Session 1 · 2017-05-03 · Session 1: Review of Status Report Dehradun, 20-22 April 2017. Slide 2...
Transcript of Session 1 · 2017-05-03 · Session 1: Review of Status Report Dehradun, 20-22 April 2017. Slide 2...
Slide 1
GIZ Support to Ministry of Urban Development
Training on Preparation of City Sanitation Plan – Part 2
State of Uttarakhand
Session 1:Review of Status Report
Dehradun, 20-22 April 2017
Slide 2
Status Report: Introduction
• It shows the requirements for an appropriate sanitation system in
the ULB both from technical and user perspective.
• It provides the basis for developing software (management aspect)
or hardware (infrastructure related) interventions.
• Status report preparation is designed to be strongly participatory
and therefore guarantees the acceptance and support from all
stakeholders before initiating any planning
The Status report captures the status of sanitation sector and sanitation
related sectors in the city.
Slide 3
Status Report Overview
• 14 out of 14 Clusters have submitted
Status Report (21 out of 24 ULBs)
• Status Reports were submitted ULB wise
and not cluster-wise Compilation
required
• Champion Cities: Muni ki Reti, Kirtinagar,
Karnaprayag/Gauchar, Almora, Agastmuni,
Tehri
Slide 4
Highlights from Status Report
• The majority of Status Reports were submitted timely
to UDD for review
• The nodal officers at cluster level have managed to
obtain data from various departments
• The Status Reports show that the participants have
understood the template and training inputs
• All cities have achieved a base document, on which
the CSP can be built on
Slide 5
SELECTED CLUSTERS/ULBs FOR CSP PREPARATION
Clusters ULBs of each cluster
Region 1 Joshimath a. Joshimath Submitted
a. Badrinath Submitted
Karnaprayag a. Karnprayag Submitted
b. Gauchar Submitted
Chamoli-Gopeshwar a. Chamoli Gopeshwar Submitted
b. Nandraprayag
Region 2 Rishikesh a. Rishikesh Submitted
b. Muni Ki Reti Submitted
c. SwargAshram Submitted
Tehri Garhwal Submitted
Uttarkashi a. Uttarkashi Submitted
b. Chinyalisaur Submitted
Mussoorie Submitted
Region 3 Pauri Garhwal a. Pauri Submitted
b. Devprayag Submitted
c. Srinagar Submitted
d. Kirtinagar Submitted
Rudraprayag a.Rudraprayg Submitted
b. Agastmuni Submitted
Region 4 Almora Submitted
Ramnagar Submitted
Bageshwar Submitted
Region 5 Pithoragarh Submitted
Champawat Submitted
Slide 6
Highlights from Status Reports (Region-wise)
• STRENGTHS
• Presentation of CSTF and on-ground activities in Karnaprayag and Gauchar
• Illustration of Status Report with photographs
• Karnaprayag and Gauchar used the same structure so compilation will be easy
• Detailed maps provided in Karnaprayag
• WEAKNESSES
• Not all information was provided in Chamoli Gopeshwar
• Tables (Wastewater disposal, Municipal Finances, etc.) were not well understood
Region 1
Joshimath (Joshimath and Badrinath)
Karnaprayag (Karnaprayag and Gauchar)
Chamoli Gopeshwar (Chamoli Gopeshwar, Nandprayag)
Slide 7
Highlights from Status Reports (Region-wise)
• STRENGTHS
• The template was followed properly in Tehri
• Explanation of processes beyond tables in Mussorie and Munni ki Reti
• Information on on-going infrastructure projects in Mussoorie
• Very detailed information on water supply in Mussoorie
• WEAKNESSES
• Lack of information beyond quantitative tables in Tehri
• Not all sections were completed in the report of Rishikesh
Region 2
Rishikesh(Rishikesh, Munni ki Reti, Swarg Ashram)
Tehri
Uttarkashi (Uttarkashi, Chinyalisaur)
Mussoorie
Slide 8
Highlights from Status Reports (Region-wise)
• STRENGTHS
• Quantitative data on Solid Waste Management and Wastewater in Agastmuni
• Information on municipal finance in Srinagar
• Completeness and overall structure of Kirtinagar report
• WEAKNESSES
• Compilation of status reports in Pauri Garhwal Cluster will be a challenge
• Information on CSTF missing in most reports
Region 3
Pauri Garhwal (Pauri, Kirtinagar, Srinagar, Devprayag)
Rudraprayag (Rudraprayag, Agastmuni)
Slide 9
Highlights from Status Reports (Region-wise)
• STRENGTHS
• Section on city profile of Bageshwar
• Overall structure and completeness of sections of Almora
• WEAKNESSES
• Chapter on capacity enhancement and health and hygiene is completely missing in Bageshwar
• Qualitative information in the chapters is missing for Ramnagar
Region 4
Almora
Ramnagar
Bageshwar
Slide 10
Highlights from Status Reports (Region-wise)
• STRENGTHS
• The reports are prepared as per template & includes all chapters
• The chapter on city profile provides basic information
• WEAKNESSES
• No maps, photographs & information on ongoing & proposed projects
• Most of the tables are incomplete which will make analysis difficult
Region 5
Pithoragarh
Champawat
Slide 11
Areas for strengthening1. Base maps have not been provided by majority of ULBs
2. Tabular data is mostly provided but no detailed description of
processes
3. Details of the proceedings with the CSTF (Minutes of Meetings,
Photographs, etc.) are missing. No ULB has included Minutes of
Meeting
4. Information provided to UDD under Swachh Bharat Mission on
Open Defecation and coverage of toilets not provided by any
ULB
5. No ULB has provided information on existing bye-laws, rules
and regulations for sanitation sector
6. The information provided in the tables is not complete/
Status Reports need to give a clear and complete picture of the
sanitation sector in the respective ULB
Slide 12
As a federal enterprise, GIZ supports the German Government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development.
Published byDeutsche Gesellschaft fürInternationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Registered offices, Bonn and Eschborn, Germany
“Support to National Urban Sanitation Policy Programme”
“2nd floor, B-5/2, Safdarjung Encalve , New Delhi – 110029”T 011 - 494945353F 011 - 49495391
I www.giz.de
Responsible
GIZ – SNUSP
Author(s)
GIZ
In cooperation with
Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India