Post on 16-Jul-2015
Introduction
Cerdanyola
Demo Site
Features
Mike Barker mbarker@cimne.upc.edu
JORNADA INFORMATIVA, ENERGÍA INTELIGENTE PARA EUROPA (EIE)
CONVOCATORIA 2013, Madrid, 31 de enero 2013
Proyecto EMPOWER
“Empowering customers to save energy by
informative billing”
GUIÓN
• Presentación CIMNE
• Resumen del proyecto EMPOWER
• Análisis del proceso de preparación de la
propuesta
• Conclusiones
GUIÓN
• Presentación CIMNE
• Resumen del proyecto EMPOWER
• Análisis del proceso de preparación de la
propuesta
• Conclusiones
The Building Energy and Environment Group (BEE) is an autonomous research unit
of CIMNE. It was founded in 2001.
EU supported projects:
AIDA - Affirmative Integrated Energy Design Action,
http://www.aidaproject.eu/
BECA – Balanced European Conservation Approach – ICT services for
resource saving in social housing, http://www.beca-project.eu
Build up - the European web portal for energy efficiency in buildings,
http://www.buildup.eu/
eSESH- Saving Energy in Social Housing with ICT., http://www.esesh.eu
SEMANCO - Semantic Technologies For Carbon Reduction In Urban
Planning, http://semanco-project.eu/index.htm
SmartSpaces - Saving Energy in Europe's Public Buildings Using ICT,
http://www.smartspaces.eu
Start up company: INERGY (http://inergybcn.com/)
CIMNE BEEGROUP
GUIÓN
• Presentación CIMNE
• Resumen del proyecto EMPOWER
• Análisis del proceso de preparación de la
propuesta
• Conclusiones
Empower
• Objetivo: – “to empower consumers by involving and informing them, helping
them take measures to save energy on the basis of the information
they read on their meters or on their bills.”
• Presupuesto (en negociación): – Coste total: 2M€
– Suporte UE: 1,5M€ (75%)
• Consorcio: – 12 participants from 5 EU members states (Be, Dk, Es, Fr, It).
• four utility companies (Dk, Es, Fr, It)
• in a well balanced team with R&D specialists and social agents
representing the target group.
• Duración: 30 meses
• to implement more informative billing
services as the basis for energy
performance improvement programmes
and the development of energy services.
EMPOWER Coverage of services
HESPUL (FR)
Technical support
CIMNE (ES)
Analysis engine
Polito (IT)
Evaluation and
analysis
ALEC (FR)
Social support
GISCE (ES)
Metering and
billing
Sinergie (IT)
Socio-economic
study
Reggio Emilia
(IT) End user
perspective
Power-link (BE)
Communication EnergiMidit
Denmark
EL-GAS
Spain
GEG
France
IREN
Italy
• over 270 000 consumers will be involved.
• to save up to 25% of the approximately 20% baseload
household electricity consumption not addressed by
other energy efficiency measures.
Experimental group, 244890
Control Group, 27.210
153.000 Denmark81.000 France
2.790 Italy8.100 Spain
17.000 Denmark9.000 France
310 Italy900 Spain
Test group800
200 Denmark200 France200 Italy200 Spain
GUIÓN
• Presentación CIMNE
• Resumen del proyecto EMPOWER
• Análisis del proceso de preparación de la
propuesta
• Conclusiones
El PROCESO EN EL TIEMPO
• Idea / concepto /necesidad
• Propuesta de proyecto
• Convocatoria adecuada
• Esbozo de propuesta
• Investigación de interés
• Construcción y consolidación del consorcio
• Desarrollo de la propuesta
• Revisión y control de calidad
• Entrega
LOS FACTORES CRÍTICOS
• La convocatoria
• La sección / área / acción
• El estado del arte
• Las prioridades a nivel EU/nacional/local
• Los 5 criterios de evaluación
• La puntuación y los umbrales
CRITERIOS Y PUNCTUACIÖN
10: Excelente…completamente en línea con el criterio
8-9: Muy bien…aunque podría haber sido aún mejor
7: Bien…pero mejoras necesarias
6: Suficiente pero necesita mejoras importantes
4-5: Insuficiente : debilidades insalvables
2-3: Lamentable: muy débil / errores de fondo.
1: Terrible: mal enfocada y/o superficial
5 Criterios:
1 Relevancia 2 Calidad 3 Impacto 4 Valor EU 5 Recursos
En resumen….
El reto
La respuesta / solución
que proponemos…
Concretamos en que
consiste la acción
Especificamos los resultados
concretos y medibles
Detallamos el porque del consorcio
…en el contexto de la
convocatoria
Los criterios de evaluación
• 1. Relevance of the proposed action
a) extent to which the proposed action is
consistent with the IEE II Call priorities;
b) extent to which the proposed action responds
to important user needs and market barriers;
c) extent to which the proposed action
complements other related activities.
Los criterios de evaluación
• 2. Quality of implementation
methodology (score 0-10), including:
a) suitability of the proposed approach and
extent to which the proposed action engages
the target groups and stakeholders;
b) clarity of the work packages, project planning
and suitability of performance monitoring;
c) quality of communication plan for the uptake
of solution(s).
Engagement of target group….
(a) Target Group(s) How will the target group(s) benefit from this action? Key task(s) nº from your work programme Name of organisation(s) providing a Letter of Support (Country)
Direct Consumer representatives
Housing / tenants agents
Provision of models for empowerment services that can be applied to other
utility services.
Gaining of good practice examples to help in other programmes for
awareness raising and in collaboration with energy service companies
T2.3 User expectation
WP3-4 – Response to initial and definitive service provisions
WP4, WP6, WP7
ATC Torino – Housing company Italy
CNL Isère (Tenants Union) France
UFC (Consumers’ association) France
ECC - European Customer Centre Belgium
Indirect Consumer representatives
Public authorities
Provision of models and examples (see above).
Insight into the possibilities for public participation and empowerment in
smart cities and communities through smart metering
T2.5 Legal and reg. issues
WP3-4 – Response to initial and definitive service provisions
WP4, WP6, WP7
City of Grenoble France
Province of Turin / Torino Italy
City of Turin Italy
Government of Catalonia Spain
Energy efficiency agencies / organisations New tools to enable more precise targeting of awareness raising and capacity
building campaigns
WP3-4 – Response to initial and definitive service provisions WP4,
WP6, WP7
IREA Regional organisation for energy efficiency and renewable
energy (EE & RES)
France
CLER Umbrella organisation for EE & RES France
FNCCR Umbrella organisation for EE & RES France
(b) Key Actor(s)
How will the key actor(s) contribute to this action? Key task(s) nº from your work programme Name of organisation(s) providing a Letter of Support (Country)
Utility companies Feedback: contrasting the services developed with their own business
models and metering systems.
Validation: responding to surveys about business opportunities in their
markets
T2.4 Use cases for service operation
WP3-4 – Response to initial and definitive service provisions
WP6, WP7
Wase Wind Belgium
Ecopower (utility) Belgium
SOMENERGIA (utility) Spain
Dragefossen Norway
Energy sector associations Validation: responding to surveys about business opportunities in their
markets
Communication: informing members and facilitating contacts
T2.5 Legal and reg. issues
WP7
Danish Energy Association Denmark
ELE – Union of local energy agencies France
ASEME (Electricity Companies association) Spain
Energy sector industrial companies Feedback: contrasting the services developed with their own business
models and metering systems
WP6, WP7
AG EOS Belgium
Los criterios de evaluación
• 3. Ambition and credibility of the
impacts of the proposed action
a) services / outcomes produced by the action
(deliverables, hours of training, etc.);
b) impact within and beyond the project lifetime
assessed with specific, measurable,
accepted, realistic and time-dependent
(SMART) indicators;
c) sustainability of the solutions offered by the
proposed action beyond the project lifetime.
Los criterios de evaluación
• 4. EU added value
a) a evidence that collaboration / team working
across national borders will lead to greater
benefits than separate actions at national /
local level in the same countries
b) appropriate geographical focus of the
proposed action including learning and
exchanges among stakeholders;
c) transferability of the solutions offered by the
proposed action.
Los criterios de evaluación
• 5. Resources allocated to the proposed
action
a) management and composition of the team,
balance of skills, experience, and
responsibilities;
b) appropriate levels of hours per partner and
per work package;
c) justification of costs (sub-contracts, travel
costs, and other specific costs) and co-
financing.
GUIÓN
• Presentación CIMNE
• Resumen del proyecto EMPOWER
• Análisis del proceso de preparación de la
propuesta
• Conclusiones
Conclusiones 1/2
• Asegurarse que la convocatoria coincide
con su experiencia/estrategia.
• Empezar con tiempo (4 meses o más.
• Utilizar todos los medios disponibles para
contrastar ideas y formar el mejor consorcio
posible.
• Haz caso a la documentación de la
convocatoria.
Conclusiones 2/2
• Implica todos los socios en el desarrollo de
la propuesta.
• Explicar en la propuesta cómo se
involucrarán otros agentes.
• Saber explicar porqué el proyecto se tiene
que ejecutar a nivel Europeo.
• Definir objetivos, cuantificar indicadores e
impactos.
• Contrastar la propuesta con los criterios de
evaluación (si es posible por un tercero).