7/28/2019 What No Genocide? No Crimes Against Humanity?
1/4
What? No Genocide, No Crimes Against Humanity?
By Saneitha Nagani
Now I can understand why the Burmese saying that, "without telling lies, a portery
can neither be smooth nor good" (hmutha mapa linga machaw) is a valid proposition. In my
experiences I have met many Burmese who, despite their claims that they observed the
Buddhist virtues (Sila) of which the five precepts is the minimum and not to tell lies is one of the
precepts, neither have difficulty nor would hesitate in telling lies, sometimes even at point blank
and with bold faces.
Take the speech the Commander-in-Chief General Min Aung Hlaing gave on the recent
Tatmadaw's Day as an example. In commemorating 68th anniversary on the 27 of March as the
Tatmadaw's Day in itself is a lie. It was 'the Resistance Day' when the people from all walks of
life in Burma and not just the soldiers resisted against the Japanese occupation. Not only that he
now acknowledged that Bogyoke Aung San (Daw Suu's father) as the founding father of the
military but he also said that the military has never committed 'war crimes' , 'crimes againsthumanity' or 'genocide'. May be true if our late Bogyoke Aung San were in charge of the military.
Since New Win took over the military it has been used by him as the Godfather of the Mafia
used his 'cosca' or clans in consolidating his power. One should note that those who served with
him under the Fourth Burma Rifles (tatmaha-lei) were the ones most likely to be given 'crucial'
positions in his regime.
In my opinion, instead of Min Aung Hlaing being regarded as the Commander-in-Chief he should
be rather be known as the 'Liar-in-Chief'. In this year's speech, not only that he was giving it in
front of the usual armed forces but also in front of their unexpected but specially invited guest -
Daw Suu. Whether it was intentional or not it was hard to tell but by saying that the Burmese
military has never committed any crimes against humanity or committed genocide he seems to
be telling her that there is no way that the military would admit to its past atrocities against its
own people even if there was to be a 'Truth Commission' set up as in South Africa.
He also said that those who have committed crimes were punished in accordance with the law
and military regulations. This admission in itself is a contradiction to his own assertion that the
military has never committed crimes. If that is the case, then both Hitler and Stalin must be
saints for getting only a few millions of people killed and Raphael Lemkin must have wasted his
life for nothing, trying to get the crime without a name a name now known as 'genocide'. The
military bloodletting began even way before Burma regain her independence. All over Burma, the
Burma Independence Army (BIA) went on a rampage. It was said that the young Burmannationalists had a fervent hate for many other ethnic groups, especially the Indians, whom they
saw as intruders on their sacred soil. Have things changed much? I guess not. He must be quite
young to really know or remember how the Military Intelligence was used by U Ne Win as his
personal hitmen for getting rid of political rivals.
During the so-called Parliamentary democratic government of U Nu people like U Aung Tha (a
Pao Parliamentary in Southern Shan States) and his colleagues were gunned down just outside
7/28/2019 What No Genocide? No Crimes Against Humanity?
2/4
my town, Taunggyi. They were on their way back to Ho Pong. Those soldiers who did the hit
were serving under Major Bo Ni (who later became Chief of National Intelligence Bureau (NIB),
and then Minister for Home Affairs until he was sacked for corruption). They admitted to the
crime but there never was an inquiry set up to investigate nor for any other crimes such as the
disappearance of a Shan Prince from the state of Hsenwi when Ne Win took over power in
1962.There were those who died in custody and those who died a short time after they havebeen released. If the military in Burma was Lady MacBeth in Shakespeares play, like her the
military would not be able to wash away the blood on their hands.
I cannot imagine how uncomfortable Daw Aung San Suu Kyi must felt when she heard those
words. Maybe she felt that it was because of political necessity that she had to sit and put up
with a blatant lie. It was against the grain of her not to say anything about it but one can never tell
how people can change in this dirty business of politics. Niccolo Machiavelli may have been dead
for years but when it comes to politics the advice that he gave in his book 'The Prince' are still
relevant today. For those whose lives and rights have been trampled upon by the military
throughout the years, it must be hard to swallow those words. For example, the parents of the
girl who was shot and during the 1988 uprisings (the girl and those medical students who carried
her were on the cover of Time magazine) were yet to perform the usual religious ritual of offering
'dana' to the monks when someone died are their late daughter's request.
As for Daw Suu, so far she is silent on the whole affair. It does reminded me of a joke my father
told me. Once there was a Burmese fugitive hiding in a Shan village pretending to be a monk.
One day a person who knew him before came for a visit and saw the fugitive pretending to be a
monk. Not wanting the visitor to reveal his secret the bogus monk gave a sermon in which he
said, "bamauk tayar (bamar ta yauk) tei-tei neik (teik teik nei) wa-sei (weisa) me. " Then all the
Shan villagers utter out aloud, "sadu, sadu, sadu." Those in the democratic forces, including the
veteran of in the National League for Democracy (NLD), are like the Shans in the villagecommenting on the event as, "Oh! It's good to see that Daw Suu and the military are working
together." I doubted that was the message the military was sending out, it is rather more about
telling the public who is still in charge and no nonsense about the military committing war
crimes. No crimes have been committed therefore no need for truth commissions.
Maybe Min Aung Hlaing did not have a clue that Burma being a signatory to the 1949 Geneva
Conventions on the laws of war, which are now incorporated into 'The Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court as the elements of crimes', breaches of those laws will have to be
accounted for either in domestic courts or in the international criminal courts. While murder,
extermination, enslavement, forcible transfer of population, imprisonment or other severe
deprivation of physical liberty (their special guest this year herself was the victim who has been
inflicted with this crime for more than a decade until her release in 2010), torture, rape, enforced
disappearances of persons are just a few to mention the crimes against humanity committed by
the Burmese military. The militarys strategy of conducting 'the Four Cuts'( cutting the enemy off
from sources of food, funds, intelligence and recruits) in the ethnic regions are surely in the
purview of war crimes.Attacking civilians, attacking undefended places, treacherously killing or
wounding and so on are also 'war crimes' to put them on top of all other crimes. I hope he has a
7/28/2019 What No Genocide? No Crimes Against Humanity?
3/4
good lawyer to defend himself if he were to face the courts.
Whether events taking place are in accordance with their 'master plan' or not is for us to wait
and see but looking at the situation that Burma is in since the 2010 elections, since the release
of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest, since the U Thein Sein quasi civilian government
took over, since U Thein Sein and Daw Suu met and posed for a photo-shoot with the picture ofher father Bogyoke Aung San as a backdrop and many other changes, looks like their master
plan is working. They broke themselves free of Chinas choking or suffocating embrace. The
United States and President Obamas administration have unclenched their hands and shook
the blood-soaked hands of the Burmas military. Particularly, the military's success in bringing
Daw Ski onto their side must be the jewel in their crown. They can now rest assured that the
things they have set out to achieved in their master plan are almost (I have to emphasised
almost) in the bag. No wonder that the Commander-in-Chief make no qualms about the military
having a continued role in Burmese politics.
For those who believe in the 21st Century as being the Era of Responsibility that war crimes,
crimes against humanity and genocide should not be left unpunished. So far as things arepanning out in Burma those people are sure to be disappointed. To me, it is like the story I that
had as an English text when I was at school. It was a story from Russia called, 'God sees the
truth, but wait.' It was a story about wrongly convicted of a crime he had not committed but when
he was about to die truth was revealed and he died an innocent man. It seems he had a closure
and an peaceful end. I was not though. Where was justice and why did God too long to deliver
justice?
Getting closure one from or another seems to be important to achieve 'social catharis'. South
Africa's 'Truth Commission' must have been a few months or years of public testimony and
revelations which was said to help begin the process of collective healing that psychoanalysisand confession are supposed to provide individuals. If the parents of the girl who was shot and
killed in 1988 and the family of the Shan prince from Hsenwi who disappeared in 1962 were to be
told of the truth, they might have a chance to closure and move on. Revenge is never sweet.
They would have wanted the truth for them to 'face the past and close the door.'
If we were to believe the the science of signs was the science of sequences then the fate of the
military is not good at all. War crimes tribunals or the international criminal court at the Hague or
not its fate, according to the signs, is very bleak. Vultures perching on the Shwedagon pagoda
must be worst than a tiger entering the court of the so-called Golden Coconut king symbolising
the arrival of death itself. Besides a so-called prophecy (tabaung) that reads: 'wa leilone hsone,
pyaung bo-kyone neint-thu myint-bo hpyit-latant nga-kaung hsin-phyu taing-pyi hsu hsei-lunauk-tet hnyin-latant thidingyut yei-tet taing-pyi yet kaung aung nyi-bo lo-latant.'(translated
literally as when the two wa symbols meet change will come the chance for the ones at the
bottom to rise over those at the top when you have five white elephants its time for turmoil in the
country If there are floods in the month of Thadingyut the country will be in chaos through unity
they shall be overcome.) As for the law of Karma, 'killing or maiming the monks and splitting the
order of Sangha' the resultants have to be in this life they will not necessarily be carried over to
7/28/2019 What No Genocide? No Crimes Against Humanity?
4/4
the next life. If I were one of them I would seek redemption now instead of 'defending the
indefensible'. END
Top Related