Post on 13-Apr-2018
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
1/16
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology Copyright 2000 by the Educational Publishing Foundation
2000, Vol. 5,N o. 1,9 5-1 10 1076-8998/00/ 5.00 DO I: 10.1037//1076-8998.5.1.95
E m o t io n R e g u l a ti o n in th e W o rk p la ce A N e w W a y
t o C o n c e p t u a l iz e E m o t io n a l L a b o r
A l i c i a A . G r a n d e y
P e n n s y l v a n i a S t a te U n i v e r s i t y
The topic o f emotions in the workplace is beginning to garner closer attention b y researchers and
theorists. Th e study of emotional labor addresses the stress of managing emotions when the w ork
role demands that certain expressions be shown to customers. However, there has been no
overarching framework to guide this work, and the previous studies have often disagreed on the
definition and operationalization of emotional labor. The purpos es o f this article are as follows: to
rev iew and compare previous perspectives of emotional labor, to provide a definition of emotional
labor that integrates these perspectives, to discuss emotion regulation as a guiding theory for
understanding the mechanisms of emotional labor, and to present a model o f emotional lab or that
includes individual differences (such as emotional intelligence) and organizational factors (such as
supervisor support).
I n t h e p a s t , e m o t i o n s w e r e i g n o r e d i n t h e s t u d y o f
o r g a n i z a t i o n a l b e h a v i o r ( A r v e y , R e n z , & W a t s o n ,
1 9 9 8 ; P u t n a m & M u m b y , 1 9 9 3 ) . T h e w o r k p l a c e w a s
v i e w e d a s a r a t i o n a l e n v i r o n m e n t , w h e r e e m o t i o n s
w o u l d g e t i n t h e w a y o f s o u n d j u d g m e n t . T h u s ,
e m o t i o n s w e r e n o t e v e n c o n s i d e r e d a s e x p l a n a t i o n s
f o r w o r k p l a c e p h e n o m e n o n . T h i s v i e w i s b e i n g
d i s m a n t l e d a s m o r e r e s e a r c h e r s a r e f i n d i n g h o w
w o r k p l a c e e m o t i o n s h e l p t o e x p l a i n i m p o r t a n t i n d i -
v i d u a l a n d o r g a n i z a t i o n a l o u t c o m e s ( f o r a r e v i e w , s e e
A r v e y e t a l . , 1 9 9 8 ) . M o r e s p e c i f ic a l ly , r e s ea r c h e r s a r e
b e g i n n i n g t o e x p l o r e h o w e m o t i o n s a r e m a n a g e d b y
e m p l o y e e s t o i m p r o v e w o r k o u t c o m e s . O n e e x a m p l e
i s a n e m p l o y e e c h a n g i n g h o w s h e f e e l s , o r w h a t
f e e l i n g s s h e s h o w s , i n o r d e r t o i n t e r a c t w i t h
c u s t o m e r s o r c li e n t s in a n e f f e c t i v e w a y. T h e f o c u s o f
t h e p r e s e n t a r t i c l e i s o n t h e m a n a g e m e n t , o r
m o d i f i c a t i o n , o f e m o t i o n s a s p a r t o f t h e w o r k r o l e .
M a n a g i n g e m o t i o n s f o r a w a g e h a s b e e n t e r m e d
e m o t ion l l bor
( H o c h s c h i l d , 1 9 8 3 ).
O v e r v i e w o f E m o t i o n a l L a b o r
E m o t i o n a l l a b o r m a y i n v o l v e e n h a n ci n g , f a k i n g , o r
s u p p r e s s i n g e m o t i o n s t o m o d i f y t h e e m o t i o n a l
e x p r e s s i o n . G e n e r a l l y , e m o t i o n s a r e m a n a g e d i n
r e s p o n s e t o t h e
displ y ru les
f o r t h e o r g a n i z a t i o n o r
j o b ( E k m a n & F r i e s e n , 1 9 7 5 ; G o f f m a n , 1 9 5 9 ;
H o c h s c h i l d , 1 9 8 3 ). T h e s e r u l e s r e g a r d i n g t h e e x p e c t a -
t i o n s f o r e m o t i o n a l e x p r e s s i o n m a y b e s t a t e d
Correspondence concerning this article should be ad-
dressed to Alicia A. Grandey, Department of Psychology,
Pennsylvania State U niversity, University Park, P ennsylvania
16802-1304. Electronic mail m ay be sent to aag6@psu.edu.
exp l i c i t l y i n se l ec t i on and t r a in ing m a te r i a l s , o r
k n o w n b y o b s e r v a t io n o f co w o r k e r s . M a n y w o r k
r o l e s h a v e d i s p l a y r u l e s r e g a r d i n g t h e e m o t i o n s t h a t
e m p l o y e e s s h o u l d s h o w t h e p u b l i c ( B es t , D o w n e y , &
J o n e s , 1 9 9 7 ; H o c h s c h i l d , 1 98 3) . F o r e x a m p l e , t h o s e
w h o w o r k i n c u s t o m e r s e r v i c e m a y e n c o u r a g e r e p e a t
b u s i ne s s b y s h o w i n g s m i l e s a n d g o o d h u m o r , w h e r e a s
t h o s e w h o w o r k a s b i l l c o l l e c t o r s o r i n l a w
e n f o r c e m e n t m a y f i n d t h a t a n a n g r y d e m e a n o r r e s u l t s
i n t h e b e s t c u s t o m e r r e s p o n s e ( H o c h s c h i l d , 1 98 3 ;
S u t t o n , 1 9 9 1 ; V a n M a a n e n & K u n d a , 1 9 8 9 ) . F o r
t h e r a p is t s o r j u d g e s , a l a c k o f e m o t i o n a l r e s p o n d i n g
m a y b e n e e d e d w h e n l i s t e n i n g t o c l ie n t s . I n e a c h c a s e,
t h e e m o t i o n a l e x p r e s s i o n ( o r s u p p r e s s i o n ) r e s u l t s i n
m o r e e f f e c t i v e w o r k p l a c e i n t e ra c t io n .
A l t h o u g h e m o t i o n a l l a b o r m a y b e h e l p f u l t o t h e
o r g a n i z a t i o n a l b o t t o m - l i n e , t h e r e h a s b e e n r e c e n t
w o r k s u g g e s t in g t h a t m a n a g i n g e m o t i o n s f o r p ay m a y
b e d e t r i m e n t a l t o t h e e m p l o y e e . H o c h s c h i l d ( 1 9 8 3 )
a n d o t h e r s h a v e p r o p o s e d t h a t e m o t i o n a l l a b o r i s
s t r e ss f u l a n d m a y r e s u l t i n b u r n o u t. T o d a te , h o w e v e r ,
t h e s p e c i f ic m e c h a n i s m s i n u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h e r e la t i o n
o f e m o t i o n a l l a b o r w i t h s tr e s s o u t c o m e s h a v e b e e n
u n c l e a r . I n f a c t , t h e p r e v i o u s w o r k s h a v e n o t e v e n
a g r e e d o n w h a t i s m e a n t b y e m o t i o n a l l a b o r . I n t h i s
a r t ic l e , I f i r st r e v i e w p r e v i o u s t h e o r e t i c a l p e r s p e c t i v e s
a n d t h e n p r e s e n t a c o n c e p t u a l i z a t i o n o f e m o t i o n a l
l a b o r t h a t i n t e g r a t e s t h e s e i d e a s . I n t h e s e c o n d s e c t io n ,
I i n t r o d u c e e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n a s a g u i d i n g t h e o r y f o r
u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h e m e c h a n i s m s b y w h i c h e m o t i o n a l
l a b o r m a y b e s t r e s s f u l t o i n d i v i d u a l s b u t s t i ll b e u s e f u l
t o t he o rgan i za t i on . F ina l l y , I spec i fy an t eceden t s and
c o n s e q u e n c e s o f e m o t i o n a l l a b or , b a s e d o n t h is
t h e o r y , a n d p r e s e n t i n d i v i d u a l a n d s i t u a t i o n a l
95
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
2/16
96 GRANDEY
variables that may have implications for the relation-
ships and human resource processes.
P r e v io u s P e r s p e c t i ve s o n E m o t i o n a l L a b o r
Three conceptualizations of emotional labor that
have greatly influenced the field also demonstrate the
confusing nature of the definition of emotional labor
(Ashforth & Humphrey, 1993; Hochschild, 1983;
Morris & Feldman, 1996). Each of these assume that
emotions are being managed at work in order to meet
the display rules stated by the organization and
suggest either individual or organizational outcomes
of emotional labor. These articles provide useful
groundwork for future studies. However, they contain
contradictions in terms of how to define and
conceptualize emotional labor. Such contradictions
create difficulties for future researchers, as discussed
by Brotheridge and Lee (1998). These previous
articles are discussed below in terms of their
contributions to understanding organizationally man-
dated emotion management, and their limitations.
H o c h s c h i l d s ( 1 9 8 3 ) P e r s p e c t i v e
One of the earliest works to bring this facet of
organizational life to the public's attention was the
book
The Managed Heart: The Comm ercial izat ion o f
Feeling, by sociologist Arlie Russell Hochschild.
Hochschild (1983) coined the term
emotional labor
to
refer to the management of feeling to create a
publicly observable facial and bodily display (p. 7).
Hochschild's work stemmed from the dramaturgical
perspective of customer interactions, where the
customer is the audience, the employee is the actor,
and the work setting is the stage (Goffman, 1959;
Grove & Fisk, 1989). In this perspective, the
performance involves impression management of
service employees where actors may employ
expressive devices in order to achieve this goal
(Grove & Fisk, 1989, p. 430). In other words,
managing emotions is one way for employees to
achieve organizational goals. If an employee were to
express a depressed mood or anger toward a coworker
or customer, that would ruin the performance.
Hochscbild's (1983) dramaturgical perspective of-
fered two main ways for actors to manage emotions:
through
surface act ing,
where one regulates the
emotional expressions, and through
deep acting,
where one consciously modifies feelings in order to
express the desired emotion.
One of Hochschild's (1983) major tenents is that
this management of emotions requires effort. Hochs-
child's book raised public and academic conscious-
ness that managing emotions in the work setting
existed and may be detr imental to the employee. Not
only are the processes of surface and deep acting
effortful, but as Hochschild (1979) stated, when
deep gestures of exchange enter the market sector and
are bought and sold as an aspect of labor power,
feelings are commoditized (p. 569). This commoditi-
zation, where the organization controls something as
personal as emotions, is suggested to be unpleasant to
the employee. Because of this unpleasantness and the
effort i t takes to maintain a smiling face while coping
with difficult customers, emotional labor is proposed
by Hochschild to relate to burnout and job stress.
A s h f o r t h a n d H u m p h r e y s ( 1 9 9 3 ) P e r s p e c t i v e
Ashforth and Humphrey (1993) defined emotional
labor as the act of displaying appropriate emotions,
with the goal to engage in a form of impression
management for the organization (Gardner & Mar-
tinko, 1988). In comparison with Hochschild's (1983)
perspective, Ashforth and Humphrey were more
concerned with emotional labor as an observable
behavior than as a management of feelings. Ashforth
and Humphrey (1993) downplayed the importance of
the internal management of emotions through surface
and deep acting and suggested instead a broader array
of factors that affect the emotional expression of
employees. In addition, they argued that emotional
labor does not necessarily require conscious effort. In
fact, they suggested that surface and deep acting may
become routine and effortless for the employee, rather
than sources of stress.
In terms of outcomes, Ashforth and Humphrey
(1993) focused mainly on the relationship between
these observable expressions and task effectiveness or
performance. They proposed that emotional labor
should be positively related to task effectiveness,
provided that the customer perceives the expression
as sincere.
Ashforth and Humphrey agreed with
Hochschild that if employees are not showing
genuine expressions, emotional labor may be dysfunc-
tional to employees by creating a need to dissociate
from self (particularly if deep acting). However, they
do not provide a way of understanding how this may
happen within the individual.
Thus, there are two main differences between this
perspective and Hochschild's. The definition of
emotional labor suggested here focuses on observable
behaviors, not feelings, including emotional displays
that are effortless or genuine. And second, they focus
on the impact of emotional labor on task effective-
ness, rather than on the individual'shealth or stress.
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
3/16
SPECIAL SECTION: EMOTION REGULATION N THE WORKPLACE 97
Morris a nd Feldman s (1996) Perspective
Morris and Feldman (1996) defined emotional
labor as the effort, planning, and control needed to
express organizationally desired emotion during
interpersonal transactions (p. 987). This definition
comes from an interactionist approach, where emo-
tions are expressed in, and partially determined by,
the social environment. This perspective is similar to
those of Hochschild (1983) and Ashfot~th and
Humphrey (1993) in that it acknowledges that
emotions can be modified and controlled by an
individual , and the broader social setting determines
when that happens. These authors proposed that
emotional labor consists of four dimensions: (a)
frequency of interactions, (b) attentiveness (intensity
of emotions, duration of interaction), (c) variety of
emotions required, and (d) emotional dissonance.
Emotional dissonance was discussed by Hochschild
(1983) as a state wherein the emotions expressed are
discrepant from the emotions felt. Surface and deep
acting, focused on by Hochschild (1983) and
discussed by Ashforth and Humphrey (1993), are
discussed as a minor facet within the dimension of
attentiveness. Job dissatisfaction and emotional ex-
haustion are proposed as outcomes of the dimension
of dissonance, although again, the mechanisms by
which these outcomes would occur are vague.
This definition of emotional labor includes the
organizational expectations for employees in their
interactions with customers (how long, how intense,
how often), as well as the internal state of tension that
occurs when a person must display emotions that are
discrepant from his or her true feelings (emotional
dissonance). The problem with this conceptualization
is that a good case is not made for how frequency,
duration, and variety define emotional labor. The
explanation provided by Morris and Feldman (1997)
for the dimensions as components of emotional labor
is circular: Emotional labor can best be described in
terms of frequency of emotional labor (p. 257).
Other researchers (Kruml & Geddes, 1998; Zerbe,
1998) have used the dimension of dissonance as a
defining dimension of emotional labor, but this
definit ion has some difficulties as well. One, it is a
state of being, rather than an effortful process, which
does not fit the authors' definition of emotional labor.
Two, experiencing dissonance does not comprehen-
sively cover all the ways one may manage emotions
at work. In short, I suggest that the four proposed
dimensions do not completely define the emotion
management process of the employee.
Emotional Labor as Managing Expressions
and Feel ings: Surface and Deep Act ing
Thus, emotional labor has been defined as the
characteristics of the job (as defined by Morris and
Feldman, 1997) and the observable expressions of
employees (as defined by Ashforth and Humphrey,
1993). However, isn' t it conceivable that the former
contributes to the situation that invokes emotional
labor, and the latter is the proximal goal of emotional
labor? The more distal goal is to gain loyal customers
for the organization (the focus of Ashforth and
Humphrey, 1993). Other ancillary outcomes may
include negative attitudes and poor health for the
employee (the focus of Hochschild, 1983, and Morris
and Feldman, 1997). In order to understand all of
these components, an integrated definition and
theoretical model are needed.
For the definition, one can look at the similarities
across the three studies. Although these previous
works stem from different perspectives, define
emotional labor differently, and focus on different
outcomes, they all have the same underlying theme:
Individuals can regulate their emotional expressions
at work. Emotional labor, then, is the process of
regulat ing both feelings and expressions for the
organizational goals. Specifically, each perspective
discusses surface and deep acting as a way of
managing emotions. The processes of surface acting
(managing observable expressions) and deep acting
(managing feelings) match the working definition of
emotional labor as a process of emotional regulation,
and they provide a useful way of operationalizing
emotional labor.
Thinking of emotional labor as surface and deep
acting is beneficial for several reasons. First, surface
and deep acting are not inherently value laden.
Although dissonance is a negative state of being,
surface and deep acting are processes that may have
positive or negative results. This allows researchers to
explain negative outcomes such as individual stress
and health problems, and positive results such as
customer service. Second, conceptualizing surface
and deep acting as emotional labor has utility. I f there
are differences in how these two processes of emotion
management relate to the outcomes, suggestions can
be made for organizational training and stress
management programs. Finally, seeing emotional
labor as surface and deep acting ties directly into an
established theoretical model. Although models have
been proposed, they do not clearly explain why
managing emotions should relate to the proposed
outcomes. I suggest that the concepts of surface and
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
4/16
98 GRANDEY
deep acting map onto well-established emotion
regulation theory. Hochschild (1983) discussed gen-
eral emotion theory, but it is not explicitly applied to
the relationships she proposed. A broad emotion
theory can help organize and make predictions about
these mechanisms of emotional labor. In the follow-
ing section, I review the theory of emotion regulation
as it applies to emotional labor.
Emotion Regulation Theory Applied
to Emotional Labor
Strangely, perspectives on emotional labor have
not specifically considered emotion theory since
Hochschild. In the emotions literature, there is little
agreement on what is meant by emotions (Arvey et
al., 1998), but the term usually refers to physiological
arousal and cognitive appraisal of the situation. By
regulating the arousal and cognitions that define
emotions, individuals can control their emotional
expressions to fit the display rules of the situation
(Goffman, 1959). Similarly, employees regulate their
arousal and cognitions in order to display the
appropriate emotions at work. Emotion regulation
theory, defined as the processes by which individu-
als influence which emotions they have, when they
have them, and how they experience and express
these emotions (Gross, 1998b, p. 275), provides a
very useful guiding framework for emotional labor.
Not only that, but emotion regulation research has
explicitly considered the role of physiological arousal
much more closely than emotional labor theorists
have in the past. Understanding the effect that
prolonged arousal and suppression of this arousal
have provides the literature with the mechanisms by
which emotional labor may lead to burnout and stress.
General M odel o f Em ot ion Regula tion
Recent works by Gross (1998a, 1998b) propose a
process model of emotion regulation that may be
specifically useful for the emotional labor topic. In
this input -output model, individuals receive stimula-
tion from the situation and respond with emotions.
The situation acts as a cue to the individual, and the
individual'semotional response tendency (physiologi-
cal, behavioral, cognitive) provides information to
that individual and the others in the social environ-
ment (Freud, 1936/1961; Frijda, 1986).
Gross's (1998b) model proposes that emotion
regulation can occur at two points in this process. At
the first point, called antecedent-focused, an indi-
vidual can regulate the precursors of emotion such as
the situation or the appraisal. At the second point,
response-focused, the individual modifies the physi-
ological or observable signs of emotions. These two
processes of emotion regulation correspond to the
emotional labor concept of deep acting and surface
acting. Application of general emotion theory to
emotional labor can help explicate these processes of
emotion management and form predictions about
consequences as well. According to both emotional
labor theorists and emotion researchers, the manage-
ment of emotions through acting may have detrimen-
tal outcomes for individuals. In the next two sections,
I discuss the two methods of emotion regulation,
antecedent-focused and response-focused, and how
they apply to the concepts of deep acting and surface
acting. In the following section, I propose general
predictions for these processes based on emotion
regulation theory and previous research.
Antecedent Focused Emotion Regulat ion
According to emotion regulation theory proposed
by Gross (1998a, 1998b) the individual can regulate
emotions at two points. At the first intervening point,
an individual can engage in antecedent-focused
emotion regulation, where the individual modifies the
situation or the perception of the situation in order to
adjust emotions. Gross (1998b) stated that different
types of antecedent-focused emotion regulation are
situation selection, situation modification, attention
deployment, and cognitive change. The first two types
involve adjustments in the emotion-inducing situa-
tion. As interact ionist theory discusses, people often
choose the situations in which they act, including the
situations that may create emotions (Buss, 1987).
Employees may choose their jobs, but for service
employees there may be little opportunity for
situation selection beyond that as a method to regulate
emotions. To enact situation modification, an em-
ployee may choose to leave the work floor if a certain
customer approaches (Bailey, 1996), but this lack of
availability is not quali ty customer service (Parasura-
man, Zeithaml, & Berry, 1985) and may result in
consequences for the individual. With the lack of
options to choose or modify the situation, emotion
regulation may take the form of the employee leaving
the organization. In short, service employees may not
have the breadth of situation modification that is
available outside of a work role.
However, more relevant for this article are the
other two techniques of antecedent-focused emotion
regulation. In these, employees can modify how they
perceive the situation in order to adjust their
emotional response to the situation. With attentional
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
5/16
SPECIAL SECTION: EMOTION REGULATION N THE WORKPLACE 99
deployment and cognitive change, the regulation
involves the employee managing emotions by chang-
ing the attenfional focus and appraisal of the situation.
Attentional deployment.
Attentional deployment
is done by thinking about events that call up the
emotions that one needs in that situation, known as
method acting in theatre (Gross, 1998b, p. 284;
Stanislovsky, 1965). The concept of deep acting, in its
original form by Hochschild (1983), is very similar to
attentional deployment. An example of this form of
emotion management is an aspiring opera singer I
knew whistling arias while serving customers in a
coffeehouse. Doing something she loved helped her
to focus on feeling good and to express positive
emotions at work. One employee in a pilot study by
the author wrote an example of attentional deploy-
ment: Somet ime s. .. I have to change my mood and
boost my energy to teach . . . . I have to focus on being
positive and maintaining hat (Grandey, 1998).
Cognitive change. The other antecedent-focused
method is cognitive change, where one perceives the
situation so that the emotional impact is lessened
(Lazarus, 1991). For example, Hochschild (1983)
described flight attendants who were trained to
cognitively reappraise passengers as children so that
they would not become angry with passengers'
potentially infant ile behaviors. Reapprais ing work
events as challenging, rather than stressful, can also
help buffer against stress reactions (Folkrnan &
Lazarus, 1991; Lazarus, 1991). This type of emotion
regulation is also deep, in that the internal
processes (thoughts and feelings) are modified with
the goal to make the expression more genuine. The
difference is that attentional deployment focuses upon
changing the focus o f personal thoughts, and
cognitive change focuses on changing appraisals of
the external situation.
Response Focused Emotion Regulation
At the second intervention point, according to the
process model by Gross (1998b), an individual could
engage in response-focused emotion regulation, or
response modulation. In this process, the person has a
tendency toward an emotional response, but manipu-
lates how he or she shows that emotional response by
directly influencing physiological, experiential, or
behavioral responding (Gross, 1998b, p. 285).
Rather than adjusting the situation or the perception
of the situation, the individual manipulates the
emotional expression of his or her reaction to the
situation. This could be done with exercise or drugs
that induce the appropriate state (which helps explain
why organizat ions may want to provide free coffee to
their front-line employees). An individual may also
adjust the intensity of the displayed emotion, or fake
the expression entirely.
Response-focused emotion regulation corresponds
with the process of surface acting. An employee may
paste a smile on her face though she is feeling blah
(adjusting intensity) or may put on a empathic
mask in order to remain polite toward the customer
who is annoying (fake the display). In a pilot study by
the author, employees wrote about such experiences
in their jobs: I had to be very accepting and
empathetic to a client who I did not at all like and I
was worried about a personal matter, but had to be
polite to other workers (Grandey, 1998). Response-
focused processes have also been found in descriptive
studies of service workers (Hochschild, 1983; Van-
Maanen & Kunda, 1989). In this emotion manage-
ment technique, employees work to display more
emotion than they feel, or to suppress true feelings
and show acceptable expression. This emotional
regulation technique is concerned with modifying
expression, not the internal feelings, as in deep acting.
Mechanisms of Emotion Regulation
According to emotion regulation theory, individu-
als may regulate their emotions at several points in
the emotion process. If we apply this to the work
setting, we can think of the process general ly in the
following way. The job environment or a particular
work event may induce an emotion response in the
employee (e.g., anger, sadness, anxiety), and behav-
iors may follow that would be inappropriate for the
encounter (e.g., verbal attack, crying, complaining).
Because the display rules state that such reactions are
not appropriate, emotional labor regulates his or her
response. This regulation involves modifying feelings
by thinking good thoughts or reappraising the
event (deep acting), or modifying expression by
faking or enhancing facial and bodily signs of
emotion (surface acting).
But how does regulating emotions result in
burnout, job dissatisfaction, or emotional estrange-
ment, as proposed by Hochschild (1983) and others?
To answer this question regarding the mechanism of
emotional labor, one must go to general theories of
emotion and stress (see Lazarus, 1999). The experi-
ence of both emotions and stress are known to be
accompanied by a physiological state of arousal
involving he endocrine system (release of hormones)
and the autonomic nervous system (increased heart
rate, breathing, blood pressure, skin conductance).
While in this arousal state, the body is converting its
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
6/16
l ~ GRANDEY
resources to energy to respond to the current crisis.
This means that energy is not available for other tasks,
such as the immune system. For the past 30 years or
so, psychologists have found that emotions and the
management of emotions are associated with health
problems such as cancer and heart disease (Gross,
1989, 1998a; Pennebaker, 1990; Steptoe, 1993).
Generally, individuals experience a physiological
state of arousal or emotion (anger or fear), and they
then have an emotional tendency (attack or flee). This
corresponds with Frijda's (1986) idea of action
readiness, and Freud's (1936/1961) idea that emo-
tions provide cues about the environment. The
arousal state from emotions informs them and gets
them in a bodily state to respond to the situation. But
in today's society, people learn to regulate that
emotional tendency, so that their emotional reactions
to other people don't result in fight or flight (Cannon,
1932). So, these action tendencies to respond to
emotion-producing stimuli are overridden by coping
or regulatory processes so that people do not act
inappropriately in social settings (Lazarus, 1991).
In order to show the appropriate emotion for a
situation, sometimes individuals must inhibit or
suppress feelings. Research on deception has found
that people are able to inhibit expressions with only
slight observable signs of the deception taking place
(Ekman & Friesen, 1975). However, this regulation
for the social interaction may tax the system.
Inhibiting feelings and emotional expression lowers
behavioral activity, but has actually been found to
increase autonomic nervous system activity (Gross,
1998a; Pennebaker, 1985). Thus, it is reasonable to
predict that long-term inhibition would be associated
with overall heightened physiological activity (Pen-
nebaker, 1985, p. 85). This physiological activity, or
bottling up of emotions, taxes the body over time
by overworking the cardiovascular and nervous systems
and weakening the immune system. As evidence of
this process, research has linked the inhibit ion of
emotions to a variety of physical illness, including
higher blood pressure and cancer (Blackburn, 1965;
Gross, 1989; King & Emmons, 1990; Smith, 1992).
In fact, inabili ty o express negative emotion is one of
the strongest predictors of cancer (Cox & McCay,
1982; Derogatis, Abeloff, & Melisaratos, 1979).
emotions for social situations, but regulation of
emotions may be stressful to their health. Emotional
labor, or regulating emotions for the work role, may
be successful in the impression management sense,
but may be detrimental to the employee's health.
Specific studies from this paradigm are instructive in
how deep acting and surface acting, two proposed
processes of emotional labor, would relate to
organizational and individual outcomes.
Deep c t ing
Engaging in deep act ing through reappraisal or
self-talk has been called a good faith type of
emotional labor because it shows the employee has
goodwill toward the organization (Rafaeli & Sutton,
1987). However, the effect of this regulatory process
on the individual s uncertain. The emotion regulation
work in one lab study suggested that encouraging
participants to interpret verbal harassment in a more
detached, nonthreatening way decreased physiologi-
cal arousal to that stimulus (Stemmler, 1997). This
cognitive change modified participants ' actual
emotional arousal state in response to this negative
situation. But emotion is a complex construct. Gross
(1998a) found mixed support for the effect of deep
acting on arousal in another study. Using self-reports
of emotion, mult iple physiological measures such as
finger temperature and heart rate, and rater's observa-
tions of emotion expressions, he measured the
responses of participants to a video designed to elicit
disgust. Individuals who were told to engage in
reappraisal reported lower levels of self-reported
emotion and lower observable signs of emotions than
those who were not told to reappraise the situation.
These two taken together would suggest an actual
change in feelings had occurred, or that deep acting
was successful. Interestingly, however, the reap-
praisal group did
not
have lower physiological signs
of emotion than the other group. Although deep
acting in this form may regulate observable signs of
emotions and even the individual' s perception of his
or her own emotions, it is unclear whether deep acting
actually lowers the physiological arousal.
Surface cting
Gen eral Predict ions for Surface and De ep
cting Base d on Em otion Regulation Theory
The emotion research is valuable to the study of
emotional labor in that it supports two main
assumptions: Individuals can and do regulate their
Surface acting, or antecedent-focused emotion
regulation, may be desirable to organizations so that
customers or clients always see the expressions that
are mandated, even when the employee may feel
differently. However, Hochschild (1983) suggested
that this job demand results in stressful experiences
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
7/16
SPE CIAL SE CT ION: E MO T ION RE GUL AT ION IN T HE WO RKPL ACE 101
f o r t h e e m p l o y e e . T h i s m a y b e b e c a u s e i n d i v i d u a l s
g e n e r a l l y d o n o t l i k e t o f e e l f a k e , o r i n t h e
l o n g - t e r m , b e c a u s e s u p p r e s s i n g t r u e e m o t i o n s a n d
e x p r e s s i n g f a l s e e m o t i o n s r e q u i r e s e f f o r t t h a t r e s u l t s
i n s tr e s s o u t c o m e s . F o r e x a m p l e , i n t w o r e c e n t s t u d i e s
p a r t i c i p a n t s w e r e a s k e d t o s u p p r e s s t h e e m o t i o n a l
e x p r e s s i o n o f e i t h e r s a d n e s s o r d i s g u s t ( G r o s s , 1 9 9 8 a ;
G r o s s & L e v e n s o n , 1 9 9 7 ) . T h e s u p p r e s s i o n c o n d i t i o n
r e s u l t e d i n d e c r e a s e d o b s e r v a b l e s i g n s o f e m o t i o n ,
s u c h t h a t r a t i n g s o f p a r t i c i p a n t s ' f a c i a l a n d b o d i l y
r e s p o n s e s t o e m o t i o n - i n d u c i n g s t i m u l i w e r e l o w e r
t h a n a n o n s u p p r e s s i o n c o n d i t i o n . I n o t h e r w o r d s ,
p e o p l e a r e c a p a b l e o f s u p p r e s s i n g t h e i r e m o t i o n s s o
t h a t o t h e r s c a n n o t s e e h o w t h e y t r u l y f e e l . H o w e v e r ,
t h e l e v e l s o f t h e s e l f - r e p o r t e d e x p e r i e n c e o f e m o t i o n
i n t h e s e t w o s t u d i e s , a n d t h e p h y s i o l o g i c a l s i g n s o f
e m o t i o n a l a c t i v a t i o n , d i d n o t d e c r e a s e . T h u s , t h e
p a r t i ci p a n t s w e r e a w a r e t h a t t h e y w e r e f a k i n g , a n d
t h e y s t i l l h a d a s t a te o f e m o t i o n a l a r o u s a l . A c c o r d i n g
t o r e c e n t e m o t i o n t h e o r y a n d r e c e n t e m o t i o n r e g u l a -
t i o n l a b s t u d i e s , b o t h s u r f a c e a n d d e e p a c t i n g
t e c h n i q u e s m a y r e s u l t i n t h e r e q u i r e d e m o t i o n a l
e x p r e s s i o n , b u t t h e p h y s i o l o g i c a l e m o t i o n a l r e s p o n s e
m a y s t i l l b e a c t i v e . S u c h s t u d i e s m a y h e l p e x p l a i n
h o w e m o t i o n a l l a b o r c a n r e l a t e f u n c t i o n a l l y t o
p e r f o r m a n c e m e a s u r e s b u t c a n b e d y s f u n c t i o n a l f o r
t h e i n d i v i d u a l ' s h e a l t h a n d s t re s s .
A C a v e a t
I t is r e c o g n i z e d t h a t t h e s e s t u d i e s d i f f e r in s e v e r a l
w a y s f r o m t h e s i t u a t i o n s f a c e d b y e m p l o y e e s i n m o s t
o r g a n i z a t i o n s . T h e e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n s t u d i e s d o n o t
a d d r e s s s i tu a t i o n s i n w h i c h t h e i n d i v i d u a l s u p p r e s s e s
o n e e m o t i o n a n d s i m u l t a n e o u s l y e x p r e s s e s a d i f fe r e n t
e m o t i o n ( i. e. , a c u s to m e r s e r v i ce e m p l o y e e m a y n e e d
t o i n h i b i t a n g e r a n d s m i l e a t a d i f f i c u l t c u s t o m e r ) .
L i k e w i s e , s t u d i e s a r e n o t t e s t i n g t h e i m p a c t o f
e n h a n c i n g o r e n l a r g i n g f e l t e m o t i o n s i n o r d e r t o m e e t
the d i sp l ay ru l e s o f t he j ob . F ina l l y , t he f ac t t ha t
e m p l o y e e s a r e p a i d f o r t h e i r e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n m a y
a f f e c t i n d i v i d u a l s d i f f e r e n t l y t h an w h e n t h e r e g u l a t i o n
i s f o r a l a b s t u d y o r t h e s a k e o f s o c i a l n o r m s . T h e s e
s i t ua t i ons s t i l l need t o be s t ud i ed i n l ab and f i e ld
se t t i ngs .
A M o d e l o f E m o t i o n a l L a b o r
T h e p r o c e s s o f r e o r g a n i z i n g a n d i n t e g r a t i n g t h e
p r e v i o u s m o d e l s o f e m o t i o n a l l a b o r a r o u n d t h e
w o r k i n g d e f i n i t i o n a n d u t i l i z i n g t h e g e n e r a l e m o t i o n
r e g u l a t i o n t h e o r y p r o v i d e s a c o n c e p t u a l m o d e l o f
e m o t i o n a l l a b o r ( s e e F i g u r e 1 ) . A n t e c e d e n t s o f
e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n a r e t h e s i t u a t i o n a l v a r i a b l e s , a s
s t a te d b y G r o s s ( 1 9 9 8 b ) . I n t h e c o n t e x t o f e m o t i o n a l
l a b or , t h e s i t u a ti o n a l v a r i a b l e s i n c l u d e t h e e m p l o y e e ' s
i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h c u s t o m e r s . D r a w i n g o n p r e v i o u s
e m o t i o n a l l a b o r s t u d i e s , t h e v a r i a b l e s d e s c r i b i n g t h e
n a t u r e o f c u s t o m e r c o n t a c t a n d t h e o r g a n i z a t i o n ' s
e m o t i o n d i s p l a y r u l e s s h o u l d c o n t r i b u t e t o t h e
e m o t i o n a l l a b o r p r o c e s s ( H o c h s c h i l d , 1 9 8 3 ; M o r r i s &
F e l d m a n , 1 9 9 6 ) . T h e e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n l i t e r a t u r e ,
i n t e g r a te d w i t h t h e e m o t i o n a l l a b o r t h e o r i e s , s u p p o r ts
Situational Cu es
ln te rac f ionExpec ta t ions
.Frequency
.Dura t ion
Variety
. D i s p l a y m l e s
Emo tional Events
,Positive events
Negative events
Emotion R egulation Process
m o t i o n a l L a b o r
Deep Acting: M odi fy Fee l ings
Attentional deployment
Cognit ive chan ge
Surface Act ing : Modi fy Express ions
Response modula t ion
Long Term Consequences
Individual W ell-Being
eBurnout
Job satisfaction
Organizational W ell-Being
,Performance
Withdrawal behavior
Individual Factors
,Gender
-Emotional expressivity
Emotional ntelligence
Affectivity NA/PA)
\
Organizational Factors
Job autonomy
Supervisor support
Cow orker support
Figure 1 The proposed conceptual framework o f emotion regulation performed in the work
setting. N A = negative affect; PA = positive affect.
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
8/16
102 GRANDEY
the existence of several means of performing emotion
management in work settings. Two such methods,
called deep acting and surface acting in the emotion
labor literature, can be understood more broadly as
ways of regulating feelings or manipulating expres-
sion. Based on the emotion regulat ion lab studies and
emotional labor field studies, the effortful processes
of surface acting and deep acting may be related to
employee stress and health as well as organizational
well-being. See Figure 1 for the proposed model. The
next sections propose more specifically the previous
research on and propositions regarding the anteced-
ents and consequences of emotional labor.
Situational ntecedents of Emotional Labor
As seen in the emotion regulation literature, the
situation acts as a cue from which emotions may
result. In the customer service setting, the salient
situation is the interaction with customers and the
expectations of the organization. This can be
measured as both chronic expectations of the
employee's interactions with customers and acute
events that create an emotional response. Both the
chronic and the acute situational factors may impact
the emotion regulation needed.
Customer Interaction Expectations
As Hochschild (1983) stated, certain job character-
istics may demand higher levels of emotional labor
from employees. One characteristic is the nature of
interaction with customers, in particular, the fre-
quency of face or voice contact. To this, Morris and
Feldman (1996) added the characteristics of the
duration of interactions and variety of emotional
expression. Hochschild's other proposed characteris-
tics of emotional labor jobs are that the organization
expects and controls the emotional expression of the
employee. This characteristic can be seen in percep-
tions of display rules--how much the employees
perceive that certain emotional expressions are part of
the job. These work role characteristics can be
thought of as ongoing situations to which employees
respond with emotion regulation.
Different work roles hold different expectations for
the employee when interacting with customers. Job
roles may differ in the frequency that employees are
expected to interact with customers. A receptionist at
a small legal firm may welcome customers once an
hour, but a cashier at a grocery store may meet 10
customers an hour. Another difference in interactions
is the duration demand placed on employees. A
salesclerk in a clothing store may work with a
customer for hours, whereas a convenience store
clerk may only interact with each customer for 5
minutes. The work role demands of frequency and
duration are situational factors that may increase the
likelihood that an employee must fake expressions or
modify feelings. Thus, such factors are proposed as
antecedents of emotional labor. The relationships
found between customer interaction expectations and
emotional labor have provided mixed support.
Nonsignificant correlations were found for frequency
of interaction and duration with dissonance (Morris
Feldman, 1997), and between frequency of interac-
tions and surface or deep acting (Grandey, 1999). In
another study, frequency had significant positive
relationships with surface acting and deep acting
(Brotheridge Lee, 1998), although duration was not
related to surface or deep acting.
A few researchers have explored the different
emotional displays required by jobs. Three types of
emotional work requirements have been proposed
and tested: integrative, differentiating, and masking
(Jones Best, 1995; Wharton Erickson, 1993).
Front-line service employees are generally expected
to express integrative emotions such as happiness and
sympathy. Other job types, such as bill collectors or
bouncers, are expected to portray differentiating
emotions such as fear or anger (Hochshild, 1979;
Sutton, 1991). The third type is descriptive of jobs in
which controlling emotions are required, such as
therapists or judges. In this article, I focus on those in
the first group, who are expected to express
integrative emotions and suppress differentiating
emotions.
Those expectations are controlled by the display
rules of the organization, which may be informal
norms or formal processes (Hochschild, 1983). As
stated earlier, training and performance appraisal
materials may directly request emotional labor. If
employees report that certain emotions are expected
by the organization, then that individual may engage
in more emotional labor to meet the expectations.
With samples of part- and full- time student workers,
Brotheridge and Lee (1998) found significant correla-
tions for the perception of emotion display rules with
surface acting and deep acting. Others have found a
relationship between display rules and emotional
effort (Kruml Geddes, 1998) and display rules and
deep acting (Grandey, 1999). Thus, it can be proposed
that perceiving that the organization expects certain
emotion displays will lead to more management of
emotion by employees.
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
9/16
SPE CIAL SE CT ION: E MO T ION RE GUL AT ION IN T HE WO RKPL A CE 103
E m o t i o n a l E v e n t s
A l t h o u g h t h e w o r k s e t t i n g m a y c r e a t e a c h r o n i c
n e e d t o r e g u l a t e e m o t i o n s , t h e a c u t e e v e n t s a t w o r k
h a v e a n i m m e d i a t e i m p a c t o n a n e m p l o y e e ' s e m o -
t io n s . A s s u g g e s t e d b y W e i s s a n d C r o p a n z a n o ( 1 9 9 6 ) ,
e m o t i o n a l e v e n t s at w o r k m a y h e l p e x p l a i n e m p l o y e e
a t t i t u d e s a n d b e h a v i o r . A n e m o t i o n a l e v e n t m a y l e a d
t o m o r e e m o t i o n a l r e g u l a t i o n w h e n t h a t e v e n t r e s u l t s
i n e m o t i o n s t h a t a r e d i s c r e p a n t f r o m t h e o r g a n i z a -
t i o n a l d i s p l a y r u l e s . T h e e v e n t i s a p p r a i s e d f o r i t s
p o s i t i v e o r n e g a t i v e i n f l u e n c e o n t h e p e r s o n ' s
w e l l - b e i n g . I n p a r t ic u l a r , i f t h e e v e n t i n t e r f e r e s w i t h
t h e e m p l o y e e s ' g o a l s , o n e o f w h i c h i s t o e x p r e s s a n d
i n d u c e p o s i t i v e e m o t i o n s , t h e e v e n t w i l l b e a p p r a i s e d
neg a t ive ly (Fr i j da , 1986 ; L aza ru s , 1991) . In o the r
w o r d s , t h e e v e n t m a y b e s e e n a s s t re s s f u l. S u c h e v e n t s
m a y i n v o l v e a c u s t o m e r a n g r i l y b l a m i n g t h e e m -
p l o y e e f o r a p r o d u c t m a l f u n c t i o n , o r l e a r n i n g t h a t a
f a m i l y m e m b e r h a s b e c o m e s i c k . I n s u c h c a s e s , t h e
e m p l o y e e e x p e r i e n c e s a n e v e n t t h a t r e q u i r e s e m o t i o n
r e g u l a t i o n t o m a i n t a i n t h e a p p r o p r i a t e a p p e a r a n c e a t
w o r k . O n t h e o t h e r h a n d , i f th e e v e n t c re a t e s a
p o s i t i v e e m o t i o n ( s u c h a h e a r i n g a b o u t a r a i s e o r
g e t t i n g a c c e p t e d t o g r a d u a t e s c h o o l ) , t h e n t h a t m a y
h e l p m e e t d i s p l a y r u l e s . I n t h i s c a s e , l e s s e m o t i o n
r e g u l a t i o n w o u l d b e n e c e s s a r y .
B a i l e y ( 1 9 9 6 ) o b t a i n e d d e s c r i p t i o n s f r o m e m p l o y -
e e s a b o u t h o w t h e y c o p e d w i t h d i f f i c u l t c u s t o m e r s ,
a g e n e r a l t y p e o f w o r k e v e n t . T w e n t y - t w o o u t o f 4 9
r e s p o n d e n t s d e s c r i b e d a n i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h c u s t o m e r s
w h e r e t h e c u s t o m e r w a s t o o d e m a n d i n g o r a n g r y
a b o u t a n o r g a n i z a t i o n a l f a c t o r . T h e i r r e s p o n s e s
s u p p o r t e d t h e i d e a th a t s u c h i n t e r a c ti o n s m a y i n c r e a s e
e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n a t w o r k . R e s p o n s e s t o d i f f i c u l t
c u s t o m e r s i n c l u d e d l e a v i n g t h e w o r k f l o o r ( s i t u a t i o n
m o d i f i c a t i o n ) , t h in k i n g o f s o m e t h i n g f u n n y ( a t t e n t io n
d e p l o y m e n t ), r e a l iz i n g s o m e p e o p l e a r e n e v e r h a p p y
n o m a t t e r w h a t ( c o g n i t i v e c h a n g e ) , a n d t r y i n g t o s ta y
c a l m , t a k i n g d e e p b r e a t h s ( r e s p o n s e m o d u l a t i o n ) .
T h e s e q u a l i t a t iv e f in d i n g s a r e s u p p o r t i v e o f h o w w o r k
e v e n t s m a y c r e a t e m o r e e m o t i o n a l l a b o r , a n d h o w
a n t e c e d e n t - f o c u s e d o r r e s p o n s e - f o c u s e d t a c t i cs m a y
b e u s e d b y e m p l o y e e s t o r e g u l a t e e m o t i o n s f o r
o r g a n i z a t i o n a l g o a l s .
H i g h e r f r e q u e n c y o f n e g a t i v e e v e n t s m a y l e a d t o
m o r e e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n , a n d t h u s m o r e s t r e s s .
A c r o s s t h e 4 9 e m p l o y e e s w i t h d i f f e r e n t t y p e s o f j o b s ,
e m p l o y e e s o n a v e r a g e r e p o r t e d t h a t t h e y d e a l t w i t h
d i f f i c u l t c u s t o m e r s o n c e o r t w i c e a d a y ( B a i le y ,
1 9 9 6 ). T h i s s u g g e s t s t h a t o n e t y p e o f e m o t i o n a l e v e n t
m a y h a p p e n f a i r l y o f t e n . O t h e r e m o t i o n e v e n t s m a y
o c c u r a t w o r k a s w e l l , s u c h a s t h e e q u i p m e n t n o t
w o r k i n g o r a p e r s o n a l i s s u e a r i s in g . T h e s o u r c e o f t h e
a f f e c t i v e e v e n t s m a y b e t h e c u s t o m e r , c o w o r k e r s ,
s u p e r v i s o r , o r p e r s o n a l s i tu a t io n s . A f f e c t i v e e v e n t s
t h a t i n t e r f e r e w i t h e m o t i o n d i s p l a y r u l e s m a y b e a
v e r y s a l i e n t p a r t o f w o r k l i f e a n d s h o u l d b e
c o n s i d e r e d i n e m o t i o n a l l a b o r s t u d i e s . P r o v i d e d t h a t
t h e e v e n t s i n d u c e e m o t i o n s t h a t a r e d i s c r e p a n t f r o m
d i s p l a y r u l e s , m o r e e v e n t s s h o u l d r e s u l t i n m o r e e f f o r t
t o re g u l a t e e m o t i o n s , a n d s o s h o u l d h a v e a c u m u l a t i v e
e f f e c t o n s t r e s s a n d w e l l - b e i n g . T h e s o u r c e o f e v e n t
m a y a l s o i m p a c t h o w m u c h r e g u l a t i o n i s p e r f o r m e d ,
D i s p l a y r u l e s m a y b e m o r e e x p l i c i t f o r i n t e r a c t i o n s
w i t h c u s t o m e r s , r a t h e r t h a n e m p l o y e e s . T h u s , w h e n
t h e s o u r c e o f t h e e v e n t i s a c o w o r k e r , l e s s e m o t i o n
r e g u l a t i o n m a y b e n e e d e d .
T h i s p r o p o s i t i o n m a y b e e x p l o r e d v i a d i a r y s tu d i e s
i n w h i c h e m p l o y e e s d e s c r i b e e v e n t s a n d h o w t h e y
r e s p o n d e d t o t h e m i n t h e im m e d i a t e c o n t e x t , a n d t h e n
r e l a t e t h o s e e v e n t s t o o v e r a l l e m o t i o n a l l a b o r a n d
s t r e ss . Obse rva t i ona l s t ud i e s and l ab s t ud i e s m ay a l so
h e l p e x p l o r e t h i s i d e a o f e m o t i o n a l e v e n t s i m p a c t i n g
e m o t i o n a l l a b o r . U n d e r s t a n d i n g t h e t y p e s o f e v e n t s
a n d h o w f r e q u e n t l y t h e y o c c u r m a y h e l p o r g a n i z a -
t i o n s t o a d j u s t t h e ir w o r k p r o c e s s e s o r t o d e s i g n b e t t e r
t r a in ing fo r dea l i ng wi th such s i t ua t i ons .
S t r e s s a n d W e l l B e i n g a s O u t c o m e s
o f E m o t io n a l L a b o r
T h e p r e c e d i n g s e c t i o n p r o p o s e d t h a t t h e o r g a n i z a -
t i ona l expec t a t i ons ac t a s a s i t ua t i ona l cue fo r
e m p l o y e e s . T h e o r g a n i z a t i o n ' s d e m a n d f o r c e r t a in
e m o t i o n a l e x p r e s s i o n s s h o u l d r e s u l t i n m o r e e m o t i o n
r e g u l a t i o n b y t h e e m p l o y e e , o r e m o t i o n a l l a b o r . A s
d i s c u s s e d e a r l i e r, t h e s e m e t h o d s o f e m o t i o n a l l a b o r,
s u r f a c e a n d d e e p a c t in g , r e q u i r e a l e v e l o f e f f o r t b y
t h e i n d iv i d u a l . T h e a m o u n t o f e m o t i o n a l l a b o r s h o u l d
r e l a t e t o s t r e s s d u e t o t h e p h y s i o l o g i c a l d e m a n d s o f
em ot ion r egu l a t i on (Gross , 1998a , 1998b ; L aza rus ,
1 9 9 1 ) . H o w e v e r , s u r f a c e a n d d e e p a c t i n g s h o u l d
a f f e c t c u s t o m e r s e r v i c e p e r f o r m a n c e , b e c a u s e t h e y a r e
w a y s o f r e g u l a t in g e m o t i o n s i n o r d e r to i n t e ra c t w i t h
c u s t o m e r s w i t h p o s i t i v e e x p r e s s i o n s . T h e r e a r e o t h e r
o r g a n i z a t i o n a l o u t c o m e s , t h o u g h , t h a t m a y b e d e t r i -
m e n t a l l y a f f e c t e d b y t h i s l a b o r . T h e f o l l o w i n g
s e c t i o n s r e v i e w t h e t h e o r e t ic a l a n d e m p i r i c a l s u p p o r t
f o r r e l a t io n s h i p s b e t w e e n e m o t i o n a l l a b o r a n d v a r i o u s
w e l l - b e i n g o u t c o m e s .
B u r n o u t
B u r n o u t i s a s t r e s s o u t c o m e t y p i c a l l y f o u n d i n
e m p l o y e e s i n t h e h e l p i n g i n d u s t r i e s . B u r n o u t o c c u r s
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
10/16
104 GRANDEY
when an employee becomes overly emotionally
involved in interactions with customers and has little
way to replenish those emotional resources being
spent (Jackson, Schwab, & Schuler, 1986). The signs
of burnout are emotional exhaustion, depersonaliza-
tion, and reduced personal accomplishment (Cordes
& Dougherty, 1993; Maslach, 1982). When a
situation induces repeated emotional responses that
the employee must regulate, the employee may
experience emotional exhaustion, or energy depletion
and fatigue. To cope with this feeling, employees may
detach from the customers by objectifying or
depersonalizing them. This may lead to feeling
negatively about themselves and their work, to the
point where they experience a diminished sense of
personal accomplishment (Cordes & Dougherty,
1993). Other researchers have associated burnout
with important organizational outcomes like perfor-
mance and turnover (Singh, Goolsby, & Rhoads,
1994; Wright & Cropanzano, 1998). If emotional
labor is related to burnout, it also may contribute to a
host of other organizat ional outcomes.
The research supports the prediction that emotional
labor will relate to bumout. Gross and Levenson
(1997) discussed the physiological effort demanded
to inhibit emotions from being expressed in a lab
study. Several studies have assessed the relationship
of emotional labor with emotional exhaustion in
employees. Emotional dissonance has been related to
emotional exhaustion (Abraham, 1998; Morris &
Feldman, 1997). Surface acting was related to
emotional exhaustion in another study, beyond deep
acting and dissonance (Brotheridge & Lee, 1998).
Thus, there is support for the relationship of
emotional exhaustion to managing emotions at work.
There seemed to be less empirical support for
emotional labor's relationship to the other burnout
dimensions. It is expected that emotional labor will
have a similarly detrimental relationship with deper-
sonalization and personal accomplishment. The more
employees need to effortfully express and suppress
emotional responses at work, the more they may
choose to depersonalize customers. This may be a
way of dis tancing themselves from the stress of the
emotional expenditure; if they are detached when
interacting with customers, their potentially emotion-
producing reactions will matter less (Hochschild,
1983). One study of police officers found that when
officers are expected to suppress their reactions to
tragic events, this suppression may result in less
empathy and connection with citizens (Pogrebin &
Poole, 1995). If an employee feels that meeting
emotion demands at work requires a lot of effort and
feels detached from customers, then that employee may
also feel a lowered sense of personal accomplishment.
J ob Sa t i s f ac t i on
Job satisfaction is a measure of the employee's
evaluation of the job and has often been used as a
proxy for employee well-being at work. Some
researchers propose that being required to be friendly
to customers may make a monotonous job more fun,
or may allow self-expression that is enjoyable to
employees (Ashforth & Humphrey, 1993; Tolich,
1993). Others have suggested that emotional labor
stifles personal expression and as such is unpleasant
(Hochschild, 1983; VanMaanen & Kunda, 1989). The
empirical research on the relationship between
managing emotions at work and job satisfaction has
been contradictory. This contradiction may be due to
the use of different definitions of emotional labor.
Expressions of emotions may be positively related to
job satisfaction, as suggested by the facial feedback
hypothesis (Adelmann & Zajonc, 1989), but the
regulation to achieve that expression may be nega-
tively related to satisfaction.
The available data support this difference, although
not with surface acting directly. Two studies sup-
ported that the experience of emotional dissonance
(which is conceptually similar to surface acting) was
negatively related to job satisfaction (Abraham, 1998;
Morris & Feldman, 1997). Rutter and Fielding (1988)
reported that suppressing true emotions (surface
acting) was a source of stress for prison officers, and
that such suppression related to lowered job satisfac-
tion. Adelmann (1995) reported that the table servers
who expressed real smiles at work, and didn't feel
false, had more job satisfaction than those who
reported faking emotions. There seems to be less
empirical support for the relationship of deep acting
with job satisfaction. Based on Hochschild 's (1983)
work, there should be a negative relationship. Her
argument was that working to manage something as
personal as emotions for organizational purposes
would he inherently unsatisfying. In general, those
who report high levels of emotion regulation with
customers may be less satisfied with their jobs.
W o r k e h a v i o r s a s O u t c o m e s
o f E m o t io n a l L a b o r
C u s t o m e r S e r v i c e P e r f o r m a n c e
In the service industry, managing emotions (show-
ing happiness and empathy, not fear or anger) is an
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
11/16
SPECIAL SECTION: EMOTION REGULATION N THE WORKPLACE 105
important facet of maintaining loyal customers and
repeat business (Albrecht & Zemke, 1985; Hochs-
child, 1983; Schneider & Bowen, 1985). Because
emotion regulation may be performed in different
ways, it is possible that some methods are more
effective than others and may thus impact perfor-
mance on the job. As a means of presenting a positive
image of the organization and inducing the appropri-
ate feelings in customers, managing emotions may
result in good customer service performance (Ash-
forth & Humphrey, 1993). Emotional expression such
as smiles and friendly comments can lead to good
work performance as measured by tips for table
servers (Adelmann, 1995; Tidd & Lockhard, 1978).
Pugh (1998) found a positive relationship between
emotional displays of bank tellers and customer
satisfaction. These studies suggest that positive
emotional expressions will result in higher customer
service performance.
However, the personal effort of producing those
expressions may tell a different story. Emotion
regulat ion researchers find that emotion suppression
and exaggeration may impair cognitive performance
(Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Muraven, & Tice, 1998;
Richards & Gross, 1999). Little is known about how
an employees' method of regulating emotions is
related to customer service performance. Several
authors have mentioned the importance of emotional
displays being seen as genuine in service settings
(Ashforth & Humphrey, 1993; Hochschild, 1983;
Rafaeli & Sutton, 1987). Emotional expressions that
are perceived as insincere may negatively impact
customer service (Grove & Fisk, 1989; Rafaeli &
Sutton, 1987). Emotion research has found that when
people fake emotions, or are surface acting, there
seems to be leakage so that observers can detect
the deception (Ekman & Friesen, 196 9). This
suggests that surface acting should be negatively
related to service performance. However, deep acting,
or antecedent-focused emotion regulation, convinces
employees that they really feel the way they are trying
to express (Gross, 1998a). Although this process is
still effortful, it may lead to an expression that is
perceived as more genuine than when an employee
surface acts. Thus, deep acting may be positively
related to customer service.
W i t h d r a w a l B e h a v i o r s
it is vital to understand the impact of emotional labor.
In customer service jobs, it is essential that employees
be available to customers (Parasuraman et al., 1985).
If employees leave the work floor to cope with their
emotions, this may diminish the impression the
customer has of the organization. Leaving the work
floor or talking to coworkers were stated ways of
coping with difficult customers for 36 out of 49
respondents in a variety of jobs (Bailey, 1996).
In the long run, employees may also decide to leave
the organization. Emotional labor levels may predict
those who desire to leave the organization. Those who
need to engage in high levels of surface acting may be
more inclined to desire a different job. In fact, the
need to regulate emotions regularly at work may act
as a signal to the employee that this environment is
not a good match for the individual (Edwards, 1991;
Schwarz & Clore, 1983). The employee may engage
in the antecedent-focused emotion regulation tech-
nique of situation selection (Gross, 1998b) and select
a different organizational setting for employment. On
the basis of the burnout literature, it is likely that
working in jobs that demand high levels of emotional
regulation may result in withdrawal behaviors (Cordes
& Dougherty, 1993; Maslach & Pines, 1977; Singh et
al., 1994).
P e r s o n a l a n d O r g a n i z a ti o n a l F a c t o r s
f fe c t in g E m o t i o n a l L a b o r
In this article, I have proposed a linear process
between organizational antecedents, emotional labor,
and the well-being of the employee and the
organization. Looking at previous emotion research,
it is clear that this is a simplified process. As
suggested by Ashforth and Humphrey (1993), there
are many other variables that may impact customer
service besides the employee's emotional labor
process. The emotion regulation works have sug-
gested some factors but not specifically work-
oriented variables. For comprehensive understanding
of emotional labor, individual differences and organi-
zational factors should be taken into account in future
research.
P e r s o n a l C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s R e l a t e d
t o E m o t i o n a l L a b o r
Emotion regulation results in physiological arousal
that, over the long run, may affect withdrawal
behaviors such as leaving the work floor, absentee-
ism, and turnover. These are outcomes that are of
particular concern to customer service jobs, and thus
There are many individual differences that may be
related to emotional labor. Emotional labor research-
ers need to integrate the personality variables into the
emotional labor framework, in order to understand
the concept of emotional labor more clearly. Are
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
12/16
106 GRANDEY
c e r t a i n t y p e s o f p e o p l e b e t t e r a t r e g u l a t i n g t h e i r
e m o t i o n s ? A r e o t h e r t y p e s o f p e o p l e b e t t e r a t h a n d l i n g
d i f f i c u l t s i t u a t i o n s w i t h o u t b e c o m i n g s t r e s s e d ? I s
e m o t i o n a l l a b o r i n g t h r o u g h s u r f a c e a n d d e e p a c t in g a
t r a i n a b l e p r o c e s s ? A f e w r e l a t e d c o n c e p t s a r e b r i e f l y
m e n t i o n e d i n o r d e r t o s u g g e s t d i r e c ti o n s f o r f u t u re
resea rch .
Gender . G e n d e r d i f f e r e n c e s a r e o f t e n a t o p i c o f
i n t e r e s t , a n d t h e a r e a o f e m o t i o n a l l a b o r i s n o
e x c e p t i o n . H o c h s c h i l d ( 1 9 8 3 ) p o i n t e d o u t t h a t t h e
m a j o r i t y o f s er v ic e j o b s a r e p e r f o r m e d b y w o m e n , a n d
a s s u c h g e n d e r b e c o m e s a n i s s u e f o r e m o t i o n a l l a bo r .
W h a r t o n a n d E r i c k s o n ( 1 9 9 3 ) a l s o d i s c u s s e d h o w
w o m e n a r e m o r e l i k e ly to m a n a g e e m o t i o n s a t w o r k
a s w e l l as a t h o m e . I f w o m e n e n g a g e i n m o r e e m o t i o n
m a n a g e m e n t s i tu a t i o n s , p e r h a p s t h e y a r e b e t t e r a t
m a n a g i n g e m o t i o n s ( s o p e r f o rm a n c e w o u l d b e
b e t t e r ) , b u t t h e y w o u l d b e e n g a g i n g i n m o r e
s u p p r e s s i o n o f t r u e f e e l i n g s ( s o s t r e s s w o u l d b e
h i g h e r) . K r u m l a n d G e d d e s ( 1 9 9 8 ) f o u n d a r e l a ti o n -
s h i p b e t w e e n g e n d e r a n d e m o t i o n a l d i s s o n a n c e , i n
t h a t w o m e n w e r e m o r e l i k e ly to r e p o r t f e e li n g
d i f f e r e n t l y th a n t h e y e x p r e s s e d . I t i s u n c l e a r i f t h i s
m e a n s t h a t m e n a r e s h o w i n g e m o t i o n s t h a t a r e
i n a p p r o p r i a t e f o r t h e j o b o r s i m p l y n o t f e e l i n g
d i s c r e p a n t e m o t i o n s . I n l i n e w i t h t h e f i r s t p o i n t , o n e
s t u d y s u g g e s te d t h a t m e n a n d w o m e n h a v e d i f f e re n t
m o t i v e s f o r r e g u l a t i n g e m o t i o n s , i n t h a t w o m e n a r e
m o r e c o n c e r n e d w i t h g e t t in g a l o n g , w h e r e a s m e n a r e
m o r e m o t i v a t e d t o s t a y i n c o n t r o l a n d e x p r e s s
p o w e r f u l e m o t i o n s s u c h a s a n g e r o r p r id e ( T i m m e r s ,
F i s c h e r , & M a n s t e a d , 1 9 9 8 ) . H o w e v e r , i n t h e
c u s t o m e r s e r v ic e s e t ti n g , th i s m o t i v e m a y n o t w o r k i n
m e n ' s f a v o r . I t i s p o s s i b l e t h a t i n s e r v i c e s e t ti n g s , m e n
m a y n e e d m o r e t r a i n in g to m a n a g e e m o t i o n s w h e n
d e a l i n g w i t h c u s t o m e r s .
E m ot i ona l e x pr e s s i v i t y . B e y o n d d e m o g r a p h i c
v a r i a b l e s , t h e r e a r e a w i d e v a r i e t y o f r e l a t e d
e m o t i o n v a r i a b le s t h a t h a v e b e e n e x p l o r e d in
c l i n i c a l , d e v e l o p m e n t a l , o r o r g a n i z a t i o n a l r e s e a r c h .
E m o t i o n a l e x p r e s s i v i ty a s a p e r s o n a l i t y c h a r a c te r i s ti c
h a s b e e n r e c e i v i n g a t t e n t i o n l a te l y a s a p r e d i c t o r o f
h e a l th a n d j o b p e r f o r m a n c e ( A r v e y e t a l. , 1 9 9 8 ; K i n g
& E m m o n s , 1 9 9 0 ; K r i n g , S m i t h , & N e a l e , 1 9 9 4 ) .
R e c e n t l y , s c a l e s o f e m o t i o n a l e x p r e s s i v i t y h a v e b e e n
t e s te d b y G r o s s a n d J o h n ( 1 9 9 8 ) a n d S t e e l, A r v e y , a n d
K y l l o n e n (1 9 9 9 ) . T h e s e s c a l es , s u c h a s P o s i ti v e
E x p r e s s iv i t y , I m p u l s e I n t e n s i ty , a n d M a s k i n g , s e e m
v e r y r e l a t e d t o t h e i d e a s o f s u r f a c e a c t i n g a n d d e e p
a c t i n g p r e s e n t e d e a r l i e r . I t i s p o s s i b l e t h a t p e r s o n s
h i g h i n p o s i t iv e e x p r e s si v i ty , f o r e x a m p l e , w o u l d b e
s k i l l e d a t m e e t i n g o r g a n i z a t i o n a l d i s p l a y r u l e s . T h u s ,
s u c h a n i n d i v i d u a l sh o u l d r e p o r t l o w e r l e v e ls o f
e m o t i o n a l l a b o r a n d p e r f o r m b e t t e r i n s e r v ic e jo b s .
E x p r e s s i v i t y i s a l s o r e l a t e d t o g e n d e r , w i t h w o m e n
r e p o r t i n g h i g h e r l e v e l s o f e m o t i o n a l e x p r e s s i v i t y
( K i n g & E m m o n s , 1 9 9 0 ; R a f a e l i & S u t t o n , 1 9 8 9 ).
Emotional intel l igence.
A n o t h e r r e l a t e d c o n c e p t
t h a t h a s b e e n r e c e i v i n g a l o t o f a t t e n t i o n r e c e n t l y i s
e m o t i o n a l in t e l l ig e n c e ( G o l e m a n , 1 9 9 5 ; M a y e r &
S a l o v e y , 1 9 9 5 ) . E m o t i o n a l i n t e l l i g e n c e i s r e fe r r e d t o
a s t h e a b i l i ty t o r e c o g n i z e a n d u s e e m o t i o n a l
i n f o r m a t i o n i n s o c i a l i n t e r a c t i o n s . E f f e c t i v e a f f e c t
r e g u l a t i o n i s o n e o f t h e s i g n s o f s t r o n g e m o t i o n a l
i n t e l l i g e n c e ( S a l o v e y , H s e e , & M a y e r , 1 9 9 3 ) . T h o s e
w i t h h i g h e m o t i o n a l i n t e l l i g e n c e a r e s k i l l e d a t
h a n d l i n g s o c i a l e n c o u n t e r s , a n d i n f a c t m a y m a k e
o t h e r p e o p l e f e e l g o o d a b o u t t h e m s e l v e s a s w e l l
( G o l e m a n , 1 9 9 5 ) . T h i s i s a d e s i r e d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c i n
s e r v i c e e n c o u n t e r s . T h e T r a i t M e t a - M o o d S c a l e
( S a l o v e y e t a l . , 1 9 9 5 ) w a s d e s i g n e d t o c o n s i d e r th e
a m o u n t o f a t t e n t i o n th a t p e o p l e p a y t o t h e i r e m o t i o n s
a n d t h e m o d i f i c at i o n o f e m o t i o n s . U n f o r t u n a t e ly , th e
m e a s u r e m e n t o f t h i s c o n s t r u c t h a s h a d d i f f i c u l t y . I n
p a r t i c u l a r , o n e s t u d y f o u n d t h a t t h i s f a c t o r o f
e m o t i o n a l i n t e l l i g e n c e w a s e x t r e m e l y u n r e l i a b l e
( D a v i e s , S t a n k o v , & R o b e r t s , 1 9 9 8 ) . N e w m o d i f i c a -
t i o n s o f t h is s c a l e a r e b e g i n n i n g to e m e r g e ( M a y e r ,
C a r u s o , & S a l o v ey , i n p re s s ) a n d s h o u l d b e u s e d i n
a n y f u t u r e s t u d i e s t h a t t e s t h o w e m o t i o n a l l a b o r a n d
e m o t i o n a l i n t e ll i g e n c e c a n i n f o r m e a c h o t he r .
Self monitoring. S e l f - m o n i t o r i n g r e f e r s t o t h e
e x t e n t t h a t p e o p l e m o n i t o r th e i r s e l f - p r e s e n t a t i o n s a n d
c o n t r o l t h e i r e x p r e s s i v e b e h a v i o r ( S n y d e r , 1 9 7 4 ) .
H i g h s e l f -m o n i t o r s ar e m o r e a w a r e o f t h e e m o t i o n a l
c u e s o f o t h e r s a n d a r e m o r e w i l l i n g a n d a b l e t o c h a n g e
the i r own emo t iona l expres sion to f i t t he s i tua t ion than
l o w s e l f- m o n i t o r s . L o w s e l f- m o n i t o r s t e n d t o r e m a i n
t r u e t o t h e i r i n t e r n a l f e e l i n g s . S e l f - m o n i t o r i n g
m a k e s t h e o r e t ic a l s e n s e a s a n i n f l u e n t i a l c h a r a c t e r i s ti c
o n e m o t i o n a l l a b o r. I n j o b s w h e r e e m o t i o n a l l a b o r i s
r e q u i r e d , l o w s e l f - m o n i t o r s s h o u l d h a v e a m o r e
d i f f i c u lt t i m e f o l l o w i n g d i s p l a y r u l e s . I f t h e y w a n t t o
k e e p t h e i r j o b s , t h e y n e e d t o a d h e r e t o e m o t i o n a l
d i s p l a y r u l e s , b u t t h e y m a y b e l e s s a t e a s e s u p p r e s s i n g
t h e i r tr u e f e e l i n g s t h a n a h i g h s e l f - m o n i t o r . T h u s , l o w
s e l f -m o n i t o r s m a y r e p o r t h i g h e r l e v e ls o f e m o t i o n a l
l a b o r a n d h i g h e r l e v e l s o f s t r e s s i n c u s t o m e r s e r v i c e
j o b s . S t u d i e s h a v e s u g g e s t e d t h a t h i g h s e l f - m o n i t o r s
w o u l d b e l e s s re a c t iv e t o d i s s o n a n c e ( A b r a h a m , 1 9 9 8)
a n d b e t t e r a t c u s t o m e r s e r v i c e j o b s ( C a l d w e l l &
O ' R e i l l y , 1 9 8 2 ; F r i e d m a n & M i l l e r - H e r r i n g e r , 1 9 9 1 ).
W h a r t o n ( 1 9 9 3 ) f o u n d t h a t h i g h s e l f - m o n i t o r s i n
e m o t i o n a l la b o r jo b s , a s d e f i n e d b y H o c h s c h i l d ' s
( 1 9 8 3 ) t a x o n o m y , w e r e l e s s l i k e l y t o r e p o r t b u r n o u t
t h a n l o w s e l f - m o n i t o r s . R e s e a r c h n e e d s t o e x p l o r e
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
13/16
SPECIAL SECTION: EMOTION REGULATIONIN THE WORKPLACE 107
how self-monitoring relates to methods of emotion
regulation at work.
Affectivity Positive affectivity is related to enthu-
siasm and optimism, whereas negative affectivity is
related to pessimism and aversive mood states. As
stated by Weiss and Cropanzano (1996), affective
traits act as predispositions toward more or less
intense emotional responses. Thus, someone high in
negative affectivity (NA) may respond more strongly
to negative events if they occur. This means a high
NA person exerts more emotional labor to maintain
the emotional display in the face of a difficult
encounter. Affectivity has been proposed in theoreti-
cal models as a predictor of emotional labor. Morris
and Feldman (1996) suggested that positive and
negative affectivity would relate to emotional labor.
In particular, these researchers hypothesized that
when the emotion work requirements (express
positive or negative emotions) conflicted with affec-
tivity (positive or negative affect), dissonance would
occur. Some have found that positive affectivity is
generally effective in the workplace (Staw, Sutton, &
Pelled, 1994), but this research does not consider
emotional labor explicitly. Research is needed to test
these propositions and to see if high NA persons can
learn to regulate their emotions in effective ways.
O r g a n i z a t i o n a l F a c t o r s
As suggested by Ashforth and Humphrey (1993)
and Morris and Feldman (1996), and supported by the
emotion regulation literature, the environment is a
very important factor in understanding emotion
management. It is very possible that the situation in
which employees work may affect the level and type
of emotional labor in which they engage.
Autonomy Feeling a lack of control over events
has been identified as a source of life stress (Rodin,
1986) as well as job stress. Hochschild (1983)
discussed the unpleasantness of having the organiza-
tion control one's personal feeling state. A few studies
have tested the idea that job autonomy minimizes the
stress of the emotion regulation process. Wharton
(1993) found that those who reported high autonomy
had lower emotional exhaustion in both high and low
emotional labor-typed jobs. Morris and Feldman
(1996) reported that job autonomy was negatively
related to emotional dissonance and emotional
exhaustion and positively related to job satisfaction. A
recent court case with a major grocery store chain
involves emotional autonomy in particular: Customer
service employees are suing the company because
they must smile at customers even though that has led
to sexual harassment by customers. Organizat ions
who take away emotional autonomy may find
negative outcomes emerge.
Supervisor and coworker support The emotion
regulation theory proposed by Gross (1998h) dis-
cussed the envi ronment as a cue to the emotional
response that follows. Support from coworkers and
supervisors should create a positive working environ-
ment (Schneider & Bowen, 1985). An employee's
perception that he or she works in a supportive
climate has been found to relate to job satisfaction,
lowered stress, and turnover intentions, and even
higher team performance (Cropanzano, Howes,
Grandey, & Toth, 1997; Eisenberger, Cummings,
Armeli, & Lynch, 1997; Howes, Cropanzano, Grandey,
& Mohler, 1999). In customer service settings, where
positive expressions are expected, feeling positive
about the social environment may mean that less
emotional labor is necessary. One may genuinely feel
the emotions that are expected in a service environ-
ment if the interpersonal relationships are positive
and supportive. Indirectly, support may help employ-
ees cope with the stress of service jobs. Bailey (1996)
suggested that talking to other people was a method of
coping with difficult customers. The stress literature
shows fairly clearly that disclosure of emotional
events helps individuals cope with stress and buffer
against health risks (Carver, Schein, & Weintraub,
1993; Pennebaker, 1990). Social support in service
settings seems to help protect individuals from stress
(Goolsby, 1992; Pines & Aronson, 1988). Only one
known study has tested support as a moderator of
emotional labor and outcomes. Abraham (1998)
found that social support interacted with emotional
dissonance to buffer against ob dissatisfaction.
Conclus ions and Future Directions
Emotions have been a difficult topic of study for
decades: Even the definition and operationalizationof
emotion remains murky. The much newer field of
emotional labor can miss some of these growing pains
if researchers learn from these more established
emotion theories, as this article has attempted to
show. In general, several propositions could be made
based on the emotion regulation theory and the
previous emotional labor research. One, situational
settings contribute to the emotional labor engaged in
by the employees. Those who interact with customers
or clients for extended periods and who experience
emotional events in those situations are more likely to
emotionally regulate. Two, emotional labor may
result in good organizational performance, but may
have consequences for the employees' health. Specifi-
7/26/2019 Emotion Regulation in the Workplace.pdf
14/16
108 GRANDE Y
c a l ly , d e e p a c t i n g s h o u l d b e m o r e p o s i t i v e l y r e la t e d t o
s e r v i c e p e r f o r m a n c e t h a n s u r f a c e a c t i n g , b u t b o t h
s h o u l d b e r e l a t e d t o b u r n o u t , w i t h d r a w a l , a n d
n e g a t i v e w o r k a t ti tu d e s . F i n a l l y , p e r s o n a l a n d o r g a n i -
z a t i o n a l c h a ra c t e r is t i c s m a y a c t a s m a i n e f f e c t s o n t h e
l e v e l o f e m o t i o n a l l a b o r p e r f o r m e d ; f o r e x a m p l e ,
w o m e n o r t h o s e w h o a r e e m o t i o n a l l y e x p r es s i v e m a y
b e m o r e l i k e l y t o e n g a g e i n e m o t i o n a l l a b o r . T h e s e
o r g a n i z a t i o n a l a n d p e r s o n a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s m a y a l s o
a c t a s m o d e r a t o r s b y a f f e c t in g r e l a t io n s h i p s w i t h t h e
c o n s e q u e n c e s o f e m o t i o n a l l a b o r . F o r e x a m p l e , t h o s e
w h o p e r c e i v e h i g h l e v e ls o f s u p e r v i s o r s u p po r t m a y
r e p o r t h i g h l e v e l s o f e m o t i o n a l l a b o r b u t n o t b u r n o u t
because suppor t a c t s a s a bu f fe r aga ins t t he s t r e sso r s .
A s c a n b e s e e n , t h e re a r e m a n y u n k n o w n s , a n d b o t h
l ab and f i e ld r e sea rch a re needed t o t e s t t he
r e l a t io n s h i p s o u t l i n e d i n F i g u r e 1 . F o r e x a m p l e , d i a r y
s t u d i e s o f e m o t i o n a l e v e n t s w o u l d i l l u s t r a t e t h e t y p e
o f e v e n t s e m p l o y e e s r e s p o n d t o a t w o r k , a s w e l l a s a c t
a s a c o p i n g t e c h n i q u e s u g g e s t e d b y t h e e m o t i o n
regu la t i on r e sea rche r s ( i . e ., Penn ebake r , 1985 , 1990) .
L a b s t u d i e s , n o t t y p i c a l l y d o n e b y o r g a n i z a t i o n a l
r e s e a r c h e rs , c o u l d e x a m i n e t h e i m p a c t o f s u r f ac e a n d
d e e p a c t i n g p r o c e s s e s o n c u s t o m e r s . B o t h o f th e s e
t y p e s o f s t u d i e s w o u l d h a v e i m p l i c a t i o n s f o r w o r k -
p l a c e t r a i n i n g f o r e m p l o y e e s . F i e l d s t u d ie s , t y p i c a l l y
n o t u s e d b y t h e e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n r e s e a r c h e rs , c o u l d
i n c l u d e p e n - a n d - p a p e r s t u d ie s o f p e r s o n a l i t y c h a r a c -
t e r i s t i c s a n d e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n t e c h n i q u e s t o i n f o r m
s e l e c t i o n d e c i s i o n s . T h o s e p e r s o n a l i t y t y p e s w h o a r e
m o r e l i k e l y t o r e a p p r a i s e s i t u a t i o n s a n d c h a n g e
f e e l i n g s t a t e s m a y b e b e t t e r s u i t e d f o r c e r t a i n j o b s
t h a n t h o s e w h o p r e f e r t o i n h i b i t t h e i r fe e l i n g s . F i n a l ly ,
r e s e