8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
1/75
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
2/75
Workers of all countries, unite!
Unity & Struggle
Organ of the International Conference of
Marxist-Leninist Parties and Organisations
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
3/75
Unity & Struggle
Journal of the International Conference of Marxist-Leninist Parties and Organisations.Published in English, Spanish, Turkish and Portuguese
in the responsibility of the Coordinating Committee of the International Conference.
Any opinions expressed in this journal belong to the contributors.
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
4/75
This version was created in August 2009 by the Movement for the Reorganisation of the KKE 1918-
55 with use of the texts found in the web page of TDKP (Revolutionary Communist Party of
Turkey).
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
5/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
5
CONTENTS
CHILE
Introduction to the debate on unity of opposites and the work among the massesCommunist Party of Chile (Proletarian Action)
COLOMBIA
The EPL has a revolutionary mission to fulfil
Communist Party of Colombia (M-L)
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
The anti-imperialist struggle today
Communist Party of Labour of Dominican Republic
ECUADORLetter from the CC of the M-L Communist Party of Ecuador to the CC of the Communist Party of
Colombia (M-L)
Marxist-Leninist Communist Party of Ecuador
FRANCE
The work of the Party within the working class
Workers Communist Party of France
MEXICO
The programme of social democracy in Mexico
Communist Party of Mexico (M-L)
SPAIN
On the struggle in the unions
Communist Organisation October of Spain
TURKEY
The trade union movement and the problems of trade union struggle
Revolutionary Communist Party of Turkey (TDKP)
Third International Meeting of Trade Unionists
Revolutionary Declaration from the Middle of the World
The First International Seminar: The Problems of the Revolution in Latin Americas
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
6/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
6
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
7/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
7
CHILE
Introduction to the debate on unity of opposites and the work
among the masses
The struggle against the enemies of the working class and the people (who are innumerable)
and the subsequent triumph
It is necessary to achieve the greatest possible unity between the theory and political action among
the most organised and advanced sections of the people. This task is one of the fundamental
functions of the party as the guide and vanguard of the proletariat. However, this task has to be
multiplied a hundred fold in the heart of the party itself in a single-minded manner with the aim of
ensuring that the party plays its role as the most significant part of the revolutionary struggle. This
signifies not only confronting in a united way all our enemies, from the petit bourgeoisie to big
business to drug traffickers to Trotskyist adventurists up to and including the big monopolist
enterprises, the bourgeois state and imperialism, but also our internal enemies, traitors and agentsand also conciliatory ideas inside our organisations.
Our ideological and political unity enables us to take the measure of our enemies, from those whom
we must attack as a priority, to those who we can afford to ignore, and even those from whom we
may gain support in a particular period; this is if we really wish to make the revolution and conquer
political power. That is to say as Lenin says "to make war in order to destroy the bourgeoisie ... (and
imperialism), a war a hundred times more difficult, prolonged and complex than the most bloody of
the current wars between states, and to renounce beforehand any manoeuvre which may exploit the
contradictory interests which divide our enemies, to renounce agreements and compromises with
possible allies (even though these may be provisional, inconsistent, changeable, and conditional), is
not this something which is indescribably ridiculous?" This quote taken from Left WingCommunism: An Infantile Disorder demonstrates that the activity of the party must orientate itself in
advance in accordance with objective reality, as much within the party itself as within the social and
ideological conditions surrounding us. Only in this way can we put into effect the universal proposal
of Marxism-Leninism, which consists in understanding our ideology as a guide to action and not as a
dogma.
In the following we will attempt as well as we can to put forward some ideas which may or may not
be new, as to how ideologically and scientifically and according to the argument previously
explained, we can develop our work in relation to the forces against us and also our work among the
masses which we aspire to, in accordance with the laws of the materialist dialectic.
In order to carry out in a more or less scientific way our revolutionary work in society -a society
which groups together an infinite number of elements including individuals and organisations- and
in order to understand our policies in relation to our development, our work of making alliances to
build unity and of struggling with the forces against us, we must place ourselves on the terrain of
overcoming contradictions, whether these be primary or secondary, this is because every
transformation from the most elementary to that of the entire society contains contradictions -
contradictions which signify unity and struggle with our enemies. This element deserves study and
application in a conscious manner. What has been said previously on the issue of contradictions and
how to take political advantage of them has been expressed clearly thus in the Communist
Manifesto: "The bourgeoisie produces before everything else its own grave-diggers, its destruction
and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable."
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
8/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
8
Opposites cannot exist one without the other, they appear together, one engenders the others, the
bourgeoisie engenders the proletariat. To the degree that the bourgeoisie develops, it broadens the
sector of industrial production and increases the number of the proletariat, their number and their
concentration and to the same degree their strength. At the same time the proletariat engenders the
bourgeoisie in as much as it is their labour which produces capital:
"If we suppose that under conditions otherwise equal, the composition of capital is maintainedunchanged, this is because in order to put into motion a determined quantity of means of production
or constant capital, this always requires the same amount of labour power. It is evident that the
demand for labour and the subsistence level of the workers will be created in proportion to capital,
and the more rapidly capital develops the more rapidly this will grow... The reproduction of labour
power which continually has to be incorporated as the means of giving value to capital cannot be
separated from capital. This also means that the relationship of the subjection of labour to capital
always remains and workers have only the option of selling their labour to one capitalist rather than
another. This constitutes the reality of capitalist reproduction. Therefore, accumulation of capital
must mean an increase in the proletariat." (K. Marx, Vol. I, The Capital)
The unity of opposites in the capitalist system is skilfully hidden when it comes to the division
between rich and poor and people of good or bad fortune. In fact, these form a unity as Marx
explained in the previous quote. Those who posses the means of production need to exploit those
who do not posses them; those who have no means of production see that in order to live they must
put themselves at the service of those who posses them. For that reason, it is impossible to overcome
the proletariat without first getting rid of the bourgeoisie.
Opposites clash, struggle without ceasing the one against the other and modify each other
reciprocally. What does the struggle of the bourgeoisie consist of? Its aim is the maximum
exploitation of the workers and prevention of their self organisation.
As regards to proletarian struggle this has reproduced itself since the beginning of the proletariat's
existence and wherever it exists, even though this struggle can take different economic and political
forms, faces different objective limitations, and may sometimes for a while be repressed. However, it
occurs everywhere, because the conditions of existence make it necessary for the transformation of
society. It is in this struggle that class consciousness is created.
The forces of struggle act one upon the other, modifying each other reciprocally, with the forms
adopted for the class struggle changing relation to the balance of forces. For example, the
bourgeoisie tries to prevent all proletarian workers' organisations, such as the Party, and especially
the revolutionary Party which is the summit of all organisations, and when this is impossible or even
counter-productive, when the level of struggle is such that it would be better to try to moderate theconflict, the bourgeoisie then attempts to dominate the workers' organisations and divide them. In the
same way, ideological struggle changes with the progress of revolutionary ideas, and when it is no
longer possible to ignore them, the bourgeoisie propagates the excellence of the capitalist system and
also tries to falsify those ideas by infiltrating them like a Trojan horse, and thus giving birth to
revisionism.
From this we can understand that it is impossible to single out any one of the forces of struggle. If
we study one while forgetting another we cannot understand the manoeuvres of the bourgeoisie,
whether political or ideological, and we may as a result underestimate the workers movement, and
fail to understand it as a class, forgetting that it exists within capitalist rule and that it suffers
formidable pressure from the bourgeois class which dominates and exploits it. From this it follows
that the struggle of opposites is inseparable from the existence of classes, that no conciliation is
possible, and that the struggle will only end with the seizure of political power and with the
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
9/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
9
formation of a new state of things, in which these opposites will tend to disappear under the
dictatorship of the proletariat. We have to distinguish between primary and secondary contradictions
and we have to be capable of evaluating them in order to be able to prioritise our enemies so that
they can be eliminated or overcome one by one.
In order to study the foundations of this contradiction we have taken as an example the contradiction
between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, which is the fundamental and primary contradiction ofcapitalist society; but this society is not made up only of this contradiction for within it there are
others, for instance, monopolist bourgeoisie against non-monopolist, and the bourgeoisie's various
political tendencies and philosophical currents, etc. With the development of imperialism "new"
contradictions are formed.
Of course, contradictions are derived from the same class division of society; contradictions between
imperialism and the colonies or neocolonies derived from neoliberalism, contradictions occurring
through financial chains between rich and poor countries, national and ethnic problems, etc... All
these contradictions play their historical role and have to be uncovered and approached in a scientific
manner, if we do not wish to simplify reality too much and to fall into vulgar ideas of essentialism oridealism. However, undoubtedly, these cannot all be put on the same level since some contradictions
are primary and others not. On the other hand, at different times the contradictions we have
discussed can change position moving from being principle to being secondary or overcome by
others.
The various contradictions operate, as we have said, one upon the other. Secondary contradictions
depend for their origin on the main ones and they grow with the development of these; for example,
the struggle for greater democracy, for freedom of organisation, for concrete objectives, with
immediate and long-term programmes (as expressed in the Democratic Popular Assembly), do not
immediately signify socialism and proletarian socialism, but certainly they signify a transformation
in the correlation of forces, of the bourgeois state, of national and international capital, at a givenmoment, and they effectively help the advent of socialism.
A truly revolutionary party can and in various conditions must make use of the existence of
secondary contradictions in order to form alliances with one tendency of the bourgeoisie against the
common enemy from the view of a limited objective, (e.g. struggle against fascism, defence of the
country, etc.) or more concretely in the heart of the "left" for aims related to making propaganda for
one's ideas.
Therefore, it is necessary to study also secondary contradictions in order not to be reductionist in
relation to the richness of reality, in order to maintain a political conduct which is flexible and able
to differentiate between different periods, and in order to link these contradictions to the main one.We should not lose sight of what is essential and of the proposition central to our actions and all our
party struggle, that is, to resolve in our favour and in that of the class the contradiction between the
bourgeoisie and the proletariat through the socialist revolution and the following development
towards communism.
Antonio Fierro
Communist Party of Chile (Proletarian Action)
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
10/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
10
COLOMBIA
The EPL has a revolutionary mission to fulfil
The value of the armed struggle
This is an important time to reaffirm the significance and the validity of the armed revolutionarystruggle. The XIVth Congress proposed that the various forms of revolutionary violence respond to
the reality in which our people live and struggle; to the sharpening of social contradictions; to the
cruel political and economic offensive of imperialism and of the bourgeoisie; to the characteristics of
state domination; to social and historical reasons, and in the conditions in which the struggle for
power is posed. These forms have been generated from political struggle and from the struggles of
the people. They are not alien or mere accessories to those. Nor are they the production of the
subjective will of the left, but rather they are a consequence of reality. While such objective and
subjective factors persist so the armed struggle and the guerrilla movement must continue their
existence, and this expression of revolutionary violence maintains its significance and validity.
We must emphasise the enormous intervention of imperialism in Colombia as being at the root of the
changes in the world situation since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Within this framework we
must not underestimate the importance of the Andina strategy worked out by the Pentagon and the
Southern Command which has the DEA as its main executive given the importance which the US
attaches to it in the struggle against narcotics trade. In the present situation of the country what
stands out is the profound crisis of the state which exhibits the following structural problems:
- A view of the state which promotes social disintegration and national disunity;
- The weakening of the legitimacy of state institutions due to the flagging of their social support and
the failure of confidence generated by this;
- The extreme strengthening of the Executive, especially the President;- The decline and lack of credibility of parliament, corroded by sleaze and scandals;
- The politicisation of the judiciary system which, on top of everything, has oriented itself towards
war, thus exaggerating the contradictions between the State and its citizens;
- The conversion of exceptional measures into normal ones and the extension of the State of
Emergency, that is to say the state of war, now in the name of internal unrest;
- The opposing of ruling casts by the making of changes, however minimal these may be, in favour
of majorities economically, politically and socially;
- Rampant and defiant militarism which puts its plans and its ambitions above national interests;
- The strengthening of militarism and repression as a permanent line of action on the part of the
State;
- The intensification of private and State violence which expresses itself in attacks on protests and
social struggles, and in crimes, threats, and pressures against fighters for the people.
Certainly the profound crisis and the corruption of the State lie behind the grave problems which
characterise the present situation. The State is ready to use force in order to guarantee super
exploitation in favour of a privileged elite, in order to maintain unjust social relations and a closed
political order, to protect the status quo at the cost of the blood and sweat of the Colombians who are
forced to submit to the yoke of neoliberalism.
The State invests many resources in anti-popular warfare and in generalised repression, and every
day it invests less in the people's needs as regards health, poverty, unemployment, hunger, andhelplessness. This situation, as is logical, provokes discontent, protests and popular struggles; this
reality is justification for confronting the violence of the state and of the dominant classes.
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
11/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
11
The conjunction of the factors described above shows us a closed democracy, alienated from the
needs of majority, that does not allow the participation of its citizens in the solution of the problems
which are the result of its own governance. Some political commentators say that the existence of
the insurgence does not allow any room for the exercise of democracy or of the left opposition, and
with this argument they justify the behaviour of the State. In the concrete conditions of Colombia,
faced with the shutting down of democratic solutions, Pedro Vasquez says that "the struggle is more
like a key than a padlock". It may not seem useful to insist on following this argument in defence ofthe validity of revolutionary armed struggle, however, this is the reference point for many diverse
theories and theses tending to minimise, question or deny it.
The EPL must not lower its banners
It is necessary to reaffirm the statement of the XIVth Congress: "In the present situation of Colombia
it is not enough just to define in principle our adhesion to revolutionary violence and to the
establishment of the revolutionary way to the seizure of power." Revolutionary violence is present
today in the reality of our country expressing itself in the existence of guerrilla forces, in particular
of the Simon Bolivar Co-ordinated Guerrilla Organisation, in the various forms of massorganisations to exercise armed struggle and in the spontaneous uprisings in various sectors and
areas of the country.
There exist in the country elements of popular warfare which are deepening at the same time as they
are maintaining their objectives of social confrontation.
We believe that conditions do not yet present themselves for insurrection in the short-term or for the
total generalisation of popular warfare. Nevertheless, the elements of revolutionary war in existence
should be made more powerful by us as part of the revolutionary accumulation of forces towards the
seizure of power.
The truth is that there do not exist new factors in the present situation of the country which justify
changes contradicting these clear definitions. On the contrary, there has been an accumulation of
new facts which support the necessity of insisting on them. For this reason, I consider it right to
ratify the position of no renunciation of the ideas which guide us, no laying down of our banners nor
going back on the agreements which we have made. Of course, this is an attitude which has practical
consequences and is not only an expression of feeling. It means that the Party and the EPL must
keep our red revolutionary flags hoisted.
In the present situation the war declared by the State has special significance, because this influences
every aspect of the reality of our country. In effect the State has launched a generalised offensive,
political and military, against the revolutionary forces, against the democratic forces, and against theleaders of the people and of the social sectors who are protesting and struggling against the injustices
of big capital and of the State. As outstanding elements of the development of this total war, it is
worth pointing out:
- The intensification of psychological warfare and of black propaganda aimed at de-legitimising the
insurgence, for example, by describing them as narco guerrillas, the abandonment of revolutionary
ideals, the violation of human rights, the compulsory child labour, etc. In this we must take into
account the increased power given to the bourgeoisie through new means of communication.
- The tendency towards a greater militarisation of the life of the country and towards giving more
freedom of action to the Armed Forces. As examples we can point out the extreme increase of
resources for war and the seeking of more support from the US for the struggle against the
insurgents.
-The encouragement of para-militarism which is proposing aims of strengthening itself and
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
12/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
12
expanding to more strategic areas and which is looking for political recognition with the support of
political and social groups which will not undermine it.
Within this situation, the EPL has suffered very serious blows whose effects have not been
completely understood. It is possible that due to the serious situation confronting the organisation
and the attacks by the media, there are appearing cases of demoralisation, uncertainty, lack of
enthusiasm, the desire to retire or to give up everything and not to think about the past. In general,we can say that such positions are linked to a narrow and unfocused view of the present situation of
the country and of the perspectives of the revolutionary movement. It is feasible that there is
ignorance of some situations as they develop or that there are incorrect evaluations of some facts; it
is probable that what is being lost is a view of the positive factors which are accumulating and which
can lead to changes in the political situation. Because of this it is useful and opportune to gauge
correctly, or at least to try to present the development undergone by the insurgency: It is officially
recognised -these are not stories of mine- that in the course of the 1990s the number of activists in
the CGSB has increased by mush more than 50 per cent; the territorial expansion indicates that in
recent years, where there used to be 170 municipalities where the insurgency had a presence, today it
is based in 600 municipalities, with significant political influence; it has achieved important militaryand operational gains; it has also consolidated itself in important social and political sectors, as well
as having widened its international relations.
Although, it is true that the EPL has to confront some very serious difficulties, it has contributed to
that progress which is due to the uprising of which the EPL forms a part, and it is not isolated from
the positive tendencies which are developing, notwithstanding the negative factors which it would be
wrong to underestimate. We must bear in mind the situation around us, because the truth is that we
are not alone, not in Colombia nor in the world.
What has been said beforehand is bound to the belief that the uprising in Colombia will continue to
be a political factor in the transformation of the country's situation. It is completely false to suggestthat the uprising has been affected by decadence or that it is falling into decadence or that it lacks
revolutionary perspectives.
What is in decadence and lacks perspective is the Colombian state and political regime. If we
assume this basic position, it is certain that we can emerge from this serious situation affecting us at
present.
The EPL notwithstanding the complex situation that is confronting it has certain possibilities of
overcoming negative factors:
- It remains present in the actual situation of the country;- It can count on members (no matter the number) who are ready to expend every energy in
overcoming the obstacles;
- It is taken into account in important political and social sectors;
- It can count on the leadership of the party and on correct policies to guide its revolutionary action.
- It is well positioned, with the orientation of the Party and with the support of other forces, to
transform the situation that affects it today.
In the past, faced with situations as serious or even more so than the present, what has allowed us to
continue making progress? Without doubt, it has been the qualities which belong to our
revolutionary organisation.
- The complete conviction that what we are doing is right;
- Confidence in the success of the cause which inspires our struggle and in the objectives which we
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
13/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
13
put forward;
- Achieving the support of the sectors of the people;
-The readiness of men and women to unite with the struggle and to persist in it;
- The moral principles that we follow;
- The prestige won by our organisation and the recognised authority it has in the political arena.
Fearless in confronting changes
It is evident that significant changes are presenting themselves in the country's situation. How could
it not be so? Problems arise when we interpret these changes, because it is here that differences arise.
With regard to the transformations and actions related to the uprising, we find people putting
forward judgements and prejudices, deductions, speculations and conclusions of the most varied
kinds, sometimes with the explicit intention of discrediting the Revolutionary Armed Struggle. For
example:
- That the collapse of the USSR caused the decadence of the armed movement in Colombia because
it left it without ideological and political foundations. Critics argue that it has lacked consistencysince the USSR has not been a theoretical and political support for the Colombia guerrillas.
- That the guerrillas lack political and objective bases which would allow them to put forward
serious alternatives. The truth is that the uprising, above all since the 1980s, is that which has offered
the most attempts at solutions, up to the point that in many cases they have been adopted by political
sectors or even by the state.
- That the CGSB has not explained its political projects nor has it said what it proposes to achieve
peace, when in fact the CGSB and every one of its organisations has made every effort to explore
ways that might lead to peace with social justice. Since the first years of the government of Belisario
Betancur up until the present this has been constant.
- That the armed movement does not have popular support but instead through violence forces
people to unite with or support it. On top of this it is said that without the voluntary backing of
important popular sectors the armed movement could not exist and even less could it develop.
- That the leaders of the armed movement are "dinosaurs" because they defend an obsolete theory
and out of date objectives which do not have any relevance to the present as if any attack could
destroy revolutionary theory and the longing to transform a reality which is laden with injustices
fought against by revolutionary leaders. The theory which we defend and which we apply is not
static but nor is it incorrect.
- That the guerrilla war is the cause of the country's problems and is an obstacle in economic
development. What is certain is that the uprising is not a cause but a result of society's grave
problems, of unbearable injustice, of social contradictions, of the crisis of the state and of the
violence which this exercises against the people.
- That the uprising has become degraded, that it is turned into "narco-guerrilla", into common
delinquency and terrorism; that it has left behind it its revolutionary demands and its good intentions,
but its main objective is its own enrichment. etc. Even though it is necessary to recognise errors and
recognised cases of bad behaviour, everything tells us that this has not changed the revolutionary
nature of the uprising, nor has it wiped out its moral principles or the higher level of altruism which
is integral to uprising.
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
14/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
14
-That the guerrilla movement finds itself in a dead end; that there is no way out for it and that for this
reason it has to re-incorporate itself in civil life or struggle for its aims through other means
permitted by society. The facts show, on the contrary, that the uprising continues to be an
irreplaceable factor to achieve profound changes and a point of reference for the transformations
which society requires.
- That the guerrillas has achieved advances in military terrain, but not on the political plane. What iscomplicated is that it is not made clear what is meant by advances on the political plane. One must
understand by this that some people would prefer that the uprising should take the social democratic
way or the road of demobilisation, already experimented with and with the results that we know.
As we can see, all these criticisms are united in their aim of discrediting the uprising and
undermining its validity. Certainly there are differences among those who argue these positions,
differences of intention or of class consciousness. In any case it is necessary to deepen our
understanding of the real meaning contained in them so that we may give adequate answers.
We must also take note that there are some criticisms motivated by the aim of seeking changes inpositions, attitudes or behaviour in the armed organisations: and sometimes it is not easy to establish
clearly the differences between the one and the other. From this we see the necessity of making
analyses with care, with complete seriousness, without prejudices but without a blank mind...
It is obvious that enormous changes have happened in the world and in Colombia which it would not
be correct underestimate, such as the collapse of the USSR, new international relationships,
globalisation, the strengthening of the predominance of the US in Latin America, the processes of
pacification in Central America, the changes contained in the constitution of 1991, the steps towards
demobilisation and towards reintegration, the scandals over corruption, etc.
Also the increase in militarisation, the expansion of para-militarism, the extinction or liquidation ofpolitical opposition, the attacks on all social protest, the consequences of the application of
neoliberalism. All these factors have had a significant effect on political action and on social
relations. And they demand changes in political orientation and action, with the imperative of
responding in a revolutionary way. In this we have serious deficiencies, because it can happen that
the sequence of developments overcomes the dynamic of theoretical explanations.
From all these situations political consequences are derived. They reawaken questions, they suggest
innovations or they demand recognition in political orientation. In the past, we have studied or
debated some questions which now acquire greater significance alongside others which are arising in
the present: The characteristics of the Marxist-Leninist party, the relationships between the party and
the different forms of popular struggle, the situation of the popular movement: that of ebbs and flows(is the movement being set back or is it in the process of recovery?); the validity of the Armed
Struggle and the subordination of the armed organisation to the party, the various forms of practice
of revolutionary violence, the popular participation in the Armed Struggle, the development of the
Armed Struggle and its relationship with other forms of popular struggle; in which sectors should the
emphasis put on the building of the FAP? In what areas should guerrilla forces be established? The
political direction of actions, the characteristics of the building of a revolutionary army, the unity of
the guerrilla forces. And many other innumerable questions to be posed and to be answered.
As has been said earlier, these matters should not be posed as something new since there are already
in existence discussions and conclusions which at the very least can serve as reference points. What
is correct is to tackle sharply and with seriousness the issues posed as this will permit us to draw out
clear lines, as opposed to any improvisations or leaps into the unknown.
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
15/75
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
16/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
16
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
The anti-imperialist struggle today
In view of the present day problems of the revolutionary process in Latin America it is useful to lay
out the foundations and challenges of the anti-imperialist struggle in the historic conditions of today.
The question of the anti-imperialist struggle, as all propositions derived from previous political
experience and applied to the modes and reflective imperatives of today, is submitted to questioning
and must be re-argued in relation to the new realities that surround it.
The theoretical speculation of post-modernist philosophers and sociologists suggests that every
theoretical vision prior to its own will be incapable of making an evaluation of the reality and the
consequent orientation of actions which put forth an adequate transformation of the above.
According to this point of view, the previous theoretical scaffolding founded on reason and the
illustration in its most revolutionary orientation would be an anachronism.
According to this criterion we are living in a new post-industrial and post-modern era whose essence
will be "fundamentally different from the capitalist mode of production which has dominated during
the (last) two centuries," (Collinicos, A., 1993, Bogota, Against Post-Modernism, p. 25)
The philosophy which serves as the basis of post-modernism comes from the thesis of the French
"post-structuralist" theoreticians among whose authors Michel Foucault stands out. His views can be
summed up as postulating the fragmentary, heterogeneous and plural character of reality, denying to
human thought the capacity of objectively explaining that reality and understanding the human being
as an "incoherent mass of trans-individual impulses...," (op. cit., p. 22).
Sociology, on the one hand, argues the theory of post-industrial society according to which thetransformations that have occurred in the West in the last decades indicate that "the developed world
finds itself in a state of transition from an economy based on industrial production, towards an
economy in which systematic theoretical investigation becomes the main force of change, a
transformation of incalculable social, political and cultural consequences," (loc. cit.).
In the reference previously summed up about the theory of post-modernism it is clear that the point
of the departure on which we should concentrate our analysis and debate is on the following
question: is it true that the present evolution of society is fundamentally different from capitalism as
it has previously been known?
The concept "fundamentally different" refers to a qualitative notion, that is to say it assumes
substantial changes in the essence of the system; a difficult hypothesis to demonstrate if we rely on
the internal logic of the development of capitalism. In the so-called post-industrial and post-modern
era in which there have been technological and social innovations which have drastically spurred on
the form of production, there continues to prevail the objective of individual accumulation and
appropriation of the wealth produced, as well as the condition sine-qua-non of capitalist production:
the exploitation of the wage labour force (surplus-value) independent of the form which this takes in
the context of automisation and robotics.
The fact that the bases upon which the system is constructed continue in force is revealed when we
take into account the persistence of social calamities historically inherent in capitalism:unemployment, lack of work, poverty, danger of war, etc. In the light of this situation the so-called
"new era" only makes sense in the fertile imagination of post-modernist discourse.
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
17/75
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
18/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
18
domination about international drug-trafficking, the environment, international migration and
extremist nationalisms.
The present world reality clearly demonstrates that imperialist domination assumes specific
characteristics not seen before, and this forces us to re- establish political theory as well as practice
to persevere in the anti-imperialist struggle with a view to national liberation.
Has the epoch changed?
The validity of the anti-imperialist struggle and social change often is questioned these days by the
argument that such a vision of social reality corresponds to an epoch which has already been
superseded by the evolution of capitalism itself.
Are we perhaps living in a different epoch than that of capitalist domination?
The new realities that exist in the world of capitalist economy, society and culture have to be
appraised and evaluated as to how they affect the characterisation of the system as well as the theory.But the objective approach of such situations does not necessarily lead to the idea that the system
itself has been superseded, as the theoreticians of the so-called post-capitalist, post-industrial or post-
modern era claim.
The distinctive features which primarily brand the present epoch as capitalist and imperialist
continue in force and the recent and important advances of science and technology in the field of
production, circulation and consumption have only caused a renewal of the bases on which the
system rests raised to higher levels by its own reproduction.
The theories in vogue can not annul the reality of the laws inherent in capitalism as the framework in
which all the current technological processes take place and whose impact have given rise to themost fanciful speculations about the supposed arrival of a new historic epoch.
"The theoreticians of post-industrialism... maintain that the advanced societies are leaving behind a
historic era which could be defined as industrial." This is causing a fundamental transformation, of
such a degree that the "fundamental principles" of the society are found increasingly in "theoretical
knowledge" as opposed to "capital-labour." (Lyon, D., 1994, p.173, Post-Modernity, Alliance
Publishers, Madrid).
To claim that the capital-labour relation has been displaced by some other factor such as
"information-processing" as the basis on which the system is built, is to lose sense of reality. Such a
claim can only be maintained by ignoring the process that gives rise to the extraordinary volume ofinformation available today, behind whose production is found precisely the capital-labour relation.
We warn that to accept as true and valid that hypothesis leads to setting up a tendency for the
working class to disappear or lose specific weight, which is another of the post-modernist thrusts. In
this respect we observe that the reality of the facts themselves gives the lie to that claim, if we
remember that the increasing weight of services in the world economy does not seem to be produced
at the expense of industry, but of agriculture. This is made clear by the increasing urbanisation of the
whole social life in all national contexts.
The claim of the "obsolescence of the paradigm of production" expressed in the ideas and concepts
as "post-capitalist" and post-industrialism" leads to the rejection of the theory of the analysis of
capitalism itself (especially Marxism) for the understanding of capitalist society in its present
evolution.
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
19/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
19
If we accept the fact that the production of services is gaining in contrast to the production of
manufactured goods, as demonstrating that this phenomenon necessarily modifies social relations,
then it becomes evident that the relation of capital and labour and the consequent reproduction of the
exploiting and exploited classes, owners and wage labourers, characterises the primary agents of
production.
For the aims of revolutionary political theory and action it is important to consider some of theimplications that in this sense results from the evolution of contemporary capitalist society.
In the first place, for the analysis of classes one has to re-consider the composition of the working
class since, in the conditions of increasing scientific-technological advances, the level of skill of the
workers is also progressively demanding. That situation together with other factors of the crisis has
been causing the incorporation into the ranks of the working class of a broad layer of professionals,
whose conditions of life and of work are gradually becoming closer to the social culture and practice
of the wage worker. This point can be confirmed by the massive incorporation of these sectors in the
trade union struggles.
What will be the future impact of this situation on the general conduct of the working classes and
how will it influence the processes of the accumulation of forces for social change? The question of
what will be the continuation of the evolution of these phenomena must be considered from the
perspective of free, unprejudiced thought.
Another aspect of the high strategic value which it is worthwhile to consider is that of the
implications of the globalisation of the economy for nations since the relation established in this
context between nation and market is claimed by the spokespersons of post-industrialism and post-
modernism as the basis to question the validity of the nation-state.
In effect the imperialist strategy has used the word "interdependence" to indicate the terms ofrelations of countries and nations in the context of globalisation of the domination of the so-called
central economies over the rest of the world. In this context the imperialist forces advocate a
supposed mutual dependency among the economies of different countries, which in the logic of the
system can only operate through the continual transference of capital and other resources from the
oppressed nations to the industrialised oppressor nations.
Part of the strategy of imperialist domination, raised in the neoliberal plan, is the disintegration of
the national economies of our countries and by this method the further strengthening of the
multinationals and the world market at their service.
From here on arise the discussion and the plans aimed at annihilating the national states of thecountries subordinated to the large centres of the world economy.
In this situation and in the light of the predominant characteristics in the evolution of the current
economic processes, the question of the nation takes on new meaning for the forces of social change.
The real danger which is derived from the disintegration of the nation obliges the revolutionaries to
place emphasis on the national struggle as the guarantee of preserving conditions which make viable
the plan of social change, which in the framework of a nation liquidated in its historical- cultural
foundations, with an economy and social agents totally eradicated from its territory, will lose all
possibility of constructing its identity.
This approach is objective. The international character of the working class and its interests in the
conditions of imperialism does not ignore but rather presupposes national interests; this is so given
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
20/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
20
the law of unequal development of capitalism whose logic will always produce the ripening of the
conditions (of crisis) for change in a specific context and not necessarily in the totality of the system.
In this sense it is correct to put forward the national framework as a viable scenario for revolutionary
social change in the conditions of imperialism.
It seems to me that the evolution of the contradictions of society in its present evolution, will place
the national question in the centre of the struggle for social change. That is the reality despite thediversionary theories about a supposed change of epoch.
Aquiles Castro
July 1997
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
21/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
21
ECUADOR
Letter from the CC of the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party
of Ecuador
to the CC of the Communist Party of Colombia (M-L)Comrades of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Colombia (M-L):
The unity of principles and aims which inspire both our parties, the long standing revolutionary
friendship which we have made through the victories and vicissitudes of the revolution in Colombia
and in Ecuador, the tradition of party relations based Marxism-Leninism and proletarian
internationalism, characterised by openness and sincerity, and by mutual respect, encourages us and
in fact obliges us to participate in the important debate which is taking place within the Communist
Party of Colombia (M-L).
The anti-communist offensive, the repressive activities of imperialism and of the Colombianbourgeoisie by means of their armed forces, of the specialised repressive forces, of secret agents and
of paramilitaries; the divisive activity initiated by the enemies of our class through opportunists and
traitors, all this has inflicted series blows against the working class and the Colombian people,
against the popular revolutionary movement, and in particular against the revolutionary party of the
proletariat of Colombia, against the CP of Colombia (M-L) and against the glorious Popular Army of
Liberation (EPL). These have been strong attacks, and they have imp[lied political and military
battles won by reaction against revolution. However, we are dealing with temporary and partial
defeats, which are part of a process during which the forces of the proletariat and the Colombian
people have themselves also won important victories which although themselves having a partial
character are stages towards the conquest of the popular power.
The CP of Colombia (M-L) and the EPL come from a long and rich tradition of struggle. Having
taken Marxism-Leninism as their theoretical and political guide, they have understood how to
interpret Colombian society and to take the road of social revolution; they have made every effort to
link the forces of the proletariat to that of the people, to the popular masses; they have actively
involved themselves for thirty years in the revolutionary armed struggle taking place in Colombia;
they have known how to defend revolutionary proletarian beliefs and Marxism-Leninism from its
detractors, how to combat opportunism and revisionism both within and outside their ranks, and their
principle aim has been to preserve and defend the role and the nature of the Leninist party; they have
put into effect important contributions to the international revolutionary proletariat, to the fight of
the peoples against imperialism, and to proletarian internationalism.
We, the Marxist-Leninist communists of Ecuador are firmly convinced that our sister party of
Colombia will, once more, know how to defeat adversity, and the attacks of reaction and
imperialism, as well as how to strengthen themselves in the political and ideological struggle now
going on within their ranks. The debate started by the CC and which is taking place within the party
must lead to the affirmation of revolutionary principles and of Marxism-Leninism, it must bequeath
to the party revolutionary politics which are more correct and more appropriate, it must enrich itself
through accumulated theory and experience.
The questions being put forward, according to our point of view, should have to do with the
overriding problems of the Colombian revolution on an international scale. The results of thisdiscussion will have for this reason repercussions in the revolutionary movement of the working
class and of the people and in particular in the international communist Marxist-Leninist movement.
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
22/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
22
I- In our view, the ebbing of revolutionary forces which has occurred in recent years, is a problem
which must be analysed in its entirety, in its causes and its contradictions. As communists, we must
follow attentively the correlation of forces within our country, on our continent and in the world.
To make a correct social, economic and political analyses, it is necessary to base ourselves on the
progressive factors in the movement of society, to learn to measure the level of consciousness of the
popular masses, their state of mind, to be aware of the strategy and tactics of the class enemy withthe aim of ensuring that in every moment of revolutionary activity we are able to guide the forces of
the revolution, to affirm its social base, to consolidate and broaden it, in brief, to advance the process
of the building of the revolutionary forces.
We, the Marxist-Leninists of Ecuador, in spite of not struggling in Colombia, but with the
knowledge that we have of the social and political struggle taking place there, affirm that just as is
happening in our country this ebbing of revolutionary forces has touched bottom in Colombia and at
the present moment we are dealing with a recuperation of the popular revolutionary movement,
which is expressing itself in important mobilisations and strikes in the working class, particularly
among the public sector workers (for example the strike of February 1997), of the peasantry ofvarious regions (the fighting days of Putumayo, Huila, Santanderes, etc.), and of various sectors and
regions for their rights. This recovery has turned itself into a revolutionary military offensive on the
part of FARC and ELN which in recent times have shaken Colombia. For us the resolutions in the
document "A Necessary Correction" which we print below, are evidence of this statement.
"An important fact is derived from these events: the political movement of democrats, workers and
masses is setting the scene for debate and unification, is proposing a policy and a programme to
reclaim the voice of the revolutionary left and of the guerrilla movement in its discussions, to
intervene openly in national debates and to develop organisational and unifying forms which
however are still embryonic and limited in their capacity for mobilisation and struggle. This
highlights the fact that the guerrilla forces do not have a policy, or that they are finished, or that theyare afraid to confront the army. From this period derives a new stage in the conditions of the armed
conflict, for example, within the context of direct armed intervention from American imperialism,
with the strengthening of every section of the armed forces, and with the widening and legalised role
of paramilitarism. Or, also in certain conditions there may open before us a negotiation on different
bases from those which applied on previous occasions."
We are of the opinion that these lines demonstrate a situation not of ebbing, that they express how
the popular revolutionary movement of Colombia is developing, that they demand from the forces of
the revolutionary proletariat the need of positioning themselves in relation to this situation, of
readjusting their forces in order to involve themselves more actively in this process. The objective
and subjective conditions of the revolution are advancing, the communist forces have an obligationto clarify the direction and to put themselves in front of this new stage of the Colombian revolution.
The attacks of reaction, the defeats of revolutionaries, must be overcome. The counter-revolution is
powerful but it is not invincible. The capitalist nature of Colombia, the deepening of the general
crisis pose the problem of revolution as an immediate question, and the proletariat and its party as
the protagonists in this.
II- The revolutionary forces in Colombia consist of the proletariat and other workers of the city and
of the country. This is undeniable.
With regard to the role of the working masses, of the movement of the working class and other
popular sectors of the city, the document of the CC to which we are referring is clear and forceful.
We subscribe completely to these statements.
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
23/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
23
With regard to the references to the peasantry and other workers in the Colombian countryside as
actors in the revolution it is necessary to pause a little for consideration. The Document states that
the massive depopulation from countryside has resulted in the last ten years in 85 per cent of the
population living in the cities , and only 50 per cent living in rural areas. We do not doubt these
statistics, but for us the problem goes beyond the number of inhabitants, it has to do with the
productive process and with the political and social attitudes of the classes.
In Colombia, to a high degree, this depopulation of the countryside goes along with the process of
capitalist development, and has accelerated with the globalisation of the economy; it is the result of
the repressive actions of the police, army, and paramilitaries; it is also the result of the diminishing
of the revolutionary war, and of the impact of the rural guerrilla forces which have almost 50 years
of vigilance behind them; this process of depopulation is also a response to the aspirations of the
peasant masses to have access to the benefits of urban life, to their search for work and for
opportunities; and to their desire to escape from violence.
The depopulation of the countryside has economic limits. The system cannot do without agrarian
production and the exploitation of mineral resources. The development of technology, the increasinguse of mechanised agriculture, the reorganisation of the large private properties cannot eliminate the
work of labour individuals, on the contrary they make it more important and more necessary. In no
country of the world have we seen the elimination of the rural economy and even less is this likely to
take place in countries such as Colombia where there is a large availability of land and of other
natural resources such as water and forest, flowers and animals, and biodiversity.
The Colombian peasantry has accumulated significant political knowledge. It has actively
participated in the life of the Republic, and has been a protagonist in civil wars, political movements,
setbacks and revolutions. During the last fifty years it has been deeply involved in large-scale social
and political mobilisations, for its own rights. (Witnesses to this are the great days of the 60's and
70's, and the presence of the Anuc., etc.). It has made up the social base, the bulk of the combatants,and an important part of the leading cadres of the revolutionary guerrilla force which is active in
Colombia. In the present situation of economic migration to the cities, the massive displacements
caused by the reactionary violence of the armed forces and paramilitaries, and the impact of the
guerrilla war, important movements are taking place in various regions of the country, with their
own democratic demands, and some of these demonstrate a high level of militancy and of links with
the guerrilla movement. It is undeniable that the military offensive of the FARC and the ELN have
among their activists significant groups of peasants who are integrated with the guerrilla forces.
The foregoing facts, what is happening now and the tendencies which we can see developing allow
us to affirm that the countryside and peasants have a transcendental role to play in the revolution.
This has been understood by the CP of Colombia (ML), and as a result the Party has the benefit ofimportant organisational, political and military experiences in its work with the impoverished
country people of Colombia.
These phenomena demonstrate that in Colombia the proletariat needs to look for an alliance with
the poor and middle peasants, it must incorporate them actively in the revolutionary process, and it
must avoid allowing the peasantry to be manipulated by the bourgeoisie or won over by other
political sectors interested in the revolutionary struggle; this is particularly important if we take into
account the socialist direction of the revolution.
It is clear that we do not advocate an agrarian or peasant revolution in Colombia, however, we do
affirm the necessity of including the peasantry in the organisation of the social revolution.
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
24/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
24
III. On the necessity of using all forms of struggle: The social revolution of the proletariat requires
the utilisation of every forms of struggle. This axiom of Marxism-Leninism must be understood and
applied in relation to concrete conditions. Voluntarism in its application can lead us to subjective
interpretations, adventures or to reformist positions.
The revolutionary armed struggle is one form of struggle. According to the definition of Marxism,
war is the continuation of politics by other means.
For Marxist-Leninist communists the revolutionary armed struggle, independently of the forms
which it takes, is the only way to conquest power. All other forms of struggle, strikes and
mobilisations, elections, stoppages and demonstrations, are forms of struggle which enable us to
build our forces, however, by themselves they do not lead to power. On the contrary, they develop
within the confines of capitalist system and they serve naturally to subvert it, to undermine it and to
strike it in vulnerable places; they are also instruments of the revolutionary proletariat for the gain of
strength and of experience, to widen the social base of the revolution, but they do not allow us of
themselves to make an assault on power.
These problems, among others, indicate positions between revolutionary proletarians and reformists,
between communists and revisionists. This was one of the main pillars in the constitution of the
Marxist-Leninist parties. This continues to be the foundation stone which differentiates Marxist-
Leninists from revisionists and opportunists of every complexion.
The Colombian comrades, in the important debate which they are undertaking, touch on this problem
in relation to the validity and relevance of the rural guerrilla struggle, as a form of armed
revolutionary struggle.
One of the special features of the Colombian revolution is the existence of guerrilla war for a period
of 50 years. Throughout this period, and alongside the guerrilla struggle, we have seen the activities,intermittently and in an uneven way, of many and varied groups: The revisionist party, petit
bourgeois revolutionary organisations, "politico-military organisations", Trotskyist groups,
anarchists, and the Marxist-Leninist party, all of these have been and are present, active, occupying
various grounds of struggle, increasing their forces, gaining experience, winning victories, and
suffering defeats. The Colombian revolutionary guerrilla movement has not been defeated either
politically or militarily, and it remains a reality which nobody can deny. Certainly, the guerrilla
movement has not conquered power in spite of its long development; this is a problem to be
resolved.
The rural guerrilla movement has undergone ebbs and flows; it has had moments of upsurge, and of
development, and it has also suffered significant defeats. In the present moment, the guerrillamovement threatens the government, and is one of the factors involved in the sharpening of the
general crisis affecting Colombia. Imperialism and the dominant classes have attempted by every
means to wipe out the revolutionary guerrilla movement. For many years, Colombia has existed in a
more or less permanent state of emergency and of an internal unrest; at various times, the order has
been given to make total war against subversion; the guerrilla movement has been infiltrated and the
government has achieved its partial subversion; the government has orchestrated processes of
pacification, of betrayal of guerrilla fighters, and of their co-option into social and political life.
None of these measures. nor all of them together, have achieved the objective of eliminating the
guerrilla forces or moving them from the social and political life of Colombia. At the moment it is
well known by public opinion in Colombia and elsewhere that there is taking place an important
military offensive on the part of the guerrilla forces. It is obvious that the guerrilla struggle has not
led to the seizure of power in Colombia. This is something which nobody can deny. However, this
does not mean that this is a form of revolutionary armed struggle which has lost its validity in the
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
25/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
25
process of preparing for the final assault on power. In our opinion, the problem before us is how to
utilise the guerrilla movement in the process of the accumulation of forces, how to combine the
various forms of struggle, how to involve the guerrilla forces in the social and political movement
developing in Colombia, and, more concretely, how to use the guerrilla forces and their struggle in
the preparation for popular armed insurrection.
We assume the correctness of the concerns and the analyses of the comrades on the limitations,difficulties and mistakes of the guerrilla forces and guerrilla struggle. We think as you do that they
have committed very serious political errors, that some guerrilla sectors have degenerated into
banditry, and even towards paramilitarism, that others have assumed the role of the "liberators" of
the masses, that they have used methods of retention and of taxation in an indiscriminate manner
affecting various social layers, including the popular masses; finally, a whole series of political and
military mistakes, even deviations. We believe that this practice has limited the growth of the
guerrilla movement, and above all, its connection with the popular movement of city and
countryside. It is evident, even outside Colombia, that the guerrilla movement which has concrete
political projects and proposals, is disconnected to the major popular movements which, with their
own demands and policies, are developing within the cities, because the popular masses do not haveany political reference point with the guerrilla struggle. These are the problems and these are limits
of the guerrilla forces. For ourselves, we think it is necessary to emphasise perspectives and
tendencies; we must analyse limits and errors in order to overcome and correct them.
Up to a point, it is logical and dialectical that things should be thus. Nobody should believe that the
guerrilla movement is going to convert itself into the political vanguard of the workers and popular
movement. This has not occurred in any country of the world or on any occasion. The guerrilla
forces and the guerrilla army are a form of organisation and of action of the revolutionary armed
struggle which respond to a military and political conception of an organisation or party.
For revolutionary proletarians, the guerrilla movement is a form of military organisation and theguerrilla struggle is a form of struggle which aims to wear out the bourgeois army, to demoralise it,
to inflict blows on it; which allows the building of political and military forces, which in conjunction
with higher and more generalised forms of the revolutionary armed struggle and of the political
action of the masses can bring down the bourgeois government. By itself the guerrilla forces are
unable to generate an insurrection movement of the masses. In a moment we will clarify this
problem when we focus on the debate around thesis and practice. Meanwhile to claim that the rural
guerrilla forces, including those organised and directed by the party of the proletariat, can convert
itself into the main instrument for the conquest of power and because it has not done so, that this
undermines the validity of the revolutionary struggle, this does not correspond to serious analysis.
It is not up to us and we do not have sufficient information to analyse the causes and events whichled to the setbacks and difficulties, which at the moment, are affecting the EPL. However, we feel
obliged to make known clearly our point of view on this. Has the leadership of the party done
everything in its power to give politics and Marxist-Leninist convictions to those combatants and
leaders? Have we educated communist workers on these positions? How much responsibility do we
ourselves hold for the ideological and moral breakdown of certain combatants and leaders? Were we
always on time and right in our characterisation of the political military situation? How much did we
have illusions in the perspective of the EPL? Finally, this concerns on our part questions which we
must ask and which we believe require a response which can only come from the CP of Colombia
(M-L) and the EPL.
It is up to communists to resolve our problems, face our difficulties, and overcome our errors. Thistask is not going to be undertaken by the bourgeoisie nor by the petit bourgeois revolutionaries.
More specifically, it is up to the Colombian communists to take on the responsibility of confronting
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
26/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
26
and resolving the problems of the Colombian revolution. It is up to the communists of other
countries, and the Marxist-Leninists of Ecuador, also to direct ourselves towards these problems, that
is why we feel obliged to express our opinion and make suggestions which we consider valid. The
Colombian Marxist-Leninists are free to accept or reject these points of view, but in any case they
have a duty to examine them. We permitted ourselves in a conversation with the comrades of the
national leadership of the CP of Colombia (M-L) to express these opinions which we now repeat,
about what to do and how to do it in relation to the EPL.
At this time we said that we recognise the heroic tradition of struggle of the EPL, that we were
certain that it held an important position in the revolutionary struggle taking place in Colombia, that
it openly expressed the politics of the proletariat, and that because of this it has conquered an
important position among the guerrilla forces. We emphasised that none of the blows, the setbacks,
and problems that have taken place have destroyed the revolutionary nature of the EPL; that
certainly they have signified great difficulties and losses, but they have not in any way destroyed the
EPL. Let us remember, within the limitations of our knowledge, that in the past the EPL has
overcome perhaps even greater difficulties and has raised itself again, like the phoenix, to continue
the struggle and that, we are sure, it will again do the same on this occasion. We insist that the EPLwas, apart from being the armed wing of the CPC (M-L), one of the shock brigades of the
International Communist Movement Marxist-Leninist.
We demonstrated also the need to pay attention to its difficulties to examine them with the comrades
of first rank with the aim of empowering them politically and militarily. We emphasised that it was
not right or suitable to change the name. It seemed us very right to make every effort to bring the
revolutionary armed struggle to the popular masses who live, work and struggle in the cities, and we
believed that the rural guerrilla forces and more concretely the EPL could play an outstanding role in
these aims; that the existence and development of other expressions of the popular armed forces and
the EPL were not incompatible, but that on the contrary they complemented each other.
We agreed with the comrades in the necessity of taking great steps forward, of correcting the
mistakes, of opening new roads, of leaving behind blueprints, so that they are more in touch with the
actual problems of the revolution. The CP of Colombia (M-L) can be effective within the EPL and
can reach it directly with corrective measures. We are convinced that the sister party, in a supportive
role, and always within M-L, will know how to open up a new way and to go forward, and that it
will find in the Ecuadorian communists the alliance of class brothers.
Returning to the question of forms of struggle, we wish to insist on the necessity that communists
should be open to all known forms, and above all, sensitive to the expressions and forms used or
developed by the popular masses in the course of their struggle. What is important is to keep in mind
the problem of the conquest of power, since the various forms of struggle may or may not lead to it.By themselves the various forms of struggle, including the highest forms, cannot produce the final
objective of the seizure of power if there is not a political vanguard which combines and directs
them. In the ideological and political confrontation with the Krushchevite revisionists we come to an
important point, as to how the political movement of the masses can lead, raising its level to
revolutionary armed struggle. We, as Marxist-Leninist communists, affirm the importance of the
factor of the revolutionary theory, of political consciousness, and of how this cannot arise
spontaneously from the masses, even though these may be intensely and massively mobilised; since
the role of the party is indispensable. According to our point of view these arguments have not lost
their validity.
The organisation of popular insurrection does not have phases, stages, stages which have to followedin a systematic manner. The objective and subjective conditions can develop in some cases,
independently of our will or our work, but in this case insurrection does not follow a revolutionary
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
27/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
27
proletarian course, even if it happens always victorious. In our countries, in Colombia, Ecuador and
in many others, Marxist-Leninist communists have responsibilities to fulfil and have the possibility
and probability of sowing the right road to revolutionary struggle. Popular insurrection demands the
existence of its own military force, of a force which leads it, sustains and protects it. To organise
insurrection, we as revolutionary proletarians must make every effort to bring political movement to
the working masses, we must educate the people about the decision and the need for the seizure of
power, we must arm the masses with the desire to arm themselves, we must empower in foresightand in action the revolutionary violence of the masses, we must bring out the activity of the party, of
its cadres and leaders, we must expect to have our own military forces.
The organisation of the revolution demands from communists a permanent revolutionarisation. We
cannot give ourselves the luxury of sitting back of what is already established. Marxism-Leninism is
a guide to action, and we claim to be dialecticians, to be aware of the interrelationship of political,
social and economic phenomena, to be bold in our proposals, to open up new roads, to assume fully
that the revolution signifies changes and that these changes must also be produced in the
revolutionaries themselves, in their thoughts and in their actions. The new situations which are
taking place in our country require from us, in every moment, positions and activities which takethem into account. As communists we must do this, differentiating ourselves from those who are
defeated by pessimism; we affirm the validity of Marxism-Leninism and on this basis stands our
political and theoretical work.
These points of view make up the position of us, the Ecuadorian communists, in the important
debate taking place in the rank and file of the CP of Colombia (M-L). Certainly, all this does not
take into account the many-sided nature of the discussion, and without doubt, we lack complete
knowledge of the problems, and for this reason we do not consider these points to be definitive; we
are ready to continue discussing these and other problems on every occasion and in the conditions
that the revolutionary process permits.
For now, we will affirm again, as always, our position as class brothers, as comrades who wish to
work for revolution, within our own country and on international scale. We reaffirm our feeling of
revolutionary friendship with the CPC(ML), with the EPL, with the working class and the
Colombian people. We are convinced that the unity of our two parties and peoples will be
strengthened and that one day we will celebrate together the revolutionary proletarian victory.
CC of the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party of Ecuador
Ecuador, April 1997
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
28/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
28
FRANCE
The work of the party within the working class
The tasks of the communist party within the working class are essential. In order to deal with them
what is required is to determine the main currents that today's class struggle raises in our country. Atthe same time, we should not leave aside the fact that they are linked to the international events and
inversely. Doing so, we will thus be in best position to fix the frame of the main efforts that will lead
our communist party to be ideological and political headquarters of the working class. In other
words, that our party be able to work for the growing " awareness towards the irreductible opposition
of their (the labourers, ndlr) interests to the whole political and social order in existence, meaning the
social democrat consciousness"(1). The class struggle on which this "irreductible opposition" to the
capitalist imperialist system rises. Along the class struggle, and according to its importance and its
features, some workers stand out, who reach a certain level of consciousness of the fundamental
reactionary and oppressive nature of the capitalist imperialist system. We usually point them out as
"the most advanced members of the working class". But since 1995, we call them "the sections
ahead of the workers' and peoples' movement". Their number is more or less important. It dependson the development of the class struggle itself, but also on the level of the political and organising
abilities that the party gains along its experience (history).
Elements of the history of the labour movement before, during and after November and
December 1995
1981: Social democracy comes to power and manages capital's business in direct alliance (with the
help and complicity of the revisionists) with the French revisionist party (French Communist Party -
PCF) until 1984. This same year, the PCF ministers leave the government. Then social-democracy
leads capital's politics alone (with the support of the French Communist Party inside the Parliament).
1986-1990 and 1993-1995 (the two 'cohabitation') were two periods during which social democracy
had to deal with politics in the same way as the right wing. Before and after 1981, and with the
support of its allied section inside the working class, the PCF, social-democracy endeavoured to
maintain the ideological influence of reformism in the working masses and to lead them along its
trade-unionist and political frame. The first real protests against the domination of French social-
democracy finally took place in 1986. It happened when the SNCF rail workers wont on a long
standing strike. A series of protest movements inside important companies will stamp the years
following 1986. They happened also in whole sectors such as SNECMA, aeronautical construction;
RATP, metro, Air France; Peugeot; Alsthom, electro-mechanical construction; hospitals, etc. These
movements were mainly of an economic character. They have a trade-unionist origin (2). They have
not led and will surely not lead to a wide spread protest against government policy. They willrelatively remain isolated. Nevertheless, they ended up in stirring the sympathies of the other strata
of workers as both the former and the latter mentioned above call on one another, particularly when
it comes to demanding wage increases.
The opposition movement against the Gulf war will stand as the point of no return. Though limited
to some sections of the working class, this opposition pushed these sections, weeks long, out to the
street against war politics of French imperialism. Their slogan was : French troops, out of the Gulf:
The movement against the Gulf war, being mainly of a political nature, will lead the most conscious
labourers to a fundamental breaking off with Mitterrand and social-democracy. (These two proved to
be entirely submissive to the interests of French imperialism which drove them to imperialist war. -
revoir)
Then, during the November-December 1995 social movement, the class antagonisms of the French
capitalist society are brought back wide-open to the fore front. This movement corresponds in many
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
29/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
29
ways to Lenin's definition of class struggle. "The struggle waged by the workers turn into a class
struggle only when all the vanguard representatives of the working class as a whole in the country
develop the consciousness of belonging to the sole and same working class and start acting not only
against such and such boss but also against the entire class of capitalists and against the government
that backs it up. Only when each worker gets conscious of being a member of the working class as a
whole, when he considers that fighting daily for immediate claims against such bosses or such
official, accounts for fighting against the whole bourgeoisie and all the government. Only then, hisaction becomes class struggle" (3). The 1995 social movement put forward an important section of
advanced workers ("vanguard representatives of the working class in the country"), who stood at the
head of the country-wide strikes and street demonstrations that mobilised millions of men and
women week after week against government policies at the service of capital (4).
Before this important social movement, such workers, mostly employed in the public State sectors,
have been at the forefront of lengthy battles much for wage increases as opposed to the erosion of
their working conditions. For years, part of them have been pointed out as "rich" and "privileged" on
the pretence that their jobs are guaranteed. On the other hand, the weight and the ability of the
reformist unionist leaderships to keep the workers of these sectors in their union frame were strong.In spite of this massive strikes took the workers of these sectors in their union frame were strong. In
spite of this massive strikes took place apart from any order issued out of union headquarters. This
was already happening before December 1995. In other words, then, the workers at the head of these
movements were already gaining authority and some independent range of action with respect to
unions leadership.
During the months of November and December 1995, and though they had quasi-totally called
together for the strikes, the unions worried most about restricting the protests to the "particular
pension systems' and the State status in favour of the SNCF rail workers. That they wished to see
other sections enter the protest movement was but in support of this line thought.
It was significant to note that, while demonstrations were raging in December, the CGT was holding
its 45th Congress in its head offices at Montreuil, a suburban city next to Paris. Although millions of
people were marching in every city, the union leaders kept the delegates locked in to look into the
legitimacy of the renunciation of the reference to class struggle in the statutes of the unions!
During the preparatory events of the congress, numerous union activists rose their voices in defence
of the validity and the actuality of class struggle trade unionism. Through our unionist activists and
its organ, our party took part in this battle. And, instead of spending their precious time speaking on
class struggle at the congress, the great majority of the activists who take side for class struggle
chose to strike and demonstrate in the streets shoulder to shoulder with their comrades.
The movement widened mainly because these militants and other active strikers knew that the
previous strike experiences had not succeeded in pushing the State-boss and the private bosses
leaderships to retreat because of the lack of active solidarity.
This time, however, solidarity was able to stand out on the objective basis of common interests since
the "Juppe Plan" was, in a way or another, taking it out on all the workers. This solidarity was
proved through the slogan: Withdraw the "Juppe Plan"! As to the "All together" call, it was, beyond
the different situations, the uniting spontaneous expression of regained class consciousness. Through
their success in fixing the slogan "Withdraw the Juppe Plan!" to the movement, the most advanced
sections of the workers put, actually, the movement along a line in opposition to of the different
reformist organisations, be they trade unions or political organisations. The slogan itself was, at that
given time, the political expression of the resolute opposition of millions of workers to the policies
8/14/2019 Unity & Struggle No 05
30/75
UNITY & STRUGGLE AUGUST 1998
30
that the dominating class and its allies had decided for the preservation of their profits. It was this
advanced fringe which led those millions of demonstrators and bore this political slogan.
All these weeks of struggle against the government during which the working class played an
ascendant role, a large number of workers considered themselves as a whole society protest against
the capitalist system. And the current of solidarity developed by the workers and labourers of other
countries towards the movement reinforced the awakening of this consciousness.
The way the movement speeded up to reach its potency proves that its origins are way far in time. It
strengthens and amplifies the abilities of large sections of the working class and, in general, of the
peoples, to win their autonomy with respect to trade-union and political organisations lead by the
reformists and the revisionists. The advanced sections of workers felt reinforced in taking up actions
and initiatives during this movement. They developed their faith in millions of others. An important
breach opened up in the struggle against capital during the days of November and December. We
also witness the emergence of the break up with the politics practised for decades at the service of
the monopolies. Hence, (on verra apres) ... We leave this matter aside for the moment.
Acting with the advanced members of the working class
During all these weeks, our party, its members and sympathisers helped the movement to reach its
Top Related