Logical fallacies
description
Transcript of Logical fallacies
Logical fallacies
• Problems with premises• Premise is false• Premise is an unwarranted assumption• Hidden premise
Ad hominem
• Attacking the person• UFO sighters are crazy• Members of the government must be lying because they are
corrupt• Name calling in itself is not a logical fallacy• “poisoning the well”• His argument is just like Hitler’s position
Appeal to authority
• Claim held by individual is true because that person speaks from authority• Airline pilots• Judges• Professors• Popular belief• Antiquity
• Similar to ‘appeal to nature’ – because something is natural it is justified
Begging the question
• Assuming that the conclusion is true in one of the premises
• Example:• “How long has it been since you stopped beating your
wife?”• Similar to tautology• Circular reasoning – conclusion is also the premise
Red herring
• Adding a ‘premise’ in order to distract the opponent from the real argument
False cause
• Assuming that two events are linked by cause when they may be just coincidental• Correlation in a controlled experiment, though, may suggest
causation• Similar to post-hoc ergo propter hoc• “After this, therefore because of this”
False analogy
• Assuming that two events / ideas are similar when they have some important difference
• Similar to composition / division• What’s true about one part of something has to be true for
all
Non-sequitur
• “doesn’t follow”• No logical connection exists
Slippery slope
• Assuming that, if you accept one premise, you also have to accept more extreme cases
• “if A happens, then Z will happen too. Therefore, A shouldn’t happen”
Black-or-white
• “either-or”, false dichotomy• Falsely assumes that there are only two alternatives
Special pleading
• Adding new premises to respond to critics and strengthen the argument
• Changing the rules of the game as you go • Similar to “moving goalpost”• Changing the criteria for a good argument if the opponent
comes up with evidence• Called ad-hoc reasoning
Straw Man
• Making the opponent’s argument into a position that is easier to attack
Hasty generalization
• Basing a conclusion on insufficient or biased evidence
Tu quoque
• “you too”• Responding to criticism by attacking the critic• Similar to ad hominem
Appeal to emotion
• Ad populum • Appeal to positive emotions (e.g. patriotism)• Appeal to negative emotions (e.g. fear)• May include slippery slope, irrelevant thesis, etc.
• http://atheistuniverse.net/photo/thou-shalt-not-commit-logical-fallacies
• http://www.theskepticsguide.org/resources/logicalfallacies.aspx
• http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/03/