New Asset Commissioning Process at Shell
8
New Asset Commissioning and Startup A Process Approach Webinar June 1, 2016 Tom Purves Hickory Ridge Development Company To subscribe to the webinar series, email [email protected] or call 617 245 0265
-
Upload
fcbpartners -
Category
Business
-
view
87 -
download
0
Transcript of New Asset Commissioning Process at Shell
New Asset Commissioning and StartupA Process Approach
WebinarJune 1, 2016Tom PurvesHickory Ridge Development Company
To subscribe to the webinar series, email [email protected] or call 617 245 0265
2©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.
2016 Webinars and Courses on the Theme of Smart Work
WebinarsTitle Date
Improving the Performance EnvironmentRobert Sher, CEO to CEO
May 11
Smart Work: Book LaunchSteve Stanton, FCB Partners May 18
Asset Commissioning & StartupTom Purves, VP Shell (ret’d) June 1
Optimizing Process AnalyticsFrank Capek, Customer Innovations June 15
Smart StrategyTim Collins, Director, Rich Products June 29
Courses
Title Date and Location
Power of ProcessSteve Stanton
Hammer CertificationNew Orleans, LAOctober 24-25
Implementation and ExecutionKay Coleman
Advanced CertificationNew Orleans, LAOctober 26-27
Leading TransformationWalter Popper
Hammer CertificationWalter PopperNew Orleans, LAOctober 26-28
For information about onsite courses and workshops call 617 245 0265 or contact us by email: [email protected]
3©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.
The Challenge
Major Capital Asset Commissioning and Startup (CSU) activities are very intensive, highly visible and complex
CSU occurs at the point in a project where the vast majority of the money has been sunk and the owners are anxious for returns
Many different systems or approaches have been used yet success seems to depend more on individuals involved
Common belief has been that this activity is too dynamic and complex to use process thinking
Overlap with construction completion provides point of conflict
4©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.
A Recent Example
5©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.
The Evolution of C&SU Approaches
People Dependent
Contractor Led
Defined Boundaries
Lengthy Process
Custom Checklists
Inconsistent Results
Difficult Handover
Procedure Dependent
Joint Teams
Defined Boundaries
Shorter Process
Standard Checklists
Better Results
Handovers Planned
“Best Practices”
Process Driven
Owners Team
Few Boundaries
Eliminate Time Waste
Standard Checklists
Excellent Results
No Handover
Solid Foundation for Normal Operations
1980’s and Earlier 1990’s – 2000‘s 2012 (this project)
6©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.
Our Approach
Requirements
Processes To Deliver Requirements
Jobs and Tools to Execute Processes
Organization to Support People
7©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.
Operationalizing the Approach“Seamless CSU to Operation” strategy
Standard operating and maintenance processes
People who would ultimately operate and maintain the asset
Scaled up processes to use in high-demand environment
Organization in place at start of CSU
Process and hardware learned simultaneously
Clean break with construction
Result: Virtually no “handover”
8©2016 FCB Partners. All rights reserved.
Your Turn
