Post on 11-Mar-2018
1
Bruce Bartel, NEW Water Nathan Cassity, Donohue
Optimization in Practice: Case Studies from NEW Water’s
Phosphorus and TSS Optimization Plans
WWOA, 51st Annual Conference October 2017
2
Outline
Background
Phosphorus Optimization
TSS Optimization
Future/Ongoing Optimization
Acknowledgments NEW Water
• Phil Mentink
• Pat Wescott
• Jake Becken
• Bill Oldenburg
• Aaron Eichhorst
• Matt Hooker
• Jon Strandberg
• Corey Evers
CPE Services
• John Esler
• Tim Miller
Donohue
• Andrew Dow
3
Background
2014 permit renewal
Combined permit for Green Bay Facility and De Pere Facility
Part of Lower Fox River TMDL
Included mass allocation limits for P and TSS
Included 9 year compliance schedule
4
Background
NEW Water’s Permit Compliance Reports
Operational Evaluation
Report Due: June
2015
Status Report #1
Due: June 2016
Status Report #2
Due: June 2017
Operational Evaluation
Report Amendment
Due: Dec 2017
Pre-Compliance Alternatives
Plan Due: March
2018
Status Report #4
Due: June 2018
Final Compliance Alternatives
Plan Due: Dec 2018
We are here
5
Green Bay Facility (GBF)
Design: 49 MGD Current: 32 MGD
Primary Clarifiers
North Aeration
Basins
North Final Clarifiers
South Final Clarifiers
South Aeration Basins
6
De Pere Facility (DPF)
Design: 10 MGD Current: 8 MGD
Tertiary Filters
Aeration Basins
Intermediate Clarifiers
Final Clarifiers
7
Phosphorus – Combined DPF + GBF
6-month Average Limit: 68 lbs/day
8
TSS – Combined DPF + GBF
Monthly Average Limit: 2,404 lbs/day
9
Optimization Strategy
Overall Strategy:
Optimize Biological Performance
• Minimize Soluble Phosphorus Discharge
• Minimize Biological Causes of Poor Settling
Identify/Evaluate Potential Clarifier Performance Improvements
Adapt to R2E2 Changes
• Use Biological Optimization and Trouble-Shooting Tools
• Use Supplemental Chemical Polishing as Needed
Optimize Solids Removal (Minimize TSS and TP)
10
Phosphorus Optimization
11
P Optimization Highlights
Facility Modifications (Aeration Basin Selectors)
Aeration Basin Profile Sampling
Phosphorus Speciation Data Collection
12
Facility Modifications
13
Selector Sizing Modifications
Phosphorus Action Item (GBF)
Goal: Measure phosphorus performance impact of increasing selector size (additional zone)
Original selectors:
• North Plant Basins: 1 zone each, 2 mixers per zone
• South Plant Basins: 1 zone each, 1 mixer per zone
Selector Additions:
• North Plant Basins: Additional larger zone, 4 mixers each
• South Plant Basins: Additional larger zone, 2 mixers each
14
Selector Sizing Modifications
North Plant
South Plant
NEW
15
Measuring Facility Modification Impacts
Modified and Un-Modified Basin Operating Simultaneously
16
North Complex Performance
Modified Basin Put in Service
17
South Complex Performance
Modified Basin Put in Service
2
18
Aeration Basin Profile Sampling
19
Basin Profile Sampling
Phosphorus Action Item (GBF)
Goal: Develop EBPR trouble-shooting tool
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 200 400 600
Soluble Phosphorus
(mg/L)
Basin Length
P Release: Endogenous
Activity
P Release Ratio: Selector P/Influent P
Parameters of Interest:
• Soluble P
• Ammonia
• Nitrate/Nitrite
• Alkalinity
20
December Phosphorus Profiles
1 2 Middle End
1 2 Middle
End
21
January Phosphorus Profiles
1 2 Middle End
1 2 Middle
End
22
December Nitrogen Profiles
23
January Nitrogen Profiles
24
Phosphorus Speciation
25
Phosphorus Speciation Background
Phosphorus Optimization Action Item
Goals:
• Prioritize strategies for improved phosphorus removal based on the forms of phosphorus in the effluent (soluble vs. particulate, reactive vs. non-reactive)
• Measure impacts of upgrades or piloted improvements
• Document phosphorus speciation profiles in collection system and among industrial contributors to identify potential source reduction priorities
26
Phosphorus Speciation Background
Red fraction: Difficult to remove
Dark blue: Conversion to PP
Dark green: Settle/filter
Light green: Settle/filter
27
July 2016 Effluent Speciation
28
Significant Industrial User Speciation
SIU Focus, 3 Days of Composite Sampling:
29
SIU Next Steps
Talk with top contributors (SIUs) to determine sources of phosphorus
Identify pollution prevention strategies for phosphorus reduction
30
Clarifier Field Testing
31
Clarifier Testing Background
TSS Optimization Action Item
Goal: Identify hydraulic improvements through field testing to improve clarifier performance (TSS performance)
Results of testing used to identify potential clarifier improvements
32
Clarifier Field Evaluation
CPE Services
John Esler – founder and president
Specializes in clarifier field evaluations
Author of Field Testing Chapter 7 WEF MOP FD-8
33
Green Bay Facility Clarifiers
South Plant
Clarifier #4
North Plant
Clarifiers #5 & #6
#5 #6
34
Field Tests
Conducted in April 2016
Timed to fall during elevated spring flows
Dye Tracer Tests
Drogue Current Tests
Dispersed/Flocculated Suspended Solids (DSS, FSS)
Vertical Solids Profiles
35
Dye Tracer Tests
36
Dye Tracer Tests
37
Dye Tracer Tests
38
Drogue Current Measurements
39
Drogue Current Measurements
40
Vertical Solids Profiles
41
North - Dye Tracer Test Results
Imbalance in launders
42
North - Dye Tracer Test Results
North Plant Clarifier No. 5: Outside weirs favored at elevated flow
43
Drogue Current Measurements
North Plant Clarifier No. 5 at elevated flow: strong density currents
44
Identified Performance Characteristic
Supporting Field Test Data
Potential Improvement
Density currents: short-circuiting
• Drogue current
measurements
• Dye testing results
• Increase centerwell
diameter to 20-25%
• Reduce centerwell depth
• Install energy dissipating
inlet
• Install mid-radius cylindrical
baffle
Out-of-balance launder: short-circuiting
• Dye testing results
• Replace launders in Clarifier
No. 6
Inboard launder: short-circuiting at perimeter
• Dye testing results
• Replace launders with
launders attached to outer
wall
Potential Improvements – North
45
Bruce Bartel, NEW Water Nathan Cassity, Donohue
Optimization in Practice: Case Studies from NEW Water’s
Phosphorus and TSS Optimization Plans
WWOA, 51st Annual Conference October 2017