserup has stressed the notion that there will be positive effects as well.
Most notable in this regard is her view that population pressure on the land
will stimulate the search for and adoption of new technologies of
production. In essence, then, population growth induces technological
change, resulting in higher productivity of agricultural workers.
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
8/13
Boserup's Table 3.2 (overhead presented in class) shows various food
supply systems, arrayed in order of the frequency of cropping (i.e., the
intensity of land use). The shift from long-fallow to short-fallow systems
and then to annual cropping and multicropping is typically associated not
only with more intensive land use, but also with increasing populationdensity and technological sophistication in agricultural production.
Rosenzweig et al., in the context of a broad-ranging assessment of
production relations in agriculture, provide a concise summary of Boserup's
arguments regarding the effects of population growth on agriculture,
identifying eight principal consequences:
1. reduced fallow periods;
2. increased investment in land;
3. shift from hand-hoe cultivation to animal traction;
4. adoption of soil fertility maintenance via manuring;
5. reduced average cost of infrastructure;
6. encourages more specialization in production activities;
7. induces a change from general to specific land rights; and
8. reduced per capita availability of common property resources such as
forest, bush, and/or grass fallows and communal pastures.
The first four of these effects represent efforts to increase land productivity
and to offset the increased labor requirements stemming from more
intensive cultivation. The fifth and sixth effects are due to economies ofscale resulting from increased population density. The seventh effect
generates incentives to undertake investments in specific plots of land in
order to intensify production and preserve soil fertility. The eighth effect
raises the possibility of overutilization of common property resources (the
"tragedy of the commons").
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
9/13
Not only the intensity of agricultural production, but numerous other aspects
of production relations in agriculture are affected by population growth and
increased population density. This is best illustrated by Rosenzweig et al.'s
Table 4.1 (overhead presented in class), which shows how markets for land
and labor, credit markets, and various other aspects of production relationsin agriculture are likely to vary between land-abundant settings and land-
scarce economies.
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
10/13
Boserup and Bandundu: Case study #1
The Boserup induced-technological-change hypothesis, in which there is a
positive feedback from population growth and increased population density
to agricultural development, provides a basis for some optimism. My paper
on "Population Growth, Changing Agricultural Practices, and
Environmental Degradation in Zaire" presents a distinctly more pessimistic
view.
The paper focuses on the province of Bandundu, immediately to the east ofKinshasa. The population density in this predominantly rural province is
rather low (about 19 per square kilometer), and historically food production
has been via a long-fallow system of slash-and-burn agriculture.
Although there has been outmigration from Bandundu to Kinshasa, and
migration of rural residents to the province's urban areas, the rural
population has continued to grow. As the population has increased, more
and more land has come under cultivation. Often this has been more
marginal land, in terms of its capacity to produce food. This process, calledland extensification, in conjunction with growth in the demand for wood as
fuel, has contributed to deforestation.
Agricultural intensification, in the form of shortening of fallow periods, has
also been evident in Bandundu during the past 15-20 years. This
intensification was encouraged not only by population growth within the
province, but also by improved access to the Kinshasa market dating back to
the late 1970s when a major paved road linking the province to the capitalwas completed.
Thus, while some elements of the Boserup scenario are present in
Bandundu, a number of others are not. Indeed, work by Louise Fresco
documents that there have been additional changes in agricultural practices
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
11/13
designed to economize on labor (e.g., less care in field preparation) that
have had the impact of hastening soil erosion and loss of soil fertility.
There is potential for serious environmental degradation. The gradual
destruction of forest and its replacement by open savanna reduces soilfertility. Present practices entail what Dasgupta referred to as "mining" of
the soil (cf., his suggestion to use NNP, or Net National Product, which
would differ from GNP by taking into account the effects of changes in the
natural resource base on future consumption possibilities).
Overall, then, the situation in Bandundu appears to correspond to that
described by Lele and Stone in their examination of evidence from six
countries in sub-Saharan Africa: "the environmental damage from the
reduction of bush fallow, the more intensive use of land without
supplementary biological and chemical inputs, and the depletion of forestry
resources complicates the transition from low to more densely populated
areas as originally envisaged in the Boserup hypothesis."
The concern for the longer run, then, is that the increases in food production
that have been realized via intensification will not be sustainable over the
long haul. That is, it may not be possible to maintain agricultural yields.
Technology, in the form of improved inputs (high-yielding seeds, fertilizers,
pesticides) does exist that would allow maintenance of yields and even
further increases in food production. However, the debilitated state of
Zaire's economy and transportation infrastructure means that use of
improved inputs is not economically feasible. The long-term prospects,
then, are not at all appealing.
Demographic pressure in Rwanda: Case study #2
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
12/13
John May's short paper on "Demographic Pressure and Population Policies in
Rwanda, 1962-1994" highlights the fact that Rwanda's economic problems are
like those faced by other countries in sub-Saharan Africa, yet at the same time
more extreme. In large part this is a consequence of the fact that the population
density of 292 inhabitants per square kilometer means that Rwanda's density ismore than 12 times as high as that for all of sub-Saharan Africa.
Fertility has been very high in Rwanda, reaching a total fertility rate of 8.5 and
higher in the late 1970s and early 1980s (see May's Table 2). There is some
evidence of a decline during the 1990s, but fertility was still above 6 as of
1992. This high fertility, in conjunction with declining mortality, has resulted
in substantial population growth (see his Figure 1).
As shown by May's Table 3, this rapid population growth has beenaccompanied by distinct changes in land use. More land is being devoted to
crop production, while less has been available for pastures and fallow. As with
the Bandundu case study, these changes in land use raise serious questions
about environmental degradation and sustainability of food crop production
(cf., impact on mountain gorillas).
May reviews the various population policies that have been attempted over the
past 40 years, beginning with efforts by Belgium during the colonial period to
encourage emigration to neighboring countries such as Zaire. The closing ofborders after independence in the early 1960s ended this policy.
A second resettlement policy, "paysannats," was attempted in 1963, and
entailed resettling people to areas with land available for cultivation. This was
discontinued after only a short period because demand for participation
exceeded the available land.
Policy aimed directly at slowing demographic growth was initiated only in
1981, when the government launched a national family planning program.Although slow in getting started, this program appears to have contributed
(along with delays in marriages due to lack of land) to the modest declines in
fertility observed by the early 1990s. However, as mentioned earlier,
population growth remained high.
8/6/2019 The Effects of Population Growth on Land
13/13