8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
1/52
Upstream Marine
StandardChevron Upstream & Gas (U&G)
One Upstream Marine Standard | One risk management process | Zero incidents
© 2015 by Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Version Date Originator
Rev. 3.1 01-Jan-2015 Marine Safety, Reliability and Efficiency (MSRE) OE Process Advisor / Global Upstream Marine Authority / Upstream MarineManager
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
2/52
Public
©2015 by Chevron Corporation
This document contains proprietary information of Chevron Corporation. Any use of this documentwithout express, prior, written permission from Chevron Corporation and/or its affiliates is prohibited
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
3/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 i
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
Table of Contents
1 Standard ......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1
Purpose and Objectives ....................................................................................... 1
1.2
Compliance with Standards .................................................................................. 1
2
Charter ing of Vessels .................................................................................................... 1
2.1
Introduction........................................................................................................... 1
2.2
Internal User Group Requirements ....................................................................... 1
2.2
Minimum Vessel Bid Requirements ...................................................................... 2
2.3
Mitigation Process for Vessels Below Preferred Specification .............................. 4
2.4
Terminal Support Vessel Operations – Attestation of Fitness ............................... 4
3 Competency ................................................................................................................... 5
3.1
Introduction........................................................................................................... 5
3.2
Key Vessel Personnel .......................................................................................... 5
3.3
Minimum Competency Requirements ................................................................... 5
3.4
Assurance of Competency ................................................................................... 7
3.5
Mitigation Actions If Requirements Are Not Met ................................................... 7
4
Vessel Assurance .......................................................................................................... 9
4.1
Introduction........................................................................................................... 9
4.2
Vessel Inspections................................................................................................ 9
4.3
MODU Marine Inspections ................................................................................. 11
4.4
Upstream Marine Risk Management Process..................................................... 13
4.5
Verification Through Random Inspections .......................................................... 14
4.6 Bulk petroleum - Requirements and jurisdiction. ................................................. 15
4.7
Subsea Installation Vessel Equipment Assurance Requirements (SIVAP) ......... 15
4.8
Strategic & High Impact/Low Probability (HILP) Transportation VerificationStandard ............................................................................................................. 17
5
Safety Culture Development ....................................................................................... 23
5.1
Introduction......................................................................................................... 23
5.2
Pre-contracting Safety Discussions .................................................................... 24
5.3
Safety Orientation ............................................................................................... 24
5.4
Operation Meetings ............................................................................................ 24
5.5 Crew Changes .................................................................................................... 24
5.6
Daily IFO Communication With All Vessels ........................................................ 25
5.7
CHESM/MSW/MSRE Work In Progress Activities integration............................. 25
5.8
Marine Investigation and Reporting (II&R) Reporting for MSRE scope vessels .. 26
5.9
Joint OVMSA Verification & Assessment (JOVA) Protocol ................................. 27
6
Personnel Transfer ...................................................................................................... 30
6.1
Responsibilities and Procedures ........................................................................ 30
6.2
Personnel Transfer by Basket/FROG ................................................................. 31
6.3
Personnel Transfer from Vessel to Vessel at Sea .............................................. 31
6.4
Boat Crew........................................................................................................... 31
6.5
Procedure for Boat Transfer in Specialist Operations ......................................... 31
6.6
Gangway Transfer of Personnel ......................................................................... 31
6.7
Gangway Transfer from Vessel to Shore ............................................................ 32
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
4/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed. ii
6.8
Transfer by Swing Rope ..................................................................................... 32
6.9
Transfer by Pilot Ladder ..................................................................................... 33
7 Cargo Handling ............................................................................................................ 33
7.1
Introduction......................................................................................................... 33
7.2
Containers .......................................................................................................... 33
7.3
Pre-Slung Cargo ................................................................................................. 34
7.4
Critical/Heavy Lifts .............................................................................................. 34
7.5
Tag Lines ........................................................................................................... 34
7.6
Cargo Securing .................................................................................................. 35
7.7
Selective Unloading (Cherry Picking) ................................................................. 36
7.8
Back-Loading Liquid Products from Offshore ..................................................... 36
8
Anchor Handl ing .......................................................................................................... 36
8.1
Introduction......................................................................................................... 36
8.2
General Rule for Anchoring ................................................................................ 36
8.3
Emergency Anchoring ........................................................................................ 37
8.4
Anchoring of Mobile Offshore Units .................................................................... 37
8.5
Written Mooring Operation Procedure ................................................................ 37 8.6
Pre-Move Meetings ............................................................................................ 38
8.7
Minimum Anchor and Mooring Line Clearances ................................................. 38
8.8
Vessels Involved in Anchor Handling Operations ............................................... 39
8.9
Special Considerations ....................................................................................... 39
8.10
Sockets .............................................................................................................. 40
9 Hose Management ....................................................................................................... 40
9.1
Introduction......................................................................................................... 40
9.2
Hose Management ............................................................................................. 40
9.3
Flotation Collars ................................................................................................. 41
9.4
Connectors ......................................................................................................... 41
9.5
Breakaway/Weak link Couplings ........................................................................ 41
10
Vessel and Ins tallation Communicat ion .................................................................... 41
10.1
Introduction......................................................................................................... 41
10.2
Vessel – Installation Communication .................................................................. 41
10.3
Vessel – Installation Communication Mitigation .................................................. 42
10.4
Marine Safety Awareness for Installation Personnel ........................................... 42
11 DP (Dynamic Positioning) Standard........................................................................... 42
11.1
Introduction......................................................................................................... 42
11.2
All Upstream DP Vessels Including Drilling, Testing and Well InterventionVessels or Units ................................................................................................. 43
12
MODU Standards ......................................................................................................... 43
12.1
Introduction......................................................................................................... 43
12.2
Application .......................................................................................................... 43
13 Survi val Craft Standards ............................................................................................. 43
13.1
Introduction......................................................................................................... 43
13.2
Application .......................................................................................................... 43
13.3
Standard ............................................................................................................. 43
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
5/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed. iii
14
Terminal Support Vessel Standard ............................................................................ 44
14.1
Scope ................................................................................................................. 44
14.2
Minimum Vessel Specifications .......................................................................... 44
14.3
Crew Competency Assurance ............................................................................ 45
14.4
Mooring Master / pilot / Tug Master exchange .................................................... 45
14.5
Continual Improvement – Terminal Support Vessel operations .......................... 45
14.6
Operational Requirements .................................................................................. 45
List of Tables
Table 1: Vessel Bid Requirements ............................................................................................ 3
Table 2: Vessel Personnel Competency Requirements ............................................................ 5
Table 3: Summary of Assessment & Verification Activities (SIVAP) ........................................ 16
Table 4: Project Execution Prioritization Matrix – Strategic and HILP Risks (2014) ................. 18
Table 5: Transportation Engagement & Assessment .............................................................. 19
Table 6: Marine Transportation ‘Pre-sail’ Verification Requirements ....................................... 23
Table 7: Minimum JOVA Assessments (Per Annum/per SBU) ................................................ 30
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
6/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 1
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
1 Standard
1.1 Purpose and Objectives
This procedure identifies the requirements and activities necessary to deliver safe, reliable
and efficient marine services in Chevron Upstream and Gas (U&G) business units. This
procedure will help business units sustain incident-free, reliable and efficient marineoperations.
1.2 Compliance with Standards
All ‘in scope’ upstream marine operations (MSRE OE Process § 1.2) shall comply withChevron Upstream Marine Standard, including adherence to all applicable Classification,
local, Port and Flag State Laws and Regulations.
MSRE OE Process (valid from 14 Nov 2012) Scope
This process applies to all U&G marine vessels including MODUs (Mobile Offshore
Drilling Units including moored and/or DP drillships or semisubmersibles, submersiblesand tender assist drilling units), DP (dynamically positioned) vessels, seismic vessels,
accommodation vessels or barges, lift boats and all other (non bulk petroleum) upstream
offshore vessels chartered by Chevron, as well as those vessels contracted by an affiliate or
contractor, that provide marine support or marine services within Chevron’s area ofoperations. Major and small capital project vessels are included in scope. Area of
operations is defined as any area where in scope assets are deployed in offshore
exploration, development and production operations or during port and/or marineconstruction activities
Any situation where dispute arises (or determination is required) from the operational
application of the Upstream Marine Standard inside an SBU area of operation shall be
directed in the first instance to the SBU Upstream Marine Authority and if necessary
elevated to the U&G MSRE Advisor (U&G Upstream Marine Authority).
2 Chartering of Vessels
2.1 Introduction
This procedure describes the methods by which Upstream and Gas (U&G) will ensure that
contracted (and/or subcontracted) vessels are fit for purpose.
2.2 Internal User Group Requirements
To ensure that vessels deployed in operations are fit for purpose at all times, Supply Chain
Management and Operations teams must possess a thorough common understanding of the
minimum technical requirements applicable to each individual operation, terminal or
facility (refer definition Section § 14.2). It is vital that the correct level of definition foreach towing operation be established and agreed in advance of operations. For each type
of operation, the internal customer shall define in the terminal SOPs the specific minimumrequirements for any vessel services required. The determination exercise must achieve the
correct level of definition and shall address the following areas:
Time period of need
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
7/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 2
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
Commencement date of hire or operations commencement
Type and area of operation
Cargo capacities
Bulk capacities
Operating water depth
Brake Horse Power (BHP) Engine/Propulsion capacity (ahead and astern capability)
Berths, number of crew, passengers and client berths required, as applicable
Other Equipment (Crane, fire fighting, Dynamic Positioning (DP), etc.), as applicable
Crew competency and assurance requirements including definition of any DPcertification and competency requirements.
Additional and specific levels of crew competency for specialist operations (e.g.terminal towing support) or other high risk operations
Terminal support factors – including in-port or terminal area specific pilotage planidentifying passage speeds, high-risk sections, abort measures / locations &emergency response measures
Towing: Vessel Type suited to this work (ASD / Conventional / Tractor / VoithSchneider / DP / Bow Or Stern Winch or both/ etc)
Towing: Define type of ‘Assist Services’ to be provided – (Alongside push/pull //working on a towline // Escort // Transverse Arrest // Hold-Back // Hose - Line
Handling / etc. as appropriate)
Towing: Bollard Pull, and testing regime
Terminal support vessel towing Bollard Pull: Shall be established with dueconsideration to expected efficiency of the tug in an offshore environment
Towing: Clearly define towing vessel equipment requirements, winch capabilities,towing pennants, shackles, gobbing equipment or towing pins and suitability, tow
line tension monitoring / heave compensation requirements and procedures, asapplicable. Specific requirements for ASD, conventional propulsion, bow thrustersand/or minimum DP requirements shall be made for all towing / terminal support
vessels
Chain locker capacity, as applicable
Intact and damage stability assessment for the proposed operations
2.2 Minimum Vessel Bid Requirements
Marine bid requirements shall include the following sections for all vessel charters over 15days. Additionally, the following components for hires less than 15 days are
recommended.
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
8/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 3
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
Table 1: Vessel Bid Requirements
Section Detail
Scope Must be clearly defined to limit vessel operations within the vessel’scapabilities. Areas to consider including are:
Area and Type of Operation
o Water Depth, if required for anchor handling
o Type of, and which specific installations the vessel will support
o Expected duration of contract
o 24 hours/7 days a week operational requirements
o Any special requirements or special cargoes
VesselSpecifications
Vesselspecificationsshall beclearly
defined. Areas toconsiderinclude:
Vessel Type and status of Flag and Main Classification in accordance withany coastal state requirements
It is recommended that maximum age of any vessel considered for service(term, spot chartered or sub-chartered) is 20 years unless accompaniedby a Chevron approved vessel specific integrity assessment which isreviewed at least annually for vessels > 20 years.
Minimum Vessel Deck Dimensions and Capacity
Minimum and Loaded Draft Minimum Propulsion required in brake horse power (BHP)
Bow and Stern thruster requirements, if required
Is DP required? Shall have a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)within last 5 years and valid DP survey.
Fuel Consumption at continuous and maximum outputs
Tank/Bulk Capacities for below deck cargoes – dry and liquid, if required
Cargo transfer pump capabilities, if required
Standard hoses and connections
Ideal transit/ most economical cruising speed
Number of passengers to be carried, if applicable
Is an anchor handing tug (AHT) winch required? Ideal length of tow andwork wire? Line pull winch? Shark jaw or Karm Forks (Ensure no PelicanHooks for anchor handing tug supply vessel (AHTS), Tow pin and Sternroller safe working load (SWL)?
Is Fire Fighting Class-1 Notation (FiFi-1) required?
Standard navigational and life-saving equipment
Bollard Pull, if required
Date of most recent dry docking
Specific equipment or other capabilities
Verification Date of last vessel annual inspection
Date of last company audit
Details of any outstanding action items from inspections or audits
Details of any reportable incidents in past 12 months
Date of upcoming dry dock and inspections
ManningRequirements
Number of crew – any additional crew required?
Experience and qualifications (see U&G – Competency)
Work Schedule
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
9/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 4
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
2.3 Mitigation Process for Vessels Below PreferredSpecification
2.3.1 Customer confi rmation of Vessel Suitability
In the event that a vessel does not meet all the customer’s requirements, the customer must
be notified, and a risk assessment carried out by the offshore installation and verified bythe BU Upstream Marine Authority prior to acceptance.
2.4 Terminal Support Vessel Operations – Attestation of Fitness
Prior to any terminal support operations taking place an assessment shall be conducted to
determine the fitness for duty of BOTH the ‘specific’ vessel proposed AND the ‘specific’
operation being proposed. The assessment shall be conducted by the operational terminal
user group holding operational responsibilities for the marine terminal. A written orelectronic ‘Attestation of Fitness Statement’ shall be created for each vessel in use in each
terminal and / or facility. The Attestation may be made by any means which satisfies these
requirements. The Attestation shall be endorsed by the SBU Upstream Marine Authority.
The Attestation of Fitness Statement (fitness for duty) shall occur in all and each of the
following four (4) circumstances:-
a) At least annually as part of the OVIS risk management process associated with theAnnual OVIQ and SUPO (supplemental) marine inspections. The specific duties to beundertaken and facilities to be deployed at shall be explicitly noted in the attestation.
b) Any newly chartered vessel is to be deployed in any terminal support operation.
c) Any replacement or substitute vessel is to be deployed in any terminal supportoperation.
d) Before any planned change in terminal operational procedures is undertaken - or as
soon as any ‘unplanned operational procedural change’ is recognized as being requiredas a result of Navigation Simulation Exercise output, change in terminal operations /
equipment or export vessel characteristics.
The above requirements apply to any vessel engaged in any support operations (or in any
contingent operations) which shall or may involve any physical towing connection to anexport vessel, production facility or export buoy.
Chevron internal OVIS (Offshore Vessel Information System) shall be used to record all
Attestation of Fitness Statements.
Use of Towing Vessel Approvability Certificates or any classification society schemesshall not obviate the requirements for SBU Attestation of Fitness contained herein.
For existing contracted vessels in service, where an Attestation of Fitness or appropriate
mitigation plan (Upstream Marine Standard § 2.4) is not in place after 1st July 2014, the
operations of the vessel shall be suspended and a replacement vessel with valid Attestation
of Fitness shall be deployed.
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
10/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 5
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
3 Competency
3.1 Introduction
Chevron U&G requires all vessels or units, whether contracted or owned, to be operated by
competent personnel. This procedure describes the methods by which Chevron will assure
the competency of key vessel personnel.
3.2 Key Vessel Personnel
In addition to all certifications/trainings required for all crew by all applicable international
and local regulations, assurance of competency is required for the following key vessel personnel:
Master
Chief Officer
Officer of Watch
Chief Engineer
Certified watch-keeping Engineering Officers
Tow Master
Each SBU shall validate certificates of competency for all key crew members during the periodical inspection process.
Standards and requirements for personnel serving aboard MODUs are governed by Flag,
regional and Port State requirements. Those requirements shall be assured in individualSBUs.
3.3 Minimum Competency RequirementsKey vessel personnel shall meet the following minimum competency and experience
requirements.
Table 2: Vessel Personnel Competency Requirements
Position Competency/Experience
Master Hold an appropriate Flag State certificate (or an endorsement from theFlag State)
Hold a current STCW (Standards of Training for Crew and Watch-keepers) certificate, as required by Flag State requirements
Have demonstrated the ability to communicate in the English language For Dynamic Positioning Class 1,2 or 3, competency requirements
contained in DP Standards within this Process (Chapter 11)
When in command of a vessel engaged in anchor handling operations,have had experience as Master or Chief Officer in same activity within aperiod of 2 years
Served as Master or Chief Officer on a vessel engaged in a similar typeoperation within the last 12 months
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
11/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 6
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
Position Competency/Experience
ChiefOfficer
Hold an appropriate Flag State certificate (or an endorsement from theFlag State)
Hold a current STCW certificate, as required by Flag State requirements
Have demonstrated the ability to communicate in the English language
For Dynamic Positioning Class 1,2 or 3, competency requirements
contained in DP Standards within this Process (Chapter 11) When on a vessel engaged in anchor handling operations, have had
experience in same activity within a period of 2 years
Served as Chief Officer or other officer position on a vessel engaged in asimilar type operation within the last 12 months
Officer ofWatch(OOW)
Hold an appropriate Flag State certificate (or an endorsement from theFlag State)
Hold a current STCW certificate, as required by Flag State requirements
Have demonstrated the ability to communicate in the English language
For Dynamic Positioning Class 1,2 or 3, competency requirementscontained in DP Standards within this Process (Chapter 11)
Served as OOW on a vessel engaged in a similar type operation withinthe last 12 months
ChiefEngineer
Hold an appropriate Flag State certificate (or an endorsement from theFlag State).
Have demonstrated the ability to communicate in the English language
Hold a current STCW certificate, as required by Flag State requirements
For Dynamic Positioning Class 1, 2 or 3, competency requirementscontained in DP Standards within this Process (Chapter 11)
Detailed Knowledge of Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (FMEA)
When carrying out duties on an anchor handling operation have hadexperience as Chief or Second Engineer in same activity within a period of2 years
Served as Chief Engineer or Second Engineer on a vessel engaged in asimilar type operation within the last 12 months
Certifiedwatch-keepingEngineeringOfficer
Hold an appropriate Flag State certificate (or an endorsement from theFlag State).
Have demonstrated the ability to communicate in the English language
Hold a current STCW certificate, as required by Flag State requirements
For Dynamic Positioning Class 1,2 or 3, competency requirementscontained in DP Standards within this Process (Chapter 11)
Served as Engineer on a vessel engaged in a similar type operationwithin the last 12 months
Tow Master Hold a valid Master Class 1 Certificate of Competency
Hold a current STCW certificate, as required by Flag State requirements
Have demonstrated the ability to communicate in the English language
Have had experience as Tow Master in similar type operation within aperiod of a year
Served as Master or Chief Officer in the offshore industry or served as anOffshore Installation Manager (OIM) or Barge Master/Captain/Engineer ona mobile offshore drilling unit (MODU)
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
12/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 7
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
3.4 Assurance of Competency
3.4.1 Marine Crew
Assurance of marine crew competency shall be assured by:
1. Verification through vessel pre-hire methods, i.e. inspection including verification ofdocumentation.
2. Verification through other Annual and Random Inspections required by the UpstreamMarine Standard.
3.4.2 Tow Master
Assurance of competency of the Tow Master shall be demonstrated by one of the following
methods:
1. The party arranging the tow (Chevron or third party):
Review of The STCW certificate, as required by Flag State requirements Documentation of previous Tow Master experience with references, subject to
verification
3. Verification through vessel pre-hire methods, i.e. inspection including verification ofdocumentation.
4. Verification through other Annual and Random Inspections required by the UpstreamMarine Standard.
3.5 Mitigation Act ions If Requirements Are Not Met
3.5.1 Master
For Masters joining a vessel without the competency/experience requirementsdetailed in Table 2, Chevron requires a mentoring plan from the Marine Contractor’s
Crewing Department before the Master will be allowed to take command. Whencomplete, the mentoring plan must be signed off by both Chevron and the Contractor.
When a Chief Officer is put forward for promotion to Master, a written assurance isrequired from the Marine Contractors Crewing Department, made in conjunction
with the Marine Superintendent, that the Chief Officer to be promoted is competent.The assurance should contain a written testimony from a Master under whom the
Chief Officer has served to confirm an ability to manoeuvre the vessel.
NOTE: when a promotion is proposed, it is important to ensure there are no STCWcertification limitations.
Masters shall also participate in a Chevron orientation briefing before takingcommand.
3.5.2 Chief Officer
For Chief Officers joining a vessel with no experience in the Offshore Industry andcannot meet the experience criteria detailed in Table 2, Chevron requires a mentoring plan from the Marine Contractor’s Crewing Department before the Chief Officer will
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
13/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 8
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
be allowed to assume the position. When complete the plan must be signed off and anassurance given by the Marine Contractor that all requirements have been met.
If the Chief Officer is new to the type of operations then he shall also participate in aChevron orientation briefing before engaging in that activity.
3.5.3 Officer of Watch (OOW)
For OOW joining a vessel with no experience in the Offshore Industry and cannotmeet the experience criteria detailed in Table 2, Chevron requires a mentoring plan
from the Marine Contractor’s Crewing Department before the OOW will be allowed
to assume the responsibilities. When complete the plan must be signed off and an
assurance given by the Marine Contractor that all requirements have been met.
If the OOW is new to the type of operations then he shall also participate in aChevron orientation briefing before engaging in that activity.
3.5.4 Chief Engineer
For Chief Engineer joining a vessel with no experience in the Offshore Industry and
cannot meet the experience criteria detailed in Table 2, Chevron requires a mentoring plan from the Marine Contractor’s Crewing Department before the Chief Engineerwill be allowed to assume the position.
3.5.5 Tow Master
It is recommended that Tow Master meet all minimum requirements. Mitigation is atthe discretion of the Upstream Marine Authority, SBU Vice President or GeneralManager and marine contractor(s)
3.5.6 Crew
Crew coming to join a vessel with no experience in the Offshore Industry must besingled out by the Marine Contractor’s Crewing Department and the Master advisedaccordingly. In keeping with STCW requirements a mentor must be appointed by the
Master.
Supernumeries and all passengers shall have Chevron approval to sail at least 24hours prior to sailing. No persons of age 16 or under shall proceed to sea on anyChevron chartered vessel. Assurance of these requirements shall be made during
vessel inspections.
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
14/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 9
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
4 Vessel Assurance
4.1 Introduction
In order to ensure vessels are fit for duty and safety standards are maintained, Chevron or
third-party inspections shall be required for all vessels or barges at least annually. This
procedure outlines inspection and verification requirements. Standard Safety ManagementSystem (SMS) audits are addressed through the Contractor HES Management (CHESM) process.
4.2 Vessel Inspections
4.2.1 General
The contract owner/sponsor or designee shall verify that an annual inspection has been
performed using the Offshore Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (OVIQ) conducted by anindependent Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF) accredited Inspector.
Inland waterway dedicated tonnage or registered fishing vessels engaged in guard duty
operations may be inspected using local SBU Questionnaires that shall meet therequirements contained in this Standard. All OVIQ’s will be available through the OCIMF
Offshore Vessel Inspection Database (OVID). A valid and ‘in-date’ OVIQ shall be a ‘pre-
hire’ requirement. The requirement for all applicable vessels/units to hold an ‘in-date’OVIQ includes the follow requirements:-
a.) Vessel operator to be registered in OVID.
b.) Vessel particulars are complete and up to date operator contact details are provided.
c.) An OVPQ (Offshore Vessel Particulars Questionnaire) is uploaded into OVID.
d.) Vessel operator response to observations from latest OVIQ uploaded into OVID.
Exception: SA/PZ only, may use non-OCIMF accredited in-house inspectors providing
appropriate protocols are used.
4.2.2 Vessel of Opportunity Protocol
This section establishes controls for situations where vessel Operators request Chevron’s
assistance in commissioning OVIQ inspections as part of the requirements to meet theChevron Upstream Marine Standard (§4.2.1). There are operational benefits to Chevron
and contractors in having vessels pre-populated with inspections in OVID. At the very
least, knowledge and assessment of earlier OVIQ inspections can be used to assess vesselsfor future business. Chevron support vessels being registered and inspected within the
OVID system even in advance of vessel hire. This protocol details the procedures to follow
when owners/operators request OVIQ inspections outside of CVX SBUs or on speculative
projects where we do not have organisational capability. Local SBU strategies forcommissioning OVID inspections are not affected. (e.g. local SBU Marine Notice). This
protocol may be used to complement or supplement existing SBU OVID execution
strategies.
In order to facilitate owners/operators requests to participate in the OVID System, Chevronmay assist and ‘commission’ OVIQ reports in advance of vessels being chartered. To
achieve this, owner/operators of offshore vessels may send a formal request to Chevron
Upstream and Gas using the enclosed procedure. Owners/operators are permitted toestablish contact and make arrangements with an OVID accredited inspector and submit an
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
15/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 10
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
‘Inspection Proposal’ to Chevron for consideration. The proposal information must be sentto the Global Upstream Capability team in Houston or an SBU Upstream Marine Authority
for consideration. The receiving Upstream Marine Authority is required to check the
inspector’s experience and record and to monitor the owner/operator/inspector combinationto ensure any potential conflict of interest is eliminated.
ProcedureOperator (Document of Compliance holder) submits the following completed ‘Inspection
Proposal Information’ form and sends to assigned SBU Marine Authority (SBU vessels)
OR the Chevron Upstream (Upstream Capability) for any non-SBU assigned vessels.
Chevron will consider the proposal, including an assessment of the inspector and ifapproved, setup the Inspection in the OVID system based on the information provided by
the owner/operator in the form below.
The inspection file is transmitted to the nominated Inspector via email through OVID.OVIQ is completed, uploaded and Chevron nominator is automatically informed.
Vessel owner/operator OVID rep. shall respond to observations (within OVID system)once report is validated by Chevron internally. As per the normal OVID process
Following inspection, upload and validation, inspection report will be available to Chevron
SBU Marine Authorities worldwide. Information is assessed in the internal OVIS risk
management system.
Vessel of Opportunity OVIQ Proposal Form
No VoOp Inspection Proposal Information Proposal Details
1 Vessel Name
2 Vessel IMO or Registered No.3 Year Vessel Built
4 Proposed date & time of inspection
5 Proposed port of inspection.
6 Work scope & spec of vessel (for Chevron to select theinspection Operations elements or variant(s) to use).
7 Name of accredited OVIQ Inspector nominated.
8 Name of OVID registered vessel Operator/Owner.
9 Vessel Operator MUST confirm that the vessel is properlyregistered in OVID including vessel specifications,nominated operator contact details and all are current.
10 Vessel owner/operator MUST confirm that complete, fullyaccurate and warranted OVPQ data has been uploaded intothe OVID database.
11 Registered Operator (in OVID) must upload OVMSA andconfirm that report is released to Chevron in the DistributionPolicy (Y/N) in OVID. OVMSA shall be uploaded andreleased before OVIQ commission is made. It isrecommended that OVMSA is updated at least Annually.
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
16/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 11
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
Chevron Conditions of Nomination
Chevron REQUIRE that all vessel detail fields and OVPQ data is input before any
nomination may be made. Chevron Upstream Marine team (or SBU Upstream MarineAuthority) will communicate with the vessel owner/operator in response to the inspection
proposal where these requirements are not met.
OVMSA must be uploaded and released to Chevron in OVID Distribution Policy. TheOperator (DOC holder) as registered in OVID must be the one that completes the OVMSA.
If the Operator has registered a given vessel under an affiliate name (Ship Operator XXX
Ltd) then that entity requires an OVMSA in the system
Chevron do not wish to be copied on logistics or other communications relating to settingup the agreed date between Inspector and Owner/Operator.
Owner/operators are required to handle all contract arrangements with the OVID accredited
inspector on their account. Owner/operator contracts inspector.
Chevron expect the Inspection to take place on the date/time nominated in the submitted
Form and in all cases within 7 days of the proposed date.
Chevron carefully study the quality of the OVIQs submitted by inspectors and Chevronreserve the ability to reject any nominated inspector at any time.
Chevron will report any misconduct in the use of OVID/OVIQ direct to OCIMF, London in
order to maintain and preserve the integrity of the system and the reports within.
4.3 MODU Marine Inspections
Operators of MODUs are strongly encouraged to make use of the OVID system (OCIMF,
London). The technical requirements contained in this Standard remain in scope and may
be assured using existing and/or amended marine risk processes such as the drilling unitverification standard.
This section applies to all U&G marine MODUs (Mobile Offshore Drilling Units)
including moored and/or DP drillships or semisubmersibles, jackups, submersibles andtender assist drilling units. This section contains specific requirements for MODUs to hold
a pre-hire and/or annual OVID (OVIQ) or OVID based Inspection (Chevron Form name:
MODU.IQ) from 01 Jan 2014. This section clarifies the execution process that shall be
carried out in order to meet the inspection requirements laid down.
This section forms operating requirements to all MODUs included in ‘scope’. This section
establishes inspection requirements in areas such as marine regulatory compliance, DP
(dynamic positioning), rig moving, anchor handling, hose handling, personnel transfer and
communications. Additional drilling or subsea technical requirements not relating to theUpstream Marine Standard are outside of the scope of this section and shall be assured
using other internal Drilling & Completions (D&C) SBU local or Corporate technical
verification Standards. SBUs may conduct additional suitability or assurance requirementsin accordance with local SOPs.
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
17/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 12
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
The MODU.IQ questions are primarily designed to highlight operational practices and behaviour patterns, effectiveness of controls on board by sampling the effectiveness of the
safety management system at that point in time. The OVIQ is an objective document
reflecting the unit during the inspection; it does not include subjective comments oropinion and does not state acceptability. Findings shall be assessed and managed in SBUs
by the Upstream Marine Authorities in partnership with the SBU drilling management
team.
4.3.1 Pre-hire or Annual MODU Marine Onspect ion requirements
The following requirements for any Marine MODU inspection are made:
A comprehensive MODU marine pre-hire or annual inspection plan shall begenerated by the SBU Upstream Marine Authority (or delegate) prior to the
inspection taking place.
The marine inspection may be conducted by either Chevron in-house specialistmarine inspectors or contracted marine MODU inspectors or a mix of those
resources.
Any MODU Marine Inspector assigned to an inspection shall meet the minimumlevel of qualification, experience and competence. This shall be confirmed by theSBU Marine Authority as part of the pre-inspection plan §1.0(a).
The SBU Marine Authority (or delegate) shall coordinate the inspection.
The MODU.IQ (.XLS) inspection form is approved by U&G (UpstreamCapability) SCM and D&C leadership.
It is recommended that a minimum the inspection shall take place with a 1-2 person team aboard over a 2-3 days and this will vary depending upon MODU type
and complexity. SBUs should consider bunk space limitations and perhaps utilize
CVX HES representatives aboard the units as inspection assistance.
A DP (dynamic positioning) verification exercise (using MTS Standard) shall beincluded in the pre-inspection plan and shall be conducted annually on all DP
drilling vessels or units and part of the inspection.
Marine personnel manning and competency assessment shall take intoconsideration flag and coastal State requirements in place at the time of the
inspection.
SBU Upstream Marine Authorities shall be responsible for making logisticsarrangements in SBUs in consultation and co-operation with the SBU drilling
management team.
Results of the MODU.IQ inspection shall be recorded in the Chevron internalOVIS (Offshore Vessel Information System) database.
4.3.2 Conduct of Annual MODU Marine Inspect ion requirements
SBU Marine Authorities (or delegates) shall be responsible for planning andexecution of the Annual marine Inspections using the requirements and
expectations defined in the section:-
The SBU Marine Authority or delegate shall ensure the interface aboard throughthe Chevron Drill site leadership representatives.
The inspection team shall follow OCIMF inspection practices.
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
18/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 13
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
A briefing to the Chevron reps shall take place to explain the inspection process.
A briefing to the Contractors Reps and/or OIM and Master shall take placeexplaining that this is not an examination.
All team members who attend to be fully equipped with PPE as per CUG and localSBU requirements.
Use the MODU.IQ template and mark up any deficiencies.
If areas that cannot be looked at for whatever reason, simply take note on theinspection form.
All MODU.IQ reports are to be uploaded to the OVIS database. If a given vesselor unit is not registered in OVID, then the OVIS database shall be used to house
and rate the MODU.IQ data.
Outcome of all this will be a global U&G marine Inspection format and procedurewhich we will issue as joint U&G / D&C Marine Note.
Specific requirements of the Marine Standard as they relate to MODUs shall beaddressed as part of the Chevron MODU.IQ exercise. The following requirementsshall be assessed during the inspection process. (personnel transfer, hose
management, DP Standard (WSOG/CAMO limits in place, review of annual trials,FMEA, review of DP incident reports in previous 5 years etc.), SIMOPS processes
including acoustic plan (DP vessels/units), communications methodology and
cargo transfers.
A clear communication strategy for conclusions and reporting to the shore basedBU D&C management shall be developed by the SBU Marine Authority (ordelegate).
The inspection team shall promote the use of Stop Work Authority (SWA) andInjury and Incident Free Operations (IFO) aboard the inspected vessel or unit.
4.4 Upstream Marine Risk Management Process
4.4.1 OVMSA Requirement – All contractors
Inspection Observations/Deficiencies identified will be assessed within the marine risk
management process utilizing the Chevron internal Offshore Vessel Information System
(OVIS).
From Jan 1, 2014 Operators of all ‘OVID Applicable’ vessels or units as defined in § 4.2(Upstream Marine Standard) are required to complete the online OVMSA (Offshore Vessel
Management and Self Assessment) (OCIMF, Oil Companies International Marine Forum)
in order to align with Chevron Upstream OE expectations and to purposefully drive quality
improvement within their management systems.
4.4.2 Chevron Upstream Key Marine Expectations for all applicableContractors
As part the requirement for Operators to make use of OVMSA, it is important for CU to
provide direction on expectations in seven (7) keys areas. The Seven Keys below arethematic and not inclusive but provide a flavour for the types of commitments Chevron are
seeking in the highest performing and most OE aligned marine Contractors. Overall
Chevron Upstream direction, aims and Expectations are summurized:-
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
19/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 14
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
Chevron Upstream Key Marine Expectations
1. Vessel Operator commits to operating fully in line with the Chevron GlobalUpstream Marine Standard (CU) and strongly supports continuous improvement and
the development of an effective OE culture both in their management and aboard
their vessels. This includes commitment to Stop Work Authority (SWA)2. Vessel Operator commits to fully utilising OVID (OCIMF, London) and ensuring alloperated vessels will be inspected at least annually using the OVID system.
3. Vessel Operator commits to making use of OVMSA (Offshore Vessel Management& Self Assessment) (OCIMF, London) and using the tool to identify and drive
continual improvement and OE culture in their organisation.4. Vessel Operator intends to supply vessels with standards of equipment and
accommodation which will deliver safe and reliable operations. Intent should be to
provide a work environment for crews which shall drive to motivate and build steadyand experienced crews on vessels. We consider this to be a major factor in the drive
for incident free operations. Vessel Operators should maintain a robust competence
assurance program as well as develop crew retention strategies. OVMSA Stagetargets shall be defined to address these expectations.
5. Vessel Operator commit to operating any DP (dynamically positioned) vessels in fullcompliance with the Chevron DP Standard.
6. Vessel Operator commits to providing effective shore based management &technical support tasked with driving incident free operations. Management will
assist CU logistics teams in gaining the maximum possible efficiency from vessels in
service while never compromising the safety of operations..
7. Vessel Operator commits to maximizing use of locally based national crews and
shows willingness to participate in local content initiatives within Chevron Upstream
business units. Operator supports local training drives and participates as an active
member in local maritime communities.
Rationale guidance: The Chevron Upstream Seven Key Marine Expectations are designed toaccomplish 5 key aims:-
Connect Chevron Upstream OE vision (as a major offshore charterer) directly withShip Managers / vessel Operators.
Connect Chevron Upstream OE vision directly with marine crews.
Communicate and display willingness to accept accountability for driving OE culture& OE performance in marine operations in our areas of activity.
Open channels for sincere and like-minded Ship-owners / Opreators to partner withChevron to deliver against the Expectations. Identify ‘willing’ Contractors and helpmove from a ‘combative’ to a ‘collaborative’ and more ‘vested’ relationship with as
many suppliers as possible.
Allow vessel Operators to develop and explain their operating and improvement‘cases’ across seven key risk and reliability areas using a common global approach.
4.5 Verification Through Random Inspections
A random inspection plan and inspection checklist shall be developed for each BusinessUnit by the contract owner/sponsor or designee. The inspections shall be carried out
according to plan by either a Chevron representative or third party.
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
20/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 15
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
4.6 Bulk petroleum - Requirements and jurisdiction.
Chevron Shipping Company LLC. (CSC) holds specific roles and responsibilities for
marine assurance of bulk petroleum (product, crude, gas (LPG or LNG), lubricant,
chemical or any other liquid hydrocarbon) transportation involving tankers, gas carriers or
barges. Responsibility for provision of marine assurance for bulk petroleum transportation
is formally established and clarified herein. With specific reference to any Chevronterminal, installation or facility, the following shall apply:
Any vessel or barge carrying bulk petroleum or chemicals owned by any CVX entity; orwhich will be delivered to or loaded from any CVX entity; or which is chartered by any
CVX entity: or which will be berthing at any CVX, owned, operated or leased facility or
terminal/installation shall first be nominated to, and approved by, Chevron ShippingMarine Assurance Group before it is contracted. Every contract or charter party allowed
under CSC DOA must include an appropriate vetting clause so that if any vetting approval
is rescinded, any vessel may be re-delivered or operations suspended without undue penalty. CSC Marine Assurance has worldwide coverage with offices in London,
Singapore, San Ramon and Houston. Any office can provide assurance reviews but are
conveniently located across time zones to meet SBU needs.
Suggested CSC Marine Assurance Offices
London Singapore Houston/San Ramon
SBUNMA, SASBU, SA/PZ,
CUE, FGP ASBU, IBU, ABU
CBU, LABU, GOM,FEABU
CSC Marine Assurance Direct Contact: CSC Chartering and Clearance, central email:
This section clarifies jurisdiction in cases when any new or existing (non vetted) bulk
petroleum transportation options are considered inside an SBU, either by base business or
projects. This section clarifies Marine Assurance requirements across any operation or project within Chevron Upstream.
4.7 Subsea Installation Vessel Equipment AssuranceRequirements (SIVAP)
In addition to the requirements for marine risk management contained in this Section, any
vessel or barge nominated to undertake installation of rigid, flexible or umbilical productsshall be technically assured through the steps contained herein.
4.7.1 Step 1: During FEED/Pre-qualif ication/Bid stage, prior to contractaward – SME Assessment
Due diligence for the pipelay installation equipment and installation method proposed shall
be achieved via a technical assessment prior to contract award. This requirement is made
in order to establish adequacy and fit for purpose of the vessel pipelay equipment for the
intended application. Each SBU or Project shall assess the nature of the operations and
proposed construction technique during FEED and/or appropriate pre-award phases. TheSBU and/or Project should establish contact using the central email address below as early
as possible in order that SME advice, contractor or vessel feedback can be applied early by
the SME group. Step 1 is advisory in nature and used to introduce lessons learned from previous projects and audits. The definition of assurance requirements shall be determined
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
21/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 16
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
through existing Chevron Engineering Standards following consultation between the SMEgroup and the project team.
4.7.2 Step 2: During project execution / post contract award – Formalassurance requirements
Technical assurance of the service and proposed installation vessel(s) shall take place forall operations. The pipelay equipment assurance shall compliment the mandatory OVID
and Supplemental SBU inspections performed under the Upstream Marine Standard or
other OE Processes. A joint approach involving appropriate SMEs representing subsea andmarine is encouraged. The definition of assurance requirements shall be determined
through existing Chevron Engineering Standards following consultation between the SMEgroup and the project team. Marine requirements are contained in the Upstream Marine
Standard.
Table 3: Summary of Assessment & Verification Activities (SIVAP)
Activi ty Requirement
A c t i v i t y / O p e
r a t i n g P h a s e
Prior to award Prior to the Contract Award, ETC FE shall be consulted by SBUContract Owner on the assessment of the proposed constructionvessel(s) to ensure adequacy to perform the intended work scopeincluding contingency and scope uncertainties. Potentialknowledge gaps should be identified and submitted to the projectteam for consideration during contract negotiations. This phase isan engineering assessment to ensure that the proposed vessel iscapable of the intended scope. The engineering assessmentreport will be reviewed and approved by the project team. Awareness of applicable Chevron Standards and verification ofexpectations is the key priority during this period. Contact:[email protected]
Post awardand prior tooperations
Post award, if necessary and required by the Project team/ SBUContract Owner, ETC FE may be involved in assuring thevessel(s) pipelay system conditions (maintenance, crewcompetency, level of spare parts, etc.) and readiness to performthe intended installation work scope. Any agreed testing andverification should be developed and witnessed by SMEs inconjunction with the project team, contractor and overall marineassurance team. Alignment with Chevron applicable Standards isthe key priority at this stage. Contact: [email protected]
Existingvessels inserviceengaged inscopeactivities
Existing rigid, flexible or umbilical vessel based installationactivities shall be considered on a case-by-case basis by Contractowners. It is strongly recommended that SBU contract ownerscommunicate with ETC FE using the central email contact:[email protected] in order to define the appropriate levelof assurance for their ongoing operations.
SBU Contract Owners and project teams are encouraged to contact ETC FE (via central
global email) in order to discuss the utilization of local OC and SMEs as much as possible
or where practicable. The local technical organizational capability development of SMEswill ensure consistent application of this assurance process and deliver adherence to
Chevron Standards. Engagement with ETC FE throughout the process, including the
delivery of results and capture of data and intelligence will add value to the central
repository. This data can in turn be shared across SBUs and Projects in a timely and
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
22/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 17
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
consistent manner. The assigned SBU Upstream Marine Authority and SBU and/or Projectsubsea teams shall co-operate with the communication and execution of these requirements
and join to drive simplification and integration.
ETC FE (Subsea Pipeline Construction and Installation Technical team) Global groupdirect contact: ETC group mailbox should be contacted directly.
This section serves to clarify the requirements whenever installation services are required
inside an SBU area of operation, either in Small (SCP) or Major Capital Projects (MCP) or
base business lead projects.
4.8 Strategic & High Impact/Low Probabil ity (HILP)Transportation Verification Standard
4.8.1 Scope & Application
This section applies to any vessel or barge nominated to undertake any wet or dry
transportation of any cargo, structure or load/s and identified by the project or SBU (using
the Project Risk Execution Matrix) and assessed as “Strategic” or “HILP” (High Impact,Low Probability) Risks which are intended to deliver structures or cargo from outside of
the SBU area of operation to a location inside an SBU area of operation. In addition, allsuch transportation activities taking place wholly within the SBU area of operation shall
conform to this Standard.
In addition to the risk management requirements contained in this Standard, any applicable
transportation activity shall require detailed independent technical verification as detailedin this section. Strategic and HILP risks are those activities defined in the Prioritization
Matrix (Table 1).
This Verification and Assurance Standard contained in this section (§ 4.8) enter into force
from 1st Jan 2015. For existing major capital projects, with transportation vessel selection
signed before 1st Jan 2015, implementation of Step 2 of this Standard is strongly advised
however shall be at the discretion of the individual project leadership team. Existing
approved Upstream Marine Standard as amended applies to all in-scope assets within an
SBU Area of Operation.
NOJV Activities are not in scope of the MSRE Process or this Standard however, any
advice or advisory services provided to NOJV for projects in SBU shall be made on the
basis of this Standard.
This Standard details formal requirements whenever strategic or HILP risk transportation
services are planned, either in Small (SCP) or Major Capital Projects (MCP) or in base business operations. Aged contracts shall be handled on a case by case basis. For existing
projects post contracting implementation will be at the discretion of project leadershipteam.
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
23/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 18
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
Project Execution Prior itization Matrix – Strategic and HILP Risks (2014)
Table 4: Project Execut ion Prio ritization Matrix – Strategic and HILP Risks (2014)
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
24/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 19
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
4.8.2 Step 1 – Early Engagement
Step 1: During FEED/ Pre-Qualification/ Bid Stage, prior to contract award
Due diligence for the transportation plan and transportation method proposed shall be
achieved via a technical assessment prior to contract award. Early engagement with JVT
SMEs should take place in order to establish fit for purpose and combined adequacy of thevessel and cargo for the intended transportation. As required by Project Planning
requirements, each SBU or Project shall assess the nature of the planned operation and
proposed transportation methodology during FEED and/or appropriate pre-award phases.The SBU and/or Project should establish contact using the central email address (below) as
early as possible in order that SME assurance advice and lessons learned can be considered
early by the SME group. Step 1 is used to introduce lessons learned from previous projectsand create common understanding of applicable verification Standards. Requirements are
determined in applicable Chevron Engineering Standards (CES) as well as MSRE, MSW &
SBU OE Process requirements. The Standard of verification and assurance should be
established in each case as part of the consultation between the Joint verification team andthe Project in this step. The JVT should be involved in the development of a project
specific support plan to address the Step 1 activities and Step 2 assurance verification
requirements.
Acti vit y Recommendation
Prior to contractaward scope detail Prior to the Contract Award, it is a recommendation that the Transportation
Joint Verification Team JVT ([email protected]) should be consulted bythe SBU or project contract owner. A Transportation Assessment of theproposed transportation plan/vessel(s) to ensure adequacy to perform theintended work scope should take place and be shared to build commonunderstanding across the project and provide improved decision quality andtechnical validation. The Assessment should be made by the SBU/ Projectand potential knowledge gaps should be identified and submitted to the project
team for consideration during planning or contract negotiations. This phase is atechnical assessment which should form part of normal Project assurancepractice. The Transportation Assessment should be reviewed by the jointverification team. Awareness of applicable Chevron Standards and verificationof expectations is the key priority during this phase. Details of the specificverification requirements introduced in Step 2 shall be considered during theengagement activities in the Step 1 phase of planning.
This Step recommends that an appropriate level of subject matter expertiseand experience deployed in early planning in order to provide guidance andendorse critical project decisions relating to transportation activities. Theproject planning, direction and execution responsibility remains with theproject. Step 1 is designed to provide focus into effective use of the Project
Assurance Guide.
Central Contact [email protected]
Table 5: Transportation Engagement & Assessment
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
25/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 20
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
4.8.3 Step 2 – Formal Verification ‘pre-sail’ Requirements
Step 2: During project execution / post contract award – Joint Verification requirements
Technical assurance of the service and proposed transportation vessel(s) or barge(s) shalltake place for all operations deemed critical by the project, through the activities defined in
Table 3. The assurance activities shall compliment the mandatory OVID (Offshore Vessel
Inspection Database) (OCIMF, London), Supplemental SBU and technical inspections performed under this Upstream Marine Standard. A joint approach involving appropriate
SMEs representing CSME (ETC), MOCS (CSC) and UC Marine is required. Overall
vessel marine requirements for entry into an SBU area of operation are contained in local
SBU requirements. Verification requirements made in this section are complementary toexisting Upstream and / SBU local marine requirements. An operation specific assurance
table shall be defined in each case and used as an activity tracker during the verification
phase. Table 5 contains assurance requirements and defines the standards of verification.
Acti vit y Marine Requirements & Standards of Ver if ication
Post awardand detailengineering
Phase
Post award, the Joint Verification Team (JVT) is required to be contacted in order for anindependent verification activities are conducted to ensure transport engineeringconsideration are properly included and conducted in the detail engineering phase. An assessment of the design approach to ensure alignment with Chevron Standards.Design parameter (Metocean criteria etc.) and analysis methodology shall be identifiedand agreed and form the basis of the design. Engineering parameter and boundaries limitsshall also be properly documented and shall serve as input to operational limits for thetransportation. An agreed follow on design verification plan will be establish and put in place for continualdetail engineer support and review by CSME (ETC) to verify Elements below ahead ofplanned operation.
Post awardand prior tooperations
Post award, the Joint Verification Team (JVT) is required to be contacted in order thatindependent verification activities are undertaken prior to any loading or transportationoperations taking place. The verification activities and applicable standards are included inthis table. Alignment with existing approved Chevron Standards and robust verification ofrisks and safeguards is the priority at this stage. Positive verification from theTransportation Joint Verification Team (JVT) is required for each element in Table 3.
This table includes broad verification Standards for all transportation modes including bothwet and dry transport. Verification activities shall be conducted in parallel with assignedMWS (Marine Warranty Surveyors) who shall operate under formalized terms andconditions. Details of recommendations made by approved Marine Warranty Surveyorsshall be considered during the Verification process by the JVT.
Element ID& ActionParty
JVT Verification Requirements Verification Standard to meet requirements
1.CSME(ETC) CSME (ETC) sign off on Detail
Transport EngineeringConfirmation from CSME (ETC) that all transportengineering and analysis are conducted inaccordance with the approved design basis.
CSME (ETC) verification to ensure structural(vessel, cargo, sea-fastening, vessel motion,loading and cribbing design) and Naval Architectural design meeting the establishedtransport condition and agreed limitations
2.MOCS(CSC) Vessel FMEA/FMECA review
(applicable to all transportationvessels carrying strategic or HILP
Single worst case failure modes in a) propulsion, b)power generation and c) heading control to bedefined in a suitable analysis and shared with SME
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
26/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 21
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
cargoes as determined by theproject)
group. Standard of verification shall be confirmationthat vessel is fit for purpose. Ref. Standard FMEAManagement Guide IMCA M178 & M 166 –Guidance on Failure Modes and effects analysis(FMEAs). A basic FME(C)A will be appropriate toidentify redundancy in a), b) & c) above.
3.MOCS(CSC) FMEA/FMECA of ballast control
(may form part of Item 2 forvessels). Requirement made for allvessels and barges carryingstrategic or HILP cargoes asdetermined by the project.
Single worst case failure modes in a) mechanical,b) piping and c) ballast control systems to bedefined in a suitable analysis and shared with SMEgroup. Standard of verification shall be confirmationthat vessel is fit for purpose. Ref. Standard FMEAManagement Guide IMCA M178 & M 166 –Guidance on Failure Modes and effects analysis(FMEAs). A basic FME(C)A will be appropriate toidentify redundancy in a), b) & c) above.
4.SBU UMA OVID (Offshore Vessel Inspection
Database) Pre-hire / AnnualInspection & OVIS Review and riskassessment concluded
Requirements as per Upstream Marine Standard
and SBU or technical inspection requirements to beconcluded following Upstream Marine RiskManagement Protocol. OVIS review required forany vessel, tug and/or barge.
5.UC Marine Crew competency requirements Completion of online assessment by registered
Operator (OVID, OCIMF) & Ref: FFS-PU-5116-B
6.SBU UMA OVMSA Operator Assessment
published and released to Chevrononline in OVID database
Completion of online assessment by registeredOperator (OVID, OCIMF)
7.UC Marine Joint Verification & Assessment
(JOVA) Exercise of vessel Operatorfor vessels carrying strategic orHILP risk cargoes as determined bythe project.
Exercise to be held at offices of registered Operator(OVID). Joint exercise designed to assist theOperator. On site JOVA Exercise shall be in placeand/or conducted as early as possible followingvessel selection. Applies to Operators of anyproposed tug or vessel. Ref. Upstream MarineStandard JOVA Protocol. A separate JOVA Assessment may not be required if one is already inplace for the Operator from earlier work withChevron.
8.
MOCS(CSC) Underkeel clearance & squat reviewfor all voyage stages include port,coastal and open water transitstages
Operators Policy review meets minimum standardsof detail for entire voyage including contingencyroutes. (Ref. ICS Bridge Procedures Guide 2007)
9.MTJVT Transit weather and motion
operational limits setting exercisecompleted
Chevron Recommended Practice: Chevronrecommends adoption of Operational Guidance onOperational Activity Planning Ref: IMCA M220 Nov
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
27/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 22
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
2012.
10.MOCS(CSC) Load Plan CES Ref: FFS-PU-5116-B & U&G MSW a)
Appendix L Lifting and Rigging Standard and b) Appendix B PPHA (Planning Phase Hazard Analysis)
11.MOCS(CSC) Discharge Plan CES Ref: FFS-PU-5116-B & U&G MSW a)
Appendix L Lifting and Rigging Standard and b) Appendix B PPHA (Planning Phase Hazard Analysis)
12.UC Marine Routing / Routing Management Plan
& Global geographic vessel trackingPlan
Plan to include definition of Place of shelter foreach transportation leg, medevac plan. Plan toinclude means of global vessel tracking. Processshall meet requirements of Chevron CES (FFS-PU-5116-B). Vessel position and weather condition
updates shall be undertaken at intervals of at least24 Hours. Access to vessel tracking data shall beprovided to Chevron after formal agreement withvessel Operator. This information may becontained within the main transportation manual.
13.UC Marine Event and daily reporting &
communications PlanProcedure in place and positively verified.
Process shall meet requirements of Chevron CES(FFS-PU-5116-B). All reports including failuresshall be reported to Chevron JVT team. Reportinginformation may be contained within the maintransportation manual.
14.SBU UMA Security plan review including
positive verification from all Portstate agencies threat levels areknown and incorporated in plan
Procedure in place and positively verified. BMP4(Best Management Practice) & IMO Anti-PiracyGuidelines is provided in IMO Guidance to ShipOwners and Ship operators on prevention of acts ofpiracy to be Standard basis for any transit. Theinbound SBU Upstream Marine Authority shall co-ordinate a review of the Operators Voyage SecurityPlan with CSC Security which shall be approved bythe inbound SBU Security lead Advisor.
15.
SBU UMA Arrival port Logistics Plan Procedure in place and reviewed by inbound SBUUpstream Marine Authority (arrival SBU area ofoperation). This information may be containedwithin the main transportation manual.
16.MTJVT Marine Transportation related
recommendations made byassigned MWS (Marine Warranty
Any MWS recommendations are reviewed and, ifrequired, closed out prior to load out. Standard:CES Ref: FFS-PU-5116-B
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
28/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 23
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
Surveyors)
17.Other verification activities deemednecessary to ensure compliancewith all Port or Flag State andapplicable Chevron Global or SBU
OE or technical Standards. Asdefined in the overall project /transport support plan.
Details or written confirmation from the JVT Teamthat no additional verification is required.
VerificationDeliverable
Positive and formal confirmation against the full range of required verification activitiestabled above (1-17) shall be endorsed by a management representative of the JointUpstream Team prior to commencement of the proposed transportation operations.
Contact [email protected]
Table 6: Marine Transportation ‘Pre-sail’ Verification Requirements
Project teams are required to contact the central Joint Verification Team using the central
global email address included in Table 6. Engagement with the team throughout the process, including the delivery of results and capture of data and intelligence will add valueto the central repository. This data can in turn be shared across SBUs and Projects in a
timely and consistent manner during subsequent Step 1 phases through the process and
Upstream Marine Risk Network. The assigned SBU Marine Operations team, localUpstream Marine Authority and SBU and/or Project transportation teams shall actively co-
operate with the communication and execution of these requirements. Central aim is to
join subject matter experts to drive simplification and integration between base business &
projects It is vital that prevailing local maritime customs, regulatory or operationalconditions relating to the project be assessed in close cooperation with the SBU Upstream
Marine Authority & local logistics / BB Ops teams during the planning of any inbound
transport. If in doubt in any phase in relation to the application of this standard, projects
should email the Central Joint mailbox [email protected] for specialist advice.
4.8.4 Supporting Standards
Chevron Engineering Standards mandated by this Standard
FFS-PU-5116-B Transportation of Cargo by Barge or Ship
FFS-DU-5173 Global Performance and Stability Design for Floating Offshore
Platforms
FFS-PU-5247 Model Test Specifications for Floating Systems
FFS-EN-200 Metocean Conditions for Ocean Transports and Installations
Industry guidance documents: Adopted as appropriate on the basis of equivalency toVerification Standard listed above, for each verification Element defined.
5 Safety Culture Development
5.1 Introduction
Chevron believes all incidents are preventable and that incident-free operation (IFO) is
achievable. We embrace the two key principles which we believe are fundamental in
achieving our goal of IFO:
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
29/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 24
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
Do it safely or not at all
There is always time to do it right
An organization with a “safety culture” is one that gives appropriate priority to safety and
realizes that safety has to be managed like other areas of the business.
5.2 Pre-contracting Safety Discussions
Prior to hiring any vessel from a company that has not done business with the SBU for a
period greater than six (6) months, the contract owner or delegate shall meet with the
company’s management. This meeting is to both emphasize that safety is a core value anddevelop an understanding of the contractor’s management commitment to safety. Some
areas for the contract owner to consider are:
Senior leadership’s safety beliefs
Vision for reaching IFO
Effective engagement-deployment throughout the company
Company’s passion for safety Ensure senior leaders understand their role in creating and sustaining a Total Safety
Culture
Measurement and continuous improvement strategy
Audit of vessel operator’s safety management system
If the contract owner is not satisfied that the contractor’s management is committed to
safety, then the contract owner can choose not to use the contractor at this time or to jointly
develop a mitigation plan.
5.3 Safety Orientation
In addition to CHESM pre-job orientation requirements, the crew of all vessels, at the
commencement of contract, shall receive a Chevron safety orientation. Any new crew
members during the duration of the term shall also receive a Chevron safety orientation.The safety orientation shall review, at a minimum, Chevron’s incident reporting
requirements, Stop Work Authority, Tenets of Operation, and IFO culture. It is the contract
owner’s responsibility to ensure that crew members receive their initial orientation along
with periodic reinforcement of the safety principles.
5.4 Operation Meetings
Prior to the commencement of high-risk operations, an operations meeting shall be
conducted with a checklist of critical items to be discussed during the meeting. The
checklist shall have, at a minimum, Stop Work Authority, Procedure Review, and RiskAssessment as topics to be covered during the meeting.
5.5 Crew Changes
Crew changes should take place in port at a shore facility if possible. Crew changes should be avoided during high risk marine operations. If crew changes must occur during “high-
risk operations”1, then the Chevron Project Manager and vessel operator shall ensure
mitigation measures are defined and implemented.
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
30/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 25
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
The Marine Contract Owner or Chevron Project Manager shall ensure that all vesseloperators shall have documented crew-change procedures. The crew-change procedures
shall include a handover meeting between the senior officers of the existing and
replacement crews. This handover meeting should address, at a minimum, the following:
Condition of the Vessel
- Any loading or discharging necessary- Any incidents during the last crew shift
- Any mechanical issues
- Any communication problems with installations
- A stability update
- Any dangerous cargoes onboard
- Any personnel transfers required
- Any special instruction ordered from installations and SIMOPS activities
Scheduled Sailing Time
Use of Stop Work Authority
Weather conditions
NOTE: “High risk operations” are defined as those operations where a specific risk assessment
has been conducted and the operations have been defined as High Risk.
5.6 Daily IFO Communication With All Vessels
Daily communication with all chartered vessels to reinforce Chevron’s IFO culture is
recommended. The communication shall begin with a reinforcing statement of the durationof incident free operations (e.g., “Marine transportation department is incident free for 263
days.”). Additional questions are asked based on BBS observations, any recent incidents,
Tenets of Operation, and SBU specific areas of concern. Examples of potential questionsare as follows:
Have you seen any unsafe actions?
Do you have any accidents, incidents or near misses to report?
Did vessel personnel use “Stop Work Authority” today?
Any crew members that need Chevron Orientation?
If hazmat material was loaded in the past 24 hours, did you receive the proper paperwork?
What was discussed during job safety analysis?
Do you have any short service employee aboard?
5.7 CHESM/MSW/MSRE Work In Progress Activi ties integration
5.7.1 Chevron facil itated Marine Contractors HES Meetings
Two (2) Chevron SBU facilitated Marine Contractor meetings per annum shall take place
for each contractor registered within the CHESM System. The contract owner (or delegate)shall set the meeting schedule and agenda. The purpose of the meetings is to share
8/9/2019 Upstream Marine Standard IBU Chevron
31/52
Upstream Marine Standard – U&G
1 January 2015. Revision 3.1 26
Printed 1 January 2015. Uncontrolled when printed.
contractors’ HES experiences, best practices and review the contractors’ marine safetymetrics. The events shall also be used to assess contractors’ performance against the
Chevron Seven Key Upstream Marine Expectations. The standard CHESM Performance
Review template shall be included within the meeting documentation and results reviewedduring each meeting. The data shall be shared with the CHESM Process Advisor by
appropriate means.
5.7.2 Joint OVMSA Verification & Assessment (JOVA) Activ ities
The CHESM Performance Review template is included in the standard Upstream JOVAProtocol and shall be completed during any JOVA Assessments. Completed JOVA reports
shall be made available to CHESM Advisors through the internal OVIS System (Offshore
Vessel Information System).
5.7.3 Field verif ication using SUPO (OVID Supplement) and otherinspections
A SUPO (OVID Supplemental) Inspection format is used across Upstream. The SUPO
form shall be used to supplement any existing Annual OVIQ Inspection (OCIMF, London)
and shall include local SBU parameters as necessary. The SUPO shall include the standardCHESM/MSW Field Verification template. All SBU Random inspection or otherinspection forms shall also include the CHESM/MSW Field Verification template.
5.7.4 MSW Leadership Engagement Procedure
Appendix A (MSW OE Process Leadership Engagement Procedure) Table 6 contains
specific requirements applicable to Chevron leaders. U&G leaders reinforce OE culture,
inst
Top Related