Languages
Pages
Legal
7/8/15
1
Teacher Leader Effectiveness (TLE) Update:
Carolyn Thompson, Director of Government Affairs & Dr. Robyn Miller, Deputy State Superintendent Oklahoma State Department of Education
[email protected]; [email protected] (405) 522-3520; (405) 521-3332
TLE Timeline • Requires full implementa5on of TLE by 2017-‐2018.
– Meaning employment decisions will be based on both qualita5ve and quan5ta5ve components in 2017-‐2018.
• For 2015-‐2016, con5nue with implementa5on of qualita5ve and con5nue to collect data for quan5ta5ve, as available.
• For 2016-‐2017, con5nue with implementa5on of qualita5ve and collect data for quan5ta5ve to include new measures adopted by TLE Commission/State Board. – Recommenda5ons by Dec. 1, 2015; State Board adopts by Feb. 1, 2016
7/8/15
2
Evaluation Composition • Each teacher and administrator will receive both a qualita've and
quan'ta've score, with no composite score. – S.B. 706 eliminates “other academic measurements” as a requirement for the
quan5ta5ve piece, and the corresponding percentages.
Qualita5ve 50%
Quan5ta5ve: SAG 35%
Quan5ta5ve: OAMs 15%
OLD MODEL
Qualita5ve 100%
NEW MODEL
Quan5ta5ve 100%
Quantitative Composition • 5-‐5er ranking system: (superior, highly effec5ve, effec5ve, needs improvement, ineffec5ve)
• Use standardized test data, as available. • State Board to adopt a list of reliable, research-‐based performance
measures for teachers in non-‐tested grades/subjects. • Local school boards will choose from the list. • Teachers with at least one tested grade/subject may have up to 50%
of quan5ta5ve based on measures from the list. – Teachers with no tested grades/subjects will have 100% of quan5ta5ve based
on measures from the list.
7/8/15
3
Quantitative Composition S.B. 706 gives districts flexibility in determining the make up of the quantitative piece for teachers with both tested and non-‐tested
grades/subjects. *These are just some of the op5ons.
Methods from List 50%
SAG (VAM) 50%
Scenario 1: At least 1 tested grade/subject
Methods from List 20%
SAG (VAM) 80%
Scenario 2: At least 1 tested grade/subject
Methods from List 100%
Scenario 3: No tested
grade/subject Methods from List 50%
SAG (VAM) 50%
Scenario 4: All tested
grades/subjects
Employment Decisions • Employment decisions will now be made with both components in
considera5on separately. – Career teachers and principals receiving “ineffec5ve” on both components for
2 consecu5ve years must be dismissed or not re-‐employed. – Career teachers and principals receiving “ineffec5ve” on either component for
2 consecu5ve years may be dismissed or not re-‐employed. – Career teachers receiving “needs improvement” on both components for 3
consecu5ve years must be dismissed or not re-‐employed. – Career teachers receiving “needs improvement” on either component for 3
consecu5ve years may be dismissed or not re-‐employed.
7/8/15
4
Employment Decisions – Career teachers not averaging at least “effec5ve” on both components over 5
years must be dismissed or not re-‐employed. – Career teachers not averaging at least “effec5ve” on either component over 5
years may be dismissed or not re-‐employed.
• Teachers receiving “needs improvement” or “ineffec5ve” on either component must have a comprehensive remedia5on plan and instruc5onal interven5on.
Other Considerations • Career teachers receiving “superior” or “highly effec5ve” on both
components may be evaluated every 2 years. • For teachers coming to a district from another district, or from
re5rement, evalua5ons may be based on qualita5ve components for the first year.
• Directs con5nued study by the State Board and the Commission, to produce a system that promotes reflecDon and professional growth.
7/8/15
5
Red Banner Book: http://www.ok.gov/sde/newsblog/2015-06-25/download-red-banner-2015-legislation
Current Activity • SREB (Southern Regional Educa5on Board) involvement
– Funding – State Convening – Oklahoma Team
• EngageOK Conference feedback – Superintendents – Principals – Teachers – TLE Commission Special Mee5ng
• Research and Implementa5on
Top Related