New Asset Commissioning Process at Shell

Post on 12-Feb-2017

87 views 0 download

Transcript of New Asset Commissioning Process at Shell

New Asset Commissioning and StartupA Process Approach

WebinarJune 1, 2016Tom PurvesHickory Ridge Development Company

To subscribe to the webinar series, email info@fcbpartners.com or call 617 245 0265

2©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.

2016 Webinars and Courses on the Theme of Smart Work

WebinarsTitle Date

Improving the Performance EnvironmentRobert Sher, CEO to CEO

May 11

Smart Work: Book LaunchSteve Stanton, FCB Partners May 18

Asset Commissioning & StartupTom Purves, VP Shell (ret’d) June 1

Optimizing Process AnalyticsFrank Capek, Customer Innovations June 15

Smart StrategyTim Collins, Director, Rich Products June 29

Courses

Title Date and Location

Power of ProcessSteve Stanton

Hammer CertificationNew Orleans, LAOctober 24-25

Implementation and ExecutionKay Coleman

Advanced CertificationNew Orleans, LAOctober 26-27

Leading TransformationWalter Popper

Hammer CertificationWalter PopperNew Orleans, LAOctober 26-28

For information about onsite courses and workshops call 617 245 0265 or contact us by email: info@fcbpartners.com

3©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.

The Challenge

Major Capital Asset Commissioning and Startup (CSU) activities are very intensive, highly visible and complex

CSU occurs at the point in a project where the vast majority of the money has been sunk and the owners are anxious for returns

Many different systems or approaches have been used yet success seems to depend more on individuals involved

Common belief has been that this activity is too dynamic and complex to use process thinking

Overlap with construction completion provides point of conflict

4©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.

A Recent Example

5©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.

The Evolution of C&SU Approaches

People Dependent

Contractor Led

Defined Boundaries

Lengthy Process

Custom Checklists

Inconsistent Results

Difficult Handover

Procedure Dependent

Joint Teams

Defined Boundaries

Shorter Process

Standard Checklists

Better Results

Handovers Planned

“Best Practices”

Process Driven

Owners Team

Few Boundaries

Eliminate Time Waste

Standard Checklists

Excellent Results

No Handover

Solid Foundation for Normal Operations

1980’s and Earlier 1990’s – 2000‘s 2012 (this project)

6©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.

Our Approach

Requirements

Processes To Deliver Requirements

Jobs and Tools to Execute Processes

Organization to Support People

7©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.

Operationalizing the Approach“Seamless CSU to Operation” strategy

Standard operating and maintenance processes

People who would ultimately operate and maintain the asset

Scaled up processes to use in high-demand environment

Organization in place at start of CSU

Process and hardware learned simultaneously

Clean break with construction

Result: Virtually no “handover”

8©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.

Your Turn