Download - Vicious circle of fish losses, vulnerability of natural resources and … · 2017-11-28 · Vicious circle of ˜sh losses, vulnerability of natural resources and the poverty trap

Transcript
Page 1: Vicious circle of fish losses, vulnerability of natural resources and … · 2017-11-28 · Vicious circle of ˜sh losses, vulnerability of natural resources and the poverty trap

Vicious circle of �sh losses, vulnerability of natural resources and the poverty trapAu

thou

rs

Scope & Purpose Methodology

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

ConclusionsThis poster illustrates the �ndings of a situational

analysis on post-harvest systems conducted in 2013 and2014 in the Volta Basin, a shared water body in West Africa

through the NEPAD-FAO Fish Programme (NFFP), within the framework of a collaborative undertaking between FAO,

the Planning and Coordinating Agency (NPCA) of theNew Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD).

Why the Volta Basin?

(i) The Basin is one of the poorest areas of Africa, thusmaking issues of food and nutrition security a priority

(ii) The ecosystem of the Volta Lake, suggests that climatechange and variability may have an impact, therefore

exacerbating the level of vulnerability.

The study was thus commissioned to identifyine�ciencies in the post-harvest chains, thendevelop elements for sustainable reduction ofpost-harvest losses and greater regional trade.

(iii) The Basin spreads over six West African countries(43% in Burkina Faso, 42% in Ghana, and the remaining 15%

in Togo, Benin, Cote d’Ivoire and Mali).

A stepwise, phased and more inclusive approach: (i) takesinto account the sustainable value chain elements and

(ii) goes beyond the common prism of PHLs occurrence.

Signi�cant PHLs, nearly 30% of the landings, with levelsranging from 13.5% to 45.5% depending on the country.

These �gures are comparable to the average globalestimates of 35% for the loss &wastes of �sh and seafood.

This inclusive approach that fully took into account theelements of the sustainable value chain in the existing

post-harvest loss assessment (PHLA) tools enabledto draw a fairly complete picture of the causes

and e�ects while putting in context the complexpatterns in the occurrence of PHLs.

It is the �rst ever of its kind to raise these intricatemultidimensional issues and clearly establish thecycle of poverty and vulnerability directlyperpetuated within the PHL context.

It highlights that reducing PHLs e�ciently andsustainably requires thinking outside thetechnology and infrastructure box and consideraddressing other important factors that undermineresource sustainability, e�cient and competitivepost-harvest systems and trade.

The strategy was developed to consolidate thee�orts of the countries in reducing PHLs. But overall, the approach followed, the fundamentaldimensions raised, and lessons learned can creategood practices in other geographic contexts. Theywill be useful in informing the implementation ofthe recently endorsed global instrument, theVoluntary Guidelines for Securing SustainableSmall-Scale Fisheries in the Context of FoodSecurity and Poverty Eradication.

The Volta Lake is the largest man-madelake in Africa (8700 km2).

It is a signi�cant source of employment and livelihoods.

Secondary source data review for an overview of thestatus of PHLs, how they are re�ected in the varioussectoral documents. The collated information wereinstrumental in the selection of speci�c sites andvalue chains.

(i) High losses as a result of �sh of poor quality (quality orqualitative �sh loss) or is of illegal size; incommensurate tothe volume of �sh physically removed from the supply chain(physical or quantitative loss), thus concurring previous studies.

(ii) the drivers of PHLs are multifactorial, startingfrom upstream (prevailing conditions in theecosystem within the �shing) all the way to thelevel of consumers: In fact, while 65% of causes arelinked to the lack of improved technology,infrastructure and good manufacturing practices,the other 35% are due to the actors’ socialand cultural dimensions of vulnerability, and thelack of responsible governance, regulations andtheir enforcement;

(iii) Real or potential impact on three levels:

(iv) That coping strategies resulting in further PHLsand interwoven factors have paved the way for avicious circle where the threat to resourcesustainability, �shers’ resilience to climatevariability, food security due to PHLs may lead to increasing the poverty trap.

Primary data collection in selected sites : 4 majorriparian sites in Lake riparian sites in Burkina Faso,Ghana and Togo-between 40-75 percent of theBasin’s outputs (totalling between 70 and 93 percentof the total production share from the Basin of eachof the three countries) were surveyed through:

The check list used in this process mainstreamedsocio-economic issues including:

Subsequent proposed interventions informed aregional strategy aimed to strengthen thee�ciency, competitiveness and sustainability ofthe �sheries in the riparian countries, an instrumentin support of the implementation of the AfricanFisheries and Aquaculture Policy Framework andReform Strategy (AFPF & RS).

The Volta Basin

This geographic coverage and predominance ofsmall-scale �sheries provide the opportunity to document

multiple dimensions in appraising post-harvest losses (PHLs) and �sh trade.

Food securityimpact

Income level of theactors along the

value chain

Environmental impact(sustainability of

natural resources)

Di�erent sizes and poorly

handled Tilapia

The Exploratory Fish Loss Assessment Method, based on theaccelerated method of participatory rural appraisal,Questionnaire Loss Assessment Method (QLAM) to covera variety of parameters. Some load tracking wasconducted on speci�c issues.

Gender Policy Climate change dimensions

Consumer roles Natural resources

Rosenthal, Illia, Independent Consultant,Rome, [email protected]

Diei-Ouadi, Yvette. Food & Fishery Industry O�cer, Fish Products,Trade and Marketing Service, UN Food and Agriculture Organization,Tel: + 39 06 570 53251 – Email: [email protected]

Sodoke, Boris Komivi.B.K.,Independent Consultant,[email protected]

Oduro, Frieda Adjoa, Senior Fishery o�cer,Ministry of Fish. and Aqua. Development, Ghana,[email protected]

Ouedraogo, Yacouba, Specialist/Sociologist,Fisheries and Aqua. General Directorate, Burkina Faso, Email: [email protected]

Bokobosso, Kissem, Ministry of Agricculture, Togo,[email protected]

McDonough, Sakchai, Junior Aquaculture O�cer, UN Food and Agriculture Organization (RAF), GhanaEmail: [email protected] © FAO 2016

the poor asking for cheaper/illegal �sh

VISC

IOU

S CY

CLE

OF

LOSS

ES, V

ULN

ERA

BILI

TY O

F N

ATU

RAL

RESO

URC

ES &

TH

E PO

VERT

Y TR

AP

Impoverished rural consumers

Policy & Regulation

Poor knowledge &handling practices

Ine�cient technologies

Weak infrastructure & services

Poor availability ormanagement of

market information

Gender & other social interests

related determinants

Waste of natural resources/inputs

Fisheries resources dwindlingand changes in

species distribution

Coping Mechanism: Unsustainable �shing practices

Vulnerable & poor �shing communities

Too many people chasing fewer �sh

Higher price of available (good quality) �sh

Lower income

Climate Change

Post-Harvest lossess

DRIVERS

“loss transfer” from �shermen to female operators

a mean to meet market demands

Source: villagevolunteers.org

CO138e/1/06.16