L'Anguille River Riparian Modeling Biological and Agricultural Engineering 2010 Non-Point Source...

Post on 31-Dec-2015

214 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of L'Anguille River Riparian Modeling Biological and Agricultural Engineering 2010 Non-Point Source...

L'Anguille River Riparian Modeling

Biological and Agricultural Engineering

2010 Non-Point Source Project Review Meeting

Cooperative Extension Service

Dharmendra Saraswat

Naresh Pai

Functions of riparian buffer Vegetation- corridor of specific width-

adjacent to the banks of water bodies

Ecological health- temperature control, nitrogen filtering, bank stabilization

BMP - One of the best BMP for NPS control1

Establishment - NRCS- CRP/CREP/EQIP, and EPA- Cost share through 319(h)

Cooperative Extension Service

Photo : http://www.riparianinstitute.org

Photo: http://www.epa.gov

1(Mayer et al., 2005)

Riparian Buffer: Challenges and Opportunities

Cooperative Extension Service

Financial

Social

Physical

Constraints Identify where

they are needed most, or where they can perform best

Effectiveness

Farming Timber

logging Channelization Dredging

Disturbances

Quantify vegetation

composition in riparian buffer

Objective

Study Area: L’Anguille River Watershed (LRWS)

Cooperative Extension Service

Total Area under row crops (70%) soybean (42.3%), rice (14.9%),

Forest (21.2%),

(Source: Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies (CAST), 2006)

Source of impairment Drainage of the lowland

areas - ditching and channelization

Silt loads carried into the streams from row crops

Study stream banks to determine sources for sedimentation (Audubon, 2005)

How wide should be the buffer..?

Land Slope (%)

Riparian Forest

Buffer, ft

Filter Strip minimum widths, ft Total combined width, ft

Cropland Pastures Forest

0-1 35 10 20 25+0.25*25 60+6.25

1-3 35 15 20 50+0.25*25 85+12.5

3-8 35 20 50 50+0.25*25 85+12.5

8-20 35 25 100 70+0.25*25 105+17.5

20-40 35 25 100 90+0.25*25 125+22.5

Cooperative Extension Service

Riparian buffers- largest of the minimum combined width “vegetation (trees and filter strip practices) lying

within 45 m (147.5 ft) from the stream bank”

USDA-NRCS guidelines (Act 391 and 393):

Cooperative Extension Service

Input Data and Initial Effort

2006 natural color imagery Stream layer- NHD Plus (ADEQ) 2006 LULC Image

ADEQNHD Plus

Edited

Manually edit stream centerlines to ensure that they match location on natural color imagery

Cooperative Extension Service

Riparian Buffer- Data Issues

Approx. 360 km (225 miles) of streams data was manually createdScale used 1:700

ADEQNHD Plus

Edited

Algorithm Development

Use edited stream centerline and natural color imagery obtained in Spring 2006 to delineate stream banks

Create buffers from stream banks

Find vegetation composition within the buffers

Cooperative Extension Service

Leaf-off condition

Searching for the right image

Challenge: Reading entire county 1-m DOQQ and extracting pixel values

Solution: Used 97 Quarter Quads (QQ) sequentially

Operation: Extent of each QQ used for searching image under sample points

Cooperative Extension Service

Image search

Finding Stream Banks

Identify perpendiculars to the stream

Extract pixel values along perpendiculars

Identify stream banks using edge detection concept

x

y

bi-normal

Stream centerline

Cooperative Extension Service

6.886 6.8865 6.887 6.8875 6.888 6.8885 6.889 6.8895 6.89

x 105

3.8807

3.8807

3.8808

3.8809

3.8809

3.8809

3.881

3.8811

3.8811

x 106

Arkasas UTM easting, meters

Ark

ansa

s U

TM

nor

thin

g, m

eter

s

6.882 6.884 6.886 6.888 6.89 6.892 6.894 6.896 6.898

x 105

3.88

3.8805

3.881

3.8815x 10

6

Arkasas UTM easting, meters

Arka

nsas

UTM

nor

thin

g, m

eter

s

Results –Perpendiculars

sampled stream centerline identified perpendiculars

Cooperative Extension Service

6.886 6.8865 6.887 6.8875 6.888 6.8885 6.889 6.8895 6.89

x 105

3.8807

3.8807

3.8808

3.8809

3.8809

3.8809

3.881

3.8811

3.8811

x 106

Arkasas UTM easting, meters

Ark

ansas U

TM

nort

hin

g,

mete

rs

Results -Stream Boundary Delineation

Cooperative Extension Service

Error Analysis

Cooperative Extension Service

How much error can we expect from this method?

Mean error of 2.55 m (RMSE 3.41 m)

Compare with manually delineated streams in GIS

First Creek

Second Creek

Bushy Creek

Larkin Creek

L’Anguille River

SB SC SB SC SB SC SB SC SB SC

Urban (%) 1.1 1.2 1.9 1.8 1.9 2.9 1.2 1.8 1.4 6.6

Water (%) 0.7 0.8 1.7 2.0 8.8 9.1 0.3 2.0 6.6 34.3

Crops (%) 52.2 47.1 32.3 31.6 46.5 40.3 32.8 31.6 8.2 24.9

Forest (%) 45.1 49.7 63.3 64.1 41.5 46.2 63.1 64.1 83.0 32.3

Grass (%) 0.7 1.2 0.6 0.5 1.1 1.5 2.4 0.5 0.6 1.9

1

Results – Vegetation Composition

Cooperative Extension Service

Lower water pixels inventoried

Higher accuracy of riparian inventory

Stream Bank Stream Centerline

Summary

Algorithm developed to delineate stream banks: mean error 2.55 m (RMSE 3.41 m)

Riparian inventory shows >32% cropland acreage adjacent to tributaries

Lower water pixels inventoried resulted in higher accuracy of riparian inventory

Cooperative Extension Service

Acknowledgements

• Deano Traywick

• Center for Advanced Spatial Technology (CAST), Univ. of Arkansas

• Dr. Jackson Cothren, Univ. of Arkansas

Cooperative Extension Service