Slide 1

GIZ Support to Ministry of Urban Development

Training on Preparation of City Sanitation Plan – Part 2

State of Uttarakhand

Session 1:Review of Status Report

Dehradun, 20-22 April 2017

Slide 2

Status Report: Introduction

• It shows the requirements for an appropriate sanitation system in

the ULB both from technical and user perspective.

• It provides the basis for developing software (management aspect)

or hardware (infrastructure related) interventions.

• Status report preparation is designed to be strongly participatory

and therefore guarantees the acceptance and support from all

stakeholders before initiating any planning

The Status report captures the status of sanitation sector and sanitation

related sectors in the city.

Slide 3

Status Report Overview

• 14 out of 14 Clusters have submitted

Status Report (21 out of 24 ULBs)

• Status Reports were submitted ULB wise

and not cluster-wise Compilation

required

• Champion Cities: Muni ki Reti, Kirtinagar,

Karnaprayag/Gauchar, Almora, Agastmuni,

Tehri

Slide 4

Highlights from Status Report

• The majority of Status Reports were submitted timely

to UDD for review

• The nodal officers at cluster level have managed to

obtain data from various departments

• The Status Reports show that the participants have

understood the template and training inputs

• All cities have achieved a base document, on which

the CSP can be built on

Slide 5

SELECTED CLUSTERS/ULBs FOR CSP PREPARATION

Clusters ULBs of each cluster

Region 1 Joshimath a. Joshimath Submitted

a. Badrinath Submitted

Karnaprayag a. Karnprayag Submitted

b. Gauchar Submitted

Chamoli-Gopeshwar a. Chamoli Gopeshwar Submitted

b. Nandraprayag

Region 2 Rishikesh a. Rishikesh Submitted

b. Muni Ki Reti Submitted

c. SwargAshram Submitted

Tehri Garhwal Submitted

Uttarkashi a. Uttarkashi Submitted

b. Chinyalisaur Submitted

Mussoorie Submitted

Region 3 Pauri Garhwal a. Pauri Submitted

b. Devprayag Submitted

c. Srinagar Submitted

d. Kirtinagar Submitted

Rudraprayag a.Rudraprayg Submitted

b. Agastmuni Submitted

Region 4 Almora Submitted

Ramnagar Submitted

Bageshwar Submitted

Region 5 Pithoragarh Submitted

Champawat Submitted

Slide 6

Highlights from Status Reports (Region-wise)

• STRENGTHS

• Presentation of CSTF and on-ground activities in Karnaprayag and Gauchar

• Illustration of Status Report with photographs

• Karnaprayag and Gauchar used the same structure so compilation will be easy

• Detailed maps provided in Karnaprayag

• WEAKNESSES

• Not all information was provided in Chamoli Gopeshwar

• Tables (Wastewater disposal, Municipal Finances, etc.) were not well understood

Region 1

Joshimath (Joshimath and Badrinath)

Karnaprayag (Karnaprayag and Gauchar)

Chamoli Gopeshwar (Chamoli Gopeshwar, Nandprayag)

Slide 7

Highlights from Status Reports (Region-wise)

• STRENGTHS

• The template was followed properly in Tehri

• Explanation of processes beyond tables in Mussorie and Munni ki Reti

• Information on on-going infrastructure projects in Mussoorie

• Very detailed information on water supply in Mussoorie

• WEAKNESSES

• Lack of information beyond quantitative tables in Tehri

• Not all sections were completed in the report of Rishikesh

Region 2

Rishikesh(Rishikesh, Munni ki Reti, Swarg Ashram)

Tehri

Uttarkashi (Uttarkashi, Chinyalisaur)

Mussoorie

Slide 8

Highlights from Status Reports (Region-wise)

• STRENGTHS

• Quantitative data on Solid Waste Management and Wastewater in Agastmuni

• Information on municipal finance in Srinagar

• Completeness and overall structure of Kirtinagar report

• WEAKNESSES

• Compilation of status reports in Pauri Garhwal Cluster will be a challenge

• Information on CSTF missing in most reports

Region 3

Pauri Garhwal (Pauri, Kirtinagar, Srinagar, Devprayag)

Rudraprayag (Rudraprayag, Agastmuni)

Slide 9

Highlights from Status Reports (Region-wise)

• STRENGTHS

• Section on city profile of Bageshwar

• Overall structure and completeness of sections of Almora

• WEAKNESSES

• Chapter on capacity enhancement and health and hygiene is completely missing in Bageshwar

• Qualitative information in the chapters is missing for Ramnagar

Region 4

Almora

Ramnagar

Bageshwar

Slide 10

Highlights from Status Reports (Region-wise)

• STRENGTHS

• The reports are prepared as per template & includes all chapters

• The chapter on city profile provides basic information

• WEAKNESSES

• No maps, photographs & information on ongoing & proposed projects

• Most of the tables are incomplete which will make analysis difficult

Region 5

Pithoragarh

Champawat

Slide 11

Areas for strengthening1. Base maps have not been provided by majority of ULBs

2. Tabular data is mostly provided but no detailed description of

processes

3. Details of the proceedings with the CSTF (Minutes of Meetings,

Photographs, etc.) are missing. No ULB has included Minutes of

Meeting

4. Information provided to UDD under Swachh Bharat Mission on

Open Defecation and coverage of toilets not provided by any

ULB

5. No ULB has provided information on existing bye-laws, rules

and regulations for sanitation sector

6. The information provided in the tables is not complete/

Status Reports need to give a clear and complete picture of the

sanitation sector in the respective ULB

Slide 12

As a federal enterprise, GIZ supports the German Government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development.

Published byDeutsche Gesellschaft fürInternationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Registered offices, Bonn and Eschborn, Germany

“Support to National Urban Sanitation Policy Programme”

“2nd floor, B-5/2, Safdarjung Encalve , New Delhi – 110029”T 011 - 494945353F 011 - 49495391

E dirk.walther@giz.de,

I www.giz.de

Responsible

GIZ – SNUSP

Author(s)

GIZ

In cooperation with

Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India