8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 1/12
REPEAL THE CORE CURRICULUMSTANDARDS FOR OKLAHOMA SUPPORT HB1714
8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 2/12
What are Core Curriculum
Standards or CCS?
National academic standards for English/language arts and math
Adopted by Oklahoma State Board of Education in June of 2010
To be integrated by Oklahoma teachers in their curriculum overthe next 4 years.
The Priority Academic Student Skills, or PASS, fully implemented in Oklahoma in 2003 will become obsolete.
8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 3/12
Misconceptions about CCS
Misconception #1. National standards and tests will make USstudents more competitive with their global counterparts.
While the countries that outperform the US on international
tests have national standards, so do most of those countries that score lower than the US.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/05/Why-National-Standards-Won-t-
Fix-American-Education-Misalignment-of-Power-and-Incentives#_ftnref20
8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 4/12
Misconceptions about CCS
Misconception #2. National standards are necessary so that
parents can understand how their children’s academicachievement compares to that of other students across thecountry.
The meaningful information that parents and other taxpayers
need is already available. If access to the information isinadequate, that does not justify a national standards and testing regime.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/05/Why-National-Standards-Won-t-
Fix-American-Education-Misalignment-of-Power-and-Incentives#_ftnref20
8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 5/12
Misconceptions about CCSMisconception #3. National standards are necessary becausestate standards vary in quality.
Teachers union pressure, pervasive political correctness, and pedagogical and content disputes hamper the quality of statestandards and could equally plague national standards as well.
Centralized standards and testing would eliminate the possibility of competitive pressure for increasing standards of excellence. Isuniformity or excellence more important in the nationalstandards movement?
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/05/Why-National-Standards-Won-t-
Fix-American-Education-Misalignment-of-Power-and-Incentives#_ftnref20
8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 6/12
Yes! They empower the federal government.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/05/Why-National-Standards-Won-t-
Fix-American-Education-Misalignment-of-Power-and-Incentives#_ftnref20
Can national standards andtesting systems make a
considerable difference?
8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 7/12
Will CCS Empower Parents &
Other Taxpayers? No. Centralized standard-setting would force parents and ot hertaxpayers to relinquish one of their most powerful tools forschool improvement: control of the academic content, standards,and testing through their state and local policymakers.
It is unclear that national standards would establish a target of
excellence rather than standardization, a uniform tendency toward mediocrity and information that is more useful to
bureaucrats who distribute funding than it is to parents who areseeking to direct their children’s education.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/05/Why-National-Standards-Won-t-
Fix-American-Education-Misalignment-of-Power-and-Incentives#_ftnref20
8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 8/12
“Federal School Support”
means . . .
Centralized allocation of resources -or- “spread the wealth” goesto school.
The kind of comparable data that a national test would supply
would help to provide equalization of resources among schools.Equal spending has not resulted in raising student achievement.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/05/Why-National-Standards-Won-t-
Fix-American-Education-Misalignment-of-Power-and-Incentives#_ftnref20
8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 9/12
Don’t we need to take
advantage of Federal money? At face value, this appears to be a push for higher standards. In reality, some states have dumbeddown their definition of proficiency on state tests in the interest of receiving federal funds. Federal
funding is an incentive that can trump interest in actual progress on student outcomes. http:// www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/05/Why-National-Standards-Won-t-Fix-American-Education-Misalignment-of-Power-and-Incentives#_ftnref20
No Child Left Behind led to the dumbing down of many state standards and very little improvement
in student outcomes. http://boston.com/community/blogs/rock_the_schoolhouse/2010/11/
Oklahoma should not give up its authority over education in exchange for temporary federal money,especially when we have lost the Race To the Top Grant and will get no Federal money for theadoption of CCS. Implementation of CCS has been estimated in the millions of dollars for somestates. W here will Oklahoma find this funding? http://www.dailynews.com/ipinions/ci_17168645
8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 10/12
How will CCS Affect Teachers?
The national assessments that arise from the CCS will drive what teachers teach on a daily basis. Many schools now tie individualstudent scores directly to teachers’ contracts/pay/rehiring. Tosurvive, teachers will be forced to “teach to the test”.
Why is teaching to the test such a bad idea? Its not, if you preferfor Washington to control what teachers teach and what childrenlearn rather than local officials and parents.
8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 11/12
Can’t we just make our own
changes to the CCS?
Not really. As passed and enrolled, SB2033 stipulates that the
CCS cannot be modified more than 15% of the total curriculum.If the CCS are decided to be not as rigorous as first thought andare modified beyond that 15%, there could be a very real
possibility of our State Department of Education being in
violation of their own school law.
Did you realize that we have yet to see the CCS? How can we besure we wouldn’t want to change more than 15% if we have neverseen the curriculum?
8/7/2019 Why Core Curriculum (National) Standards Are Bad For Oklahoma
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-core-curriculum-national-standards-are-bad-for-oklahoma 12/12
What Can We Do Now?
We need to repeal the CCS before we havespent the money to implement them andbefore it will cost the state to repeal them!
Support HB1714 - Repeal the CoreCurriculum Standards for Oklahoma
Top Related