Stability Analysis of Continuous-Time Switched Systems: A Variational Approach

Post on 02-Feb-2016

36 views 0 download

description

Stability Analysis of Continuous-Time Switched Systems: A Variational Approach. Michael Margaliot School of EE-Systems Tel Aviv University, Israel. Joint work with: Michael S. Branicky (CWRU) Daniel Liberzon (UIUC). Overview. Switched systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Stability Analysis of Continuous-Time Switched Systems: A Variational Approach

1

Stability Analysis of Continuous-Time

Switched Systems: A Variational Approach

Michael Margaliot

School of EE-Systems Tel Aviv University, Israel

Joint work with: Michael S. Branicky (CWRU)

Daniel Liberzon (UIUC)

2

Overview Switched systems Stability Stability analysis:

A control-theoretic approach A geometric approach An integrated approach

Conclusions

3

Switched Systems Systems that can switch between

several modes of operation.

Mode 1

Mode 2

4

Example 1

Switched power converter

100v 50vlinear filter

5

Example 2

A multi-controller scheme

plant

controller1

+

switching logiccontroller

2

Switched controllers are “stronger” than regular controllers.

6

More Examples

Air traffic controlBiological switchesTurbo-decoding……

For more details, see:

- Introduction to hybrid systems, Branicky

- Basic problems in stability and design of

switched systems, Liberzon & Morse

7

Synthesis of Switched Systems

Driving: use mode 1 (wheels)

Braking: use mode 2 (legs)

The advantage: no compromise

8

Gestalt Principle

“Switched systems are more than the

sum of their subsystems.“

theoretically interesting

practically promising

9

Differential Inclusions

A solution is an absolutely continuous function satisfying (DI) for almost all t.

Example:

{ ( ), ( )}, (DI)nx f x g x x R

( ) nx R

, (LDI)x Ax Bx

4 3 2 1 0( ) ...exp( )exp( )exp( )exp( )x t t A t B t A t B x

10

Global Asymptotic Stability (GAS)

Definition The differential inclusion

is called GAS if for any solution

(i)

(ii)

{ ( ), ( )}, ,nx f x g x x R

( )x tlim ( ) 0,t

x t

0, 0 such that:

| (0) | | ( ) | .x x t

11

The Challenge

Why is stability analysis difficult?

(i) A DI has an infinite number of solutions for each initial condition.

(ii) The gestalt principle.

12

Absolute Stability [Lure, 1944]

x Ax bu Ty c x

( , )y t

u y

2{ ( ) : 0 ( , ) }kS y y t ky y

ky

13

Absolute Stability

0.S

The closed-loop system:

( ). (CL)Tx Ax b c x

* min{ : s.t. CL is not stable}.kk k S

Absolute Stability Problem

Find

A is Hurwitz, so CL is asym. stable for

any

For CL is asym. stable for any*,k k .kS

14

Absolute Stability and Switched Systems

( )Tx Ax b c x

x Ax

( ) 0y ( )y ky

Tx Ax kbc x

* min{ : { , } is unstable}.Tk k x co Ax Ax kbc x

Absolute Stability Problem Find

15

Example0 1 0 0 0 1

, , , :2 1 1 1 2 1

TkA b c B A kbc

k

10x B xx Ax

16

A Solution of the Switched System

* 10.k This implies that

10 100.5 0.50.9 0.950(2.85) B BA Ax e e e e x

17

Although both and are

stable, is not stable.

Instability requires repeated switching.

x Ax 10x B x10{ , }x Ax B x

Two Remarks

18

Optimal Control ApproachWrite as the bilinear control

system:

{ , }kx Ax B x

( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ), ( ) [0,1]

(0) .kx t Ax t u t B A x t u t

x z

.x

u is the worst-case switching law (WCSL).

u .J Problem Find a control maximizing

Analyze the corresponding trajectory

2( ; , ) : | ( ; , ) | / 2.J u T z x T u zFix Define: 0.T

19

Optimal Control Approach

( ; , )J u T zConsider as :T

*k k

( ) 0J u

*k k

( )J u

*k kz

20

Optimal Control ApproachTheorem (Pyatnitsky) If then:(1) The function

is finite, convex, positive, and homogeneous (i.e. ).

(2) For every initial condition there exists a solution such that

( ) : lim sup ( ; , )T

V z J u T z

*k k

2( ) ( )V cz c V z

,zx

( ( )) ( ).V x t V z

21

Solving Optimal Control Problems

is a functional:

Two approaches:

1. Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB)

equation.

2. Maximum Principle.

2| ( ) |x T

( ) ( , [0, ])x T F u(t) t T

22

HJB Equation

Find such that

Integrating:

or

An upper bound for ,

obtained for the maximizing Eq. (HJB).

( , ( )) 0. (HJB)[0,1]

dMAX V t x t

dtu

( , ( )) (0, (0)) 0V T x T V x

2| ( ) | / 2x T

( , ) : nV R R R 2( , ) || || / 2,V T y y

u

2| ( ) | / 2 (0, (0)).x T V x

23

Margaliot & Langholz (2003) derived an

explicit solution for when n=2.

This yields an easily verifiable necessary and sufficient condition for stability of second-order switched linear systems.

( )V z

The Case n=2

24

The function is a first integral of if

We know that so

* ( ).kBH x( )AH x

V

( ( )) ( ),V x t V z

* *

0 ( ) ( ) 0

1 ( ) ( ) 0.

x

k x k

u x t Ax t V Ax

u x t B x t V B x

0 ( ( )) .A Ay

dH y t H Ay

dt ( ) ( ),y t Ay t

2:AH R R

Basic Idea

0 ( ( )).d

V x tdt

Thus, is a concatenation of two first integrals and

25

Example:

12

10A

10

1 2

72( ) exp( arctan( ))

27A T x

H x x P xx x

kx B x

Axx 1

1

12/1

2/12 kPkwhere and ...985.6* k

0 1

2 1kBk

1

1 2

7 42( ) exp( arctan( ))

27 4kB T

k

k xH x x P x

x xk

26

Thus,

→ an explicit expression for V (and an explicit solution of the HJB).

0AxH Ax 0A

xH Bx

x x max{ ( ) } 0ku

W Bx uW B A x

1

1 0BxH Bx 0B

xH Ax ( ) : 1W x

Axx x Bx

AxH

27

More on the Planar Case

[Margaliot & Branicky, 2009]

Corollary GAS of 2nd-order positive linear switched systems.

Theorem For a planar bilinear control system

1*( )x t

2*( )x t3 1*( ) *( )x t cx t

x Ax

x Bx

28

Nonlinear Switched Systems

where are GAS.

Problem Find a sufficient condition guaranteeing GAS of (NLDI).

1 2 { ( ), ( )} (NLDI)x f x f x1 2 ( ), ( )x f x x f x

29

Lie-Algebraic Approach

For simplicity, consider the linear

differential inclusion:

so

},{ BxAxx

2 1(t) ...exp( )exp( ) (0).x Bt At x

30

Commutation Relations and GAS

Suppose that A and B commute, i.e.AB=BA, then

Definition The Lie bracket of Ax and

Bx is [Ax,Bx]:=ABx-BAx.

Hence, [Ax,Bx]=0 implies GAS.

3 2 1

3 1 4 2

( ) ...exp( )exp( )exp( ) (0)

exp( (... )) exp( (... )) (0)

x t At Bt At x

A t t B t t x

31

Lie Brackets and Geometry

Consider

Then:

{ , , , }x Ax Ax Bx Bx

x Ax

x Axx Bx

x Bx

)0(x

)4( x

2 3

(4 ) (0) (0) (0)

[ , ] (0) ...

B A B Ax x e e e e x x

A B x

32

Geometry of Car Parking

This is why we can park our car.

The term is the reason this takes

so long.

2

)(xf

)(xg

],[ gf

33

Nilpotency

Definition k’th order nilpotency:

all Lie brackets involving k+1 terms vanish.

1st order nilpotency: [A,B]=0

2nd order nilpotency: [A,[A,B]]=[B,[A,B]]=0

Q: Does k’th order nilpotency imply GAS?

34

Known ResultsLinear switched systems:k = 2 implies GAS (Gurvits,1995).k’th order nilpotency implies GAS

(Liberzon, Hespanha, & Morse, 1999)(Kutepov, 1982)

Nonlinear switched systems:k = 1 implies GAS (Mancilla-Aguilar, 2000).An open problem: higher orders of k?

(Liberzon, 2003)

35

A Partial Answer

Theorem (Margaliot & Liberzon, 2004)

2nd order nilpotency implies GAS.

0)())(( ,0

0)())(( ,1(t)u~

txBAt

txBAtT

T

( ) ( ) ( ), Tm t t Cx t C A B

Proof By the PMP, the WCSL satisfies

Let

36

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( )[ , ] ( )

T T

T

m t t Cx t t Cx t

t C A x t

xBACuxAAC

xACxACm

TT

TT

]],,[[]],,[[

],[],[

0m ( )m t const

Then

1st order nilpotency

Differentiating again yields:

battm )(0m2nd order nilpotency up to a single switch in the WCSL.

37

Handling Singularity

If m(t)0, the Maximum Principle

does not necessarily provide enough

information to characterize the WCSL.

Singularity can be ruled out using

the notion of strong extremality

(Sussmann, 1979).

38

[[ , ], ] [[ , ], ] 0T Tm C A A x u C A B x

3rd Order Nilpotency

In this case:

further differentiation cannot be carried out.

39

3rd Order Nilpotency Theorem (Sharon & Margaliot, 2007) 3rd order nilpotency implies

Proof(1) Hall-Sussmann canonical system;(2) A second-order MP (Agrachev&Gamkrelidze).

40 0 ( ; , ) ( ;PC , ).R T U x R T x

40

Conclusions

Stability analysis is difficult. A natural and powerful idea is to consider the “most unstable” trajectory.

Switched systems and differential inclusions are important in various scientific fields, and pose interesting theoretical questions.

41

More info on the variational approach:

“Stability analysis of switched systems using variational principles: an introduction”, Automatica 42(12): 2059-2077, 2006.

Available online:

www.eng.tau.ac.il/~michaelm