Post on 18-Dec-2015
CREDIT OF TAXES AND WITHHOLDING TAXES-CROSS BORDER ISSUES
SUSHIL LAKHANI
PROFESSOR KLAUS VOGEL APPRECIATES THE INDIAN JUDICIARY FOR DECISIONS ON INTERNATIONAL TAXATION - ESPECIALLY THE DELHI SPECIAL BENCH DECISION IN THE CASE OF NOKIA, ERICCSON AND MOTOROLA
– ECONOMIC TIMES OF 7TH APRIL 2006
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 3Sushil Lakhani
Cross Border Payments-Withholding Tax Issues
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 4Sushil Lakhani
any person responsible for paying to a non-resident or a foreign company• Non resident to non resident covered.• Payment by Branch to HO (ABN Amro Bank (280 ITR
(AT) 117)(Kol – SB)) “sum chargeable to tax (other than Salaries)”
• Capital Gains – NR to NR trf of shares??• Sec 195 vs Sec 196D?? (Int to FIIs)• Interest – whether all interest or only interest chargeable to tax
covered??• Gift??• Gross Sum vs Income element
• FTS, Royalty etc•Other than Sec 44D
Section 195 (1) – Scope of the section
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 5Sushil Lakhani
Treaty vs Act
• meaning of “Liable to Tax” – Recent
developments- Abdul Razak Meman (276 ITR 306)(AAR)
- GE Pension Trust (280 ITR 425) (AAR)
- Green Emirates Shipping and Travel (99 TTJ 988)
(Mum)
• Surcharge and Education Cess not to be included
when treaty applied .
Section 195 (1) – Scope of the section
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 6Sushil Lakhani
Deductibility of TDS borne by payer--S.40(a)(ii)??
Section 195A – Grossing up of tax
Sec 40(a) (ii)
“any sum paid on account of any rate or tax levied on the profits or gains of any business or profession or assessed at a proportion of, or otherwise on the basis of, any such profits or gains”
Incidental issuesExpenses whether disallowed u/s 40(a)(i), if TDS
partly deducted??
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 7Sushil Lakhani
Certificate by a CA for remittance:
Clause 1 – “name & address of beneficiary”
• “Beneficiary” – meaning of – “Beneficial Owner” or “Recipient”?
Clause 7– determination of a PE and profits of PE:
• Whether CA duty bound to ascertain the existence of PE?
• Determination of “attributable to PE” ?
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 8Sushil Lakhani
Certificate by a CA for remittance:
Some Issues: Consequence of difference of opinion between a CA and AO Consequence of change in the view due to an amendment or
a judicial decision or circular subsequent to issue of certificate.
Determination of any “special relation” between payer and payee.
Tax residency certificate – if not available? Tax residency certificate—not sufficient -- dual residency? Validity period of tax residency certificate / undertaking /
declaration from the payee – for a year or for single payment?
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 9Sushil Lakhani
Certificate by a CA for remittance:
Some Issues (Cont…): Whether CA certificate is an alternative to Order u/s 195(2)? “Non resident” status of the receiver – at what point of time
to be considered?• at the time of signing of agreement or• the prior financial year or• making of remittance
In absence of address in the agreement is the payer obliged to determine the status of purchaser for purchase of capital gains?
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 10Sushil Lakhani
SECTION 9(1)(i)--BUSINESS CONNECTION
Taxable only if :• relates to a source of income or asset in India; or• if “business connection” under IT Act and “PE” under
the treaty exists. Taxable only to the extent “reasonably attributable”
to operations in India. Specific exclusions – Explanation 1(b); 1(c) & 1(d) of
Section 9(1)(i) Specific inclusions – Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(i)
• treaty concept of dependent agent introduced in Act• agent need not be in India but must Act in India.
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 11Sushil Lakhani
CIT Vs. R.D. Aggarwal & Co. (56 ITR 20) & Circular 23 and 786 lay down certain tests.
Business in India Vs. Business with India
Difference between a BC and a PE• BC is wider in scope than PE.
Section 9(1)(i) – Business Connection – Judicial Interpretations
SECTION 9(1)(i)--BUSINESS CONNECTION
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 12Sushil Lakhani
Source of Income outside India• “Source” – meaning of (91 ITD 133(Del); 85 ITD 478(Del))• Whether “Export” – a source outside India ??(262 ITR 513(Mad))
“Service utilised” is where the income accrues (250 ITR 164(AP))
Query?• Fees to Investment Advisor of non- resident FII--both are outside :
- No presence of adviser in India (250 ITR 194(AAR); 271 ITR 1 (AAR); 272
ITR 416 (AAR))- Presence of adviser in India – Service PE clause
Payment of commission to foreign agents (Circular 23 of 1969; 125
ITR 525(SC); contrary - 278 ITR 97(AAR))
SECTION 9(1)(i)--BUSINESS CONNECTION - Issues
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 13Sushil Lakhani
Payments for supply and installation of equipment• Payment of design and drawings alongwith equipment (259 ITR 248)(Del)-
Mitsui);• Payment for installation and supervision of machinery supplied—not
taxable --as part of supply(262 ITR 110(AP)-Sundwiger) ;Contrary Decisions:• Proportionate amount relating to provision of certain subsidiary services in
course of supply taxable as PE existed.– Protocol of India – Japan Treaty (271 ITR 193)(AAR)-IHH)
• Where consideration for supply and installation separately stated (279 ITR 165)(AAR)-Rotem)
• Finalisation and signing of deal by country manager in India amounts to PE (268 ITR 156)(AAR)-Sutron)
SECTION 9(1)(i)--BUSINESS CONNECTION - Issues
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 14Sushil Lakhani
ROYALTIESRoyalty and FTS deemed to accrue or arise in India if payable by:
GovernmentGovernment
ResidentResident
Non-residentNon-resident
In all cases, except where payable for any right, property etc. or services utilized for the purpose of / in business or profession carried on by such person outside India, or for the purposes of making or earning any income from any source outside India
In all cases without exception
Only in cases where it is payable for any right, property etc. or services utilized for the purpose of a business or profession carried on by such person in India, or for the purposes of making or earning any income from any source in India
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 15Sushil Lakhani
For Agreements on or after 1 April 2003 • No PE in India
Section 115A of the Act
- Taxed on gross basis
- Lower rate for Central Government approved Agreements or those
relating to matter included in Industrial Policy
20% for agreements entered before 1 June 2005
10% for agreements entered on or after 1 June 2005
- Provisions earlier applicable only to foreign companies extended to all
non-resident entities w.e.f. AY 2004-05
ROYALTIES
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 16Sushil Lakhani
For Agreements on or after 1 April 2003 • PE in India and Royalty / FTS effectively connected with
such PESection 44DA of the Act w.e.f. AY 2004-05
- Taxed on net basis at the rate applicable to Non Residents
- Amounts paid to Head Office / Other Offices not deductible (except
reimbursement of actual expenses)
• PE as defined in Section 92F(iiia) of the Act – fixed place
PE
ROYALTIES
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 17Sushil Lakhani
Difference in definition of Royalty under Act and Treaties
ACT TREATY(UN Model)
• Consideration for transfer Consideration for use or of “all” of any rights right to use
• “Cinematographic films” “Cinematographic specifically excluded films” included
• Services in relation to Services in relation totransfer of any rights transfer if incidental willcovered get covered here else not
• Use of equipment in No Such exclusion. Use of connection with exploration all sorts of equipment of mineral Oil excluded covered.
ROYALTIES
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 18Sushil Lakhani
Payment for Software
Off- the -shelf Software ; (94 ITD 91 (Bang.-Samsung));
( TCS-SC-271 ITR 401)
Customised Software; ( 88 ITD 134(Mum)—ISBC)
Software along with Hardware (82 TTJ 163-Bang-Lucent)
ROYALTIES
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 19Sushil Lakhani
Payment for following whether “Royalty” ?• Consideration for design and drawings (Indian Hotels
(Unreported)
• Payment for “Know how” and “Information”
• Payment for access to info base-not royalty (94 ITD 9 (Bang)-
Wipro)
• Payment for the use of satellite (78 TTJ 498 (Del)-Asiasat)
ROYALTIES
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 20Sushil Lakhani
Analysis of some treaties signed by India
Excludes Ships and Aircrafts • UK USA
Exclude ICS equipment from ambit of Royalties• Belgium / France / Greece / Israel / Netherlands / Sweden
Excludes payment for use of Aircraft• Ireland Includes proceeds from outright sale of copyrights etc. that are
contingent on its use by purchaser
• USA
ROYALTIES
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 21Sushil Lakhani
Fees For Technical Services (FTS)
FTS receipt taxable in India regardless of situs and
mode of services – other than FTS utilised in a
business or source outside India. Consideration (includes lump sum consideration) for
rendering any:• Managerial, technical or consultancy services
Thrust is on ‘Services’ Technical Services vs Technology driven services
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 22Sushil Lakhani
Excludes:
• Construction,
• Assembly,
• Mining,
• Any like project,
• Income chargeable as salaries,
Fees For Technical Services (FTS)
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 23Sushil Lakhani
SOME ISSUES IN FTS
Connectivity payments –standard facilities (80 TTJ 191 (Bang)-
Wipro)
Payment for use of telephone, electricity etc i.e. standardised
products is not FTS (251 ITR 53)(Mad)-Skycell
Payment for repairs
• Hardware (273 ITR 437)(AAR)-Airport Authority-Not FIS
• Software – Clause 12 (4) (a) of India USA Treaty – Ancillary and
subsidiary to royalty (273 ITR 437)(AAR)-Airport Authority
• Specialised repairs –FTS (79 TTJ 268) (Del)-Sahara
• General repairs-Not FTS (91 ITD 133)(Del)-Lufthansa
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 24Sushil Lakhani
Absence of specific Article on FTS
• Bangladesh, Brazil, Greece, Indonesia, Libya, Mauritius,
Nepal, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Syria, Thailand, UAE, UAR
Concurrent Coverage under Independent Personal Services
(IPS)
• Japan, New Zealand
Fees For Technical Services (FTS)
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 25Sushil Lakhani
Fees for Included Services (FIS) – “Make Available”
Deals with Technical Services - but coverage is very
narrow.
Services under FIS should be technical (Mckinsey (99 TTJ
857)); and
Services should satisfy further conditions as per the MOU
of India –US Treaty
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 26Sushil Lakhani
Fees for Included Services (FIS) – “Make Available” (Cont…) Associated with Service PE
The words “make available” held to have the same meaning as in India-USA Treaty even in absence of the MOU (Raymonds Ltd. (80 TTJ 120))
Caution! These treaties also have “Service PE” clause.
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 27Sushil Lakhani
Case Laws• Advisory service –not FIS (80 TTJ 806) (Cal)-Raymonds
• Preparation of project report-FIS?? (85 TTJ 794)(Del)-Sinar Mas
• Payment for strategic consultancy services-Not FIS (99 TTJ 857)(Mum) Mckinsey
• Payment for testing charges-FIS (278 ITR 233)(AAR); (278 ITR 97)(AAR)
Analysis of few Treaties signed by India (FIS)• Directly - Australia, Canada, Cyprus, Malta, Portugal, Finland,
Singapore, USA, UK
• Due to MFN Clause - Belgium, France, Israel, Kazakhstan, Spain, Sweden—(Service PE missing)
Fees for Included Services (FIS) – “Make Available” (Cont…)
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 28Sushil Lakhani
Reimbursement of expenses
Reimbursement of incidental expenses in addition to payments of Fees for
Technical Services (FTS) / Royalty
Reimbursement of cost of services of a third party engaged by the non-resident.
(278 ITR 97)(AAR) -Wallace
Reimbursement of allocated cost (i.e. costs- sharing arrangements) (268 ITR 1)
(AAR)-Danfoss
Payments for services rendered at cost. (273 ITR 67)(AAR)-Timkin
Reimbursement of living allowance, etc of a person deputed to India by the non-
resident. (274 ITR 261)(Del)
Direct payments by the non-resident of expenses and salaries of foreign
technicians. (233 ITR 751)(All)
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 29Sushil Lakhani
Reimbursement of expenses (Cont…)
GREY AREAS
Reimbursement of expenses incurred by group company outside India on behalf of
Indian company
• If the services are taxable in India and
• If the services are not taxable in India
Reimbursement of pre joint venture expenses like incorporation, registration fees
etc. incurred by a foreign joint venture partner.
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 30Sushil Lakhani
Analysis of some treaties signed by India:• “interest on deferred payment sales” included in the
definition – Indonesia, Philippines• Penalty charges for later payment excluded – Singapore,
Indonesia
Payment of usance interest is not a part of purchase price (261 ITR 113) (Guj)
INTEREST AND SHIPPING INCOME
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 31Sushil Lakhani
Payments for Shipping:• Freight
• Payment to Shipping Agent (Circuar 742)
• Bare Boat lease (113 ITR 307)(SC)
• Wet Lease – is same as bare boat lease – sec 44B does not apply (4
SOT 18)
Analysis of Treaties signed by India• Profits taxable only in residence country – USA, Singapore
• Profits taxable where effective management is situated –
• Profits taxable in India for specified no of years – Netherland, Japan
• Profits taxable in Indian but at concessional rates -
INTEREST AND SHIPPING INCOME
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 32Sushil Lakhani
Cross Border Payments – Credit of Taxes
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 33Sushil Lakhani
EXEMPTION METHOD Full Exemption Exemption with progression – taken into account for rate
purposesCREDIT METHOD Full credit – No restriction Ordinary credit – restricted to the extent of tax payable –
qua “Income” Underlying tax credit – except Mauritius & Singapore
Treaty only one way in Indian Treaties Tax sparing
Sparing w.r.f. certain income Sparing w.r.f. tax payable (e.g. Mauritius)
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 34Sushil Lakhani
Directly Via Mauritius
UK Parent / Home Company
Income (Grossed up)
Tax @ 30%
Underlying Tax Credit (633)
1,633
(490)
Income (Grossed up)
Tax @ 30%
Underlying Tax Credit
1,633
(490)
1,143
490
1,143
245
1,633 1,388
Offshore Intermediary Company
Income (Grossed up)
Tax @ 15%
Underlying Tax Credit (633)
Withholding Tax
1,633
(245)
1,388
245
1,633
NIL
1,633
Indian Host Company
Tax @ 30%
DDT @ 12.5%
Withholding Tax
1,633
(490)
1,143
(143)
1,000
NIL
1,000
Tax @ 30%
DDT @ 12.5%
Withholding Tax
1,633
(490)
1,143
(143)
1,000
NIL
1,000
Underlying Tax Credit
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 35Sushil Lakhani
General Principles Whenever exemption method is followed – the
expenses are also not deductible. Grossing up of Underlying Tax & Dividend
Distribution Tax. No Grossing up of Tax Sparing as no tax has
been paid.
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 36Sushil Lakhani
Case Study (a)
Facts:“X” (Parent Company in India)
“Z” (100% Subsidiary in Mauritius)
“A” (50% Subsidiary in BVI)
Case Studies for Group Discussion:
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 37Sushil Lakhani
“Mauritius tax payable” shall be deemed to include any amount which would have been payable as Mauritius tax for any year but for an exemption or reduction of tax granted for that year or any part thereof under:
(i) section 33, 34, 34A and 34B of the Mauritius Income – tax Act, 1974 (41 of 1974)
(ii) any other provision which may be subsequently be made granting
an exemption or reduction of tax which the competent authorities of the contracting states agree to be for the purposes of economic development.
Case Study (a) Contd.(i) What is the “Mauritius Tax payable” ??
As per (Article 23(3) of the India - Mauritius Treaty)
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 38Sushil Lakhani
(ii) Will ‘X’ be entitled to a foreign tax credit in India for the taxes payable (before Tax Sparing) in Mauritius ??
Article 23(3)(i) of India Mauritius Treaty – Section 33, 34, 34A and 34B of the Mauritius Income Tax Act, 1974 have been deleted – Article 2(2) has ambulatory approach – Similar taxes which are imposed after the date of conventions are also covered.
Therefore ‘X’ Should be entitled to credit of taxes payable in Mauritius though the taxes are not paid because of Tax Sparing Clause in Article 23(3).
Case Study (a) Contd.
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 39Sushil Lakhani
(iii)Whether change in the character of income makes a difference for credit??
The Residence State is obliged to give credit / exempt on income so long as the source state has taxed that item “in accordance with provision of the convention.”
(Para 32 of OECD Commentary on
Article 23)
Case Study (a) Contd.
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 40Sushil Lakhani
Case Study (b)
Whether Exchange Rate fluctuation should be considered for giving credit ??Rate of exchange for conversion into rupees of income expressed in foreign currency. (Rule 115 of the Income Tax Rules 1962)
Telegraphic Transfer buying Rate of such currency as on the specified date. (31 ITR 538 (Ch. D))
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 41Sushil Lakhani
Case Study (c)Whether foreign tax credit can be denied on the ground that the taxes are not paid by the foreign deductor to the Govt. of foreign country ??
No ?? (104 ITR 233(Guj))
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 42Sushil Lakhani
Case studies on withholding of taxes
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 43Sushil Lakhani
1. Whether PH can claim refund or US Co will have to claim refund?
• Circular 790 dated 20.04.2000• Whether the two instances in the Circular are only
illustrative?• 83 TTJ 458 (mum)(TELCO) – if assessee was not liable
to deduct tax it can claim refund if TDS certificate not issued
2. Will the answer be different if the TDS certificate is issued?• Yes. Not entitled to claim refund (82 TTJ 325(Del))
3. If the tax was borne by PH, whether that would make a difference?
• No if certificate has been issued??
Case Study 1:
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 44Sushil Lakhani
4 What is the obligation of PH for issue of TDS Certificate.• Certificate has to be issued within 30 days of credit of
deduction of tax (Rule 31)
5 Whether excess deduction u/s 195 in one quarter can be adjusted against short deduction u/s 195 in next quarter?• Yes• Quarterly return to be filed in Form 27
6 Whether excess deduction u/s 195 can be adjusted against payment of TDS u/s 194A to 194D?• Yes• No restrictions under the Act
Case Study 1: (Cont…)
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 45Sushil Lakhani
1. Whether payments for business information will amount to FTS in India and hence liability to TDS?• Non Technical Services – not FIS (99 TTJ 857-Mckinsey)
2. Whether application u/s. 195(2) mandatory?• No• Payer should apply only when he is unable to determine
the sum chargeable to tax
Case Study 2:
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 46Sushil Lakhani
3 Whether the AO was justified in disallowing the payments u/s. 40(a)(i)?• Yes?, if he is of the view that TDS was deductible (Sol
Pharma (83 ITD 72 (Hyd))• Appeal can be filed against such an addition
- Fact that in the assessment of Exotic USA the income was not taxable can of help in getting a favourable order but that by itself not enough.
Case Study 2:
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 47Sushil Lakhani
1 Whether payment by a non resident to another non resident in respect of shares in Indian company is chargeable to TDS?
• Yes; Difficult for the Department to enforce .
2 If Yes, Whether Canada Ltd. should consider the details of different shareholders before deducting tax?
• Yes• Indexation not available (Section 48)
3 What is the rate of tax applicable to :• Resident Shareholders – No TDS • Ismail (UAE) – (Green Emirates Vs.Meman) Not deductible- As per India UAE Treaty gains taxable only in
UAE, hence not deductible.
Case Study 3:
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 48Sushil Lakhani
• Charlie (Mauritius) – Not deductible. As per India Mauritius Treaty gains taxable only in Mauritius, hence not deductible.
• Dinanath (NRI)• Section 115E
•TDS on LTCG – 10%•TDS on STCG – 10%
• Other non-residents (Assumed to be resident of USA)- TDS on LTCG – 10%- TDS on STCG – 10 %
• Sub account of foreign FII• No TDS – Sec 196D (2)
Case Study 3: (Cont…)
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 49Sushil Lakhani
Case Study 4:
1. Whether tax is deductible on payment for purchase of software?• No --as purchase of software not royalty if copyrights not
transferred.2. Assuming payment for purchase of software is royalty,
whether TDS is deductible when:(a) Payment of Rs 5 Cr is made to Software Ltd – Yes(b)Payment of Rs. 5 Cr is made to Singapore Ltd –Yes?(c) Payment of Rs. 5 Cr is made by Singapore Ltd to
Software Ltd – Yes??• Sec 9(1)(vi)(c) – “a person who is a non resident …for the
purpose of business or profession carried on by such person in India”
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 50Sushil Lakhani
Case Study 5:
Project of ‘A’ Ltd.
‘A’ Ltd. ‘B’ Ltd. - HR Agency
‘C’ Inc. – Wholly owned subsidiary
Contract to supply Personnels
Appointment of qualified persons
In India
Outside India
Con
trac
t to
ap
poi
nt
per
son
s at
Pro
ject
Cos
t of
per
son
s +
10
% o
f fe
es
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 51Sushil Lakhani
Case Study 5:
1 Is TDS u/s 195 deductible on payments made by B
Ltd. to C Inc in respect of Cost of the person
employed and 10% fees? • TDS deductible on both cost of the person and 10% fees
charged
• 278 ITR 97 (AAR)-Wallace and Timkin( 273 ITR 67
AAR)
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 52Sushil Lakhani
1 What will be the tax to be deducted at source for
payment of “Professional Fees” paid to Individual?• Covered under S 9(1)(vii)
• Treaty--Specific Provision (IPS) overrides general
provision (FIS)
• Covered under IPS of India- USA Treaty
- Fixed base or
- 60 days in the source state
• If does not fit in “Professional Services” of IPS Article –
Article 5 (PE) applies.
• No TDS
Case Study 6:
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 53Sushil Lakhani
Whether payment for roaming charges is “royalty”? –
No Service (E-Commerce report of OECD) vs use of
equipment
Technical Services vs Technology driven services
(Wipro (80 TTJ 191 Bang); Skycell (251 ITR 53 Mad))
Case Study 7:
IFA-RRC - April, 2006
Cross Border Payments Withholding Tax Issues- Cross Border Issues 54Sushil Lakhani