NASA Ames Research Center
Maria BualatIntelligent Robotics [email protected]
Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
2Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Outline
Site Survey Overview
GPR Survey
Hydrogen Prospecting
3Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Human-Robot Site Survey Project
Systematic survey• Civil engineering survey, geophysical study,
resource prospecting, etc.• Systematic, detailed coverage
(necessary to ground-truth remote sensing)• Unproductive for crew to perform manually
(repetitive, tedious, time-consuming)
Source: T. Fong, M. Deans, et al., 2007. “Simulated Lunar RoboticSurvey at Terrestrial Analog Sites” (Proc. LPSC)
4Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Outline
Site Survey Overview
GPR Survey
Hydrogen Prospecting
5Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Haughton Crater Field Test
10 July – 3 August 2007• Two ARC K10 planetary rovers with survey instruments
3D scanning lidar for topographic mapping Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) for resource prospecting
• Test robotic survey systems and operational procedures• Multiple lunar analog sites at Haughton Crater (Canada)
Haughton Crater(Devon Island, Canada)
K10 rover
6Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Haughton Crater: A Lunar Analog
.
Shackleton Crater at the South Pole of the Moon is 19 km in diameter and might presentH2O ice in surrounding shadowed zones. It is a prime candidate site for human exploration.Haughton Crater, also ~ 20 km in size, is by far the best preserved impact structure of itsclass on Earth and is located in a H2O ground ice–rich rocky desert. Haughton may be thebest overall scientific and operational analog for lunar craters such as Shackleton.
Shackleton Crater, 19km dia.(lunar South Pole)
2005 Arecibo radar image
Haughton Crater, 20km dia.(Devon Island, Canada)
radar image
7Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Survey EquipmentK10 rover (3rd generation)
• 4-wheel drive, 4-wheel steer• Split rocker chassis• Size: 1.3 x 0.9 x 1.0 m (HxWxL) with sensor mast• Speed: 0.9 m/s (on 10 deg slope)• Power: 1900 W (Li-ion batteries)• Weight: 100 kg (including 25 kg payload)• dGPS, stereo cameras, compass, 2D laser scanner
Optech ILRIS-3D (topographic mapping)• Scanning 3D lidar with 40 deg FOV• Range: 3 to 1,500 m• Range accuracy: 7 mm @ 100 m
JPL CRUX GPR (subsurface mapping)• Ground-penetrating radar• 800 MHz center frequency• 15 cm resolution to 5 m depth
8Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
GPR Survey Displays
transectlines
1x1 metergrid
GPR data(vertical)
9Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
“Drill Hill” Survey
700 m
Survey plan• K10 robot on-site for 3 days• HMMWV simulates pressurized rover (temporary habitat)• Resource prospecting: subsurface ground-penetrating radar scans
(parallel transects with 50 m spacing)
10Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Drill Hill Survey (23-27 July 2007)
Survey plan(green, parallel
transectswith 50 mspacing)
K10 path(black)
Survey boundary(blue)
K10 robot path(real-time displayon Google Earth)
11Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Discovery Video - K10s at Haughton
12Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Lessons Learned
Operations• Dense coverage requires long distance driving• Continuous navigation is a key enabler for long-duration, long-
distance driving• Instrument constraints have a huge impact on systems
operations
Visualization tools• Essential for rapid contingency handling & high duty-cycle• Provide awareness of robot status & perception• Unified science & robot data facilitates situational awareness
13Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Outline
Site Survey Overview
GPR Survey
Hydrogen Prospecting
14Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
HYDRA Field Test
19 - 20 September 2007
K10 rover with integrated HYDRA tested at ARC
Demonstrate utility of HYDRA NS in a robotic prospectingtask for near-surface hydrogenous deposits.
Objectives:• Acquire HYDRA data as rover navigates grid of GPS way-points
chosen without prior knowledge of the target locations• Detect and localize near-surface enhanced hydrogen deposits
within the rover test area• Validate site-survey architecture and visualization tools in a test
with scientists in the loop
15Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
ARC Test Site
252Cf neutron source
16Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Visualization Tool
17Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Phase I: Site Characterization Traverse
N ⇒
18Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Epithermal Neutrons
Phase I: Site Characterization Traverse
N ⇒
19Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Thermalized Neutrons
Phase I: Site Characterization Traverse
N ⇒
20Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Phase II: ‘Interesting’ Locations
Return to ‘hot’ or ‘cold’ spots
Focus on characterizing extentof deposit
21Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
All Traverses Added Together
22Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Epithermal Neutron Map
All Traverses Added Together
23Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Thermal Neutron Map
All Traverses Added Together
24Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Thermal Neutron Map
All Traverses Added Together
Polyethylene “ice”Polyethylene “ice”
Beach SandGypsum
25Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
GoogleEarth View of Site
• Old satellite imagery• Low thermal neutron return associated with darker toned materials• Geochemical analysis of samples: darker has higher Fe2O3.• All materials have ~10 wt% water-equivalent hydrogen.
26Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
HYDRA Test Summary
Test site soils more like Mars than Moon!• High Fe2O3: 5 - 8 wt%, absorbs thermals• H2O: ~10 wt%, clays plus moisture
Detected, located shallow “ice” proxies• But test site soil H2O obscured deeper deposits
Better lunar analog test site needed• Dry material, no hydrous minerals, lower FeO
27Robotic Site Survey for ISRU
Conclusion
Key Points• Systematic survey is one task that should be performed by robots
Robotic surveying is realistic & achievable (TRL 5) Unproductive for crew to have to perform manually
• Intermittent control is sufficient for IVA & ground operations• Mission performance can be increased by off-loading utility tasks
(routine, tedious, repetitive) to robots
Intelligent Robotics GroupIntelligent Systems Division
NASA Ames Research Center
irg.arc.nasa.gov
Copyright © 2009
Top Related