UNCLASSIFIED
AD NUMBER
AD915628
NEW LIMITATION CHANGE
TOApproved for public release, distributionunlimited
FROMDistribution authorized to U.S. Gov't.agencies only; Test and Evaluation; NOV1973. Other requests shall be referred toCommander, Army Armament Research andDevelopment Center, Attn: SMCAR-MSI.Dover, NJ 07801.
AUTHORITY
ARDEC ltr, 26 Jan 2010
THIS PAGE IS UNCLASSIFIED
COPY NO. ____
imr4 TECHNICAL REPORT 4588
SPIN-73
AN UPDATED VERSION OF THE SPINNER
COMPUTER PROGRAM
ROBERT H. WHYTE
NOVEMBER 1973
r
Distribution limited to U. S. Government agencies only (test and evaluation;November 1973). Other requests for this documcnt must be referred to PicatinnyArsenal, D'over, New jersey, Al 1N: .RF-Ib-T-S.
PICATINNY ARSENAL
DOVER, NEW JERSEY
The findings in tids report are not to be construedas an official Department of the Army position.
DISPOSITION
Destroy this report when no longer needed. Do notreturn to the o.rginator.
I a• • • "
Technical Report 4588
SPIN-73
AN UPDATFD VERSION OF THE SPINNERCOMPUTER PROGRAM
by
Robert H. Whyte
November 1973
AMCMS Code No. 554C.12.62000
Distribution limited to U.S. Covernment agencies only (testand evaluation; November 1973). Other requests for this document
must be referred to Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, New Jersey, ATTN:SARPA-TS-T-S.
Conducted for
Feltman Research LaboratoryPicatinny Arsenal
Dover, New Jersey 07801
I undei
Contract No. DAAA23-73-C-0033
by
Armament Systems Department
General Electric Co.Burlington, VT 05401
% -- --- ,
FOREWORD
Thi5 report documents tasks accomplished by the Armament Systems Department,
General Electric Company, Burlington, Vermont under United States Government
Contract No. DAAA21-73-C-0033 during the period from 14 August 1972 to 14 July
1973.
I P
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author wishes to acknowledge the personnel of the Free Flight
Branch of the Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen Proving Grounds;
the Aeroballistic Branch of Picatinny Arsenal; and the Aeroballistics Branch
(Range G) Arnold Engineering Development Center for their cooperation in
the collection and interpretation of data used in this study.
2
-4W9
ABSTRACT
The SPINNER computer program has been updated to compute aerodynamic
coefficients for a wide variety of spin stabilized projectile shapes.
Improvements over the original program are substantial as ogive radius,
meplat diameter and rotating band diameter are accounted for instead of
assuming mean values. Test cases are shown comparing the 1969 SPINNER,
the 1973 SPINNER and experimental data. Input instructions and sample pro-
gram outputs are given along with the 1973 program listing.
3
4,
TABLE OF CONTENTS Pg
Foreword .. ...........................
Acknowledgement. ............................ 2
Abstract .. ...........................
List of :ables .. ........................
List of Figures. .......................... 6
Nomenclature .. .........................
Introduction .. ........................... 9
Procedure .. ........................... 11
Empirical Equations .. ...................... 13
Results and Discussion. .. .................... 19
Conclusions and Recommendations .. ................ 21
References. .. .......................... 22
Appendix A Curve Fit Technique .. .............. 71
Appendix B Input - Output - Description. .. ......... 75
Appendix C Program Listing SPIN-73. .. ........... 78
Distribution List.... .. .. . .... . . . .. . .. . . . . . 87
4.4
LIST OF TABLES
Page
I Coefficient Probable Errors 28
2 SPIN-73 Output 20MM M56A3 29
3 SPIN-73 Output 20MM 5 CAL ANSR 32
4 SPIN-73 Output 20MM 7 CAL ANSR 35
5 SPI-73 Output 20MM 9 CAL ANSR 38
6 SPIN-73 Output 20MM 10 CAL CONE CYL. 41
7 SPIN-73 Output 90MM M71 44
8 SPIN-73 Output 105MM MI 47
9 SPIN-73 Output 105MM XM380E5 50
10 SPIN-73 Output 5/38 NAVY 53
11 SPIN-73 Output 5/54 NAVY 56
12 SPIN-73 Output 155MM MI01/107 59
13 SPIN-73 Output 15IM M549 62
14 SPIN-73 Output 175MM M437 65
15 SPIN-73 Outpu- 175MM SRC 68
5
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
1 Projectile Parameter Model 27
2 Aerodynamic Data 20MM M56A3 30
3 Aerodynamic Data 20MM 5 CAL. ANSR 33
4 Aerodynamic Data 20MM 7 CAL. ANSR 36
5 Aerodynamic Data 20MM 9 CAL. ANSR 39
6 Aerodynamic Data 20MM 10 CAL. CONE CYL. 42
7 Aerodynamic Data 90MM M71 45
8 Aerodynamic Data 105MM Mi 48
9 Aerodynamic Data 105MM XM380E5 51
10 Aerodynamic Data 5/38 NAVY 54
11 Aerodynamic Data 5/54 NAVY 57
12 Aerodynamic Data 155M M101/107 60
13 Aerodynamic Data 155MM M549 63
14 Aerodynamic Data 175MM M437 66
15 Aerodynamic Data 175MM SRC 69
6
NOMENCLATURE
2A projectile cross-sectional area, ft'
Cp spin deceleration coefficient, Mp/qAd(2v)
Cm pitching moment coefficient, M /qAdm m
Cm damping moment coefficient, Mm /qAd(qd/2V)q q
C TImagnus moment coefficient, Mn /qd(pd/2V)
p pC N normal force coefficient, FN/qA
C yp magnus force coefficient, Fyp/qA(pd/2V)
C X axial force coefficient, Fx/qA
CG center of gravity, calibers from nose
I axial moment of inertia, slug-ft2
Iy transverse moment of inertia, slug-ft2
FN normal force, lbs.
F yp magnus force, lbs.
F axial force, lbs.x
M spin damping moment
pMm pitching moment about CG
M damping moment about CGmq
M magnus moment about CGnp
V total velocity, ft/sec.
d projectile diameter, ft.
g gravity, 32.174 ft/sec2
m projectile mass, slugs
projectile spin rate, radians/second
q projectile pitch rate, radians/second
[7
NOMENCLATURE (Continued)
2 2q dynamic pressure, 1/2p V , lb/ft
3total angle of attack, radians
P air density, slugs/ft3
Subscripts
(X Derivative with respect to sin a
2-2 Derivative with respect to sin
2 X
3-a 3 Derivative with respect to sin a
5 -cx5 Derivative with respect to sin a
8
e'." A
INTRODUCTION
The Armament Department of General Electric under contract to Picatinny
Arsenal has developed an empirical computerized model for predicting the
aerodynamic coefficients of spin stabilized ,rojectiles. The code name of
the new program is SPIN-73.
The starting point for the current study was the computer program
SPINNFR 70 which was developed at Picatinny Aasenal during the period from
September 1966 to October 1968. This program was modified by General Electric
in 196968 and 197071 to update the predictions of the drag coefficient and
also to perform a closed form dispersion analsis.
In general the method used during the development of the original
Spinner was as follows-
Basic projectile configurations were selected which were considered by
Whyte 68,70 to have well determined aerodynamic coefficients. Empirical equa-
tions and constants were developed, by a trial and error process, by which
the standard coefficierts could be adjusted for changes in total length, nose
length, boattail t.ngth and center of gravity.
The following limitations were and are present in the original program.
1., Nose length 1.8 to 4.0 calibers
2. Projectile length 3.6 to 9.0 calibers
3. Boattail length 0.0 to 1.0 calibers
4. Meplot diameter, 0.10 to 0.15 calibers
5. Nose radius, secant +100% to secant -30%
6. Rotating band diameter, 3.025 calibers
* References alphabetically listed starting on page 22.
9
However as most projectiles in service and under investigation during
the period from 1966 to 196q in general fell within the above bounds the
limitations of the program were not considered very serious.
Since 1970 several programs have been initiated by the Army and Navy
which are considering utilizing projectiles with nose lengths of up to 5.5
calibers and boattail lengths of up to 2.5 calibers.
Also payload and fuzing capabilities of several small arms projectiles
currently under development by the Air Force, Navy, and Army have dictated
blunter ogives (large meplats) and near tangent ogives.
Rotating band diameter are also of larger scale on small arms than
corresponding shapes of large calibers thereby complicating the prediction
process.
Because of these known limitations and future requirements the need for
a revised SPINNER was indicated. Thus this current study was initiated in
August 1972.
Sears6 0 of Eglin in 1972 published a computerized curve fit technique
for predicting the drag of projectile. His results indicated improvement
over the original SPINNER in the area of tangent ogives and meplat bluntness.
A similar method to that used by Sears was employed in updating SPINNER.
In discussing the computer programs the 1969 version of SPINNER will be
referred to as SPIN-69 and the 1973 version as SPIN-73.
10
21 -
PROCEDURE
The most difficult task in the analysis of data is determining a
constant accurate model which will adequately curve fit data under all cir-
cumstances, whereupon predictions of results under a different sets of
initial conditions do not result in completely useless answers.
An example of useless results is shown in figure 15 where the pre-
dicted axial force is negative in the SPIN-69 program. When terms of
higher order polynomials are employed to obtain good fits one must be very
cautious when using these polynomials to extrapolate or even interpolate
data. These cautions are pointed out because SPIN-73 does employ higher
order polynomials.
The equations used for fitting and probable) errors i.i1 be covered for
each coefficient individually.
In general the data utilized with very fei exceptions was obtained
from reports published by the Ballistic Resea:ch Laboratory (BRL) and
Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC). No wind tunnel data was used
at all in the data bank. Wind tunnel data aas used to determine trends
and comparisons were made with the trends resulting data fitting.
The references utilized to collect the experimental data are listed
starting on page 22. Unpublished data from BRL, Picatinny, AEDC and GE
were also used. The method used to curve fit the data is described briefly
in Appendix A.
Equations of the following general form were used for all coefficients.
Definitions of VL, VN, VB, VCG, BD, DM, OR, and BOOM are found in figure 1.
11
-
Cx =a1 + a2 (CVN) + a3 (CVN2)
+ a 3 (CXCL) + a4 i'CXCL )
+ a5 (CVN • CXCL)
+ a6 (CVB) + a7 (CBD)
+ a 8 (CMK) + a 9 (CMK )
" a10 (CVN - CMK) + a1 1 (CXCL CMK)
" a 11(CRAT) + --- etc.
where:
CVN = VN - 2.5
CXCL = VL - VN - VB - 1.5
CVB = VB
CBD = BD - 1.02
CMK = CMK - 1.05
CRAT = VN /OR - 0.40
The combinations, variations, and parameters which can be included in
19-28the fitting equation are nearly infinite. References such as Dickenson,
60 66 43Sears, Watt, and Murphy were used as guides for determining the most
effective way of deriving an empirical equation. By the trial and error pro-
cess equations of the above type were manipulated into a form which adequately
described the experimental data.
12
EMPIRICAL EQUATIONS
This section will describe individually for each coefficient the equations
contained in the computer program SPIN-73 as of June 1973.
Axial Force Coefficient
CXCL =V. - VN - VB - 1.5
CBD =DB - 1.02
CDM =(DM - 0.12) 2 CRAT =VN 2/OR -0.40
if 0 < VN < 3.0 set VNX = VN , DXN = 0.0
if 0 < CXCL < 1.5 set CXCLL = CXCL .DXCL =0.0
if 0.2 < VB < 0.65 set VBX = VB - 0.2 DXBT =0.0
If VN, CXCL, or VB are greater than the maximum
set VNX = 3.0 , DXN =(VN - 3.0) A 1 3
CXCLL = 1.5 ,DXCL = (CXCL - 1.5) 0.01
VBX =0.45 ,DXBT = (VB - 0.65) A 1 0
If VB is less than the minimum
VBX = 0.0 ,DXBT = 0.0
C X aII (VNX - 2.5) + a3(VNx -Ia2 a 2.5) 2
+a 4 (VNx - 2.5) 3 + a 5(CXCLL+a (rXCLL) 2
+ a 7(VBX) +a 8 (CRAT) + a 9(CRAT)
+ a 1 1 (CED) + a12 (0DM) -(BOOM/1.36, 20.01
-DXBT -DXN + DXCL
13
The "IF" statements are required to circumvent the need for higher order
polynomials in the equations. In this manner only linear extrapolation and
interpolations are allowed on the fringes of the program capabilities. This
should prevent completely erroneous estimates.
Normal Force Coefficient Derivative, Pitching Moment Coefficient Derivativeand Normal Force Center of Pressure
if 0 < VN < 3.0 set VNX = VN , DNX = 0.0
A Bif 0 < VB < 1.0 set VBNP = VB , VBMP = VB , VBX = VB
where: Subsonic A = 1.0, B = 0.8
Supersonic A = 1.5, B = 1.0
if VN or VB are greater than the maximum
set VNX = 3.0 , DNX = VN - 3.0
0.5 0.5VBX = 1.0 ,VBNP = VB VBMP VB
Now set
CVNN = VNX - 2.47
CXLL = VL - VN - VB - 2.15
CDKM = DM - 0,17
CBBD = BD - 1.04
CCRT = VN2/OR - 0.48
VBTI = CVL/4.7
CNAB = B1 + B, (CVNN) + B (CXLL) + B4 (CCRT) + B (CVNN)2 + B6 (CXLL)I I.3 456
CNBT =B 7 (VBNP) + B 8 (VBX CVNN) + B 9 (VBX .CXLL)
CNAT = CNAB + CNBT
14
*1i
AMOMSQ = CNAB [C1 + C2 (CVNN) + C3 (CVNN)2
3+ C4 (CVNN) + C5 (CXLL) + C6 (CXLL)
2
3+ C7 (CXLL) + C8 (CCRT) + C9 (CCRT)
2
+ C10 (CDNI4) + C1 1 (CCRT - CYNN) + C1 7 (DNX)]
AMOMBT = VBTT [C] 2 (VBMP) + C 1 3 (VBX - CVNN)
+ C1 4 (VBX • CXLL) + C1 5 (VBX • CCRT)
+ C1 6 (VBX • CCRT • CVNN)]
CPN = (AMOMSQ + &MOMBT)/CNAT
CN = CNATa
CM = (VCG - CPN) CN
Yaw Axial Force Coefficient
CXCL = VL - VN - VB - 1.5
CRAT = VN 2/OR - 0.40
CVB = VB
CX D1 + D2 (CXCL) + D3 (CRAT) + D4 (CVB) - CNU
The Yaw Drag coefficient may be computed by adding Cx and CN.
2
15
.... ... . -
Magnus Force Coefficient Derivative, Magnus Moment Coefficient Derivative,Magnus Force Center of Pressure
CVL = VL
CVB = VB
CXCL =VL - VN - VB - 1.5
CVN =VN - 2.5
CYPA =E 1 (CVL) -0.1 (CVB)
at a .0
CNPAN =-E 1 (CVL)j [IE2 + 0.55 (GXCL) + 0.80 (CVN)]
+ CVB (CVL/4.7)
CPF = -CNPAN/CYPA
C =Px CYPA
Cn PD (VCG -CPF () C Y
at a 2.00
CNPAN -E I(CVL) [E3+ 0.55 (CXCL) + 0.80 (CVN)]
+ CVB (CVL/4.7)
CPF (2 -CNPAN/CYPA
C p CYPA
n a()= (VCG -CPF () C p
at a =5.0'
CNPAN' -E]I (CVL) [E 4 + 0.55 (CXCL) + 0.80 (CVN) + CVB (CVL/4.7)
CPF (5) =-CNPAN/cYrA
16
N-T
C =CYPAYpa
C =(VCG- CPF Cnl (5) YpciPc( 5)
Damping Moment Coefficient
CLL = VL - 5.0
CCG = VCG - 3.0
CVB = VB
Cm = -5.093 [F1 + F2 (CLL) + F 3 (CLL ) + F 4 (CCG)
+ F5 (CCG) (CLL) + F6 (CCG) (CLL 2 ) + F 7 (CCG) (CVB)
+ F8 (CVB)]
Spin Deceleration Coefficient
C = GI (VL/5.51)1
Stability Analysis
The methods used for stability computations were extracted from references
44 and 45. They are identical to those contained in the original SPINNER.
Gyroscopic Stability Factor, sg
s = 2 2p2/7 C d 3 V2
g x Yp mn
Dynamic Stability Factor, sd
2 (CN -CX + (ki- 2 /2) C )
d (CN -Cx-(k 2-2/2)Cm + (k 1-2/2)C )ci q p
17
Nutation, Precession Frequencies u1,2
Px (il+ )
-l,2 21Y
Nutation. Precession Yaw Damping Rates, X1, 2
pA [1C (1 t 1) + (i + /2 U 1 C1,2 4m [N (1 ± +( 2 /2) (1 q n pak1 /q Pct
where
-2 2k1- = md2/I
k2- 2 = md2/Iy
Cy = 1i - i/7s
The dispersion (DISP) is the radius in mils of a circle which a projectile
will impact in a vertical plane when disturbed to a first maximum yaw angle of
5 degrees or less. The basis for this calculation is derived in Reference 71.
The time step (DELT) shown will provide 20 integrations per nutation
cycle. This is entirely adequate for a 4th Order Range Kutta integrator.
18
$ 'j
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The results of several test cases are presented in Figures 2 thru 15.
Plotted are experimental points, SPIN-69 and SPIN-73 results. Tabulated
outputs of SPIN-73 are shown as tables 2 thru 15.
The following ranges of parameters are demonstrated by the test cases.
Total length 3.8 thru 10.0 calibers
Nose length 1.6 thru 5.5 calibers
Boattail length 0.0 thru 1.0 calibers
Ogive radius tangent thru conical
Meplat diameter 0.0 thru 0.26 calibers
Band diameter 1.00 thru 1.05 calibers
In general the coz relations between SPIN-73 and the experimental data
is very good with noticeable improvements over SPIN-69. Most of the effort
during this current study has been directed at the Axial Force and Pitching
Moment correlations as these two coefficients are by far the most accurately
determined during the experimental process. Mach work still remains to be
done on these coefficients in terms of defining a more adequate empirical
model.
The most poorly determined coefficients remain the Magnus and damping.
It is this author's opinion that the SPIN-73 improvement in these the cal-
culations is negligible. While some new data has been published since 1968,
in general data was previously available on similar shapes. For example
the projectiles refered to as the XM380 and XM549 were experimentally
i9
-n 1,
investigated long ago as the T388 and T387. This data was available in 1967
and had been included in the original (SPIN-69) program.
The bulk of the data published by AEDC through calendar year 1972 is
suspect as far as the Magnus and damping coefficient are concerned because
the effect on lineai theory reductions of a slowly varying pd/2V was not taken
into account.
This author also found in several instances as did Sears that the
geometric description of the projectiles under test were not available
either in the data reports or the data files.
The probable errors to the experimental data of the SPIN-73 empirical
equations are shown in Table 1. The number of data points used to compute
the probable rror is shown in parenthesis.
20
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The SPIN-73 program has been shown through test cases to be more accurate
than the SPLN-69 program.
The updating rcf SPIN-73 should be continued as new data is accumulated.
Records should be kept of shortcomings and extremely poor predictions.
Data should be more carefully reported with respect to actual configura-
tion tested.
21
p,
~- ' - - - ~-,-.- , r--~.~
REFERENCES
1. Ballistics Research Laboratories, Free Flight Aerodynamics Branch Firing
Records (Unpublished).
2. Boyer, E. A-rodynamics Characteristics for Small Yaws of 20mm Shell HEI,
T282E1 with Fuze M505 for Mach No. .36 to 2.78. BRL Memo Report 916,
August 1955. AD077515.
3. Boyer, E. Comparison of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of the 20mm HEI,
2282E1 Sheel with Fuze M505 and Fuze T821. BRL Technical Note 1055,
December 1955. AD084726.
4. Boyer, E. Aerodynamic Characteristics of 20mm Sheel. HEIT282EI. BRL MemoReport 813, July 1954. AD044114.
5. Boyer, E. Some Aerodynamic Properties of Three 105mm Shells, Ml, T377 andT107. BRL Memo Report 1144. April 1958, AD162924.
6. Boyer, E. Aerodynamic Properties of a 105mm Model of the 8 Inch T347E1.
BRL Memo Report 1212, June 1959. AD220559.
7. Boyer, E. Free Flight Range Test of a 10-Caliber Cone Cylinder. BRL Memo
Report 1258, April 1960. AD2373579.
8. Boyer, E. Comparison of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Live and Inert
70mm T231 Gun-Boosted Rockets. BRL Memo Report 1086, July 1957. AD144336.
9. Boyer, E. Aerodynamic Properties of the 90mm M-71 Shell. BRL Memo Report
1475, April 1963. AD411804.
10. Boyer, E. A Limited Aerodynamic Test of a 175mm Extended Range SubcaliberProjectile. BRL Memo Report 2160, March 1972.
11. Boyer, E. Comparison of Aerodynamic Characteristics of 20mm HEI Shell M97
with Fuze M75 and 20mm Shell T226E1. BRL Memo Report 865, April 1955.AD069009.
12. Brandon, F.J. Aerodynamic Properties of the 152mm XM617 Projectile. BRL
Memo Report 1998, July 1969. AD857512.
13. Brandon, F.J. Aerodynamic Characteristics of the 1522 Ammunition XM409E5,XM411E3, XM657E2 at Small Yaw. BRL Memo Report 2024, February 1970.
AD866b68.
14. Braun, W.F. Aerodynamic Data for Small Arms Projectiles. BRL Report No.
1630, January 1973.
15. Buford, Iv.E. Aerodynamics Characteristics of 20mm Shell T282EI. BRL Memo
Report 834, October 1954. AD064653.
22
ALA,.-
16. Buford, W.E. Aerodynamic Characteristics of the 30mm Shell T306EJ0. BRLTechnical Note 1019, July 1955. AD077533.
17. Carman, J.B. Wind Tunnel and Free Fligbt Range Tests of 3 and 5 CaliberAN Spinner Projectile with Rotation Bands. AEDC-TR-71-119, June 1971.
18. Deitrick, R.E. Effect of a Hemispherical Base on the Aerodynamic Character-istics of Shell. BRL Memo Report 947, November 1955. AD095782.
19. Dickinson, E.R. The Zero-.Yaw Drag Coefficient for Projectile 8-Inch, HE,M106. BRL Memo Report 1681, September 1965. AD473562.
20. Dickinson, E.R. Some Aerodynamic Coefficients for Projectile 4.2 Inch:HE, M329AI. BRL Memo Report 1900, February 1968. AD8227762.
21. Dickinson, E.R. Stability Determination of the 152mm Heat/mp Shell XM409E4.BRL Technical Note 1404, May 1961. AD374985.
22. Dickinson, E.R. Stability Determination of the 152mm Heat-mp-T ShellXM409F5 Mod 2A. BRL Memo Report 1391, Feburary 1962. AD329235.
23. Dickinson, E.R. Zero-Yaw Drag Coefficient for Projectile 175mm HE M437.BRL Memo Report 1568, March 1964. AD443811.
24. Dickinson, E.R. Some Aerodynamic Effect of Varying the Body Length andHead Length of a Spinning Projectile. BRL Report 1664, July 1965. AD469897.
25. Dickinson, E.R. The Effect of Boattailing on the Drag Coefficient of Cone-Cylinder Projectile at Supersonic Velocity. BRL Memo Report 842, October1954. AD057769.
26. Dickinson, E.R. Some Aerodynamic Effects of Head Shape Variation at Mach 2.44.BRL Memo Report 838, October 1954. AD057748.
27. Dickinson, E.R. Some Aerodynamic Effects of Blunting a Projectile Nose.BRL Memo Report 1596, September 1964. AD451977.
28. Dickinson, E.R. The Zero Yaw Drag Coefficient for Projectile 155mm; AtomicXM454. BRL Memo Report 1757, June 1966. AD488057.
29. Donovan, W.F. Analysis of Free Flight Test of 107mm Mortar Projectile XM571RAP. BRL Memo Report 2013, October 1969. AD862137.
30. Donovan, W.F. Transonic Range Tests of 5 Inch/38 Rocket Assisted Projectile(Inert). BRL Memo Report 2071, November 1970. AD878280.
31. Donovan, W.F. Transonic Range Tests of 5 Tnch/54 Rocket Assisted Projectile(Inert). BRL Memo Report 2107, July 1971. AD730661.
23
-| , i / ' A 1 i-. ..
32. General Electric Company, Advance Munitions Development Burlington, Vermont,Aerodynamic Data Files (Unpublished).
33. Haseltine, W.R. Yawing Motion of 5'0 MK41 Projectile Studies By Means of
Yaw Sonde. NWCTP4779, August 1969. AD862065.
34. Hitchock, H.P. Aerodynamic Data for Spinning Projectiles. BRL Report 620,January 1952. AD800469.
35. Karpov, B.G. The Aerodynamic Properties of the 155mm Shell M101 from Free
Flight Range Tests of Full Scale and 1/12 Scale Model. BRL Memo Report 1582,June 1964. AD454925.
36. Karpov, B.G. Aerodynamic Characteristic of the 110mm HE, T194 Shell and itsModifications with Fuze M51A5. BRL Memo Report 1057, Februray 1957.
AD127627.
37. Karpov, B.G. The Effect of Various Boattail Shapes on Base Pressure and
Other Aerodynamic Characteristics of a 7-Caliber Long Body of Revolutionat M=1.70. BRL Memo Report 1295, August 1965. AD474352.
38. Karpov, B.G. Aerodynamic Characteristic of the 175mm T203 Shell and the175mm Square Base Shell with Fuze M51A5. BRL MenLo Report 956, December 1955.
AD086528.
39. Krial, K.S. Aerodynamic Properties of a Family of Shells of Similar Shape;
105mm XM380E5, XM380E6, T388 and 155mm T387. BRL Memo Report 2023, February1970. AD866610.
40. MacAllister, L.C, A Compendium of Ballistic Properties of Projectiles ofPossible Interest in Small Arms, BRL Report 1532, February 1971.
41. MacAllister, L.C. Aerodynamic Properties of the 2.75 Inch Rocket T131.
BRL Memo Report 948, November 1955. AD085539.
42. MacAllister, L.C. The Aerodynamic Properties and Related Dispersion
Characteristics of a Hemispherical Base Shell, 90mm, HE, T191 with and
Without Tracer Element. BRL Memo Report, March 1956. AD094833.
43. Murphy, C.H. The Effect of Length on the Aerodynamic Characteristics ofBodies of Revolution in Supersonic Flight. BR! Report 876, August 1953.
AD021307.
44. Murphy, C.H. Free Flight Motion of Symmetric Missiles. BRL Report 1216,
July 1963, AD442757.
45. Nicolaides, J.D. Free Flight Dynamics, Univ. of Notre Dame 1968.
46. Odem, C.T. A Revised Drag Coefficient, KD Based on the 8 Inch HowitzerShell, HE M106. BRL Memo Report 1065, April 1957, AD132170.
24
47. Odem, C.T. Drag Coefficient of HE Shell for the New Series of Field ArtilleryWeapons. BRL Memo Report 1013, July 1956. AD105611.
48. Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, New Jersey, Aeroballistics Branch Files.49. Piddington, M.J. Ihe Aerodynamic Properties of a Caliber .223 Remington
Bullet Used in the M16 (ARI5) Rifle. BRL Memo Report 1758, June 1966.AD489960.
50. Piddington, M.J. Comparitive Evaluation of the 20mm Developmental Ammunition- Exterior Ballistics. BRL Memo Report 2193, May 1972.
51. Piddington, M.H. Deformation Characteristic of One Lot (LC SP412) of 5.56mmM-193 Ammunition. BRL Memo Report 2016, October 1969. AD862966.
52. Piddington, M.H. Some Aerodynamic Properties of a Low Velocity Projectilewith a Hemispherical Nose and L/D of 4.3. BRL Memo Report 1639, April 1965.AD47237].
53. Piddington, M.H. Aerodynamic Properties of a 20mm HE-T Projectile for VRFWS.BRL Memo Report 2000, July 1969. AD859054.
54. Piddington, M.H. Aerodynamic Characteristic of the 7.62mm NATO AmmunitionM-59, M-80, M-61, M-62. BRL Memo Report 1833. March 1967. AD815788.
55. Roecker, E. Large Yaw Firings of the 20mm HEI, T282E1 Shell with Fuze T196at Mach Number 2.3. BRL Memo Report 888, April 1955. AD068718.
56. Roecker, E. Aerodynamic Characteristics of 30mm HEI Shell T306 ElO. BRLMemo Report 1098, August 1957. AD152952.
57. Roecker, E. The Aerodynamic Properties of the 105mm HE Shell, M1 in Subsonicand Transonic Flight. BRL Memo Report 929, September 1955. AD078604.
58. Roschke, E.J. The Effect Nose Truncation on the Aerodynamic Properties ofthe 9 Caliber AN Spinner Rocket Near Sonic Velocity. BRL Technical Note 902,May 1954. AD061551.
59. Roschke, E.J. The Drag and Stability Properties of the Hemispherical BaseShell, 75mm, T50E2. BRL Memo Report 927, September 1955. AD079488.
60. Sears, E.S. An Empirical Method for Predicting Aerodynamic Coefficients forProjectiles - Drag Coefficient, AFATL-TR-72-173, August 1972.
61. Schmidt, I.E. The Dynamic Properties of Pure Cone and Cone Cylinders. BRLMemo Report 759, January 1954. AD030249.
62. Schmidt, L.E. The Aerodynamic Properties of the 7-Caliber Army-Navy SpinnerRocket in Transonic Flight. BRL Memo Report 775, March 1954. AD035840.
63. Schmidt, L.E. Aerodynamic Properties of 4.9 Calibers Long, Square BasedShell at Transonic Speeds. BRL Memo Report 824, August 1954. AD047993.
25
- . .'~ -
64. Scott, W.E. The Effect of a Rotating Band upon Some Aerodynamic Coefficientof the Seven Caliber AN Spinner Rocket at M=l.8. BRL Memo Report 1302,September 1960. AD246223.
65. Scott, W.E. Some Aerodynamic Properties of a 105mm Model of the 155mm T-358Shell. BRL Memo Report 1369, September 1961. AD267268.
66. Watt, R.M. Free Flight Range Tests of Blunted 4, 4.5, and 5 Caliber Bodiesof Revolution with Secant-Ogive, Tangent-Ogive, and Conical Nose Shapes.AEDC-TR-71-166, December 1971.
67. Watt, R.M. Free Flight Range Tests of an Improved 20mm Shell. AEDC-TR-70-289,January 1971.
68. Whyce, R.H. Spinner - A Computer Program for Predicting the AerodynamicCoefficient for Spin Stabilized Projectiles. General Electric TIS 69 APB3,August 1969.
69. Whyte, R.H. Effects of Boattail Angle of Aerodynamic Characteristics of175mm M437 Projectile at Supersonic Mach Numbers. PATM 1646, September 1965.
70. Whyte, R.H. Spinner - A Computer Program for Emperically Predicting theAerodynamic Coefficients of Spin Stabilized Projectiles, Picatinny ArsenalESL IR 319, February 1967.
71. Whyte, R.H. Dispersion of Projectiles as a Function of Physical and Aerody-namic Properties. General Electric, Burlington, Vermont, Advance MunitionReport, January 1970.
72. Winchenbach, G.L. Free Flight Range Tests of Basic and Boattail Configurationsof 3 and 5 Caliber and Spinner Projectiles. AEDC-TR-70-12. March 1970.
73. Winchenbach, G.L. Free Flight Range Test of the 20mm M56A2 Shell with aModiiied M505E3 Fuze. AEDC-TR-67-108, June 1967.
74. Wincnenbach, G.L. Free Flight Range Tests of the 20mm M56A2 Shell with theM505E3 Fuze. AEDC-TR-65-258, January 1966.
75. Winchenbach, G.L. Free Flight Range Tests of a 25mm Shell with the M505A3Fuze. AEDC-TR-71-62, April 1971.
26
w
0
ac.
o27
0, 0
0 i
.-.sO Q
o
(i u
OI c; -1 0 oc 03
0. LOcZ'- V)'6-'
j6 ~ ~ 1 Ci S Jj I40
1-28
. C C. 2 C c CD C C C. C C2 C C CD
4m4 f t.tf tf
-o M. C. 4
0L24C!
4
am
or-C
C C C C ~ 4LCCCCC C C C
20% .0
LO a
a. a5*~-1 .0 41.Xc 4 4 a4 4 4
, ~ ~ ~ d C, .a- p . . . . . . .
CCDC
rO GC C, C. 43 51
p . 0 40 Cp C 9.55 S.
*C C
! *2 3 C 9
- co-
.~~n i~NW.C
.8K -,.. *N NN ~~ 29
20MM ['56P3
x EXP£SPIN-69
&X & SPIN-73
CD
CD
Cx xCD a
cot
C",
03
-. :'')ED -
201M M1156P3
o x EXP£SF'N--639
0 P 'N-73
CD.
I
0C0 10 .5 .0 .5 .0 35CDC N
C 31
CD--.-
law 4. 1.0 000
- ~ ~ 4 41 W, aaaa.a -. Aaa a, d .-t d' I C ,:
ca 10. -. 0c 4
' C C. C
wa.
-. £-. t - W~ W - ----
:71 44f
4S daa aa
C3e l*=0 c
.'2 Cm :
4: CA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C nt.aE -4£C
0c
* ~32
20MM 5 CPL PNSR
x EXP£ PI1N-69
CD~ SPIN-73
D
C-)
C)
CD
acl;
C A
0rt
u 0
%50 I-00 1.,5o 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50MACH NO
33
ia"~ L
20MM 5 CFIL ANSR
o x EXP0 . SPIN-69
C4~ SPIN-73
a-=C0
c_
0D0:
0-v:0
:
u00x
0x
C)
0lo10 .02 0 ' 03 035
0RHN
03
.0 C!. ! a C! 1! 4!.-a'
4- 43 c-a. c. o
0 z k o -0 .0'
a a *. 10 42 0 acS a a Q a . I
um w16
0c .4
aaL.a . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A aso
SM: ~ ~ ~ W a- a- .4
a'. a as~4 a . 4 . ..
ace
0W.4c -.
C~~~ ... C C 'a 'a.aaa.' I ~ ' a
aI a l
-~~~9 a aa a. a - .. 'm
*535
20MM 7 CAIL INSiR
x EXFSSPIN-69
M SPIN-73
0X
:)
C?)
0l
0
a)
0:
ro
I I I
ThCD.0 1.0 20 .5 .0 35
IC)H N
C36
cr_ c:
20MM 7 CPL RNSP
ci x EXP*SPIN-69
C~0 SPIN-73
C.7£A Ac=
CL
0:C*uc
C:)0
cic:1:iW
ci
CD'
C)
CD
cix
&x
*0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2. 50 3'.00 3.50IIRCH NO
37
-- k
-J4A0 00 0 0 0 0
LUU
n, W I- C W .
LU . .
M, C
LU Ct- ta W oL rWd ,W rz ',-
-Cl, W fl.I
C-I
*4 "~ "4 W," T ""
LU U I)4)40. W% 0 P .0 GD In =0- O l N NW% nL O
0a- 4D
CLC
12 u0. LU 102 5C 1 n D
Lr -.. *, cccc.C- .Wx.I.
c - v Ur Q MMV IKP
1. ... - =o;
-~ ~ L. .5
4C, IV M W W D1er - cc, e ., mc1!a,
v Int
41 C ". C I C ~ C ~ I
C ui~.~i~-.~C CCCC OU0.
42v C, m C C. o
W0 C NCWr VOl 0 C a C 0C C mr Cup. n.:~ r-t C- UN t .
.4 U C I4) 0 N .. I~4t~. 0 1. ! -U .- C;
CC 0N. ?)P. 0~ 0 00
2O0MM 9 CPL RNSP
x EXPSSPIN-690SP'IN-73
C
C
CT )
C
'4)
M'.o 10 .0 2.0 25 .035
MPC:N
CD9
Z :- ,L- Cy-
20WM 9 CPL FRNSR
x EIXF£SPIN-69
cSPIN-73
CD
C\i
CCCD0L0c
u\
CD
CD
CD
C)
C)
C0
C)
CDC
-V Q
0&CDc
CD x x0;
CD
' 0.50 1 .00 1.50 2'.00 2'. 50 3'.00 3.50MRCII NO
40
. ..a. . .. . . . .
olc
C CC C OC C 4!CC
.: .... .. ... ..o .. .. .-a~~~ C a a -~ a a
a a C
Wa a
Z,€,
r C. c."4
U 40r ta a a
,.- C....... .....
_~ .C.+ .
4.,.'
,,,.-
" a . . .. 4; 0 % * N % n o ow
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .i,. ..,, . . .. I 1+ %I % 'k
- . . . . . .'. . . . . .
W 4,I,
- .& C
dap 4
to ..* .O
* A*. . . . . . . . . . .+ .....
ci Iw vC
: C a, 4 1.
~ .V '~* .~0 C41V
20NNM 10 CRL CONE CYL
SPIN-69SSPIN-73
Lx
CD
cn
cn
:z.-U~CV
ci
L)
'0b.50 1.00 1.50 2. '00 2'.50 3.00 3.-50MPCH NO
42
20MM 10 CFRL CONE CYL
x EXPcni SPIN-69
£SPIN-73
CD
a-
& &a
xq
0~
0~c
C)
0&
0D
CD
0,0 10 .02002s .035
MAHN
04
. 4p Z cp w C 4w w 41-
.- . .
31 -
ID0 .w l w 0 warVI
0~' 24P 4w~ %<~t 0 0 0 V -04
2 40
~~~~~ 0L 40 00 ~ s 0 0 e O ex- 41 -11 -. 14 .0 WO OE EO ES
a..7
90MM M71
x~ EXP*SPIN-69
S PIN-73
C3
CT)
c:mo
CD
'~J50 1' ,00 1'.50 2.00 2'.50 3.00 3,50
MARCH NO
45
* .- .e.
90MM M71
S5PIN-69J D 9PIN-73
)
C)
CD
a)CDj
CD
12 x
CD~CwCD
C)
C0-50 1.00 1,50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3,~50tIRCH NO
46
.- . .
;.3 z .
42,. c .I 0 4
.x . . . .- .
aa Case C*. -4m:
2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 41 - .* -1Q£ q
£00II
fta 0. -00 0 4p as *2
£4p
o. C-
z 40
-NO
. N5. * ... W W
~~~~e f4. ftW ft ftQfO ., N
-W w
-D4 a 0CD%
El zC .142
* so47
x EXrSPI1N-69
C) w SPIN-73
C)
cn
C &
Li
C=)
CD
CD
C)
C)
C)
C.)
LD
xEC:)
so1.0 ' 0 '0 2 03.035MC NO
48A
CD-
-69
SP9IN-73
o~ &
x
0~0p
C)
a
w -
c~ce,
0
C)
C0
0.s0 1.00 1.50 2.00 2'.50 3'.00 3.50MRCH NO
49
P7P 7- ANNNNNNNN.Q~ ~ 000 :30 :o000l t 00 0 40
N * * h *t U~tI tI SS 5
-. C
Z C. CDC. C o4
0mb W4000 C EYb~~
V, -)n Q t 1-.0 do4b. N .. ~ mto C ~ el v.CO V O m
C,
0=1 SD 0.cx0t
-11 % Mn sA
WO C LN I .PN W ~ W q q
s~c.~ NftN N Nft
.4!!6
00
4n W- 0 "W. onN .. W 04.n .. 0w%
C3 C)4 0C, - yf
W% P7Ici % C
C. !4!
- 4 ~OW4d ~ W 1Jq P N 4 4 I t
-. l M CV rN, fV ft ft
LL,0 3( . . .dO Pb.4 4:0. C3 Yb3 C3tN~ I n OON%= =N.5
0.7
3L. Uc r 7 W .W
>4.v" -W Z4
.4 M 53 UJ bN1~~lso
1051,M XM360E5SEXP
SPIN-69
c~j 0 SPIN-733
C-)
0
CA
0&
0&
cr I
o'0x
CDoL-:D~
c:)A
%.0 1.00 12 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50
MACH NO
51
1051L1 XV1380KBI5
C, ~ EXF
Pj ~; I t J-7:3
I- & *,t
CL-:x
CD
0.50 1100 1.50 2,:00 2.50 3.00 3'.50tIRtH NO
C> 0. a- 4w Vo.- . .
C, Z C, 1
2t a. 4
CL)
aec Cc
w a a a aaa
W ~ 0.0~'or .000 4 4 4 44.0
rI
51 43 4
4L4:1
i U)
aC .0 a a. c a a c C.
a.A a3m, m
-510~ ~~~ 554 .. . . . . .
ft C,40 4.2 v Ia5 r tAVrd0 c taPW)NW4SI%
CS'.Ir 0- MODa- .a2q.C E'V1~
ke. . . . . . .
55-, in0. I
.4 453
WM 1~ 15 WI p
5/38 NPVY(i x EXP
x SPIN-6yix~ 5PIN-73
&&
xx
<CD_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
C\)CD&
x&
51 1.00 1'.50 2'.00 2 50 .00 3.150
MfICH NO54
5/38 NFRVY
EIXPSPIN-6
SPI1N-73
n es
CD5C)
C D _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'05 .0 .0D0 2~0 308I1HNfl55
~~4~ Ast* afff AL 4L a ~
a-a-sw.
lot.
4 4 C d %d Os %j
~~ .ft. -~ we a. . . ..- . . . p. . . .
f t . ,."f
C a- C ft* ft~0 0 t a f t f t t ~ t
a- ~ -, MCW @ @ A-*ft-t l~fftwE.
'j I W ft.. a 4r a 4
'.a~ ... =1.- 0ftwf -bC a C @ @ .
00056
5/54 NFIVY
SEXP
S PIN-69
CDD SPIN73
CDA
-Di
u]e
507~ I'o150 2.00 2'.50 3100 3.-S0MRCH NO
57
5/54 NPVY
x EXPS 5PIN-69
C 5PIN-73
C-
C:5025
I
,I0.50 2 .0] 1.,50 .,0 20 .50 3.0 0 3'.50
MI-CH NO58
a a aa *
-t ' - v a0-a 475-D 0C D4* MC Q4 b4,,
&. 4QI4*
3~ ~ ~ ~ i or - 40.a aa aa- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o m~ o' w.C.a' ~ yy v y
4C i
*~~~ . . . . .,aa .aan a i a
-~: G~f 0 Is r. -t ... 0e-
J~~ T 4-:
malo " -01 0.0",~S
.
*5 -r - r, -. . . W. I . a
A 4L IL c m a. qv a 40SS 9 dr aL4,
ma a-a a~a. w 00.04 4D 44p 44-mv 5 - * 9Q o. d'. p.59
I-
S ~ ~ c at . .a.. 4 5a ' ' .e
-0 -09 ftwf D %W a t4if 0'. 4 9 cd.o t'
- 5'.-. wp - a h.f
w S. - oaft tf t4
ftf K a
* *
.1 Zo ~ C~ * .w-
* . - . ,. a.9
155MM M101/107
x EXP*SPIN-69
SSPIN-73
C-)CD&
cn
-4.
c::)
Fz
I I -Th5 COO 15 .0 .0 3.0 35
clR::)NC:60
CD~
155MM M101/107
CD x EXP£ P-'N-69
SP~IN-73~
CD
aa
CD
C &
C &CD
C;
£D]
CD
CDCD
0E
CD -
0.50 1.00 1.50 2. 00 2.:50 3.00 3.50MPCH'NO
61
- -a ---.
to f
CO ft N0 -t a tz .I 1,1 4 ftw * t
.. . . . .
4 .. .1 ~ 0 0 0 C 0 0 ~ o
PO 42,
I~~0 f 41RI .00I0000 0
S C L 0 4 * W:qf b W W O . .
IL -0 Cc e Da*.p m4el416 c ICC,
as. WIW WIW W 00 00062O
155MM M549x EIXP
SP9IN-69
CD~ 3PIN-73
C)&
C"A
C)
CDJ
CE
CDCD
CDCD
I'D
rn
CE'
CDI
Th50 LO0 1.5 .00 2.50 30 .5tIRCH NO
63
155MM M549
S PIN-69
SSPIN-73
&&
cr~0~-
&
C-)
C-D
0.50 1.00 1150 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50
64
ad, 0. m 4 )
. . . 4. N. . . -. . . 0 0 0 - C C '
Tt.. , ,a 3 I IC *! 1! O3
C. C. C.O C C CC C
ow Uw cl .lr u Ic q nwC~d' ia a *t = #a c i a S
.! C CC C CU ' cecc
w ~~c44CCCj% oOC Vo CC
'D C
w~~ a at ,, , wt a irSwm r
C c o: ZC C C z C C C CC, ~ ~ 11 o'-) o:NO Q,4 44 4 CCCoCCoCCCC COC
.~~ZZ .C . .C- . .. .. oO
a '-ca a a a a s l s
Zc. 0 . N0 - 0 C .. 0 C'*~~C M r% LuC..C 'N C
.44 -a,.--r-.tCe .- or
tr c cc4 0 C C' 4.% . a l - uw %ove
y ft tv v #3 w7 c at .. , M It *
. ~ C 03~ , one C.tJ 0 04444 - f N - j.0 mi 1o o mm. 4
v~f r! V,0N0C0C
e;) o4 C C
* . C CC CCC 11: C C 1- It C!V~ 1 4 4 W 1: C! C!m . f- if% - - - -.M
-NN6
U. (~4* ~ f( NN(~. N NN N 4% -- giO0 fi.CC 650.
I75MM M437
x EXP,SP IN-69
I NPI N-73
C.A4
( &
CD
'o 53 1.00 1,50 2..00 2.50 3.00 3.50MACH NO
6b
175MM M437
x EXP* SPIN-69
cdi D5PIN-73
,x x
c:)
CL
&CD
CD
c,
CD
CZ)
C'D
C3 c- x- -
0-50 1-00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50
M1RCH NO
67
~ 0 I A
C, I co 4% m ft V2
ra~aa am 4% 43 4LS 4L 12 S
c 0
Z - -.- - - - - - - -.....-
d s,
up~ ON a 9% In. I40 02 CD-WC ~ ~44 W
2 L dW 4 . E . 4E . . t. o d
- C-
K v.
-010 f-. 414l d rOW .- 4W O
.,4.C 444"0 -
I -t- .w..a -.... . C. . . -o
- .2-
kA44. S-- o1 04C W d) C 0 0 d% W
,~ 68
I c ft v nc
- - -- - - - -4 -
41. -I
* CC.
a' -- I %cC mC
z- c
- ~ ~ ~ C Al4' f4 4 4W . g%
.4 .. .
a.~~~~ ~~ c- cr -4 . . 44 l
1 4 44~ - 0.400444- .4.4 .44,P-) W,44
- - -N. ''.N68.
I 175MM~ S R0n
x EXP. SPIN-69
0 D SPIN-73
AA
C)-
C:)A
0y &
CD A A
xx
xx
C)
C)]
UDA
dcaC? ~ A, UAl C)
= I -
'b. so 1 .00 1 .50 2. 00 2 .50 3'.00 3.50MRCH- NO
69
175MM SRC
Cj x EXPCD I-69
SSPIN-73
A
C-)
(CD
2C)
C)
C-) &
C)C)
C)D
CD
CD
0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.0 .5MRCH NO
70
APPENDIX A\
CURVE FIT TECHNIQUE
171
CURVE FIT TECHNIQUE
The method used to perform least squares fits to the experimental
data using the empirical equations was a GE Time Sharing computer program
code name LSQMM. This program was utilized with the GE415 computer at
the Armament Systems Department. The brief description starting or the
next page of this program was extracted from the following reference.
Numerical Analysis Routines #807231A
Information Service DepartmentGeneral Electric CompanyBethesda, Maryland
Issued August 1968 (Revised Feb. 1969)
7
72
LSQMM'Iii', i outint dt-terines the coefficients A Q,JI-I,2, .. N of the function
F (I), , fA ? 1,2 A Q I =1,2 .. M
which detormines the hi-,t .ippiotximation of the fun'-tion V (I) in either the weighted leastsquares sense or the muli-max sense.
UsageThe c..ling sequence for this coutine is:
CALL LSQMM(PI'i \,A,HW,M,N,NT,NS,AM,IDIMM,IDIMN)
where,
*PHI is the N(, imensionial array, PHI(MN, N),. of coordinate funcklons which are sup-pliedj 1)% thl( 'jL,. The kth column~j of PHI contains the kth coordinate function evalua-a* ed at each (f the data points (i.e., - PHI(I~k , I - 1, 2, . .~ ., M).
*Y is the one dimnisiondi array, Y(M), containing the dependent variables.*A i, the one diniersional irra%, A()The A array cwi A i's thit ( efficient s A(J) of the function F(I).
*RW is the nane, "4, an arra containting the residuails R(! Y(I)- F(!), the weilhts W(I),and temporal ;tora-e to Lave the vertical weia-hts %hile doing the horizontal itera-tioiis. It should cioitain at least 3 *M locations.
*M IS thet numb11er of data points.*N i,, the number of coefficients, i.e., number o1 coordinate functions.*NT is the maximumin number of vertical iterations. For least Squares fit, NT = 1.*For least Squares fit and when there is no division of the data points in min-max.,
NS(l) =M. Otherwise, NS is the array containing the index values of the ends of thesections when Lusint', mmn-max fit,
*AM is a t~o chniensional arrav. AM(N,N , used internally to contain the n'atrix ofthe s\ st err of I IT'ar equations.IDIMMN i,, th'- first dim ense 'n of Pill, i.e., PHI1 IDIYIN N)'.IDININ .. the first dimension of AI, i.e., AM(IDIMN,N).
DiscussionM 1
If the user wishes to, minimize 1.1w [Yiix F '1 w 0, miodif\, the PHI and Y arrays
as follows:
0w JH(1 j.........)wPH(1N
PHI V2
L M'PM Pil FII-). .. .. .. .. ..... w \IPHI(M,;;N)
AL 2IY (3)
73
Sample Problem
Find the ,,eeond ifr orn pelvyonjial F A3 ,2 A2 , A , which htst fits the lolinwig datain the least squares where M 9,. N 3, ',.T- 1.
X 4., -3. -2. -1, 0., 1., 2.:, 3., 4.
Y - 2., -3., - b -7.:, -6-, -3., 2., 9., 18.
Solutiov is F X - 2X-6,
Sample Solution
NEWNET FILE NAME--EXAMPLEREADY
10 COMMON PHI(9,3).X(9),A(3),Rh(27)20 COMMON AM(3,3)PY(9)*YA(9).NS 1)30 DATA M#N.NTNS/93*I.9/40 INPUT,(X(I)#I=I.M)50 INPUT, (Y( I), Ia1,M)60 CALL PHII(M*N)70 CALL LSOMM(PHIY.A.RW,M,NNTNS.AM,9,3)80 DO 40 I=IM90 YA(I)-0.0100 DO 30 JaIN110 30 YA(I)=YA(I)¢A(J)*PHI(IJ)120 40 CONTINUE130 PRINT 100140 1O0 FORMAI(" X F(X) Y-F(X) A(N)150 l ".)
170 DO 50 I=IN180 50 PRINT 60,X(1),YA(I)PRW(I).A(I)190 60 FORMAT(4EI3.4)200 K=N+1210 DO 70 I=KM
220 70 IRINT 80,X(I),YA(I)PRW(I)230 80 FORMAT(3E13.4)240 STOP250 END260 SUBROUTINE PHII(MN)270 COMMON PHI(9#3),X(9)280 "30 10 I=lM
290 1O PHI(I,1)=1.0300 IF(N-2) 40,15,15310 15 DO 30 Ii.M
320 DO 20 J=2,N3302 0 PHI(IJ)=x(I)**(J-1"
340 30 CONTINUE!'0 40 RETURN.e ENZ
RUN
EXA4PI F
4 - J. , ,-, , - ). , . ';,3.,#4.3. - ,-6 .. ;. - ,-3. ?,2 , 9.a•18.
X F(X) Y-F(X) A(N)-0, "0F*- ,+'r, +n 0. -0.6000E+01-f t.f+1 Ju,. .k-+ 0. 0.2000E+0l-U.2000e 'ci .60001 .01 0. 0. IO00E+01-0. EIOO 01 - , t, 0.0. -0, 6000E+0I 0.
0.IQOOE.O1 -O.3000E+Oi A.
03DOOE0i I q. 9000LOi 0.0.0 0, _'01 0. 0IROOE 2 0.
74
APPENDIX B
INPUT-OUTPUT DESCRIPTION
75
Z-. - -
INPUT-OUTPUT DESCRIPTION
PROGRAM NAME - SPIN-73
CODING DATE - July 1973
PURPOSE - Predict the aerodynamic coefficients of spin stabilized
projectiles at Mach numbers for 0.0 to 5.0.
Inputs to the program are the projectile physical dimensions,projectile mass properties, gun bore diame-er and twist, andthe local air temperature.
INPUTS
Card No. 1 (See Note D)
IBM CARD COL VARIABLE
1 - 7 VL Projectile length - calibers
8 - 14 VN Ogive length - calibers15 - 21 VB Boattail length - calibers22 - 28 VCG Center of gravity - calibers for nose29 - 35 DM Diameter Me'Plat - calibers36 - 42 BD B Rotating band diameter - calibers43 - 49 ORB Ogive radius - calibers
50 - 56 BOOM Boom length - caliber5
57 - 80 NTiTLE Descriptor
Card No. 2 (See Note C)
1 - 7 DIA Projectile diameter - inches
8 - 14 AX Axial inertia - inches lb-in2
15 - 21 TR Transverse inertia - inches lb-in2
22 - 28 WCT Prcjectile weight - lbs.29 - 35 TWIST Gun twist - cal/turn36 - 42 TFM1'P Air temperature - 'F
43 - 49 DGUN Gun bore diameter - inches50 - 56 NAUTO 0 Uses input dimensions
1 Automatic dimensions
A
BD set equal to 1.02 calibersDM set equal to 0.12 calibersOR set equal to 2 (-VN 2 ) (secant ogive)
BIf input as zero (0.0) these inputs are changed
BD set equal to 1.00 calibersOR set equal to secant ogiveDGUN set equal to DIA
CIt aero estimates are only requirementthis card should be left blank.rDRepeat cards I and 2 to stack cases
76
OUTPUTS
Line 1 - Organization designation
Linu 2 - Description of item being estimated
Line 3 - Title line - projectile dimensions
Line 4 - Projectile dimensions
Line 5 - Title line - projectile physical properties, gun properties
air temperature and density
Line 6 - Projectile physical properties, gun properties, air temperature
and density
Line 7 - 'Aerodynamic Coefficients'
Line 8 - Title line - Mach No., etc.
Line 9 - Cxo - Zero yaw axial force coefficient
CX2 - Yaw axial force coefficient per sin a
CNA - Normal force coefficient derivative per sin a
CMA - Pitching moment coefficient derivative per sin a
CPN - Normal force center of pressure - calibers for nose
CYP - Magnus force coefficient derivative per sin a
CNPA - Zero yaw Magnus moment coefficient derivative per Iin a
CNPA3 - Cubic Magnus moment coefficient derivative per sir, a5CNPA5 - Quintic Magnus moment coefficient derivative per sin a
CPF1 - Center of pressure of Magnus force at 10 yaw or less
calibers from nose
CPF5 - Center of pressure of Magnus force at 50 yaw, calibers
from nose
CNPA-5 - 50 - Secant slope of Magnus moment coefficientderivative (at 5" yaw) per sin a
Cmq - Damping moment coefficient
Clp - Spin deceleration coefficient
Line 10 'Stability Analysis'
GYRO Gyroscopic stability factor
SBAR Dynamic stability factor at 1° yaw
RECEP Dynamic reciprocal factor at 1' yaw
SBAR5 Dynamic stability factor at 5' yaw
RECIP5 Dynamic reciprocal factor at 5' yawSPIN Spin rate, radians/secondW1 Nutation frequency, radians/second
W2 Precession frequency, raaians/secondLI Nutation damping factor per foot @ 1' yaw
1,2 Precession damping factor per foot @ 1' yaw
LI-5 Nutation damping factor per foot @50 yaw-2-5 Precession damping factor per foot @ 5' yaw
DELT Integration tire step, seconds (20 per nutation)
DISP Dispersion factor per 50 first max yaw, mils
77
APPENDIX C
PROGRAN LISTING
SPIN-73
78
G. L000m L
CL -. C' 3N
N. v u 9t L r o 1I0. .4. N P N ~ 9C!% 0
f~~~~~c Nr. Qr 4 -.. 4- - C - .0
.4. 0. -, - . 'C K44 0PO 4 *10~'*9'. p..* C.'4 ~ .J ~' t-. .~ C C C )
NWCL3 9. ) . 0 4.0 4 . 0 .
At .~ a. t .-a z 9 . 4C.C. .P' W N C '9 4 ,044 IE 'C 4. . ~. NC '40C *C .A C N'C .4' .. 0
.I:Ct 4', -- tw -C K.. . . 9 .v w 43 ',N . . 9. . .. I WV . w~0 4, wN) .9 CD CY 0 4'.!
.IL Nm . CD.. - - 4.'. . 0 . 0 4 41). C )2'.. w ~ 9..- D t.4%0.= ..4 -C. I I' . 9% 4 CDp v. . a
i-...N- ft 0 C tV? Cc0'C CN .0 4 - NP .N
4.41 'IN" -- 4 i.n V wV9Cv w.N12 c ?-1 1A. 4 "3C W9 4-, 1. :40!C'.CP~~-.4.4.44~~0. .4l4NN 1.1 ..4 £0i' 40. 1!. .4 0 * .4. .
.. 4NNNN49~ ~~~~~~~ .C .... ..CN 4C C. *0C!*. c.4 4 0 9) .
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OL 10 . . .? .. .. .~ .. ' 0.4 0C '0. .4~. ~.r- M. r-4 NL .t4 .- *4 - C I . 9 *S 4 9 .C .. .. t
, -.. C . . .J 4 . .00 - .. .cr -MM..9
4?-9..4~~~;V N9 N MJ4 C X. . 9 2) - N O04 4.?
.c .I I I a
c.~~~~~ .). f V4C A. C .r.. C . c C t N ... d N.a-~ x-. t#1.'I * :- *r . ... c I.i 9. C .o19 C 0. N
* . N f ~ .- - %-% 949'. 9 '.5 '.0 9 % ..- N.' N P . 4 .44 em4.61 C, r-. C.' n rV C3p' VN. 9 ' .9 . 4 .~ 0.
V s.. .0. 1 t- p. 4j u . 4 . .'C
.9 .~~f N. A). -.. a *f4 -. 0 44 C ~ r .~4 ~~ M . 4 0790 ?
0.~~~~~ .S .4 0 ' . . .) . .' . . . .' .' ... jr J'.CCC W .wCIV .CC SC CISF)C WCN0CIS=CN..N. 'IVW CY".N0W W I
C N 4 ., O S A S C O ) v. . I 2 O 01 .0 "I) .) a'U% . W
m' ~~ P--IIAAC
A t C- .OO IIn It m on VIS. V 1 . C ) W N .I O I IC3 oI C4 ) PO dDl.O
*: w~ ,I 'N 'o -C'* 'C . . C I "0 ~ 4 N . ". W
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A cm I, II a-~.C I *.0 W% InCIC I'0 5 N '.0 . . 4 4
.41 .4020 PI) 401 C5 CNS n"4 Cp C;MS4 0:U
ITO IT.l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C If- C'9 OF) CI O C NC* l44. 0 IJ * , 10 NI SFO * OW '0- -~~CZ 4. LC9CI .- 0" . .CCNC ~0CI -14-NSI. , . . .: ,
C C PI))' 1. CO M1 9.IJ ftNN O CU0~ A .W' V9 4D 1 C 0 0 In
CC N c OC C C - e% I; Cc c. 0 05 W 0 .4 0 goI.1 C N II
41 tOO . z... FW~ . c9'W C A.1 ':C5FW M N *fl.FN00I:SN;.. .. ~ . ~ - . - c . .0 01 . F WN . "- ..C
.. 0*~~~~~~~~ I b10 4 . 5 1 0 .415.0 c00 I 0 I % O C ' I ( 1 9 0 0 . .
"IA~~~~~~~~ .C" .~4C " . F .9 ... ... -N* N. . 4*) . . .N
v4 n I J" 'r 4I V4 V% V") w c4 C v AC &. V.J C.C O 00 1 I I NI c 5, LC Io U%
I.~ CL. cc . l e.. .4 . I f%.0 00 10 V~ It V% 4 -Ce#I P
- 10A 4 ,I . C1A04 C 0 '.4 0 I 1 ) 1 N I 1 # (4I 1 9 A C N w
7-1 r-40. . C- C;* C2 10" 4WWN MP r3CCF # in C"IC C-l F)
4 V% NJ. C. 0 0, C M. t W C I, 001 .. I . F I II C I I*'4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P Vj V v V V It w9 V" .' F 4 -A . N " . ... .l 4.. . . .4 4 n
ZI c~"C I . L L C U"LP . C I. .7. W C. U U C CFWc.. -'4 d S W .n' ~ )0 ( ) * ) 0 W N" 04 ) 0 ? N ( ' ~ )
COnC
Fso
000
0.0
* p~.4 .44 *4 0
oCD
43, 0 V . IV
I0 W% m-I CD%
* C, i .tftMnm0C:~ ~ ~ C:1 1 .. .1
onO CD V)S a-a. N 0.0. .0 ., N44~ 7 .1! . V
-c IN
K~ ~ -N .G
00 C0 f r C , PC
.4 ~~I I c I- 4% 'I. fV sA PV. ... I I I I C. .4
I 1 00.5~C Cii L. V.
C4 .4
A.- on 0 p*, Ln %M W%. inC V. I0a 10
.04% .00 N4aN.44.0 0.0 VICIV.N P~MGN. . Lo
u0
0. CLtl x , 40.4 .
C 7r
ILX:
CZ 4I)
ft aL I -~ 24 4
vi - &n L.4 W2 -
V X ~ .4 C . .4 0
0 x ~ C: x - . ~ v 1.o
x x~ -. 5 CI-. - C
0. Xj * *r x~ - -
zzLJ4 1.. . l.N..~~~~. -13L. 4- L.r 4 -
4* .4 .* . 3.f U'4 4
C- z 4 cd Itr -C (r,1N: T.4 11n uJ N-C I -I I: :
zoou Z: -i~ . T- (). c'/ 0 .D0 0 ia ~ ~ ~ L Lc 131 ci 54 .0 0 - -
I CL1 on~- -W Z-. 0a i. 0-..
OLL4 ft4. U. I. U- 3c I. m 0
I~~~~~~O 4-A4. 41 w. .44 .f4 4 . .v- 1 C C - C Uo .Q C f-t~ 4'T ct * 0 . o . 13A Z: cW( 13ro rI
# 2 -4 " . zL . 3 " .4L .5t* t?%" 2NC,2 C 0 U- 7I - Z i 3 t:(*U .1 0 me~0 -i ' 00U0 - 4 . .nI v Wn.. 4 w .4 I. b% MS 41 4D 0'
cr c- U J L I- 1 =4 10 CD C., -. w l
w a .c U * N 4 00 10 .4 Ct4 11 .(V m4 m .CI CY mL N. - u W l . 4
'o- * ~ t. . 7 2 *. .4 ge e4- ., Go .mm .0.-L 4 .C4S 4L. w" 0. 04 lip A 0, 0- V. C*Cp4
'.-0. .f . 0' 3 . .I C N I 14 0. ~ -- -I
I 4~ I. . II -- * infi 40 .4f824 1
C C... , C .' c, a 4 N2 .0 93 k4
rl c m 4- r ' v- P- 4
40 "
01-9
z z -W Z- z z mz z z
CLC
a-C
It 42
D IIC
'ft ca W, 0
z 2 1. 31 .0 -oa ca 1I CC ft &-C m-
d% 04 C C, -j
a US x~ 11~ 1 L L11 uI
OD ,-, '0 ;.I Q in . . 9c'~ a~ - 4-a p : - ~ N,
c 4L C. u4l tzC j u ouu uQ D 0r 2. > 0= b
~~~- .4 rl so4 I 0 .w * ya a
.4. #'0 tU Z C4 N * . e V
"I I0 I" -c 'r c , .4 evr
C ~ ~UU -U *4. 040040 S ~a . -q v2 mj oU v~m w ong~ in ina %nm o'-u v o
.4 O
83 c
0 >L
00
z Sz
U. w
* z~z
_Nc z
CU w, -u N,00 6 x
z >4 C
*t CC -t I LI, C
- r- - L ; . a .
L, c, C L ZNu ll 4%N -N. io .J IfK !
IS C
"X C3.4 .9 26 '4 N .. J. L 7
0 40 n uS u. -> > u >l -- UL)N L u -. p
IV 10 C.4% 0 ev - Z ,
Cr m% S Cp 3 S' Z. COOmm em -v MLN o. Z 4 C U
IIC V 4 ~ NN4L i~.. * ZO C op5
-0 la: 10 41 11 acaca ccw 1
-~ z.ze w. Nr * .L%'W N.
a.1
*a 0Ur
u U u
V)- "~ L. U!
Ix a , r 0..0j 0- 4 .-
-M .4 Z; 2 *C I C > Q -z. I .4 , 1
A4 u P% U l K>> 4x1 7
I~ 1 r- a a- U.~. *NPL IL ux ' r i- . 11-,
*~~ .-. . : .-
a! L. re INaf n a " cr IX It '. I ..-0- 1 ! aLL2L. i
0 ;a 17 C a t I C) .j U. a. 0' w '2Cnu.4Cu 7l; u 5U L) .4.u t; u a. aS 4
UZC~~M IV M"; U 4V41-).* * C 4rvl mU M. I 5~ IN K.L
4 *. 4 .* - 4 4U *UU iN 85
C000 00 0 C.00 00 00 00C 4 0D 02 0 0 0
0 q W) onP "nIP v Wwwv d f 0 hi 0l 9 - 1, 0 .
C, (X a. L k Ca C C ~..aO C. CLa aa a. mm zm
* z
-A IL C & I
wh 0.a3
C C3 0* Q -* ~ ~ J X x** y
#I ULJ - 9
Li *4* M . SA-
,*?4x .5 5 i.-
44S LM u C C
cX aOO 4 c "
LIA t- w1 g
a. X5 n . IIa;. c
L, 2Z% j,-- 0- )LI l -C CIf,- *44 0C
p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 or : r06 o
I C Mr Vr N mz * r, r.4 r U'N, ftf n)l yv "
In10 44 -. .J*I -
4 .1>~~0 *i en
r ~ xs *4*4 * 6
" 45
DISTRIBUTION LIST
Commander Copy No.
U. S. Army Material CommandATTN: AMCRD-TP, Mr. J. Hughes 1
AMCRD- Dr. J. V. R. Kaufman 25001 Eisenhower Ave.Alexandria, VA 22304
CommanderBallistic Research LaboratoriesATTN: Dr. C. Murphey 3
Mr. L. MacAllister 4Mr. R. McCoy 5Technical Library 6
Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD 21005
CommanderU. S. Army Armaments CommandATTN: Mr. Brinkman 7
Dr. E. Haug 8Technical Library 9
Rock Island, IL 61202
CommanderU. S. Army Missile CommandATTN: Mr. R. A. Deep 10
Technical Library 11Huncsville, AL 35809
CommanderHarry Diamond LaboratoryATTN: Technical library 12Washington, DC 20438
CommanderU. S. Army Material CommandATTN: Deputy for Laboratories, AMCDL 13
Chief of Laboratory Operations, Mr. H. Kline, AMCDL 145001 Eisenhower Ave.Alexandria, VA 22304
DirectorU. S. Army Ballistic Mi3sile Defense Agency 15132C Wilson Blvd.Arlington, VA 22209
DirectorU. S. Army Advanced Material Concepts Agency 162461 Eisenhower Ave.Alexandria, VA 22314
87
CommanderU. S. Army Edgewood ArsenalATTN: Technical Library 17Edgewood Arsenal, MD 21010
CommanderU. S. Army Frankford ArsenalATTN: Mr. S. Hershman 18
Mr. C. Bateman 19Technical Library 20
Philadelphia, PA 19137
DirectorAdvanced Research Projects Agency 21Department of DefenseWashington, DC 20301
CommanderU. S. Naval Weapons CenterATTN: Dr. W. Haseltine 22
Technical Library 23Cnina Lake, CA 93555
CommanderU. S. Naval Weapons LaboratoryATTN: Dr. T. Clare -4
Mr. R. Whalen 2iDr. W. Kemper 26Mr. P. Daniels 27Mr. G. R. Bolick 28Technical Library 29
Dahlgren, VA 22448
CommanderU. S. Naval Ordnai-- LaboratoryATTN: Mr. S, Hast gs 30
Technical Library 31White Oak, Silver Spring, MD 20910
CommanderAir Force Armament LaboratoryATTN: Mr. F. Burgess 32
Mr. C. Butler 33Technical Library 34
Eglin Air Force Base, FL 32542
CommanderAir Force Weapons LaboratoryATTN: Technical Information Section 35Kirtlarsk Air Force Base, NH 87117
88
Co-ananderDefense Documentation Center
Cameron StationAlexandria, VA 22314 36-37
ConmmanderAir Provino Ground Center (PGTRI)ATTN: Technic,: Library 38
Mr. F. Burgess 39Mr. E. Sears 40
EglIn Air Force Base, FL 32542
CommanderU, S. Naval Weapons LaboratoryATTN: Mr. C. Wingo 41
Dr. W. Kemper 42Mr. J. Roman 43Mr. Moore 44
Dahlgren, VA 22314
General Electric CompanyAiTN: Armament Systems Department 45-50Burlington, VT 05401
CommanderFicatinny ArsenalATTN: STIB
Dr. E. Sharkoff 51-55Mr. S. Kravitz 56Mr. V. Lindner 57Mr. S. Wasserman 58Mr. J. Gregorits 59Mr. J. Dubin 60Mr. A. LoPresti 61Mr. .. Loeb 62Mr. D. -rtz 63-72Mr. R. Kline 73-77
Dover, NJ 07801
89
DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA -R & D(Se-.,,ty ,f rtle, bod) vt ab.1,4, I and indexing annotefion m.,,t b0e ntered wIhen the veI'roll report i. classified)
i oRj c,-A riN G AC 'VI TV (orporate alhot) Ide. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
JNCLASSIFIEDArmament S;Y:stems Department 2bGRUGeneral etro.r 0
3 RF ORT TITLE
Spin-73 An Tipdated Vers-on of theSpinner Computer Progran
4 OESCAPTIVE NOTES (Type otrepor'andfiRlu.,-' date.)
5 AUTHORISI (Firer nAme, middle initial, lgat name)
Robert H. Whi te
6 REPORT OA'0 74. TOTAL NO OF PAGS = 17b NO OF REFS
NOVEMBER_1973 89___________75______
4CONTRAC -OR CkNN NO 94 ORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUWBER(S)
DA.!AA21-73 -C-,033b. PROJLCT NO Technical Report 4588
AM1CMS code No. 554C.l2.62000_____ _____________
C. 99 OTHER REPORT NOMS (Any othrrnumbere that may be assignedtis report)
10 I.SRIBTIO STTEMNTDistribution limited to U.S., Government agenAies only (test andevaluation, November 19?3) . Other requests f:)r this doeument must LE, referred toPicatinny Arsenal,~ Dover, N.J. . ATTN 9APPA-TS--T-r,.
it SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE:S 12 *PONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY
Feitman Research LaboratoryPIctinny X rsenal
_____________ __________________ cver-, N.J, 0780113 ABSTRACT
The SPINNEI. corputer program has been updated to compute aerodynamiccoe-1ffcients tb'r a wide varict:, o-f spin stabil2zed projectile shapes.Improvemerts ovolt the original program are substantial as ogiveradius, met-iat. di:moe_r and rctating band diameter are account-' forinstead of assumru"q mear 'iia. Test cases are shown compar the1969 SPINNER, the _1973 .EPIN1,NER and experimental data. Input instruc-tions ard s-imple >rograim uuitputs are given along with the 1973 programnlisttnq.
3% 1% ~em 'S 01 96PLACIR. 00 I..I'. 147. I JAN4 64. WHICH IS
Security Clslfication
ONCLASS I FI EDSoicurity ClassificatIon
14 LINK A LINK 6 LINK CKEY WORD S
ROLE WT ROLE WT ROLE WT
Projectile
Spin StabilityComputer AnalysisDragPitching Moment
Magnus
Damping
SPINNER
i
UNCLASSI FIED.ewity claasifcation
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUS ARMY RESEARCH. DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMANDARMAMENT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING CENTER
PICATINNY. NEW JERSEY 07B06-5000
TECHNICAL REPORT DISTRIBUTION CHANGE
The distribution statement for the below technical paper is to be changed to I -
Approved for public release, unlimited.
Title: SPIN-73 an Updated Version of the SPINNER Computer Program
AD Number: AD0915628Report Date: November 01, 1973
(Signature) (date)
Robert E. Souders
Security SpecialistDPTMS 973-724-4058DSN 880-4058US Army Garrison, Picatinny Arsenal
Top Related