Download - To Walk or Not to Walk

Transcript
Page 1: To Walk or Not to Walk

To Walk, or Not to Walk …2009 CNU Project for Transportation Reform (PTR) Summit Portland, Oregon

Richard A. Hall, P.E.

HPEHall Planning & Engineering, Inc.

Page 2: To Walk or Not to Walk

To walk, or not to walk: that is the question:Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer

Edwin Booth, Hamlet 1870Wikipedia

Page 3: To Walk or Not to Walk

the signs and arrows of outrageous proportion,

Page 4: To Walk or Not to Walk

Or to take arms against a sea of trucks,And by opposing slow them?

Page 5: To Walk or Not to Walk

To walk: To speed no more;

Page 6: To Walk or Not to Walk

and by a stroll to say we end

D. Burdin

Page 7: To Walk or Not to Walk

the heart-ache of a thousand annual deathsthat flesh is heir to;

Page 8: To Walk or Not to Walk

To walk, to stroll the street: perchance to dream ...

D. Burdin

Page 9: To Walk or Not to Walk

life before 30

Page 10: To Walk or Not to Walk

life after 30

Page 11: To Walk or Not to Walk

• economy• development projects must sell• Read Greyfields into Goldfields, CNU Lee Sobel• TND property values, 40 to 200% premium

• health• CDC, obesity epidemic• astounding highway fatality rate – 45k/year• safe walk to school

• environment – climate• it’s a crisis!• IPCC UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change• urban design influences VMT, thus a valid solution• what we can’t see can hurt us! 1 pound per mile, out window.

• etc.

Why Walk?

Page 12: To Walk or Not to Walk

CO2 Emissionsper Passengermile

Page 13: To Walk or Not to Walk

Drake’s Well – 150 years ago Titusville, Pennsylvania Edwin L. Drake & George Bissell struck oil, at 69 feet August 27/1859

Page 14: To Walk or Not to Walk

• drivable suburban– FAR = 0.2 – 0.4– vehicle mobility only by LOS - America’s default– extensive parking lots & wide roads– requires estimated 2/3 more energy than walkable urbanism

• walkable urban– FAR = 0.8 – 40.0– total mobility;

–walking, biking, transit, & vehicle use– urban form leads transportation design– often illegal today

from Option of Urbanism by Chris Leinberger:

tale of two cities

Page 15: To Walk or Not to Walk

Andrew Georgiadisdrivable suburban

Page 16: To Walk or Not to Walk

walkable urban Andrew Georgiadis

Page 17: To Walk or Not to Walk

It is not without hazard that change comes

Page 18: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 19: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 20: To Walk or Not to Walk

Top 10 Walkability Factors

• 10. Street Trees• 9. Lower Volumes• 8. Sidewalks• 7. Narrow Streets • 6. Interconnected

Streets

• 5. On Street Parking• 4. Lower Traffic Speeds• 3. Mixed Land Use• 2. Buildings Fronting

St. • 1. Small Block Size!

Page 21: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 22: To Walk or Not to Walk

Gaines Corridor Workshop

Page 23: To Walk or Not to Walk

Urban Transportation Design Question of the Century

• Q. Can you see DOT treating Gaines Street any differently than Capital Circle by the interstate?

• A. No.

Page 24: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 25: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 26: To Walk or Not to Walk

“The first step in the (thoroughfare) design process is to define the function that the facility is to serve.” AASHTO

Page 27: To Walk or Not to Walk

functional classification • Arterials - Connecting major areas, long trips for

mobility• Collectors - Connecting arterials, intermediate trips• Locals - Serving local access & connecting to

collectors, short trips

• All trips are by auto or truck, no pedestrians in the critical functional definition

• Areas = rural or urbanized, only two major areas• Add a third major area type – Compact Urban

Page 28: To Walk or Not to Walk

larger problem

arterial roadway designs differ only for rural & urbanized areas.

Again, too little regard for walking & compact urban context

Page 29: To Walk or Not to Walk

rural urbanized

Update the functional classification system areas

Page 30: To Walk or Not to Walk

rural

suburban

compact urban

Update the functional classification system areas

Page 31: To Walk or Not to Walk

rural

suburban

compact urban

new compact urban

Update the functional classification system areas

Page 32: To Walk or Not to Walk

• simulate urbanized travel from past travel patterns• apply expensive travel models of capacity• size network per vehicle LOS to prevent “failure”

• simulate urban form based on measured places • prioritize character and function over capacity• network is sized to yield smaller blocks

suburban

compact urban

what is the difference?

Page 33: To Walk or Not to Walk

land access

vehicle mobility

arterial

collector

local

land access

mobility for all modes

proportion of service by functional classificationgeneral urban compact urban

Page 34: To Walk or Not to Walk

vehicles all modes

trip length by functional classification

arterial

collector

local

general urban compact urban

Page 35: To Walk or Not to Walk

• continue valiant efforts to adjust suburban thoroughfares

• apply complete streets planning & design

• walking is first• set low speeds as 20 & 25• develop ped. scale design parameters • encourage multimodal travel via networks• decrease travel modeling and traffic impact analysis• reward good design behavior with higher funding levels

suburban

compact urban

what is the effect?

Page 36: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 37: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 38: To Walk or Not to Walk

The Transect – A Classification System

Page 39: To Walk or Not to Walk

18 mph

18 mph

Page 40: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 41: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 42: To Walk or Not to Walk

Roslyn, NYRoslyn, NY

Page 43: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 44: To Walk or Not to Walk

Roslyn, NYRoslyn, NY

Page 45: To Walk or Not to Walk

Congestion or Mobility

Page 46: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 47: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 48: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 49: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 50: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 51: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 52: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 53: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 54: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 55: To Walk or Not to Walk
Page 56: To Walk or Not to Walk

'tis a transformation devoutly to be wish'd.

D. Burdin

Page 57: To Walk or Not to Walk

To walk: To speed no more;