Post on 23-Mar-2021
European Journal of Education Studies ISSN: 2501 - 1111
ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111
Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu
Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. 235
DOI: 10.46827/ejrs.v8i1.3535 Volume 3 │ Issue 1 │ 2021
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF
TURKISH AND REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN:
FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)i
Nuran Tuncerii
Faculty of Education,
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University,
Tokat, Turkey
orcid.org/0000-0002-8748-5084
Abstract:
Executive function skills constitute an important basis for learning and adaptation in
early childhood. The executive function skills can easily improve in children who uses
good practices in preschool. These skills are especially important because they help
children overcome all complex tasks required to manage themselves. The aim of the
present study was to examine abstraction and cognitive flexibility components, which
are important components of executive functions, in 4-6-year-old Turkish children and
refugee children attending kindergarten and nursery school using Flexible Item Selection
Task (FIST). In addition, the research aimed to compare the abstraction and cognitive
flexibility according to gender and age variables using three different sections: Turkish
students attending kindergarten, Turkish students attending nursery school and refugee
children attending nursery school. The study was a survey type of quantitative research,
and a cross-sectional survey approach was used. The participants were 99 Turkish and
refugee children who were 4-6-year-old and attended kindergarten and nursery schools
in central town of a province in Turkey. The schools where 48-60-month-old children are
taught are called kindergarten in Turkey while the schools for 61-72-month-olds are
called nursery schools. The study included one kindergarten and two nursery schools.
These schools are located in the city center, long distances from each other and in
different neighborhoods. The Turkish children in the study were both kindergarten and
nursery school children whereas refugee children were only nursery school children who
attended to the nursery school together with Turkish children. Children were evaluated
by their class-gender and class-age combinations. There were 16 Turkish boys and 16
Turkish girls attending kindergarten, 17 Turkish boys and 19 Turkish girls attending
nursery school, and 16 refugee boys and 15 refugee girls attending nursery school. In
terms of class-age combinations, there were 15 Turkish students in kindergarten, 16
i OKUL ÖNCESİ DÖNEMDEKİ TÜRK VE MÜLTECİ ÇOCUKLARIN YÜRÜTÜCÜ İŞLEV
BECERİLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI: NESNE SEÇİMİNDE ESNEKLİK GÖREVİ (NSEG) ii Correspondence: email nurantuncer72@gmail.com, nuran.tuncer@gop.edu.tr
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 236
Turkish students in nursery school and 16 refugee students in nursery school in 48-60-
month age group while 61-72 months age group had 17 Turkish students in kindergarten,
20 Turkish students in nursery school and 15 refugee students in nursery school. Flexible
Item Selection Task (FIST) was used as the data collection tool in the study. The
implementation of the measuring tool was carried out individually with each child by
the researcher and took about 10 minutes. The results of the study revealed that there
was no significant difference among Turkish kindergarten, nursery school and refugee
children nursery school groups for abstraction scores based on gender and age groups.
However, a significant difference was found between Turkish and refugee children for
the cognitive flexibility scores. While the gender and age groups of Turkish and refugee
children attending kindergarten had no significant differences for the abstraction
component, there was a significant difference between gender and age groups for
cognitive flexibility scores. For a more detailed analysis, studies dealing with high-level
cognitive skills and working memory, one of the components of executive functions, are
needed.
Keywords: abstraction component, cognitive flexibility, early childhood education, pre-
school education, pre-school teacher
Özet:
Yürütücü işlev becerileri erken çocukluk yıllarında öğrenme ve uyum için önemli bir
temel oluşturmaktadır. Okul öncesi dönemde iyi uygulamalarla pratik yapan çocukların
yürütücü işlev becerileri kolayca gelişebilmektedir. Bu beceriler çocukların özellikle
kendilerini yönetebilmelerini gerektiren tüm karmaşık görevleri üstesinden gelmesine
yardımcı olacağı için önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı anaokulu ve anasınıfına devam
eden 4-6 yaş Türk çocuklarla mülteci çocukların yürütücü işlevlerin önemli
bileşenlerinden olan soyutlama becerisi ve bilişsel esnekliği, Nesne Seçiminde Esneklik
Görevi (NSEG) kullanarak incelemektir. Aynı zamanda araştırmada 4-6 yaş çocukları
anaokulu, anasınıfı ve mülteci çocuklar olmak üzere üç farklı kesit alınarak cinsiyet ve
yaş değişkenlerine göre soyutlama becerisi ve bilişsel esnekliği karşılaştırmak
amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma nicel araştırma modellerinden tarama modeli niteliğindedir.
Tarama modellerinden kesitsel tarama modeli olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Araştırmada 4-
6 yaş arasındaki Türk ve mülteci çocukların yürütücü işlevlerinin karşılaştırılması
örneklemindeki katılımcılar Türkiye'nin bir şehir merkezinde bulunan anaokulu ve
anasınıfına devam eden Türk ve mülteci çocuklardan oluşmaktadır. Katılımcılar
Türkiye'de bir il merkezinde bulunan anaokulu ve anasınıfına giden 4-6 yaşlarındaki 99
Türk ve mülteci çocuktu. Türkiye'de 48-60 aylık çocukların eğitim gördüğü okullara
anaokulu, 61-72 aylık çocukların ait okullara ise anasınıfı adı verilmektedir. Çalışmada
bir anaokulu ve iki anasınıfı içeriyordu. Bu okullar şehir merkezinde, birbirinden uzun
mesafelerde ve farklı mahallelerde yer alıyordu. Çalışmaya katılan Türk çocukları hem
anaokulu hem de anasınıfı çocukları iken, mülteci çocukları sadece, Türk çocuklarla
birlikte anasınıfına giden çocuklar. Çocuklar sınıf-cinsiyet ve sınıf-yaş kombinasyonları
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 237
şeklinde değerlendirildi. Çalışma, anaokuluna giden 16 Türk erkek ve 16 Türk kızı,
anasınıfına giden 17 Türk erkek ve 19 Türk kızı, anasınıfına giden 16 mülteci erkek ve 15
mülteci kızı içeriyordu. Sınıf-yaş kombinasyonları olarak, 48-60 ay yaş grubunda,
anaokuluna giden 15 Türk öğrenci, anasınıfına giden 16 Türk öğrenci ve anasınıfına
giden 16 mülteci öğrenci varken, 61-72 ay yaş grubunda, anaokuluna giden 17 Türk
öğrenci, anasınıfına giden 20 Türk öğrenci ve anasınıfına giden 15 mülteci öğrenci
bulunuyordu. Çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak Nesne Seçiminde Esneklik Görevi
ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Ölçüm aracının uygulanması her çocuk için araştırmacı tarafından
bireysel olarak gerçekleştirilmiş ve yaklaşık 10 dakika sürmüştür. Toplamda çalışma
grubu olarak belirlenen 99 okulöncesi dönemi çocuğu ile araştırma yürütülmüştür.
Çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak Flexible Item Selection Task (FIST) aracı
kullanılmıştır. Yaklaşık 10 dakika süren ölçme aracının uygulanması araştırmacı
tarafından her bir çocukla bireysel olarak yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonunda, çalışmaya
katılan okulöncesi çocuklarının bulunduğu Türk anaokulu anasınıfı ve mülteci çocuk
gruplarına göre soyutlama becerileri puanlarında, yaşa ve cinsiyete göre anlamlı bir
farklılık olmadığı görülmüştür. Buna karşılık Türk ve mülteci çocukların bilişsel esneklik
puanları arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmuştur. Bunun yanında, anaokuluna devam
eden Türk ve mülteci çocukların cinsiyetlerine ve yaşlarına göre soyutlama becerilerinde
anlamlı bir farklılığa rastlanmazken, bilişsel esneklik puanları arasında cinsiyet ve yaşa
göre anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Durumun daha detaylı analizi için üst
düzey bilişsel becerileri kapsayan ve yürütücü işlevlerin bileşenlerinden biri olan çalışma
belleğinin ölçüldüğü çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: bilişsel esneklik, erken çocukluk eğitimi, okul öncesi eğitim, okul
öncesi öğretmeni, soyutlama becerisi
1. Introduction
Executive function skills are important in child development and can be observed at early
ages. Determining these skills at earlier ages and supporting children for their
deficiencies can promote their cognitive and social development and play crucial role in
the planning of their educational lives. This role makes more sense when implemented
in a way to include the disadvantaged children. Refugees in Turkey constitute such a
disadvantaged group.
Refugee children are exposed and try to adapt to the daily changes in Turkey,
which is a transit country for refugees. They have to deal with cultural conflicts and
difficult migration processes, and have to adapt to their educational lives. Little is known
about the executive function skills of these children, which might play a key role in their
cognitive and social development. In addition, previous studies found that weaknesses
in executive function skills are easier to improve with various intervention programs
from early childhood years, and that children respond better to early intervention
programs (Barnett et al., 2008). Therefore, interventions in preschool years were reported
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 238
to work best (Benson, Sabbagh, Carlson, & Zelazo, 2013; Kaufman, 2010; Tuncer & Avcı,
2019; Tuncer 2018; Vitiello & Greenfield, 2017; Welsh, Nix, Blair, Bierman, & Nelson, 2010;
Zelazo, 2004). In addition, studies showed that executive function skills could help
explain the low and high socioeconomic level and understand the widening income
inequality among children over the past few years (Cahalan & Perna, 2015). Thus, it is
necessary to determine the executive function skills of refugee children in Turkey in order
to support their cognitive processes with the help from peers/friends, schools and
teachers and to plan a support system that will bring their executive function skills to the
same level as the children of the country in which they are located and to make equal use
of the same educational environments. Although many studies were carried out on the
conditions of refugee children in Turkey (Emin, 2019; Kaya, 2019; Sallan, Turkmen &
Kayhan, 2019; Sezgin, 2019; Moralı, 2018; Kardeş & Akman, 2018; Korkut, 2018; Akpınar,
2017; Gümüşten, 2017; Sağlam, 2017; Tüzün, 2017; Kağnıcı, 2017; Uzun & Bütün, 2016;
Yavuz & Mızrak, 2016; Şeker, 2015), there has been no studies, to the best of our
knowledge, comparing their executive functions with their peers. The present study is
important for planning the education of refugee children more realistically in early
childhood by comparing their executive function skills with those of Turkish children.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Executive Functions
Executive functions are a number of cognitive skills that play a key role in learning and
behavioral regulation (Nayfeld, Fuccillo, & Greenfield, 2013), and they act in association
with cognitive processes (Tuncer & Avcı, 2018). In other words, this function refers to
conscious, cognitive control processes which are necessary for high-level mental function
and play roles in problem solving (Logue & Gould, 2014; Wong, Jacques, & Zelazo, 2008).
In other words, executive functions are the cognitive processes required to control
thoughts, behaviors and emotions. At the heart of complex executive functions that begin
to develop early in life and consist of planning and regulation concepts, there are three
basic executive function processes: working memory, impulse control and cognitive
flexibility (Diamond, 2013; Garon, Bryson, & Smith, 2008; Zelazo & Carlson, 2012).
Cognitive flexibility and abstraction are two processes that play an important role
especially in conceptual thinking and problem solving (Duncker & Lees, 1945; Gelman,
2006). This process allows individual to perform targeted actions and to respond
consciously to the individual's environment (Vandenbroucke, Verschueren, & Baeyens,
2017).
The flexibility involved in cognition is the ability to generate ideas and reactions
and to change them when necessary (Lezak, Howieson, Loring & Fischer, 2004). It is at
the heart of executive functions (Carlson, 2005). Cognitive flexibility also expresses the
abilities to switch between mind sets and to produce alternative strategies (Anderson,
2002). It includes the ability to simultaneously evaluate multiple aspects of the same
stimulus (Jacques, Zelazo, Lourenco & Sutherland, 2008). In other words, cognitive
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 239
flexibility is the condition of being aware that there may be alternative ways in the face
of an emerging event, a willingness to adapt to sudden situations, that is, to be flexible
(Martin & Anderson, 1998). Individuals who can see different alternatives in the face of
events are cognitively more flexible than those who do not. These individuals are not
only eager when trying new ways of communicating but also feel competent and safe in
demonstrating their behavior. Individuals with cognitive flexibility are confident in the
skills they possess and believe that the result of their acts will be successful (Küçüködük,
2015). However, it was mentioned that the most important thing in cognitive flexibility
is not to see the best, but to be able to see all possible options before making a choice
(Martin and Anderson, 1998; Bilgin, 2009).
Cognitive flexibility, which is the ability to adjust behavior appropriately in a
changing environment (Dajani et al., 2020), is also mentioned to be the third component
of executive functions (Diamond, 2013). This is because the cognitive flexibility includes
the ability to see events from many different perspectives, to adapt to the changing
demands, to find new ways to solve a problem, and to change the current thinking
(Tuncer, 2018). Cognitive flexibility also includes the ability to switch between mental
states, rule sets or tasks (Miyake et al., 2000). This executive function process prepares
individuals to easily adapt to the changes in their environment (Tuncer, 2018) because
the complexity of daily life brings with it the need to be cognitively flexible. In order to
adapt to a newly developing situation or to solve an emerging problem, one must be
aware of the options in the current situation and can apply different behavioral options
willingly, feeling self-sufficient in the process (Anderson, 1998). In other words, all these
require cognitive flexibility.
Preschool children can easily sort items in cognitive flexibility dimension by one
aspect (for example, sorting pictures by color or shape) (Best & Miller, 2010; Carlson, 2005;
Diamond, 2013). When the child is then given the instruction to change the sorting rule,
for example, from color to shape, i.e., when a new stimulus-response relationship is
enabled, the child is expected to follow the new rule by suppressing the previous one.
While recognizing the new rule and acting accordingly is possible in 4-year-olds, younger
children show a tendency to continue sorting by the earlier rule (Best & Miller, 2010).
However, the tasks of constantly switching between two different dimensions prove
much more difficult during adolescence (Brocki & Tillman, 2014; Davidson, Amso,
Anderson, & Diamond, 2006; Diamond, 2013). This is because the capacity to learn from
mistakes and to design alternative strategies develops in early childhood and grows in
middle childhood (Tuncer, 2018).
Abstraction, on the other hand, refers to the process by which the individual
properties of objects and the relationships between the objects are obliterated and
"experienced alone" (Werner, 1948). According to researchers who have cognitive
perspective, abstraction in general is a constant change associated with new experiences
such as noticing the similarities in one’s experiences (Kaplan & Elif, 2015). Thus, the
ability to abstract is a skill that allows finding the similarities between objects (Gentner &
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 240
Lowenstein, 2002), which is extremely important for generalization (Son, Smith, &
Goldstone, 2008).
Abstraction skill requires not hiding anything else, or at least distinguishing
information related to an action from others. Therefore, it is a representation of the extent
to which the important or useful information is stored while all others are discarded.
Abstraction thus allows information to be processed quickly and easily without being
disturbed by unrelated variables of other dimensions. Consequently, all abstractions
include selectively discarding some of the information presented (Hampton, 2003).
In early childhood, cognitive skills develop with age. Cognitive flexibility and the
ability to abstract are the process of adapting the thoughts and behaviors as a response
to suddenly evolving situations. The early childhood is the most effective period of
acquiring these skills (Geurts, Verté, Oosterlaan, Roeyers, & Sergeant, 2004).
Another point emphasized about executive functions is that its development
differs depending on age, experiences and many protective or restrictive factors (Cooper-
Kahn & Foster, 2013; Harris, 2016; Zelazo, 2015) because restrictive factors prevent the
child from having rich experiences by disrupting the development. Harmony is at the top
of these factors since one of the important aspects of the executive functions is the ability
to quickly adapt to changing situations. At the moment, there is a group of people in the
world that has to struggle to adapt to different environments in various countries by
encountering many difficulties due to the daily life changes of the new country. This
group is refugees and their children (Birman, 2002).
Refugee children try to continue their lives by leaving their own safe environment
for various reasons and going to a new society, i.e., a different environment. Although
the schools offer these children a stable and safe environment, refugee children have to
make an additional effort to adapt to the environment for different reasons such as the
difficult migration processes that they go through, different cultural characteristics and
language (Hart, 2009). These children should be provided with the same opportunities as
the other children through identifying their daily life needs and supporting their
cognitive processes, and arrangements should be made regarding their learning
environments caring for their physical, psychological and cognitive well-being in reliable
environments which are appropriate for their individual condition and cognitive
competence (Kirk & Cassity, 2007). This is because such a planned arrangement would
take them to more advanced levels by creating an infrastructure for their academic
achievements and accelerating their ability to adapt to life. Indeed, current studies show
that executive function skills develop in infancy and early childhood and creates the
infrastructure for the development of more complex skills such as abstract thinking and
complex problem solving (Best & Miller, 2010; Dilworth-Bart, 2012). Another study found
that there is a relationship between complex executive functions and academic
achievement in children between the ages of 5 and 17, and that this relationship changes
with age (Best, Miller, & Naglieri, 2011). Similarly, executive functions were reported to
develop rapidly, especially between the ages of 6 and 12 (Brocki & Bohlin, 2004; Jacobsen,
de Mello, Kochhann, & Fonseca, 2017; Romine & Reynolds, 2005). In addition, it was also
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 241
mentioned that the development in early childhood is a process related to the maturation
and life experiences of the brain, has positive effects on children's early learning skills
including language, thinking and math skills, develops in direct proportion to age, but
should be addressed as a whole to improve the mentioned executive functions of children
(Cooper-Kahn & Foster, 2013; Harris, 2016; Zelazo, 2015).
In the present study, abstraction and cognitive flexibility, important components
of executive functions, of Turkish and refugee children attending kindergarten and
nursery school between the ages of 4 and 6 were evaluated using Flexible Item Selection
Task (FIST). For this purpose, the following questions were examined;
• Are there differences among different preschool children for abstraction and
cognitive flexibility scores?
• Are there differences between genders among Turkish children attending
kindergarten for abstraction and cognitive flexibility scores?
• Are there differences between genders among Turkish children attending nursery
school for abstraction and cognitive flexibility scores?
• Are there differences between genders among refugee children attending nursery
school for abstraction and cognitive flexibility scores?
• Are there differences between the two age groups of Turkish children attending
kindergarten for abstraction and cognitive flexibility scores?
• Are there differences between the two age groups of Turkish children attending
nursery school for abstraction and cognitive flexibility scores?
• Are there differences between the two age groups of refugee children attending
nursery school for abstraction and cognitive flexibility scores?
3. Method
3.1. Model of the Research
In this study, the executive functions of Turkish and refugee children between the ages
of 4 and 6 were compared. For this purpose, abstraction and cognitive flexibility, which
are important components of the executive functions, were evaluated in Turkish and
refugee children. The study was a survey type quantitative research. According to
Karasar (2009, p.77), a survey model is a research approach that reflects an existing
condition as it is. In addition, the research aimed to compare abstraction and cognitive
flexibility of children in three sections, i.e., Turkish children in kindergarten, Turkish
children in nursery school and refugee children in nursery school, based on gender and
age variables. In this respect, the research was a cross-sectional type survey model. This
type of research is conducted by taking sections at one time in accordance with the
characteristics of the variables to be explained (Fraenkel, Wallen & Hyun, 2011).
3.2. The Study Groups
The participants of the study were children attending two nursery school and a
kindergarten in a central town of a province in Turkey. The schools where 48-60-month-
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 242
old children are educated are called kindergarten in Turkey. On the other hand, the
schools for 61-72-month-olds are called nursery schools. The present study included one
kindergarten and two nursery schools. These are schools located in the city center, long
distances from each other and in different neighborhoods. The Turkish children in the
study were both kindergarten and nursery school children. On the other hand, refugee
children were only nursery school children who attended to the nursery school together
with Turkish children. The study included a total of 99 preschool children in the study.
They were 32 (32.3%) Turkish children attending kindergarten, 36 (36.4%) Turkish
children attending nursery school and 31 (31.3%) refugee children attending nursery
school. Gender and age distributions of the students are given in Table 1.
Table 1: Frequency and Percentage Distributions of
Turkish and Refugee Children by Gender and Age Levels
Turkish children
attending
kindergarten
Turkish children
attending nursery
school
Refugee children
attending nursery
school
Categories F % F % F %
Gender Boys 16 50.0 17 47.2 16 51.6
Girls 16 50.0 19 52.8 15 48.4
Age 48-60 months 15 46.9 16 44.4 16 51.6
61-72 months 17 53.1 20 55.6 15 48.4
Total 32 32.3 36 36.4 31 31.3
3.3. Data Collection Tool
3.3.1. Personal Information Form
The form created for children included questions to obtain information about age, gender
and the name of the school and the name of the class. In addition, there was a section in
this form to be filled by the researcher about duration of the time to fill the scale and the
date on which the survey was carried out.
3.3.2. Flexible Item Selection Task (FIST)
Flexible Item Selection Task (FIST) applied to children as a data collection tool consists of
abstraction and cognitive flexibility components, and 30 items. It has been developed by
Sophie Jacques and Philip David Zelazo (2001) in 2001 and Turkish adaptation study of
this scale was performed by Şahin (2015). Permission was first granted from Sophie
Jaques via e-mail to use the scale. Then, permission was asked and taken from Gulhan
Şahin, who performed the Turkish adaptation study of the scale. In the implementation
of Flexible Item Selection Task (FIST), the first choice evaluates the child's abstraction of
the common properties of objects, and the second choice evaluates the ability to switch
flexibly between related dimensions through abstraction. In total, maximum scores of 15
points could be obtained for each of abstraction and cognitive flexibility.
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 243
3.4. Scale Implementation Procedures for Children
In the process of implementing the scale for children, specific procedures have been
established which are different from those of adults. Presence of written implementation
procedures minimizes ethical violations when working with children and ensures that
the scale is applied to each child in the same way by everyone (Einarsdóttir, 2007).
First, the research proposal was submitted to the ethics committee and the
necessary permission was obtained indicating there was no ethical concern. Then, a
written application was made to the Provincial Directorate of National Education for
permitting the research to be conducted in the designated schools.
During this application, written copies of the scale were sent to the Provincial
Directorate of National Education and to families through administrators and teachers of
the schools along with a note containing information about the purpose of the research,
what procedures would be applied in the research, information about the scale to be
applied and a sample of scale items and a family consent form. The families were asked
to sign the consent form. The scale was applied only to the children whose families
allowed the scale to be used.
3.4.1. Organizing the Environment for the Implementation of The Scale
In each school where the scale would be implemented, the school administration was
asked to allocate a place that had a desk and two chairs for the child and the researcher
who would apply the scale. Care was taken that there were no items in this room that
could distract the child. It was also made sure that the room was noise-free and did not
contain elements that pose a safety risk to the child.
The researcher who would apply the scale first began by aligning with the child
and making eye contact, telling the child her name and introducing herself. She then
explained to the boy what to do, saying, "Hi, my name is Nuran. I am here to visit your
school today. I want to play a game with you. This game will last no more than 15 minutes
and I will show you some pictures and I want to talk to you about these pictures. Do you
want to talk with me and play this game?" After this proposal, when the child responded
positively, they went to the room and the scale was started. In case of a negative response,
she told the boy "It was so nice to meet you. Thank you" and the child was allowed to go
back to the class.
The researcher, who sat around the desk in a position across the child who agreed
to participate, first put a sticker on her index finger and on child's index finger which
would be used during the application, and asked the child to indicate the answers for the
questions asked with his/her finger with the sticker. The implementation of the scale took
about 8-10 minutes.
At the end of the implementation of the Flexible Item Selection Task (FIST) scale,
the researcher told the child that the game was over and gave the sticker as a gift and
accompanied the child to his/her class.
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 244
3.5. Analysis of Data
Data collected from children aged 4-6 years were evaluated using the SPSS-24 software.
The distribution of the data obtained by Flexible Item Selection Task scale was examined
and it was found that there was no data with outlier problem. In addition, during the
examination of the outliers of variables, the stem-and-leaf-plot and boxplots were
examined and the very high and very low values were interpreted as outliers (Tan, 2016,
p.100). In the context of stem-and-leaf-plot and boxplots, there was no data with outliers.
The skewness and kurtosis values were examined for each group of children in the study
and are shown in Table 2. Skewness and kurtosis values were used for the evaluation of
the normality of the score distributions of children regarding the components of the scale.
The skewness and kurtosis values examined for testing the assumption of normality
varied between -1 and +1 (Table 2). It was mentioned that the skewness and kurtosis
coefficients in the range of -1 to +1 could be regarded as an indication of normality
(Morgan, Leech, Gloeckner & Barrett, 2004, p.50). When the homogeneity of the test
variances, i.e., the distribution of Levene’s homogeneity test, was examined, it was found
that the test variances of the score distribution were homogeneous at p >.05 level based
on Levene’s statistics, i.e., the homogeneity assumption was met. It was observed that the
score distribution for the components of the scale was continuous and at interval scale
level. The independence of the two samples (groups), dependent variable measurements
at range or ratio scale level and meeting the normality and homogeneity assumptions
fulfilled the parametric test assumptions (Köklü, Büyüköztürk & Bökeoğlu, 2007, p.152-
161).
Table 2: Skewness and Kurtosis Values Related
to the Normality of Children's Scores in the components of the Scale
N=99
Turkish children
attending
kindergarten
Turkish children
attending nursery
school
Refugee children
attending nursery
school
Scale Component Skewness Kurtosis Skewness Kurtosis Skewness Kurtosis
Flexible Item
Selection Task
Abstraction -.613 -.502 -.945 -.165 -.585 -.960
Cognitive
flexibility -.080 -.971 -.369 -.463 -.988 -.317
Since the skewness and kurtosis values ranged from +1 to -1, normality was confirmed,
and variance was homogeneous based on Levene’s statistics (Levene’s Statistics for
abstraction: 1.349, p = .264 > .05; and Levene’s Statistics for Cognitive Flexibility: 1.297, p
= .278 > .05). Upon revealing that the data met the parametric test assumptions,
independent samples t-test was used to determine whether there was a difference
between the gender and age subgroups of children for abstraction scores and cognitive
flexibility scores since there were two levels in each of these subgroups. Since the children
group, on the other hand, had more than two categories, the differences between the
student groups for abstraction scores and cognitive flexibility scores were evaluated
using One-Way ANOVA (One-Way Analysis of Variance). Tukey test was used for
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 245
multiple comparisons as a Post Hoc test in one-way analysis of variance to compare the
groups with more than two levels when the difference was significant for a variable (Can,
2014, p.152).
4. Findings and Comments
First Subproblem: Are there differences among the children groups for abstraction scores
and cognitive flexibility scores?
Table 3: One-Way ANOVA Results for Abstraction Scores and
Cognitive Flexibility Scores of the Three Preschool Children Groups
Group N X S F(2-96) p Post Hoc
(Tukey HSD)
Abstraction
Turkish children
attending kindergarten 32 12.81 2.13
0.36 .701
Turkish children
attending nursery
school
36 13.08 1.98
Refugee children
attending nursery
school
31 12.65 2.36
Cognitive
flexibility
Turkish children
attending kindergarten 32 8.47 3.89
12.68 .000* 1>3, 2>3
Turkish children
attending nursery
school
36 8.50 3.49
Refugee children
attending nursery
school
31 4.16 4.52
*p<.05 Categories: Turkish children attending kindergarten = 1; Turkish children attending nursery school
= 2; Refugee children attending nursery school = 3
The differences among the three preschool children groups for abstraction scores and
cognitive flexibility scores were tested. No significant difference was found among the
three preschool children group for the abstraction component of the Flexible Item
Selection Task scale [F(2-96) = 0.36, p = .701 > .05]. Although the average abstraction score
of Turkish children attending nursery school were higher than that of Turkish children
attending kindergartens, the difference was not significant. It was found that the skill
levels of children in all groups related to the finding similarities between the objects were
similar to each other.
A significant difference was found among the three preschool children group for
the cognitive flexibility component of the Flexible Item Selection Task scale [F(2-96) = 12.68,
p = .000, < .05]. This significant difference was due to the fact that the average cognitive
flexibility scores of Turkish children attending kindergarten X = 8.47) and the average
cognitive flexibility scores of Turkish children attending nursery school ( X = 8.50) were
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 246
higher than that of the refugee children attending nursery school ( X = 4.16). The finding
that that Turkish children attending preschool were aware of alternative ways meant that
they were confident to adapt to the situations and to be flexible compared to refugee
children.
Second Subproblem: Is there a gender difference for abstraction scores and cognitive
flexibility scores between the Turkish boys and girls attending kindergarten?
Table 4: Independent Samples t-test for the Difference between Turkish Boys and Girls
Attending Kindergarten for Their Abstraction Scores and Cognitive Flexibility Scores
Gender N X S t SD p
Abstraction Boy 16 13.25 2.29
1.17 30 .252 Girl 16 12.38 1.93
Cognitive Flexibility Boy 16 10.13 3.40
2.63 30 .013* Girl 16 6.81 3.71
p < .05
Turkish boys and girls attending kindergarten were compared for their abstraction scores
and cognitive flexibility scores (Table 4). No significant difference was found between the
two genders for the abstraction component of Flexible Item Selection Task scale (t(30) =
1.17, p = .252 > .05). However, there was a significant difference between the genders for
cognitive flexibility component of Flexible Item Selection Task (t(30) = 2.63, p = .013 < .05).
This significant difference was due to the higher average cognitive flexibility scores of
Turkish boys attending kindergarten ( X = 10.13) compared to that of Turkish girls ( X =
6.81).
Third Subproblem: Is there a gender difference within Turkish children attending
nursery school for abstraction scores and cognitive flexibility scores?
Table 5: Independent-Samples t-test for the Difference between Turkish Boys and Girls
Attending Nursery School for Their Abstraction Scores and Cognitive Flexibility Scores
Gender N X S t SD p
Abstraction Boy 17 13.35 1.90
0.77 34 .447 Girl 19 12.84 2.06
Cognitive Flexibility Boy 17 8.77 3.19
0.43 30 .673 Girl 19 8.26 3.80
*p < .05
Turkish boys and girls attending nursery school were compared for their abstraction
scores and cognitive flexibility scores (Table 5). No significant difference was found
between the two genders for the abstraction component of Flexible Item Selection Task
scale (t(34) = 0.77, p = .447 > .05). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the
two genders for cognitive flexibility component of Flexible Item Selection Task (t(34) = 0.43,
p = .673 > .05).
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 247
Fourth Subproblem: Is there a difference between the two genders in refugee children
attending nursery school for abstraction scores and cognitive flexibility scores?
Table 6: Independent-Samples t-test for the Difference between Refugee Boys and Girls
Attending Nursery School for Their Abstraction Scores and Cognitive Flexibility Scores
Gender N X S t SD p
Abstraction Boy 16 12.38 2.31
0.65 29 .520 Girl 15 12.93 2.46
Cognitive Flexibility Boy 16 2.38 3.14
2.45 29 .020* Girl 15 6.07 5.08
*p < .05
Refugee boys and girls attending nursery school were compared for their abstraction
scores and cognitive flexibility scores (Table 6). No significant difference was found
between the two genders for the abstraction component of Flexible Item Selection Task
scale (t(29) = 0.65, p = .520 > .05). However, there was a significant difference between the
two genders for cognitive flexibility component of Flexible Item Selection Task (t(29) = 2.45,
p = .020 > .05). This significant difference was due to the higher average cognitive
flexibility scores of refugee girls ( X = 6.07) compared to that of refugee boys ( X = 2.38).
Fifth Subproblem: Is there a difference between the two age groups of Turkish children
attending kindergarten for their abstraction scores and cognitive flexibility scores?
Table 7: Independent-Samples t-test for the Difference between the Two Age Groups of Turkish
Children Attending Kindergarten for Their Abstraction Scores and Cognitive Flexibility Scores
Age N X S t SD p
Abstraction 48-60 months 15 12.27 2.09
1.30 30 .178 61-72 months 17 13.29 2.11
Cognitive Flexibility 48-60 months 15 7.00 3.02
2.12 30 .043* 61-72 months 17 9.77 4.18
*p < .05
Two age groups of Turkish children attending kindergarten were compared for their
abstraction scores and cognitive flexibility scores (Table 7). No significant difference was
found between the two age groups for the abstraction component of Flexible Item
Selection Task scale (t(30) = 1.30, p = .178 > .05). However, there was a significant difference
between the two age groups for cognitive flexibility component of Flexible Item Selection
Task (t(30) = 2.12, p = .043 < .05). This significant difference was due to the higher average
cognitive flexibility scores of 61-72 months old Turkish children attending kindergarten
( X = 9.77) compared to that of 48-60-month-olds ( X = 7.00).
Sixth Subproblem: Is there a difference between the two age groups of Turkish children
attending nursery school for abstraction scores and cognitive flexibility scores?
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 248
Table 8: Independent-Samples t-test for the Difference between
the Two Age Groups of Turkish Children Attending Nursery
School for Their Abstraction Scores and Cognitive Flexibility Scores
Age N X S t SD p
Abstraction 48-60 months 16 12.56 1.97
1.44 34 .160 61-72 months 20 13.50 1.93
Cognitive Flexibility 48-60 months 16 8.31 3.32
0.29 34 .777 61-72 months 20 8.65 3.69
*p < .05
Two age groups of Turkish children attending nursery school were compared for their
abstraction scores and cognitive flexibility scores (Table 8). No significant difference was
found between the two age groups for the abstraction component of Flexible Item
Selection Task scale (t(34) = 1.44, p = .160 > .05). Similarly, the difference between the two
age groups were not different for cognitive flexibility component of Flexible Item
Selection Task (t(34) = 0.29, p = .777 > .05).
Seventh Subproblem: Is there a difference between the two age groups of refugee
children attending nursery school for abstraction scores and cognitive flexibility scores?
Table 9: Independent Samples t-test for the Difference between
the Two Age Groups of Refugee Children Attending Nursery
School for Their Abstraction Scores and Cognitive Flexibility Scores
Age N X S t SD p
Abstraction 48-60 months 16 12.25 2.15
0.96 29 .344 61-72 months 15 13.07 2.58
Cognitive Flexibility 48-60 months 16 2.63 3.32
2.06 29 .049* 61-72 months 15 5.80 5.14
*p < .05
Two age groups of refugee children attending nursery school were compared for their
abstraction scores and cognitive flexibility scores (Table 9). No significant difference was
found between the two age groups for the abstraction component of Flexible Item
Selection Task scale (t(29) = 0.96, p = .344 > .05). However, the difference between the two
age groups was significant for cognitive flexibility component of Flexible Item Selection
Task (t(29) = 2.06, p = .049 < .05). This significant difference was due to the higher average
cognitive flexibility scores of 61-72 months old refugee children attending nursery school
( X = 5.80) compared to that of 48-60-month-olds ( X = 2.63).
5. Results and Discussion
One of the most important results of the present study was the significant difference
among the preschool student groups for the scores of cognitive flexibility component of
Flexible Item Selection Task scale [F(2-96) =12.68, p = .000 < .05]. This significant difference
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 249
was due to the fact that the cognitive flexibility scores ( X = 8.47) of Turkish children
attending kindergarten and the cognitive flexibility scores of Turkish children attending
nursery school ( X = 8.50) were higher than the cognitive flexibility scores of refugee
children attending nursery school ( X = 4.16). In other words, the cognitive flexibility of
Turkish children attending to preschools was better than that of refugee children.
Cognitively flexible people are considered to be the individuals with unique strategies
who may be aware of their potential and can combat the problems they experience in
difficult situations (Tutuş, 2019).
Compared to other groups in society, refugees have less chance to carry out their
future plans due to social uncertainty, socioeconomic difficulties and traumatized events
(Hodes, 2000). Therefore, they need more support in the process of gaining the skills and
qualifications necessary for a sustainable life in the society in which they live (Şeker &
Aslan, 2015). This is because the effect of chaos in the place where they come from
increases their level of anxiety and stress. Chaos has both direct and indirect effects on
the cognitive development of the children. Refugee children themselves may also
experience post-chaos trauma and stress disorder caused by past experiences. Some
studies found that as in adults stress disorder, depression and anxiety are common in
refugee children (Hart, 2009; Dalhouse and Dalhouse, 2009; Roxas, 2011).
Excessive stimulation of the direct, chaotic environment can lead to distraction,
obstructions and a retreat from stimulation, since the attention capacity of young children
is not developed enough to detect and ignore unnecessary information (Evans, 2006;
Vernon-Feagans, Willoughby and Garrett-Peters, 2016). It is expected that refugee
children have low cognitive flexibility due to the conditions they live in because the
cognitive flexibility also includes the ability to adapt easily to new situations. However,
different studies also showed that refugee children have difficulty with adapting to the
school environment and have a wide range of adaptation problems (Emin, 2019; Kaya,
2019; Sallan, Turkmen & Kayhan, 2019; Sezgin, 2019; Moralı, 2018; Kirova, 2010; Suarez-
Orozco, 2000). They also have problems with adapting to the life in the country they live
in (Suarez-Orozco, 2000), which inevitably impair their cognitive flexibility skills.
Refugee children are often considered as multiple disadvantaged groups because they
experience a mixture of many traumatic events. Negative experiences affect children's
physical, social, emotional and cognitive processes (Şeker & Aslan, 2015). However, the
individual wishes and needs of these children are universal needs, similar to those of
other children (Pinson & Arnot, 2007). Meeting these needs is unfortunately limited to
the opportunities that compulsory migration could provide them. There have been many
recent studies in the literature dealing with the situation of refugee children in Turkey
(Emin, 2019; Kaya, 2019; Sallan, Turkmen & Kayhan, 2019; Sezgin, 2019; Moralı, 2018;
Kardeş & Akman, 2018; Korkut, 2018; Akpınar, 2017; Gümüşten, 2017; Sağlam, 2017;
Tüzün, 2017; Kağnıcı, 2017; Uzun & Bütün, 2016; Yavuz & Mızrak, 2016; Şeker, 2015).
These studies involve the refugee children’s right and adaptation to education (Emin,
2019; Kaya, 2019; Kardeş & Akman, 2018; Tüzün, 2017; Gümüşten, 2017; Yavuz & Mızrak,
2016; Sugar, 2015), the situation of working children (Sallan, Turkmen & Kayhan, 2019),
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 250
cultural harmony and language (Kağnıcı, 2017; Uzun & Bütün, 2016), various problems
experienced by children (Akpınar, 2017; Moralı, 2018; Korkut, 2018), the problems they
face in school and the attitude of teachers (Yavuz & Mızrak, 2016; Uzun & Bütün, 2016;
Sağlam, 2017) and their expectations (Korkut, 2018). In addition, there are studies in
which refugee children were compared in terms of various variables. For example, in a
master's thesis in which Coşgun (2019) compared refugee and Turkish children, it was
found that the cognitive flexibility levels of Turkish children were better than those of
refugee children. Refugee children face a wide range of challenges that could significantly
affect their development all over the world. In a recent study with 448 children between
the ages of 5 and 12, in which children's cognitive, sensory and behavioral processes were
examined to understand the development of refugee children in Lebanon, it was found
that the working memory and obstructive control scores, steps of executive functions,
were lower in refugee children compared to other children in the class, even though the
refuge children were older than their classmates (Kim, Brown, Dolan, Sheridan & Aber,
2020). The findings of the present study were in accordance with the findings from the
abovementioned studies.
The cognitive flexibility process refers to the ability to deal with a problem using
a different perspective from what is available, and requires taking advantage of a
perspective which is flexible enough to adjust changing demands or priorities (Diamond,
2012). In other words, adapting to a new situation is closely related to the level of
cognitive flexibility. However, the number of refugee children with cognitive problems
is increasing every year (Fazel, Wheeler & Danesh, 2005). Here, the critical importance of
the school comes to the fore.
Gümüşten (2017) studied intervention programs for the education and adaptation
of refugee children and mentioned that refugee children need teachers' support in schools
to be able to deal with negative experiences and actively use their cognitive processes. It
was concluded that if various interaction-based practices could be made by organizing
sessions on emotion recognition, emotion regulation, empathy, friendship, self-respect,
cultural harmony and environmental recognition, there would be a significant increase
in both social and cognitive skills of these children.
It should be kept in mind during the educational process that refugee children are
vulnerable groups experiencing health problems, anxiety, insecurity, focusing problems,
depression, post-traumatic stress disorder due to the impact of the migration process.
Indeed, migration processes affect children most. Due to their sensitive situations,
teachers and school employees need to pay more attention to and care for refugee
students. The struggles of individuals can continue only if they have hopes for the future
(Bennet, 2007; Oikonomidoy, 2010). If these children are given more attention, care and
support to improve their ability to deal with challenges and to adapt more easily, there
will also be a significant change in their cognitive flexibility levels. One of factors that
affects this change is language. Many studies revealed a strong relationship between
language learning and adaptation, and a mutual relationship between learning a second
language and social skills (Candappa & Egharevba, 2000; Marriott, 2001; Stanley, 2001;
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 251
Loewen, 2004). Mercan Uzun & Bütün (2016) studied the case of Syrians in Samsun
province of Turkey and found that children could not socialize and had serious problems
since they did not have enough level of Turkish. Wagner (2013) found that supporting
families and children for language acquisition and giving them a culture-based education
are the most basic needs of refugees. In addition, in Korkut's (2018) study, preschool
teachers stated that the primary problem they experienced with refugee children was
language, and that the parents of Turkish children objected to education of their children
in the same class as refugee children who do not speak Turkish. The language problem
in refugees and the challenges it brings have been the subject of much research (Aydın &
Kaya, 2017; Ceyhan & Kocabaş, 2011; Oikonomidoy, 2010). In their study with teachers,
Kardeş & Akman (2018) also found that the most common problems experienced by
refugee children were problems related to language, school adaptation and self-
expression. But in general, people need at least five years in the host country to fully learn
the local language (Cummins, 1980). All these problems negatively affect the cognitive
processes of these children. However, it is thought that if this discriminatory viewpoint
among people can be eliminated and refugee children are safely educated with their peers
in the school environment at an early age, their cognitive processes will change positively
since their adaptation process will be faster. The first institution where children meet the
school is preschool education. The way to facilitate the adaptation of these children is
through preschool education. The first thing that attracts attention here is the teacher.
Beyond volunteering to work with refugee children, the preschool teacher should act
without forgetting the fact that he/she has a working group described as sensitive and
fragile (Güven, Azkeskin, Yilmaz, 2018) and prepare the curriculum with the principles
of flexibility and maximum usefulness in a way to maximize the benefits that these
children can derive from it. Use of a teaching method by preschool teacher with variety
and intensity level that these children can handle will facilitate their adaptation (Günek,
2020). This will in turn allow them to think deeply about a problem, change perspective,
look from different perspectives, adapt to the environment and switch between mental
schemes (Diamond, 2012; Garon, Bryson & Smith, 2008), thereby improving their skills
and cognitive processes rapidly. The preschool teacher's point of view is important.
However, despite Turkey's long and rich history of hosting asylum seekers, teachers'
ability to work with asylum seekers is an important topic of discussion (Alpaydin, 2017).
It was emphasized in various studies that teachers were not competent in working with
refugees, asylum seekers, traumatized children and children with different educational
backgrounds, different languages and cultures, and that their knowledge about asylum
and refugee issues was limited and they needed vocational training in these subjects
(Bourgonje, 2010; Beltekin, 2016; Kovinthan, 2016; Dryden-Peterson, 2015; Ferfolja, 2009;
Matthews, 2008; Sidhu & Taylor, 2009; Pastoor, 2015). Supporting refugee children in
terms of executive function skills and providing them with quality education is closely
related to the development of teachers' ability to teaching in multicultural and
multilingual classrooms (Bourgonje, 2010). Preschool teachers in particular may need
support in this regard because they are better at improving their executive function skills
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 252
and interventions work best in preschool years (Benson, Sabbagh, Carlson & Zelazo,
2013; Kaufman, 2010; Vitiello & Greenfield, 2017; Welsh, Nix, Blair, Bierman & Nelson,
2010; Zelazo et al., 2004). There are studies in the literature mentioning that preschool
teachers have critical roles in improving children's executive function skills (Harris, 2016;
Isquith, Gioia & Espy, 2004; Jacques & Zelazo, 2001). All these studies reported that the
way of communication teachers use towards the children has a crucial impact on the
executive functions.
Another result of the present study was that there was no significant difference
between the genders for the abstraction scores among Turkish children attending
kindergarten and nursery school and refugee children attending nursery school. In
contrast, while there was a significant difference in favor of boys for the cognitive
flexibility scores of Turkish children attending kindergarten, a significant difference was
found in favor of girls for the cognitive flexibility scores among refugee children
attending nursery school. There are studies in the literature with conflicting findings on
this subject. In a study examining the relationship between the number perception and
cognitive flexibility levels of children aged 5-6 years by Gökdag (2020), there was no
significant difference in the levels of cognitive flexibility between boys and girls.
Similarly, no significant difference was found between the genders for cognitive
flexibility in sixth, seventh and eighth graders (Tutuş 2019), in adolescents (Bilgiç & Bilgin
2016), in individuals between the ages of 14 and 18 (Ozcan 2016), in college students
(Zong et al. 2011) and in the study by Martin & Rubin (1995). However, there are also
studies in the literature reporting that cognitive flexibility levels of boys were better than
those of boys (Koç, 2020; Asıcı &İkiz, 2015; Altunkol, 2011), and vice versa (Kömür; 2018;
Gürbüz, 2017).
The complexity of everyday life brings with it the need to be cognitively flexible
(Martin et al. 1998). Adapting to a new situation or solving a problem requires the person
to be aware of different behavioral options in the face of the current situation, to be able
to apply these different behavioral options willingly and to feel sufficient in this regard,
i.e., cognitive flexibility. This is because cognitive flexibility directly supports the ability
of the individual to communicate (Martin, Anderson & Thweatt, 1998), to deal with new
and difficult situations (Altunkol, 2011), to solve problems (Stevens, 2009), to tolerate the
disagreements (Martin, Anderson & Thewatt, 1998), to generate alternative thoughts and
ideas (Altunkol, 2011), to be more positive in interpersonal relations (Hill, 2008), and
promotes conscious awareness (Moore & Malinowski, 2009) and self-sufficiency (Martin
& Anderson, 1998). Accordingly, the better adaptation ability to new situations in Turkish
boys could be due to the higher expectations for men as a result of the patriarchal
structure of Turkish culture. Indeed, in some cultures, girls are more protected while boys
are given more freedom and allowed to socialize outside the house (Balaguru, 2004).
Şafak et al. (2006) found that boys spend more time on activities such as garden care,
installment/bill payment and cinema-theater ticket buying than girls do. All these may
have had a positive impact on boys' cognitive flexibility skills, i.e., their ability to adapt
to new situations. In contrast, girls had higher cognitive flexibility levels than boys among
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 253
refugee children. In interviews with the teachers of these children, it was found out that
girls' attendance to school was better than that of boys. The children stated that boys often
played on the street or went to work with their fathers instead of coming to school, so
they little attended school while girls came to school more regularly and attended school
for two years in a row. This could be one reason why the level of cognitive flexibility was
better in girls.
There was no difference for the abstraction scores between the preschool Turkish
children and refugee children. However, the differences between the two age groups in
Turkish children attending kindergarten and refugee children attending nursery school
for cognitive flexibility scores were significant. Turkish children attending kindergarten
who were 61-72 months old ( X = 9.77) had higher cognitive flexibility scores than 48-60-
month-olds ( X = 7.00). Likewise, refugee children attending nursery school who were
61-72 months old ( X = 5.80) had higher cognitive flexibility scores than 48-60-month-
olds ( X = 2.63).
Cognitive flexibility, which refers to situations in which young children can
succeed in actions with changing rules, begins to develop at the first two or three years
of early childhood. Although executive function skills continue to mature through
various stages of development from infancy to adulthood, many critical developments
occur in early childhood with a course of development directly proportional to age
(Buttelmann & Karbach, 2017; Cartwright, 2012). Jacques & Zelazo (2001) conducted a
study on children between the ages of 2 and 5 using Flexible Item Selection Task test, and
reported that since instructions for tasks began to be understood from the age of 3, three-
year age group performed significantly lower than the four- and five-year age groups.
They also reported that cognitive flexibility skills developed mainly at the age of 5.
Likewise, many studies conducted for Flexible Item Selection Task and similar cognitive
flexibility tasks found that cognitive flexibility develops in a way that is directly
proportional to age and that while 5-6-year-olds have better performance than 3-4-year-
olds (Ahçı, 2016; Blaye & Chevalier, 2011; Bennett & Müller, 2010; Smidts, Jacobs &
Anderson, 2004; Blaye & Jacques, 2009; Espy, 1997). Thus, our findings were in parallel
with these studies in literature.
It is important to understand the development of executive functions, as they often
play a vital role in transforming a child who "acts without thinking" into a mature,
responsible adult who can plan and control their behavior (Cragg & Nation, 2007). For
this, the children must be taught by teachers who accept them as they are, who are
compassionate and understanding, and who enrich educational environment with
activities that support executive function skills of children. Indeed, Rutter (2006)
emphasized that being accepted by a teacher in a new school, being understood, being
happy, making friends and being successful in school make these children feel optimistic
about the future and progress, which is an important factor that will allow refugee
children to be cognitively strong. The author stated that children, especially the children
who have the ease of reaching other people, who can make friends and have support
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 254
from their communities, are more resilient and stronger in adapting to school and
environment and dealing with difficulties. Therefore, teachers are the ones who will
support these children's executive function skills and carry out activities that will bring
them to the same level as their peers. In this sense, teachers' perspectives on multicultural
education are also important. Turkey's multicultural structure, which is becoming more
widespread with its own cultural diversity and phenomena such as migration, etc., make
this even more important (Bozkurt, Kıran and Alıcı, 2020). Bulut and Sarıçam (2016)
found that attitudes of preschool teachers and teacher candidates towards multicultural
education were predicted by the multicultural personality variable, which includes
cultural empathy, flexibility, social assertiveness, open-mindedness and emotional
balance dimensions.
In their study with teacher candidates, Bozkurt, Kıran and Alıcı (2020), on the
other hand, found that as the social distance levels of teachers to the refugees decreased,
their positive attitudes towards multicultural education increased. The study also found
that cognitive flexibility promoted positive attitude by teacher candidates to
multiculturality. The impact of cognitive flexibility on the perspective of life could be
found in many areas. In the study, it was especially emphasized that cognitive flexibility
of teachers is important. It is clear that teachers with cognitive flexibility are key to
organizing more inclusive educational environments (Bozkurt, Kıran and Alıcı, 2020). All
these point to the importance of the teacher's point of view. Teachers are the ones who
will give the crucial important support to this group affected by war in early childhood.
Besides, the greatest support in terms of establishing a universal perspective in education
is again expected of them. When teachers act from this point of view, they will
understand the vital importance of executive function skills for asylum-seeker children,
and will investigate and strive to learn strategies that will make it easier for them to
support this vulnerable group. This will help teachers to focus on strong and perceptive
potential of children and to rebuild their understanding towards them rather than seeing
them as "unmotivated," "lazy", "not studying hard enough" or “discordant” (Tuncer,
2018). With such an understanding, these children will be able to continue their
educational lives without being left back from their peers in an educational environment
where they feel good because they are understood.
6. Suggestions
Preschool teachers dealing with refugee children can be assisted by teachers who master
the language of refugee children. Besides, these children could be supported by visual or
audio materials which will provide common meanings between children and teachers in
order to create a more qualified communication language and to minimize
communication problems within the classroom.
• Work of teachers could be facilitated by preparing a special education program for
the refugee children, which can be added to the preschool education program.
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 255
• With projects prepared under the leadership of universities, municipalities
various foundations and associations, process of learning Turkish language by
refugee children can be accelerated by organizing social events and play-based
activities that will ensure the participation of Turkish children, volunteer
instructors and volunteer mothers.
• In order for these children to be cognitively strong and resilient, teachers can be
provided with various educational programs for implementing individualized
educational programs for children's needs.
• The most important way to improve the cognitive processes of refugee children is
to think them together with their parents. Family education seminars with
continuity can be organized for refugee parents. In these seminars, the importance
of preschool education can be explained through a teacher in their language and
parents can be made aware of the importance of boys' school attendance.
• Preschool teachers and parents of refugee children can be given in-service training
on how to implement strategies that support executive function skills.
• In preschool education institutions or public education centers, materials that
improve and support children's executive function skills can be prepared with
parents.
• “Peer mediation and peer counseling” trainings can be organized and
implemented in schools to provide support from classmates for refugee children.
• In order to accept differences as a wealth in the schools where refugee students
are educated and to create a peace culture, long-term programs about tolerance,
healthy communication, human rights, multicultural education and prevention of
prejudice can be prepared and implemented. These programs can be carried out
within the scope of social responsibility projects of college students.
About the Author(s)
Dr. Nuran Tuncer is an Assistant Professor at Department of Elementary Education at
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, she got her doctoral degree from Gazi University
University, Institute of Educational Sciences in 2018. Her doctoral dissertation titled “An
analysis of the effectiveness of the teacher training program regarding supporting
preschool children’ executive functions”. Her research areas are Early Childhood
Education, Pre-School Education, Executive functions, Early learning skills, Classroom
strategies, Disadvantaged children, Preschool teachers, Teacher candidates, Parent
education, Children’ literature.
References
Ahçı, Z. G. (2016). 3-5 year olds’ executive function performances and its relationship
with language abilities. 1. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 5(2), 84.
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 256
Akpınar, T. (2017). The problems of Syrian refugee children and women in turkey in the
context of social policy. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 3(03),
16-29.
Alpaydın, Y. (2017). An analysis of educational policies for school-aged Syrian refugees
in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(9), 36-44.
Altunkol, F. (2011). The effects of a cognitive flexibility education program on high school
students' cognitive flexibility, perceived stress levels and coping styles.
(Unpublished Ph.D. thesis), Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü,
Adana.
Anderson, C. M. (1998). Aggressive communication traits and their relationships with the
cognitive flexibility scale and the communication flexibility scale. Journal of Social
Behavior and Personality, 13(3), 531-540.
Asıcı, E., İkiz, F. E. (2015) A pathway to happiness: Cognitive flexibility. Mehmet Akif Ersoy
Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 35(3), 191-211.
Aydın, H. & Kaya, Y. (2017). The educational needs of and barriers faced by Syrian
refugee students in Turkey: a qualitative case study, Intercultural Education, 28(5),
456-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n9p74.
Balaguru, S. (2004). Acculturation and its impact on child rearing and child behavioral
problems: A study of Asian-Indian immigrant families. Unpublished PhD
Dissertation, The Faculty of the Curry School of Education University of
Virginia. Virginia, US.
Barnett, W. S., Jung, K., Yarosz, D. J., Thomas, J., Hornbeck, A., Stechuk, R., & Burns, S.
(2008). Educational effects of the Tools of the Mind curriculum: A randomized
trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3), 299-313.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.12.002.
Beltekin, N. (2016). Turkey’s progress toward meeting refugee education needs. The
example of Syrian refugees. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 66, 175-190.
Doi:10.14689/ejer.2016.66.10.
Bennett, J. & Müller, U. (2010). The development of flexibility and abstraction in
preschool children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(4), 455-473.
Bennett, C. I. (2007). Comprehensive multicultural education: Theory and practice (6th ed.).
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Benson, J. E., Sabbagh, M. A., Carlson, S. M., & Zelazo, P. D. (2013). Individual differences
in executive functioning predict preschoolers’ improvement from theory-of-mind
training. Developmental Psychology, 49(9), 1615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031056.
Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010). A developmental perspective on executive function.
Child development, 81(6), 1641-1660. Doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.
Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2011). Relations between executive function and
academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample.
Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 327-336.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.007.
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 257
Blaye, A., & Chevalier, N. (2011). The role of goal representation in preschoolers’
flexibility and inhibition. Journal of experimental child psychology, 108(3), 469-
483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.006.
Blaye, A., & Jacques, S. (2009). Categorical flexibility in preschoolers: Contributions of
conceptual knowledge and executive control. Developmental Science, 12(6), 863-873.
Doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00832.x.
Bilgiç, R. & Bilgin, M. (2016). Analysis of the relationship between the cognitive flexibility
levels and decision strategies in adolescents based on sex and education level.
Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 39-55.
Doi:10.29065/usakead.232432Cited By: 2
Birman, D. (2002). Mental health of refugee children: A guide for the ESL teacher.
Brocki, K. C., & Bohlin, G. (2004). Executive functions in children aged 6 to 13: A
dimensional and developmental study. Developmental neuropsychology, 26(2),
571-593. Doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2602_3.
Brocki, K. C., & Tillman, C. (2014). Mental set shifting in childhood: the role of working
memory and inhibitory control. Infant and Child Development, 23(6), 588-604.
Doi:10.1002/icd.1871
Buttelmann, F., & Karbach, J. (2017). Development and plasticity of cognitive flexibility
in early and middle childhood. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1040.
Doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01040.
Bourgonje, P. (2010). Education for refugee and asylum-seeking children in OECD countries:
Case studies from Australia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Brussels
Education International. 50, 1-12.
Cahalan, M., & Perna, L. (2015). Indicators of Higher Education Equity in the United
States: 45 Year Trend Report. Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher
Education.
Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi (2. Baskı). Ankara:
Pegem.
Candappa, M. and Egharevba, I. (2000). Extraordinary childhoods: the social lives of
refugee children’, in Children 5-16 Research Briefing Number 5. Economic and
Social Research Council.
Carlson, S. M. (2005). Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in
preschool children. Developmental neuropsychology, 28(2), 595-616.
Doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2802_3.
Cartwright, K. B. (2012). Insights from cognitive neuroscience: The importance of
executive function for early reading development and education. Early Education
& Development, 23(1), 24-36. DOI: 10.1080/10409289.2011.615025.
Cerit, T. (2007). The perception of familial relations in adolescents according to a number
of variables. (Unpublished master's thesis), Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri
Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Ceyhan, M. A. & Koçbaş, D. (2011). Göç ve çok dillilik bağlamında okullarda
okuryazarlık edinimi. LAS projesi Türkiye raporu, İstanbul. 06.03.2017 tarihinde
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 258
https://www.unipotsdam.de/fileadmin01/projects/daf/LAS_AyanCeyhan_Ko%C
3%A7bas.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
Ciarino, S. Bonino, S. & R., Miçeli. (2006). Cognitive Flexibility and Social Competence
from Childhood to Early Adolescence. Cognition, Brain, Behavior,10 (2006), 343-
366.
Cragg, L., & Nation, K. (2007). Self-ordered pointing as a test of working memory in
typically developing children. Memory, 15(5), 526-535.
DOI: 10.1080/09658210701390750.
Cooper-Kahn, J., & Foster, M. (2013). Boosting executive skills in the classroom: A practical
guide for educators: John Wiley & Sons.
Coşgun, B. (2019). Self-regulation in at-risk children: exploring factors that affect
cognitive functions in refugee children. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi (Unpublished
master's thesis), İstanbul.
Cummins, J. (1980). The construct of language proficiency in bilingual education. Current
issues in bilingual education, 81-103.
Dajani, D. R., Odriozola, P., Winters, M., Voorhies, W., Marcano, S., Baez, A., Uddin, L.
Q. (2020). Measuring Cognitive Flexibility with the Flexible Item Selection Task:
From fMRI Adaptation to Individual Connectome Mapping. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 32(6), 1026-1045. Doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01536.
Dalhouse, D. W. & Dalhouse, A. D. (2009), When two elephants fight the grass suffers:
Parents and teachers working together to support the literacy development of
Sudanese youth, Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, pp. 328-335.
Doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.014.
Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of
cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from
manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44(11),
2037-2078. Doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006.
Dettlaff, A. J., & Fong, R. (Eds.). (2016). Immigrant and refugee children and families:
Culturally responsive practice. Columbia University Press.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual review of psychology, 64, 135-168.
Doi:1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.
Dilworth-Bart, J. E. (2012). Does executive function mediate SES and home quality
associations with academic readiness? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3),
416-425. Doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.02.002.
Dryden-Peterson, S. (2011). Refugee Education. A Global Review. Geneva: UNHCR.
Espy, K. A. (1997). The Shape School: Assessing executive function in preschool children.
Developmental Neuropsychology, 13(4), 495-499. Doi:10.1080/87565649709540690.
Duncker, K., & Lees, L. S. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological monographs, 58(5),
i.
Emin, M. N. (2019). Türkiye’deki Suriyeli çocukların eğitimi. SET Vakfı İktisadi İşletmesi.
Evans, G. W. (2006). Child development and physical environment. Annual Review
Psychology, 57, 423-451. Doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190057.
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 259
Fazel, M., Reed, R. V., Panter-Brick, C. & Stein, A. (2012). Mental health of displaced and
refugee children resettled in high-income countries: Risk and protective factors.
Lancet. 379: 266–82. Doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60051-2.
Ferfolja, T. (2009). The refugee action support program: Developing understandings of
diversity, in Teaching Education, 20(4), 395-407. Doi:10.1080/10476210902741239.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in
education. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: a
review using an integrative framework. Psychological bulletin, 134(1), 31.
Doi.10.1037/0033- 2909.134.1.31.
Gelman, S. A & Kalish, CW (2006). Conceptual development. Handbook of child
psychology, Doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.006.
Gentner, D., & Lowenstein, J. (2002). Language, literacy, and cognitive development: The
development and consequences of symbolic communication, chapter Relational language
and relational thought: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahweh, NJ.
Geurts, H. M., Verté, S., Oosterlaan, J., Roeyers, H., & Sergeant, J. A. (2004). How specific
are executive functioning deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and
autism? Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 45(4), 836-854. Doi:10.1111/j.1469-
7610.2004.00276.x.
Gökdağ, A., (2020). Investigation of number sense and cognitive flexibility levels of
preschool children aged 5-6. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü,
(Unpublished master's thesis), İstanbul.
Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Elucidating the etiology and nature of beliefs
about parenting styles. Developmental Science, 3(1), 93-112.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00103.
Gümüşten, D. (2017). Review on intervention programs for refugee children’s education
and adaptation. Nesne-Psikoloji Dergisi, 5(10), 247-264.
Günek. F., (2020). Examining the challenges of preschool teachers working with refugee
children through various variables Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü. (Unpublished master's thesis), Çanakkale.
Gürbüz, E. K. (2017). Cognitive flexibility and self-efficacy levels of pedagogical
formation program students. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri
Enstitüsü, (Unpublished master's thesis), Bolu.
Güven, G., Azkeskin, K., Yılmaz, E. (2018). Okul öncesi eğitim alan Suriyeli mülteci
çocukların eğitiminde yaşanan sorunlara ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin
incelenmesi. Uluslararası Çocuk Gelişim Kongresi, Ankara.
Hampton, J. A. (2003). Abstraction and context in concept representation. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435),
1251-1259. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1314.
Harris, K. I. (2016). Supporting executive function skills in early childhood: Using a peer
buddy approach for community, confidence, and citizenship. Journal of Education
and Training, 3(1), 158-175. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jet.v3i1.8837.
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 260
Hart, R. (2009). Child refugees, trauma and education: interactionist considerations on
social and emotional needs and development, Educational Psychology in
Practice, 25(4), pp. 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360903315172.
Hasçuhadar, B., & Coşkun, H. (2018). The mediator role of cognitive flexibility in the
relationship between delay of gratification and creativity in pre-school
children. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 230-249.
Hill, A. (2008). Predictors of relationship satisfaction: the link between cognitive flexibility,
compassionate love and level of differentiation (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis) Alliant
International University, Los Angeles, USA.
Hodes, M. (2000). Psychologically distressed refugee children in the United
Kingdom. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 5(2), 57-68.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-3588.00286.
Jacobsen, G. M., de Mello, C. M., Kochhann, R., & Fonseca, R. P. (2017). Executive
functions in school‐age children: Influence of age, gender, school type and
parental education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 404-413.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3338.
Jacques, S., Zelazo, P., Lourenco, S., & Sutherland, A. (2008). The role of labeling on the
development of cognitive flexibility. Manuscript under revision.
Jacques, S. & Zelazo, P. D. (2001). The Flexible Item Selection Task (FIST): a measure of
executive function in preschoolers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20 (3), 573–
591. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN2003_2.
Isquith, P. K., Gioia, G. A., & Espy, K. A. (2004). Executive function in preschool children:
Examination through everyday behavior. Developmental neuropsychology, 26(1),
403-422. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2601_3.
Kağnıcı, D. Y. (2017). Suriyeli mülteci çocukların kültürel uyum sürecinde okul psikolojik
danışmanlarına düşen rol ve sorumluluklar. Elementary Education Online, 16(4).
Kaplan, A., & Elif, A. (2015). Ortaokul 4. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Eşitsizlik Konusundaki Bilgi
Oluşturma Süreçlerinin İncelenmesi. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 130-
153.
Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi, Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Kardeş, S., & Akman, B. (2018). Suriyeli sığınmacıların eğitimine yönelik öğretmen
görüşleri. Elementary Education Online, 17(3). doi 10.17051/ilkonline.2018.466333.
Kaufman, C. (2010). Executive Function in the Classroom: Practical Strategies for Improving
Performance and Enhancing Skills for All Students: ERIC.
Kaya, A. (2019). Suriyeli mülteci çocukların eğitimi üzerine bir araştırma: Geçici eğitim
merkezleri ve müfredatları. Marmara Üniversitesi, Orta Doğu ve İslam Ülkeleri
Araştırmaları Enstitüsü (Unpublished master's thesis), İstanbul.
Kirk, J., & Cassity, E. (2007). Minimum standards for quality education for refugee youth.
Youth Studies Australia, 26(1), 50.
Kirova, A. (2010). Children's representations of cultural scripts in play: Facilitating
transition from home to preschool in an intercultural early learning program for
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 261
refugee children. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 4(2), 74-91.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15595691003635765.
Kim, H. Y., Brown, L., Dolan, C. T., Sheridan, M., & Aber, J. L. (2020). Post-migration
risks, developmental processes, and learning among Syrian refugee children in
Lebanon. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 69, 101142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101142.
Koç, G. G. (2020). Bilişsel esneklik ve psikolojik dayanıklılık ile stresle başa çıkma arasındaki
ilişkinin incelenmesi, Sakarya Üniversitesi, (Unpublished master's thesis), Sakarya.
Korkut. M., (2018). Refugee children's problems and expectations. Ondokuz Mayıs
Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. (Unpublished master's thesis), Samsun.
Kovinthan, T. (2016). Learning and Teaching with Loss: Meeting the Needs of Refugee
Children Through.
Köklü, N., Büyüköztürk, Ş. & Bökeoğlu, Ç. Ö. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik. Pegem
Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Kömür, B. E. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerinde bilişsel esneklik ile stresle başa çıkma
becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması. Üsküdar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler
Enstitüsü, (Unpublished master's thesis), İstanbul.
Küçüködük, C. (2015). 3-5 yaş arasında ve anaokuluna giden çocuk annelerinin ayrılma
kaygısı ve bağlanma biçimleri ile çocuğun davranışları ve ayrılma kaygısı
arasındaki ilişki: Bilişsel esnekliğin aracı rolü. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal
Bilimler Enstitüsü. (Unpublished master's thesis), Ankara.
Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Loring, D. W., & Fischer, J. S. (2004). Neuropsychological
assessment: Oxford University Press, USA.
Logue, S. F., & Gould, T. J. (2014). The neural and genetic basis of executive function: attention,
cognitive flexibility, and response inhibition. Pharmacology Biochemistry and
Behavior, 123, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.08.007.
Loewen, S. (2004). ‘Second language concerns for refugee children’, in R. Hamilton and
D. Moore (eds.) Educational Interventions for Refugee Children: Theoretical
Perspectives and Implementing Best Practice. London: Routledge. Pp. 35-52.
Marriott, K. (2001) Living in Limbo: Young Separated Refugees in the West Midlands.
West Midlands: Save the Children.
Martin, M. M., & Anderson, C. M. (1998). The cognitive flexibility scale: Three validity
studies. Communication Reports, 11(1), 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219809367680.
Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M., & Thweatt, K. S. (1998). Aggressive communication traits
and their relationships with the cognitive flexibility scale and the
communication flexibility scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(3), 531.
Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological
Reports, 76, 623-626. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623.
Matthews, J. (2008). ‘Schooling and settlement: Refugee education in Australia’, in
International Studies in Sociology of Education. 18(1), 31-45.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09620210802195947.
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 262
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D.
(2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to
complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive psychology, 41(1),
49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.
Moore, A., & Malinowski, P. (2009). Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility.
Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 176-186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.12.008.
Moralı, G. (2018). The problems faced in teaching Turkish as a foreign language to Syrian
refugee children. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 8(15), 1426-
1449. DOI: 10.26466/opus.443945
Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2004). SPSS for introductory
statistics: Use and interpretation. Psychology Press.
Nayfeld, I., Fuccillo, J., & Greenfield, D. B. (2013). Executive functions in early learning:
Extending the relationship between executive functions and school readiness to
science. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 81-88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.011.
Oikonomidoy, E. (2010). Zooming into the school narratives of refugee students.
Multicultural Perspective,12(2),74-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2010.481186
Özcan, D. A., & Esen, B. K. (2016). The investigation of adolescents' cognitive flexibility
and self- efficacy International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 7(24), 1-10.
Özge, Y. (2011) The effects of problem-based learning on cognitive flexibility, self-
regulation skills and students' achievements. (Unpublished master's thesis),
Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Pinson, H. & Arnot, M. (2010). Local conceptualization of the education of asylum-
seeking and refugee students: from hostile to holistic models. International Journal
of Inclusive Education, 14(3), 247-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802504523.
Romine, C. B., & Reynolds, C. R. (2005). A model of the development of frontal lobe
functioning: Findings from a meta-analysis. Applied neuropsychology, 12(4), 190-
201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324826an1204_2.
Roxas, K. (2011), Tales from the front line: Teachers’ responses to Somali Bantu refugee
students, Urban Education, 46(3), pp. 513-548.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085910377856.
Rutter, J. (2006). Refugee children in the UK. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Sağlam, H. İ., & Kanbur, N. İ. (2017). Investigation attitudes towards refugee students of
class teachers' in terms of several variables. Sakarya University Journal of
Education, 7(2), 310-323. Doi: 10.19126/suje.335877.
Sallan Gül, S., Türkmen, E., & Kahya Nizam, Ö. (2019). Most defenseless state of labor in
Turkey: being Syrian refugee child worker the case of Şanlıurfa Çalışma ve
Toplum, 2(61), 917-940.
Sezgin, H. (2019). “Avrupa’da kayıp refakatsiz mülteci çocuklar”, İnsani Sosyal
Araştırmalar Merkezi Araştırma 104, Ağustos 2019.
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 263
Smidts, D. P., Jacobs, R., & Anderson, V. (2004). The object classification task for children
(OCTC): a measure of concept generation and mental flexibility in early childhood.
Developmental neuropsychology, 26(1), 385-401.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2601_2.
Stanley, K. (2001) Cold comfort: Young separated refugees in England. London: Save the
Children.
Son, J. Y., Smith, L. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2008). Simplicity and generalization: Short-
cutting abstraction in children’s object categorizations. Cognition, 108(3), 626-638.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.002.
Stevens, A. D. (2009). Social problem-solving and cognitive flexibility: Relations to social skills
and problem behavior of at-risk young children. Seattle: Seattle Pacific University Press.
Suarez-Orozco, C., & Suarez-Orozco, M. (2001). Children of immigration. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Şafak, Ş., Çopur, Z. & Özkan, M. A. (2006). Çocukların evle ilgili faaliyetlere harcadıkları
zamanın incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyolojik Araştırmalar e-dergisi, 18
Aralık 2020, http://www.sdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/makaleler/sszcmao.pdf.
Şeker, B. D., & Aslan, Z. (2015). Refugee children in the educational process: a social
psychological assessment Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 8(1), 86-105. DOI number:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5578/keg.8234.
Tan, Ş. (2016). SPSS ve excel uygulamalı temel istatistik-1. Pegem Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Thabet, A., Abed, Y. & Vostanis, P. (2004). Comorbidity of PTSD and depression among
refugee children during war conflict. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
45(3), 533-542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00243.x.
Tuncer, N., & Avcı, N. (2019). Developing a tool to evaluate competence of pre-school
teachers to use strategies supporting children’s executive functioning Mehmet Akif
Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. (52), 212-236.
https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.552000.
Tuncer, N., & Avcı, N. (2018). Classroom strategies promoting the development of
preschoolers’ executive functions (a qualitative analysis). International Journal of
Eurasia Social Sciences, 9(32), 1224-1283.
Tuncer, N. (2018). An analysis of the effectiveness of the teacher training program
regarding supporting preschool children's executive functions. (Unpublished
Ph.D. thesis), Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Tutuş, A. (2019). The relationship between the ways of coping with stress and cognitive
flexibility of adolescents between 11-14 years of age. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal
Bilimler Enstitüsü, (Unpublished master's thesis) Mersin.
Tüzün, I. (2017). Türkiye’de mülteci çocukların eğitim hakkını ve karşılıklı uyumu
destekleyen yaklaşımlar, politikalar ve uygulamalar. In Byy.: European Liberal
Forum.
Uzun, E. M., & Bütün, E. (2016). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarındaki Suriyeli sığınmacı
çocukların karşılaştıkları sorunlar hakkında öğretmen görüşleri. Uluslararası Erken
Çocukluk Eğitimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(1).
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 264
Vandenbroucke, L., Verschueren, K., & Baeyens, D. (2017). The development of executive
functioning across the transition to first grade and its predictive value for
academic achievement. Learning and Instruction, 49, 103-112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.008.
Vernon-Feagans, L., Willoughby, M., & Garrett-Peters, P. (2016). Predictors of behavioral
regulation in kindergarten: Household chaos, parenting, and early executive
functions. Developmental Psychology, 52(3), 430. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000087
Vitiello, V. E., & Greenfield, D. B. (2017). Executive functions and approaches to learning
in predicting school readiness. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.08.004.
Wagner, T. M. (2013). Supporting refugee children in Pennsylvania public schools
(Unpublished Doctoral dissertation), University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Welsh, J. A., Nix, R. L., Blair, C., Bierman, K. L., & Nelson, K. E. (2010). The development
of cognitive skills and gains in academic school readiness for children from low-
income families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 43.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016738.
Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development.
Wong, S. S., Jacques, S., & Zelazo, P. D. (2008). A preliminary investigation of the effects
of emotional stimuli on 4-year-old children? abstraction and cognitive flexibility
on the flexible item selection task (FIST). University of Toronto Journal of
Undergraduate Life Sciences, 2(1).
Yavuz, Ö., & Mızrak, S. (2016). Education of school-age children in emergencies: the case
of Syrian refugees in Turkey. Göç Dergisi, 3(2), 175-199.
Yaylacı, G. F., Serpil, H., & Yaylacı, A. F. (2017). Refugee and asylum-seeker education
from stakeholder perspectives: Eskişehir case. Mediterranean Journal of
Educational Research, Issue 22, Year 2017, pp.101-117.
Zelazo, P. D. (2004). The development of conscious control in childhood. Trends in
cognitive sciences, 8(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.001.
Zelazo, P. D. (2015). Executive function: Reflection, iterative reprocessing, complexity,
and the developing brain. Developmental Review, 38, 55-68.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.001.
Zelazo, P. D., & Carlson, S. M. (2012). Hot and cool executive function in childhood and
adolescence: Development and plasticity. Child Development Perspectives, 6(4), 354-
360. S https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00246.x.
Nuran Tuncer
COMPARING THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SKILLS OF TURKISH AND
REFUGEE PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: FLEXIBLE ITEM SELECTION TASK (FIST)
European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 8 │ Issue 1 │ 2021 265
Creative Commons licensing terms Author(s) will retain the copyright of their published articles agreeing that a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) terms will be applied to their work. Under the terms of this license, no permission is required from the author(s) or publisher for members of the community to copy, distribute, transmit or adapt the article content, providing a proper, prominent and unambiguous attribution to the authors in a manner that
makes clear that the materials are being reused under permission of a Creative Commons License. Views, opinions and conclusions expressed in this research article are views, opinions and conclusions of the author(s). Open Access Publishing Group and European Journal of Education Studies shall not be responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability caused in relation to/arising out of conflicts of interest, copyright violations and inappropriate or inaccurate use of any kind content related or integrated into the research work. All the published works are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).