Post on 24-May-2018
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
(C) 2015 Michigan State University 1
Food Fraud what it is, why it is important, why now
Food Protection Forum Ministry for Primary Industries, NZ
Monday, October 12, 2015 Session 3 – Food Defense – 11:40 to 1:10
Auckland, New Zealand
John Spink, PhDDirector & Assistant Professor, Food Fraud Initiative
www.FoodFraud.MSU.edu Twitter @FoodFraud and #FoodFraud
*
2
Massive Open Online Course (MOOC – free, open, online)• November 2 & 6 Bi-Lingual English-Mandarin, May 2016 • Free, open, online, open to everyone, includes a ‘certificate of completion’
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
Executive Education (Short-Course)• Food Fraud, Quantifying Food Risk
• September 21-22/ 23-24; Feb 1-2/ 3-4, 2016
Graduate Courses (Online, Three Credits)• Anti-Counterfeit & Product Protection (Food Fraud)
• Quantifying Food Risk (including Food Fraud)
• Food Protection and Defense (Packaging Module)
• Packaging for Food Safety
Graduate Certificate (Online, Four Courses Each)• Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention (Food Safety)
Master of Science in Food Safety (Online)• www.online.FoodSafety.msu.edu
Food Fraud Curriculum
© 2015 Michigan State Universitywww.FoodFraud.msu.edu
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
(C) 2015 Michigan State University 2
© 2015 Michigan State University
3
Introducing Food Fraud including translation and interpretation to Russian, Korean, and Chinese languages食品欺诈介绍,翻译成俄语、韩语和中文
• Translation by local scholars and food safety experts
• 由各国食品安全专家和学者翻译
• Reference in their language (country)
• 为不同语言的国家提供参考信息
• Future translations planned
• 计划下一篇文章翻译
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
Defining Food Fraud• Action: Deception Using Food for Economic Gain
– Including the sub-category of “Economically Motivated Adulteration” or EMA– Note: FDA currently defines EMA as a “substance” for “economic gain”– Consistent with GFSI, EC/EU, UK, ISO, and others…
• Motivation: Economic Gain – “Food Defense” motivation is traditionally harm or terror
• Effect:– Economic Threat –Consumers and Governments expect Food Agency Controls– Public Health Vulnerability or Threat
Examples• Horsemeat in ground beef• Peanut Corporation selling known
contaminated product• Diluted or extra virgin olive oil• Melamine in pet food and infant formula• Over-icing with unsanitary water
• Unauthorized unsanitary repackaging (up-labeling or origin-laundering)
• Cargo Theft reintroduced into commerce/ Stolen products
• Expired product date code tampering or “refreshing”
Reference: Spink & Moyer (2011). Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud, Journal of Food Science
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu © 2015 Michigan State University 4
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
(C) 2015 Michigan State University 3
Source: Food Fraud Think Tank Presentation, GFSI, 2012, 2013, 2014
TamperingOver-Runs
What is Food Fraud?
Food Fraud
Dilution Contaminant
Grey Market/ Theft/ DiversionCounterfeiting
Unapproved Enhancements
Mislabeling
Substitution
FDA/FR* “Economically Motivated Adulteration”
All FraudUK, EU, GFSI, China, ISO…
© 2015 Michigan State University
5www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
The Food Risk Matrix
Action
IntentionalUnintentional
Harm: Public Health, Economic, or
Terror
Food Defense
Food Safety
Motivation
Gain: Economic
Food Fraud(1)
Food Quality
Prevent by Understanding the Motivation
Source: Adapted from: Spink (2006), The Counterfeit Food and Beverage Threat, Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO), Annual Meeting 2006; Spink, J. & Moyer, DC (2011) Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud, Journal of Food Science, November 2011
Fo
od
Sec
uri
ty
© 2015 Michigan State University 6www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
(C) 2015 Michigan State University 4
© 2015 Michigan State University 7www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
© 2015 Michigan State University 8
China: Food Safety Law中华人民共和国食品安全法
(Baltimore, USA)
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
(C) 2015 Michigan State University 5
Acknowledgements• MSU Veterinary Medicine: Dean Christopher Brown, Chair Dan Grooms, Chair Ray Geor, Dr. Wilson Rumbeiha,
Cindy Wilson, Dean John Baker• MSU Global: Associate Provost/ Executive Director Christine Geith, Jerry Rhead, Gwyn Shelle, Lauren Zavala,
Associate Provost/ EVP Dr. Karen Klomparens, Rashad Muhammad• Queens’s University Belfast (UK): Professor & Director Christopher Elliott, Dr. Moira Dean, Dr. Michael Hollis• MSU Online Master’s of Science in Food Safety: Director Melinda Wilkins, Ex-Director Julie Funk, Kristi Denbrock,
Heather Ricks, Peggy Trommater, Heidi Chen, Dr. Gary Ades, Chair Ray Goer• MSU Food Science: Chair Fred Derksen, Les Bourquin, Bradley Marks, Felicia Wu, VP of Research Ian Gray, David
Ortega, Gale Strasburg• MSU Program in Public Health: Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyer• MSU NFSTC: Dr. Scott Winterstein, Trent Wakenight,, Dr. Kevin Walker, Sandy Enness, Jen Sysak, Dr. Rick Foster,
to name a few critical contributors and supporters. • MSU Food Safety Policy Center: Dr. Ewen Todd• MSU School of Packaging: Dr. Bruce Harte, Dr. Robb Clarke, Dr. Laura Bix, Dr. Paul Singh, Dr. Diana Twede, Dr.
Gary Burgess, Dr. Harold Hughes, Dr. Mark Uebersax, Dennis Young, and Director Joseph Hotchkiss• MSU Communication Arts/ Consumer Behavior: Dr. Maria Lapinski and Dr. Nora Rifon• MSU Criminal Justice: Dr. Jeremy Wilson, Director Ed McGarrell, Dr. Justin Heinonen, Roy Fenoff, Zoltan Fejas,
Barbara Sayre, and Sara Heeg• MSU Supply Chain Management: Dr. Cheryl Speier, Dr. Ken Boyer, Dr. John MacDonald, Chair David Closs, Dr.
Stan Griffis, Dr. Judy Whipple• MSU College Social Science: Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwell• MSU College of Law: Dr. Neil Fortin and Dr. Peter Yu• MSU Libraries: Anita Ezzo, Nancy Lucas, Kara Gust• MSU International Programs: Dr. Mary Anne Walker, Dr. John Whimms• State of Michigan’s Ag & Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee: Dr. John Tilden, Brad Deacon, Gerald
Wojtala, Byron Beerbower• The Citadel: Dr. Roy Fenoff
© 2015 Michigan State University 10www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
(C) 2015 Michigan State University 6
DiscussionJohn Spink, PhD
SpinkJ@msu.edu
Twitter: Food Fraud and #FoodFraud
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu 11© 2015 Michigan State University
Food Fraud Global Trends and
Prevention StrategiesFood Protection Forum Ministry for Primary Industries, NZ
Monday, October 13, 2015 <>
Auckland, New Zealand
John Spink, PhDDirector & Assistant Professor, Food Fraud Initiative
www.FoodFraud.MSU.edu Twitter @FoodFraud and #FoodFraud
*
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
(C) 2015 Michigan State University 7
Defining Food Fraud• Action: Deception Using Food for Economic Gain
– Including the sub-category of “Economically Motivated Adulteration” or EMA– Note: FDA currently defines EMA as a “substance” for “economic gain”– Consistent with GFSI, EC/EU, UK, China, ISO, and others…
• Motivation: Economic Gain – “Food Defense” motivation is traditionally harm or terror
• Effect:– Economic Threat –Consumers and Governments expect Food Agency Controls– Public Health Vulnerability or Threat
Examples• Horsemeat in ground beef• Peanut Corporation selling known
contaminated product• Diluted or extra virgin olive oil• Melamine in pet food and infant formula• Over-icing with unsanitary water
• Unauthorized unsanitary repackaging (up-labeling or origin-laundering)
• Cargo Theft reintroduced into commerce/ Stolen products
• Expired product date code tampering or “refreshing”
Reference: Spink & Moyer (2011). Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud, Journal of Food Science
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu © 2015 Michigan State University 13
FDA Food Protection Plan
• Prevention– increasing corporate responsibility to prevent food-borne
illnesses – identifying food vulnerabilities and assess risks – expanding the understanding and use of effective mitigation
measures
• Intervention– focus inspections and sampling based on risk – enhance risk-based surveillance – improve the detection of food system “signals” that indicate
contamination
• Response– improve immediate response – improve risk communications to the public, industry and other
stakeholders(FDA Food Protection Plan, Fact Sheet, 2008)
Adulteration
Food Protection
REMOVE
FS FD
Prevent
FF
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu © 2015 Michigan State University 14
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
(C) 2015 Michigan State University 8
Global Activities – September 2015• UK Elliott Review (Food Fraud/ Food Crime)• EC Resolution on Food Fraud, and EP Focus (Food Fraud)
– Food Integrity Project
• Interpol Operation Opson I, II, III (Food Crime/ IP)• GFSI Guidance Document
– Food Fraud Think Tank/ Food Fraud Mitigation Position Paper
– Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment Workshop
• PAS 96 Food Defence (Intentional), plus…• ISO TC 247 Fraud Countermeasures and Controls• GMA: Brand Protection, Consumer Product Fraud
– EMA/FF Tool -- TBD
• US Pharmacopeia/ Food Chemicals Codex (Adulteration)• Chinese Food Safety Laws – April announce, October Implement
– Traditional and non-traditional, prevention– 13th Five-Year Plan
• Corporate Processes and Systems– Quality/ Six Sigma; Enterprise Risk Management/ Chief Risk Officer, COSO principles
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu © 2015 Michigan State University 15
USA Activities – September 2015• GAO Fruit Juice Adulteration (1996) “Economic Adulteration”
• GAO Seafood Fraud (2/2009)
• CRS Seafood Fraud (2009)
• FDA Public Meeting on EMA (5/2009) “Economically Motivated Adulteration”
• FSMA (1/2011) – Overall and section on “Intentional Adulteration” (IA)
• GAO Report on EMA (10/2011) “Prevent all threats”
• GMA Consumer Product Fraud report (1/2011)
• FSMA IA Rule (12/2013 open, closed 2/2014) “EMA” to Food Safety/ Preventative Controls
• CRS Seafood Fraud (2013)
• FSMA Third-Party Certifications
• CRS Report on Food Fraud (1/2014) “Food Fraud”
• FSMA PC Rule (Final, EMA open - 9/2014; publish draft 8/2015)
• Presidential Task Force on Seafood Fraud (8/2014)
• FSMA IA/PC (8/2014) (Food Defense/Food Safety): Limited resources so limited scope
• FSMA PC Rule: aspects pertaining to EMA/Food Fraud, in the Final Rule so no open comment period
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu © 2015 Michigan State University 16
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
(C) 2015 Michigan State University 9
FSMA IA Update
Public Meetings 2013/2014• IA narrows to only “catastrophic event”
(traditional Food Defense, terrorism)
• Disgruntled employees and EMA to Preventative Controls
• FDA is seeking comments on where and how EMA (including Food Fraud) should be addressed (Final PC Rule published in September 2015)
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu © 2015 Michigan State University 17
FSMA-PC Rule and Food Fraud/EMA
Conclusions
1. Must address Food Fraud/EMA that could lead to a health hazard
2. FSMA-PC Rule is not the only Food Fraud regulation
3. It appears that current broad Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Food Fraud Prevention Plan activities will lead to compliance with FSMA-PC regarding Food Fraud/EMA
18www.FoodFraud.msu.edu © 2015 Michigan State University
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
(C) 2015 Michigan State University 10
Keyword SearchThe keyword search quickly conveys how much attention is given to FF/EMA in the FSMA-PC Final Rule. The Human Foods document contains 906 pages and the Animal Foods document has an additional 666 pages. Overall there at over 470,000 words in the two Final Rule documents. Listed below are keywords associated with FF/EMA including the number of times they are mentioned in the two documents.
• Reasonably Likely to Occur: 21 mentions
• Reasonably Foreseeable Hazard: 123 mentions
• Fraud or Fraudulent: 12 mentions
– (Food Fraud: 0 mentions)
• Economically Motivated Adulteration: 40 mentions
– (“EMA”: 0 mentions)
• Adulteration: 140 mentions
• Adulterated: 202 mentions
– (Adulterant: 0 mentions)
19
FSMA-PC Rule and Food Fraud/EMA
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu © 2015 Michigan State University
Acknowledgements• MSU Veterinary Medicine: Dean Christopher Brown, Chair Dan Grooms, Chair Ray Geor, Dr. Wilson Rumbeiha,
Cindy Wilson, Dean John Baker• MSU Global: Associate Provost/ Executive Director Christine Geith, Jerry Rhead, Gwyn Shelle, Lauren Zavala,
Associate Provost/ EVP Dr. Karen Klomparens, Rashad Muhammad• Queens’s University Belfast (UK): Professor & Director Christopher Elliott, Dr. Moira Dean, Dr. Michael Hollis• MSU Online Master’s of Science in Food Safety: Director Melinda Wilkins, Ex-Director Julie Funk, Kristi Denbrock,
Heather Ricks, Peggy Trommater, Heidi Chen, Dr. Gary Ades, Chair Ray Goer• MSU Food Science: Chair Fred Derksen, Les Bourquin, Bradley Marks, Felicia Wu, VP of Research Ian Gray, David
Ortega, Gale Strasburg• MSU Program in Public Health: Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyer• MSU NFSTC: Dr. Scott Winterstein, Trent Wakenight,, Dr. Kevin Walker, Sandy Enness, Jen Sysak, Dr. Rick Foster,
to name a few critical contributors and supporters. • MSU Food Safety Policy Center: Dr. Ewen Todd• MSU School of Packaging: Dr. Bruce Harte, Dr. Robb Clarke, Dr. Laura Bix, Dr. Paul Singh, Dr. Diana Twede, Dr.
Gary Burgess, Dr. Harold Hughes, Dr. Mark Uebersax, Dennis Young, and Director Joseph Hotchkiss• MSU Communication Arts/ Consumer Behavior: Dr. Maria Lapinski and Dr. Nora Rifon• MSU Criminal Justice: Dr. Jeremy Wilson, Director Ed McGarrell, Dr. Justin Heinonen, Dr. Robyn Mace, Roy Fenoff,
Zoltan Fejas, Barbara Sayre, and Sara Heeg• MSU Supply Chain Management: Dr. Cheryl Speier, Dr. Ken Boyer, Dr. John MacDonald, Chair David Closs, Dr.
Stan Griffis, Dr. Judy Whipple• MSU College Social Science: Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwell• MSU College of Law: Dr. Neil Fortin and Dr. Peter Yu• MSU Libraries: Anita Ezzo, Nancy Lucas, Kara Gust• MSU International Programs: Dr. Mary Anne Walker, Dr. John Whimms• State of Michigan’s Ag & Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee: Dr. John Tilden, Brad Deacon, Gerald
Wojtala, Byron Beerbower• The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina): Dr. Roy Fenoff
20www.FoodFraud.msu.edu © 2015 Michigan State University
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
(C) 2015 Michigan State University 11
DiscussionJohn Spink, PhD
SpinkJ@msu.edu
Twitter: Food Fraud and #FoodFraud
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu
21www.FoodFraud.msu.edu © 2015 Michigan State University
www.FoodFraud.msu.edu © 2015 Michigan State University 22
APPENDIX: Overview presented October 12, 2015, MPI/NZ