STAR3
Parent Advisory Council
UPDATE 2013
Questions to Parents
Fact: More than 28% of children enter kindergarten more than 1 year below age level in language, literacy and numeracy skills.
1.If you were a teacher, how would you want to be judged?
A. Number of students who are proficient
B. Actual growth of student
Final Question
Fact: Incentive bonuses work in many industries. They have not been adequately tested in public schools.
3.Do you think bonuses based on more than state average growth would work for teachers?
A. Yes
B. No
Another Question…..
Fact: Growing students above the state average in core subjects is hard work but necessary to close gaps for individual students.
2.Would you be willing to experiment with giving bonuses to teachers who grow students more than the state average?
A. No
B. Yes
National Goal for STAR3The impact of a PBCS
STAR3 Support
8 schools with PBCS
7 schools with 1% bonus
Outcomes:
• Quality of SIP
• Quality of unit lesson plans
• Quality of teacher observations
• Achievement outcomes – measured primarily in terms of growth at multiple levels
• PLC outcomes
Notes on Growth
• Goal: Growth above the state average.
• Objective: Close performance gap between individual students and “typical”.
• Three levels:.5 SE for Classroom Level (Increasing bonus
up to 2.0 SE)1 SE for Grade Level 1 SE for Whole School Level
Bonus (Growth) Payout Summary2011-12 Growth
Total Number
Lowest Median Highest
Principal Bonus
7 1000 1500 2750
Teacher and TA Bonus
392 100 1000 8500
SAS Institute calculated growth measures.ITSB: Used as the Kindergarten – 2nd grade measure.Growth: .5 SE above state average.
Local EvaluationSupport for District Initiatives
RtI: Response to Instruction
PLC: Professional
Learning Communities
PDP: Targeted Professional Development
Quality Lesson Planning
Results to Date
• One year of implementation……
• 22 indicators in favor of the incentive schools (bonus schools)
• 2 indicators in favor of the non-incentive school
• 13 indicators are equal
We will keep you posted on the progress!!!!!!
Elementary EOGs: Percent Proficient
40
42
44
46
48
Reading Percent Proficient 4th and 5th Grade EOG: 2011-12
Series1 47.9 42.8
PBCS Non-PBCS66
68
70
72
74
Math Percent Proficient 4th and 5th Grade EOG: 2011-12
Series1 73.5 68.8
PBCS Non-PBCS
Elementary EOGs:Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 3 to Grade 4
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
Reading: % Proficient Growth from Grade 3 (2011) to Grade 4 (2012)
Series1 7.4 1.5
PBCS Non-PBCS-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Math: % Proficient Growth from Grade 3 (2011) to Grade 4 (2012)
Series1 0.9 -1.3
PBCS Non-PBCS
Elementary EOGs:Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 4 to Grade 5
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
Reading: % Proficient Growth from Grade 4 (2011) to Grade 5 (2012)
Series1 4.9 -5.4
PBCS Non-PBCS-8.0
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
Math: % Proficient Growth from Grade 4 (2011) to Grade 5 (2012)
Series1 -1.4 -7.1
PBCS Non-PBCS
Elementary: ITBSKindergarten Percentile Growth BOY to EOY
0
10
20
30
40
Growth in ITBS Percentile BOY to EOY
Series1 32.5 25.37
PBCS Non-PBCS
Note: No difference for 1st and 2nd grades.
Middle School EOGs: Percent Proficient
58
60
62
64
66
68
Middle School Math EOG: 2011-12
Series1 67.8 62.2
PBCS Non-PBCS0
20
40
60
Middle School Science EOG: 2011-12
Series1 51.4 39.3
PBCS Non-PBCS
Middle School EOGs:Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 6 to Grade 7
-15
-10
-5
0
Reading: Change in % Proficient from 6th grade (2011) to 7th grade (2012)
Series1 -12.8 -12.8
PBCS Non-PBCS-3
-2
-1
0
Math: Change in % Proficient from 6th grade (2011) to 7th grade (2012)
Series1 -2.45 -0.85
PBCS Non-PBCS
Middle School EOGs:Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 7 to Grade 8
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Reading: Change in % Proficient from 7th grade (2011) to 8th grade (2012)
Series1 3.25 -0.15
PBCS Non-PBCS0
5
10
Math: Change in % Proficient from 7th grade (2011) to 8th grade (2012)
Series1 8.9 2.65
PBCS Non-PBCS
Teacher ObservationsPBCS Schools Numerically Greater in 7 of 9 Standards
Teacher Efficacy Surveys
3.8
3.85
3.9
3.95
4
4.05
4.1
4.15
Fall Spring
Teacher Efficacy
PBCS
Non-PBCS
The change from BOY to EOY was
significant for the non-PBCS schools.
Growth Measures: Teacher Level
0
5
10
15
20
25
PBCS Non-PBCS
Whole-School Payout Qualification:
Average of at least 1 SE of
growth across all students.
Growth Measures: Grade Level
0
10
20
30
40
PBCS Non-PBCS
Grade-Level PayoutsQualification:
At least 1 SE of growth across all
students at a grade level.
PBCS: 15 of 42 grade levels
Non-PBCS: 4 of 42 grade levels
Growth Measures: Whole-School Level
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PBCS Non-PBCS
Teacher Level Payouts Qualification:
At least .5 SE of growth for
students in the classroom.
PBCS: 53 of 167 teachers
Non-PBCS: 34 of 155 teachers
Top Related