UPDATEDCOMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CSIP)
Implementing the Missouri Standards for Performance, Process and Resource used in the Missouri School Improvement Program
Presented to the Board of EducationJanuary 16, 2007
School District Planning Process
No Child Left Behind
(Federal mandate)
Missouri School Improvement
Program (MSIP) (State mandate)
Desegregation Settlement Agreement
….
Comprehensive School
Improvement Plan (CSIP)
(Local district mandate)
School Improvement Plan
(SIP)
School Improvement Plan
(SIP)
School Improvement Plan
(SIP)
School Improvement Plan
(SIP)
School Improvement Plan
(SIP)
The Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) requires that
every school district have a Comprehensive School Improvement Plan (CSIP). St. Louis
has not had a true CSIP in several years.
The CSIP identifies important long-range improvement issues related to student performance and describes a specific set of actions. The CSIP is a fluid document. It correlates to No Child Left Behind, the Desegregation Settlement Agreement and, most importantly, to the Missouri School Improvement Program (MSIP) Standards on which
the District will be judged in 2009.
The Importance of the CSIP
The CSIP has three main goals which reflect the District’s long range plan and the
MSIP Standards:
- Performance
- Process & Performance
- Resource
Three Main Goals of MSIP
Performance Goals
SLPS will establish and implement a framework based on continuous improvement to provide its students with high quality, research-based
curriculum and instructional materials taught by certified, trained and highly qualified teachers who know and practice principles of education
most likely to benefit the learning of urban students, especially identified student
subgroups struggling to reach proficiency.
Process & Performance Goals
SLPS will plan, implement and regularly monitor the effectiveness and efficiency of
its key leadership functions including administration, management and
communication in a transparent fashion based on actual data that directly impacts student
performance.
Resource Goals
SLPS will strive to meet individual key standards at the desirable level of compliance
as contained in the MSIP Standards & Indicators Manual while continuing to maintain
at least minimum standards at all levels.
For example, by 2010 –
– 68% of students will score at the proficient or advanced level in Communication Arts on the MAP test
– 64% of students will score at the proficient or advanced level in Mathematics on the MAP
Improving Academic Achievement For All Students
Strategies to Improve Academic Achievement
The CSIP provides numerous strategies, including:
- School Performance Teams
- School Improvement Plans
- Curriculum aligned with state standards and assessments
- Attendance targets
- Professional Development
• All school facilities will meet a score of 85% or higher during regular building inspections
• The number of serious incidents from behavior infractions will be reduced by 10% each year
Providing a Safe and Secure Learning Environment
Strategies to Increase Safety and Security
• Increased use of technology
• Staff training at all levels on the revised comprehensive emergency operations plan
• Character Education
• Monthly reviews of all facilities for cleanliness and maintenance issues
Improving Our Fiscal Stability• Expenditures will not exceed revenues in
any proposed District budget
• The overall deficit will continue to be reduced
• Utilization of existing facilities will be fully reviewed for efficiency
Additional Objectives
• Improving community outreach and education
• Increasing use of technology to streamline services and improve academics
• Increasing the number of certified teachers in classrooms
The CSIP will be the guide to move the district to full accreditation. As items come to the Board of Education for approval they will reflect the CSIP and MSIP goals being
addressed.
Annual Performance Report Projections for Accreditation
2007-2009
January 16, 2007
2007 – 2009 MAP Projections for Grades 3 – 5 Mathematics
Standard
9.1*12006 2007
Target2008 Target
2009 Target
2009
Status
MPIMissouri Performance Index
703.7 715.1 * 727.1 * 738.1 ** 721.0
LNDLevel Not Determined
0.8 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.0
Notes: The 2006 baseline data was obtained from DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006.http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/MAP115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 Targets and LND are projections only and are set to meet APR Requirements in 2009 per MSIP 4th Cycle Understanding Your APR 2006-2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdf** 2009 Target meets APR requirement using the Below Avg + Annual Measures in the Grade Span and Below Avg + Annual Measures in the Grade Level.Targets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when It becomes available from the state.
2007 – 2009 MAP Projections for Grades 3 – 5 Communication Arts
Standard
9.1*22006 2007
Target2008 Target
2009 Target
2009 Status
MPI 707.3 715.3 * 732.3 * 742.1 ** 726.0
LND 1.7 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.2
Notes: The 2006 baseline data was obtained from DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006.http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/MAP115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 Targets and LND are projections only and are set to meet APR Requirements in 2009 per MSIP 4th Cycle Understanding Your APR 2006-2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdf** 2009 Target meets APR requirement using the Below Avg + Annual Measures in the Grade Span and Below Avg + Annual Measures in the Grade Level.Targets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when It becomes available from the state.
2007 – 2009 MAP Projections for Grades 6 – 8 Mathematics
Standard
9.1*32006 2007
Target2008 Target
2009 Target
2009 Status
MPI 666.8 707.1 * 751.1 * 795.1 ** 730.0
LND 0.8 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.0
Notes: The 2006 baseline data was obtained from DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006.http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/MAP115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 Targets and LND are projections only and are set to meet APR Requirements in 2009 per MSIP 4th Cycle Understanding Your APR 2006-2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdf** 2009 Target meets APR requirement using the Annual Measure in the Grade Span and Avg + Annual Measures in the Grade Level.Targets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when It becomes available from the state.
2007 – 2009 MAP Projections for Grades 6 – 8 Communication Arts
Standard
9.1*42006 2007
Target2008 Target
2009 Target
2009 Status
MPI 685.9 721.4 * 771.4 * 821.4 ** 750.0
LND 1.7 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.2
Notes: The 2006 baseline data was obtained from DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006.http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/MAP115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 Targets and LND are projections only and are set to meet APR Requirements in 2009 per MSIP 4th Cycle Understanding Your APR 2006-2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdf** 2009 Target meets APR requirement using the High 2 + Annual Measures in the Grade Level. Targets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when It becomes available from the state.
2007 – 2009 MAP Projections for Grades 9 – 11 Mathematics
Standard
9.1*52006 2007
Target2008 Target
2009 Target
2009 Status
MPI 654.0 704.0 * 763.0 * 823.0 ** 736.0
LND 0.8 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.0
Notes: The 2006 baseline data was obtained from DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006.http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/MAP115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 Targets and LND are projections only and are set to meet APR Requirements in 2009 per MSIP 4th Cycle Understanding Your APR 2006-2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdf** 2009 Target meets APR requirement using the High 2 + Annual Measures in the Grade Level. Targets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when It becomes available from the state.
2007 – 2009 MAP Projections for Grades 9 - 11 Communication Arts
Standard
9.1*62006 2007
Target2008 Target
2009 Target
2009 Status
MPI 692.8 717.4 * 742.4 * 767.4 ** 730.0
LND 1.7 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.0 * 1.2
Notes: The 2006 baseline data was obtained from DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006.http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/MAP115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 Targets and LND are projections only and are set to meet APR Requirements in 2009 per MSIP 4th Cycle Understanding Your APR 2006-2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdf** 2009 Target meets APR requirement using the Annual Measure in the Grade Span and Avg + Annual Measures in the Grade Level.Targets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when It becomes available from the state.
2007 – 2009 APR Projections: ACT
2005 2006 2007 Target
2008 Target
2009 Target
5 Year Avg.
8.7% 12.6% 13.6% * 14.6% * 15.6% ** 13.0%% of GradsAt or AboveNat Average
Notes: The 2005 & 2006 baseline data was obtained from the DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/apr/2006d115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 data and targets are projections only and are set to meet APR requirements per 4th cycle MSIP Understanding Your APR 2006 – 2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdf** The 2009 Target meet the APR requirements using the Annual method in the Progress Measure. Targets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when it becomes available from the state.
StandardStandard9.39.3
2007 – 2009 APR Projections Advanced Courses
2005 2006 2007 Target
2008 Target
2009 Target
5 Year Avg.
49.6% 57.8% 57.8% * 57.8% * 57.8% * 56.2%% CreditsEarned in Advanced Courses
Notes: The 2005 & 2006 baseline data was obtained from the DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/apr/2006d115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 data and targets are projections only and are set to meet APR requirements per 4th cycle MSIP Understanding Your APR 2006 – 2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdfTargets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when it becomes available from the state.
StandardStandard9.4*19.4*1
2007 – 2009 APR Projections Career Education Courses
2005 2006 2007 Target
2008 Target
2009 Target
5 Year Avg.
12.5% 14.7% 15.0% * 16.0% * 16.5% * 14.9%% Credits Earned in CE Courses
Notes: The 2005 & 2006 baseline data was obtained from the DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/apr/2006d115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 data and targets are projections only and are set to meet APR requirements Per 4th cycle MSIP Understanding Your APR 2006 – 2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdfTargets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when it becomes available from the state.
StandardStandard9.4*29.4*2
2006 – 2008 APR Projections College Placement
2004 2005 2006 Target
2007 Target
2008 Target
5 Year Avg.
58.3% 55.9% 56.9% * 57.9% * 58.9% * 57.6%
Notes: The 2004 and 2005 baseline data was obtained from the DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006.http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/apr/2006d115115.html*The 2006 – 2008 data and targets are projections only and is set to meet APR requirements using Below Avg. method in the Status Measure + Annual method in the Progress Measure per 4th cycle MSIP Understanding Your APR 2006 – 2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdfTargets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when it becomes available from the state.
% of Grads Entering College
StandardStandard9.4*39.4*3
2006 – 2008 APR Projections Career Education Placement
2004 2005 2006 Target
2007 Target
2008 Target
5 Year Avg.
80.2% 74.5% 75.5% * 76.5% * 77.5% * 76.8%
Notes: The 2004 & 2005 baseline data was obtained from the DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/apr/2006d115115.html*The 2006 – 2008 data and targets are projections only and are set to meet APR requirements using the Average method in the Status Measure + Annual method in the Progress Measure per 4th Cycle MSIP Understanding Your APR 2006 – 2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdfTargets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when it becomes available from the state.
% CourseCompletersPlaced
StandardStandard9.4*49.4*4
2007 – 2009 APR Projections Graduation Rate
2005 2006 2007 Target
2008 Target
2009 Target
5 Year Avg.
60.2%
District
55.6%
Targets
93.0% *
70%
98.0% *
77%
100.0%**
85%
81.5%
70%
Notes: The 2005 & 2006 baseline data was obtained from the DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/apr/2006d115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 data and targets are projections only and are set to meet APR requirements in 2009 per 4th cycle MSIP Understanding Your APR 2006 – 2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdf** The 2009 Target meet the APR requirement using the Below Avg. method in the Status Measure + Annual/Rolling Avg. method(s) in the Progress Measure.Targets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when it becomes available from the state.
% Gradua-tion Rate
StandardStandard9.59.5
2007 – 2009 APR Projections Attendance Rate
2005 2006 2007 Target
2008 Target
2009 Target
5 Year Avg.
81.5%
District
83.1%
Targets
100.0% *
90%
100.0% *
91%
100.0%**
92%
92.9%
88%
Notes: The 2005 & 2006 baseline data was obtained from the DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/apr/2006d115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 data and targets are projections only and are set to meet APR requirements in 2009 per 4th cycle MSIP Understanding Your APR 2006 – 2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdf** The 2009 Target meet the APR requirement using the Below Avg. method in the Status Measure + Annual/Rolling Avg/3 over 2 method(s) in the Progress Measure.Targets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when it becomes available from the state.
GradesK - 12
StandardStandard9.69.6
2007 – 2009 APR Projections Subgroup Achievement
2006 2007 Target
2008 Target
2009 Target
Average
30.0%District Targets
85.0% *
40%
90.0% *
50%
95.0% **
60%
75.0%
45.0%
% of SubgroupsMET
Notes: The 2005 & 2006 baseline data was obtained from the DESE Website posted on December 1, 2006http://dese.mo.gov/planning/profile/apr/2006d115115.html*The 2007 – 2009 data and targets are projections only and are set to meet APR requirements in 2009 per 4th cycle MSIP Understanding Your APR 2006 – 2007.http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/UnderstandingYourAPR2006-2007-4thCycle2006.pdf** The 2009 Target meet the APR requirement using the High 2 method in the Status Measure. Targets are subject to change based on actual data and revisions to the APR rubric when it becomes available from the state.
StandardStandard9.79.7
Top Related