Post on 06-Feb-2016
description
Holistic, part-based and semantic processes in face recognition:
Dissociations and interactions
¹ Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
² Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care
³ Centre for Vision Research, York University
In collaboration with:
David AnakiJosee Rivest
Sandra BlackLarry LeachYakir KaufmanBruce Bolster
• Historical background
• Enduring problems
• New studies
• Dissociations among three agnosic patients
• Prosopagnosia (patient DC)
• Object agnosia (patient CK)
• Pure alexia (patient CM)
• Semantic/associative prosopagnosia (patient AP)
• Interactions among face, object, and semantic systems
Outline
Historical background
Bodamer, 1947
Definition: prosopagnosia
Acquired inability to recognize familiar faces from vision
• Recognition triggered by alternative means: ex.: voice, paraphernalia, gait
• Appropriate semantic information about familiar people
• Good visual acuity • Face recognition may be achieved by a feature-by-
feature approach (?)
Must NOT be secondary to:• sensory loss • general intellectual loss • memory & language problems • or a combination of these factors
RECOGNITION impairment...
Associated Recognition Deficits
• Object agnosia
• Pure alexia • Good visual acuity • Good semantic memory/processing• Appropriate orthographic units • No agraphia, no aphasia • Letter-by-letter readers
But again… dissociations:
• Prosopagnosia with alexia but without object agnosia
(e.g. Buxbaum, Glosser & Coslett, 1998, De Renzi & di Pellegrino, 1998)
• Prosopagnosia with object agnosia but without alexia
(e.g. Humphreys & Riddoch, 1989)
• Object agnosia without prosopagnosia or alexia
(e.g. Humphreys & Rumiati, 1998; Rumiati, Humphreys, Riddoch & Bateman, 1994)
+
Neuroanatomy
From patients…
• Bilateral damage in the occipitotemporal cortices:- the inferior temporo-occipital regions - the lingual and fusiform gyri (e.g. Damasio, Damasio & Van Hoesen, 1982;
Takahashi, Kawamura, Hirayama, Shiota & Isono, 1995)
• A right hemisphere lesion (in the equivalent areas) - may be sufficient (e.g. De Renzi, 1986a; Landis, Regard & Bliestle, 1988; Rapcsak, Polster,
Comer & Rubens, 1994; Takahashi et al., 1995)
More evidence…
“Normal” human brains: fMRI studies
- the fusiform gyri (Face Fusiform Area: FFA) (e.g. Kanwisher, Woods, Iacoboni & Mazziotta, 1997)
A PET study- the medial fusiform gyri (areas 19-37) - the right parahippocampal gyrus (area 36) - the anterior region of the temporal poles (Sergent & Signoret, 1992)
1. Modularity vs. General Purpose2. Representations vs. Processes3. Face-specific vs.Individuation or Expertise4. Focal/Localized vs. Distributed5. Laterilzed vs. Bilateral6. Holistic vs. Analytic or part-based7. Different versions of holistic
Enduring Debates: Are faces special?
CK - Object Agnosia & Alexia
Behrmann, Moscovitch & Winocur (1994)
Behrmann, Winocur & Moscovitch (1992)
Moscovitch, Winocur & Behrmann (1997)
• 41-year old man• 16 years education (MA degree)• Manager • Closed-head injury: hit by a car when jogging• Bilateral thinning in the occipito-temporal regions
Behrmann, Moscovitch & Winocur (1994)
Behrmann, Winocur & Moscovitch (1992)
Moscovitch, Winocur & Behrmann (1997)
• Word recognition (reading)
• Object recognition• Residual blindness
in upper left field
IMPAIRED
• Average IQ • Acuity• Upright face recognition• Visual construction abilities• Memory • Semantic knowledge
NORMAL
CK - Object Agnosia & Alexia
Face module
• Features - primarily internal
• At least two of three needed
• Orientation specific - 0 (upright) to 60-90 degrees
• Global configurational properties– template and/or second order relations
Face counterpart in object system
• Feature - internal and external
• Distinctive? Verbalizable?
• Orientation sensitive
• Categorical or local relations (jig-saw effect)
• Integration of features and relations
Interaction of face and face counterpart
• Mapping of features and relations in counterpart to holistic face representations stored in long-term memory (FRUs)
• Interactive activation between systems: face, object, and semantics
Part-based
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Upright faces Inverted faces
Double dissociation
Words X X
CK DC
Faces
Objects
√
X √
X
√
Recognition CM
√
√
Patients
More dissociations
CK DC
Faces
Objects
Words
√
X
X
√
X
√
Recognition CM
√
X
√
Patients
CK DC
Faces
Objects
Words
√
X
X
√
X
√
Recognition CM
√
X
√
Patients
Prosopagnosia
Object Agnosia& Alexia
Pure Alexia
DC - Prosopagnosia
• 54-year old man• 16 years education• Detective for the homicide division of a police
force (on disability)• Colloid cyst hydrocephalus• Posterior cerebral artery infarction
DC - Prosopagnosia
• Bilateral lesions in the lingual
gyri, Brodmann Areas 18 & 19
R L
DC - Prosopagnosia
• Bilateral lesions in the lingual gyri: more atrophy to the right fusiform gyrus than the left
R L
• Superior IQ • • AcuityAcuity• Object recognition• Reading • Visual construction abilities• Space perception • Colour vision• Memory • Semantic knowledge
• Face recognition• Bilateral superior
field deficits
IMPAIRED NORMAL
DC - Prosopagnosia
Face recognition:
Famous faces
slow —no instant recognition Looks like a “piecemeal” approach
Bob Hope: “I will guess that it is Bob Hope. He has a long nose, his hair cut is him too, a side ways grin; I am not 100% sure that it is him...”
Hollywood stars• Jerry Seinfeld: “I do not know, an ordinary guy” “Oh, Jerry”
—watched Seinfeld at least once a day • Denzel Washington: “a US ball player”
—described many movies that he was acting in • Michelle Pfeiffer: “A model: Sharon Stone? Christie Brinkley?”
His family members and myselfwith hair covered:
• misidentified his son (who was in the testing room)• misidentified me
CM - Pure Alexia
• 35-year old man• 15 years of education• Computer programming• Closed-head injury / drugs• Temporal occipital abnormalities on EEG
CM - Pure Alexia
IMPAIRED NORMAL
• Word recognition (reading): Letter-by-letter reader
• High average IQ• Acuity• Face recognition• Object recognition• Visuo-spatial abilities
Is there one part-based system?
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Processing systems
Part-based
Are there separate part-based systems?
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Processing systems
Part-based Part-based
Does part-based face recognition depend on one or both part-based systems?
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Processing systems
Part-based Part-based
CK - Object Agnosia & Alexia
Moscovitch, Winocur & Berhmann (1997)
Part-based
OBJECTS WORDS
Intact upright face recognition
Holistic
FACES
Part-based
CM - Pure Alexia
OBJECTS WORDSFACES
Part-based Part-basedHolistic
Intact face and object recognition
Can part-based face recognition rely only on systems mediating recognition of objects and words?
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Part-based Part-based
Or does it rely on the interaction between part-based and holistic systems ?
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Part-based Part-based
DC - Prosopagnosia
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Part-based Part-based
Intact object and word recognition
CK CM DC
Faces
Objects
Words
√
X
X
√
X
√ √
X
√
Recognition
Participants
Brain-damaged Control
DCB
√
√
√
Controls
n=12
√
√
√
• Upright faces
Tasks: Face recognition
Mean Number of Famous People Recognized from Photos (Max. = 70)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Controls CK DC DCBCM
perfect score
Mea
n N
umbe
r of
Peo
ple
Rec
ogni
zed
Results
Caricatures of Famous People
Ronald ReganWoody Allen
Caricatures of Famous People Recognized (Max. = 29)
Perc
ent m
ean
reco
gnit
ion
0102030405060708090
100
Controls CK DC DCB
Perc
ent c
orre
ct id
enti
fica
tion
0102030405060708090
100
Controls CK DC DCB
Mothers
Fathers
Child
Percent of Correct Responses on a Seven-Item Forced Choice Recognition Test for Identifying Each of the
“Parent” Photos from the Photo of a “Child”
0102030405060708090
100
DC DCBControls CK CM
Perc
ent m
ean
reco
gnit
ion
Tasks: Face recognition
• Fractured • Disguised
Faces
• Inverted
Who is:
• InvertedJason Alexander
George
Who is:
• Fractured Oprah
Who is:
• Disguised Eddie Murphy
Perc
ent R
ecog
nize
d
Results
Controls CK DC DCBCM0
102030405060708090
100
Percentage of Correct Recognition of Inverted Faces
Percentage of Correct Recognition of Fractured Faces
Results
0102030405060708090
100Pe
rcen
t R
ecog
nize
d
Controls CK DC DCBCM
0102030405060708090
100Pe
rcen
t Rec
ogni
zed
Percentage of Correct Recognition of Disguised Faces
Controls CK DC DCBCM
Results
Summary of findingsDamaged systemsFace
recognitiontasks
Object & Word
Disguised
Upright
Fractured
Inverted
√
X
√
X
Face
X
X
X
X
Word
√
√
√
√
There are separate part-based systems
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Part-based Part-based
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Part-based Part-based
Only the part-based object system contributes to some aspects
of face recognition
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Part-based Part-based
It does so by interacting with an intact upright face-system
Percent of Upright Cartoon Faces Identified Correctly (Max. = 31)
0102030405060708090
100
Controls CK CM DC DCB
Perc
ent m
ean
reco
gnit
ion
Percent of Inverted Cartoon Faces Identified Correctly (Max. = 31)
0102030405060708090
100
DC DCBControls CK CM
Perc
ent m
ean
reco
gnit
ion
Internal Features Inverted
Jacqueline Kennedy Robin Williams
Mean Correct Recognition of Photos of Famous People When Upright and Intact and
When Internal Features Were Inverted
Internal Inverted (Max. = 11) Intact (Max. = 11)
0
2
4
6
8
10
DC DCBControls CK CM
0
2
4
6
8
10
DCBControls CK CM DC
Mea
n C
orre
ct R
ecog
niti
on
External Features Inverted
Meg Ryan
Mean Correct Recognition of Photos of Famous People When Upright and Intact and
When External Features Were Inverted
External Inverted (Max. = 12) Intact (Max. = 12)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
DC DCBControls CK CM
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
DC DCBControls CK CM
Mea
n C
orre
ct R
ecog
niti
on
Semantic system
OBJECTS WORDS
holistic
FACES
Recognition
Part-based
Structural representation
Recognition
Semantic system
OBJECTS WORDS
holistic
FACES
Part-based
Corresponding structural representation
Misaligned Along the Vertical Midline
Elizabeth Taylor
Mean Correct Recognition of Photos of Famous People That Are Intact or Misaligned Along the Vertical Midline
(Max. = 10)
Misaligned Vertical Intact
10
0
2
4
6
8
10
DC DCBControls CK CM
0
2
4
6
8
DC DCBControls CK CM
Mea
n C
orre
ct
Misaligned Along the Horizontal Midline
Madonna
Mean Correct Recognition of Photos of Famous People That Are Intact or Misaligned Along the Horizontal Midline
(Max. = 10)
Misaligned Horizontal Intact
10
0
2
4
6
8
DC DCBControls CK CM
0
2
4
6
8
10
DC DCBControls CK CM
Mea
n C
orre
ct
Dan Akroyd
Mean Correct Forced-Choice Recognition of Single Isolated Face Parts (Eyes, Nose, or Mouth)
for Identified Faces of Famous People (Max. = 15)
Identified Recognized Part
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
DC DCBControls CK CM
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
DC DCBControls CK CM
Mea
n C
orre
ct R
ecog
niti
on
Mean Correct Forced-Choice Recognition of Single Isolated Face Parts (Eyes, Nose, or Mouth)
for Non-Identified Faces of Famous People (Max. = 15)
Non Identified Recognized Part
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
DC DCBControls CK CM
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
DC DCBControls CK CM
Mea
n C
orre
ct R
ecog
niti
on
Bev Doolittle: The forest has eyes
CK - Object Agnosia & Alexia
OBJECTS WORDS
Intact upright & disguised face recognition
Holistic
FACES
Part-based Part-based
DC - Prosopagnosia
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Part-based Part-based
Impairment of all aspects of face recognition
Damage to the holistic face system leads to global face recognition deficits
OBJECTS WORDS
Holistic
FACES
Part-based Part-based
Face Representation
Depth segregation and “closure” for faces and objects
Mooney Faces and Objects
Correct Identification of Mooney Faces and Objects
Faces (Max. = 7) Objects (Max. = 9)
0
2
4
6
DC DCBControls CK
0
2
4
6
8
DC DCBControls CK
Mea
n C
orre
ct I
dent
ific
atio
n
Depth Segregation for Faces and Objects
William Shakespeare
Pierre E. Trudeau
Michael Jackson
Bob HopeEddie Murphy
Percent Correct Identification and Forced Choice Recognition of Overlapping Caricatures of Famous People (Max. = 27)
Identification Forced Choice Recognition
0
20
40
60
80
100
Controls CK DC DCBCM
0
20
40
60
80
100
Controls CK DC DCBCM
Perc
ent C
orre
ct
ArcimboldoIdentity of Composite
Faces (i.e. made of objects)