ARTICLE IN PRESS
0261-2194/$ - se
doi:10.1016/j.cr
�CorrespondE-mail addr
Crop Protection 25 (2006) 487–495
www.elsevier.com/locate/cropro
Weed management in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) cultivated in thefurrow-irrigated raised-bed planting system
Samar Singha, Lav Bhushanb, J.K. Ladhab,�, R.K. Guptaa, A.N. Raob, B. Sivaprasadb
aRice-Wheat Consortium for the Indo-Gangetic Plains, CIMMYT India, CG Block, NASC Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi 110012, IndiabInternational Rice Research Institute (IRRI), IRRI-India Office, 1st Floor, CG Block, National Agriculture Science Center (NASC) Complex,
DPS Marg, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
Received 10 June 2005; accepted 3 August 2005
Abstract
Dry seeding of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in the furrow-irrigated raised-bed planting system (FIRBS) represents a major shift in the
production practices for attaining optimal water productivity in the rice–wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia.
Information on weed management in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS is lacking. Two experiments were conducted for 2 years, with an
objective of identifying appropriate, effective, and economical methods of managing: (1) broadleaf weeds only; and (2) a mixed
population of both grass and broadleaf weeds in dry-seeded rice cultivated in the FIRBS. The major weeds associated with dry-seeded
rice in the FIRBS during both years were Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv., Echinochloa colona (L.) Link, Dactyloctenium aegyptium
(L.) Willd., Leptochloa panicea (Retz.) Ohwl, Caesulia axillaris Roxb., Euphorbia hirta L., Lindernia sp., Commelina benghalensis L.,
Eclipta prostrata (L.) L., Trianthema portulacastrum L., and Portulaca oleracea L. Triclopyr at 500 g a.i. ha�1, bensulfuron at 60 g
a.i. ha–1, ethoxysulfuron at 18 g a.i. ha–1, and 2,4-D (ester) at 500 g a.i. ha–1, all applied at 21 days after seeding (DAS), were equally
effective in realizing higher rice grain yields by controlling broadleaf weeds. Among these, ethoxysulfuron at 18 g a.i. ha–1 was found to be
least expensive but effective for controlling broadleaf weeds. Effective and economical herbicides identified for managing a mixed
population of both grass and broadleaf weeds included fenoxaprop-p-ethyl+ethoxysulfuron at 50+18 g a.i ha–1, applied at 21 DAS, and
pendimethalin followed by (fb) chlorimuron+metsulfuron at 1000 fb 4 g a.i. ha�1 applied at 3 fb 21 DAS.
r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Rice-herbicides; Dry-seeded rice; Furrow-irrigated raised-bed system (FIRBS); Weed control; Costs
1. Introduction
The rice–wheat system, occupying 24 million hectares ofthe productive area in South Asia and China, is importantfor food security (Ladha et al., 2003). In recent years, themajor emphasis in the rice–wheat system has been onalternative resource-conserving technologies (RCTs) forboth rice and wheat to reduce the cost of cultivation andenergy consumption, to sustain productivity, and toincrease the profit margin of farmers. The RCTs underinvestigation are zero tillage, the furrow-irrigated raised-bed planting system (FIRBS), and rotary tillage (Chauhanet al., 2000). Dry seeding with subsequent aerobic soil
e front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
opro.2005.08.004
ing author. Tel.: +9111 25843802; fax: +91 11 25841801.
ess: [email protected] (J.K. Ladha).
conditions on raised beds avoids water required duringland preparation and thus reduces overall water demand(Bouman and Tuong, 2001). Drill dry seeding of rice in theFIRBS is more efficient in irrigation water use thantransplanted rice on puddle soil (Balasubramanian et al.,2003). Borrell et al. (1997) compared flooded rice with ricein the raised-bed system and found that the latter savedwater by 16–43%. The FIRBS saves on fertilizer nitrogen,seed and water and is being promoted in water-scarce areas(Sharma and Singh, 2002; Sharma et al., 2002).Weed infestation continues to be a serious problem in
dry-seeded rice. Aerobic soil conditions and dry-tillagepractices, besides alternate wetting and drying conditions,are conducive for germination and growth of highlycompetitive weeds, which cause grain yield losses of50–91% (Elliot et al., 1984; Fujisaka et al., 1993). Recently,
ARTICLE IN PRESSS. Singh et al. / Crop Protection 25 (2006) 487–495488
Singh et al. (2005) reported good success with dry-seededrice production technology in large-scale farmer participa-tory trials in the Terai of Uttaranchal, India, when thestale-seed bed technique was combined with the applicationof pre-emergence herbicide, pendimethalin within 2 daysafter seeding (DAS). Thus, timely weed control is crucial toincreasing rice productivity. Herbicides are considered tobe an alternative/supplement to hand weeding. Thedevelopment of new, improved herbicides for dry-seededrice is also needed (Gupta et al., 2003). Several pre-emergence herbicides including butachlor, thiobencarb,pendimethalin, oxadiazon, oxyfluorfen, and nitrofen aloneor supplemented with hand weeding, have been reportedto provide a fair degree of weed control (Estorninosand Moody, 1988; Castin and Moody, 1985; Janiya andMoody, 1988; Moorthy and Manna, 1993; Pellerin andWebster, 2004). But, some difficulties are associated withpre-emergence herbicides, such as their limited applicationduration (0–5 DAS) and requirement of adequate soilmoisture at the time of their application. In such situations,post-emergence herbicides are superior. Hence, it isnecessary to evaluate different pre- and post-emergenceherbicides that are formulated from time to time to providewider options to farmers for weed control in rice.
The FIRBS represents a major shift in productionpractices in the rice–wheat system. Weed control in rice isone area that still needs attention for effectively usingRCTs (Malik et al., 2003). To successfully grow rice onraised beds in northern Australia, Borrell et al. (1997) andSingh et al. (2005) concluded that additional herbicide, andtherefore cost, may be required to adequately controlweeds in a delayed-flood or unflooded system. Informationon weed management in dry-seeded rice using the FIRBS islacking. Farmers adopting the FIRBS for cultivation ofrice as an alternative to the conventional method will needweed efficient management methods to help reduceassociated weed competition risk. Surveys in farmers’ fieldsgrowing rice in the FIRBS in the Indo-Gangetic Plainsrevealed both grass and broadleaf weeds in other fields.Thus, it is essential to identify economic and effectiveherbicides and herbicide combinations for managing weedsin dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS. Hence, two studies wereconducted. One was aimed at identifying appropriatemethods of managing broadleaf weeds alone; the otherwas aimed at managing a mixed population of both grassand broadleaf weeds in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS,effectively and economically.
2. Materials and methods
Two field experiments were conducted for two years(2003 and 2004) at the experimental farm of the SardarVallab Bhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technol-ogy, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India (29140Nand 771460E), at an elevation of 237m above mean sealevel. The climate of Modipuram is broadly classified assemi-arid subtropical, characterized by very hot summers
and cold winters. The hottest months are May and June,when the maximum temperature reaches 45–46 1C,whereas, during December and January, the coldestmonths of the year, the minimum temperature often goesbelow 5 1C. The average annual rainfall is 863mm, 75–80%of which is received through the northwest monsoonduring July–September. The experimental soil is silty loamin texture. The particle density of the soil is 2.65Mgm�3.The mean weight diameter of soil aggregates is 0.71mm,indicating a poorly developed soil structure, mainlybecause the soil reclaimed recently was alkali (sodic) innature. Soil (0–15 cm) retained 18% and 7% moisture(mass basis) at 30 and 1500 kPa suction, with plant-available water capacity of 11%. The soil reaction wasalkaline, with very low salt content. The surface soil(0–15 cm) has 0.83% total carbon, 0.09% total N,25mgkg�1 Olsen’s P, and 0.314meq 100 g�1 1N NH4OAC-extractable K. The DTPA-extractable Zn, Cu, Fe, andMn were in the high range in the surface soil layer.The experimental herbicide treatments included the
following: bensulfuron, cyhalofop butyl, 2,4-D (ester),ethoxysulfuron, pendimethalin, pretilachlor+safener, pro-panil, triclopyr, and almix (chlorimuron+metsulfuron).Specific details of each of the experiments follow.
2.1. Experiment 1. Evaluation of different herbicides for
controlling broadleaf weeds in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS
A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with threereplications was used. The plots were 4.0m long with fourbeds (2.7m) in width. Eight treatments were included. Thetreatments are listed in Table 1. All the herbicides wereapplied at 21 DAS. Herbicides were applied using aknapsack sprayer with a flat fan nozzle and water ascarrier at 400 l ha�1. The grass weeds in the experimentalplots were controlled by pre-emergence application ofpendimethalin at 1.0 kg ha�1 at 3 DAS. Broadleaf weeddensity and dry weight data were collected at 30 and 60DAS. The grass weeds that emerged were removedmanually. Six hand weedings were done to maintain aweed-free situation in the weed-free treatment.
2.2. Experiment 2. Identifying effective herbicides for
managing a mixed population of grass and broadleaf
weeds in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS
A RCBD with three replications was used. The plotswere 4.0m long with four beds (2.7m) in width. Eighttreatments were included. The treatments are listed inTable 5. Weed density and weed dry weight data werecollected at 45 and 75 DAS. One hand weeding was done inall treatments at 45 DAS. Six hand weedings were done tomaintain a weed-free situation in the weed-free treatment.For both experiments, rice (cv. NDR 359, a medium-
long duration variety) was planted in June and harvested inOctober in each year. Land preparation with a tractorconsisted of four ploughings (two times with a disc harrow
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 1
Density (no.m�2) and dry weight (gm�2) of broad leaf weeds in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS as affected by different weed control treatmentsa,b
Treatmentc 30 DAS 60 DAS
Density Dry weight Density Dry weight
No.m�2 % Control gm�2 % Control No.m�2 % Control gm�2 % Control
Weedy 89 a 18.8 a 110 a 71.5 a
Weed-free 0 f 100 0 e 100 0 f 100 0 e 100
Triclopyr (500) 21 DAS 13 d 85.4 2.7 c 85.6 34 c 69.1 21.4 b 70.1
Triclopyr (1000) 21 DAS 6 e 93.3 1.0 d 94.7 23 d 79.1 17.1 c 76.1
Triclopyr (1500) 21 DAS 1 f 98.9 0.6 d 96.8 9 e 91.8 4.7 d 93.4
Bensulfuron (60) 21 DAS 38 b 57.3 8.4 b 55.3 21 b 80.9 19.9 b 72.2
Ethoxysulfuron (18) 21 DAS 26 c 70.8 5.4 c 71.3 12 c 89.1 6 d 91.6
2,4-D (ester) (500) 21 DAS 13 d 85.4 0.8 d 95.7 25 d 77.3 18.9 c 73.6
aIn a column, means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at the 5% level by DMRT.bData are average of two years (2003 and 2004).cDAS ¼ days after seeding, herbicide rate in g a.i. ha–1 indicated in parentheses.
Table 2
Density (no.m�2) and percentage control in density of broadleaf weeds as affected by different weed control treatments in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBSa
Wed species Density (D) and % control (% C)
Weedy Weed free Triclopyr (500)b Triclopyr (1000)c Triclopyr (1500)d Bensulfurone Ethoxysulfuronf 2,4-D (Ester)g
D D % C D % C D % C D % C D % C D % C D % C
C. axillaris 26 0 100 4 85 2 92 0 100 12 54 5 81 4 85
E. prostrata 15 0 100 1 93 0 100 0 100 5 67 1 93 0 100
E. hirta 10 0 100 1 90 0 100 0 100 6 40 5 50 0 100
T. portulacastrum 8 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 4 50 3 63 1 88
Lindernia spp. 10 0 100 1 90 1 90 1 90 1 90 0 100 1 90
P. oleracea 7 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 3 57 2 71 1 86
C. benghalensis 8 0 100 3 63 0 100 0 100 3 63 4 50 2 75
Other broadleaf weeds 6 0 100 2 67 1 83 0 100 3 50 4 33 2 67
Total 89 0 100 13 85 5 94 1 99 38 57 25 72 13 85
aData are average of two years (2003 and 2004).bTriclopyr (500) 21 DAS.cTriclopyr (1000) 21 DAS.dTriclopyr (1500) 21 DAS.eBensulfuron (60) 21 DAS.fEthoxysulfuron (18) 21 DAS.g2,4-D (ester) (500) 21 DAS ( DAS ¼ days after seeding, herbicide rate in g a.i. ha–1 indicated in parentheses).
S. Singh et al. / Crop Protection 25 (2006) 487–495 489
and two times with a cultivator) and one planking. Afterpreparation of the field, beds 37 cm wide with a furrow of30 cm were formed with the help of a tractor-drawn bedplanter. The rice was direct dry-seeded at 30 kg ha�1 in tworows per bed at 25-cm spacing using a tractor-drawn bedplanter. After seeding, irrigation was applied up to the toplevel of the beds and then subsequent irrigations wereapplied to make the soil saturated up to 1 month. Later,irrigation was applied at an interval of 4–5 days when therewas no rain. The N was applied at 150 kg ha�1 in threesplits, 1/3 each as basal, 42DAS, and 65DAS. Phosphorusat 60 kg P2O5 ha
�1 was applied with the bed planter duringseeding. Potash at 60 kg K2Oha�1 and zinc at 25 kg ha�1
ZnSO4 were broadcast in all plots uniformly before ricesowing.
Weed count, for estimating weed density, was recordedwith the help of a quadrant (0.5� 0.7m) placed randomlyat two spots in each plot. To record weed dry weight, weedswere cut at ground level, washed with tap water, sun dried,dried at 70 1C for 48 h, and then weighed. The data ofactual number of weeds were transformed by angulartransformation for statistical analyses. Grain yield wastaken from a 6-m2 area in the center of each plot andexpressed in Mgha�1 at 14% moisture.The statistical analysis of the data was done using
IRRISTAT Windows Version 4.1. The combined analysisof two years revealed that the year effect was notsignificant. Hence, mean data of two years were analyzed.Unless indicated otherwise, differences were consideredsignificant at pp0:05.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 3
Grain yield and yield parameters of dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS as affected by different weed control treatmentsa,b
Treatmentc Grain yield (Mgha�1) Straw yield (Mgha�1) Panicles (m�2) Panicle length (cm) Grains (panicle�1)
Weedy 1.81d 3.06 c 128.3 b 21.18 c 75 c
Weed-free 5.21 a 7.80 a 216.8 a 24.37 a 129 a
Triclopyr (500) 21 DAS 4.47 b 7.07 ab 205.5 a 23.62 ab 113 a
Triclopyr (1000) 21 DAS 4.20 b 6.23 b 198.5 a 23.33 ab 113 a
Triclopyr (1500) 21 DAS 3.56 c 6.12 b 183.8 a 20.51 c 100 b
Bensulfuron (60) 21 DAS 4.63 b 6.44 b 194.5 a 22.98 ab 113 a
Ethoxysulfuron (18) 21 DAS 4.93ab 6.71 b 215.8 a 23.80 a 113 a
2,4-D (ester) (500) 21 DAS 4.46 b 6.46 b 206.7 a 22.63 b 113 a
aIn a column, means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at the 5% level by DMRT.bData are average of two years (2003 and 2004).cAs in Table 1.
Table 4
Cost and return analysis of different weed control treatments used for
managing broadleaf weeds in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBSa,b
Treatmentc Total costd
(US$)
Gross income
(US$)
Net income
(US$)
Weedy 397 218 �179
Weed-free 526 609 83
Triclopyr (500) 21 DAS NCAa 537 NCA
Triclopyr (1000) 21 DAS NCA 504 NCA
Triclopyr (1500) 21 DAS NCA 427 NCA
Bensulfuron (60) 21 DAS NCA 556 NCA
Ethoxysulfuron (18) 21 DAS 434 592 158
2,4- D (ester) (500) 21 DAS 428 550 122
aNCA ¼ not commercially available.bData are average of two years (2003 and 2004).cAs in Table 1.d1 US$ ¼ Rs. 45, hand weeding ¼ US$1.29 personday�1, ethoxysulfur-
on ¼ US$11.10 ha–1, 2,4-D ¼ US$4.66ha–1.
S. Singh et al. / Crop Protection 25 (2006) 487–495490
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Experiment 1. Evaluation of different herbicides for
controlling broadleaf weeds in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS
The major broadleaf weeds associated with the dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS of this experiment were Caesulia
axillaris Roxb., Euphorbia hirta L., Lindernia sp., Comme-
lina benghalensis L., Eclipta prostrata (L.) L., Trianthema
portulacastrum L., and Portulaca oleracea L.All herbicide treatments resulted in lower weed density
and biomass than the weedy check. Triclopyr (1000 and1500 g a.i. ha–1) was superior to other herbicides inreducing weed density at 30 DAS (Table 1). 2,4-D (ester)was as effective as triclopyr in reducing weed dry weight atthat stage. Ethoxysulfuron and triclopyr (1500 g a.i. ha –1)were equally effective in reducing weed dry weight at 60DAS. Ethoxysulfuron was reported to be effective incontrolling a wide range of broadleaf weeds as well asperennial sedges, alone (Beaty et al., 1993; Hess and Rose,1995) or in combination with anilofos (Nagappa et al.,2002). The percentage control in density of individualweeds (mean of two years) as affected by different weedcontrol treatments at 30 DAS is given in Table 2. C.
axillaris was the predominant broadleaf weed in the weedycheck. Triclopyr (1500 g a.i. ha–1) achieved 100% control ofall major weeds in both years, except for Lindernia sp.,whose density was reduced by 90%. Triclopyr (1000 ga.i. ha –1) and ethoxysulfuron caused a 92% and 81%reduction in density of C. axillaris. The density of E.
prostrata was reduced by more than 93% by all studiedherbicides except bensulfuron which caused a 67% reduc-tion in density of E. prostrata. Bensulfuron was reported tobe effective on broadleaf weeds (Baldwin et al., 2001). Lowefficacy of bensulfuron in this experiment can be attributedto late application timing of bensulfuron tested in thisexperiment.
The yields of rice with all herbicide treatments werehigher than that of the weedy check (Table 3). Ethox-ysulfuron as a post-emergence treatment effectively keptbroadleaf weeds under control, resulting in grain yield
comparable with that of the weed-free treatment. Effectiveweed control and improved grain and straw yields withethoxysulfuron were earlier reported in transplanted rice(Bhowmick and Ghosh, 2002) and wet-seeded rice (Sainiand Angiras, 2002). Rice grain and straw yield with otherherbicide treatments did not differ from one another,except with triclopyr (1500 g a.i. ha–1). Triclopyr at 1500 ga.i. ha�1 was phytotoxic to rice and hence lesser yield wasrecorded, in spite of superiority in reducing weed densityand dry weight. Rice crop susceptibility has been animportant concern with triclopyr in the US (Scherder et al.,2000). Straw yield did not differ among herbicidetreatments. The yield data (Table 3) indicated thatphytotoxicity of triclopyr at 1500 g a.i. ha–1 resulted in asignificant reduction in panicle length and grains perpanicle of rice when compared with that of othertreatments. Based on these observations, it can beconcluded that triclopyr at 500 g a.i. ha�1, bensulfuron at60 g a.i. ha–1, ethoxysulfuron at 18 g a.i. ha–1, and 2,4-D(ester) at 500 g a.i. ha�1 were equally effective in achievinghigher grain yields by controlling broadleaf weeds in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS.
ARTICLE IN PRESSTable
5
Density
(no.m�2)ofgrass
andbroadleafweedsin
dry-seeded
rice
intheFIR
BS,asaffectedbydifferentweedcontroltreatm
entsa,b
Treatm
entc
45DAS
75DAS
Grass
weeds
% Control
Broad
leaf
% Control
Total
% Control
Grass
weeds
% Control
Broad
leaf
% Control
Total
% Control
Weedy
104a
24a
128a
178a
43a
221a
Weed-free
0f
100
0e
100
0g
100
0h
100
0f
100
0e
100
Pendim
ethalinfb
chlorimuron+metsulfuron(1000fb
4)3fb
21DAS
19e
81.7
9cd
62.5
28f
78.1
23g
87.1
10d
76.7
33d
85.1
Pretilachlorwithsafener
fb
chlorimuron+metsulfuron(500fb
4)3fb
21DAS
35d
66.3
8cd
66.7
43e
66.4
29f
83.7
6e
86.0
35d
84.1
Cyhalofopbutylfb
triclopyr(120fb
500)14fb
28
DAS
50c
51.9
14b
41.7
64c
50
35e
80.3
16c
62.8
49c
77.8
Cyhalofopbutyl+
triclopyr(120+
500)14DAS
70b
32.7
13b
45.8
83b
35.2
53b
70.2
24b
44.2
79b
64.3
Propanilfb
triclopyr(1750fb
500)14fb
28DAS
60c
42.3
13b
45.8
73c
43
43d
75.8
20c
53.5
63bc
71.5
Propanil+
triclopyr(1750+
500)14DAS
51c
51
7d
70.8
58d
54.7
47c
73.6
20c
53.5
67bc
69.7
Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl+
ethoxysulfuron(50+
18)21
DAS
34d
67.3
10c
58.3
44e
65.6
23g
87.1
12d
72.1
35d
84.1
aIn
acolumn,meansfollowed
byacommonletter
are
notsignificantlydifferentatthe5%
level
byDMRT.
bData
are
averageoftw
oyears
(2003and2004).
cDAS¼
daysafter
seeding,fb¼
followed
by,herbiciderate
inga.i.ha–1indicatedin
parentheses.
Table
6
Dry
weight(gm�2)ofgrass
andbroadleafweedsin
dry-seeded
rice
intheFIR
BSasaffectedbydifferentweedcontroltreatm
entsa,b
Treatm
entc
45DAS
75DAS
Grass
% Control
Broad
leaf
% Control
Total
% Control
Grass
% Control
Broad
leaf
% Control
Total
% Control
Weedy
209.1
a9.8
a218.9
a416.8a
36.4a
453.2
a
Weed-Free
0g
100
0d
100
0g
100
0g
100
0f
100
0h
100
Pendim
ethalinfb
chlorimuron+metsulfuron(1000fb
4)3fb
21DAS
64.1
e69.3
3.6
b63.6
67.7
e69.1
63.8
e84.7
10.6
e70.8
74.4
f83.6
Pretilachlor+
safener
fbchlorimuron+metsulfuron
(500fb
4)3fb
21DAS
80.2
d61.6
1.7
c82.7
81.9
d62.6
86.3
d79.3
7.3
f79.9
93.6
e79.3
Cyhalofopbutylfb
triclopyr(120fb
500)14fb
28
DAS
67.9
e67.5
4.5
b54.1
72.4
e66.9
111.4
c73.3
15.6
d57.1
127d
72
Cyhalofopbutyl+
triclopyr(120+
500)14DAS
105.2
b49.7
3.9
b60.
109.1
b50.1
137.9
b66.9
21.6
b40.7
159.5
b64.8
Propanilfb
triclopyr(1750fb
500)14fb
28DAS
94.9
c54.6
4.9
b50
99.8
c54.4
110.3
c73.5
17.5
c51.9
127.8d
71.8
Propanil+
triclopyr(1750+
500)14DAS
93.5
c55.3
1.8
c81.6
95.3
c56.5
114.8
c72.5
20.5
b43.7
135.3c
70.1
Fenoxyprop-p-ethyl+
ethoxysulfuron(50+
18)21
DAS
56.8
f72.8
2.4
c75.5
59.2
f72.9
34.1
f91.8
11.6
e68.1
45.7
g89.9
aIn
acolumn,meansfollowed
byacommonletter
are
notsignificantlydifferentatthe5%
level
byDMRT.
bData
are
averageoftw
oyears
(2003and2004).
cAsin
Table
5.
S. Singh et al. / Crop Protection 25 (2006) 487–495 491
ARTICLE IN PRESSS. Singh et al. / Crop Protection 25 (2006) 487–495492
Economic analysis was done for the herbicides that arecurrently available to the farmers in the market (Table 4).Net returns were higher with ethoxysulfurn at 18 g a.i. ha–1.The next best was 2,4-D (ester) at 500 g a.i. ha�1, whichalso recorded higher net returns than the weed-freetreatment. 2,4-D can be applied only between tilleringand panicle initiation (Anonymous, 1997). In areas whererice is grown in proximity to cotton, triclopyr is used tominimize potential cotton injury (Beaty et al., 1993). Thisstudy thus reveals that ethoxysulfuron can be used foreffective and economical control of broadleaf weeds in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS.
3.2. Experiment 2. Identifying effective herbicides for
managing a mixed population of grass and broadleaf weeds
in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS
The major weeds associated with dry-seeded rice in theFIRBS during both years were Echinochloa crus-galli (L.)P. Beauv., Echinochloa colona (L.) Link, Dactyloctenium
aegyptium (L.) Willd, Leptochloa panicea (Retz.) Ohwlamong grasses; and C. axillaris, E. hirta, Lindernia sp., C.
benghalensis, E. prostrata, T. portulacastrum, and P.
oleracea among weeds.The density and biomass of grass and broadleaf weeds
with all the weed control treatments at all stages were lowerthan those of the weedy check (Tables 5 and 6). None of
Table 7
Density and percentage reduction in density of grass and broadleaf weeds at 30
in the FIRBSa
Weed species Density (D) and % control (% C)
Weedy
check
Weed
free
Pendi
fb AmxbPreti
fb Amxc
D D % C D % C D % C
E. crus-galli 47 0 100 7 85 13 72
E. colona 47 0 100 6 87 10 79
D. aegyptium 14 0 100 3 79 6 57
L. panicea 8 0 100 2 75 4 50
Other grasses 2 0 100 1 50 2 0
C. axillaries 8 0 100 2 75 1 88
E. prostrata 5 0 100 1 80 1 80
E. hirta 2 0 100 1 50 2 0
T. portulacastrum 2 0 100 2 0 1 50
Lindernia spp. 2 0 100 0 100 0 100
P. oleracea 1 0 100 0 100 0 100
C. benghalensis 2 0 100 1 50 0 100
Other broadleaf weeds 2 0 100 1 50 1 50
aData are average of two years (2003 and 2004).bPendimethalin fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron (1000 fb 4) 3 fb 21 DAS.cPretilachlor with safener fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron (500 fb 4) 3 fb 21 DdCyhalofop butyl fb triclopyr (120 fb 500) 14 fb 28 DAS.eCyhalofop butyl+triclopyr (120+500) 14 DAS.fPropanil fb triclopyr (1750 fb 500) 14 fb 28 DAS.gPropanil+triclopyr (1750+500) 14 DAS.hFenoxaprop-p-ethyl+ethoxysulfuron (50+18) 21 DAS (DAS ¼ days af
parentheses).
the herbicide treatments was as effective as the weed-freetreatment in reducing the density and biomass of weeds.Pendimethalin followed by (fb) chlorimuron+metsulfur-on, pretilachlor+safener fb chlorimuron+metsulfuronand fenoxaprop-p-ethyl+ethoxysulfuron were equally ef-fective in reducing total weed density at 75 DAS. Thedensity of both grass and broadleaf weeds was effectivelyreduced by these herbicide combinations. However, a lowertotal weed dry weight was observed with fenoxaprop-p-ethyl+ethoxysulfuron at 75 DAS. The next highestreduction in total weed dry weight was recorded withpendimethalin fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron and pretila-chlor+safener fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron at 75 DAS.Pendimethalin was reported to give the best grass weedcontrol (Estorninos and Moody, 1988; Joseph et al., 1990).When multiple weed problems exist, it becomes advanta-geous to use a mixture of herbicides to control bothbroadleaf and grass weeds (Brommer et al., 2000).Controlling broadleaf weeds and grasses is critical for
achieving maximum rice yields (Hill and Smith, 1990). Thedensity of individual weeds at 30 DAS (Table 7) revealedthat E. crus-galli, E. colona, D. aegyptium and L. panicea
were the predominant weeds. A greater reduction indensity of E. crus-galli occurred with pendimethalin fbchlorimuron+metsulfuron (85%) and pretilachlor+saf-ener fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron (72%) and the leastwith cyhalofop butyl+triclopyr (26%). E. colona density
days after seeding, with different weed control treatments in dry-seeded rice
Cyhal
fb TricdCyhal +
TricePropa
fb TricfPropa+
TricgFenoxa+
Ethoxyh
D % C D % C D % C D % C D % C
26 45 35 26 26 45 21 55 15 68
7 85 19 60 16 66 14 70 8 83
8 43 8 43 9 36 7 50 4 71
6 25 6 25 5 38 6 25 4 50
3 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 1 50
3 63 3 63 2 75 2 75 3 63
2 60 0 100 2 60 0 100 0 100
1 50 2 0 0 100 0 100 3 0
1 50 0 100 1 50 0 100 1 50
1 50 2 0 2 0 1 50 0 100
1 0 0 100 2 0 0 100 0 100
2 0 3 0 1 50 1 50 2 0
2 0 2 0 2 0 1 50 0 100
AS.
ter seeding, fb-followed by, herbicide rate in g a.i. ha–1 indicated in
ARTICLE IN PRESSS. Singh et al. / Crop Protection 25 (2006) 487–495 493
was reduced by more than 80% with pendimethalin fbchlorimuron+metsulfuron, cyhalofop butyl fb triclopyrand fenoxaprop-p-ethyl+ethoxysulfuron. Pendimethalinfb chlorimuron+metsulfuron (79%), fenoxaprop-p-ethy-l+ethoxysulfuron (71%) and pretilachlor+safener fbchlorimuron+metsulfuron (57%) were more effective inreducing density of D. aegyptium. All herbicides caused lessthan 50% reduction in the density of L. paniceae, except
Pendimethalin fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron, which caused75% reduction. Higher reduction in density of broadleafweed C. axillaris was obtained with pretilachlor+safenerfb chlorimuron+metsulfuron (88%), pendimethalin fbchlorimuron+metsulfuron (75%), propanil+triclopyr(75%) and propanil fb triclopyr (75%).
Rice yields with all herbicide combinations tested werehigher than that with the weedy check and lower than withthe weed-free treatment (Table 8). Yields with pendimetha-lin fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron, pretilachlor+safener fbchlorimuron+metsulfuron, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl+ethoxy-
Table 9
Cost and return analysis of different weed control treatments used for manag
Treatmentc
Weedy
Weed-free
Pendimethalin fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron (1000 fb 4) 3 fb 21 DAS
Pretilachlor with safener fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron (500 fb 4) 3 fb 21 DAS
Cyhalofop butyl fb triclopyr (120 fb 500) 14 fb 28 DAS
Cyhalofop butyl+triclopyr (120+500) 14 DAS
Propanil fb triclopyr (1750 fb 500) 14 fb 28 DAS
Propanil+triclopyr (1750+500 g) 14 DAS
Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl+ethoxysulfuron (50+18) 21 DAS
aNCA ¼ not commercially available in India.bData are average of two years (2003 and 2004).cAs in Table 5.d1 US$ ¼ Rs.45 (values adjusted to nearest US$), hand weeding ¼ U
on ¼ US$11.1 ha–1, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl ¼ US$16.67 ha–1, pendimethalin ¼ US
Table 8
Grain yield, straw yield, and yield parameters of dry-seeded rice in the FIRBS
and broadleaf weedsa,b
Treatmentc Grain yield
(Mgha�1)
St
(M
Weedy 1.24 e 2.3
Weed-free 5.23 a 6.3
Pendimethalin fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron (1000 fb 4)
3 fb 21 DAS
4.40 bc 5.7
Pretilachlor with safener fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron
(500 fb 4) 3 fb 21 DAS
4.27 bc 5.7
Cyhalofop butyl fb triclopyr (120 fb 500) 14 fb 28 DAS 3.78 cd 5.1
Cyhalofop butyl+triclopyr (120+500) 14 DAS 3.36 d 4.2
Propanil fb triclopyr (1750 fb 500) 14 fb 28 DAS 4.06 c 5.1
Propanil+triclopyr (1750+500) 14 DAS 4.37 bc 5.3
Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl+ethoxysulfuron (50+18) 21 DAS 4.66 b 5.7
aIn a column, means followed by a common letter are not significantly diffbData are average of two years (2003 and 2004).cAs in Table 5.
sulfuron, and propanil+triclopyr did not differ signifi-cantly. Increased yield through effective weed controlwas earlier reported with fenoxyprop ethyl (Lourenset al., 1989). The grain yield of dry-seeded rice in theFIRBS with weed-free treatment was more than in otherweed control treatments. Among herbicide treatments, thelowest grain and straw yields were observed with cyhalofopbutyl+triclopyr. This can be attributed to the phytotoxicityof triclopyr. Panicles number in the weedy check waslower. Rice 1000-grain weight with fenoxaprop-p-ethy-l+ethoxysulfuron and that of the weed-free treatment didnot differ.A cost and return analysis (Table 9) indicated the highest
net income with fenoxaprop-p-ethyl+ethoxysulfuron(50+18 g a.i. ha�1) applied at 21 DAS. The next highestnet return was with pendimethalin fb chlorimuron+met-sulfuron (1000 fb 4 g a.i. ha�1) applied at 3 fb 21 DAS.Both of them recorded higher net returns than the weed-free treatment.
ing grass and broadleaf weeds in dry-seeded rice in the FIRBSa,b
Total expenses
(US$)dGross income
(US$)
Net income
(US$)
397 149 �248
552 628 76
432 529 97
441 513 72
NCAa 403 NCA
NCA 403 NCA
NCA 487 NCA
NCA 525 NCA
444 559 115
S$1.29 day�1, chlorimuron+metsulfuron ¼ US$9.16ha–1, ethoxysulfur-
$6.67 ha–1, pretilachlor with safener ¼ US$15.56 ha–1.
as affected by different weed control treatments used for managing grass
raw yield
g ha�1)
Panicles
(m�2)
Panicle
length (cm)
Grains
(panicle�1)
1000-grain
weight g
5 e 131 c 20.5 c 86 b 25.1 b
1 a 271 a 23.6 a 107 a 27.4 a
3 b 244 ab 22.9 a 107 a 26.0 b
1 b 220 b 21.6 bc 102 ab 25.5 b
0 c 234 b 21.9 b 99 ab 25.8 b
4 d 230 b 21.8 bc 93 ab 25.8 b
9 c 241 ab 21.5 bc 102 ab 25.8 b
7 c 253 ab 21.8 bc 103 ab 25.7 b
1 b 237 b 22.3 a 99 ab 26.5 a
erent at the 5% level by DMRT.
ARTICLE IN PRESSS. Singh et al. / Crop Protection 25 (2006) 487–495494
A practice commonly used today is the application oftwo or more herbicides sequentially or in combination tobroaden the spectrum of weed control, reduce productioncosts, and/or prevent the development of weeds resistant tocertain herbicides (Bruff and Shaw, 1992; Zhang et al.,1995; Kelly and Coats, 1999). It can be concluded fromthese studies that effective control of both grass andbroadleaf weeds and higher grain yield and net returns ofdry-seeded rice in the FIRBS could be attained byapplication of either fenoxaprop-p-ethyl+ethoxysulfuron(50+18 g a.i. ha�1) at 21 DAS, fb one hand weeding at 45DAS or pendimethalin fb chlorimuron+metsulfuron (1000fb 4 g a.i. ha�1) applied at 3 fb 21 DAS fb one handweeding at 45 DAS. In fields where broadleaf weedspredominate, ethoxysulfuron alone could be used. Selec-tion of weed control measures based on the weed flora indry-seeded rice in the FIRBS would enable farmers tocontrol weeds with lower cost.
References
Anonymous, 1997. Louisiana’s Suggested Chemical Weed Control Guide.
Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service Publication 1565 (3.5M).
Louisiana State University Agriculture Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
Balasubramanian, V., Ladha, J.K., Gupta, R.K., Naresh, R.K., Mehla,
R.S., Singh, B., Singh, Y., 2003. Technical options for rice in the
rice–wheat system in South Asia. In: Ladha, J.K., Hill, J.E., Duxbury,
J.M., Gupta, R.K., Buresh, R.J. (Eds.), Improving the Productivity
and Sustainability of Rice–Wheat Systems: Issues and Impacts. ASA
Special Publication No. 65. American Society of Agronomy, Crop
Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, USA,
pp. 115–147.
Baldwin, F.L., Smith, K.L., Talbert, R.E., 2001. A Comparison of Permit,
Londax, and Mixtures for Control of Yellow Nutsedge and Broadleaf
Weeds in Rice. Research Series Arkansas Agricultural Experiment
Station, No. 485, pp. 53–57.
Beaty, J.D., Guy, B., Edmund Jr., R.M., 1993. Broadleaf weed control
and cotton response with bensulfuron in rice. Proc. South Weed Sci.
Soc. 46, 91.
Bhowmick, M.K., Ghosh, R.K., 2002. Relative efficacy of herbicides
against weed incidence in summer rice. Adv. Plant Sci. 15, 499–503.
Borrell, A., Garside, A., Fukai, S., 1997. Improving efficiency of water use
for irrigated rice in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crops Res.
52, 231–248.
Bouman, B.A.M., Tuong, T.P., 2001. Field water management to save
water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice. Agric.
Water Manage. 65, 11–30.
Brommer, C.L., Shaw, D.R., Duke, S.O., Reddy, K.N., Willeford, K.O.,
2000. Antagonism of BAS 625 by selected broadleaf herbicides and the
role of ethanol. Weed Sci. 48, 181–187.
Bruff, S.A., Shaw, D.R., 1992. Tank-mix combinations for weed control in
stale seedbed soybean (glycine max). Weed Technol. 6, 45–51.
Castin, E.M., Moody, K., 1985. Weed control in dry-seeded wetland rice
as affected by time and method of tillage. In: Proceedings of the 10th
Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Chiangmai, Thailand,
pp. 645–661.
Chauhan, D.S., Sharma, R.K., Kharub, A.S., Tripathi, S.C., Chhokar,
R.S., 2000. Cost effective wheat production technologies. Research
Bulletin No. 5, Directorate of Wheat Research, Karnal, Haryana,
India, 24pp.
Elliot, P.C., Navarez, D.C., Estario, D.B., Moody, K., 1984. Determining
suitable weed control practices for dry-seeded rice. Philipp. J. Weed
Sci. 11, 70–82.
Estorninos Jr., L.E., Moody, K., 1988. Evaluation of herbicides for weed
control in dry-seeded wetland rice (Oryza sativa). Philipp. J. Weed Sci.
15, 50–58.
Fujisaka, S., Moody, K., Ingram, K., 1993. A descriptive study of farming
practices for dry seeded rainfed lowland rice in India, Indonesia and
Myanmar. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 45, 115–128.
Gupta, R.K., Naresh, R.K., Hobbs, P.R., Jiaguo, Z., Ladha, J.K., 2003.
Sustainability of post-green revolution agriculture: the rice–wheat
cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains and China. In: Ladha,
J.K., Hill, J.E., Ladha, J.K., Duxbury, J.M., Gupta, R.K, Buresh, R.J.
(Eds.), Improving the Productivity and Sustainability of Rice–wheat
Systems: Issues and Impacts. ASA Special Publication No. 65.
American Society of Agronomy, Crop science Society of America,
Soil science society of America, USA, pp. 1–25.
Hess, M., Rose, R., 1995. HOE 095404: a new herbicide for broadleaf
weed and sedge control in rice. In: Brighton Crop Protection
Conference: Weeds. Proceedings of the International Conference,
Brighton, UK, vol. 2, 20–23 November 1995, pp. 763–768.
Hill, J.E., Smith Jr., R.J., 1990. Weed control technology in US rice. In:
Grayson, B.T., Green, M.B., Copping, L.D. (Eds.), Pest Manage-
ment in Rice. Elsevier Scientific Publications Ltd., London, UK,
pp. 314–327.
Janiya, J.D., Moody, K., 1988. Effect of time of planting, crop
establishment method, and weed control method on weed growth
and rice yield. Philipp. J. Weed Sci. 15, 6–17.
Joseph, K., Tomy, P.J., Nair, N.R., 1990. Relative efficacy of different
herbicides for control of weeds in dry seeded low land rice. Oryza 27,
199–201.
Kelly, S.T., Coats, G.E., 1999. Influence of fertilizer particle size on
efficacy of dithiopyr, prodiamine, oryzalin, and oxadiazon for south-
ern crabgrasss (Digitaria ciliaris) control. Weed Technol. 13, 385–389.
Ladha, J.K., Dowe, D., Pathak, H., Padre, A.T., Yadav, R.L., Singh, B.,
Singh, Y., Singh, P., Kunder, A.L., Sakal, R., Ram, N., Regmi, A.P.,
Gami, S.K., Bhandari, A.L., Amin, R., Yadav, C.R., Bhattaria, E.M.,
Das, S., Aggarwal, H.P., Gupta, R.K., Hobbs, P.R., 2003. How
extensive are yield declines in long term rice–wheat experiments in
Asia. Field Crops Res. 81, 159–180.
Lourens, J.H., Arceo, M.B., Datud, F.S., 1989. Fenoxyprop ethyl (Whip)
and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Whip-S) for grass control in direct seeded rice
under rainfed conditions in the Philippines. In: Proceedings of the 12th
Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Manila, Philippines,
pp. 291–301.
Malik, R.K., Yadav, A., Hobbs, P.R., Sardana, P.K., Bellinder, R., Van
Gessel, M., 2003. Integrated weed management and conservation
agriculture in the Indian rice–wheat cropping system. In: Proceedings
of the 57th Annual Meeting of the North eastern Weed Science
Society, Baltimore, MD, USA, pp. 36–142.
Moorthy, B.T.S., Manna, G.B., 1993. Studies on weed control in direct
seeded upland rainfed rice. Indian J. Agric. Res. 27, 175–180.
Nagappa, N., Naresh, D., Biradar, D.P., 2002. Efficiency of different
herbicides to control weeds and its impact on yield in direct seeded
rice of Tunga Bhadra project area. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 15,
359–361.
Pellerin, K.J., Webster, E.P., 2004. Imazethapyr at different rates and
timings in drill and water seeded imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed
Technol. 18, 223–227.
Saini, J.P., Angiras, N.N., 2002. Evaluation of ethoxysulfuron against
broad-leaved weeds and sedges in direct seeded puddled rice.
Indian J. Weed Sci. 34, 36–38.
Scherder, E.F., Talbert, R.E., Schmidt, L.A., Lovelace, M.L., 2000.
Clomazone for Control of Propanil-resistant and -susceptible Barn-
yard Grass in Rice. Research Series, Arkansas Agricultural Experi-
ment Station, No. 476, pp. 116–130.
Sharma, R.K., Singh, R., 2002. Furrow irrigated raised bed planting
system: an efficient input usage production technology. Indian Fmg.
52, 25–26.
Sharma, P.K., Bhushan, L., Ladha, J.K., Naresh, R.K., Gupta, R.K.,
Balasubramanian, B.V., Bouman, B.A.M., 2002. Crop water relations
ARTICLE IN PRESSS. Singh et al. / Crop Protection 25 (2006) 487–495 495
in rice–wheat cropping under different tillage systems and water
management practices in a marginally sodic, medium-textured soil. In:
Bouman, B.A.M., Hengsdijk, H., Hardy, B., Toung, T.P., Ladha, J.K.
(Eds.), Water-wise Rice Production. Proceedings of the International
Workshop on Water-Wise Rice Production, 11 April 2002, Los Banos,
Philippines, pp. 223–235.
Singh, V. P., Singh, G., Singh, S.P., Kumar, A., Singh, Y., Johnson, D.E.,
Mortimer, M., 2005. Effect of rice wheat establishment methods and
weed management in irrigated rice–wheat production system. In:
Workshop on ‘‘Direct Seeded Rice in the Rice–wheat System of the
Indo-Gangetic Plains’’, 1 February to 2 February 2005, G.B. Pant
University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar, U.S. Nagar,
Uttaranchal, India, p. 12.
Zhang, J., Hamill, A.S., Weaver, S.E., 1995. Antagonism and synergism
between herbicides: trends from previous studies. Weed Technol. 9,
86–90.
Top Related