Post on 31-May-2018
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
1/150
All Sites
2005 2006 2007
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 3,000,611 2,233,706 142,803 6% $2,809,876 $773,045
Electricity consumption 1,334,868 1,109,399 88,732 8% $2,496,138 $767,695Natural Gas consumption 1,447,611 925,046 54,071 6% $313,638 $5,000Other fuel consumption 218,132 199,261 0 $100 $350
Total Water Consumption, m3 6,907,027 5,659,249 243,571 4% $81,310 $48,000Municipal 0 0
Well 0 4,460,746
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 283,673 221,870 13,891 6%
Indirect Emissions 194,285 160,009 11,317 7%Direct NG emisions 72,196 47,256 2,575 5%
Other direct emissions 17,192 14,605 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 5,748,446 4,813,324 144,189 3%
To WWTP 0 0To municipal 0 0
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 35,144 26,988 489 2% $50,000Waste Disposed 21,704 16,427 489Waste Recycled 13,440 10,561 0
Total $2,941,187 $821,045
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
EstimatedEnergy, Water,
GHGs, or WasteReductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
Cost Savings,USD
EstimatedCapital costs,
USD
Seeindividualfactory tabsfor project
descriptions
This coinformaincomprespon
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
2/150
Americas Region EMEAI East Region
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 50,102 6% $680,430 $253,500 41,522 13% $461,349 $0 23,487
Electricity consumption 17,705 4% $422,644 $248,500 19,848 15% $405,497 $0 23,487
Natural Gas consumption 32,397 8% $257,786 $5,000 21,674 14% $55,852 $0 0
Other fuel consumption 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 46,477 12% $61,350 $0 33,310 19% $7,880 $0 133,822
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalent 5,483 6% 2,782 11% 3,336
Indirect Emissions 4,015 6% 1,675 11% 3,336Direct NG emisions 1,468 7% 1,107 14% 0
Other direct emissions 0 0 0
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0% 10,328 13% 128,462
To WWTP
To municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 0 0% $50,000 0 0% 113
Waste Disposed 0 0 113
Waste Recycled 0 0 0
Total $791,779 $253,500 $469,228 $0
EstimatedEnergy,Water,
GHGs, orWaste
Reductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
CostSavings,
USD
EstimatedCapital
costs, USD
EstimatedEnergy,Water,
GHGs, orWaste
Reductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
CostSavings,
USD
EstimatedCapital
costs, USD
EstimatedEnergy,Water,
GHGs, orWaste
Reductions
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
3/150
EMEAI West Region Asia / Pac Region
3% $993,421 $33,000 27,692 8% $673,577 $486,195
8% $993,421 $33,000 27,692 15% $673,577 $486,195
0% $0 $0 0 0% $0 $0
$0 $0 0 $0 $0
3% $0 $0 29,962 7% $10,581 $48,000
6% 2,291 5%
9% 2,291 6%0% 0 0%
0
3% 5,399 2%
1% 376 6%
376
0
$993,421 $33,000 $684,158 $534,195
Percentreductionfrom 2007
CostSavings,
USD
EstimatedCapital
costs, USD
EstimatedEnergy,Water,
GHGs, orWaste
Reductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
CostSavings,
USD
EstimatedCapital
costs, USD
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
4/150
Americas Region
2005 2006 2007
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 1,336,492 881,681 50,102 6% $680,430
Electricity consumption 553,973 479,149 17,705 4% $422,644Natural Gas consumption 782,519 402,532 32,397 8% $257,786
Other fuel consumption 0 0 0 $0Total Water Consumption, m3 812,410 385,252 46,477 12% $61,350
Municipal 0 0Well 0 0
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 120,470 88,950 5,483 6%
Indirect Emissions 80,437 68,384 4,015 6%Direct NG emisions 40,033 20,566 1,468 7%
Other direct emissions 0 0 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 387,766 128,408 0 0%
To WWTP 0 0To municipal 0 0
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 16,496 10,920 0 0% $50,000Waste Disposed 9,922 7,087 0Waste Recycled 6,574 3,833 0
Total $791,779
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
Cost Savings,USD
Seeindividualfactory tabsfor projectdescriptions
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
5/150
$253,500$248,500
$5,000$0$0
$253,500
EstimatedCapital costs,
USD
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
6/150
EMEAI EAST Sites
2005 2006 2007
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 321,254 329,715 41,522 13% $462,449
Electricity consumption 134,866 131,103 19,848 15% $406,497Natural Gas consumption 141,493 154,812 21,674 14% $55,852
Other fuel consumption 44,895 43,800 0 $100Total Water Consumption, m3 223,593 177,437 33,310 19% $9,380
Municipal 0 0Well 0 0
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 26,065 26,190 2,782 11%
Indirect Emissions 15,710 15,231 1,675 11%Direct NG emisions 7,227 7,907 1,107 14%
Other direct emissions 3,128 3,052 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 62,227 76,923 10,328 13%
To WWTP 0 0To municipal 0 0
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,467 1,071 0 0%Waste Disposed 945 697 0Waste Recycled 523 374 0
Total $471,828
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
Cost Savings,USD
Seeindividualfactory tabsfor projectdescriptions
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
7/150
$350$0
$0$350$0
$350
EstimatedCapital costs,
USD
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
8/150
Asia/Pac Region
2005 2006 2007
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 403,797 344,110 27,692 8% $673,577
Electricity consumption 239,534 190,726 27,692 15% $673,577Natural Gas consumption 17,902 11,530 0 0% $0
Other fuel consumption 146,361 141,854 0 $0Total Water Consumption, m3 489,676 442,679 29,962 7% $10,581
Municipal 0 0Well 0 0
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 62,828 50,687 2,291 5%
Indirect Emissions 49,692 39,493 2,291 6%Direct NG emisions 914 589 0 0%
Other direct emissions 12,222 10,605 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 277,320 261,600 5,399 2%
To WWTP 0 0To municipal 0 0Total Waste Generated, metric tones 6,706 6,335 376 6%
Waste Disposed 4,011 3,409 376Waste Recycled 2,695 2,926 0
Total $684,158
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
Cost Savings,USD
Seeindividualfactory tabsfor projectdescriptions
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
9/150
$486,195$486,195
$0$0$48,000
$534,195
EstimatedCapital costs,
USD
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
10/150
EMEAI WEST Sites
2005 2006 2007
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 939,068 682,366 23,487 3% $993,421
Electricity consumption 406,495 312,587 23,487 8% $993,421Natural Gas consumption 505,697 356,172 0 0% $0
Other fuel consumption 26,876 13,607 0 $0Total Water Consumption, m3 5,381,348 4,653,881 133,822 3% $0
Municipal 0 0Well 0 4,460,746
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 74,310 56,043 3,336 6%
Indirect Emissions 48,446 36,901 3,336 9%Direct NG emisions 24,022 18,194 0 0%
Other direct emissions 1,842 948 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 5,021,133 4,346,393 128,462 3%
To WWTP 0 0To municipal 0 0Total Waste Generated, metric tones 10,474 8,662 113 1%
Waste Disposed 6,826 5,233 113Waste Recycled 3,648 3,428 0
Total $993,421
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
Cost Savings,USD
Seeindividualfactory tabsfor projectdescriptions
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
11/150
$33,000$33,000
$0$0$0
$33,000
EstimatedCapital costs,
USD
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
12/150
Antipolo City
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 28,562 27,830 8346 30Electricity consumption 22,162 21,011 t otal electrical reduction 8346 40
3941 19
Lighting: install an automatic light flux regulator 18 0
Improve monitoring of chillers efficiency 23 0
551 3
233 1
21 0
89 0
Close cooling tunnels ducts (open on top). 89 0
Increase mainteinance of motors
1141 5
Solar water heating of hot water 1744 8
496 2
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percent reductiofrom 2007
New boiler installation - site reports this asproject for 2008
Install VSD drives for boiler air blower controlled
by flue monitorControl Dissolved Oxygen content in WWTPand close loop blowers
MCC improvement (autamatic stop of motion ifnot required)
Reduction of Air Compressed usage inproduction (empty bags)
Energy monitoring and targeting on steam
consumption install meters for key users
Monitor steam production and efficiency of theboilers
Pre-heat of combustion air through effluent fluegas economizer a)
Pre-heat of make-up water through effluent fluegas economizer b)
Condensate collection completion to 100% (nowis 80%)
Coating pan water after washing: flush through aheat exchanger to pre heat cleaning water itselfor domestic water
Improve efficiency of Boilers through correctpressure dimensioning
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
13/150
Blow down of Boiler to pre-heat make-up water
Natural Gas consumption 0 0Other fuel consumption 6,400 6,819
Total Water Consumption, m3 14,343 17,512
MunicipalWell
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 3,272 3,154 1238 46
Indirect Emissions 2,826 2,679 New boiler installation - as est by site 1238 46Direct NG emisions 0 0
Other direct emissions 446 475Total Effluent Discharged, m3 8,709 7,431
To WWTPTo municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,002 850Waste Disposed 738 592Waste Recycled 264 258
Total cost savings
electricity 7.3 PHP/KWH
1 PHG =$0.025
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
14/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
15/150
$213,370$213,370
$0
$63,870
$28,000
$500
$35,000
$70,000
$16,000
EstimatedCapitalcosts,
USD
Budgetedfor in 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric for thisinitiative welldefined? Yes/No
Does your location have themeans of measuring the
metric? Yes/No
Date Started or EstimetedStaring Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish date
Name of the personresponsible for this
initiative
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
16/150
$213,370 Total Capital
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
17/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
18/150
Major Issues or challengesIs this "on going" or"one time" effort?
Percent completed: NotStarted, 25%, 50%, 75%,
Finished
Overall Status for thiGreen, Yellow,
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
19/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
20/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
21/150
Asquith
2005 2006 2007
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 47159 34,064 2048 6%
Electricity consumption 29,257 22,534 2048
Natural Gas consumption 17,902 11,530Other fuel consumption 0 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 22,814 19,055 1140 6%Municipal 1140
Well
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 7777 5,875 440 7%
Indirect Emissions 6,863 5,286 440
Direct NG emisions 914 589
Other direct emissions 0 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 16,373 11,036
To WWTPTo municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 871 547 41.42 8%Waste Disposed 575 290 41.42
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percent reductionfrom 2007
factory commitment to 5%reduction in energy use.Calc value by factory is2048 GJ
factory commitment to 5%reduction in water use.
Calc value by factory is1140 m3
factory commitment to 5%reduction in emissions.Calc value by factory is440 CO2 equiv.
factory commitment to 5%reduction in waste. Calcvalue by factory is 41.42tonnes
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
22/150
Waste Recycled 296 257
total cost savings
electricity cost 0.1 AUD/KWHwater cost 0.01 AUD/gallon1 AUD = 0.9 USD
factory commitment toincrease recycling by 10%
2007 values for inputs and outputs are based on
Jan- Sept data
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
23/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
24/150
$54,134 0
$51,425
$2,709
$2,709
Cost savings,USD
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
Budgetedfor in 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric for thisinitiative welldefined? Yes/No
Does your location have themeans of measuring the
metric? Yes/No
Date Started or EstimetedStaring Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish date
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
25/150
$56,843 0 Total Capital
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
26/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
27/150
Name of the personresponsible for this
initiative
Is this "on going" or"one time" effort?
Percent completed: NotStarted, 25%, 50%, 75%,
Finished
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
28/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
29/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
30/150
Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this Initiative:Green, Yellow, Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
31/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
32/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
33/150
Baddi
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 49,499 46,553 4652 10% $116,812
Electricity consumption 15,746 15,421 Total Electrical reduction 4652 30% $116,812
171 1% $4,294
342 2% $8,588
427 3% $10,722
72 0% $1,808
179 1% $4,495
VSD in air compressors 628 4% $15,769
Better insulation of all building 424 3% $10,647
Better insulation of curing rooms 21 0% $527
Shading HVAC condensers 215 1% $5,399
53 0% $1,331
1897 12% $47,634
15 0% $377
1 0% $25
Install electronic ballasts on 2x40 W tubes 202 1% $5,072
Complete condensate return - part B 5 0% $126
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
Costsavings,
USD
1. Install overhead water storage tanks toeliminate cotinuous pumping in toilets andcanteen
2. Recycle vacuum pump water back tocooling tower
3. Replace AC plant with high efficiencyunits and close loop control
Rectify distribution lines of Compressed
AirReduce leakages by installing segm.valves and monitoring
Better mainteinance of cooling tunnel 2JOT
Substitute decentralized units with a new
centralized chilled water unitImprove efficiency of water pumpingsystem
Install automatic "too full" control fortreated water tanks
Substitute boiler with smaller moreefficient boiler
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
34/150
Insulate thermically the condensate tank
Solar heating of boiler make-up waterWaste heat recovery from DGs
Waste heat recovery from Incinerator
Solar water heating of process raw water
Natural Gas consumption 0 0Other fuel consumption 33,753 31,132
Total Water Consumption, m3 71,709 52,857 18750 35%Municipal
Well 18750
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 6,488 6,220 123 2%
Indirect Emissions 4,136 4,051 assume 2% reductionDirect NG emisions 0 0
Other direct emissions 2,352 2,169Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0 0
To WWTP
To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 61 186Waste Disposed 61 186Waste Recycled 0 0
total savings $116,812
electricity cost: 3.6 INR/KWH
I INR = 0.025 USD
Eliminate leakages by continuousmonitoring and maint.
Complete condensate return - part A + B(only in $ sav)
1. Install overhead water storage tanks toeliminate continuous pumping in toilets &canteen thereby reducing the flow ofwater waste. 2. Vacuum pump water tobe recycled back to spare cooling tower.
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
35/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
36/150
0
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
Budgeted forin 2008?Yes/No
PAR approved?Yes/No
Is the metric for thisinitiative well defined?Yes/No
Does your location have themeans of measuring the
metric? Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted Staring
Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of the personresponsible for this
initiative
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
37/150
0 total capital
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
38/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
39/150
Major Issues or challengesIs this "on going" or"one time" effort?
Percent completed: NotStarted, 25%, 50%,
75%, Finished
Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green, Yellow,
Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
40/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
41/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
42/150
Bangalore
2005 2006 2007
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 18,167 19,834 1920 10% $66,960
Electricity consumption 7,025 7,166 1920 27% $66,960
Natural Gas consumption 0 0Other fuel consumption 11,142 12,668 .
Total Water Consumption, m3 22,396 20,543Municipal
Well
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 2,622 2,765 471 25%
Indirect Emissions 1,846 1,882 assume 25% reduction 471 25%Direct NG emisions 0 0
Other direct emissions 776 883Total Effluent Discharged, m3 4,616 3,152
To WWTPTo municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 97 70Waste Disposed 15 29Waste Recycled 82 41
total savings $66,960
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
Costsavings,
USD
Installation of Power factorController panel to improvethe existing power factorfrom 0.89 to 0.99. Theproject includes design apower factor controller,manufacture at supplierend and install at our site.
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
43/150
electricity cost: 5 INR/KWH
I INR = 0.025 USD
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
44/150
0
0 total capital
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
Budgeted forin 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved? Yes/No
Is the metric for thisinitiative well defined?Yes/No
Does your location have themeans of measuring the metric?
Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted Staring
Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of theperson responsible
for this initiative
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
45/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
46/150
Is this "on going" or"one time" effort?
Percent completed:Not Started, 25%,
50%, 75%, Finished
Major Issuesor challenges
Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green, Yellow,
Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
47/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
48/150
Biesheim
2005 2006 2007
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 278,703 199,201
Electricity consumption 119,850 92,525Natural Gas consumption 158,385 106,676
Other fuel consumption 468 0Total Water Consumption, m3 5,134,607 4,460,746 133,822 3%
MunicipalWell 4,460,746 133,822
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 11,035 7,692
Indirect Emissions 2,905 2,243Direct NG emisions 8,127 5,449
Other direct emissions 3 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 4,929,222 4,282,056 128,462 3%
To WWTPTo municipal 128,462
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 3,537 4,538 27 1%Waste Disposed 2,640 2,977 27
Waste Recycled 897 1,561total savings 0
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
Cost savings,USD
Factory reports a 3%reduction goal for 2008
water cost isfree
assume 3% reduction inwastewater too
Factory reports 0.9%goal of waste reductionfor 2008
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
49/150
0 total capital
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
Budgeted for in2008? Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric forthis initiativewell defined?Yes/No
Does your locationhave the means of
measuring the metric?Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted Staring
Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of theperson responsible
for this initiative
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
50/150
Major Issues or challengesIs this "on going" or"one time" effort?
Percentcompleted: NotStarted, 25%,
50%, 75%,Finished
Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green,
Yellow, Red
Ch tt
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
51/150
Chattanooga
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 268,493 195,775 36434 19%Electricity consumption 75,549 81,351 total electric reduction 6944 9%
1792 2%
672 1%
4480 6%
Natural Gas consumption 192,944 114,424 Total Gas reduction 29490 26%14557 13%
3586 3%
2769 2%
8578 7%
Other fuel consumption 0 0Total Water Consumption, m3 138,450 113,835
MunicipalWell
Outputs
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 22,049 19,521 2556 13%
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
1. Leakage control for compressedair
2. Upgrade air compressor controlsystem
3. Heat recovery from aircompressors
4. Optimisation of compressed airdistribution system
5. Optimisation of chilled watersystem operation
6. Implement an energymanagement system
1. Install feedwater economiserson steam boilers
2. Control excess air in steamlines by managing oxygen;
3. Insulate steam valves &
fittings4. Inspect and repair steamtraps on a regular basis
5. Implement an energymanagement system
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
52/150
Indirect Emissions 12,137 13,676 1504 11%
Direct NG emisions 9,912 5,845 1052 18%
Other direct emissions 0 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 101,841 59,364
To WWTPTo municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 2,132 2,223Waste Disposed 1,443 369Waste Recycled 689 1,854
total savings
electricity cost: USD/KWHP2E2 study info gas cost =
Facility Area Opportunity GJ Therms kWh
Chattanooga Steam 138,000
Chattanooga Steam 34,000 5,000
Chattanooga Steam 26,250
Chattanooga Steam 81,320
Chattanooga Air 500,000
Chattanooga Air 30,000
Assume equivalent to electricalreduction percent reduction in GHG -11%
Assume equivalent to natural gasreduction percent reduction in GHG -18%
Estimated
Investment
Install feedwatereconomisers onsteam boilers
Control excess airby managingoxygen
Insulate steamvalves & fittings
Inspect andrepair steamtraps on a regularbasisLeakage controlfor compressedair
Upgrade aircompressorcontrol system
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
53/150
Chattanooga Air 2
Chattanooga Air 187,500 2
Chattanooga CWS 1,250,000 5
Chattanooga Man 10
Chattanooga Supply
Heat recoveryfrom aircompressor
Optimisation ofcompressed airdistributionsystem
Optimisation ofchilled watersystem operation
Implement anenergymanagementsystemImprove powerfactor to elimatekVArh penalty
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
54/150
$381,690 $145,000$155,243 $140,000$29,998 $0
$17,000 $30,000
$12,000 $25,000
$11,249 $25,000
$74,995 $50,000
$10,000 $10,000
$226,448 $5,000
$111,780
$27,536$5,000
$21,263$0
$65,869 $0
Cost savings,USD
EstimatedCapital costs,
USD
Budgetedfor in 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric forthis initiative welldefined? Yes/No
Does your locationhave the means of
measuring the metric?Yes/No
Date Started or EstimetedStaring Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish date
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
55/150
$381,690 $145,000 total capital
USD 100,000 ###
USD 15,000 $15,000
USD 11,025 $11,025
USD 35,000 $35,000
USD 28,000 $28,000
USD 17,000 $17,000
Localcurrency
ProjectedSaving (localcurrency)
ProjectedSaving(USD)
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
56/150
USD 12,000 $12,000
USD 10,500 $10,500
USD 70,000 $70,000
USD 100,000 ###
USD 16,800 $16,800
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
57/150
Major Issues or challengesName of theperson
responsible forthis initiative
Is this "on going" or"one time" effort?
Percentcompleted: NotStarted, 25%,
50%, 75%,Finished
Overall Status forthis Initiative: Green,
Yellow, Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
58/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
59/150
Gainesville
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
60/150
Gainesville
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 315,964 358,786 0 0% $61,350
Electricity consumption 162,692 209,198
Natural Gas consumption 153,272 149,588Other fuel consumption 0 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 126,792 144,786 46,477 32% $61,350
something that accidentally got erased 2273 $3,000
Water effluent re-use 37879 $50,000
Written water conervation plan 947 $1,250
Cooling tower replace 1894 $2,500
Dishwater replacement 227 $300
Reuse base pellet cooling H20 1894 $2,500
Install driam washout controls 1136 $1,500
Upgrade washing machine 227 $300
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 33,966 41,250 1031 6%
Indirect Emissions 26,137 33,608 840 3%
Direct NG emisions 7,829 7,642 191 2%
Other direct emissions 0 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 26,285 51,294To WWTP
To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 5,892 6,221
Waste Disposed 3,541 5,068
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
Costsavings,
USD
Enthalpy Control System project for eachMunters unit to provide conditionedprocess air to 6 Driams. This control willprovide 25% fresh make up outside air tothe Munters and 75% re-circulated returnconditioned air. Current system provides100% outside air which needs to beconditioned. Result of the enthalpycontrol is that the chill water load will bereduced by 50 tons refrigeration per
Driam which totals out to 300 tonsreduced chill water load. Thusly, one277 ton Trane Chiller Yard Unit will beidled through out the year.
KWHreductionneed toquantified
Per P2E2 assessment, assume 5% totalE savings split between electricity andnatural gas
Waste Recycled 2,351 1,152
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
61/150
y , ,total savings $122,699
electricity cost: 0.06 USD/KWHwater cost 0.01 USD/gallon
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
62/150
Budgeted forin 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric forthis initiative welldefined? Yes/No
Does your location havethe means of
measuring the metric?Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted Staring
Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish date
Name of the personresponsible for this
initiative
Is this "on going" or"one time" effort?
Percent completedNot Started, 25%,
50%, 75%, Finishe
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
63/150
total Capital
O S f
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
64/150
Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this Initiative:
Green, Yellow,Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
65/150
Guangzhou
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water GHGs or
Percentreduction
Costsavings
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
66/150
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 168,144 111,271 1925 3.0% $46,005
Electricity consumption 98,305 65,225 1925 3.0% $44,046
Natural Gas consumption 0 0Other fuel consumption 69,839 46,046
Total Water Consumption, m3 129,852 115,366 5999 5.2%$1,959
Municipal 5999 5.2% $1,959
Well
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 30,238 20,033
Indirect Emissions 23,346 15,490Direct NG emisions 0 0Other direct emissions 6,892 4,543
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 112,035 103,829 5399 5%To WWTP
To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 2,514 2,282
description Water, GHGs, orWaste Reductions
reductionfrom 2007
savings,USD
1. improve efficiencyon chiller systemcondenser; 2. Coolfresh air munter/chillersysteml. Factoryestimates 2.5% energyreduction
Reuse steamcondensate and installlow flow faucets.Factory estimates5.2% reduction
Based on waterconservation, expect5.2% reduction ineffluent
Waste Disposed 1,035 721Waste Recycled 1,479 1,561
total savings $47 964
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
67/150
total savings $47,964
electricity cost: 0.59 CNY/KWH
1 CNY= 0.139 USDwater cost0.0089 CNY/gallon
EstimatedCapital
Budgetedfor in
PARapproved?
Is the metric for thisinitiative well defined?
Does your locationhave the means of
Date Started orEstimeted Staring
Date Finished orEstimated
Name of theperson responsible
Is this "ongoing" or "one
Percentcompleted: Not
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
68/150
$140,000$140,000
$28,000$28,000
Capitalcosts,USD
for in2008?Yes/No
approved?Yes/No
initiative well defined?Yes/No
have the means ofmeasuring themetric? Yes/No
Estimeted StaringDate
EstimatedFinish date
person responsiblefor this initiative
going or onetime" effort?
completed: NotStarted, 25%,
50%, 75%,Finished
$168 000 total capital
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
69/150
$168,000 total capital
Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green,
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
70/150
,Yellow, Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
71/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
72/150
Nairobi
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Percent re
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 24,793 9,520Electricity consumption 24,793 9,520 Shut offf all non needed equipment to be determined 5% of 200
Isolate compressed air to departments during weekend tbd 5% of 200
tbd 5% of 200
tbd 5% of 200
tbd 5% of 200
Natural Gas consumption 0 0Other fuel consumption 0 0
Re use munters condensate as boiler feed watertbd 2% of 200
tbd 2% of 200
Install exhaust gas economiser to the boiler tbd 2% of 200
2,007 Insulation of all steam and hot water pipes tbd 1% of 200
Total Water Consumption, m3 13,519 40
Municipal Seal all leak points and accurate metering tbd 2% of 200Well
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 1,813 696
Indirect Emissions 1,813 696 Assume reduction by 5% tbd 5% of 200
Direct NG emisions 0 0
Other direct emissions 0 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0
To WWTP tbd 5% of 200
EstimatedEnergy, Water,
GHGs, or WasteReductions
Replace static air losses in the network by repairingleaks
Isolate production areas(air conditioned) fromwarehouse
Introduce Day lighting for warehouse by changing rooftype
Improve oil consumption of main boilers throughefficient burner management
No project conceptualised this year , but intend to keep
NFI
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
W t R d ti
Percentreduction from
2007
Costsavings,
USD
EstimatedCapital
t
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
73/150
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 22,073 17,893 447 5% $5,381 0
Electricity consumption 5,310 4,166 104 3% $2,615
Natural Gas consumption 16,763 13,727 343 3% $2,765
Other fuel consumption 0 0Total Water Consumption, m3 3,957 4,804
MunicipalWell
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 1,709 1,370 34 5%
Indirect Emissions 853 669 17 3%
Direct NG emisions 856 701 18 3%Other direct emissions 0 0
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 2,440 2,340
To WWTPTo municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 271 256
Waste Disposed 58 50Waste Recycled 213 206
total savings $5,381 0
electricity cost: 0.09 USD/KWH
Waste Reductions 2007 USD costs,USD
Per P2E2 assessment,assume 5% total Esavings split betweenelectricity and naturalgas
Per P2E2 assessment,assume 5% total Esavings split betweenelectricity and naturalgas
gas cost 0.85 USD/therm
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
74/150
Budgetedfor in 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric forthis initiative welldefined? Yes/No
Does your location havethe means of
measuring the metric?
Date Started orEstimeted Staring
Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of the personresponsible for this
initiative
Is this "on going" or"one time" effort?
Percent completed:Not Started, 25%,
50% 75% Finished
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
75/150
total capital
Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric?Yes/No
Date date initiative 50%, 75%, Finished
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
76/150
Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this Initiative: Green,
Yellow, Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
77/150
,
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
78/150
Panyu
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
79/150
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 68,341 70,164 3508 5%Electricity consumption 36,324 35,094 3508
Natural Gas consumption 0 0
Other fuel consumption 32,017 35,070Total Water Consumption, m3 181,100 161,135 16114 10%
Municipal
Well
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 10,857 7,808 390 5%
Indirect Emissions 8,627 5,978 390
Direct NG emisions 0 0Other direct emissions 2,230 1,830
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 63,305 53,921To WWTP
To municipal
Site reports 5% energy reduction targetby: 1. Leakage reduction of compressedair; 2.Steam leakage reduction;3.Optimize environmental temp andhumidity in working area; 4.Convertorcontrol in air-compressor; 5.Upgradelights to lower engergy consumptiontype; 6. Air conditioner replacement
Site reports 10% water consumptiondecrease by: 1.Reuse of vacuum pumpwater 150T/Day; 2.Reuse of waste waterfrom purity-water station to water theplant; 3.Install sub-meter for main wateroutlet to measure consumption;
related to energy reduction above,assume same percent reduction inindirect emissions - 5%
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 424 994 50 5%Waste Disposed 165 598 Site reports 5% target in waste reduction 50Waste Recycled 259 396
total savings
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
80/150
electricity cost: 0.7 CNY/KWH
1 CNY= 0.139 USDwater cost 0.01 CNY/gallon
Costsavings,
USD
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
Budgeted forin 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric for thisinitiative welldefined? Yes/No
Does your locationhave the means of
measuring the metric?Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted Staring Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of theperson
responsible forthis initiative
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
81/150
$101,144 $30,000$95,231 $30,000
$5,913 $20,000$20,000
USD Yes/No this initiative
$107,057 $50,000 total capital
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
82/150
Major Issues or challengesIs this "on going"or "one time"
effort?
Percentcompleted: NotStarted, 25%,
50% 75%
Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green, Yellow,
Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
83/150
50%, 75%,Finished
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
84/150
Plymouth
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
85/150
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 180,291 170,233 20,265 12%Electricity consumption 88,186 90,029 Total electrical reduction 20265 23%
Fix Compressed air leaks 81637156
4946
Natural Gas consumption 92,105 80,204Other fuel consumption 0 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 62,876 53,725
MunicipalWell
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 16,214 15,825 2697 17%
Indirect Emissions 11,488 11,728 assume 23% reduction 2697Direct NG emisions 4,726 4,097
Other direct emissions 0 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 18,002 6,176
To WWTPTo municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 2,086 2,402Waste Disposed 1,448 1,830Waste Recycled 638 572
total savings
electricity cost: 0.08 GBP/KWH
1 GBP 1.96 USD
Switch off all nonessential equipment when notneeded and during weekends
Adjust site voltage - turn down tapings on11,000 volt transformer from 432volt 3 phaseto 420v, 3 phase
Costsavings,USD
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
Budgeted forin 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric forthis initiative welldefined? Yes/No
Does your locationhave the means of
measuring the metric?Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted Staring
Date
Date Finishedor EstimatedFinish date
Name of the personresponsible for this
initiative
Is this "ongoing" or "onetime" effort?
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
86/150
0
$886,537
$886,537 0 total capital
Major Issues or challengesPercent completed:Not Started, 25%,
50%, 75%, Finished
Overall Status forthis Initiative: Green,
Yellow, Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
87/150
Poznan
2005 2006 2007
I t
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
Costsavings,
USD
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
88/150
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 376,822 284,117 3222 3% $106,884
Electricity consumption 163,601 114,825 3222 3% $106,884
Natural Gas consumption 213,221 169,292Other fuel consumption 0 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 126,191 101,159Municipal
Well
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 41,296 29,953 639 3%
Indirect Emissions 30,355 21,305 639 3%Direct NG emisions 10,941 8,648
Other direct emissions 0 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 73,909 58,161
To WWTPTo municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 2,263 1,722 86 5%Waste Disposed 522 426 86
Waste Recycled 1,741 1,295
installation of PowerPurge dessicantdehumidification unit
Waste generationreduction by 5% for2008. Process willconsist of a
combination ofemployee training andsupervision,process/equipmentmodification, betterhousekeeping, andincreased wastesegregation.
total savings $106,884
electricity cost: 0.29 PLN/KWH
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
89/150
1 PLN 0.41 USD
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
Budgetedfor in2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric forthis initiative welldefined? Yes/No
Does your location havethe means of
measuring the metric?Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted Staring
Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of theperson responsible
for this initiative
Is this "on going"or "one time"
effort?
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
90/150
$33,000
$33,000
$33,000 total capital
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
91/150
Major Issues or challengesPercent completed: NotStarted, 25%, 50%, 75%,
Finished
Overall Status forthis Initiative:
Green, Yellow, Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
92/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
93/150
Santiaga
2005 2006 2007
Inputs
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
Costsavings,
USD
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
94/150
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 56,733 0
Electricity consumption 14,625 0Natural Gas consumption 41,986 0
Other fuel consumption 122 0Total Water Consumption, m3 7,093 0
MunicipalWell
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 1,798
Indirect Emissions 1,562 0Direct NG emisions 228 0
Other direct emissions 8 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0
To WWTPTo municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,136 0Waste Disposed 878 0Waste Recycled 258 0
total savings 0 0
Budgeted forin 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric forthis initiativewell defined?Yes/No
Does your location havethe means of measuring
the metric? Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted Staring
Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of the personresponsible for this
initiative
Is this "on going"or "one time"
effort?
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
95/150
total capital
Major Issues or challengesPercent completed:Not Started, 25%,
50%, 75%, Finished
Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green, Yellow,
Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
96/150
Shanghai
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description
Inputs
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
Costsavings,
USD
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
97/150
p
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 41,293 55,466 10,594 $148,140Electricity consumption 28,066 29,706 Total electrical reduction 10,594 $148,140
358 $9,739
752 $20,289
Heat recovery from air compressors 2,862 $28,405Use high efficiency blow guns 16 $460
470 $2,001
Reduce steam generation pressure 1,923 $19,072Split driam area into two sections 2,067 $47,209
1,466 $14,202
680 $6,763
Natural Gas consumption 0 0Other fuel consumption 13,227 25,760
Total Water Consumption, m3 74,478 98,972Municipal
Well
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 4,499 8,850
Indirect Emissions 3,578 7,055Direct NG emisions 0 0
1. Install submeters on electricity andsteam pipe
2. Reduce electric consumption fromMontes Chiller operation
3. Reduce steam consumption onjacket water system
4. Check compressed to eliminateleaks
Reduce pressure of compressed air
lines
Minimize starting and stopping ofproduction lines
Install feedwater economizers onsteam boilers
Improve insulation of steam pipes,valves and fittings
Other direct emissions 921 1,795Total Effluent Discharged, m3 67,030 81,872
To WWTPTo municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 599 857W t Di d 403 573
Run WWTP, reduce BODdischarge into environment
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
98/150
Waste Disposed 403 573
Waste Recycled 196 284total savings $148,140
$102 825
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
Budgetedfor in2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric forthis initiativewell defined?Yes/No
Does your location havethe means of measuring
the metric? Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted
Staring Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of the personresponsible for this
initiative
Is this "on going"or "one time"
effort?
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
99/150
$102,825
$102,825
$1,082
$0
$27,052$974
$0
$0$16,231$40,578
$16,908
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
100/150
$102,825 total capital
Major Issues or challengesPercent completed:Not Started, 25%,
50%, 75%, Finished
Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green, Yellow, Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
101/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
102/150
Silao
2005 2006 2007
Inputs$99 948
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
Costsavings,
USD
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
103/150
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 66,104 63,749 4543 7%$99,948
Electricity consumption 33,326 32,552 Total electrical reduction 1979 6% $71,375268 1% $9,666
14 0% $505
62 0% $2,236
1635 5% $58,968
Natural Gas consumption 32,778 31,197 Total gas reduction 2564 8% $28,573
1669 5% $18,599
265 1% $2,953
630 2% $7,021
Other fuel consumption 0 0Total Water Consumption, m3 40,292 44,159
MunicipalWell
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 6,531 6,338 681 11%
Indirect Emissions 4,857 4,744 474 10%
1. Inspect and repaircompressed air leaks
2. Use high efficiency airblow guns
3. Install additionalreceiver tank capacity
4. Implement an energymanagement system
1. Install (feedwater)economizers on steamand hot water boilers
2. Improve insulation inboiler house
3. Install an automaticblowdown system
Assume equivalentreduction in electricalGHG as in comsuption -10%
Direct NG emisions 1,674 1,594 207 13%
Other direct emissions 0 0Total Effluent Discharged, m3 10,407 15,236
To WWTPTo municipal
Assume equivalentreduction in gas GHG asin comsuption - 13%
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
104/150
To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 1,536 912
Waste Disposed 1,099 702Waste Recycled 437 211
total savings $99,9
electricity cost: 1.39 MXN/KWH
1 MXN 0.093 USD
gas cost 12.64 MXN/ThermP2E2 Study info
Facility Area Opportunity GJ Therms kWh
Silao Steam 1669 463,611 MXN
Silao Steam 265 73,611 MXN
Silao Steam 630 175,000 MXN
Silao Air 75,000 MXN
Silao Air 3,900 MXN
Silao Air 18,750 MXN
EstimatedInvestment
Localcurren
Install (feedwater)economizers onsteam and hot waterboilers
Improve insulation inboiler house
Install an automaticblowdown system
Inspect and repaircompressed air leaks
Use high efficiency airblow guns
Install additionalreceiver tank capacity
Silao Man 1863 456,260 100,000Implement an energymanagement system
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
105/150
$9 300
EstimatedCapital
costs, USD
Budgeted forin 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric for thisinitiative well defined?Yes/No
Does your locationhave the means of
measuring the metric?Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted Staring
Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of the personresponsible for this
initiative
Is this "ongoing" or "onetime" effort?
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
106/150
$9,300$9,300
$0
$0
$0
$9,300
$0
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
107/150
$9,300 total capital
155,232 $14,258
24,621 $2,261
58,550 $5,378
86,250 $7,922
4,485 $412
21,563 $1,981
Projected
Saving(localcurrency)
ProjectedSaving(USD)
697,953 $64,108
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
108/150
Major Issues or challengesPercent completed:Not Started, 25%,
50%, 75%, Finished
Overall Statusfor this Initiative:Green, Yellow,
Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
109/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
110/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
111/150
St. Petersburg
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 228,795 249,642 34,950 14% $285,457
El t i it ti 87 302 94 830 13 276 14% $221 725
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
Costsavings,
USD
Sit h t t d j t
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
112/150
Electricity consumption 87,302 94,830 13,276 14% $221,725
Natural Gas consumption 141,493 154,812 21,674 14% $55,852
Other fuel consumption 0 0Total Water Consumption, m3 115,969 103,997 14,560 14% $7,880
Municipal 14,560 14% $7,880
Well
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 15,142 16,509 2311 14%
Indirect Emissions 7,915 8,602 assume 14% 1204
Site has not reported any projectsbut has reported that their goal for2008 is to keep electricityconsumption/MSSU equal to 2007levels. Production FOB for 2008 is14% greater than 2007 so assumeelectricity use will be reduced by14% as well.
Site has not reported any projectsbut has reported that their goal for2008 is to keep gas
consumption/MSSU equal to 2007levels. Production FOB for 2008 is14% greater than 2007 so assumegas use will be reduced by 14% aswell.
Site has not reported any projectsbut has reported that their goal for2008 is to keep waterconsumption/MSSU equal to 2007
levels. Production FOB for 2008 is14% greater than 2007 so assumewater use will be reduced by 14%as well.
Direct NG emisions 7,227 7,907 assume 14% 1107Other direct emissions 0 0
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 57,611 73,771 assume 14% 10328 14%To WWTP
To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 1,295 995
Waste Disposed 854 662Waste Recycled 441 333
total savings $293 336
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
113/150
total savings $293,336
electricity cost: 1.46 RUB/KWH
1 RUB 0.041 USD
gas cost 6.63 RUB/thermwater cost 0.05 RUB/gallon
Per site, projects include:
Other comments:
Use high-efficiency utilities equipment,
Install manufacturing line of the new generation
Continue with various energy saving initiatives (e.g. dry coolers, timers for lighting in office etc).
Keep current positive trend in Energy consumption despite extensive growth of the production volume in 2008 due to 3 rd stage of the Factory Expans
0
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
Budgetedfor in2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric for thisinitiative well defined?Yes/No
Does your locationhave the means of
measuring the metric?Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted
Staring Date
Date Finishedor EstimatedFinish date
Name of the personresponsible for this
initiative
Is this "on going" or"one time" effort?
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
114/150
0 total capital
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
115/150
0 total capital
ion
Major Issues or challengesPercentcompleted: NotStarted, 25%,
50%, 75%,Finished
Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green,
Yellow, Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
116/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
117/150
Taipei
2005 2006 2007
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 50,298 45,315 1271 3% $23,716 0
Electricity consumption 25,420 17,156 1271 7% $23,716
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
Costsavings,
USD
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
Isolation of area to keep
cool air
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
118/150
Natural Gas consumption 0 0Other fuel consumption 24,878 28,159
Total Water Consumption, m3 67,089 30,639 Leakage prevention 6709 22%Municipal
Well
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 6,185 4,967 223 4%
Indirect Emissions 4,452 3,005 223 7%
Direct NG emisions 0 0Other direct emissions 1,733 1,962
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 9,868 3,511To WWTP
To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 1,296 805 285 35%
Waste Disposed 1,095 635 Wrapping materials reus 285 35%Waste Recycled 201 170
total savings $23,716 0
electricity cost: 2.09 TWD/KWH
1TWD 0.0321 USDwater cost ??? Free maybe
related to reducedelectrical consumption,assum 5%
Budgetedfor in 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric forthis initiativewell defined?Yes/No
Does your location have themeans of measuring the
metric? Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted
Staring Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of the personresponsible for this
initiative
Is this "on going"or "one time"
effort?
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
119/150
total capital
Major Issues or challengesPercent completed:Not Started, 25%,
50%, 75%, Finished
Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green, Yellow, Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
120/150
Tarazona
2005 2006 2007
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 46,519 28,815Electricity consumption 20,233 15,208
Natural Gas consumption 0 0Oth f l ti 26 286 13 607
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreduction from
2007
Costsavings,
USD
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
121/150
Other fuel consumption 26,286 13,607Total Water Consumption, m3 50,581 38,251
MunicipalWell
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 3,967 2,573
Indirect Emissions 2,136 1,625Direct NG emisions 0 0
Other direct emissions 1,831 948Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0
To WWTPTo municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,452.01 0Waste Disposed 1,338.01 0Waste Recycled 114 0
total savings 0 0
Budgetedfor in2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric forthis initiative welldefined? Yes/No
Does your locationhave the means of
measuring the metric?Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted Staring
Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of theperson responsible
for this initiative
Is this "on going" or"one time" effort?
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
122/150
total capital
Major Issues or challengesPercent completed:Not Started, 25%,
50%, 75%, Finished
Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green, Yellow,
Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
123/150
Toronto
2005 2006 2007
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 120,142 127,791 1582 1% $35,028
Electricity consumption 78,777 85,128 Total Electrical reduction 1582 2% $35,028
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
Costsavings,
USD
1. Implement an energymanagement system
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
124/150
1201 1% $26,592
3. Install HF ballasts 298 0% $6,598
83 0% $1,838
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
tbd
Natural Gas consumption 41,365 42,663 0%Other fuel consumption 0 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 57,925 49,057Municipal
Well
Outputs
management system
2. Implement compressedair leakage controlprogramme
4. Switch off LEVs duringnon-production times
Turn off lights in officeswhen not in use
Shut down equipmentduring down hours
Shut down chiller duringwinter
Install submeters toidentify high energy useareas and developreduction plans
Optimize capacity of chillerwater
Install auto light switchesand programmablethermostats
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 6,705 7,142 0 0%Indirect Emissions 4,592 4,963 0%
Direct NG emisions 2,113 2,179 0%Other direct emissions 0 0
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 43,480To WWTP
To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 3,109 829
Waste Disposed 1,972 421 Eliminate styrofoam, cansand bottles
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
125/150
Reduce paper to landfill
Waste Recycled 1,137 408
total savings $35,028
electricity cost: 0.08 CAD/KWH
1 CAD 0.992 USD
P2E2 Study info
Facility Area Opportunity GJ Therms kWh
Toronto Man 100,000 CND
and bottles
Eliminate use of plastics insmall ingredient prep
study ways to minimizegum waste to landfill
Study recycling program toid improvementopportunities
Improve segregation ofwastes to optimizerecycling
Investigage recycling ofdust collector powder
EstimatedInvestment
Localcurrency
Implement anenergymanagementsystem
Toronto Air 335,028 -
Toronto Lighting Install HF ballasts 83,080 -
Toronto Process 23,166 -
Implementcompressed airleakage controlprogramme
Switch off LEVsduring non-production times
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
126/150
$99,200
$99,200
$99,200
EstimatedCapital
costs, USD
Budgeted forin 2008?Yes/No
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric for thisinitiative welldefined? Yes/No
Does your locationhave the means of
measuring the metric?Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted
Staring Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of theperson
responsible forthis initiative
Is this "on going"or "one time"
effort?
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
127/150
$0
$0
$0
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
128/150
$99,200 total capital
100,000 $98,789
ProjectedSaving(localcurrency)
ProjectedSaving(USD)
27,081 $26,753
6,715 $6,634
1,873 $1,850
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
129/150
Major Issues or challengesPercent completed: NotStarted, 25%, 50%,
75%, Finished
Overall Status forthis Initiative:
Green, Yellow, Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
130/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
131/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
132/150
Yorkville
2005 2006 2007
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 75,898 117,687 7096 11% $158,383 0
Electricity consumption 46,976 66,754 7096 11% $158,383
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
Estimated Energy,Water, GHGs, or
Waste Reductions
Percentreductionfrom 2007
Costsavings,
USD
EstimatedCapitalcosts,USD
Budgetedfor in 2008?Yes/No
Site reports 2008 project to
replace air compressorwhich will save anestimated 1.98 million kWh
l i 096 GJ f
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
133/150
Natural Gas consumption 28,922 50,933 0%Other fuel consumption 0 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 25,389 28,611Municipal
Well
OutputsGreen House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 9,024 1180 11%
Indirect Emissions 7,547 10,724 1180 11%
Direct NG emisions 1,477 2,605 0%Other direct emissions 0 0
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 540 174To WWTP
To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 577 479
Waste Disposed 268 477Waste Recycled 309 2 $50,000
total savings $208,383 0 total capital
- translates into 7096 GJ ofelectricity saved
Based on electricalsavings, assume 11%reduction in indirectemissions
sell dust collectorreclaimed dusts to PullmanSugar rather than giving itto FWS
revenuegenerated
electricity cost: 0.08 USD/KWH
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
134/150
PARapproved?Yes/No
Is the metric for thisinitiative well defined?Yes/No
Does your locationhave the means of
measuring themetric? Yes/No
Date Started orEstimeted Staring Date
Date Finished orEstimated Finish
date
Name of theperson
responsible forthis initiative
Is this "on going" or "onetime" effort?
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
135/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
136/150
Major Issues or challengesPercent completed:Not Started, 25%,
50%, 75%, Finished
Overall Status for thisInitiative: Green,
Yellow, Red
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
137/150
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
138/150
Chicago
2005 2006 2007
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 385,107
Electricity consumption 100,422Natural Gas consumption 284,685
Other fuel consumption 0Total Water Cons mption m3 212 417
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
139/150
Total Water Consumption, m3 212,417Municipal
Well
Outputs
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 30,674
Indirect Emissions 16,133Direct NG emisions 14,541Other direct emissions 0
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 183,888To WWTP
To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 2,979
Waste Disposed 1,541Waste Recycled 1,438
Percent reduction
factory closure 100100
100
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
EstimatedReduction/savings
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
140/150
100
100100
100
100100
Dreyfus
2005 2006 2007
InputsTotal Energy Consumption, GJ 82,711
Electricity consumption 50,921Natural Gas consumption 31,790
Other fuel consumption 0Total Water Consumption m3 207 188
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
141/150
Total Water Consumption, m3 207,188Municipal
Well
Outputs
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 9,812
Indirect Emissions 8,181Direct NG emisions 1,631Other direct emissions 0
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 18,885To WWTP
To municipalTotal Waste Generated, metric tones 0
Waste Disposed 0Waste Recycled 0
Percent reduction
factory closure 100100
100
2008 P2E2 projectdescription
EstimatedReduction/savings
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
142/150
100
100100
100
00
Cost savings - all values are in USD
Other Totals
AP
Asquith $51,425 $2,709 $54,134Guangzhou $44,046 $1,959 $46,005Panyu $95,231 $5,913 $101,144Philippines $311,019 $311,019Shanghai $148,140 $148,140
Taipei $23,716 $23,716total AP $684,158Baddi $116,812 $116,812Bangalore $66,960 $66,960
Electrical CostSavings
Natural GasSavings
Other EnergySavings
Water costSavings
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
143/150
EMEAI
Biesheim $0Nairobi $4,700 $2,900 $1,500 $4,000 $13,100Poznan $106,884 $106,884Plymouth $886,537 $886,537Tarazona $0St. Petersburg $221,725 $55,852 $7,880 $285,457Santiga
total EMEAI $1,475,749
Americas
Chattanooga $155,243 $226,448 $381,690Gainesville $61,350 $61,350NFI $2,615 $2,765 $5,381Silao $71,375 $28,573 $99,948Toronto $35,028 $35,028Yorkville $158,383 $50,000 $208,383
Total Americas $791,779Grand Total $2,499,838 $316,538 $0 $81,310 $54,000 $2,951,687
2006 Environmental Footprint SummaryAP
Metric Guangzhou Panyu Shanghai Taipei Antipolo City Asquith Summary
MSSU 180,433 45,070 2,605 19,421 35,220 22,423 305,172
98,305 36,324 28,066 25,420 22,162 29,257 239,534
0 0 0 0 0 17,902 17,902
69,839 32,017 13,227 24,878 6,400 0 146,361
Total Energy, GJ 168,144 68,341 41,293 50,298 28,562 47,159 403,797
0.93 1.52 15.85 2.59 0.81 2.10 1.32
23,346 8,627 3,578 4,452 2,826 6,863 49,692
Electricitypurchased, GJ
Natural Gaspurchased, GJ
Other Fuelpurchased, GJ
total Energy
GJ/MSSUIndirect GHGEmissions, metricTonnes CO2 equiv
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
144/150
0 0 0 0 0 914 914
6,892 2,230 921 1,733 446 0 12,222
30,238 10,857 4,499 6,185 3,272 7,777 62,828
0.17 0.24 1.73 0.32 0.09 0.35 0.21
129,852 181,100 74,478 67,089 14,343 22,814 489,676
0.72 4.02 28.59 3.45 0.41 1.02 1.60
112,035 63,305 67,030 9,868 8,709 16,373 277,320
15 37 1 0 6 0 59
66 4 0 5 0 37 112
1,020 128 402 1,095 732 575 3,952
1,413 255 196 196 264 259 2,583
Direct Natural GasGHG emissions,metric tonnes CO2equiv
Direct (other fuel)GHG emissions,
metric tonnes CO2equiv
total GHGEmissions, metrictonnes CO2 equiv.
Total GHGemissions/MSSU
WaterConsumption, m3
Water con-
sumption/MSSUEffluentDischarged, m3
Haz wastedisposed, metrictonnes
Haz wasterecyled, metrictonnes
Non haz wastedisposed, metric
tonnesNon haz wasterecycled, metrictonnes
2006 Environmental Footprint summaryEMEAI
Cafosa St. Petersburg Nairobi Plymouth Tarazona Biesheim Poznan Bangalore Baddi Summary
154,288 15,979 80,931 17,945 128,845 176,894 6,703 30,236 611,821
14,625 87,302 24,793 88,186 20,233 119,850 163,601 7,025 15,746 541,361
41,986 141,493 0 92,105 0 158,385 213,221 0 0 647,190
122 0 0 0 26,286 468 0 11,142 33,753 71,771
56,733 228,795 24,793 180,291 46,519 278,703 376,822 18,167 49,499 1,260,322
#DIV/0! 1.48 1.55 2.23 2.59 2.16 2.13 2.71 1.64 2.06
1,562 7,915 1,813 11,488 2,136 2,905 30,355 1,846 4,136 64,156
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
145/150
228 7,227 0 4,726 0 8,127 10,941 0 0 31,249
8 0 0 0 1,831 3 0 776 2,352 4,970
1,798 15,142 1,813 16,214 3,967 11,035 41,296 2,622 6,488 100,375
#DIV/0! 0.10 0.11 0.20 0.22 0.09 0.23 0.39 0.21 0.16
7,093 115,969 13,519 62,876 50,581 5,134,607 126,191 22,396 71,709 5,604,941
#DIV/0! 0.75 0.85 0.78 2.82 39.85 0.71 3.34 2.37 9.16
0 57,611 0 18,002 0 4,929,222 73,909 4,616 0 5,083,360
0.4 854 0 6 0.01 12 0 0 20 892
0 441 0 2 0 0 18 1 0 462
878 0 15 1,442 1,338 2,628 522 15 41 6,879
258 0 0 636 114 897 1,723 81 0 3,709
2006 Environmental Footprint SummaryAmericas Total
Dreyfus NFI Chicago Toronto Chattanooga Gainesville Yorkville Silao Summary Summary68,556 119,312 68,298 171,684 53,756 23,461 505,067 1,422,060
50,921 5,310 100,422 78,777 75,549 162,692 46,976 33,326 553,973 1,334,868
31,790 16,763 284,685 41,365 192,944 153,272 28,922 32,778 782,519 1,447,611
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 218,132
82,711 22,073 385,107 120,142 268,493 315,964 75,898 66,104 1,336,492 3,000,611
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 5.62 1.01 3.93 1.84 1.41 2.82 2.11
8,181 853 16,133 4,592 12,137 26,137 7,547 4,857 80,437 194,285
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
146/150
1,631 856 14,541 2,113 9,912 7,829 1,477 1,674 40,033 72,196
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,192
9,812 1,709 30,674 6,705 22,049 33,966 9,024 6,531 120,470 283,673
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.45 0.06 0.32 0.20 0.17 0.28 0.20
207,188 3,957 212,417 57,925 138,450 126,792 25,389 40,292 812,410 6,907,027
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 3.10 0.49 2.03 0.74 0.47 1.72 4.86
18,885 2,440 183,888 43,480 101,841 26,285 540 10,407 387,766 5,748,446
0 0 4 22 2 1 1 2 32 983
0 36 8 0.4 1.57 0 0.40 0 46 620
0 58 1,537 1,950 1,441 3,540 267 1,097 9,890 20,721
0 177 1,430 1,137 687 2,351 309 437 6,528 12,820
2007 Environmental Footprint SummaryAP
Metric Guangzhou Panyu Shanghai Taipei Antipolo City Asquith SummaryMSSU 0
65,225 35,094 29,706 17,156 21,011 22,534 190,726
0 0 0 0 0 11,530 11,530
46,046 35,070 25,760 28,159 6,819 0 141,854
Total Energy, GJ 111,271 70,164 55,466 45,315 27,830 34,064 344,110
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
15,490 5,978 7,055 3,005 2,679 5,286 39,493
Electricitypurchased, GJ
Natural Gaspurchased, GJ
Other Fuelpurchased, GJ
total Energy
GJ/MSSUIndirect GHGEmissions, metricTonnes CO2 equiv
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
147/150
0 0 0 0 0 589 589
4,543 1,830 1,795 1,962 475 0 10,605
20,033 7,808 8,850 4,967 3,154 5,875 50,687
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
115,366 161,135 98,972 30,639 17,512 19,055 442,679
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
103,829 53,921 81,872 3,511 7,431 11,036 261,600
19.26 25.00 0.71 0.00 0.24 0.00 45.21
128.00 0.36 0.00 0.22 0.00 25.00 153.58
701.74 573.00 572.08 635.00 592.00 290.00 3,363.82
1,432.58 396.00 284.00 170.00 258.00 232.00 2,772.58
Direct Natural GasGHG emissions,metric tonnes CO2equiv
Direct (other fuel)GHG emissions,metric tonnes CO2equiv
total GHGEmissions, metrictonnes CO2 equiv.
Total GHGemissions/MSSU
WaterConsumption, m3
Water con-
sumption/MSSUEffluentDischarged, m3
Haz wastedisposed, metrictonnes
Haz wasterecyled, metrictonnes
Non haz wastedisposed, metric
tonnesNon haz wasterecycled, metrictonnes
2007 Environmental Footprint summaryEMEAI
Cafosa St. Petersburg Nairobi Plymouth Tarazona Biesheim Poznan Bangalore Baddi Summary0
94,830 9,520 90,029 15,208 92,525 114,825 7,166 15,421 439,524
154,812 0 80,204 0 106,676 169,292 0 0 510,984
13,607 0 0 12,668 31,132 57,407
0 249,642 9,520 170,233 28,815 199,201 284,117 19,834 46,553 1,007,915
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
8,602 696 11,728 1,625 2,243 21,305 1,882 4,051 52,132
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
148/150
7,907 0 4,097 0 5,449 8,648 0 0 26,101
948 883 2,169 4,000
0 16,509 696 15,825 2,573 7,692 29,953 2,765 6,220 82,233
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
103,997 40 53,725 38,251 4,460,746 101,159 20,543 52,857 4,831,318
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
73,771 6,176 4,282,056 58,161 3,152 0 4,423,316
662.00 0.00 6.23 1.77 0.00 0.00 16.58 686.58
333.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.35 0.96 0.00 347.31
0.00 6.24 1,824.00 2,975.00 426.28 29.00 169.65 5,430.17
0.00 0.00 572.00 1,561.00 1,282.00 40.00 0.00 3,455.00
2007 Environmental Footprint SummaryAmericas Total
Dreyfus NFI Chicago Toronto Chattanooga Gainesville Yorkville Silao Summary Summary114,295 198,084 72,524 27,190 412,093 412,093
0 4,166 0 85,128 81,351 209,198 66,754 32,552 479,149 1,109,399
0 13,727 0 42,663 114,424 149,588 50,933 31,197 402,532 925,046
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 199,261
0 17,893 0 127,791 195,775 358,786 117,687 63,749 881,681 2,233,706
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1.12 #DIV/0! 1.81 1.62 2.34 5.42
0 669 0 4,963 13,676 33,608 10,724 4,744 68,384 160,009
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
149/150
0 701 0 2,179 5,845 7,642 2,605 1,594 20,566 47,256
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,605
0 1,370 0 7,142 19,521 41,250 13,329 6,338 88,950 221,870
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.06 #DIV/0! 0.21 0.18 0.23 0.54
0 4,804 0 49,057 113,835 144,786 28,611 44,159 385,252 5,659,249
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.43 #DIV/0! 0.73 0.39 1.62 13.73
0 2,340 0 ? 59,364 51,294 174 15,236 128,408 4,813,324
0.00 0.00 0.00 8.07 1.53 3.25 0.00 2.50 15.35 747.14
0.00 41.00 0.00 0.13 1.04 0.34 1.84 0.00 44.35 545.24
0.00 50.03 0.00 413.00 367.74 5,065.00 477.00 699.00 7,071.77 15,865.76
0.00 165.17 0.00 408.00 1,852.68 1,151.96 0.00 210.70 3,788.51 10,016.09
6% Energy reduction achieved through:
Compressed air management and leak detection programs -fixing leaks, reducing loads on compressors, installing more energy efficient compressors, etc.
ChattanoogaPanyuPlymouth 30% of our factories will implement compressed air management programsShanghaiSilao
TorontoYorkville
Steam Management - insulating valves and fitting, repairing leaks, optimizing boiler efficiencies through replacement or other meansinstalling meters for monitoring, etc.
PhilippinesBaddiCh tt 29% f f i ill i l b il d ffi i
8/14/2019 2008 E footprint accouting 3-14-08 (2)
150/150
Chattanooga 29% of our factories will implement boiler and steam efficiency programsPanyuShanghaiSilao
Water Conservation via boiler condensate re-usePhilippinesBaddiGuangzhou
Water conservation via other meansBaddi - water recycling, toilet volume reduction 30% of our factories will reduce water consumptionBiesheim - method not givenGainesville - effluent reuse, water urinals, cooling water reuse, cooling tower replacementGuangzhou - installation of low flow faucetsPanyu - reuse vacuum pump water, installation of meters, reuse of water for irrigationTaipei - institute a water pipe leakage program
Waste Reduction -Asquith - method not given 25% of our factories will reduce wasteBiesheim - increasing recycling ratesPoznan - process/equipment modification, employee training and awareness, better housekeeping, better waste segregationTaipei - better re-use of wrapping materialsYorkville - reducing rolling compound usage and better segreation of waste materials to facilitate greater recycling