Post on 27-Mar-2015
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Minority Achievement and
Achievement Gap
End-Of-Grade & End-Of-Course Tests Results
1992-93 to 1999-2000
Gongshu Zhang Evaluation Section
Accountability Division NCDPI
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Part I
Student Achievement
Progress on End-Of-Grade (EOG)and End-Of-Course (EOC) Tests
[Note that data collection for some tests and/or groups of students
started after 1992-93]
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 1
All minority and white student groups have made progress since 1993 in terms of percentage of students at/above grade level
as well as mean scale scorein EOG Reading and Math
especially after implementation of the ABCs in 1996-97.
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Trend of Student Achievement Grades 3 - 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Trend of Student Achievement Grades 3 to 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Trend of Student Achievement Grades 3 to 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Score in by Ethnicity
140
142
144
146
148
150
152
154
156
158
160
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Mea
n S
cale
Sco
re
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Trend of Student Achievement: Grades 3 to 8 - 1993 to 2000Mean Scale Score in EOG Math by Ethnicity
State of North Carolina
148
150
152
154
156
158
160
162
164
166
168
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Mea
n S
cale
Sco
re
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 2
Most of the minority groups and the white group have made progress since 1995 in terms of percentage of students at/above grade level
as well as mean scale score in EOC English I and Algebra I ,
especially after implementation of the High School ABCs in 1998-99.
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on English I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Black
Am. Indian
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on Algebra I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
Asian
White
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on Biology EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on US History EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
1997-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on ELP EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Black
Am. Indian
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on English I EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
40
50
60
70
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Mea
n S
cale
Sco
re
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Black
Am. Indian
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on Algebra I EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
40
50
60
70
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Mea
n S
cale
Sco
re
Asian
White
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on Biology EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
40
50
60
70
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Mea
n S
cale
Sco
re
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on US History EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
40
50
60
70
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Mea
n S
cale
Sco
re
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
1997-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on ELP EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
40
50
60
70
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Mea
n S
cale
Sco
re
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Black
Am. Indian
Before ABCs After ABCs
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Part II
Student Achievement Gaps
Where Are the Gaps?How Big Are the Gaps?
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 3
Gaps exist between most of the minority groups and the white group on:
percentage of students at/above grade level, mean scale score,
percentage of students at Achievement Level IV, andmean scale score for the academically gifted students
in EOG Reading and Math
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades 3 - 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades 3 - 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gaps for EOG Reading 2000 Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels by Ethnicity
5.6 4.210.3 9.9 9.6
3.2
16.4
31.427.5 27.7
12.7
40.1
38.8
43.3
38.4
35.240.6
14.920.3 19.4
45.7
19.1
42.3
43.4
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
STATE Asian Black Hispanic Am. Indian White
Level I Level II Level III Level IV
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gaps for EOG Math 2000 Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels by Ethnicity
4.2 1.7 8.4 6 6 2.19.6
27.5
21.7 22
9.8
38
32.4
44.2
34.5
42.2
56.3
19.4
27.9 27.9
53.6
15.7
44.5
44.7
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
STATE Asian Black Hispanic Am. Indian White
Level I Level II Level III Level IV
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades 3 - 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
146
148
150
152
154
156
158
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Mea
n S
cale
Sco
re
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades 3 - 8 EOG Math: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
148
150
152
154
156
158
160
162
164
166
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Mea
n S
cale
Sco
re
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trend for Academically Gifted Students Grades 3 - 8
EOG Reading: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trend for Academically Gifted Students Grades 3 - 8
EOG Math: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 4
Gaps exist between the males and females within same ethnicityin percentage of students at/above grade level
on EOG Reading and Math.
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Gender Trends Grades 3 - 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
(%
)
A_F
A_M
B_F
B_M
H_F
H_M
AI_F
AI_M
NC_F
NC_M
W_F
W_M
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Gender Trends Grades 3 - 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
(%
)
A_F
A_M
B_F
B_M
H_F
H_M
AI_F
AI_M
NC_F
NC_M
W_F
W_M
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 5
Gaps exist between Non-Free/Reduced Lunch and Free/Reduced
Lunch Students within the same ethnicityin percentage of students at/above grade level
on EOG Reading and Math.
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gaps for Non-FRL and FRL Student Grades 3 - 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
50
60
70
80
90
1998-99 1999-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
NFRL_A
NFRL_W
NC_NONFRL
NFRL_AI
NFRL_H
FRL_W
NFRL_B
FRL_A
NC_FRL
FRL_H
FRL_AI
FRL_B
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gaps for Non-FRL and FRL Student Grades 3 - 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity
55
65
75
85
95
1998-99 1999-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
NFRL_A
NFRL_W
NC_NONFRL
NFRL_AI
FRL_A
NFRL_H
FRL_W
NFRL_B
FRL_H
NC_FRL
FRL_AI
FRL_B
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 6
Gaps exist between most of the minority student groups
and white students in percentage of students at/above grade level, and in percentage of students at Achievement Level IV
on Five Core Subject EOC Tests
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends for English I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity
30
40
50
60
70
80
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Black
Am. Indian
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends for Algebra I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity
30
40
50
60
70
80
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
(%
)
Asian
White
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends for Biology EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity
25
35
45
55
65
75
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends for US History EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity
21
31
41
51
61
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends for ELP EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity
30
40
50
60
70
80
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
(%
)
White
Asian
State
Hispanic
Black
Am. Indian
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 English I EOC
7.5 6.813.2 13.4 16.4
4.5
21.1
37.6 34.535.5
17.6
40.4
35.9
36.1
41.5
27.936.1
10.715.4 12
36.3
24.2
36.738.5
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
STATE Asian Black Hispanic Am. Indian White
Level I Level II Level III Level IV
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 Algebra I EOC
9.1 6.6
17.911.6 14.9
5.4
14.6
34.2
26.4
33.2
17.2
38.8
31.9
38
40
29.8
46.8
11.9
21.614
37.5
22.3
40.4
36.1
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
STATE Asian Black Hispanic Am. Indian White
Level I Level II Level III Level IV
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 Biology EOC
13.2 13.6
26.521.9 25.3
7.4
27.1
41.5
33.9
38.2
24.1
40.9
33.9
30.1
46.7
16.625.4
49.7
6.3
21.8
29.3
34.4
28
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
STATE Asian Black Hispanic Am. Indian White
Level I Level II Level III Level IV
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 US History EOC
16.7 17.8
30.8
19.727.3
10.5
31.8
44.6
41.7
45.4
32.9
32.631.5
21.5
37.9
14.318.9
4.18.5 5.8
18.7
36.5
30
20.5
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
STATE Asian Black Hispanic Am. Indian White
Level I Level II Level III Level IV
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 ELP EOC
9.5 10.518.3 15.6
24
5
20.9
36
31.1
34.2
17.4
38.533.7
30.6
40.5
28.834.9
10.918.9
11.2
37.1
23.3
34.4
34.9
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
STATE Asian Black Hispanic Am. Indian White
Level I Level II Level III Level IV
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 7
Gaps exist between the mean scale scores
of Level IV students in all ethnic groupsand the top margin of the Level IV score range on
EOGs & EOCs.
[Grade 3 only is shown as an example for EOG Tests.]
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Students and between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range
EOG Reading, Grade 3: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
148
150
152
154
156
158
160
162
164
166
168
170
172
174
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
960
Level III
Level IV
Asian
White
NC
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Students and between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range
EOG Math, Grade 3: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
146
148
150
152
154
156
158
160
162
164
166
168
170
172
174
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level III
Level VI
Asian
White
NC
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Studentsand between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range
English I EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level IV
Asian
White
NC
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Studentsand between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range
Algebra I EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level IV
Asian
White
NC
Am. Indian
Hispanic
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Studentsand between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range
Biology EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level IV
Asian
White
NC
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Studentsand between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range
US History EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re Level IV
Asian
White
NC
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Studentsand between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range
ELP EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level IV
Asian
White
NC
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Part III
Reduction of Student Achievement GapsHow Fast Have the Gaps Decreased?
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 8
The gaps between most of the minority and the white student groups
have decreased in EOG Reading and Math in percentage of students at/above grade level
since 1993, especially after implementation of the ABCs.
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Black & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level
26.7 25.5 25.8
29.128.828.7 28.8 29.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Black & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level
26.62424.4
30.7
32.432.232.7
31.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Hispanic & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level
21.521.5
22.422.1
15.216.8
18.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Hispanic & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level
18.8
15.416.9
19.9
16.116.418.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Am. Indian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level
21.421.6
24
27.428.9
30.729.8
27.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Am. Indian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level
18.61615.7
25.5
29.430.7 30.7
26.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Asian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level
4.65.8
4.94.3
-0.7
0.13.1
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Asian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level
-0.7 -1.1-0.4
-1.3
-5.5-6-3.4
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 9
The gaps in mean scale score between most of the minority and the white student groups
have increased somewhat in EOG Reading and Math from 1993 to 1996
but generally have held steady after implementation of the ABCs
from 1997 to 2000.
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Black & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Scores
7.1 7.26.97.26.6
6.4 6.57
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Black & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Mean Scale Scores
9.1 9.49.29.48.8
7.98.4
9.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Hispanic & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Scores
6.4 6.36.25.9
4.14.5 4.7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Hispanic & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Mean Scale Scores
7.37.3 7.47.2
5.25.56
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Am. Indian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Scores
66.2 5.9
6.76.3
6.5 6.56.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Am. Indian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Mean Scale Scores
6.76.5 6.4
7.97.3
7 7.27.3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Asian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Scores
0.80.9 10.5
-0.5-0.3
0
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps Trends between Asian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Mean Scale Scores
-1.9-1.5 -1.2
-1.8
-3-3.1-2.8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 10 The gaps between
most minority students and white students have been reduced in percentage
of students at/above grade level for E1 and in mean scale score for E1, BI, & USH;
but increased in percentage of students at/above grade level for BI & USH
and in mean scale score for A1 since 1995.
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on English I EOC
28.7
31.332.831.3 32.530
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Algebra I EOC
29.530.331.5
29.2 30.628.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Biology EOC
36.638.1
37.333.8
37.9 38.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on US History EOC
31.930.2
34.5
28.230.7 31
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on ELP EOC
31.831.1
31.930.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on English I EOC
25.8
23.924.7
19.122.9 23.4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Algebra I EOC
15.5
10.5
16.2
10.915.2
12.8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Biology EOC
24.424.3
19.4
10.7
20.422.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on US History EOC
1818.216.6
3.1
18.2 17
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on ELP EOC
24.323.6
21.6
24.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on English I EOC
28.630
32.531.3 32.831.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Algebra I EOC
25.5
19.3
3231.333.5
20.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Biology EOC
32.1
25.6
30.632.1 32.5
28.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on US History EOC
29.230.9
28.627.831 30.8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on ELP EOC
30.731.9
31.1 31.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Asian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on English I EOC
5.88.4
5.1
-0.8
2.36.2
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Asian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Algebra I EOC
-1.2
-5.2-6.4
-16.3
-11.7
-5
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Asian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Biology EOC
9.29.7
2.3
-5.4
2.45
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Asian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on US History EOC
6.2
1.7
-1.2
-6.3
-0.6
1.3
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Asian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on ELP EOC
13
7.510.6
9.1
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Black & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on English I EOC
6.36.36.6
7.3
6.5 6.4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Algebra I EOC
7.97.17
6.37
6.7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Biology EOC
7
7.57.2
7.87.5 7.4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on US History EOC
6.25.96
6.6
5.7 5.9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on ELP EOC
76.86.9 6.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on English I EOC
5.55.255.3 5.3
4.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Algebra I EOC
4.5
3.33.7
2.6
3.63.3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Biology EOC
554.2
1.6
4.14.9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on US History EOC
3.43.43
0.1
33.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on ELP EOC
5.35.2 5 5.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on English I EOC
6.36.46.5
7.36.7
6.3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Algebra I EOC
6.8
4.8
777.6
5.1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Biology EOC
6.4
5
6.2
10
6.4
5.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on US History EOC
5.65.75.7
8.9
5.4 5.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on ELP EOC
6.86.9 6.8 6.9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Me
an
Sc
ale
Sc
ore
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Asian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on English I EOC
0.51.1
0.70.70.2 0.6
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Asian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Algebra I EOC
-1.7-1.8-2.3
-4.5
-3.8
-2.1
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Asian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Biology EOC
11.4
0
-2.2
0.3 0.3
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Asian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on US History EOC
1.1
0.2
-0.1
-2.2
-0.6
0.4
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement Gaps between Asian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on ELP EOC
2.5
1.4 1.61.4
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
(%
)
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 11 For three matched student cohorts:
Grade 3 in 1997 to Grade 6 in 2000Grade 4 in 1997 to Grade 7 in 2000
Grade 5 in 1997 to Grade 8 in 2000, the gaps in mean scale score
between most of the minority groups and white students have increased
in EOG Reading and Matheach year from 1997 to 2000.
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends in Reading for a Level IV Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000
Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
150
152
154
156
158
160
162
164
166
168
170
172
174
176
178
180
182
184
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level IVG3
G4
G5G6
G3
G6
G5
G4
Level IV
Asian
White
NC
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends in Math for a Level IV Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000
Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
150152154156158160162164166168170172174176178180182184186188190192194196198
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level IV
G3
G4
G5
G3
G6
G6
G5
G4
Level IV
Asian
White
NC
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends in Reading for a Level III Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000
Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
140
142
144
146
148
150
152
154
156
158
160
162
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level III
G3
G4
G5
G6
G3
G6
G5
G4Level III
Asian
White
Hispanic
NC
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends in Math for a Level III Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000
Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
138
140
142
144
146
148
150
152
154
156
158
160
162
164
166
168
170
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level III
G3
G4
G5
G6
G3
G6
G5
G4
Level III
Asian
White
Hispanic
NC
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends in Reading for a Level II Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000
Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
130
132
134
136
138
140
142
144
146
148
150
152
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level II
G3
G4
G5
G6
G3
G6
G4
G5
Level II
Asian
White
Hispanic
NC
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends in Math for a Level II Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000
Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
124
126
128
130
132
134
136
138
140
142
144
146
148
150
152
154
156
158
160
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level II
G4
G5
G6
G7
G4
G7
G6
G5
Level II
Asian
White
Hispanic
NC
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends in Reading for a Level I Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000
Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
114
116
118
120
122
124
126
128
130
132
134
136
138
140
142
144
146
148
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level I
G3
G4
G5
G6
G3
G6
G4
G5
Level I
White
Asian
Hispanic
NC
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Student Achievement Gap Trends in Math for a Level I Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000
Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
98100102104106108110112114116118120122124126128130132134136138140142144146148150152
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level I
G4
G5
G6
G7
G4
G7
G6
G5Level I
Asian
White
Hispanic
NC
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Finding 12 For three cohorts of
matched academically gifted students, there were constant gaps in terms of mean scale
scores on EOG Reading and increasing gaps on EOG Math between
most of the minority student groups and white students from 1997 to 2000.
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement of AG Student Cohort on EOG Reading Grade 3 in 1997 to Grade 6 in 2000
Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
150
152
154
156
158
160
162
164
166
168
170
172
174
176
178
180
182
184
186
188
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level IV
G3
G4
G5
G6
G3
G6
G5
G4
Level IV
White
Asian
NC
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Achievement of AG Student Cohort on EOG Math Grade 3 in 1997 to Grade 6 in 2000
Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity
150152154156158160162164166168170172174176178180182184186188190192194196198200202204206208
1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Me
an S
cale
Sco
re
Level IV
G3
G4
G5
G3
G6
G6
G5
G4
Level IV
Asian
White
NC
Hispanic
Am. Indian
Black
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Part IVConclusions and Suggestions
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Conclusions
• All ethnic groups have made progress in terms of percentage of students at/above grade level as well as mean scale score since 1993.
• For EOGs, the gaps between most of the minority student groups and white students have been reduced in percentage of students at/above grade level but increased in mean scale score since 1993.
• For EOCs, the gaps have been reduced in percentage of students at/above grade level for E1 and in mean scale score for E1, BI, & USH, but increased in percentage of students at/above grade level for BI & USH and in mean scale score for A1 since 1995.
• The gaps in mean scale score between most of the minority groups and the white students were bigger at levels III & IV than at levels I & II. Also, there were big gaps among mean scale scores for all Level IV student groups and the top margin of the Level IV score range for all courses in EOG from 1993 to 2000 and in EOC from 1995 to 2000.
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Conclusions (Continue) • For matched student cohorts, the gaps in mean scale score between
most of the minority student groups and white students have increased for EOG Reading and Math since 1997.
• For matched AG student cohorts, there were gaps in mean scale score among most of the minority student groups and white students in EOG Reading and Math from 1997 to 2000.
• The maximum gaps for the 2000 EOG, in terms of percentage of students at/above grade level, among the subgroups of students are:
– about 25% by ethnic group (e.g., 85%-60%),
– about 35% by ethnic group by gender (e.g., 87%-52%),
– about 36% by ethnic group by poverty level (e.g., 89%-53%).
• Most of the gaps on EOGs and EOCs, in terms of percentage of students at/above grade level, have decreased since 1993 and 1995 respectively, especially after the implementation of the ABCs. However, the rate of reduction is slow.
January 2001 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt
Attending to All Students We should pay attention to the percentage of minority
students, as well as economically & educationally disadvantaged
students, at/above grade level. At the same time we should attend to the mean scale scores of those students.
We should continue to work hard to help low achievement students move above grade level. At the same time we should work very hard to help minority students, as well as economically &
educationally disadvantaged students at all four achievement levels
to achieve higher scale scores.
Also, we should work very hard to help high Achievement
students including the academically gifted students in all ethnic groups
to achieve continuous progress and to move to the top margin of the
score range of Level IV.