St. Louis Public SchoolsStudent Performance Update
December 2009
Dr. Cleopatra Figgures
Deputy Superintendent
Accountability
1
Key Performance IndicatorsKey Performance Indicators
Annual Performance Report (APR)◦ 14 performance indicators◦ Appeals and waivers
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) – MAP/EOC◦ Ways to make AYP◦ Schools that made AYP – meeting all three (3) targets◦ Schools that made AYP in one area or in the additional
indicator District and State AYP comparisons Graduation and Attendance Rates Acuity Assessment Data Next Steps
Annual Performance Report – APRAnnual Performance Report – APRAccreditation Status 2009Accreditation Status 2009
Standard Indicator Description 2008 2009
9.1*1 MAP Grades 3-5 Mathematics9.1*2 MAP Grades 3-5 Communication Arts Met9.1*3 MAP Grades 6-8 Mathematics9.1*4 MAP Grades 6-8 Communication Arts9.1*4 MAP Grades 9-11 Mathematics9.1*5 MAP Grades 9-11 Communication Arts
Bonus Achievement Improvement in the MAP Performance Index Met Met9.3 ACT
9.4*1 Advanced Courses Met Met9.4*2 Career Education Courses9.4*3 College Placement Met9.4*4 Career Education Placement Met9.5 Graduation Rate9.6 Attendance
4 3
Performance Accreditation LevelsAccreditation levels and reviews types are as follows:
Accreditation Status Provisional Unaccredited
Review Status Mini Review Full Waiver Limited Waiver Full Review Full Review
K-12 Districts 12+ Met 9 – 11 Met 6 – 8 Met 1 – 5 Met
Source: http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/dar/understandingyouraprNovember2009.pdf
Accredited
Total Standards Met
Adequate Yearly Progress – MAP/EOC 2009Adequate Yearly Progress – MAP/EOC 2009
School Name (2007-2008 School
Year)
2008 Communication
Arts Annual Proficiency Goal
2008 Mathematics
Annual Proficiency Goal
School Name (2007-2008 School Year)
2009 Communication
Arts Annual Proficiency Goal
2009 Mathematics
Annual Proficiency Goal
Froebel CI CI Clay S SHerzog Y Y Cote Brilliante G SCHodgen CI CI Dewey IS G SKennard Y Y Kennard Y YLaclede G G Lexington G GLexington G G Monroe S SCPeabody CI G Shepard S SCShenandoah CI CI
McKinley Classical Jr. Academy Y Y
McKinley Classical Jr. Academy Y Y
Cleveland NJROTC Y SCarnahan School of the Future N/A S
McKinley Classical Leadership Academy Y Y
Metro Y Y Metro Y YMiller Career Academy Y S
*Note: The requirement for MET is: 1) Attendance Rate is equal to or greater than 93% or show s any improvement from previous year, and
2) a school must have a graduation rate of at least 85% or demonstrate improvement from the prior year.
AYP Met Symbols:Y Annual Proficiency Target Met
CI Annual Proficiency Target Met with confidence interval
G Annual Proficiency Target Met using Growth
S Annual Proficiency Target Met Safe Harbor provision
SC Annual Proficiency Target Met using the confidence interval for Safe Harbor
Middle School(s)
Middle School(s)
Elementary Schools Elementary Schools
High/Small SchoolsHigh/Small Schools
Adequate Yearly Progress – MAP/EOC 2009Adequate Yearly Progress – MAP/EOC 2009(Schools Met Communication Arts / Mathematics)(Schools Met Communication Arts / Mathematics)
Grade SpanSchool Name
(2008-2009 School Year) Grade SpanSchool Name
(2008-2009 School Year)
Total Elementary Schools: 9 Total Elementary Schools: 12
Clay Adams
Cote Brilliante Clay
Dewey IS Cote Brilliante
Herzog Dewey IS
Kennard Ford
Lexington Gallaudet
Elias Michael (Gateway-Michael) Henry
Monroe Kennard
Shepard Lexington
Total Middle Schools: 2 Elias Michael (Gateway-Michael)
McKinley Classical Jr. Academy Monroe
Yeatman Shepard
Total High/Small Schools:9 Total Middle School(s): 1
Beaumont Middle School(s) McKinley Classical Jr. Academy
Carnahan School of the Future Total High/Small Schools:6
Cleveland NJROTC Cleveland NJROTC
Community Access Job Training (CAJT) Community Access Job Training (CAJT)
McKinley Classical Leadership Academy McKinley Classical Leadership Academy
Metro Metro
Miller Career Academy Miller Career Academy
Roosevelt 9th Grade Center Northwest Transportation & Law
Soldan International Studies
*Note: = Schools That Made AYP
Elementary Schools
Middle Schools
High/Small Schools
Total Number of Schools That Met Communication Arts Indicator: 20
Elementary Schools
High/Small Schools
Total Number of Schools That Met Mathematics Indicator: 19
Adequate Yearly Progress – MAP/EOC 2009Adequate Yearly Progress – MAP/EOC 2009(Schools Met Additional Indicator – Attendance/Graduation)(Schools Met Additional Indicator – Attendance/Graduation)
Grade Span
Total Elementary Schools:
Adams Laclede
Ashland Lexington
Baden Mallinckrodt
Buder Mann
Ames VPA Mason
Clay Meramec
Cole Monroe
Columbia Mullanphy
Cote Brilliante Oak Hill
Dewey IS Nance
Dunbar Peabody
Ford Scruggs
Froebel Shaw VPA
Gateway Shenandoah
Hamilton Shepard
Henry Sigel
Herzog Woerner
Hodgen Washington Montessori
Jefferson WoodwardKennard
Total Middle Schools:
Busch AAA McKinley Classical Jr. Academy
Bunche International Studies Langston
Carr Lane Long
Compton Drew ILC L'Ouverture
Fanning Stowe
Gateway Yeatman
Total High/Small Schools:Carnahan School of the Future Miller Career AcademyCleveland NJROTC Northwest Transportation & LawMcKinley Classical Leadership Academy Roosevelt 9th Grade CenterMetro
*Note: The additional indicator for elementary and middle schools is attendance rate. These schools must have an attendance rate of at least
93% or demonstrate improvement from the previous year. Graduation rate is the additional indicator for high schools. A school must
have a graduation rate of at least 85% or demonstrate improvement from the prior year. Source: Understanding Your AYP Report ,
Version 9 Updated August 11, 2009.
= Schools That Made AYP
Total Number of Schools That Met Additional Indicator: 58
Elementary Schools
High/Small Schools
School Name (2008-2009 School Year)
39
Middle Schools
12
7
District and State MAP Comparisons 2003-2009District and State MAP Comparisons 2003-2009
14.9 17.4 19.0 19.9 19.5 21.627.529.8 29.9 30.4
43.7 44.4 45.751.2
19.4 20.426.6
34.7
42.9
51.0
59.2
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
Stu
de
nts
Communication Arts - AYP
St. Louis Public Schools State of Missouri Communication Arts AYP TargetYear
12.716.7 16.9 17.4 17.2 17.6 19.621.3 22.9 24.7
43.3 44.9 46.7 47.6
9.3 10.3
17.5
26.6
35.8
45.0
54.1
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
Stu
de
nts Mathematics - AYP
St. Louis Public Schools State of Missouri Mathematics AYP TargetYear
Graduation and Attendance Rates 2004-2009Graduation and Attendance Rates 2004-2009
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
St. Louis District 89.4 89.0 88.7 88.7 88.6 90.3
State of Missouri 94.3 94.6 94.8 94.7 94.8 95.1
89.4 89.0 88.7 88.7 88.6 90.394.3 94.6 94.8 94.7 94.8 95.1
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
Percen
tage of
Studen
ts
Attendance Rates
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
St. Louis Public Schools 62.8% 61.1% 56.2% 55.8% 52.9% 45.7%
State of Missouri 85.6% 86.0% 85.8% 86.3% 85.8% 85.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
% of St
udents
Graduation Rates
Acuity and MAP Correlations – Spring 2009Acuity and MAP Correlations – Spring 2009
25% 25% 24% 23% 23% 23%27% 25% 25% 22% 22% 19%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
% S
cori
ng
in A
dva
nce
d &
Pro
fici
en
t
Grade
Communication Arts -Top Two Achievement Levels
(Advanced / Proficient)
2009 MAP Results Predictive C Results
21% 19% 17% 20% 20% 18%25%
20% 22% 24% 23%18%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
% o
f Sco
rin
g i
n A
dvan
ce
d &
Pro
ficie
nt
Grade
Mathematics -Top Two Achievement Levels
(Advanced / Proficient)
2009 MAP Results Predictive C Results
Targeted approaches for meeting accreditation standards:◦ Inclusion in Accountability Plan(s)◦ National Clearinghouse Survey Augmentation◦ Career Education Course and Placement monitoring
Focus on AYP targets – focus on academic growth:◦ Use of student and teacher performance data◦ Intervention Program Models, e.g., Turnaround, Pilot
Revisit to assessment benchmarks used:◦ Acuity◦ Schoolnet
Student Information Data Warehouse For:◦ Accountability Plan monitoring◦ MSIP (Accreditation) Scorecard◦ District and school scorecards for progress monitoring
Next StepsNext Steps
Top Related