Logical fallacies

Post on 19-Feb-2016

29 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Logical fallacies. Problems with premises Premise is false Premise is an unwarranted assumption Hidden premise. Attacking the person UFO sighters are crazy Members of the government must be lying because they are corrupt Name calling in itself is not a logical fallacy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Logical fallacies

Logical fallacies

• Problems with premises• Premise is false• Premise is an unwarranted assumption• Hidden premise

Ad hominem

• Attacking the person• UFO sighters are crazy• Members of the government must be lying because they are

corrupt• Name calling in itself is not a logical fallacy• “poisoning the well”• His argument is just like Hitler’s position

Appeal to authority

• Claim held by individual is true because that person speaks from authority• Airline pilots• Judges• Professors• Popular belief• Antiquity

• Similar to ‘appeal to nature’ – because something is natural it is justified

Begging the question

• Assuming that the conclusion is true in one of the premises

• Example:• “How long has it been since you stopped beating your

wife?”• Similar to tautology• Circular reasoning – conclusion is also the premise

Red herring

• Adding a ‘premise’ in order to distract the opponent from the real argument

False cause

• Assuming that two events are linked by cause when they may be just coincidental• Correlation in a controlled experiment, though, may suggest

causation• Similar to post-hoc ergo propter hoc• “After this, therefore because of this”

False analogy

• Assuming that two events / ideas are similar when they have some important difference

• Similar to composition / division• What’s true about one part of something has to be true for

all

Non-sequitur

• “doesn’t follow”• No logical connection exists

Slippery slope

• Assuming that, if you accept one premise, you also have to accept more extreme cases

• “if A happens, then Z will happen too. Therefore, A shouldn’t happen”

Black-or-white

• “either-or”, false dichotomy• Falsely assumes that there are only two alternatives

Special pleading

• Adding new premises to respond to critics and strengthen the argument

• Changing the rules of the game as you go • Similar to “moving goalpost”• Changing the criteria for a good argument if the opponent

comes up with evidence• Called ad-hoc reasoning

Straw Man

• Making the opponent’s argument into a position that is easier to attack

Hasty generalization

• Basing a conclusion on insufficient or biased evidence

Tu quoque

• “you too”• Responding to criticism by attacking the critic• Similar to ad hominem

Appeal to emotion

• Ad populum • Appeal to positive emotions (e.g. patriotism)• Appeal to negative emotions (e.g. fear)• May include slippery slope, irrelevant thesis, etc.