1
SNOWPACK AND FRESHWATER ICE SENSING USING AUTOCORRELATION RADIOMETRY
A. W. (Tony) England, Hamid Nejati, and Amanda MimsUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A
IGARSS 2011
2
Outline
• Intro to global snowpack sensing
• Limitations of current snowpack sensing technologies
• Potential of Wideband Autocorrelation Radiometry (Wideband AR) for snowpack sensing
• Demonstrate concept through simulation
• Summary of Wideband AR’s advantages
• Wideband AR’s challenges
3
Intro to Global Snowpack Sensing
• Applications Weather prediction and climate monitoring Water resource management Flood hazard prediction
• Desired coverage Near-daily of all snow-covered terrains
including snowpacks on major ice sheets• Snowpack characteristics of interest
Thickness Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) Wetness Freeze/thaw state of underlying soil
Current Snowpack Sensing Technologies
• Combinations of 19 & 37 GHz brightness temperatures are used empirically to estimate snowpack SWE in simple terrains
• Combination of 10 & 17 GHz SAR is being developed as an empirical technique to estimate snowpack SWE in all terrains
• The physical basis for both of these microwave techniques is differential frequency dependent scattering guided by theory but ‘tuned’ empirically
Radiometry – scatter darkening induced negative spectral gradients
Radar – frequency dependent backscatter strength
4
5
Limitations of Empirical Algorithms
Because empirical algorithms are ‘tuned’ for an expected snowpack:
• Static algorithms fail:
When anomalous warm periods or diurnal melting causes metamorphic changes in snowpacks
Where there is sub-pixel snowpack variability, i.e., area averaging has limited utility where processes are nonlinear
• Dynamic algorithms:
Require a dynamic thermophysical snowpack model that follows the metamorphic evolution of the snowpack, and
Mechanisms to adjust algorithm for changes in snowpack grain size profiles from the thermophysical model
6
Wideband Autocorrelation Radiometry (Wideband AR):An Alternative Technique for Snowpack Sensing?
Downwelling Sky Radiance
AR Sensed Radiance
Snowpack
Upwelling SoilRadiance
DirectRay
RayDelayed
By τ0
Source = Upwelling Soil Radiance+ Downwelling Sky Radiance
Sensed Signal = Direct Ray+ Ray Delayed by τo
7
Things to Note
• Key is observing delayed autocorrelation peak at lag time τo
• If thickness, Δ, varies over the footprint of the radiometer, the effect will be to broaden the autocorrelation peak at lag time τo
• Wetness in the snowpack (< ~7 volume percent) will cause absorption and self emission
Absorption will reduce the height of the autocorrelation peak at τo
Self emission will not be observed because it will not correlate with the direct ray
Downwelling Sky Radiance
AR Sensed Radiance
Snowpack
Upwelling SoilRadiance
DirectRay
RayDelayed
By τ0
8
Necessary Conditions for Sensing a Dry Snowpack with Wideband AR
• Frequency, f, must be sufficiently low, and snowpack thickness, Δ, sufficiently thin that neither absorption (or emission) nor scattering will significantly modify rays transiting the snowpack Requirements generally met for f < 10 GHz and Δ < 2 m
• Interfaces at top and bottom of snowpack must be nearly parallel and quasi-specular at sensor’s frequency Requirement generally met for f < 10 GHz
• Dielectric transitions at top and bottom of snowpack must be distinct Requirement generally met for f < 10 GHz
• Correlation time of AR radiometer’s band-limited signal must be less than lag time of delayed autocorrelation peak, i.e., τc < τo
Consequence of failing this condition is illustrated on next slide
9
Example Whereτc > τo
Experiment: Freshwater Ice
Over Water• 1.4 GHz Tb Profile• 20 MHz bandwidth• 230 beamwidth• 100 m agl• Winds calm
Calibration flight during late fall, near Boulder, CO, England and Johnson, 1977
10
Note: Interference Patterns Are Not ReliablyDiagnostic of Snowpack Thickness
• Phase of ‘Delayed’ ray is modulo 2π for equivalent outcomes yielding uncertainties in thickness corresponding to 2πn phase differences of ‘Delayed’ ray (where n is an integer)
• Variations in thickness over the footprint of the radiometer will average the interference effects
• As snowpacks thicken, variations in thickness necessary to average the interference effects become smaller fractions of overall thickness
• For sufficiently thick snowpacks, fringe-washing leads to an incoherent average
11
Consider a Hypothetical <10 GHz Wideband AR Sensor
Antenna
LNA
Analog
BDF A/D Digital Processor
Analog Band Definition Filter (BDF) has ~1.5 GHz passband
A/D Downconversion,A/D converter has
bandwidth >10 GHz and sampling rate of >3 Gsamples/s, i.e., >Nyquist rate for a 1.5 GHz passband
Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) system having
sufficient gain for A/D conversion
12
Assuring that τc < τo
Digital
LPF
Averaging
<Φ(τ)>
Autocorrelation
Φ(τ)
Digital Processor
Digital Lowpass
Filter (LPF)
Unbiased autocorrelation
for sample lengths of twice
expected τo
Average autocorrelations
to drive down noise floor
13
Constraints Upon Digital Lowpass Filter
Fourier transform of the autocorrelation of a zero-mean, white noise signal is the power spectrum of the signal, i.e:
• τc is inversely related to the bandwidth of the power spectrum
• For a Gaussian-shaped passband
τc = (Bandwidth)-1
In this case, minimum sensed snowpack thickness for Bandwidth = 1 GHz is ~70 cm
• Better filter design and/or wider bandwidth will reduce the minimum sensed snowpack thickness
14
Hypothetical Wideband AR
Sensor viewing a 1 m
SnowpackBandwidth = 1 GHz
Delay = 10 nsAttenuation = 37 dB
Integration = 1 s8th order Chebyshev
LPF with -45 dB stopband
15
Conclusion: Potential of Wideband AR
• Offers a deterministic measure of microwave travel time in snowpack and, when combined with average snowpack density from a thermo-physical model and index of refraction from a dielectric mixing model, Yields estimates of snowpack thickness and SWE
• Width of delayed autocorrelation peak will yield an estimate of sub-pixel variance in snowpack thickness
• Brightness of direct autocorrelation peak should yield freeze/thaw state of underlying soil
• Attenuation of delayed autocorrelation peak might yield estimate of snowpack wetness
• Additional potential applications:• Sensing freshwater ice thickness• Sensing planetary ice thickness
16
Secondary Advantages of Wideband AR
• Low power and low data rates characteristic of radiometers
• Simplified thermal design relative to traditional radiometers
• Relaxed requirement for absolute calibration
• Because frequencies below 10 GHz are within the band-widths of available A/D converters, the architecture of the analog front end can be greatly simplified at the cost of digital complexity
17
Significant Challenges
• Digital LPF will determine minimum sensed snowpack thickness
Required Bandwidth is likely > 1 GHz, but how much greater?
Critical filter characteristics: Minimum spectral width of transition to the stopband? Needed depth of stopband probably > 45 dB
• Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) with wideband system:
All RFI will impact Φ(0) but none are likely to cause false positives
Pulse RFI will likely require avoidance or removal
Communications RFI with long correlation times will raise noise floor
Within footprint, multi-source communications RFI might average out
18
Thank you!
Questions and/or Suggestions?
19
Future Work
• Experiment with design of Digital Lowpass Filter to achieve: A minimum necessary bandwidth Minimum spectral width of autocorrelation skirt Perhaps agile notch filtering of RFI
• Develop full simulation of Wideband AR sensor to explore full parameter space of sensor design
• Build proof-of-concept radiometer for boom on Microwave Geophysics Group’s field laboratory Test proof-of-concept sensor on various snowpacks
Top Related