Dynamic Image Analysis and pharmaceutical multi-particulates · Dynamic Image Analysis and...

Post on 20-Aug-2018

229 views 0 download

Transcript of Dynamic Image Analysis and pharmaceutical multi-particulates · Dynamic Image Analysis and...

Dynamic Image Analysisand pharmaceutical multi-particulates

Particle size distributionsCoat thickness and drug release

Swelling during drug release

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

TopicsWhat are multi-particulates and what is DIA?Representative samplesApplications

Raw materialsDrug layeringMeasuring coat thicknessInvestigating drug release

Future opportunities

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Multi-particulatesInert CoreDrug + BinderPolymer CoatingDrug release

Sugar Sphere Plus Drug Layer Plus Polymer Layer

Ghost After Dissolution,

Expansion Noticeable

Sugar Sphere Plus Drug Layer

Sugar Sphere

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Standard for beads Common, conceptually easy

Sizes 500,600,710,850,1000,1180,1400 µm

Sieving facts

Tolerances on sieves (e.g. 850 µm)–Mean opening 850 ± 35 µm, NMT 5% > 925 µm, max individual 970 µm

–Sieve-to-sieve differencesInfinite shaking, lengthwise passage

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Alternate PSDs

MicroscopesLabor intensive, small sample size, which dimension to measure if irregular

Dynamic Image AnalysisImage dimensions irrespective of orientationAverage is larger, conceptually and measured

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Dynamic image analysis

Screen

Light Source

Sample Collection

Vibrating Chute and Sample

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Measuring shadows

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

A typical PSD

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Particle sizes and distributions

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Raw materials, drug layering

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Zoom camera images

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

DistributionsAbsolute homogeneity – 1 particle is sufficientDegree of heterogeneity

Span from smallest to largest particleShape consistency

Typical multi-particulatesDrug layered seed cores (sugar spheres or MCC)Extruded productsHigh shear granulations

Adequate representation

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Representative measurements

Different distributionsSize of sampleMethod of samplingHow representative is the sample?Reproducibility of measurement

Data from a given sample is reproducible

Heinicke & Schwartz, Pharm Dev Tech, 9 (4), 359, 2004

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Fluid bed sampling

PSD is steady at about 15,000 particles for layered sugar spheres (10-30 g depending on D50 and density)Sample port equivalent to thiefSample port samples represent the processing

Heinicke & Schwartz, Pharm Dev Tech, 9 (4), 359, 2004

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Typical data

Applications

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Multi-particulates

Sugar Sphere Plus Drug Layer Plus Polymer Layer

Ghost After Dissolution,

Expansion Noticeable

Sugar Sphere Plus Drug Layer

Sugar Sphere

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Drug layering

Heinicke et al., Pharm Dev Tech, 10, 85, 2005

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Resolve polymer coat addition

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

These are the particles

13% 15%

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Series of coat thickness

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

900

910

920

930

940

950

960

970

980

990

D50

Mes

(um

)

0 5 10 15 20TPCW (%)

Linear Fit D50Mes (um) = 891.86135 + 4.7723849 TPCW (%) Summary of Fit RSquare 0.993486RSquare Adj 0.992183Root Mean Square Error 1.777776Mean of Response 955Observations (or Sum Wgts) 7

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Drug release

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 240 480 720 960 1200

Time (min)

% R

elea

sed

7%CW9%CW11%CW13%CW15%CW17%CW19%CW

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

TPCW and drug release

R2 = 0.9986

y = 58.608x - 99.382

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

5 10 15 20

TPCW (%)

T50

(min

)

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Coat thickness & drug release

y = 23.637x - 86.566R2 = 0.9917

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0 10 20 30 40 50

Coat Thickness (um)

T50

(min

)

T50 (min)Linear (T50 (min))

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

700

750

800

850

900

950

1000

1050

1100

D50

Mes

0 5 10 15 20TPCW

Heinicke et al., Pharm Dev Tech, 10, 85, 2005

How real is it?

Supporting evidence for meaningful data

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Effect of batch surface area

Adjust by altering core charge weightRatio of weights is ratio of area (different weights of same substrate)Normalize for TPCW and look at drug release

Effect of raw material PSD (SA) on coat thickness, a contribution to lot-to-lot variation

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Experiment with batch size

600, 650, 700, 750 and 800 g core chargesOne coating solutionSame coating solution weight additions of 425, 559, 699, 845, 998, 1158, and 1326 g to each core chargeComparison of coat thicknessComparison of drug release

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Core charge & change in D50

960

970

980

990

1000

1010

1020

1030

1040

D50

6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20Nominal CW

Linear Fit Bx ID=="600g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="650g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="700g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="750g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="800g"

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Normalize to TPCW

960

970

980

990

1000

1010

1020

1030

1040

D50

5 10 15 20TPCW

Linear Fit Bx ID=="600g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="650g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="700g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="750g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="800g"

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

TPCW and T50

100200300400500600700800900

10001100

T50

(min

)

5 10 15 20TPCW

Linear Fit Bx ID=="600g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="650g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="700g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="750g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="800g"

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Explain the single line

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Different experiments marked

100200300400500600700800900

10001100

T50

(min

)

5 10 15 20TPCW

Linear Fit Bx ID=="600g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="650g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="700g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="750g"Linear Fit Bx ID=="800g"

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Novel use of DIA

small

medium

large Low potency

High potency

Heinicke et al., Pharm Dev Tech, 10, 85, 2005

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Different SS sieve cuts

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Expt 1: Coating constant PSDsSame sized particles700 g core charge of each (separately)Same coating solution weight additions of 425, 559, 699, 845, 998, 1158, and 1326 g to each core chargeSample, measure D50 at each TPCW, plotQ: Are the lines coincident, parallel or diverging?

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Constant coat thickness

small

medium

large Low potency

High potency

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Coa

tTh

ickn

ess

(um

)

6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20TPCW

Expt 1: Slopes aren’t equal

Linear Fit Core=="15"Linear Fit Core=="45"Linear Fit Core=="64"

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

DensityD

ensi

ty

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

15% 45% 64%

Potency at Same Size

All PairsTukey-Kramer 0.05

Heinicke et al., Pharm Dev Tech, 10, 85, 2005

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Adjust for surface area

CddC 1

1

2

1

22 ρρ

=

Cx = Core Charge Weight (1 or 2)

ρx = Bulk Density of Cores

dx = Diameter of CoresHeinicke et al., Pharm Dev Tech, 10, 85, 2005

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Expt 2: Adjust Core ChargeSame sized particles636g, 700 g, 775 g sprayed separatelySame coating solution weight additions of 425, 559, 699, 845, 998, 1158, and 1326 g to each core chargeSample, measure D50 at each TPCW, plotQ: Are the lines coincident, parallel or diverging?

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Expt 2: Slopes are equal

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Coa

t Thi

ckne

ss (u

m)

6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22TPCW (%)

Linear Fit Core ID=="15"Linear Fit Core ID=="45"Linear Fit Core ID=="64"

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Investigating drug releasePolymer insolubleSwelling and stretchingCoat thickness effectsCore dependent

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Coat thickness and swelling

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Constant coat thickness

small

medium

large Low potency

High potency

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Core dependence: release & size

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 240 480 720 960

Time(min)

% R

elea

sed

Drug release in 0.1N HCl, same sized cores and same

coat thickness

Starting PSDs and ghost PSDs after drug release

Heinicke & Schwartz, Pharm Dev Tech, 12, 473, 2007

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Future opportunities for DIA

Count, mass per particle, uniformitySurrogate dissolution testSurface area of core chargeBimodal distributions Density of drug layer or coating layer as appliedApplication to other multi-particulates

G. Heinicke© Horiba Instruments Webinar, June 2009

Acknowledgements

Horiba instrumentsThe late Dr. J.B. Schwartz & USPDr. Garth Boehm and Dr. Kristin ArnoldAnchen Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Questions?