TES 211E_ PROJECT III
FALL 2020_monday& thursday_ assoc.prof.dr. özge cordan & res. assist. sıla burcu başarır
> course description and purpose
The Project III course provides the student with the ability to read, write, speak and listen effectively, ability to gather, assess, record, apply and comparatively evaluate relevant information within the coursework and design processes. Critical thinking - conceptualizing - interpreting - problem definition and problem solving are the main stages of the studio.
The main objective of the course is enabling the students to perceive, investigate, interpret, and analyze human - space - object (product) - environment relationships in the context of Nature and Culture, to gain creative problem solving skills and to gain the expertise in using the fundamental terminology of the profession. Students can develop design alternatives in relation with the natural, cultural and conceptual context and by taking into consideration the structural, material, construction parameters related to the scale of design through this course.
> studio milieu & projects descriptions
The aim of the studio is to design a comprehensive interior architectural project. Thus the students are
expected to address the design issues through experimenting, and pushing their abilities to assess,
select and integrate appropriate combinations of spatial elements, palettes of interiors, aesthetics and
building technologies into the design solutions. The students are expected to keep a written/visual log
of their design process in a project diary; where they keep their sketches, notes and ideas regarding
their projects. These project diaries will be included in the assessment process. The students are
expected to use various techniques (drawings, diagrams, collages, writing etc.) in representing his/her
ideas.
The project investigates ‘inhabiting’ and ‘interiority’ issues in very poetic natural and cultural context of Cappadocia. “Void”, as a metaphorical understanding of these relationship, is chosen as a driven design concept to explore the dialogue between culture and nature, urban and interior, inside and outside, program and envelope, sequence and boundary. “Void” can also be defined as a mediator for investigating design possibilities and doing research related to place and subject. It can also be defined to explore the potential of void for becoming space. In this sense, the students are expected to define the subject and scenario, and the potential user for the given space. The design proposals reinterpret the context while providing new design scenarios for users.
During the semester, other activities such as virtual field trips, seminars, juries are considered to support ongoing activities related to studio process. The participation to these activities are mandatory.
> methodology
The design research will be done by “situation analysis”, including an initial research to get data from literature review, interview and environmental walkthrough, survey analysis and so on, and presented through mapping, diagrams, drawings and conceptual study and physical / digital models. These methods will be carried out throughout the whole semester and will address ‘magnitudes, relationships and processes of interventions and space’ rather than defining ‘form’. Representations of physical space and form will be through rendered collages in mixed media (and software) rather than photo-realistic renders. Subsequently, the individual process can be supported by sketches, photos or movies, diagrams, charts or any graphic information that can influence the design methodology.
> evaluation criteria & expected learning outcomes
Evaluation criteria and expected learning outcomes are applicable for all projects.
Reflection of interdisciplinary learning and graphic representation: Integrating interdisciplinary learning and representation techniques into individual projects.
Situation analysis and group presentation about the site, proposals about the site, by using posters, mapping and diagramming, sketches, photographs and field notes.
Common Module (CM) / Common Seminars + Workshop
Common activities contain three seminars and a workshop, which are detailed below.
CM/S1: “Measurable” by Sevim Aslan
This seminar will offer students an insight to theory and practice of measuring, surveying, and
documenting in architecture. The students are expected to put into practice the gained insight in their
term projects where they deal with measure, scale, and representation.
CM/S2: “Immeasurable” by Aslıhan Şenel
This seminar will offer a critique of traditional mapping practices, which claim objectivity in knowledge of
place, and propose an alternative view towards producing multiple and subjective knowledge of a place
in architecture. The students are expected to put into practice the gained point of view in their term
projects where they deal with observation and representation.
CM/S3: “Video Making, Online Archive, and Visual Material” by Özge Çelikaslan
This seminar will be the start of the one-month video making workshop of our Common Module. It will
offer students’ knowledge and philosophy on video making as a critical and creative tool in documenting
and representing a place. The students are expected to put into practice the gained knowledge and
point of view through their collective video in the Common Module Workshop.
CM/W1: “Video Making as an Architectural Storytelling Tool”
This workshop will give students the opportunity to use the Internet as an open source in making a video,
work collectively across disciplines in order to understand and represent a place, and create a living
archive for further architectural studies. There will be experts to give students specific technical
knowledge and direct towards sufficient references and resources. The task will include each student to
bring together knowledge of a place gathered remotely and in situ, develop an architectural storytelling
technique and make a tripartite video produced by a group of students responding to each other.
Research
Preparation of a booklet about the site of the main project. Presentation and discussions on design, culture and nature.
Main Project
Group discussions and presentations about the site, seminars, proposing initial ideas and developing individual proposals/projects about the site.
Activities Quantity Effects of
Grading
ASSESSMENT
CRITERIA
COMMON MODULE
Outcome Submissions
1 % 10
MIDTERM EVALUATION
Jury Evaluations
3 % 50
FINAL EVALUATION
Final Submission
1 % 40
* Minimum requirements for final submission:
• Mapping and diagrams
• Technical drawings (plans, elevations, sections (in appropriate scales, which will be announced later)
• 3D expressions (different types of perspectives)
• Storyboards, transcripts, serial sections, models
• Panoramas
• Students may use additional materials.
• Digital versions will be uploaded to a drive folder (will be announced).
> studio attendance
• It is important that students attend the studio and actively participate in all the activities/discussions carried out/held during the course hours.
• 70% Attendance (Students are only allowed a maximum of 5 absences. The 6th absence will automatically cause the student to fail the course.)
• In case of justified absence (extended health issues) it is required an official declaration from an official entity (official doctor’s report or similar).
> grades
• AA (Excellent) _work is exceptional in exceeding the stated problem objectives and requirements and in showing solid evidence of creativity and/or insight; a high level of proficiency is evident; salient issues are clearly mastered.
• BA (Very Good) _work exceeds the minimum stated requirements of the problem and addresses the stated objectives well, shows evidence of creativity and/or insight, work shows that salient issues are understood well, reveals superior skills for this level of expectations.
• BB (Good) _work meets important objectives and requirements in the project statement; shows good evidence of creativity and/or insight, and respectably developed; evidence of understanding the salient issues, fine skills for this level of expectations.
• CB (Satisfactory) _work meets the essential objectives and requirements in the project statement; shows some evidence of creativity and/or insight, though not well developed; some evidence of understanding the salient issues, reveals suitable skills for this level of expectations.
• CC (Sufficient) _work meets the minimum objectives and requirements as specified in the problem statement; shows little or insignificant creativity or insight; little or trivial understanding prominent issues; work only reveals the minimum expectations required for this level or it is significantly incomplete.
• FF (Fail) _work meets failure to address the minimum objectives as specified in the project statement; substantially incomplete work; excessive absences from studio; failure to submit required course work; reveals the inability to perform conceptually and practically at the level of competency for this studio level.
> schedule
Week Date Module Studio Topic Method
week 1 October
19 Mo 22 Thu
P CM
Introduction to the studio CM/S1:“Measurable" Sevim Aslan
Site Survey:
Photos, Movies, Audios, Sketches, Charts, Diagrams Mapping, Drawings
week 2 October 26 Mo
P Seminar: “Negative Space”, Aslı Özbay Virtual Excursion to Cappadocia
Presentation
Photos, Movies, Audios, Sketches, Charts, Diagrams Mapping, Drawings
29 Thu
NATIONAL HOLIDAY
week 3 November 02 Mo 05 Thu
CM CM/S2: “Immeasurable” Aslıhan Şenel Reading WS
Presentation Situation Analysis
Poster Sketches + Charts, Diagrams + Tech drawings
week 4 November 09 Mo 12 Thu
P Studio Sketch& Narrative&Scenario
Layout Sketches + Charts, Diagrams + Tech drawings
week 5 November 16 Mo 19 Thu
P CM
Jury I
CM/S2: “Video Making, Online Archive, and Found Visual Material” Özge Çelikaslan
Presentation & Crit
Mapping+Sketches + Charts, Diagrams + Tech drawings+Conceptual Study+
week 6 November 23 Mo 26 Thu
P
Studio Pin-Up 1
Layout Presentation & Crit
Mapping+Sketches + Charts, Diagrams + Tech drawings+Conceptual Study+Physical7Digital Model
week 7 November December
30 Mo 03 Thu
P Studio Layout+3D Study model + Tech drawings + 3D
week 8 December 07 Mo 10 Thu
P Studio Layout+3D Study model + Tech drawings + 3D
week 9 December 14 Mo 17 Thu
P Studio Layout+3D Study model + Tech drawings + 3D
week 10
December 21 Mo 24 Thu
P CM
Jury II
CM/W1: “Video Making as an Architectural Storytelling Tool”
Presentation & Crit Presentation & Crit
Study model + Tech drawings + 3D Video making
week 11
December 28 Mo 31 Thu
P Studio
Layout+3D Study model + Tech drawings + 3D
week 12
January 04 Mo 07 Thu
P Studio Detail Design Study model + Tech drawings + 3D detail drawings
week 13
January 11 Mo 14 Thu
P Studio
Detail Design Detail drawings
week 14
January 18 Mo 21 Thu
P Jury III Studio
Presentation & Crit Detail Design
Study model + Tech drawings + 3D detail drawings
Final * Final Submission
NOTE: The Schedule prevails unless the instructor will inform otherwise. In case of alteration, this will be done both by verbally (during studio hours) and by writing (email and studio posted announcement). *It will be announced later…
> references
1. Aran, K. Barınaktan Öte; Anadolu Kır Yapıları, (2000) Tepe Mimarlık Kültürü Merkezi, Ankara.
2. Bachelard, G., (1961) La Poétique de l’espace, Presses Universitaires de France. (1996, Mekanın Poetikası, Kesit Yayınları)
3. Berger, J., (2013), Bento’nun Eskiz Defteri, Metis Yayınları.
4. Borges, J.L., (1999) Kum Kitabı, İletişim Yayınları 5. Borges, J.L., (2007) Ficciones: Hayaller ve Hikayeler, İletişim Yayınları. 6. Calvino, I., (2002) Görünmez Kentler, YKY
7. Günçe, K., İç Mimarlik Stüdyosunda Boşluk Üzerinden ‘İç’in Kurgulanma Deneyimi, İÇMEK Bildiriler
Kitabı, İKÜ, İstanbul, 88-101.
8. Harmanşah, Ö. (1997) Mekansal Hikayeler-Kentin Kalbine Bir Yürüyüş, Mimarlık Dergisi, 274:22-25
9. Lefebvre, H., (1991), Production of Space, çev: Donald Nicholson Smith, Blackwell. 10. Lefebvre, H.,(1996), "The Right to the City", in Kofman, Eleonore; Lebas, Elizabeth, Writings on
cities, Cambridge, Massachusetts Wiley-Blackwell. 11. Pallasmaa, J., (2011), Tenin Gözleri, YEM Yayın 12. Perec, G (2017) Mekan Feşmekan, Everest Yayınları. 13. Perrot, M (2013) Odaların Tarihi, YKY 14. Wagenfeld, M., 2011, The Porous-City: Atmospheric Conversations of the Urban I Interior, Urban
Interior Informal Explorations, Interventions and Occupations, Edited by Rochus Urban Hinkel, Spurbuchverlag, Germany.
15. Yürekli, H. & Yürekli, F. (2004) Mimarlık Bir Entelektüel Enerji Alanı, Yapı Yayın.
16. Whyte, W. (1979) Belgesel Film: ‘Social Life of Small Urban Spaces’, The Street Life Project, Municipal Art Society of New York.
17. Şamlıoğlu T. ve Kuloğlu N., (2011) Formdaki Boşluğu Tasarlama Sürecinde ‘Kavramlar’, 23. Uluslararası Yapı Yaşam Kongresi, Bursa, 189-197.
18. Şamlıoğlu, T. ve Kuloğlu, N., (2009) The Concept of Void as Spatial Eff ect, Livenarch IV, Proceedings Volume I, Vizyon Printing, Trabzon, 145–162.
Internet Sources
https://architizer.com/blog/inspiration/collections/lyon/ https://futurearchitectureplatform.org/projects/d2b51dec-11c0-41a7-9e8d-292674cc8160/ http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12618085/index.pdf
> project area
UÇHİSAR EVLERİ
ZEMİN KAT PLANI
Çizim: Özlem Ayan-Melike Uzer
Kesme taş ve moloz taş duvar kesiti
Kaya kesiti
Tarih: Şubat 2001
Kontrol: Feyza Cansever
Ölçek:1/200
PROJE:
MAL SAHİBİ:
577
599
600
581
592
621
620
581
618 619
603
604
605
376
576
KOMŞU ODA
KOMŞU ODA
KOMŞU ODA
578 PARSEL
KOMŞU PARSEL
KOMŞU PARSEL
579 PARSEL
KAYABASI SOKAK
V.D.: Beşiktaş V.N.: 7820057284
Acısu Sok. No. 8 / 2, 80680 Vişnezade, Beşiktaş / İst.
Tel.: 0. 212. 260 19 08 Fax: 0. 212. 260 60 86
Mimarlık, Peyzaj Mimarlığı, Restorasyon, San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti.
V.D.: Göztepe V.N.: 8430000881
Tel.: 0. 216. 449 02 48 Fax: 0. 216. 336 83 57
Gazimuhtarpaşa Sok. No. 20 / 4, Feneryolu / İst.
TEZYİNMİMARLIK, DEKORASYON, DANIŞMANLIK VE TİC. LTD. ŞTİ.
UÇHİSAR EVLERİ 1. AŞAMA
FİKİR PROJESİ
PAFTA . 02
BEZiRHANE EVi
576
376
605
604
603
619 618
581
620
621
592
581
600
599
577
PROJE:
Ölçek:1/200
Kaya kesiti
Kesme taş ve moloz taş duvar kesiti
1. KAT PLANI
UÇHİSAR EVLERİ
KOMŞU ODA
KOMŞU ODA
579 PARSEL
KOMŞU PARSEL
KOMŞU PARSEL
578 PARSEL
KOMŞU PARSEL
KAYABASI SOKAK
MİMARLIK, DEKORASYON, DANIŞMANLIK VE TİC. LTD. ŞTİ. TEZYİN
Gazimuhtarpaşa Sok. No. 20 / 4, Feneryolu / İst.
Tel.: 0. 216. 449 02 48 Fax: 0. 216. 336 83 57
V.D.: Göztepe V.N.: 8430000881
Mimarlık, Peyzaj Mimarlığı, Restorasyon, San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti.
Tel.: 0. 212. 260 19 08 Fax: 0. 212. 260 60 86
Acısu Sok. No. 8 / 2, 80680 Vişnezade, Beşiktaş / İst.
V.D.: Beşiktaş V.N.: 7820057284
MAL SAHİBİ:
Tarih: Şubat 2001
Kontrol: Feyza Cansever
Çizim: Özlem Ayan-Melike Uzer
FİKİR PROJESİ
UÇHİSAR EVLERİ 1. AŞAMA
PAFTA . 03
BEZiRHANE EVi
KOMŞU ODA
UÇHİSAR EVLERİ
Kesme taş ve moloz taş duvar kesiti
Kaya kesiti
Ölçek:1/200
PROJE:
577
599
600
581
592
621
620
581
618 619
603
604
605
376
576
579 PARSEL
KOMŞU PARSEL
KOMŞU PARSEL
578 PARSEL
KAYABASI SOKAK
Tarih: Şubat 2001
Kontrol: Feyza Cansever
Çizim: Özlem Ayan-Melike Uzer
MAL SAHİBİ:
V.D.: Beşiktaş V.N.: 7820057284
Acısu Sok. No. 8 / 2, 80680 Vişnezade, Beşiktaş / İst.
Tel.: 0. 212. 260 19 08 Fax: 0. 212. 260 60 86
Mimarlık, Peyzaj Mimarlığı, Restorasyon, San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti.
V.D.: Göztepe V.N.: 8430000881
Tel.: 0. 216. 449 02 48 Fax: 0. 216. 336 83 57
Gazimuhtarpaşa Sok. No. 20 / 4, Feneryolu / İst.
TEZYİNMİMARLIK, DEKORASYON, DANIŞMANLIK VE TİC. LTD. ŞTİ.
FİKİR PROJESİ
UÇHİSAR EVLERİ 1. AŞAMA
BEZiRHANE EVi
PAFTA . 04
KOMŞU ODA
2. KAT PLANI
59 m²
16.8 m²
DIŞ TERAS≈87 m²
17.25 m2
HOL31.5 m2
KÜÇÜK MAHZEN52 m2
MUTFAK geçiş ??
WC
ŞAPELÜST KAT PLANI ALT KAT PLANI
15.74 m²
100
253,26
243
223,06
316,83
156,49
65
65
286,48
96,02
73
24,91
93
286,31
38,79
23,52
29,98
SHAPEL: ALT KAT 132 m2 + ÜST KAT 112 m2 = 244 m2
Top Related