Losano vs. Martinez

Post on 08-Jul-2018

216 views 0 download

Transcript of Losano vs. Martinez

8/19/2019 Losano vs. Martinez

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/losano-vs-martinez 1/2

FLORENTINA A. LOZANO, petitionervs.

THE HONORABLE ANTONIO MARTINEZ and THE HONORABLE JOSEFLAMINIANO, respondents

G.R. No. L- !"#$

%e&e'(er #), #$)

FA*TS+ Batas Pambansa Bilang 22, popularly known as Bouncing CheckLaw, covers all kinds of checks, whether present dated or postdated, or whetherissued in payment of pre-existing obligations or given in mutual or simultaneousexchange for something of value BP 22 is aimed at putting ta stop to or curbing thepractice of issuing checks that are worthless, i e checks that end up being re!ectedor dishonored for payment BP 22 makes the act of issuing a worthless checkmalum prohibitum "hose who #uestion the constitutionality of BP 22 insist that$ %&'it o(ends the constitutional provision forbidding imprisonment for debt) %2' itimpairs freedom of contract) %*' it contravenes the e#ual protection clause) %+' itunduly delegates legislative and executive powers) and % ' its enactment is awedin that during its passage the .nterim Batasan violated the constitutional provisionprohibiting amendments to a bill on "hird /eading

ISS E+ 0hether or not BP 22 is a valid exercise of police power

R LING+ "he police power of the state has been described as the most

essential, insistent and illimitable of powers which enable it to prohibit all thingshurtful to the comfort, safety and welfare of society "he o(ense punished by BP 22is the act of making and issuing a worthless check or a check that is dishonoredupon its presentation for payment .t is not the non-payment of an obligation whichthe law punishes "he law is not intended or designed to coerce a debtor to pay hisdebt "he enactment of BP 22 is a declaration by the legislature that, as a matter of public policy, the making and issuance of a worthless check is deemed publicnuisance to be abated by the imposition of penal sanctions "he e(ects of theissuance of a worthless check transcends the private interests of the parties directlyinvolved in the transaction and touches he interests of the community at large "hemischief it creates is not only a wrong to the payee or holder, but also an in!ury tothe public "he harmful practice of putting valueless commercial papers incirculation, multiplied a thousand fold, can very well pollute the channels of tradeand commerce, in!ure the banking system and eventually hurt the welfare of thesociety and the public interest

.n sum, the court 1nds the enactment of BP22 a valid exercise of police power andis not repugnant to the constitutional inhibition against imprisonment for debt

8/19/2019 Losano vs. Martinez

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/losano-vs-martinez 2/2

Police power is a dynamic force that enables the state to meet the exigencies of changing times