Research Possibilities of IoT in IndiaAPHRDI... · establish a basis for a new line of technology...

Post on 20-Jul-2020

0 views 0 download

Transcript of Research Possibilities of IoT in IndiaAPHRDI... · establish a basis for a new line of technology...

Research Possibilities of IoT in India

3 Day Residential Training Programme on

“Internet of Things for Digital World”

Andhra Pradesh Human Resource Development Institute (Govt. of Andhra Pradesh)5-7 February, 2018

Venkata Sundaranand Putcha

Professor and Head

Department of Mathematics, Rayalaseema University, Kurnool-518007

Future Emerging Technologies

The Budget

Budget increase from €53bn in FP7 to €77bn in Horizon 2020 (at current prices)

OTHERS: 5,8B€ (Spreading excellence & widening participation, Science & Society, JRC, EIT)

Excellent Science 24,4bn€

Societal Challenges

29,6bn€

Industrial Leadership

17bn€

Pillar structure

H2020 will focus resources on 3 key priorities:

Excellent Science (1)

ERC (13B€)

FET (Future and Emerging Technologies) (2.7B€)

Marie Curie Actions (6.1B€)

European Research Infrastructures (2.4B€)

Societal Challenges (3)

Health, demographic change and wellbeing

European Bioeconomy Challenges

Secure, clean and efficient energy

Smart, green and integrated transport

Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials

Europe in a changing world

Secure societies

Industrial Leadership (2)

Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies

Innovation in SMEs and Access to risk finance

Widening Participation, Science with and for Society

EURATOM Joint Research Centre (JRC)

Overview of FET schemes

FET-Open FET Coordination and Support Actions

FET-Proactive initiatives Global Systems Science (GSS) Knowing, doing and being: cognition beyond problem solving Quantum Simulation Towards exascale high performance computing (HPC)

FET Flagships The Graphene Human Brain Project

Future and emerging technologies shall support collaborative research in order to extend Europe’s capacity for advanced and paradigm-changing innovation. It shall foster scientific collaboration across disciplines on radically new, high-risk ideas and accelerate development of the most promising emerging areas of science and technology as well as the Union wide structuring of the corresponding scientific communities."

Future and Emerging Technologies (FET)

Expanded from ICT and Energy to be used as cross-cutting funding scheme

Supports frontier research: alternative ideas, concepts or paradigms of risky or non-conventional nature (similar to ERC)

Open, light and agile Roadmap based research

FET Open

• Exploring novel ideas

• Individual research

• Early ideas

• Coordination and support action

FET Proactive

• Developing topics and communities – cluster of research projects

• Global System Sciences

• Knowing, doing being-cognition beyond problem solving

• Quantum simulation

• Towards exascale high performance computing

FET Flagship

• Tackling grand interdisciplinary science and technology challenges

• Graphene

• Human Brain (HBP)

• Support for Flagships

FET Open:

1. FET OPEN – Novel ideas for radically new technologies

Open is open – All technologies, no thematic restriction

Cut off dates: 30/09/2014, 31/03/2015 and 29/09/2015

Total budget: 160M€ in 2014 – 2015

Instrument:

Research and Innovation Action –154M€

Coordination and Support Actions (CSA) – 6M€

FET

Long –term vision

High Risk

Novelty

Foundational

Interdisciplinary

S&T targeted

FET Open: FET Gatekeepers

Long-term vision: a new, original or radical long-term vision of technology-enabled possibilities going far beyond the state of the art

•Breakthrough S&T target: scientifically ambitious and technologically concrete breakthroughs plausibly attainable within the life-time of the project.

•Foundational: the breakthroughs must be foundational in the sense that they can establish a basis for a new line of technology not currently anticipated.

•Novelty: new ideas and concepts, rather than the application or incremental refinement of existing ones.

•High-risk: the potential of a new technological direction depends on a whole range of factors that cannot be apprehended from a single disciplinary viewpoint.

•Interdisciplinary: the proposed collaborations must go beyond current mainstream collaboration configurations in joint S&T research, and must aim to advance different scientific and technological disciplines together and in synergy towards a breakthrough.

FETOPEN 1: FET – Open research projects

Specific challenge: Supporting a large set of early stage, high riskvisionary science and technology collaborative research projects isnecessary for the successful exploration of new foundations forradically new future technologies. Nurturing fragile ideas requires anagile, risk-friendly and highly interdisciplinary research approach,expanding well beyond the strictly technological disciplines.Recognising and stimulating the driving role of new high-potentialactors in research and innovation, such as women, young researchersand high-tech SMEs, is also important for nurturing the scientific andindustrial leaders of the future.

Project size: 2 to 4M€

1 step submission and evaluation of a 16 pages proposal

Proposals are not anonymous

Deadlines 30/09/2014 31/03/2015 29/09/2015

Budget 77M€ 38.5M€ 38.5M€

FETOPEN 2: FET – Coordination and Support Activities 2014

Specific challenge: The challenge is to make Europe the best place in the world for collaborative research on future and emerging technologies that will renew the basis for future European competitiveness and growth, and that will make a difference for society in the decades to come.

Scope: Proposals shall address one of the following topics:

•FET Observatory: identifying new opportunities and directions for FET research

•FET Communication: communicating on FET projects and activities

•FET Exchange: structuring an emerging FET-relevant topic and communities

•FET Conference: supporting the organisation of the third FET Conference

•FET Prizes: identifying suitable areas for prizes and competitions in FET

•FET Impact: Assessing the impacts of the FET programme

Project size: 0.3 to 0.5M€ per topic, up to 1M€ for FET Conference

Deadlines 30/09/2014

Budget 3.0M€

FETOPEN 3: FET – Coordination and Support Activities 2015

Specific challenge: The challenge is to make Europe the best place in the world for collaborative research on future and emerging technologies that will renew the basis for future European competitiveness and growth, and that will make a difference for society in the decades to come.

Scope: Proposals shall address one of the following topics:

• FET Exchange: structuring an emerging FET-relevant topic and communities

• FET Take-Up: actions for stimulating take-up of FET research results towards impact and innovation

Project size: 0.3 to 0.5M€ per topic

Deadlines 31/03/2015 29/09/2015

Budget 1.5M€ 1.5M€

FETPROACT 1-3: 2014

Project sizes: 2 to 4M€ (GSS 2-3M€)

-> Deadline: 1/04/2014

Total Budget: 35M€ in WP 2014 – 2015

• Results expected by 1 September!

• 184 proposals submitted

• Updated WP 2014-2015 to be published at the end of June

1. FETPROACT 1: Global Systems Science (GSS) – 20142. FETPROACT 2: Knowing, doing, being: cognition beyond problem solving (GSS) – 20143. FETPROACT 3: Quantum simulation – 2014

FET - High Performance Computing

HPC is an important asset for the EU's innovation capacity of strategic importance to the EU's industrial and scientific capabilities as well as its citizens: developing innovative industrial products and services, increasing competitiveness, addressing societal and scientific grand challenges more effectively.

Europe has the technology, knowledge and human skills to develop capabilities covering the whole technological spectrum of the next HPC generation (exascale computing)

Importance of developing state-of-the-art HPC technologies, systems, software, applications and services in Europe

All relevant actors, public and private, need to work in partnership Invites the EC to elaborate its plans for HPC to support academic and industrial

research and innovation under H2020

FET – HPC: Critical Technologies, addressing Societal Challenges

Health, demographic change and well-being (Personalised medicine, pharma/bio-medical simulations, Virtual

Physiological Human, Human Brain Project) Smart, green and integrated transport engineering

(performance, sustainability, energy efficiency) Inclusive, innovative societies

(Smart Cities, multivariable decision/analytics support) Climate action

(Simulators for Climate & Earth Sciences, Gas&Oil) Secure, clean and efficient energy

(Fusion, nuclear plant simulations) Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine research and the bio-economy

(simulation of sustainability factors (e.g. weather forecast, stock plagues and diseases control, etc))

FETHPC 1: HPC core Technologies, Programming Environments and

Algorithms for Extreme Parallelism and Extreme Data Applications - 2014

Specific challenge: Addressing the exascale challenges to achieve, by 2020, the full range of technological capabilities for exascale-class HPC systems which are balanced at all levels and validated with significant application drivers

Scope:

a. Core technologies and architectures (e.g. processors, memory, interconnect and storage) and their optimal integration into HPC systems, platforms and prototypes

b. Programming methodologies, environments languages and tools: new programming models for extreme parallelism and extreme data applications

c. APIs and system software for future extreme scale systems

d. New mathematical and algorithmic approaches (e.g. ultra-scalable algorithms for extreme scale systems with quantifiable performance for existing or visionary applications)

Project size: 2 to 4 M€, up to 8M€ per topic a)

Budget: 93.4M€ -> Deadline 25/11/2014, with a minimum of 60% to be allocated to research under part a) of the scope

FETHPC 2: HPC Ecosystem Development – 2014

HPC Ecosystem Development – 2014

Specific challenge: To develop a sustainable European HPC Ecosystem

Scope:

Coordination of the HPC strategy : coordination of the activities of stakeholderssuch as ETP4HPC, PRACE, application owners and users (including emerging HPCapplications), the European exascale computing research community, the opensource HPC community, etc.

Excellence in High Performance Computing Systems : boost European researchexcellence on the key challenges towards the next generations of high-performance computing systems; cutting across all levels – hardware,architectures, programming, applications; ensure a durable integration of therelevant European research teams; self-sustainability of the research integrationon the longer-term

Project size: 2 to 4 M€

Budget: 4M€ -> Deadline 25/11/2014

Conditions for participation

Minimum conditions: FET, LEIT and Societal Challenges (apart from JTIs)

For standard collaborative actions (RIA and IA) 3 legal entities, each established in different MS/ACFor CSA : 1 legal entityFor SME Instrument and programme co-fund 1 legal entity established in a MS/AC

Industry participation is highly advisable even if not a requirement!

Funding Model (as per Horizon 2020)

Simplified funding:

Direct Costs:• 100% for Research and Innovation actions (+CSA)• 70% for Innovation (non-profit entities up to 100%)WP to specify the reimbursement rate (RIA or IA)

Indirect Costs:• Flat rate of 25% of total direct costs, excluding subcontracting, costs

of third parties and financial support to third parties

*Funding of the action not exceed total eligible costs minus receipts

Evaluation Criteria: Research project

Excellence Impact Implementation

Clarity of targeted breakthrough and its specific science and technology contributions

Importance of the new technological outcome with regards to its transformational impact on technology and/or society.

Quality of the work plan and clarity of intermediate targets.

Novelty, level of ambition and foundational character

Quality of measures for achieving impact on science, technology and/or society.

Relevant expertise in the consortium.

Range and added value from interdisciplinary

Impact from empowerment of new and high potential actors towards future technological leadership.

Appropriate allocation and justification of resources (person-months, equipment, budget).

Appropriateness of the research methods

Threshold:4/5Weight:60%

Threshold:3.5/5Weight:20%

Threshold:3/5Weight:20%

Evaluation Criteria: CSA

Excellence Impact Implementation

Clarity of objectives Transformational impact on the communities and/or practices for high-risk and high-impact research

Quality of the work plan and management structure

Contribution to the coordination and/or support of high-risk and high-impact research for new or emerging areas or horizontally

Appropriateness of measures for spreading excellence, use of results, and dissemination of knowledge, including engagement with stakeholders

Relevant expertise in the consortium.

Appropriateness of the coordination and/or support activities

Appropriate allocation and justification of resources (person-months, equipment, budget).

Threshold:3/5Weight:40%

Threshold:3/5Weight:40%

Threshold:3/5Weight:20%

Evaluation Summary Report

S&T Excellence Impact Implementation

Panel comments

Expert 1 comments

Expert 2 comments

Score /5 Expert 3 comments

Expert 4 comments

Total weighted score /5

Evaluation Process

Eligibility Check

Individual Reading

(Remote/on Site)

ConsensusPanel

Review

Process monitored by independent experts

YES?

Evaluators invited on a call-by-call basis

Balanced selection of experts (scientific expertise, geography, gender)

Internet of Things : a new space for innovation ?

Pierre-Jean.Benghozi@polytechnique.edu

Let’s remind the main arguments and hypothesis regarding innovation

Specificity and centrality of innovation processes call for : Global design of market and organisation

Rather than Upstream / downstream push / pull sequential and linear sectorial and layer oriented

Diversity of innovative resources and assets Control of creative resources and market design

Rather than business strategy, competition & market price

New means for regulation and public policies

Yet to keep in mind The key role of technology

To provide new products and services To support « new » creative processes 24

Some questions are specifically addressed to [by] the internet

An unlike wave of (generic) technology a web folio combination of various components a large range of functionalities Flexible technologies supporting various projects

Generating certainties and doubts Economic or technical lever ?

Evolution or digital revolution

25

Distinctiveness of innovative processes in the internet

An unlike wave of (generic) technology a combination of various components and functionalities Flexible technologies supporting various projects

New economic and organisational designs Conceiving Business model + uses + applications + technology Restructuring the value chains Competition from outside ICT sectors and from various layers

Acceleration and globality of the conception process Various paces of innovation to master Valuating new set of resources

Generating certainties and doubts Economic or technical lever ?

Evolution or digital revolution Some questions to be specially addressed

26

Some consequences

Innovation viewpoint might be overlighted Traditional innovation models undermined by digitisation

Individual creator dissolves in collective conception

Transformation of the value chain Growing role of distribution and Reversing cost structure

Brand dominance Infomediation Logistics

Structuring and diversifying business models Valuating new technical devices, communities of users Cross subsidization and importance of ancillary markets

27

A situation emphasized in/bythe internet of things (IoT)

29

How to Define the Iot?• Formally : a network of networks which enables to

identify digital entities and physical objects • whether they are inanimate (including plants) or

animate (animals and human beings) – directly and without ambiguity, via standardized electronic identification systems and wireless mobile devices, and thus make it possible to retrieve, store, transfer and process data relating to them, without discontinuity between the physical and virtual worlds” (Benghozi, Bureau, Massit-Folléa, 2008)

• Conceptually : new identities for objects• “Things having identities and virtual personalities operating

in smart spaces using intelligent interfaces to connect andcommunicate within social, environmental, and usercontexts” (working group Eposs)

• Technically : an extension of the Internet• naming system and reveals a convergence of digital

identifiers in the sense that it is possible to identify digital information (URL website addresses for instance) and physical elements (like a pallet in a warehouse, or a sheep in a herd) in a standardized way

• From the user point: a new space for innovativeservices

Definiton

IoT = the future of the internet ?

• R&D programs all over the world• Europe (ambiant intelligence), Japon (ubiquituous computing)

China…

• Complementary technological paths :• Convergence and discontinuities : 1.0 ≈ 2.0 ≈ 3.0• From bar code to multiple electronic identification devices• From early B2B to massive applications (animals, health…)

• Major socio-technico-economic trends• From product to services• From fixed to mobile technologies• Physical and virtual worlds• Complex and unstable technological choices and standards• Attractive technologies : but unknown and badly accepted

• Conflicting visions and various questions at stake :• consistency, sustainability and (low) cost• Portfolio of technologies, networks and applications• Incentive and support for innovation for economic growth• To implement pervasive but non intrusive systems

30

IoT a support for various dreams

Perfect identification – traceability

New Big Brother

Cost killing applications

Improve quality, reduce errors

A tag as usuals Extension of traditional Bar code

31

Rather :a network of converging networks

32

Internet : IPv6

Mobility

Sensors

ad hoc networksRFID, tags & readers

Data matrix

GPS

ONS

Id est = a system of systems

33

Type of

system

Identification

(incl. readers)

Sensors Connection Integration Data

processing

Networks

Stakes Identifying each

object in a

unique way and

retrieving data

stored in the

object

Collecting

information in

the environment

to enrich the

functionalities of

the systems

Connecting

systems between

themselves

Integrating

systems for data

to be transmitted

from one layer to

another

Storing and

analysing data to

launch a process

or ease decision-

making

Transferring data

to and from

physical and

virtual worlds

Old

technologies

(examples)

Barcodes, simple

RFID solutions

Thermometer

hydrometer…

Cables, … Middleware… Excel, ERP, CRM… Internet,

Ethernet…

Recent

technologies

(examples)

Complex RFID

solutions,

Surface Acoustic

Waves, optical

chips, AND

Miniature

sensors,

nanotechnologies

Bluetooth,

Near Field

Communication,

WiFi...

Complex

middleware

Datawarehouse 3D

(compatible with

RFID chips),

Semantic Web …

EPCglobal

network…

Supporting a large range of applications

34

Creating space for innovative apps

35

Innovation fostered by interoperability

• Interoperability is a crucial building block• increasing variety of applications• enabling emergence of niche-markets (long-tail)• articulating standard technical interfaces and P2P• allowing convergence of distinct systems in the open ecosystem of IoT,

• Interoperability reduces access barriers• to digital content• to a great variety of innovative services of any kind

• Interoperability enhances user autonomy• increases creativity and freedom of stakeholders and actors in the field• widen the range of choice for consumer

36

Conclusion :Drivers and uncertainties

37Remain on the phone, I think I even took a picture of my ear

38

The technical side

• Competing technical solutions• Different types of RFID• Alternatives solutions to RFID

• The main technological needs• Guaranteeing the performance of solutions in use contexts

• Ensuring the durability of solutions

• Conceiving an efficient data management system

• Some specific bottlenecks (memory, privacy…)

• The standardization and interoperability = a key dimension• Dependence on existing standards.

• A standard of standards.

• Standards “granularity” and interoperability

39

The business perspective

What performance?– Local contexts (quality, prices…)

– Macro effects

Who should invest and why?– Traditional firms vs new entrants

– ROI

New Business Models– Redefinition of the value chains

– New services for consumers

– New resources for efficiency

The supply side– Which market ?

– Which suppliers ?

The usability viewpoint

40

41

Diffusion uncertainties : privacy, the mostly mentionned risk

Multifaceted risk– Traditional + emerging

– Personal + industrial

– Technical + process questions

Efficiciency vs. PrivacyMultiple identities, regulationA market for security and Privacy Enhancing Technologies

Yet startling risks

42

Consequence : a second hand creativity society ?

Evidence for innovations The rising of interoperability, mashups and UGC Incentives to innovate on the level playing field

Interoperability leads to increased competition reduction of lock-in effects and market entry barriers

leads to more innovation on services rather than technology ? Impact on radical innovation unclear Interoperability does not always lead to innovation May be destructive in some cases

44

45

Public policies and governance at stake

Industrial regulation and innovation Industrial policy and incentives for R&D + implementation

Competition policy

Technical governance Governance of network infrastructure

The net neutrality

Regulatory frameworks Firms

Consumers and citizens

Standardization of data

46

Introduction to our reality

47

Technology InterplayInternet of Things (IoT) Ecosystem

User Centric

o Securityo Trusto Privacy

o Architecture Reference Modelo Security/Privacy/Trust by Design

IoT PlatformsFederation Inter-operability

Big data

5G

Semantics

Cloud

48

IoT Opportunities for Growth in the EU

IDC expects the IoT market in EU to

expand yearly over 20% in value between

2013 and 2020

IoT revenues in the EU28: increase

from more than €307 bn in 2013 to more than €1,181

bn in 2020.

49

Five key challenges on IoT in the EU

Rapid technological development

Users' take up and acceptability

Need to move into deployment

Risk of fragmentation

International competition

50

51 M€ EC funding in 2015 for IoT Innovation

Ecosystems

IoT: hot topic for industry, investors and

start-ups in Europe

140 M€ EC funding in 2016- 2017 for IoT

In FP7 - 3 calls 100 M€ budget for R&D

and piloting (see IERC-WG1)

What has the European Commission done until now?

51

EC Call for proposals for Internet of Things (#H2020)

1. IoT-01-2016: Large Scale Pilots Total Budget 100 MEUR (funding rate: 70%)

Pilot areas: Pilot 1: Smart living environments for ageing well (EU contr. up to 20 MEUR) Pilot 2: Smart Farming and Food Security (EU contr. up to 30 MEUR) Pilot 3: Wearables for smart ecosystems (EU contr. up to 15MEUR) Pilot 4: Reference zones in EU cities (EU contr. up to 15MEUR) Pilot 5: Autonomous vehicles in a connected environment (EU contr. up to 20 MEUR)

WHERE TO APPLY: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/calls/h2020-iot-2016-2017.html#c,topics=callIdentifier/t/H2020-IOT-2016-2017/1/1/1&callStatus/t/Forthcoming/1/1/0&callStatus/t/Open/1/1/0&callStatus/t/Closed/1/1/0&+identifier/desc).

2. IoT-02-2016: IoT Horizontal activities. Total budget: 4 MEUR

a) up to 3 MEUR (funding rate: 100%), b) up to 1 MEUR (funding rate: 100%)

3. IoT International Cooperation. Total budget: 17 MEUR

• ICT-37-2016: China: Collaboration on Future Internet (CSA) (http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/5079-ict-37-2016.html) • EUJ-02-2016: Japan: IoT/Cloud/Big Data platforms in social application contexts (RIA)(https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal4/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/2419-euj-02-2016.html) • EUK-02-2016: South Korea: IoT joint research (RIA)(http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/2334-euk-02-2016.html) • EUB-02-2017: Brazil: IoT Pilots (RIA)(http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/2080-eub-02-2017.html)

52

Alliance for Internet of Things Innovation

(AIOTI)

Official launch of the AIOTI (25/03/2015)

53

Structure of the AIOTI

54

Why the AIOTI is unique?

55

AIOTI Mission Areas

Deployment

• Identify barriers• Gather evidence• Contribute to the Digital

Single Market

Large Scale Pilots

• Experimentation,replication and deployment

• Convergence• Interoperability• H2020

IoT Uptake

• Identify spearhead players

• Communicate• Champion

IoT Ecosystem

• Build across different application areas

• Mapping and bridging of IoTinnovation activities

• Encourage the growth of start-ups in IoT

56

More than 350 AIOTI members from 24 countries

Associations

Large companies

SMEs

Start-ups

AIOTI is an IoT global key player and the voice of #Europe on #IoT

57

AIOTI members per size, country and business sector

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Au

stri

a

Be

lgiu

m

Bu

lgar

ia

Cze

ch R

epu

blic

De

nm

ark

Fin

lan

d

Fran

ce

Ger

man

y

Gre

ece

Hu

nga

ry

Ire

lan

d

Ital

y

Lith

uan

ia

Luxe

mb

ou

rg

Mal

ta

Net

her

lan

ds

No

rway

Po

lan

d

Po

rtu

gal

Serb

ia

Slo

ven

ia

Spai

n

Swed

en

Swit

zerl

and

Un

ite

d K

ingd

om

Un

ite

d S

tate

s

(bla

nk)

(Last update: 15/10/2015)

AIOTI is listed among IOT international key players, according to Forbes

58

Image Credit: Peter C Evans

AIOTI Recommendations for future IoT innovation and deployment are now published #H2020

https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/aioti-recommendations-future-collaborative-work-context-internet-things-focus-area-horizon-2020

59

AIOTI in the long term and stepping stones

2015March

Phase 1: Ignition

2015December

Phase 2:

First Positioning

2016

AprilPhase 3:Awareness

raising

2017

Phase 4: Strategy road

map

2020

Phase 5: Sustainability

IoT Security

Cryptography & Cryptanalysis System security

Network security Web security

Application security Malware defense

Information securityPhysical device security

Database security Cyber forensics

IoT Security

Cryptography & Cryptanalysis System security

Network security Web security

Application security Malware defense

Information securityPhysical device security

Database security Cyber forensics

Thanks for your Attention!!!