The High-Shear, Low-CAPE SHERB parameter and its evaluation
Keith D. SherburnDepartment of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences
North Carolina State University
Research to Operations Webinar
October 24, 2014
2
• Tuesday posters, 3:00-4:15pm (Sessions 5 & 6):– “Synoptic Influence on High Shear, Low CAPE Convective
Events”, Jessica R. King and M. D. Parker– “On the usage of composite parameters in High-Shear, Low-
CAPE environments”, Keith D. Sherburn and M. D. Parker
• Wednesday, 4:45pm (Session 12B):– “High-Shear, Low-CAPE environments: What we know and
where to go next”, Keith D. Sherburn and M. D. Parker
For those attending SLS…
3
• High-shear, low-CAPE (HSLC) environments: second “key subclass” of severe weather (Schneider et al. 2006)
• Over half of significant or violent tornadoes (EF2+) associated with HSLC
• Relatively high number of missed events and false alarms
• Few operational or modeling studies
Background
Typical Features• Cool
season/overnight• Strongly-forced• Low LCLs• Low-level instability• Low-level jet• QLCS or mini-
supercells• Spatially compact• Transient rotation• Little lightning
Credit Mike Strickler, WFO Raleigh
Clark (2009)Lane and Moore (2006)Davis and Parker (2014)
Sherburn and Parker (2014)
Credit Jason Davis
Supercell Mesocyclones (9 tor., 13 nontor.)
QLCS Mesovortices (17 tor., 12 nontor.)
Only vortices within 60 km of the radar
Statistically significant differences
No statistically significant differences
Differences mostly vanish aloft
Davis and Parker (2014)
Statistically significant differences
Davis and Parker (2014)
Supercell Reflectivity Signatures
Davis and Parker (2014)
QLCS Reflectivity Signatures
Davis and Parker (2014)
Credit Jason Davis
11
SHERB Parameter
12
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
NR NP UM EGL SP LMV SA
MaximumTrueSkillStatistic
Region
Craven-BrooksEHISHERBS3SHERBESTPSCPV
Maximum TSS of Composite Parameters by Geographic Region
13
SHERB Distributions
SHERBS3 Availability for Forecasters
• AWIPS-1 Volume Browser addition code & instructionshttps://collaborate.nws.noaa.gov/trac/nwsscp/wiki/AppsAwips/Sherb
(AWIPS-2 code under development)
• AWIPS-1 and AWIPS-2 GFE tool coding & instructionshttps://collaborate.nws.noaa.gov/trac/nwsscp/wiki/Gfe/Smarttools/Sherb
• Real-time SHERB plots from NC State Real-time RAP – http://storms.meas.ncsu.edu/users/mdparker/rapReal-time NAM – http://storms.meas.ncsu.edu/users/mdparker/namReal-time GFS – http://storms.meas.ncsu.edu/users/mdparker/gfs
• SPC SHERB mesoscale analysis plots Nationwide SHERBS3 – http://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/mesoanalysis/s19/sherb3/sherb3.gif Nationwide SHERBE – http://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/mesoanalysis/s19/sherbe/sherbe.gif
• SHERB is expected to be added to Bufkit in an upcoming release
How not to use the SHERB
• To forecast convection• Must be used with a confident forecast of convection• All data points used to develop the SHERB were associated with either
severe or non-severe convection• Therefore, cannot be used to forecast convection!
• Where convection is not expected
• Values potentially above guidance threshold where convection will not occur
• In isolation • Composite parameters (e.g., STP,
VGP) still exhibit skill, though potentially at lower values than in high-CAPE environments
Credit Jonathan Blaes
SHERB Feedback
• HSLC “One Stop Shop”• http://www.meas.ncsu.edu/mdparker/sherb/index.html
SHERB Optimization
• Continuing to test different formulations of the SHERB
• Statistical and observational tests
• New combinations of parameters
• Operational tests
• Davis and Parker (2014), “Radar Climatology of Tornadic and Non-Tornadic Vortices in High-Shear, Low-CAPE Environments in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern U.S.”
• Sherburn and Parker (2014), “Climatology and Ingredients of Significant Severe Convection in High Shear, Low CAPE Environments”
• Both in Weather and Forecasting (August 2014)
HSLC CSTAR Articles
19
• CSTAR Program
• NOAA Grant NA10NWS4680007
• AMS/NOAA NWS Graduate Fellowship
• AMS/NASA Earth Science Graduate Fellowship Program
• NSF Grant AGS-1156123
• WFO Collaborators
• Storm Prediction Center
Acknowledgements
20
• Clark, M. R., 2009: The southern England tornadoes of 30 December 2006. Atmos. Res., 93, 50-65.
• Dean, A. R., and R. S. Schneider, 2008: Forecast challenges at the NWS Storm Prediction Center relating to the frequency of favorable severe storm environments. Preprints, 24th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Savannah, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 9A.2.
• Dean, A. R., and R. S. Schneider, 2012: An examination of tornado environments, events, and impacts from 2003-2012. Preprints, 26th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Nashville, TN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P60.
• Lane, J. D., and P. D. Moore, 2006: Observations of a non-supercell tornadic thunderstorm from terminal Doppler weather radar. 23rd Conf. on Severe Local Storms, St. Louis, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P4.5.
• Schneider, R. S., A. R. Dean, S. J. Weiss, and P. D. Bothwell, 2006: Analysis of estimated environments for 2004 and 2005 severe convective storm reports. Preprints, 23rd Conf. on Severe Local Storms, St. Louis, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 3.5.
References
Contact Information
• Webinar Presenter – Keith Sherburn ([email protected])
• Principal Investigator– Dr. Matthew Parker ([email protected])
• NWS contributors– Jason Davis (BMX) [email protected]– Justin Lane (GSP) [email protected]– Jonathan Blaes (SOO RAH) [email protected]
Top Related