Professional Learning Team Conference

Post on 09-Jan-2016

39 views 1 download

Tags:

description

Direct Access to Achievement. Professional Learning Team Conference. Eugene Hilton December 4, 2013. Welcome!. When our efforts aren’t integrated and aligned…how likely is our actual progress?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Professional Learning Team Conference

Eugene HiltonDecember 4, 2013

Direct Access to Achievement

Welcome!

.

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Training Outcomes Related to Training Components

Training Outcomes

Training Components

Knowledge of Content

Skill Implementation ClassroomApplication

Presentation/ Lecture

PlusDemonstration

Plus Practice

Plus Coaching/ Admin SupportData Feedback

10% 5% 0%

30% 20% 0%

60% 60% 5%

95% 95% 95%

Joyce & Showers, 2002

Consider elements in the data team process

Determine your teams’ strengths and areas of need

Identify resources to support your teams

Coach

6. 6. Monitor Monitor

and and EvaluatEvaluat

e e Results.Results.

What is our current assessment reality?

What types of data do we collect and use?

Do our assessments give us the information we need?

Is data collection efficient and systematic?

Are the assessments sensitive to change and aligned with standards?

How well do we problem-solve? Are we proficient at clearly identifying strengths and needs in student work?

Can we precisely define the problem

and make supported inferences? Can we determine what

is most urgent?

Sure we can write goals, but do we

consistently… set realistic goals? use incremental goals for

long-term success? review goals for all and

revise as needed?

▶ Is there a tight match between student needs and instruction?

Are strategies research or evidence based?

Is there a direct link between the prioritized need and the strategy selected?

Are instructional strategies used to strengthen the core before other options?

▶ Is instruction aligned across settings?

Do we always… collect both cause and effect data in progress monitoring?

thoughtfully plan progress monitors that are tied to instructional practices?

collaboratively determine criteria for success in student work?

THREE parts of indicators:◦ What will we (adults) do?◦ What will students do?◦ What will we see in students’ work if the strategy is working?

Make all descriptions explicit enough to monitor and replicate.

Understanding Antecedents of Excellence

Ach

ieve

men

t of

Res

ults

Lucky

Losing Ground

Leading

Learning

Mickey Garrison, DATA Project (mickey.garrison@douglasesd.k12.or.us)Marianne Oakes, Lane ESD (moakes@lesd.k12.or.us)Becky Stoughton, Sisters SD(becky.stoughton@sisters.k12.or.us)Missi Thurman, Centennial SD (Melissa_Thurman@centennial.k12.or.us)Penny Grotting, Columbia Gorge ESD (pgrotting@cgesd.k12.or.us)Carol Larson, Willamette ESD (carol.larson@wesd.k12.or.us)Jane Osborne, Hood River SD(j_osborne@me.com)Daymond Monteith, Klamath Falls City SD(MonteithD@kfalls.k12.or.us)Amy McQueen, David Douglas SD (amy_mcqueen@ddouglas.k12.or.usLaurie Nordahl, North Bend SD (lnordahl@nbend.k12.or.us)Dawn Bennett, Brookings SD (Dawnb@brookings.k12.or.us)Chad Putnam, Coos Bay SD (ChadP@coos-bay.k12.or.us)Jennifer Hayes, Klamath County SD (hayesj@kcsd.k12.or.us)Kristin Tompeck, Wallowa SD (ktompeck@wallowa.k12.or.us)Becky Eastland, Salem-Keizer SD (eastland_rebecca@salkeiz.k12.or.us