Download - Surface Aerator vs Triton Energy Saving

Prepared For : Completed By : Dileep.C

Attention : Email: [email protected]

AIRE-O2 Product Quantity

Oxygen Transfer

Efficiency

(kgO2/HP/hr)

Flow BOD in Kg O2 Req/hr HP RequiredPower Each

(kW)

Total Power

(kW)

TRITON 1 1.4 600 500 600 480.0 643 643.2 kW

Competitor

ProductQuantity

Oxygen Transfer

Efficiency

(kgO2/HP/hr)

Flow BOD in Kg O2 Req/hr HP RequiredPower Each

(kW)

Total Power

(kW)

Surface Aerators 1 1 600 500 600 600 804 804

804 kW

Estimated Local

Cost of Energy

(INR/kWhr)

Equipment

Operation

(hrs/day)

Equipment

Operation

(days/year)

6 24 365

Total Power

saving with

Triton

Annual Saving

(INR)

3 Year Saving

(INR)

5 Year Saving

(INR)

10 Year Saving

(INR)

160.8 kW 8451648 25354944 42258240 84516480

AIRE-O2 Triton AIRE-O2 Aspirator AIRE-O2 ACT System2

Results

NAME-KR Pulp & Paper

Project-Modification of Aeration System at ETP Date

K.R Pulp

Mr. Tyagi(DGM Environment)

Aeration Energy Savings Calculations

Input Data

5/9/2011

Quote Number

########

Aeration Industries International, Inc.4100 Peavey Road

Chaska, MN 55318 USA

www.aireo2.com

of 1

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.aireo2.com/products.php?pind=triton

http://www.aireo2.com/products.php?pind=aspirator

http://www.aireo2.com/index.php

http://www.aireo2.com/products.php?pind=act