Post on 26-Jul-2020
MEETING DATE TIME LOCATION
Park Commission
Monday, November 13, 2017
5:00 p.m.
Grand Chute Town Hall 1900 Grand Chute Blvd Board Room
A. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA/ORDER OF THE DAY
D. PUBLIC INPUT Members of the public are welcome to address the Commission. Individuals wishing to speak on an item (whether on the agenda or not) must sign in prior to the start of the meeting and may speak during the Public Input segment of the meeting. This segment is placed early in the agenda so that the public may make their comments prior to any discussion or action by the Commission or Town Board. Individual comments are limited to no more than three minutes each. The Public Input section is limited to a total of 15 minutes. The Commission/Town Board may suspend this rule if deemed necessary. Once the public input segment ends there will be no additional discussion from the audience. Note regarding non-agendized Town related matters: Pursuant to WI Statutes 19.83(2) and 19.84(2), the public may present matters; however, they cannot be discussed or acted upon until specific notice of the subject matter of the proposed action can be given.
E. MINUTES 1. Approve Regular Meeting minutes – October 9, 2017.
F. REPORTS
1. Park Maintenance Report – Attached 2. Director’s Memo – Attached 3. Greenways Report - Verbal 4. Town Board Liaison Report - Verbal 5. Correspondence Report – Verbal
G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
H. NEW BUSINESS
1. Discuss TAP Grant 2. Bike Fix It Station 3. Discuss new sign for Lions Park
I. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
J. ADJOURNMENT
Accommodation Notice Any person requiring special accommodation who wishes to attend this meeting should
contact (Public Works at 832-1581) at least 48 hours in advance.
1 S:\DPW\Park Commission\Minutes\2017\October\100917.docx 10/30/2017
PARK COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES – TOWN OF GRAND CHUTE– 1900 W. GRAND CHUTE BLVD., GRAND CHUTE, WI – October 9, 2017
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Meeting called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Karen Petersen, presiding President.
PRESENT: Joy Hagen, John Jones, Karen Petersen, Mike Schmidt, Nathan Scott, Supervisor Thyssen
EXCUSESD: Jennifer Buelow-Fischer, Larry Carey, Kathryn Pennings
STAFF: Tom Marquardt, Public Works Director, Karen Heyrman, Public Works Deputy Director, Lisa Mroczkowski, Park Commission Recording Secretary, Mike Arft, Park Foreman
OTHERS: Jim March, Town Administrator Pat & Frank Severin, 3400 W Heritage Dr., Grand Chute, WI 54914
APPROVAL OF AGENDA/ORDER OF THE DAY
Motion (Schmidt/Jones) to approve. Motion carried. (5/0) PUBLIC INPUT
Pat Severin, 3400 W. Heritage Dr., Grand Chute, WI- Pat spoke on agenda item number one under “Unfinished Business”. Pat stated she is glad the Town of Grand Chute has approved a sidewalk poetry program. Pat stated she would like to see the authors name as part of the poem.
APPROVAL OF REGULAR PARK COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES – SEPTEMBER 11, 2017
Motion (Hagen/Schmidt) to approve minutes. Motion Carried. (5/0) Accept Monthly Reports:
Park Maintenance Mike Arft stated staff has been doing general maintenance at all the parks. Landscaping was done at Carter Woods Park by the new parking lot and also by the sign to the park. A new section of trail was cut out on the east side of the eastern most cell at Lecker Park for the fat tire bike trails. The blue lion will be installed at the entrance to Lions Park. There were too many utilities at the location along Lynndale Dr. Three red dogwood shrubs were planted on the berm at Maple Edge Park. A new slide was installed at Prairie Hill Park. The old one was starting to separate at the seam and staff felt it was a safety hazard.
Mike stated we continue to have a woodpecker problem at Patriot Park.
Commissioner Schmidt suggested the Town look at putting vinyl siding on the building or we will continue to have the same problem each year.
2 S:\DPW\Park Commission\Minutes\2017\October\100917.docx 10/30/2017
Director’s Memo Deputy Director Heyrman stated the Fox Valley Mountain Bike Club has started work on the single track bike trail at Prairie Hill Park.
Deputy Director Heyrman stated the Misty Lane water tower will be the primary receiving station for the Town’s wireless communication. Fiber to Lions Park and Fire Station #1 has been installed. The remainder of the locations will be finished in 2018.
Deputy Director Heyrman gave an update on the Town Center Park. She stated there was one additional change order for the Town Center Park since the Park Commission last met. It was in the amount of $1,499 to add a quazite box and PVC pipe for the cameras and audio visual equipment ($944) and to add electrical conduit to the island for the future park sign ($555). Sanitary and water main connections will be done on Tuesday October 10.
Deputy Director Heyrman stated the fund raising team met on October 7 and reviewed the donation brochure. The Town’s Attorney is reviewing the terms of the rental agreement. His comments and suggestions will be brought to the next fund raising team meeting on October 19. The agreement will go to the Town Board meeting on November 7, 2017 for approval.
Commissioner Schmidt asked when donations and naming right donations are made, will that money be earmarked only for the new park.
Deputy Director Heyrman stated the Park Commission would need to approve that but the original thought was the donations would offset future phases of development to the park.
Deputy Director Heyrman stated the pickleball courts are complete. We have had a lot of positive feedback from residents about the courts.
Deputy Director Heyrman stated a letter was sent out to area baseball and softball clubs for feedback on the proposed third field at Carter Woods Park.
Greenways Report Commissioner Hagen stated Greenways continues to work on the policy for the Fox River Greenways Trail.
Town Board Liaison Report Supervisor Thyssen stated the Town Board approved the update to ordinance O-15-2017 amending Chapter 515-15, Bicycles, electric personal assistive mobility devices, and play vehicles. He stated this ordinance change will help make Capitol Drive, east of Richmond Street, safe for pedestrians who walk in the bike lane.
Director Marquardt stated there will be signs installed stating that bikes must yield to pedestrians.
Supervisor Thyssen stated the other item he wanted to share with the Park Commission was the Board’s discussion on the changing of polling locations because of state requirements. The Town Clerk is looking to use the new park building as a polling location. Supervisor Thyssen stated he brings this up because of the request he made to the Park Commission regarding Valley Transit service being extending to the Town Hall.
The Park Commission reviewed samples of tables and chairs provided by four vendors.
3 S:\DPW\Park Commission\Minutes\2017\October\100917.docx 10/30/2017
Correspondence Report None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(R/B 4/10/17) Sidewalk Poetry Program Lisa provided background to the Park Commission on the sidewalk poetry program from previous meetings. She stated at the April 10 meeting the program was approved. The Park Commission requested staff bring the final program details and budget recommendation back to the Park Commission for final review. Lisa reviewed the Sidewalk Poem Program criteria to the Park Commission.
Commissioner Hagen stated she feels adding the authors name to the poem is worthy of discussion. She does not see a problem with including the authors name in the poem.
Commissioner Jones stated there would have to be research done on each poem submitted to make sure there is no plagiarism.
Deputy Director Heyrman stated she agrees and that is stated in the program criteria. She further stated because the funding for this would come out of the Public Works budget it would need to go before the Town Board for approval. The $1,000 cost is for the stamp and imprinting the concrete. Poems would be placed in areas where the town is replacing sidewalk or areas where the Town is installing new sidewalk.
Commissioner Scott stated one concern with including the authors name is if, in the future, the author of a poem did something in poor taste or had legal problems, the Town would not be able to remove the name.
Motion (Hagen/Schmidt) to approve staff recommendation that the Park Commission recommend to the Town Board to approve including an amount not to exceed $1,000 in the Department of Public Works Curb, Gutter, and Concrete Repair Budget to fund the Sidewalk Poetry Program and the author of the poem have the choice to include their name. Motion Carried. (5/0)
NEW BUSINESS
Approve Cable Television in New Town Park Deputy Director Heyrman stated this request comes from IT Director Heimann. He was informed by Spectrum that because of the distance between the Town Hall and the new park building and the different type of cable needed, Spectrum must create a new installation work order and they would not be able to offer the free cable service that the Town’s facilities currently have. The cost for monthly cable service is $59.99. Currently there are no other parks that have cable television. Motion (Schmidt/Jones) to approve Cable Television for the New Town Center Park. Motion Carried. (5/0)
4 S:\DPW\Park Commission\Minutes\2017\October\100917.docx 10/30/2017
Discuss baseline fencing for the ball diamonds at Carter Woods Park Deputy Director Heyrman stated a barrier net systems was included in the Master Plan for Carter Woods Park for the baselines of both diamonds. The barrier net systems for the first baselines of both diamonds, was part of the AWBC donation to Carter Woods Park at a cost of $9,000. AWBC came to staff a few months ago with a less costly alternative netting system which they could purchase out of their fund balance of $4,000. Staff requested they bring a sample for staff to look at and consider. AWBC supplied a location where the alternate netting is being used but did not provide a sample of the netting for staff to look at. Deputy Director Heyrman stated she had noticed other ball diamonds in the area that had fencing the full length of the first and third baselines. This fencing was the same height as the backstop. Staff discussed this option instead of the netting. Staff felt replacing the current fence with a fence that is the same height as the backstop fences along the first and third baselines of both diamonds would be less maintenance and less labor intensive. She stated the cost to install the fence on all four baselines is $22,160.76. The 2017 CIP included $55,600 for the improvements to Carter Woods Park. To date we have spent $41,900 leaving a balance of $13,700. Of that balance, $12,000 was for electrical work for the installation of the batting cages and score boards which will not be completed in 2017. Deputy Director Heyrman stated the contractor would give a $1,500 discount if all four baselines were done at the same time. Deputy Director Heyrman stated there is $9,000 in the 2018 CIP for the Town to install the netting along the third baselines of both diamonds at Carter Woods Park. Deputy Director Heyrman stated staff is recommending the Park Commission recommend to the Town Board to utilize the 2017 CIP remaining funds of $13,700 which was for the site electrical work to fund the baseline fencing on the first and third baselines of the north ball diamond in 2017. Commissioner Schmidt asked if the site electrical work will need to be installed in the future. Deputy Director Heyrman stated if the AWBC were to come up with the funding for the batting cages and scoreboards, the Town could ask them to include the funding for the electrical work in their fundraising campaign.
Commissioner Hagen stated it’s important to deal with safety issues. She feels it makes sense to install all of the fences.
Supervisor Thyssen stated the worst case scenario is the Town Board says no.
Motion (Hagen/Scott) to recommend to the Town Board to reallocate the balance of the 2017 CIP Carter Woods improvement funds of $13,700 to install fencing along the first and third baseline of the north field and also to recommend the Town Board approve a budget adjustment of $9,000 from the 2018 CIP to be used in 2017 to complete all four baseline fences and take advantage of the contractor discount of $1,500. Motion Carried. (5/0)
5 S:\DPW\Park Commission\Minutes\2017\October\100917.docx 10/30/2017
ADJOURNMENT
Motion (Scott/Jones) to adjourn. Motion carried. (5/0) Meeting adjourned at 5:47 p.m.
These are draft minutes taken at a regular meeting held on October 9, 2017 by: Lisa Mroczkowski, Park Commission Recording Secretary, Town of Grand Chute.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1900 W Grand Chute Blvd, Grand Chute WI 54913
PH. 920-832-1581 FAX 920-832-6036 www.grandchute.net
MEMORANDUM
TO: Park Commission FROM: Mike Arft, Park Foreman DATE: November 13, 2017 RE: Park Maintenance Report Parks
• We have been doing some general maintenance along with some grass cutting and mulching the leaves.
Arrowhead Park • We have been out and replacing deck boards and blowing the leaves off the trail as time
allows. Carter Woods Park
• We have ordered and received our trash/recycling cans for Carter Woods Park. • We have also started installing the new trash/recycling cans. They are surface mount so
we are in the process of pouring concrete pads to mount them to. Lions Park
• The Lions club was out and poured a pad to mount the lion to and mounted it. We went out and expanded the landscaped area around the lion and will do some additional planting around it in spring.
Patriot Park
• We have been continuing to patch the holes from the woodpecker damage. Over the winter months I will look at some alternatives to the wood siding that we currently have.
Prairie Hill Park
• We have done some landscaping down by the fishing dock and some other rough areas in the park.
• We stained the bike display board that was built a few years ago by an Eagle Scout. While they were there they also trimmed the bushes on the side of the sledding hill.
• We have also installed a dog waste station on the trail down by the pond. We have been finding bags with dog waste around the park grounds so we are hoping this helps with that problem.
Forestry
• We had 34 new street trees planted in various areas throughout the town. They are mostly replacing Ash Trees that we are currently removing. So far the crews have removed 25 of our street Ash trees. Last week we had the stump grinder in and had about 45 stumps ground throughout the town.
• When we removed an infested tree I took a piece of it and peeled the bark back. In the picture you can see the larvae which look like little white worms or a long maggot. They can live in the green wood for 1 to 2 years as long as the bark is attached. So far we have been able to chip most of the infested wood that has been cut down. The large logs that can’t be chipped will be stored at the town hall until we find a different site.
• We had 17 trees planted at Town Center Park with funds from an ATC grant. They were planted according to the landscape plan. We started at the entrance of the park and have a nice tree line started.
Trails
• We have also installed a set of gates on the new trail head on Elsner Rd. EAB Larvae picture
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
1900 GRAND CHUTE BLVD. GRAND CHUTE, WI 54913-9613 FAX 920-832-6036 STREET DIVISION UTILITY DIVISION PHONE 920-832-1581
S:\DPW\Park Commission\Reports\Park DPW Report\2017\November\November 2017 Directors Report.docx
DIRECTORS MEMORANDUM TO: Park Commissioners
Jim March, Town Administrator
Thomas Marquardt, Director of Public Works
FROM: Karen M. Heyrman, Deputy Director of Public Works
DATE: November 13, 2017
RE: Report from DPW for 11-13-17 Park Commission Meeting
Budget Summary 2017 Budget As of 10/31/17
% Used
PARK REVENUES
Park Rental, Recreation Soda Mach./Tickets Rev. Donations Grants Sale of Equipment
$ 17,500 $ 5,100 $ 25,000 $ 5,000 $ 800
$ 15,205.68 $ 1,754.00 $ 2.265.00 $ 0.00 $ 1,135.00
86.89% 34.39% 9.06% 0.00% 141.88
PARKS Personnel (Salary, OT, Commissioners, Fringe Ben.)
$218,040 $131,290.59 60.21%
Operations & Maint. $105,117 $ 68,102.78 64.79%
Capital Outlay – Equip. $153,100 $ 20,839.25 13.61%
RECREATION Personnel(Salary, OT, Fringes) $ 15,830 $ 11,863.91 74.95%
Operations & Maint. $ 9,550 $ 4.943.84 51.77%
TRAILS MAINT. Personnel $ 30,580 $ 20,309.49 66.41%
Operations & Maint. $ 83,650 $ 19,531.97 23.35%
FORESTRY. Personnel $ 14,000 $ 16,489.68 117.78%
Operations & Maint. $ 22,300 $ 4,892.19 21.94%
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Town Campus Park Planning Town Campus Regional Park Carter Woods Park/AWBC Master Plan Pickleball
$ 52,600 $1,071,000 $ 55,600 $ 50,000
$ 52,600.00 $761,364.40 $ 41,865.19 $ 24,845.75
100.00%
71.09%
75.30%
49.69%
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
1900 GRAND CHUTE BLVD. GRAND CHUTE, WI 54913-9613 FAX 920-832-6036 STREET DIVISION UTILITY DIVISION PHONE 920-832-1581
S:\DPW\Park Commission\Reports\Park DPW Report\2017\November\November 2017 Directors Report.docx
1. Maintenance Report
Mike Arft will present this report.
2. Prairie Hill Park
FVMTB work on the Single Track Trail continues.
Mike and I met with FVT to discuss burning the prairie in spring of 2018.
3. Update on the security cameras in parks
The IT Department has provided the following update on installation of security cameras in parks:
• Meetings have started with an additional fiber carrier for services to selected locations.
• Getting fiber to Water Tower 1 by Town Hall is on hold. Site survey at the parks showed that Water Tower 2 is a better solution due to less obstructions.
• Getting fiber to Water Tower 2 is in architectural design. Bids will be back on November 10th with construction to start immediately.
• Fiber to Lions Park is currently up and running on the new fiber. Systems Technologies is scheduled to start on Monday, November 13th .
• IT worked with Matt Kasriel to get a Ladder Fire Truck out to parks being considered for wireless communications. Pole heights have been determined at Prairie Hill, Patriot Park and Arrowhead Park.
• An engineering design with specifications is under development by one vendor to detail requirements to be added to a different vendors intersection pole.
• IT is working with our attorney for a legal agreement between Grand Chute and the intersection pole provider.
• The pole provider is working with We Energies on an electrical design at pole intersections.
4. Town Center park updates
Change Orders to Date:
• CO #1- $440, to change door 106 from a pair door to a single 3’6” single door.
• CO #2 - $539 to add the hold open arms to seven doors.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
1900 GRAND CHUTE BLVD. GRAND CHUTE, WI 54913-9613 FAX 920-832-6036 STREET DIVISION UTILITY DIVISION PHONE 920-832-1581
S:\DPW\Park Commission\Reports\Park DPW Report\2017\November\November 2017 Directors Report.docx
• CO #4 - $10,450 to add HDPE pond liners.
• CO #5 - $462 to change the size of door #109 from 3’0” to 3’8”.
• CO#6 - $944 to add a quazite box and PVC pipe for cameras.
- $555 to add a conduit to the island for electrical to the future sign.
The first layer of asphalt pavement will be completed the week of November13. The surface layer will be delayed until 2018 due to cold temperatures. Snow stops were not included in the alternate bid item. A change order for $3,595 was provided by the contractor. Staff will request quotes to complete the work outside of the contract and submit a request to the Town Board for approval at the November 21 meeting. Work on the planters began this week and we discovered drains shown on the plan were not installed. In discussion with the designer and supplier it is my understanding it is in the Towns best interest to construct per the specifications. I informed the contractor that their method of construction cannot be accepted and am hoping for prompt resolution. The architect informed us that the sunshades will require additional bracing to carry the loads. The contractor was given the details on what is needed and informs me the lead time is 8-12 weeks. The fire protection requires the design of the sprinkler system per NFPA and all state and local codes. We are not clear on how the system is monitored and have asked the contractor to clarify the design.
The contractor provided the schedule showing completion at the end of November, about two weeks past the contract completion date. With the exception of the fire protection monitoring, the outstanding items can be completed after the facility is open. In some cases, a can expect a better qualit
The fundraising team has concluded their meetings. The team developed monetary donation levels and naming opportunity contribution amounts. A brochure and postcard were developed to make the community aware of these opportunities to contribute. The team developed a concept of a painted tree on the wall in the community building to recognize donors. Staff is requesting quotes for painting and leaf name plates. Employee match will be recognized and additional contributions will supplement previous donations. The room rental agreement and rental rate structure developed by the team was approved at the November 7, 2017 Town Board meeting.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
1900 GRAND CHUTE BLVD. GRAND CHUTE, WI 54913-9613 FAX 920-832-6036 STREET DIVISION UTILITY DIVISION PHONE 920-832-1581
S:\DPW\Park Commission\Reports\Park DPW Report\2017\November\November 2017 Directors Report.docx
5. Carter Woods Park Base Line Fencing
The Town Board approved reallocating the 2017 budgeted capital expense for $13,700 to increase the 2018 budgeted capital expense for installation of base line fencing at Carter Woods Park. Both vendors would not honor their 2017 price in 2018 so new quotes will be solicited in 2018 to complete the ball diamond upgrades. The attached email was sent to Appleton West Baseball Club (AWBC) informing them that they would be charged the standard fees for the baseball diamond use in 2018 and to include the cost of extending electrical with the scoreboard and/or batting cage donations.
No response was received from the letter sent to baseball clubs in September requesting input on the addition of a baseball diamond at Carter Woods Park.
6. Park Commission monthly report to Town Board
The Town Board monthly report will include an update on the Town Center Park Community Building completion and the TAP Grant recommendation.
AGENDA REQUEST
November 13, 2017 TOPIC: Discuss the Transportation Alternative Program (TAP) Grant Funding application.
New Business Unfinished Business Reports
Closed Session Ordinance/Resolution
Meeting: Park Commission
Department Reporting: Community Development Submitted By: Mike Patza, Town Planner
ISSUE: The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) is a legislative program that was authorized in Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (or "FAST Act"), the federal transportation act that was signed into law on December 4, 2015. With certain exceptions, projects that met eligibility criteria for the Safe Routes to School Program, Transportation Enhancements, and/or the Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities Program are eligible TAP projects. All TAP projects require sponsors to pay 20% of approved projects costs.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Town applied for TAP grant funding in 2016 for a multi-use trail along the west side of CTH A from Grand Chute Boulevard to Bubolz Nature Center. We were notified in 2017 that the application was not selected by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. The Town is planning to apply for funding in 2018 for a similar project.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Park Commission provide a recommendation of support for the Grand Chute application for the 2018-2022 Transportation Alternatives Program Award Cycle.
FISCAL IMPACT: BUDGET
ATTACHMENTS: 2016 Grand Chute TAP Grant Application & Grant Scoring Criteria
10/30/2015
A-1
WisDOT 2016-2020 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Application
http://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/doing-bus/local-gov/astnce-pgms/aid/tap.aspx
Review and utilize TAP guidelines and application instructions when completing this document.
As discussed in the WisDOT TAP Guidelines, this application will go through a two step process. The first step will be an assessment by the region as to eligibility and whether or not the project will be able to meet the rigorous, statutorily mandated commencement deadline. The second step will be an assessment of the relative merits of the application compared to other eligible applications. Applicants that pass the technical review will receive notification from WisDOT.
Application Type
Select one and only one box for the application type. Please note that projects which are within the boundaries of a TMA will need to either compete locally within the MPO or as part of the Statewide solicitation. Refer to this map (http://wisconsindot.gov/Documents/doing-bus/local-gov/plning-orgs/map.pdf) for more information about the TMA areas. Appleton Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) – Green Bay MPO Madison Area MPO Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (Milwaukee and Round Lake Beach) If none of the above, project application is from: Area with population between 5,000 and 200,000 Area with population of 5,000 or less
Region-wide: % of population within a TMA area % of population between 5000 and 200,000, & % of population between 5000 and 200,000
Project Applicant
Name, Location of Public Sponsor and Sponsor Type: Sponsor Name: Town of Grand Chute Sponsor Type (Check appropriate box): Local government (check one): County City Village Town Regional transportation authority Transit agency State or federal natural resource/public land agency School district or school(s) Tribal Nation Project Title: CTH A Multi-Use Trail Extension Describe location, boundaries and length of the project: Extension of a 10 ft. wide asphalt multi-use trail on the west side of CTH A from Grand Chute Blvd. north 0.5 miles to the entrance of the Bubolz Nature Preserve. County: Outagamie County Street Address of Project (if located on a highway or road): 4000-4815 N. Lynndale Drive/CTH A
10/30/2015
A-2
Note: For infrastructure projects, attach a project location map on one sheet of paper, size 8½ by 11.
Project Contact
Primary Public Sponsor Agency Contact Information: Name: Mike Patza Title: Town Planner Street Address: 1900 W. Grand Chute Blvd. Phone: (920) 832-1599 Municipality: Town of Grand Chute State: WI Zip: 54913 Fax: (920) 832 - 1625 E-mail: Michael.Patza@GrandChute.net
Secondary Public Sponsor Agency or Private Organization Contact Information (if applicable): Organization / Agency Name: Town of Grand Chute Name: Tom Marquardt Title: Director of Public Works Street Address: 1900 W. Grand Chute Blvd. Phone: (920) 832-1581 Municipality: Town of Grand Chute State: WI Zip: 54913 Fax: (920) 832-6036 E-mail: Thomas.Marquardt@GrandChute.net
MPO, if applicable
Select one, if applicable, Bay Lake RPC (Sheboygan), Brown County Planning Commission (Green Bay) Chippewa-Eau Claire MPO (WCWRPC – Eau Claire) Dubuque Metropolitan Area Planning Study Duluth/Superior Metropolitan Interstate Committee (Superior) East Central Wisconsin RPC (Appleton, Oshkosh) Fond du Lac MPO (Fond du Lac) Janesville MPO (Janesville) La Crosse Area Planning Committee (La Crosse) Madison Area MPO (Madison) Marathon County MPO (Wausau) Southeastern Wisconsin RPC (SEWRPC - Waukesha) Stateline Area Transportation Study (Beloit)
Refer to this map (http://wisconsindot.gov/Documents/doing-bus/local-gov/plning-orgs/map.pdf) for more information about the TMA areas.
MPO Project Prioritization If an MPO is submitting more than one project in an urbanized area within an MPO, the sponsor must rank each project in priority order, e.g., 1 (highest priority) to 5 (lowest), for the local priority among five projects. Local
ranking will be used as a guide in project selection. Project Priority: Please Note: MPO Project Prioritization is due by April 22, 2016.
Project Activity TAP Eligibility Category:
10/30/2015
A-3
Indicate which ONE of below categories best identifies the proposed project:
Bicycle-Pedestrian Facilities: construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists and other non-motorized forms of transportation (this category includes on-road bicycle lanes, sidewalks, etc.)
Safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities
Conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non-
motorized transportation users
Construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas
Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities
Safe Routes to School (SRTS) (this category includes infrastructure and non-infrastructure activities) NOTE: Applicants proposing a project within the SRTS eligibility category MUST complete the ‘School Demographics’ and ‘Safe Routes to School Plan’ sections on page A-5 below.
Project Summary (400 words or less or). Please copy and paste your response from a Word Document. Applicants must fill out the project summary field below.
The 10 ft. asphalt multi-use trail will run along the west side of CTH A from W. Grand Chute Blvd. extending north 0.5 miles to the Bubolz Nature Preserve. Approximately 700 ft. of the trail will be boardwalk and a boardwalk bridge will be utilized to cross a navigable stream. This section of CTH A currently has no bicycle or pedestrians accommodations, very narrow or no shoulder, and high traffic speeds and volume. Urbanization of the west side of CTH A and stormwater facilities will be utilized to fit the trail into the existing right-of-way. A 10 ft. landscape buffer and lighting will be incorporated into the project to create a safe environment for all trail users. This facility will connect to and be an extension of the existing bicycle and pedestrian network in Grand Chute providing a crucial connection and access for residents. Additionally, this segment is part of the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Network which was identified by the East Central Regional Planning Commission in 2014. During the development of the Grand Chute Pedestrian and Bicycle Strategy, residents identified Bubolz Nature Preserve as one of the most desired destinations in Grand Chute to receive bicycle and pedestrian access. The new trail will provide active transportation options for the 60,000 annual visitors to the 725 acre preserve. Numerous educational activities and events take place throughout the year at Bubolz Nature Preserve which hosts over 5,500 K-12 students annually. The Preserve also features 8.5 miles of hiking trails which will be accessible from the new trail. The multi-use trail will also connect to another trail that will serve the new Forest View Estates subdivision. This connection will provide access to the new trail and to the larger bicycle and pedestrian network for 40 existing households and approximately 100 new households in the residential development. Future plans exist to connect bicyclists and pedestrians across CTH A to additional trail facilities as development occurs on the property east of the highway. Providing active transportation options to popular destinations continues to be a priority in Grand Chute. As implementation of the Grand Chute Pedestrian and Bicycle Strategy moves forward, continued progress is being made to eliminate gaps and remove barriers in the bicycle and pedestrian network. This project is a critical link in that network and will help create a safe an efficient transportation system for all users.
10/30/2015
A-4
Local Resolution of Support
There is or there will be a local resolution of support for the proposed project, executed by a governing body that has the authority to make financial commitment on behalf of the project sponsor (i.e., County Board, City Council, or Regional Planning Commission Policy Board).
Yes No Please note that a resolution will be required for an award, which means a copy of the resolution should be
submitted to the Region Local Program Manager no later than 5:00 PM April 15, 2016.
Existing Facilities & Projects
Rail Facilities: Does a railroad facility exist within 1,000 feet of the project limits? Yes No If yes, specify: SELECT If yes, does the project physically cross a rail facility? Yes No Will an easement from OCR be required? Yes No Is the proposed project location in an area with known safety issues? Yes No If yes, specify: and (consider applying for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds if applicable)
Is this project on or parallel to a local road or street? Yes No If Yes, provide the name of the road or street: N. Lynndale Drive/CTH A Does this project cross a state or federal highway? Yes No Does this project run parallel to a state or federal highway? Yes No If Yes to any of these questions attach an existing typical cross-section of the roadway, showing right of way, travel lanes, shoulder and sidewalk (if applicable). Examples are available in FDM15-1-5 attachment 5.3 of the WisDOT facilities Development Manual. Will this project be constructed as part of another planned road project? Yes No If Yes, specify if this is a state, county, or local project and when the road project is scheduled for construction: Will any exceptions to standards be requested? Yes No If Yes, provide a brief description of the exceptions that may be requested:
Real Estate (RE) /Right of Way (ROW)
Was any real estate acquired or transferred in anticipation of this project? Yes No If yes, please explain.
List any other funding (past or present) used within the proposed project limits (i.e. DNR Stewardship)
Is the project on an existing right of way (ROW)? Yes No (NOTE: It is recommended that local funds be used to acquire right of way) If Yes, have you obtained a permit from the WisDOT Regional Office Maintenance Section to conduct work on the right of way? (NA, right of way is Outagamie County jurisdiction) Yes No Check all boxes that apply to ROW acquisition for this project:
None Less than ½ acre More than ½ acre Parklands Large parcels Temporary interests
10/30/2015
A-5
List any other funding (past or present) used within the proposed project limits (i.e. DNR Stewardship)
NA If right of way was acquired in anticipation of this project, attach a detailed list of available, completed project and parcel acquisition documentation. Refer to Section 11.2, Records Management, found in the LPA MANUAL for RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION http://wisconsindot.gov/dtsdManuals/re/lpa-manual/lpa-manual-ch11.pdf. If right of way was acquired in anticipation of this project, did the acquisition contain any buildings or relocation?
Yes No If yes, Please read Section 6.2, Relocation Assistance, found in the LPA MANUAL for RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION to determine if relocation assistance was properly offered and documented http://wisconsindot.gov/dtsdManuals/re/lpa-manual/lpa-manual-ch6.pdf If right of way is required, acquisition will occur through a transfer of an adequate interest in real property. Yes No FHWA has determined that an adequate real property interest excludes licensing agreements (LA), which agreements will not be considered. For real estate questions, please contact Kerry Paruleski, WisDOT Local Public Agency Real Estate Statewide Facilitator, at (414) 220-5461 or kerry.paruleski@dot.wi.gov.
Environmental/Cultural Issues
Agriculture Yes No Not Investigated Comments: Archaeological sites Yes No Not Investigated Comments: Historical sites Yes No Not Investigated Comments: Designated Main Street area Yes No Not Investigated Comments: Lakes, waterways, floodplains Yes No Not Investigated Comments: The new trail will cross a navigable stream and boardwalk bridge will be installed over the stream. Required permits will be obtained from the Wisconsin DNR. Wetland Yes No Not Investigated Comments: Wetland indicators are present in the project area. A wetland delineation will be conducted as a part of this project to identify any wetland areas and ensure they are not impacted and/or any impacts are properly mitigated through the appropriate regulatory process. Stormwater management Yes No Not Investigated Comments: Stormwater management will be addressed through the design process to ensure proper drainage of the trail facility and will meet all of the Town of Grand Chute codes and ordinances. Hazardous materials sites Yes No Not Investigated Comments: Hazardous materials on existing structure Yes No Not Investigated Comments: Upland habitat Yes No Not Investigated Comments: Endangered/threatened/migratory species Yes No Not Investigated Comments: Section 4(f) Yes No Not Investigated Comments:
10/30/2015
A-6
Section 6(f) Yes No Not Investigated Comments: Through/adjacent to tribal land Yes No Not Investigated Comments:
Miscellaneous Issues Construction Schedule Restrictions (trout, migratory bird, local events): NA Local Force Account (LFA): Will the proposed project utilize municipal employees to complete any portion of the construction activities? Yes No If yes, explain the desired LFA portion of the project. NOTE: LFA work must include labor, equipment and materials. The purchase of materials only is not
considered to be a legitimate project. NOTE: Please review WisDOT TAP Guidelines for restrictions on certain LFA work as of July 1, 2015.
Maintenance (only complete this section if project application involves a trail project):
Will the facility be snowplowed in the winter? Yes No Comment: The Town of Grand Chute already performs winter maintenance on majority of the trail
system in the community. In 2015 the Town Board passed a resolution to provide winter maintenance on additional trails surrounding the Fox River Mall. This new facility will also be maintained by the Town of Grand Chute in the winter.
If no to the above question, will the trail allow snowmobile use in the winter? Yes No Comment: Anticipated fee for trail use: Yes No Comment: Anticipated equestrian use on trail: Yes No Comment:
Other Funding Sources: Has the municipality anticipated, requested or been approved for other federal or state funding from WisDOT for the improvement? Yes No If yes, please indicate all of the other funding sources that are anticipated, have been requested or approved with the associated project ID(s): Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Anticipated Requested Approved ID: Local Roads Improvement Program (LRIP) Anticipated Requested Approved ID: Railroad Programs Anticipated Requested Approved ID: Surface Transportation Program – Rural Anticipated Requested Approved ID: Surface Transportation Program - Urban Anticipated Requested Approved ID: CMAQ Anticipated Requested Approved ID: Transportation Enhancements Program Approved ID: Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities Program Approved ID: Safe Routes to School Approved ID: Transportation Economic Assistance Program Anticipated Requested Approved ID: Flood Damage Aids Anticipated Requested Approved ID: State Funding (Describe): Anticipated Requested Approved ID: Other: Anticipated Requested Approved ID:
10/30/2015
A-7
Is project identified in a long-range transportation plan? Yes No If Y, link to plan: http://fcompo.org/planning-activities/long-range-transportation-planning/ Is project identified in a bicycle-pedestrian plan? Yes No If Y, link to plan: http://www.grandchute.net/departments/community-development/general/page_38038ef0dbbf/ Is project identified in an outdoor recreation plan? Yes No If Y, link to plan: https://sites.google.com/site/grandchutecors/ Is project identified in a comprehensive plan? Yes No If Y, link to plan: http://www.grandchute.net/departments/community-development/general/page_94f2ee94bf52/ Is project identified in any other planning document? Yes No If Y, link to plan: http://www.ecwrpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Appleton-TMA-and-Oshkosh-MPO-BikePed-Plan-2014.pdf Other Concept Notes: Provide any additional relevant project information that has not been covered in another section of the application.
School Demographics (Complete ONLY if submitting a project within the SRTS eligibility category)
What are the name(s) and demographics for each school affected by the proposed program or project?
Optional: Alternatively, SRTS project applicants may submit a narrative response/attachment 1 detailing
school demographics provided that all fields below are answered in such attachment.
School name: School population: Grades of students at school:
Estimated number of students currently walking to school (if known):
Estimated number of students currently biking to school (if known):
Does the school have any policies related to walking or biking?
Distance eligibility for riding a bus: Number of children not eligible for busing:
Number of students eligible for busing because of a hazard situation:
Percentage of students living within one mile of the school:
Percentage of students living within two miles of the school:
Percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-cost school meals:
Community(s) served by school: Community(s) population:
Please provide other pertinent demographic information about the community or school:
Safe Routes to School Plan (Complete ONLY if submitting a project within the SRTS eligibility category)
Does your school or community have a Safe Routes to School plan? Yes No
If yes, can it be viewed online? Yes, the website address is No, it is attached with the application.
If no, please describe, in no more than 400 words, any SRTS-related planning efforts undertaken by the school or
community.
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
10/30/2015
A-8
Project Costs, Priorities, and State Fiscal Years:
NOTE: do not include pages A-7 and A-8 in the Concept Definition Report (CDR) for approved TAP projects.
Complete the table below for the appropriate fiscal years of the application/project cycle (2016-2020). If a sponsor proposes to construct a project in phases throughout multiple years, schedule the project costs as appropriate and provide further details in the project description. In addition to the table below, attach a detailed breakdown of project costs in Microsoft Excel. This detailed breakdown must clarify assumptions made in creating the budget such that a third party reviewer would be able to substantiate the assumptions. Submit a separate application and budget for each project or stand-alone project segment for which you are willing to accept funding, or for a bike trail section that could function as a separate facility. Project requests are not considered for partial funding.
Applicants should reference the WisDOT 2015 Cost Estimate Table prior to completing this section of the application: http://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/doing-bus/local-gov/astnce-pgms/highway/tools.aspx. NOTE: Requesting design and construction projects in the same fiscal year is not allowed.
Tied Projects? Please indicate which projects will be tied (if applicable): Project Prioritization If a sponsor is submitting more than one project the sponsor must rank each project in priority order, e.g., 1 (highest priority) to 5 (lowest), for the local priority among five projects. Local ranking will be used as a guide in project selection. Project Priority:
Construction: Basis for Construction Estimate: Itemized Per Square Foot Past Projects
WisDOT 2014 Cost Estimate Table (see hyperlink above) Other, please specify: FY 2019 FY 2020
Federal Share of the Participating Construction Cost (80%) $420,822
Local Share of the Participating Construction Cost (20%) $105,205 Non-Participating Construction Cost (100% Local) $0 A. Subtotal Construction Costs $526,027
B. State Review for Construction Percentage: 12% $90,000 (see instructions, page I-7, Table 1) *(State Review increased due to project complexity)
Construction with State Review Cost Estimate (sum lines A and B) $616,027
Design: 100% Locally Funded (state review is required to be included as 100% locally funded) OR 80% Federally Funded (“state review only” projects are not allowed)
FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020
10/30/2015
A-9
A. Plan Development (see instructions page I-9, Table 1) Percentage: % $ B. State Review for Design (see instructions, page I-9, Table 1) Percentage: % $ Design with State Review Cost Estimate (sum lines A and B) $
Real Estate: (Recommend funding with local funds.) FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Total Real Estate Cost (round to next $1,000) $
Utility: (Compensable utility costs must be $50,000 minimum per utility. Recommend funding with local funds.
FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Total Utility Cost (round to next $1,000) $
Other: (Planning, Administration, or other non-infrastructure SRTS projects):
FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Total Other Cost (round to next $1,000) $
NOTE: WisDOT Policy link: http://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/doing-bus/eng-consultants/cnslt-rsrces/rdwy/default.aspx. NOTE: WisDOT Region staff may revise estimates in the Plan Development, State Review for Design, and State Review for Construction categories based on the complexity of the project or other factors.
Narrative Response
Provide a narrative response attachment answering questions 1 through 3, making sure to provide information in response to each sub-question. Please limit the response to three pages, using a minimum 11-point font size. 1. For Safe Routes to School Project Applications: - Why is the project/activity needed? What are the current conditions for bicycling and walking? What problems or issues need resolution to get more students walking and biking? How will the proposed project addressed these problems? - How many students will benefit from the proposed project? - Describe nay existing or planned activities or projects at the affected school(s) that enhance biking or walking to school. - Describe how you plan to ensure the long-term success of Safe Routes to School. 2. For Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects: - Clearly indicate the location, length, width, surface materials, and any connections to existing or planned facilities. - How many new or replacement trips are expected and from which modes i.e. biking or walking? - How much of the new or replacement use is for work or other utilitarian trips? - How many auto trips will be eliminated? - What is the average trip distance of auto trips that will be eliminated? 3. For all projects, to the extent not already addressed in answers to the questions above, describe project
benefits by answering the following questions:
10/30/2015
A-10
Timeline -How will the project sponsor ensure that the project is implemented on time? What, if any, obstacles are there to ensuring that the 20% cost share be available at the time of project
authorization. -What obstacles or problems must be overcome to implement this project? -In light of project obstacles, describe how the project sponsor will comply with state law and policy
requiring project commencement within four years of the award date, and project completion within approximately six years.
Connectivity -How, if at all, does the proposed project add connectivity to the state’s multi-modal transportation
network, including bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities? - Describe whether the proposed project is within ½ mile of any of the listed utilizes; and describe how, if
at all, the proposed project would connect to these existing land uses: public park, school, library, public transit, employment and/or retail centers, residential areas, other.
Safety - Describe how the proposed project makes transportation facilities safer and less intimidating for non-
motorists. - If the proposed project location has undergone a walk or bike audit, provide any pertinent information
regarding safety concerns revealed in that audit. Miscellaneous - What will make this project a success, especially as compared to other proposed projects of the same or
similar type?
Key Program Requirements Confirmation Please confirm your understanding of the following project condition by typing your name, title and initials at the bottom of this section. A Head of Government/Designee with fiscal authority for the project sponsor must initial this section and sign this application. Sponsor consultant(s) should not initial or sign project applications. WisDOT will deem ineligible any application that does not include a complete response to this section. a. Private organizations proposing projects must have a public project sponsor such as a local government unit. b. The project sponsor or private partner must provide matching dollar funding of at least 20% of project costs. c. This is a reimbursement program. The project sponsor must finance the project until federal reimbursement
funds are available. d. The project sponsor will pay to the state all costs incurred by the state in connection with the improvement that
exceed federal financing commitments or other costs that ineligible for federal reimbursement. In order to guarantee the project sponsor’s foregoing agreements to pay the state, the project sponsor, through its duly executed officers or officials, agrees and authorized the state to set off and withhold the required reimbursement amount as determined by the state from any monies otherwise due and payable by the state to the municipality.
e. The project sponsor must not incur costs for any phase of the project until that phase has been authorized for
federal charges and the WisDOT Region has notified the sponsor that it can begin incurring costs. Otherwise, the sponsor risks incurring costs that will not be eligible for federal funding.
f. The project sponsor will follow the applicable federal and state regulations required for each phase of the
project. Some of these are described in the Guidelines. The requirements include, but are not limited to, the
10/30/2015
A-11
following: a Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) process for design and engineering services (Brooks Act); real estate acquisition requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and amendments; competitive procurement of construction services; Davis-Bacon wage rates on federal highway right-of-way projects; WisDOT FDM & Bicycle Facilities Handbook; ADA regarding accessibility for the disabled; MUTCD regarding signage; U.S. Department of the Interior standards for historic buildings. Each WisDOT Region can provide copies of the current Sponsor’s Guide to Non-Traditional Transportation Project Implementation, and references for sections of the Facilities Development Manual (FDM) and other documents necessary to comply with federal and state regulations. Applicants who plan to implement their projects as Local Let Contracts using the Sponsor’s Guide must become certified that they are capable of undertaking these projects.
g. If applying for a bicycle facility, it is understood that All Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) are not allowed. Snowmobile
use is only allowable by local ordinance. Trail fees may only be charged on a facility if the fees are used solely to maintain the trail. WisDOT reserves the right to require that facilities be snowplowed as part of a maintenance agreement where year round use by bicyclists and pedestrians is expected.
h. The project sponsor agrees to maintain the project for its useful life. Failure to maintain the facility, or sale of
the assets improved with FHWA funds prior to the end of its useful life, will subject the sponsor to partial repayment of federal funds or additional stipulations protecting the public interest in the project for its useful life.
i. If the project sponsor should withdraw the project, it will reimburse the state for any costs incurred by the state
on behalf of the project. j. The project sponsor agrees to state delivery and oversight costs by WisDOT staff and their agents. These costs
include review of Design and Construction documents for compliance with federal and state requirements, appropriate design standards, and other related review. These costs will vary with the size and complexity of the project. The sponsor agrees to add these costs to the project under the same match requirements 80% / 20% match requirements.
k. Projects that are fully or partially federally funded must be designed in accordance with all applicable federal
design standards, even if design of the project was 100% locally funded. l. As the project progresses, the state will bill the project sponsor for work completed that is ineligible for federal
reimbursement. Upon project completion, a final audit will determine the final division of costs as between the state and the project sponsor. If reviews or audits reveal any project costs that are ineligible for federal funding, the project sponsor will be responsible for any withdrawn costs associated with the ineligible work.
m. ***For 100% locally-funded design projects, cots for design plan development and state review for design are
100% the responsibility of the local project sponsor. Project sponsors may not seek federal funding only for state review of design projects.
n. The project sponsor acknowledges that the requisite project commencement requirement and that failure to
comply with the applicable commencement deadline will jeopardize federal funding. Commencement is within four years of the date of the project award. The project must be commenced within four (4) years of the project award date according to Sec. 85.021, Wis. Stats. For construction projects, a project is commenced when construction is begun. For planning projects, a planning project is commenced when the planning study is begun. For non-infrastructure projects that do not fall within any of the above categories, a project is considered commenced on the date that WisDOT receives the first reimbursement request from the project sponsor, as noted on form DT1713 in the ‘Date Received’ field.
o. The project sponsor acknowledges that the requisite project completion timeline for approved TAP projects will
be memorialized in a state-municipal agreement, and failure to comply with the applicable project timeline will jeopardize federal funding.
10/30/2015
A-12
p. Federally-funded transportation construction projects, with the exception of sidewalks, are likely improvements that benefit the public at large. Improvements of this type cannot generally be the basis of levying a special assessment pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 66.0703. Municipalities who wish to obtain project funding via special assessment levied against particular parcels should seek advice of legal counsel. See Hildebrand v. Menasha, 2011 WI App. 83.
Please confirm your understanding of the following project condition by typing your name, title and initials at the bottom of this section. A Head of Government/Designee with fiscal authority for the project sponsor must initial this section and sign this application. Sponsor consultant(s) should not initial or sign project applications. I confirm that I have read and understand project conditions (a) through (o) above: Name: James V. March Title: Town Administrator Accepted (please initial here): J.V.M.
Fiscal Authorization and Signature
Application prepared by a consultant? Yes No If yes, consultant information and signature required below.
Consultant Company Name: Company Location (City, State):
Consultant Signature (electronic only): Date:
NOTE: On Local Program projects, it is not permissible for a consultant to fill out applications gratis (or for a small fee) for a municipality and then be selected to do the design work on a project. A municipality could start their QBS consultant selection process early enough and make the application part of the scope of services with the understanding that all costs incurred prior to authorization will be the responsibility of the local municipality. See FDM 8-5 for additional information.
Sponsor Agency: Town of Grand Chute
Contact Person: James V. March (Note: must be Head of Government or Designee)
Title: Town Administrator
Address: 1900 W. Grand Chute Blvd. Grand Chute, WI 54913
Telephone: 920-832-4773
Email: Jim.March@GrandChute.net
Only one project sponsor is allowed per project. As a representative of the project sponsor, the individual that signs below confirms that the information in this project application is accurate. A local official, not a consultant, must sign the application. I understand that completion of this application does not guarantee project approval for federal funding.
Head of Government/Designee Signature (electronic only): J.V.M. Date: 1/28/2016
Application and Attachments Submit applications and attachments utilizing the contact information contained in the corresponding TAP Pre-Scoping Application Instructions. Applicants must submit eligible applications on or before 5PM on January 29, 2016, and must include the following documents:
A completed application in Microsoft Word format Narrative Response/Attachment 3: maximum of one double-spaced page, minimum 11-point font size
10/30/2015
A-13
Cost Estimate Detail as required in the ‘Project Costs and Dates’ section of this application. For infrastructure projects, a project map printed in black & white, on one sheet of 8½ by 11 paper If available, a local resolution of support for the proposed project. If right of way was acquired in anticipation of this project, attach a detailed list of available,
completed project and parcel acquisition documentation OPTIONAL Attachment If proposed project crosses or runs parallel to a local road, street, or state or federal highway, attach
an existing typical cross-section of the roadway, showing right of way, travel lanes, shoulder and sidewalk (if applicable).
SRTS School Demographics Information NOTE: Do not include additional attachments (photos, letters of support, etc.)
WisDOT Information – Shaded area to be completed by WisDOT staff only.
FOR WISDOT USE ONLY – enter the following information at application review
WisDOT Region comments on application, including eligibility concerns:
Region Reviewer’s Name:
Reviewer’s Title:
Date Received:
N. Lynndale Drive/CTH A Multi-Use Trail Extension
Grand ChuteTown Hall
Future TownCenter Park
Planning/Designin 2016
BubolzNature
Preserve
W Grand Chute Blvd
Bull Rush Drive
Barley Way
Honeysuckle Ln
N L
ynnd
ale
Dri
ve/ C
TH A
Whi
te H
awk
Dri
ve
White HawkMeadows North
Residential Development
Proposed Multi-Use Trail Extension
Existing Multi-Use Trail
Existing Sidewalk
Bike/Ped Connections for Forest View Estates
Future ResidentialDevelopment
Forest View EstatesResidential Development
Future Multi-Use Trail
Sophia Lane
Noelle Lane
Wre
n D
rive
Approximately 0.5 miles
Signalized Intersection
Kohl Drive
Grand ChuteFire Station # 1
0 500 1000
Feet N
Town of Grand ChuteCTH A Multi-Use Trail Extension
Attachment 1 Project Locaion Map
Girl Scouts ofthe Northwestern
Great Lakes
Town of Grand ChuteCTH A Multi-Use Trail Extension
Removing Curb & Gutter 80 LF $10.00 $800.00Excavation Common 800 CY $20.00 $16,000.00Base Aggregate Dense 1 1/4-Inch 1300 TON $15.00 $19,500.00HMA Pavement 3 LF 58-28 S 350 TON $75.00 $26,250.00Concrete Curb & Gutter 4-Inch Sloped 30-Inch Type J 2300 LF $15.00 $34,500.00Curb Ramp Detectable Warning Field Yellow 80 SF $40.00 $3,200.00Storm Sewer Pipe Class III-A 12-Inch 70 LF $30.00 $2,100.00Storm Sewer Pipe Class III-A 24-Inch 2400 LF $50.00 $120,000.00Manhole Covers Type J 7 EACH $450.00 $3,150.00Inlet Covers Type HM-GJ 7 EACH $700.00 $4,900.00Catch Basins 2x3-FT 7 EACH $1,200.00 $8,400.00Manholes 4-FT Diameter 7 EACH $1,700.00 $11,900.00Topsoil 8400 SY $2.50 $21,000.00Mulching 5850 SY $0.15 $877.50Silt Fence 2400 LF $2.00 $4,800.00Silt Fence Maintenance 2400 LF $0.10 $240.00Mobilizations Erosion Control 1 EACH $150.00 $150.00Erosion Mat Urban Class I Type B 2350 SY $1.50 $3,525.00Inlet Protection Type C 7 EACH $50.00 $350.00Temporary Ditch Checks 100 LF $8.00 $800.00Fertilizer Type A 5.25 CWT $50.00 $262.50Seeding Mixture No. 30 150 LB $6.00 $900.00Posts Tubular Steel 2x2-Inch x 10-FT 4 EACH $200.00 $800.00Signs 9 SF $20.00 $180.00Traffic Control (Project) 1 EACH $5,000.00 $5,000.00Traffic Control Drums 1965 DAY $0.35 $687.75Traffic Control Signs 200 DAY $0.80 $160.00Pavement Marking Crosswalk Epoxy 6-Inch 162 LF $7.00 $1,134.00Electrical Wire Traffic Signals 10 AWG 200 LF $0.75 $150.00Pedestrian Signal Face 12-Inch 2 EACH $290.00 $580.00Pedestrian Push Buttons 2 EACH $240.00 $480.00Lighting Units Walkway 11 EACH $750.00 $8,250.00Boardwalk Trail 700 LF $250.00 $175,000.00Boardwalk Bridge 1 EACH $50,000.00 $50,000.00
$526,027.00$90,000.00
$616,027.00DOT Construction Review :Construction Cost:
Total Construction Project Cost:
Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price AmountDescription
Attachment 2 Cost Estimate Detail
Narrative Response - Page 1 of 3
Town of Grand Chute CTH A Multi-Use Trail Extension
Attachment 3 Narrative Response Project Description This project involves the construction of a 10 ft. wide asphalt trail with a short section, approximately 700 feet, of boardwalk along the west side of CTH A from W. Grand Chute Blvd. extending north 0.5 miles to the Bubolz Nature Preserve. A 10 ft. wide grass terrace will serve as a buffer between trail users and vehicular traffic. A boardwalk bridge will be utilized to cross a navigable stream that runs underneath CTH A. Urbanization of the west side of CTH A and stormwater facilities will be incorporated into the project to fit the new trail within the existing right-of-way. To create a safe environment for all trail users, the project will include trail lighting and crosswalks over W. Honeysuckle Ln. and W. Grand Chute Blvd. A user activated pedestrian signal will also be included in the project at the signalized intersection of CTH A and W. Grand Chute Blvd. Safety This segment of CTH A currently has no bicycle or pedestrians accommodations. The posted speed limit on CTH A is 35 mph at W. Grand Chute Blvd. and just to the north increases to 45 mph. There is very little to no shoulder throughout this section of CTH A and multiple acceleration, deceleration, and bypass lanes create a very inconsistent road edge. Traffic volumes are about 7400 vehicles per day and there is no street lighting except at the intersection of CTH A and W. Grand Chute Blvd. All of these existing conditions create an extremely dangerous and uninviting environment for bicyclists or pedestrians. A new trail facility will create a safe place for bicyclists and pedestrians to travel, separated from vehicular traffic. CTH A is classified as an access controlled roadway by Outagamie County. With this designation, no new access points will be added which could adversely affect the new trail. Currently there are only three residential driveways, and one street intersection, W. Honeysuckle Lane, that would cross the new trail facility. The limited number of access points and potential conflicts with vehicular traffic adds to the safety benefits for bicyclists and pedestrians that will be realized by implementing this new facility. Connectivity The new trail will be an extension of the bicycle and pedestrian network that Grand Chute has worked to enhance over the past several years. Facilities implemented by Grand Chute that will directly connect to the new trail are listed below:
2015 White Hawk Drive & Kohl Drive sidewalk: concrete 0.75 miles
2015 Wren Drive multi-use trail: asphalt 0.2 miles
2012 Trail from Town Hall to White Hawk Meadows multi-use trail: asphalt 0.32 miles
2012 CTH A: CTH OO to W. Wisconsin Avenue multi-use trail: asphalt 0.95 miles
2010 Grand Chute Blvd west of CTH A multi-use trail: asphalt 0.6 miles
2008 Grand Chute Blvd east of CTH A to Town Hall multi-use trail: asphalt 0.38 miles
2006 CTH A: Grand Chute Blvd. to Capitol Drive multi-use trail: asphalt 0.6 miles
2005 CTH A: Capitol Drive to First Avenue sidewalk: concrete 0.4 miles
As indicated above, a multi-use trail was implemented in 2012 on CTH A between CTH OO and W. Wisconsin Avenue. This project was a part of an Outagamie County road reconstruction project and Grand Chute contributed the funds for the trail facility. With this facility in place, the signalized intersection of CTH A and CTH OO remained a significant barrier to bicyclists and pedestrians with multiple lanes of high speed traffic and no bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. Outagamie County redesigned portions of that intersection in 2015 to resolve traffic related concerns. Grand Chute again worked with the county and contributed funds to incorporate a bicycle and pedestrian crossing into the project that included marked crosswalks, refuge islands, and user activated pedestrian signals. In 2016 Grand Chute will fill in the last segment, approximately 300 ft. between CTH OO and First Ave, to eliminate the remaining gap and complete the corridor. The new trail will connect to and extend this bicycle and pedestrian corridor north to the Bubolz Nature Preserve.
Narrative Response - Page 2 of 3
In 2012 Grand Chute participated in the CTH JJ Corridor Study, which addressed a growing concern over pedestrian safety and quality of life along CTH JJ from CTH A to STH 55. One of the short term recommendations from the study was to widen the shoulders along CTH JJ to create more space for people walking or bicycling. Grand Chute, along with other municipalities, contributed funds to widen the shoulder on CTH JJ, which was completed in 2013. Long-term recommendations include a multi-use trail which would run the entire length of this corridor. The new multi-use trail on CTH A would eventually connect to these facilities on CTH JJ through future trail facilities on the east side of CTH A. During the development of the Grand Chute Pedestrian and Bicycle Strategy, residents identified Bubolz Nature Preserve as one of the most desired destinations in Grand Chute to receive bicycle and pedestrian access. The new trail will provide active transportation options for the 60,000 annual visitors to the 725 acre preserve. Numerous educational activities and events take place throughout the year at Bubolz Nature Preserve which hosts over 5,500 students in grades K-12 annually. The Preserve also features 8.5 miles of hiking trails which will be accessible from the new trail. The Girl Scouts of the Northwestern Great Lakes Appleton Service Center and Shop facility is located directly to the south of Bubolz Nature Preserve and the two facilities share a driveway. This facility serves as the headquarters for the Girl Scouts of the Northwestern Great Lakes council, which partners with 6,000 volunteers, serves approximately 18,000 girls, and covers 58 counties across northern Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. The Appleton facility is open to Girl Scout troops, local non-profits and area businesses to rent for meeting space. Girl Scout groups also use this building for troop meetings and large scale events. The new trail facility on CTH A would provide bicycle and pedestrian access to over 10,000 users that utilize the property annually. This trail will connect to another bicycle and pedestrian facility serving the new Forest View Estates subdivision. This connection will provide access to the new trail and to the larger bicycle and pedestrian network for 40 existing households and approximately 100 new households in the new residential development. In 2016, Grand Chute will begin planning the development of a large community park on the property it owns just to the north of the Town Hall. The new trail will provide a connection to the new park for the families living in Forest View Estates and the residential neighborhood to the north. Future plans to connect bicyclists and pedestrians across CTH A to additional trail facilities will be implemented as development occurs on the property east of the highway. In 2014, the East Central Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission went through the process of developing the Appleton (Fox Cities) Transportation Management Area (TMA) and Oshkosh Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The plan was focused on eliminated gaps in the bicycle and pedestrian networks between the numerous municipalities that make up these areas. Part of this process involved identifying corridors that were important to bicyclists and pedestrians on a regional level. Through the planning process, the Regional Network was identified, which consisted of both existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities and corridors that lacked these facilities. This segment of CTH A was identified as part of that Regional Network. Extending the multi-use trail along this corridor will not only serve the residents of Grand Chute but will also help to complete a piece of the larger Regional Network, which will provide more regional active transportation choices. The CTH A corridor also provides bicycle and pedestrian access to the Valley Transit system. A transit stop on Route 12 is located on the corner of CTH A and First Avenue, which provides access to the entire Fox Cities transit system for those walking or bicycling. Extending this corridor to the north will create more opportunities for people to access the transit system and utilize active transportation options. Support and Collaboration Staff met with representatives from the Outagamie Highway Department to discuss the trail project since it would occur within the right-of-way of a county highway. The Highway Department fully supports the project and a resolution to formally authorize the project will be submitted to the County in February 2016. Options were also discussed for future development of the trail system on the east side of CTH A. The county was very open to the idea of creating a bicycle and pedestrian crossing across CTH A at Bubolz Nature Preserve, which would include a refuge island and either Rapid Flashing Beacons or a Pedestrian Hybrid Signal. Long term plans for CTH A include the option of implementing two travel lanes with a center turn lane for this segment, which would be better suited for a refuge island and create a safer bicycle and pedestrian crossing. Staff also met with representatives from the Bubolz Nature Preserve regarding the trail project. Bubolz expressed its support for such a facility and shared a strong desire from the staff and visitors of the Preserve to have bicycle and pedestrian access to the property. The lack of any bicycle or pedestrian facilities leading to Bubolz, along with the
Narrative Response - Page 3 of 3
speed and volume of traffic, makes the property virtually inaccessible for most people that would like to walk or bicycle. There is currently a small amount of bicycle parking located on the property but the need for additional bicycle parking was discussed. Additionally, creating a safe access for pedestrians from the new trail along the driveway leading to the property was also discussed. Bubolz was confident in the ability to add bicycle parking if needed, and provide a trail or sidewalk that would connect to the new multi-use trail on CTH A and provide safe access to the property for trail users. Use With ongoing residential development in the neighborhoods surrounding this project, and the existing conditions on CTH A, it is very difficult to accurately project the volume of bicyclists and pedestrians that will use this new facility. Using bicycle and pedestrian count data collected by the East Central Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission in 2015, similar trails in the Town of Menasha, Town of Neenah, and Town of Grand Chute were evaluated. Counts from these trails indicate that an anticipated volume of bicyclists and pedestrians on the new CTH A multi-use trail of approximately 70 users per day can be expected. The proximity to popular destinations and connections to other facilities are key indicators that use will be high. With the unsafe and uninviting existing conditions on this portion of CTH A, it is evident that current bicycle and pedestrian use of this section is very low. Creating a separate space, physically separated from vehicular traffic, will encourage bicyclists and pedestrians of all ages and experience levels to use this facility for utilitarian and recreational trips. Timeline The multi-use trail extension on CTH A has been identified as a high priority project for the community because of the poor existing conditions on CTH A and the increased connectivity and improved access that will be gained from this facility. Grand Chute is committed to moving forward with the project and will provide 100 percent of the funding for the design process. Staff will work with the Town Engineer, McMahon Associates Inc., to complete the design process for the trail. The Town Engineer has become familiar with the characteristics of the project through the development of the construction budget, which will help to expedite the design process. Initial stages of design work will begin in 2016. The project timeline will be diligently monitored by Town staff, who will work closely with the Wisconsin DOT to ensure the commencement deadline is met. One obstacle to overcome with project implementation is the potential for wetlands to be present within the project area. Data from the Wisconsin DNR Surface Data Water Viewer shows wetlands indicators are present in the project area. A wetland delineation will be done as soon as practical to identify any wetland areas. Staff has extensive experience working with the Wisconsin DNR on wetland issues at development projects. Proper techniques and best practices will be implemented to avoid any adverse effects to wetlands and/or ensure any wetlands impacted are mitigated through the appropriate Wisconsin DNR procedures. Although the presence of wetlands will require extra attention and planning, staff is confident any potential issues can be resolved in a timely manner so that the commencement deadline will not be impacted. Since the project will take place completely within an existing right-of-way, the challenges and time associated with property acquisition will be avoided. There are no obstacles to ensure funds are available from the Town to cover the required 20 percent cost share for the grant at the time of project authorization. On Tuesday, January 19th, 2016, the Grand Chute Town Board passed resolution TBR-01-2016 which committed the Town to secure funding to cover the 20 percent cost share for construction and securing the local funding for the design and engineering costs of the project. Ensuring Success Staff will work collaboratively to ensure the CTH A multi-use trail project is delivered effectively and meets the commencement deadline. Over the past several years, Grand Chute has obligated substantial funding and resources to implement bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Grand Chute currently maintains the majority of its trail system year-round, which includes winter snow removal. This maintenance policy would be expanded to include the proposed multi-use trail on CTH A to ensure access to this new facility year-round. Efforts to enhance the bicycle and pedestrian network have been supported by staff, elected officials, developers, and residents. All of these groups realize that a comprehensive network of facilities is important to the community and to making Grand Chute a great place to live, work, and play. As implementation of the Grand Chute Pedestrian and Bicycle Strategy moves forward, continued progress is being made to eliminate gaps and remove barriers in the bicycle and pedestrian network. The CTH A multi-use trail project is a critical link in that network and will help create a safe and efficient transportation system for all users.
Typical Cross Section of CTH A with Multi-Use Trail
Town of Grand ChuteCTH A Multi-Use Trail Extension
Attachment 4 Typical Cross Sectiion of CTH A
10’ AshpaltMulti-Use
Trail
12’ Travel Lane12’ Travel Lane 8’ GravelShoulder
33’ Open Ditch15’ Open Ditch 10’ GrassTerrace
2’ Paved Shoulder5’ Paved Shoulder,2’ Gutter Pan, 1’ Curb
Typical Cross Section of CTH A with Multi-Use Trail
Typical Cross Section of CTH A
12’ Travel Lane12’ Travel Lane 8’ GravelShoulder
33’ Open Ditch33’ Open Ditch
2’ Paved Shoulder
8’ GravelShoulder
2’ Paved Shoulder
Town of Grand ChuteCTH A Multi-Use Trail Extension
Attachment 5 Town Board Resolution
Appleton Transportation Management Area –
Policies and Ranking Criteria for Transportation Alternatives Program Projects
The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) established the Transportation
Alternatives Program (TAP) to “provide{s} for a variety of alternative transportation projects,
including many there were previously eligible activities under separately funded programs.”
Transportation Alternatives Program incorporates the following three Wisconsin Department of
Transportation multi-modal transportation improvement programs:
Transportation Enhancements (TE)
Safe Routes to School (SRTS); and
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program.
WisDOT previously administered these programs as three distinct federal funding categories
based upon the statutory requirements of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), as well as previous federal
transportation legislation.
Available TAP funds are equal to the amount allotted to the program in Chapter 20, which is the
biennial state budget, ($7,049,000) in each of the four (4) years of the program cycle
($28,197,200) minus scheduled projects from other cycles that have yet to be delivered
($12,985,556) for total funds available of $15,211,644. The available funds are split most the
various areas consistent with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines. Similar
to other local programs, WisDOT honors the apportionment levels of FHWA funds available to
specific geographic regions.
Federal law mandates that the Wisconsin Department of Transportation distribute approximately
half of Wisconsin’s federally allocated Transportation Alternative Program funds to metropolitan
planning organizations (MPOs) serving larger urban areas with a population over 200,000, called
Transportation Management Areas (TMAs).
East Central Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (ECWRPC) is the metropolitan planning
organization (MPO)/Transportation Management Area (TMA) for the Appleton urbanized area.
The Appleton TMA’s annual sub allocation for the 2016-2020 TAP program cycle is $1,071,736.
Appleton TMA Policies
1. Eligible Project Categories:
The Appleton TMA will accept projects within only the following federally eligible
Transportation Alternatives Program categories:
o Construction of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and
other non-motorized forms of transportation;
o Construction of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe
routes for non-drivers;
o Conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrian,
bicyclists, or other non-motorized transportation users;
2
o Safe routes to school projects; and
o Bicycle and pedestrian plans.
2. Eligible Project Costs:
For infrastructure projects, funding will only be awarded for construction. Design, right of
way, and utilities costs will not be eligible expenses for TAP funds awarded by the Appleton
MPO.
3. Cost Share:
In order to stretch the limited funding available, projects may be required to provide a larger
local match than the required 20% minimum.
Timeline for 2016-2020 TAP Program Cycle
October 30, 2015 – Applications for 2016-2020 TAP Program Cycle Open
January 29, 2016 – 2016-2020 TAP Program Applications are due
February 22, 2016 – WisDOT NE Region staff sends EC staff which TAP Projects are
eligible and ineligible
Week of March 14th
, 2016 – Outreach to Appleton TMA TAP Selection Committee to
confirm participation on the selection committee and date to meet
Week of March 14th
, 2016 – Send out selection committee materials including TAP
applications, scoring criteria, and spreadsheet to record scores (these should be sent back
to Melissa Kraemer Badtke at mbadtke@ecwprc.org by 5pm on Thursday, March 24,
2016)
Week of March 28th
, 2016 – Appleton TMA Selection Committee meets to discuss TAP
Projects
Monday, April 4th
, 2016 – Appleton TMA Technical Advisory Committee discusses and
approves TAP Projects
Tuesday, April 12, 2016 – ECWRPC Transportation Committee – Committee reviews
recommendation from the Appleton TMA TAC and approves TAP Projects
Thursday, April 21, 2016 – ECWRPC Steering Committee on behalf of the entire
Commission approves on TAP Projects
By April 22, 2015 – ECWRPC Policy Board approves Appleton TMA Projects and
notifies WisDOT which projects are awarded Appleton TMA TAP funds and which
projects move to the statewide competition
Friday, April 29, 2015 – Full commission reaffirms the Resolution regarding the TAP
Projects for Appleton TMA
July/August 2016: WisDOT announces TAP Awards
Appleton TMA TAP Sub- Committee Members
A sub-committee will be made up of members from the technical advisory committee, the
bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee, and local and Regional Safe Routes to School
coalitions.
3
Approval Process
Below is the approval process for the Appleton TMA.
Appleton TMA TAP Subcommittee: makes recommendation to Appleton TAC for
projects to receive TAP funds.
Appleton TMA Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): Discusses and approves
projects to receive TAP funds.
Transportation Committee: Reviews recommendation from TAC and approves formal
resolution approving projects to receive TAP funds.
Steering Committee/Commission: Approves formal resolution from transportation
committee.
4
TAP Criteria for 2016-2020 Program Cycle – Appleton TMA
Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Projects Criteria
1. Planning and Preparation Points
0-10
points
Refer to the Narrative Response:
1. Sponsor demonstrates planning for the project
by including realistic project cost and timeline
in application.
2. Sponsor has planned for project prior to
application by including the improvement in the
municipality’s planning process or bicycle and
pedestrian plan, and/or similar planning
process. Application includes citations to
pertinent plan(s) that resulted from the process
that includes public input.
3. Sponsor has prepared for the project by
resolving any potential obstacles (real estate,
etc.) to project execution, or the project would
not cause any such obstacles.
4. Sponsor is prepared for project as evidence by
application that demonstrates community
support and/or regional collaboration with
respect to proposed project through the
government resolution of support for the
project.
2. Project Utility, Connectivity, and Safety Points
Items to consider within this section:
The project serves utilitarian rather than
recreational purposes.
The project connects existing multi-modal
transportation networks.
The project is within close proximity to a school
and/or commercial center.
Application includes data demonstrating that
project would go beyond community enhancement
to address a specific community need.
Application includes safety data to support the
need for the project.
Very Good 7.5 – 10
points
A bicycle or pedestrian project serving considerable
daily users in relation to the amount of funding
requested. A $200,000 project serving an estimated 200
users per day in a small community is the same as a $1
million project serving an estimated 1,000 users per
day in a large city. Because of the projects location
5
there is a certainty that the project will serve a strong
utilitarian/transportation purpose (work, shopping,
and/or school trips), clearly providing opportunities for
people to substitute a bicycle/pedestrian trip for an auto
trip.
Project is located within a mile of an economic,
employment, or commercial center.
Origins and destinations are neighborhoods,
downtowns and employment centers and
project is tied directly to these areas.
The project offers good network connections to
either other bikeways or bicycle compatible
roadways or sidewalk connections.
The community has made a commitment to
year round maintenance of the facility for
bicyclists and/or pedestrians.
Good 5-7.5
points
A bicycle and/or pedestrian project serving a
considerable number of users in relation to the amount
of funding being requested. Because of the project’s
location it will probably serve a mixture of recreational
and transportation purposes.
Project has close and discernible destinations,
and good network connections.
The community has committed to year-round
maintenance of the facility for bicyclists and/or
pedestrians.
Poor 2.5-5
points
A bicycle and pedestrian project serving a moderate
number of users in relation to the amount of funding
being requested. Because of the project’s location and
lack of destinations, it will probably serve more of a
recreation purpose.
Project offers one of the following: Close and
discernible destinations, and good network
connections.
The community has not committed to year-
round maintenance of the facility for bicycle
and/or pedestrians.
Deficient 0-2.5
points
A bicycle and pedestrian project serving a low to
moderate number of users in relation to the amount of
funding being requested. Because of the of the
project’s location and lack of destinations, it is likely
that the project will serve more of a recreation purpose
with a low number of utilitarian trips. As a general rule
of thumb, 5 miles is a typical travel length that
bicyclists will travel for utilitarian trips such as work,
school and shopping.
6
Project does not offer close and discernible
destinations or good network connects.
The community has not committed to year-round
maintenance of the facility for bicyclists and/or
pedestrians.
3. Livability – Environmental Justice & Public Health Impact Points
Items to consider in this section:
1. Project addresses environmental impact of
an existing transportation project.
2. Project addresses environmental impact of
Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) travel.
3. Project has a demonstrable impact upon
public health (i.e. provides connections to
health services, grocery stores, etc.) of the
applicant community.
Very Good 7.5-10
points Community has a high percentage of low
income community members.
Other demographics show that this community
represents an economically disadvantaged area.
Project would provide low income community
members with bicycle and pedestrian
connections to health services, grocery stores,
etc.).
Good 5-7.5
points Community has a moderate percentage of low
income community members that would benefit
from the project. Other demographics show that
this community represents an economically
disadvantaged area.
Project would provide low income community
members with bicycle and pedestrian
connections to health services, grocery stores,
etc.).
Poor 2.5-5
points Community has a low percentage of low
income community members that would benefit
from the project.
Other demographics do not show that this
community represents an economically
disadvantaged area.
The project would provide bicycle and
pedestrian connections to a few health services,
places of employment, grocery stores, etc.
Deficient 0-2.5
points The application does not present a case that the
affected area has much need.
The project does not connect with health
7
services, places of employment, grocery stores,
etc.
4. Historical Significance Points
0-5 points Refer to the Application Narrative Response:
1. Project has a strong historical benefit.
2. Project demonstrates a strong connection to
surface transportation.
5. History of Sponsor Success Points
0-5 points Refer to the Application and Narrative Response:
1. Sponsor has previously received WisDOT
multi-modal transportation improvement
funding and has demonstrated the capacity
to utilize such funding in a timely and
compliant manner.
OR
2. Sponsor is a new applicant to TAP but has
demonstrated throughout the application an
understanding of the program rules and
capacity to carry out the project.
AND
3. Sponsor has demonstrated successful
administration of other federal funding
awards.
6. Novel Project Idea/Project Innovation Points
0-5 points Refer to the Application and Narrative Response:
1. Sponsor proposed a novel project idea as
compared to projects previously funded with
WisDOT multi-modal program dollars; and/or
2. The proposed project would involve a unique or
novel partnership.
3. Regionally significant project for the bicycle
and pedestrian network.
8
SRTS Non-Infrastructure Projects
1. Planning and Preparation Points
Very good 7.5-10
points Sponsor has assessed what is needed in the
represented area and has involved stakeholders
in the process. Application addresses how this
application fits within other local SRTS
Projects.
The application shows that
communities/schools within the affected area
are supportive and engaged with the project or
sponsor. The application sponsor has a high
level of experience with SRTS and support for
SRTS goals. Sponsor has history of successful
SRTS or bicycle and pedestrian project.
Good 5-7.5
points Outreach has occurred to help the sponsor
understand needs in their area. Although no
formal assessment has been done information
has been gathered to assist in putting together
the application. In addition, some consideration
has been given to how this application fits in
with other local SRTS Projects.
The application shows that the
communities/schools within the affected area
are supportive and are likely to become
engaged with the project. The application
sponsor has some experience with SRTS and
support for SRTS goals. The sponsor has the
needed expertise to build a successful SRTS
project.
Sufficient 2.5-5
points It appears that little outreach has been done
with other SRTS programs in the affected area.
Only minor consideration has been given to
how this application fits within the broader
context of local SRTS Programs.
Some community/school support exists in the
affected area. The sponsor has the expertise to
build a successful SRTS project even if they do
not have much experience or highly engaged
communities/schools.
Deficient 0-2.5
points No evidence is provided to show outreach and
there seems to be no consideration of how a
larger program will interact with local
programs.
There is not enough information to determine
the existing support or sponsor expertise.
9
2. Project Utility, Connectivity, and Safety Points
Very Good 7.5 – 10
points The proposed approach will increase the
number of schools with successful SRTS
programs. Without this larger support programs
will be less likely to get more children
walking/bicycling or may not sustain their
program. Programs in the affected area have
struggled or are struggling to move
implementation forward.
The project has a high likelihood to get more
children walking and bicycling to school and/or
make it safer for those children already
walking/bicycling. The project tis very likely to
increase SRTS sustainability/momentum.
Project also addresses some of the following
outcomes:
Reduction in hazard busing
Change in policy limiting
walking/bicycling to school
Stronger school commitment to
promoting walking/bicycling
Addresses parent concerns that keep them
from allowing children to walk/bike
Targets unsafe behaviors by parents
and/or other community members in the
school zone
Makes it more appealing for children to
walk/bike
Includes law enforcement in partnering
on safety.
Good 5-7.5
points The proposed approach will help maintain
current levels of participation and has the
potential to bring on at least a small number of
new programs. Without this support some
locals may not be able to continue their SRTS
efforts.
The project is likely to get some more children
walking/bicycling and make it safer for some.
The project is likely to increase SRTS
sustainability/momentum. The project might
also lead to at least one additional positive
outcome listed above.
Sufficient 2.5-5
points The proposed approach will help maintain
current levels of participation. The application
doesn’t show whether new projects will be
10
started or if locals would be likely to continue
SRTS without the project.
The project may get more children
walking/bicycling and increase safety. The
project offers some likelihood of SRTS
sustainability/momentum. It is unclear if any
other additional outcomes can be expected from
the project.
Deficient 0-2.5
points Little information is provided to determine the
importance of the proposed approach in moving
SRTS forward.
It is unclear if the project will increase the
number of children walking/bicycling or
address safety concerns. Not enough
information is provided to determine if this
project will increase SRTS
sustainability/momentum.
3. Livability – Environmental Justice & Public Health Impact Points
Items to consider in this section:
1. Project addresses environmental impact of
an existing transportation project.
2. Project addresses environmental impact of
Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) travel by
reducing vehicle trips to and from school.
3. Project has a demonstrable impact upon
public health (i.e. provides connections to
health services, grocery stores, etc.) of the
applicant community.
Very Good 7.5 – 10
points A large number of participating or potentially
participating schools have a high percentage of
low income students. Communities seem
unlikely to be able to sustain SRTS programs
without assistance. Other demographics show
that this project will affect students in an
economically disadvantaged area.
Good 5-7.5
points Some participating schools have a high
percentage of low income students.
Communities likely would not be able to
sustain a SRTS program without assistance.
Other demographics show some economic
disadvantaged indicators in the affected area.
11
Sufficient 2.5-5
points A few participating schools are low income but
it is a low percentage of potential participants.
Communities may or may not be able to
undertake SRTS without assistance.
Deficient 0-2.5
points The application does not present a case that the
affected area has much need.
4. Historical Significance Points
0-5 points Refer to the Application Narrative Response:
1. Project has a strong historical benefit.
2. Project demonstrates a strong connection to
surface transportation.
5. History of Sponsor Success Points
0-5 points Refer to the Application and Narrative Response:
1. Sponsor has previously received WisDOT
multi-modal transportation improvement
funding and has demonstrated the capacity to
utilize such funding in a timely and compliant
manner.
2. OR
3. Sponsor is a new applicant to TAP but has
demonstrated throughout the application an
understanding of the program rules and capacity
to carry out the project.
a. AND
4. Sponsor has demonstrated successful
administration of other federal funding awards.
6. Novel Project Idea/Project Innovation Points
0-5 points Refer to the Application and Narrative Response:
1. Sponsor proposed a novel project idea as
compared to projects previously funded with
WisDOT multi-modal program dollars; and/or
2. The proposed project would involve a unique or
novel partnership.
Appleton TMA TAP Projects - Town of Grand Chute
Planning and
Preparation
Project Utility,
Connectivity, and Safety Livability Historical Significance History of Sponsor Success Novel Project or Idea Total Points Rank
Points available 10 points 10 points 10 points 5 points 5 points 5 points 45
Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Town of Grand Chute - CTH A
9.00 7.00 5.00 4.50 4.50 4.50 34.50
9.50 8.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 35.50
9.00 7.50 5.00 4.50 5.00 4.00 35.00
8.00 7.00 5.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 27.00
Average Score 8.88 7.38 5.00 3.75 4.00 4.00 33.00 33.00
AGENDA REQUEST
November13, 2017 TOPIC: Shall the Park Commission approve funding for installation and maintenance of a bicycle FixIt station
New Business Unfinished Business Reports
Closed Session Ordinance/Resolution
Meeting: Park Commission
Department Reporting: Public Works Submitted By: Karen M. Heyrman, P.E.
ISSUE: Attached is a request from Fox Cities Cycling Association to match 50% of the purchase price for a bicycle FixIt station.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Staff has discussed the potential locations including near the Town Center Park, near the FVTC campus, Tri-Park Student Housing Development, or near the Casaloma and STH 15 Kwik Trip.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends considering this donation
FISCAL IMPACT: BUDGET Matching funds would come from the trail repair account
ATTACHMENTS:
AGENDA REQUEST
November 13, 2017 TOPIC: Shall the Park Commission approve replacement of signs at Lions Park for $4,315.45
New Business Unfinished Business Reports
Closed Session Ordinance/Resolution
Meeting: Park Commission
Department Reporting: Public Works Submitted By: Mike Arft, Parks Foreman
ISSUE: The signs at Lions Park are slated for replacement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Building Repairs account includes $1,200 for replacement of the water heater at Patriot Park and $3,000 for miscellaneous facility repairs. These items are not planned for 2017 and with savings for other items in this account the fund balance is $8,800. Staff is requesting the Park Commission approve using this fund balance to replace the signs at Lions Park.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the replacement of signs at Lions Park for $4,315.45.
FISCAL IMPACT: BUDGET Fund balance in the building repairs account.
ATTACHMENTS: FastSigns quote