Post on 27-May-2015
description
‘Delivering School Improvement in the Real World’
Sir William Samuel Atkinson, Executive HeadteacherThe Phoenix Canberra Schools Federation
Thursday October 6th 2011
• A major report by McKinsey & Company in 2009 titled “The Economic Impact of the Achievement Gap in America’s Schools” notes that:
• If the United States had in recent years closed the gap between educational achievement levels and those of better performing nations as Finland and Korea, GDP in 2008 could have been $1.3 trillion to $2.3 trillion higher. This represents 9 to 16 percent of GDP.
The Economic Impact of the Achievement Gap in America’s Schools
2
• If the gap between low income students and the rest had similarly narrowed, GDP in 2008 would have been $400 billion to $670 billion higher
• If the gap between America’s low performing states and the rest had been similarly narrowed, GDP in 2008 would have been $425 billion to $475 billion higher
3
The Economic Impact of the Achievement Gap in America’s Schools
White City• The White City Estate is ranked within the top 5% of the most deprived
neighbourhoods nationally with regard to income level and within the 10% most deprived with regards to barriers to housing and services
• 53% of tenants are rent in arrears
• Wormholt and White City Ward has one of the highest standardised mortality rates
• Birth rate and domestic over-crowding highlight significant health problems on White City Estate
• Highest concentration of residents on Council’s Disability and Mental Registers, as well as those receiving Community Care packages to support independent living at home
4
The Mail On Sunday, March 1994
• INDEPENDENT inspectors believe that it is possibly the worst school in Britain
…..And with good reason
• A generation of inner-city children, many from poorer backgrounds have been still being – betrayed by a school, which is consistently failing to equip them for life
• This is a story of a school in despair, of a comprehensive so out of control that this week Education Secretary, John Patten, will name it as one of the worst in Britain
• It is so bad, so obviously failing its pupils, that it may become the first in this country to be taken from council control and handed to a team of experts run under directions from Westminster
5
Daily Mirror, October 1994
6
TES, October 1997
7
• 535 students on roll (11-16)
• 75%, 25% boy/girl ratio
• 60%+ free school meals
• 55% SEN
• 40-45 different languages spoken
• Vast majority of students reading on entry below chronological age
• 35% mobility
Student Make-up 1994
8
Ofsted 1994: Key Judgements
• There is little sense of coherent management and direction within the school • …. the implementation of policies and procedures is inconsistent between and
within the main areas of the school
• The school has no systematic and underpinning culture of monitoring and evaluation to inform its subsequent actions using clear, shared and agreed criteria
• There is no evident and distinctive positive ethos in the school
• Some staff display a lack of self confidence in their ability to ensure a suitable working environment
9
Ofsted 2008: Key Judgements
• “The Phoenix is a remarkable school; it continues to transform the life chances of both students and their families. It can do this because the School operates from a deeply rooted understanding, and heart-felt appreciation of the challenging circumstances that many of the students come from.”
• “Achievement at the school is outstanding. Students attain examination results in yr 11 that are broadly similar to those found nationally; because of their exceptionally low starting points, this is outstanding progress.”
• “The School is exceptionally well led.”
• Judged to be Outstanding
10
Key Drivers For Success
• Recruitment and retention of the best people
• Continuous professional development
• Clear specification of what success should look like in the classroom
• Transparent monitoring process with clear agreed success criteria
• Constructive feedback which informed follow-up discussions and further targets and agreed support
• Ownership of goals and target – critical
• Targets, benchmarks against the best (not just similar schools)11
External Challenge and Support
• Office For Standards in Education (OFSTED)
• League Tables
• London Challenge
12
What Else?
• High Expectation for all regardless of starting position
• Strong reward and discipline system
• Extensive range of extra-curricular activities
• Community engagement and empowerment