Post on 29-Mar-2015
Slide 1 of 36
Modern Principles: Macroeconomics
Tyler Cowen
and Alex Tabarrok
Copyright © 2010 Worth Publishers • Modern Principles: Macroeconomics • Cowen/Tabarrok
Chapter 4
Price Ceilings and
Price Floors
Slide 2 of 36Slide 2 of 36
Introduction• In this chapter we learn how a
controlled price… Causes a single market to result in a
surplus or a shortage. Delinks some markets and links
others in ways that are counterproductive.
Slide 3 of 36Slide 3 of 36
Price Ceilings• Price controls create price ceilings when
the controlled price is below the market equilibrium price.
• Price ceilings create five important effects:1. Shortages
2. Reductions in product quality.
3. Wasteful lines and other search costs.
4. A loss from gains from trade.
5. A misallocation of resources.
• Let’s look at each of these in turn.
Slide 4 of 36Slide 4 of 36
Price Ceilings1. Shortages
Quantity
Price ($)
Demand
Supply
Market equilibrium
Controlled price(ceiling)
Quantity demanded at the controlled price
Quantity supplied at the controlled price
Shortage
Results:1.At the controlled price Qs < Qd
2.In 1973, there were shortages ofwool, copper, aluminum, vinyl,denim jeans, paper, …
Slide 5 of 36Slide 5 of 36
Price Ceilings2. Reductions in Product Quality
One way to evade the law is to cut quality. Examples from the 1970s:
• Books were printed on lower quality paper.
• 2" X 4" lumber shrank to 1⅝" X 3⅝"
• New automobiles were painted with fewer coats of paint.
Another way quality can fall is to cut service. Examples from the 1970s
• The full service gasoline state disappeared.*
• Gasoline stations would close whenever the owner wanted a break.
Slide 6 of 36Slide 6 of 36
Price Ceilings3. Wasteful Lines and Other Search Costs
Quantity
Price of gasoline
per gallon
Demand
Supply
Market equilibrium
Controlled price
(ceiling)
QdQs
Shortage
$3
$1
Total value ofwasted time
Willingness toPay for Qs
Per gallon time cost
Slide 7 of 36Slide 7 of 36
Price Ceilings3. Wasteful Lines and Other Search Costs
(cont.). Other search costs: other ways of paying for
gas. Corruption and bribes: this was not a big
problem in the U.S., but it is a huge problem in other countries.
• Unfortunately honesty doesn’t eliminate the shortage so people simply line up…earlier…and earlier…
• Time wasted by the buyer cannot be transferred to the seller. It is simply lost.
Slide 8 of 36Slide 8 of 36
Price Ceilings4. Lost Gains from Trade—mutually
profitable exchanges are forgone. Lost consumer surplus (CS)
Lost producer surplus (PS)
The total lost gains from trade = sum of the lost consumer surplus and lost producer surplus for all buyers and sellers.
All of this is shown in the next figure
priceSupply -price mequilibriuMarket PS =
price mequilibriuMarket -price Demand CS =
Slide 9 of 36Slide 9 of 36
Price Ceilings4. Lost Gains From Trade (cont.)
Quantity
Price of gasoline
per gallon
Demand
Supply
Market equilibrium
Controlled price
(ceiling)
QdQs
Shortage
$3
$1
Willingness toPay for Qs
Pm
Qm
Lost gains from trade(deadweight loss)= lost consumer surplus (CS)+ lost producer surplus (PS)
CS
PS
Slide 10 of 36Slide 10 of 36
Price Ceilings5. Misallocation of Resources
Prices give incentives to move resources from low valued uses to higher valued uses.
Price controls distort signals and eliminate incentives.
• Example: No matter how cold it gets, demanders of heating oil are prevented from bidding the price up. Result: There is no signal and no incentive
to ship oil to where it is needed most. Resources are misallocated across different
uses.
• Recall from chapter 2.
Slide 11 of 36Slide 11 of 36
Price Ceilings
Price of oil per barrel
Quantity of oil (MBD)
Demand
600 40
$20
20
$80
$140
0
$100
$120
$40
$60
80 100 120 140
Oil is used for lower valued uses at low prices
As its price rises, oil is transferred from lower valued uses to higher valued uses.
As its price rises, oil is transferred from lower valued uses to higher valued uses.
5. Misallocation of Resources (cont.)Oil is used for higher valued uses at high prices
Slide 12 of 36Slide 12 of 36
Price Ceilings5. Misallocation of Resources (cont.)
With price controls the consumers of oil with the highest value are unable to signal their high value by offering to pay a higher price.
Like the lines at gas stations, it becomes “first come, first served”.
Result: oil is allocated to random and often trivial uses. Only the least valued uses are left out (i.e., those uses that are valued less than the controlled price).
The next diagram illustrates this result.
Slide 13 of 36Slide 13 of 36
Price Ceilings5. Misallocation of Resources (cont.)
Price($)
Quantity
Supply
Demand
Controlled Price(ceiling)
Willingness topay for Qs
Qs Qd
Highest valued uses
Lower valueduses
Least valueduses
Conclusion: At the controlled price, there is no guarantee that oil will be allocated to the highest valued uses.
Slide 14 of 36Slide 14 of 36
Price Ceilings5. Misallocation of Resources (cont.)
Misallocation and Production Chaos
• Shortages in one market create breakdowns and shortages in other markets.
• Examples from 1973: In 1973 construction projects were delayed
because a few thousand dollars worth of steel bar were unavailable.
Shortages of steel drilling equipment made it difficult to expand oil supplies.
Schools, factories, and offices were forced to close.
Slide 15 of 36Slide 15 of 36
Price Ceilings5. Misallocation of Resources (cont.)
Government allocated oil supplies.• Created other problems:
Ordering gasoline stations to close on Sunday encouraged people to fill up earlier.
Daylight savings time and the 55 mph speed limit were implemented.
Fuel for noncommercial aircraft was cut.• Result: The local economy of Wichita,
Kansas, where private aircraft producers were located went into a tailspin.
Slide 16 of 36Slide 16 of 36
Price Ceilings5. Misallocation of Resources (cont.)
C. Jackson Grayson, chairman of President Nixon’s Price Commission, concluded:
“Our economic understanding and models are simply not powerful enough to handle such a large and complex economic system better than the market place.”
Price controls lifted on…
•Most goods: by April 1974
•Oil: morning of January 20,1981, Ronald Reagan’s first act as president.
•Shortage ended overnight and within a few years the price fell below the levels of 1979.
Slide 17 of 36
CHECK YOURSELF
Since World War II, New York City has had rent control, with ceilings placed on the rent that apartment landlords can charge. You are moving to New York City. Will you find a surplus or shortage of apartments?
Some landlords in New York City demand that new tenants pay $500 or $1000 key money: landlords will not hand over a set of apartment keys until this non-refundable payment is made. How does key money fit in our model of the effects of price ceilings?
Slide 18 of 36
CHECK YOURSELF
In rent-controlled New York City, over time, what do you think will happen to the upkeep of the rent-controlled buildings? What is the landlord’s incentive structure?
Slide 19 of 36Slide 19 of 36
Price Floors• A price floor is a minimum price allowed by
law.
• The best example of a price floor is the minimum wage.
• Price floors create four important effects:1. Surpluses
2. A loss of gains from trade (deadweight loss)
3. Wasteful increases in quality
4. A misallocation of resources
• Let’s look at each of these in turn.
Slide 20 of 36Slide 20 of 36
Price Floors1.Surpluses
Minimum wage leads to a surplus of labor (unemployment).
Higher productivity workers are unaffected. Minimum wage leads to ↓ employment among
younger workers• Young people lack skills and experience• More than half of minimum wage workers are
younger than 25 years old. The following diagram shows the effect of a
price floor (minimum wage)
Slide 21 of 36Slide 21 of 36
Price Floors1.Surpluses (cont.)
Wage($)
Quantity
Supply
Demand
Market employment
Minimum wage(floor)
Quantity demanded at minimum wage
Quantity suppliedat minimum wage
Market wage
Labor surplus
(Unemployment)Conclusion: the greater the differencebetween the minimum wage and the market wage, the greater is unemployment
Slide 22 of 36Slide 22 of 36
Price Floors2. Lost Gains from Trade
At the minimum wage • Employers would be willing to hire more
workers if they could offer lower wages.• Unemployed workers would be willing to work
at a lower wage. Implication: Mutually beneficial opportunities for
exchange of labor that can’t be exploited.• The value of these lost opportunities
represent the lost gains from trade. All of this is illustrated in the next diagram.
Slide 23 of 36Slide 23 of 36
Price Floors2. Lost Gains from Trade (cont.)
Wage($)
Quantity
Supply
Demand
Market employment
Minimum wage(floor)
Quantity demanded at minimum wage
Quantity suppliedat minimum wage
Market wage
Labor surplus
Lost producer(worker)surplus
Lost consumer (employer)surplus
Slide 24 of 36Slide 24 of 36
Price Floors2. Lost Gains from Trade (cont.)
The overall effect on the economy is small.• 93.9% of workers younger than 25 earn more
than the minimum wage. Minimum wage legislation is the topic of hot
political debate…• Democrats: It must be raised to help working
families.• Republicans: It will create unemployment
and raise prices. Both positions are overstated.
Slide 25 of 36Slide 25 of 36
Price Floors2. Lost Gains from Trade (cont.)
Benefits and costs of the minimum wage in the U.S.
• At best: ↑ wages of some teenagers and younger
workers• Their wages will increase anyway.
• At worst: ↑ price of a hamburger ↑ unemployment among teenagers
• Many will choose to stay in school longer (not necessarily a bad thing).
Slide 26 of 36Slide 26 of 36
Price Floors2. Lost Gains from Trade (cont.)
Large increases in the minimum wage could cause serious unemployment.
Example: Puerto Rico (1938)–was surprised to learn that the newly passed minimum wage in the U.S. would apply to them as well.• The new minimum wage was $.25 per hour;
in Puerto Rico many workers were earning $0.02 to $0.03 per hour. Result: Many Puerto Rican firms went
bankrupt causing devastating unemployment.
Slide 27 of 36Slide 27 of 36
Price Floors2. Lost Gains from Trade (cont.)
Minimum wages in other countries are sometimes much higher than in the U.S.• France
Minimum wage—nearly twice as high as the U.S. (relative to the median wage)
Labor regulations make it difficult to fire workers.
Combined result: 2005, 25% of French workers under 25 were unemployed.• The highest quarterly average for the
same age group in the U.S. in that year was 11.9%.
Slide 28 of 36Slide 28 of 36
Price Floors3. Wasteful Increases in Quality
The Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) regulated airlines from 1938 to 1978.• Prices were kept well above market rates.
How do we know this?• CAB only had jurisdiction over travel
between states, and...• fares for routes within the same state
were sometimes half the rate for similar routes between states.
Price floors cause firms to compete for customers by offering higher quality.
Slide 29 of 36Slide 29 of 36
Price Floors3. Wasteful Increases in Quality (cont.)
Example: When the airlines were regulated they competed by offering bone china, fancy meals, wide seats, and frequent flights.
Sounds great! But…
• If consumers were willing to pay for fine meals and more comfort, airlines would offer that service. Obviously, they don’t. Why not?
• Increase in quality comes at a price.
• Would you prefer a fine meal on your flight to Paris or more money to spend at a real Parisian restaurant?
Slide 30 of 36Slide 30 of 36
Price Floors3. Wasteful Increases in Quality (cont.)
Conclusion:
• An increase in quality that consumers are not willing to pay for is a wasteful increase in quality.
• As firms competed by offering higher quality, the initial producer surplus was wasted away. This loss is shown in the next diagram.
Slide 31 of 36Slide 31 of 36
Price Floors3. Wasteful Increases in Quality (cont.)
Price(fare)
Quantity of flights
Supply
Demand
CAB regulated fare
(floor)
Quantity demanded
Willingnessto sell
“Quality” Waste
Market equilibrium
Slide 32 of 36Slide 32 of 36
Price Floors4. The Misallocation of Resources
Regulation of airline fares could not have been maintained for 40 years had the CAB not also regulated entry.• Firms wanted to enter the industry because
fares were kept high.• Under the influence of the older airlines, the
CAB routinely prevented new competitors from entering. Evidence: In 1938 there were 16 major
airlines; by 1974 there were just 10 despite requests to enter the industry.
Slide 33 of 36Slide 33 of 36
Price Floors4. The Misallocation of Resources (cont.)
Restrictions to entry misallocated resources because low-cost airlines were kept out.• Southwest Airlines
Began as a Texas-only airline. Entered the national market only after
deregulation in 1978. Has become one of the largest and most
profitable airlines in the U.S• Deregulation improved the allocation of
resources by allowing low-cost, innovative firms to expand nationally.
Slide 34 of 36
CHECK YOURSELF
The European Union has a minimum legal price for butter, a price floor, that is often above the market equilibrium price. What do you think has been the result of this?
The U.S. has set a price floor for milk above the equilibrium price. Has this led to shortages or surpluses? How do you think the U.S. government has dealt with this? (Hint: remember the cartons of milk you had in grammar school and high school? What was their price?
Slide 35 of 36Slide 35 of 36
Takeaway• You should be able to:
draw a diagram showing the price ceiling and correctly labeling the shortage, and on the same diagram...
Locate the wasteful losses from waiting in line and the lost gains from trade.
• You should also understand how price ceilings… Reduce product quality. Misallocate resources.
• Not only in the market with the price ceiling but throughout the economy.
Slide 36 of 36Slide 36 of 36
Takeaway• Using the tools of supply and demand you
should be able to… Explain why a price floor creates:
• a surplus• a deadweight loss• wasteful increases in quality
Label these areas on a diagram.
• You should also be able to explain how price floors cause resources to be misallocated.