Post on 18-Dec-2015
CLEAN FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSED PROJECTS
DFW Clean School Bus WorkshopSeptember 13, 2006
Tamara HollowellTransportation Planner
Transportation Department
CLEAN FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSED PROJECTSOverview
Approximately $4.2 Million CMAQ Available69% East31% West
Submittals ReceivedNCTCOG Received 38 SubmittalsOver $21 Million Total Requested Funding About 650 Vehicles Requested
Timeline for Adoption of Staff Recommended ProjectsAugust – STTC Information ItemSeptember – Public MeetingsSeptember – RTC Information ItemSeptember – STTC Action ItemOctober – RTC Action ItemNovember 1 – Notice to Proceed Granted to Awarded Projects
2
Eligible Entities that Submitted ProposalsCLEAN FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSED PROJECTS
City of Allen City of ArlingtonCity of BenbrookCity of Carrollton
Collin County
City of Cedar HillCity of Cockrell HillCity of CoppellCity of Dallas* Dallas Area Rapid Transit
Dallas CountyDallas County Schools Dallas/Fort Worth
International Airport**
City of Denton Denton CountyDenton County Transit
Authority
City of Duncanville
Duncanville ISD
Ennis ISD City of Euless City of Farmers BranchTown of Flower MoundCity of Fort WorthFort Worth Transportation
Authority City of Frisco
City of Garland
City of GodleyCity of Haltom City
City of Highland VillageCity of Hudson Oaks City of Hurst
City of Irving
Kaufman Area Rural
TransportationKaufman ISD
City of Lake DallasLake Worth ISD
City of LancasterCity of Lewisville
City of MansfieldMansfield ISD
City of Mesquite
Mesquite ISD
City of Midlothian
Millsap ISD City of North Richland HillsNorth Texas Transportation
Authority City of PlanoCity of Richardson City of Richland Hills Rockwall ISD
City of Rowlett
Tarrant County City of Weatherford
City of WataugaCity of Wylie
*City of Dallas submitted two separate projects**Four projects submitted by fleets sponsored by DFW Airport 3
CLEAN FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSED PROJECTSEligibility Screen ProcessDRAFT
All Projects YES
NO
Eligible for TERP
ISI Sweeping
NOx Emission Reductions
55 points Max - HD 70 points Max - LD
YES
NO
Completion Date by
End of May 200910 points Max – HD20 points Max - LD
YESCost-Effectiveness
60 points Max - HD35 points Max - LD
YES
NO
Projects will be evaluated
based on ranges to determine
project score
Has Entity Adopted Policy
NOFAIL
Are Technologies EPA/CARB Verified?
NO
YES
FAIL FAIL
YES
FAIL
NOFAIL
Eligible RefuelingStation*
FAIL
NO
YES
*Alternative Fuel Vehicle projects must have an alternative fuel refueling station. If gasoline or diesel project, the project received a “Yes” because those are readily available. 4
CLEAN FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSED PROJECTSHeavy-Duty Evaluation MethodologyDRAFT
5
CLEAN FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSED PROJECTSLight-Duty Evaluation MethodologyDRAFT
Evaluation Methodology for Clean Fleet Vehicle Call for ProjectsLight-Duty
Has Entity Adopted Policy
Are Technologies EPA/CARB
VerifiedDoes Project Achieve
NOx ReductionsCost-Effectiveness
= or <$500,000Completion Date
by June 2009
Eligible Refueling
Station1Pass Eligibility
ScreenYes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 "Yes" = Pass
No No No No No NoLess than 6 "Yes" = Fail
Evaluation of Eligible Projects - 150 points maximum
Replacing Current Vehicles (5)
NOx Reduced (lbs/day) (70) Cost - Effectiveness (35)
Completion Date2
(20)
Strategic
Project3 (10)
Traditional Energy
Reduction4 (10)Replacing or
repowering current fleet vehicles = 5 >0.20 = 70 $1 - $50,000 = 35
By End of May 2007 = 20
New 5-County Nonattainment
region entity = 10
Dedicated Alternative Fuel =
10Purchasing new
vehicle or retrofitting vehicle = 0 0.09 - 0.19 = 60 $50,001 - $100,000 = 30
By End of May 2008 = 10 None = 0 Hybrid = 5
0.07 - 0.089 = 50 $100,001 - $200,000 = 25By End May 2009
= 6 None = 0
0.05 - 0.069 = 40 $200,001 - $300,000 = 20June 1, 2009 or
After = 00.03 - 0.049 = 30 $300,001 - $400,000 = 150.01 - 0.029 = 20 $400,001 - $500,000 = 100.001 - 0.009 = 10 >$500,001 = 0
<0.001 = 0
2The date the vehicle is planned to be operational in the fleet.
4Traditional Energy Reduction - Does the project contribute to reducing dependence on traditional fuel sources.
3Strategic Project is defined as those entities that have never before been eligible for a Clean Vehicle Call for Projects because they are located in the additional 5-county nonattainment area or the entity was not formed until after 2001.
1Alternative Fuel Vehicle Projects must have an alternative fuel refueling station. If gasoline or diesel project, received a "Yes" because those are readily available.
Eligibility Screen
Score Ranges
6
1. Cost-overruns will not be considered for this Call for Projects. Funding amount and number of funded vehicles will be capped at original funded project scope unless changes in the project scope and number of vehicles results in equal or greater emission benefits and no additional costs.
2. Over time, if a project scope changes, NCTCOG staff will rescore
projects using the original scoring process and criteria.
3. Staff administration funds will be used to manage or administer selected projects, potentially audit funded projects, revise and rescore changes in project scopes, and administer any remaining funds through minimum required project operation time (i.e. 2014).
4. Recommend approval of staff recommended projects.
5. Approval of the addition of these projects to the Metropolitan and
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (as needed basis).
DRAFT
CLEAN FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSED PROJECTSProposed Policy Recommendations
7
CLEAN FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSED PROJECTSProposed Funding SummaryDRAFT
East West Total
Heavy-Duty $2,114,600 $ 513,800 $2,628,400 (65%)
Light-Duty $ 631,976 $ 754,497 $1,386,473 (35%)
Total $2,746,576 $1,268,297 $4,014,873
8
CLEAN FLEET VEHICLE PROPOSED PROJECTSStaff Contact
Mindy Mize
(817) 608-2346
mmize@nctcog.org
Tamara Hollowell
(817) 608-2395
thollowell@nctcog.org
http://www.nctcog.org/trans/clean/vehicles/fleet/policy/call.asp
9