Integration to increase relevance and knowledge retention.
Short videos viewed in advance paired with engaging interactive in-class sessions.
32 Hours
Publicly available now to any school or learner.
VARYING CORE CURRICULAModular Flexible
Exportable Curriculum
Integration of Basic Science & Clinical Application
180 videos
Flipped Classroom Approach
Complete shared core pre-clinical curriculum is defined through collaboration. Students engage with basic science material when linked to clinical relevance. Collaborative partnerships with international institutions are established.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) project is a cross institutional collaboration on core content. The flipped classroom approach engages learners. Basic science and clinical application are integrated.
Core curriculum varies by medical school. Pedagogical approach is outdated. Basic science instruction is poorly integrated with clinical application.
The Problem The Possibilities
OUTDATED PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH
HIV MODULE 23HIV MODULE 23HIV MODULE 23
INTRODUCTORY MODULE 6INTRODUCTORY MODULE 6INTRODUCTORY MODULE 6HIV MODULE 23
INTRODUCTORY MODULE 6
INTRODUCTORY MODULE 6INTRODUCTORY MODULE 6MENENGITUS MPDULE
PLAY HEPATITUS B
MENENGITUS MPDULEHAV MODULE 18
INTRODUCTORY MODULE 6INTRODUCTORY MODULE 6INTRODUCTORY MODULE 6MENENGITUS MPDULE
MODULE 18
1. Infection, Immunity, & Inflammation (I3) at UCSF covers microbiology, immunology, and infectious disease as wellas public and international health issues. UCSF implemented 6 of 29 RWJF microbiology modules, whereas otherschools implemented the full 29 modules.
2. Body and Disease (B&D) course at Duke includes Microbiology as an integrated component within the course, and33% of this course is RWJF material.
3. University of Washington is currently undergoing comprehensive curricular reform, and thus, pre-RWJF data is notavailable.
STANFORDUW
RWJF
PRE-RWJFDUKE UCSF
1
2
34
5
Average Ratings of Courses
Average Ratings of Courses
3 2 1
HIV MODULE 23INTRODUCTORY MODULE 6
1. Students at UW took the exam in their first quarter of medical school. Students took the exam duringtheir second year at other schools.
2. Duke's exam included only 32 of the 60 items used at all other schools.National Step 1 Average represents scores of past USMLE test takers who encountered the same exactassessment items in a formal USMLE Step 1 testing environment. Individual schools scores represent resultsof the same assessment items taken in a course exam setting.
STANFORDUW DUKEUSCF0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
USMLE Exam Score Results
STEP 1
USMLE Exam Score Results
NATIONAL AVERAGE
21
The Creation of a Collaborative Microbiology and Infectious Disease Medical Student Course with Blended Learning
The Approach
Sharon F. Chen, MD, MSBrian Schwartz, MD
Manuel Amieva, MD, PhDPeter Chin-Hong, MD
Bryn Boslett, MDAndrew Alspaugh, MD
Andrew Nevins, MDPaul Pottinger, MD
John B. Lynch, MD, MPHMaya Adam, MD
J. Matthew Velkey, PhDJennifer Deitz, MA
Heeju Jang, PhDPauline Becker, MAAarti Porwal, MHSACharles Prober, MD
Poster Design by:Lauren Watley
William Bottini
Top Related