Prosocial Behavior:WHY DO PEOPLE HELP?
•Why do we help?•Is helping "baked" in our genes?•Why do we sometimes run a
great risk to help others?•Is helping only favorable for
the people that we help, or is it also beneficial to ourselves?
Basic Motives Underlying Prosocial Behavior: Why Do People Help?
•Sociobiology: Instinct and Genes.•Social Exchange: The cost of Helping.•Empathy and Altruism: The Pure Motive for Helping.
Why Do Some People Help More Than Others?
PERSONAL DETERMINANTS OF PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR :
•Individual Difference: The Altruistic Personality
•Gender Differences in Prosocial Behavior
•The Effect of Mood on Helping: Feel Good , Do Good
When Will People Help
Situational Determinants of Prososial Behavior:
•Rural Versus UrbanEnvironment
•The Number of Bystanders:The Bystander Effect
•Characteristics of the Victim
Two Fundamental Assumptions
1. Many social behavior have genetic roots, so that people who have certain genes are more likely to perform these behavior.
2. That evolutionary pressures have favored some of these social behaviors over others , so that they are fixed part of our genetic heritage.
Notion of Kin Selection:
The idea that behaviors that help a genetic relative are favored by natural
selection
Norm of Reciprocity :
The assumption that others will treat us the way we treat them
(e.g. if we help someone, he / she will help in return)
back
The theory that social relationships are best understood by people’s desire to maximize their benefits and minimize
their cost
Rewarding in three Ways:
1.Concept of reciprocity2.Relieves the personal distress of
bystander3.To obtain recognition and positive
feedback at low costback
Empathy
The ability to put oneself in the shoes of another person – to experience events
and emotion the way that person experiences them.
Empathy – Altruism Hypothesis
The theory holding that when we feel empathy for a person, we will attempt to
help him or her, regardless of what we have to gain
• Altruistic is sometimes motivated by self – interest• Self rewards should come into play
only when people do not feel much empathy•Motivated by egoistic desire to relive
their sadness, not by a completely altruistic concern.
DO FEEL EMPHATY FOR THIS PERSON?
NOYOU WILL HELP ONLY IF IT IS YOUR
SELF-INTEREST (REWARD OUTWEIGHT COST)
YESYOU WILL HELP REGARDLESS
OF WETHER IT IS IN YOUR SELF-INTEREST TO DO SO
OBSERVE SOMEONE IN NEED OF HELP
Three Basic Motives Underlying Prosocial Behavior
1.The idea of helping is an instinctive reaction to protect and promote the welfare of those genetically similar and that we have to evolved genetically to follow the norm of reciprocity.
2. the notion that the rewards of helping outweigh the costs, making it in the people ‘s self interest to help (social exchange theory).
3. The concept that under some conditions, powerful feelings of empathy & compassion for the
victim prompt selfless giving (empathy – altruism hypothesis).
back
Believing we are helping someone in order to get a
reward diminishes our view of ourselves as altruistic, selfless
people
Children learn prosocial behavior by imitating others, as in this family, where the children help their parents
carry in the groceries
Altruistic Personality
•Those aspects of a person’s makeup which are said to make him or her likely to help others in wide variety of situation
back
IN WESTERN CULTURE:
MALE SEX ROLE:Chivalrous & Heroic
As A Result:We expect men to help
more in situations that call for brief Chivalrous & Heroic acts
IN WESTERN CULTURE
FEMALE SEX ROLE:Nurturing & Caring(valuing
close, long-term relationship)As a Result:
We expect women to involve in less dangerous but more committed acts. back
The mood the people happen to be in at the time can strongly affect their behavior – in this case, whether or not they will
offer help
Reasons for:“Feel Good, Do Good”
1. Good moods make us look on the bright side of life.
2. “Feel good, Do good” occurs because it is an excellent way of prolonging our good mood.
3. Good moods increases self-attention.
Negative State Relief:“Feel Bad, Do Good”
1. Reducing Guilt Feeling:The idea that good
deeds, cancel bad deeds.2. Relive their Own Sadness &
Distress:Help someone else
with the goal of helping self
3. Repair Moods in Some Other Way:
When we feel blue, we are also likely to help in some totally unrelated way.
Potential Problem of Negative – State Relief:
•It only focuses on the short – term benefits
“I will help only if there are immediate benefits from me”
NEGATIVE – STATE RELIEF HYPOTHESIS:
The idea that people help in order to alleviate their own
sadness and distress.
back
WHO HELPS MORE?:
RURAL AREA:
• People who grow up in small town learn to be more neighborly.
• Neighborliness makes them more trusting and altruistic.
URBAN AREA:
• People who grows in large cities might learn, you can’t trust strangers.
• That it is to mind your own business.
URBAN – OVERLOAD HYPOTHESIS:
The theory that people living in cities are likely to keep to themselves in order to avoid being overloaded by all the stimulations they receive.
back
THE BYSTANDER EFFECT
The finding that the grater the number of bystanders who
witness an emergency, the less likely anyone of them is to
help.
EMERGENCY
NOTICE THE
EVENT
INTERPRET THE EVENT
AS AN EMERGEN
CY
ASSUME RESPONSI
BILITY
KNOW APPROPRIATE FORM
OF ASSISTANCE
IMPLEMENT
DECISION
INTERVENE &
OFFER ASSISTA
NCE
DISTRACTED;
FAILED TO NOTICE
PLURALISTIC
IGNORANCE (interpret
as non emergency)
DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILI
TY (fail to assume personal
responsibility)
LACK OF KNOWLED
GE / COMPETEN
CE
DANGER TO SELF;
EEMBARASMENT; LEGAL
CONCERNS
NO INTERVENTION/
NO HELP GIVEN
PLURALISTIC IGNORANCE
The phenomenon whereby bystanders assume that nothing is wrong in an
emergency, because one else is concerned.
DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILITY
The phenomenon hereby each bystander’s sense of
responsibility to help decreases as the number of witnesses
increases.
back
CHARACTERISTICS OF VICTIM
We are more likely to help to people who are similar to us
than dissimilar
MORE INCLINED TO HELP STRANGERS RATHER THAN FRIENDS
It hurts to see a close friend do better than us in an area of
keen importance to our self – esteem.
WE WOULD LIKE TO THANK:
PROF. GERALDINE SANTOS&
BS Clinical Psychology II-1
FROM GROUP IX:Batara, Rona Lyn
CABUENAS, Ann Margaret B.GARCES, Jericho
GARCIA, Justine MaePAYUMO, Nazarene
Top Related