QUBIT VERSUS BIT

Post on 06-Jan-2016

51 views 1 download

Tags:

description

QUBIT VERSUS BIT. Lev Vaidman. Zion Mitrani Amir Kalev. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 , 217902 (2004),. quant-ph/0406024. 23 August 2004, Cambridge. BIT. QUBIT. q, f. BIT. QUBIT. q, f. TO WRITE q, f. TO WRITE 0, 1. TO READ 0, 1. TO READ 0, 1. NO!. N. N. N. N. N. N/2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of QUBIT VERSUS BIT

QUBIT VERSUS BIT

23 August 2004, Cambridge

Lev Vaidman

quant-ph/0406024

Zion MitraniAmir Kalev

Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 217902 (2004),

QUBIT BIT

TO READ TO READ

QUBIT BIT

TO WRITE TO WRITE

NO!

N N N

N/2 NN

N/2

DENSE CODING

N NKNOWN QUBITS

Teleportation

UNKNOWN QUBIT

2 BITS

Teleportation

UNKNOWN QUBIT

2 BITS

2

We cannot store and retrieve more than one bit in a qubit HOLEVO

What can we do with a qubit that we cannot do with a bit?

We cannot store and retrieve more than one bit in a qubit HOLEVO

What can we do with a qubit that we cannot do with a bit?

Tasks with 2 possible outcomes

1

32

4i

eveni

N

i

1

... N

oddi

N

i

1

?or

5

We know integeri

N

i

1

We cannot store and retrieve more than one bit in a qubit HOLEVO

What can we do with a qubit that we cannot do with a bit?

Tasks with 2 possible outcomes

1

32

4i

eveni

N

i

1

... N

oddi

N

i

1

?or

5

We know integeri

N

i

1

We cannot store and retrieve more than one bit in a qubit HOLEVO

What can we do with a qubit that we cannot do with a bit?

Tasks with 2 possible outcomes

1

32

4i

eveni

N

i

1

... N

oddi

N

i

1

?or

5

We know integeri

N

i

1

Measurement of the parity of the integral of a classical field Galvao and Hardy,Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 087902 (2003)

1

32

4i ... N

5

evenN

i i

N

i i 11

11

1 2

B

A

N

i i dxx)(1

1

N

i iinteger

ii

Measurement of the integral of a classical field

integerdxxIB

A )(

A

B

Measurement of the integral of a classical field

integerdxxIB

A )(

Binary representation of I

mod2)mod2()mod2(... 2mod2

2mod22

2

II IIII

)mod2(2mod2mod2 2mod22 IIII

2

3

dd 1

22 dd

223 dd

2mod2

2I

2

2

2

mod23

I

.

. .

.

.

. …1 0 1

A

B

2

3

dd 1

22 dd

223 dd

2mod2

2I

2

2

2

mod23

I

.

. .

.

.

.

0 0 0 0 0 … 1 0 1

n

12 n

dnd

2

1-n

2

mod2In

What can we do with bits passing one at a time?

A

B

( )xB

AdxxI )(

What can we do with bits passing one at a time?

A

B

or( )x

We can “write” a real number in a bit as the probability of its flip

dxxdp )(]flip[

B

AdxxI )(

dxxedxxdp )()(1]flipno[

Idxxdxx eeedpp )()(]flipno[

]flipno[ln1 pI 11 I

NeI

Uncertainty in measurement with bits

11 I

NeI

MI Optimization for M

2.1 N

MI 3.1

B

Adxx)(

The number of bits for finding MI is 2~ M

Uncertainty in measurement with bits

11 I

NeI

MI Optimization for M

2.1 N

MI 3.1

B

Adxx)(

The number of bits for finding MI is 2~ M

The number of qubits for finding MI is M2log~

Quantum method yields precise result for integer I if MN 2log

Measurement of the integral of a classical field

integernondxxIB

A )(

Measurement of the integral of a classical field

integernondxxIB

A )(

dd A

B

I N

1

N qubits

N

II

Measurement of the integral of a classical field

integernondxxIB

A )(

dd A

B

N

1

N entangled qubits

N

II

Peres and Scudo PRL 86 4160 (2001)

But the digital method works much better!

mdxxIB

A)(

ddnn 12

2

~2cos)

~( nn

np

2

~

21

.

. .

.

.

.

A

B

Inn 12

n~

2

~

2

~

32

21

N

1nn1-n2mI

~

~~

N

n

IInIIp

12

)~

(2cos)|~(

N

M

2

10

Quantum uncertainty

N

M

2

10~

Classical uncertainty N

M~

)mmIII ~(~

Information about I in N qubits is in N ,..., 21

Can we use a single particle in a superposition of N different states instead?

2

~

21

.

. .

.

.

.

Inn 12

n~

2

~

2

~

32

21

.

.

.

Information about I in N qubits is in N ,..., 21

Can we use a single particle in a superposition of N different states instead?

2

~

21

.

. .

.

.

.

Inn 12

n~

2

~

2

~

32

21

.

.

.

No. Hilbert space is too small : states2N states2ofinstead N

Measurement of the integral of a classical field with a single particle in a superposition of states

NK 2

)(x

)(int xK

kH

Measurement of the integral of a classical field with a single particle in a superposition of states

NK 2

)(x

)(int xK

kH

Measurement of the integral of a classical field with a single particle in a superposition of states

NK 2

mI ~~ Measurement yields

The probability of the error )( Ip III~

N qubits Single particle NK 2

Binary representation of k

k

N qubits Single particle

1101001

for0

for22

j

j

j K

I

K

kI

K

IN

j

jN

j j

22211

N

jN

1in )(

2

1

N

jj

j

K

kIi

Nkje

N

1

2

1

2

fin ),(2

1

K

kI2

Binary representation of k

k

N qubits Single particle

1101001

for0

for22

j

j

j K

I

K

kI

K

IN

j

jN

j j

22211

N

jN

1in )(

2

1

N

jj

j

K

kIi

Nkje

N

1

2

1

2

fin ),(2

1

K

kI2

Interaction

N qubits Single particle NK 2 states

Measurement of the integral of a classical field with N bits running together

A

Bdxxdp )(]count[

countsNI

N

MI

N

II

2

10

counts

Quantum methods

How to read a string of length out of strings

using a single particle?

NK 2 1N

How to read a string of length out of strings

using a single particle?

NK 2 1N

10

How to read a string of length out of strings

using a single particle?

NK 2 1N

10

Bits instead N2logWe need at least

What else can we do with the quantum phase ?