DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
EAST\150446317.14
ROBBIN L. ITKIN (SBN 117105) [email protected] DLA PIPER LLP (US) 2000 Avenue of the Stars Suite 400 North Tower Los Angeles, California 90067-4704 Tel: (310) 595-3000 Fax: (310) 595-3300
JOHN K. LYONS (Pro Hac Vice) [email protected] KATIE ALLISON (Pro Hac Vice) [email protected] DLA PIPER LLP (US) 444 West Lake Street, Suite 900 Chicago, Illinois 60606-0089 Tel: (312) 368-4000 Fax: (312) 236-7516
Attorneys for Jonathan D. King as Chapter 7 Trustee
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES DIVISION
In re:
ZETTA JET USA, INC., a California corporation,
Debtor.
Lead Case No.: 2:17-bk-21386-SK
Chapter 7
Jointly Administered With: Case No.: 2:17-bk-21387-SK
CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE’S APPLICATION TO EMPLOY OON & BAZUL LLP AS SPECIAL COUNSEL, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 327(a) AND 330 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, BANKRUPTCY RULE 2014 AND LOCAL BANKRUPTCY RULE 2014-1, NUNC PRO TUNC TO DECEMBER 6, 2017; DECLARATION OF TAN MEI YEN IN SUPPORT THEREOF
[No Hearing Required Unless Requested – Pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 2014-1]
In re:
ZETTA JET PTE, LTD., a Singaporean corporation,
Debtor.
☐ Affects Both Debtors
☐ Affects Zetta Jet USA, Inc., a California corporation, only ☒ Affects Zetta Jet PTE, Ltd., a Singaporean corporation, only
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
EAST\150446317.14
TO THE HONORABLE SANDRA R. KLEIN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE, THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, THE TWENTY LARGEST UNSECURED CREDITORS, THE AIRCRAFT FINANCING PARTIES, AND SPECIAL SERVICE PARTIES:
Jonathan D. King, solely in his capacity as the duly appointed chapter 7 trustee (the
“Chapter 7 Trustee”) in the above-captioned, jointly administered bankruptcy cases (the “Chapter
7 Cases”) of Zetta Jet USA, Inc. (“Zetta Jet USA”) and Zetta Jet PTE, Ltd. (“Zetta Jet PTE,” and
together with Zetta Jet USA, the “Debtors”), hereby applies (the “Application”) to this Court for
an order, pursuant to Sections 327(a) and 330 of title 11 of the United States Code (the
“Bankruptcy Code”), Rule 2014 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy
Rules”), and Rule 2014-1 of the Local Bankruptcy Rules of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of California (the “Local Bankruptcy Rules”), authorizing the Chapter 7
Trustee’s retention and employment of Oon & Bazul LLP (the “Firm”) as special counsel to the
Chapter 7 Trustee in Singapore. More specifically, contemporaneously herewith, the Chapter 7
Trustee is filing retention papers for KordaMentha, which will, among other things, serve as the
Chapter 7 Trustee’s Singapore-based representative to assist him in carrying out his duties as
foreign representative (the “Singapore Liquidators”).1 The Singapore court has granted limited
recognition to the Chapter 7 Trustee to apply to set aside or appeal an injunction obtained by Asia
Aviation Holdings Pte Ltd in Singapore, and has deferred the Chapter 7 Trustee’s recognition
application, which is to be reinstated after the injunction has been disposed of.2 If the Singapore
1 Under Singapore law, liquidators are akin to foreign representatives under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code. 2 As stated above, on September 15, 2017, the Chapter 11 cases were filed. Three days later, on September 18, 2017, together, Geoffrey Cassidy (“Cassidy”), through his company Asia Aviation Holdings Pte. Ltd., and Li Qi, through his company Truly Great Global Limited, filed an ex parte application for an injunction in Singapore to enjoin Debtor Zetta Jet PTE and its officers from continuing the Chapter 11 Cases. In support of this application, Cassidy signed an affidavit that falsely asserted, among other things, that he was wrongfully accused of misappropriating millions of dollars from the Debtors (which the Chapter 7 Trustee’s investigation has since confirmed) and had a “rescue plan” that could have staved off the Chapter 11 filings (which also was fictitious).
Relying on Cassidy’s misleading affidavit, Judicial Commissioner Valerie Thean of the Singapore Court in case number Case No.: HC/S 864/2017 (the “Singapore Original Proceeding”) granted the ex parte application and entered the injunction (the “Ex Parte Injunction”).
On September 29, 2017, after briefing by the Debtors, Li Qi , and other interested parties, the Bankruptcy Court found that the Ex Parte Injunction violated the automatic stay and was void. See H’rg. Tr., Sept. 29, 2017, at 44:4-8.
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
EAST\150446317.14
Court grants the Chapter 7 Trustee’s recognition application, and if the Singapore Liquidators are
appointed by the Singapore Court, the Singapore Liquidators will provide services to assist the
Chapter 7 Trustee in the carrying out his duties as foreign representative.
Under Singapore law, the Chapter 7 Trustee requires local counsel from Singapore to
assist him and his local representatives in the performance of his duties and appear in Singapore
courts. Accordingly, the Chapter 7 Trustee has selected the Firm to serve as local counsel to him
and the Singapore Liquidators as local representatives in connection with the insolvency
proceedings pending in Singapore with respect to Zetta Jet PTE. In addition, the Firm is
providing special local counsel services to the Chapter 7 Trustee in connection with the
recognition proceedings. Specifically, Singapore courts impose restrictions on foreign law firms
(even those with offices in Singapore) appearing before them and require that a local firm appear
instead. The Chapter 7 Trustee has selected the Firm to undertake this task, and the Firm is
working in conjunction with DLA Piper Singapore Pte. Ltd. on this matter to coordinate services
on a cost-effective basis.3
The Chapter 7 Trustee is seeking appointment of the Firm effective as of December 6,
2017, the date when the Firm commenced performing services for the Chapter 7 Trustee, upon the
On December 13, 2017, the Chapter 7 Trustee sought recognition in Singapore of the Bankruptcy Cases. After briefing by the parties, on January 26, 2018, Judge Aedit Abdullah of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore ( the “Singapore Recognition Court”) granted in part and deferred in part the Chapter 7 Trustee’s recognition application.
In its ruling (attached hereto as Exhibit A), the Singapore Recognition Court found that public policy exception under Article 6 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, as enacted in Singapore under the Tenth Schedule of the Companies Act, precluded full recognition due the pendency of the Ex Parte Injunction. However, the Singapore Recognition Court granted limited recognition to allow the Chapter 7 Trustee to apply to lift the Ex Parte Injunction in the Singapore Original Proceeding and, if successful, return to the Singapore Recognition Court for further relief.
The Chapter 7 Trustee intends to seek relief from the Singapore Original Proceeding to vacate the Ex Parte Injunction based upon, among other grounds, Cassidy’s submission of an affidavit of materially false representations designed to deceive the Court in the Singapore Original Proceeding to grant the Ex Parte Injunction.
3 The lead attorney at the Firm who worked on the recognition proceedings in conjunction with DLA Piper Singapore Pte. Ltd. moved to the Firm from the Singapore firm of WongPartnership LLP. Give this attorney’s institutional knowledge of the recognition proceedings, the Chapter 7 Trustee determined, in the exercise of his business judgment, to retain the Firm to handle the recognition matters.
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
EAST\150446317.14
terms and conditions described below.4 In support of this Application, the Chapter 7 Trustee
relies upon the Declaration of Tan Mei Yen (the “Declaration”), which is incorporated herein by
reference. In further support of this Application, the Chapter 7 Trustee respectfully states as
follows:
I. STATUS OF CASE AND JURISDICTION
1. On September 15, 2017 (the “Petition Date”), the Debtors commenced bankruptcy
proceedings by filing voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (the
“Chapter 11 Cases”).
2. On September 29, 2017, the Court entered the Order Granting Debtors’
Emergency Motion to Approve Stipulation for Appointment of Chapter 11 Trustee Pursuant to §
1104 [Docket No. 120]. On October 5, 2017, the Office of the United States Trustee (“U.S.
Trustee”) filed the Notice of Appointment of Chapter 11 Trustee, indicating that the U.S. Trustee
had appointed Mr. King as the chapter 11 trustee (the “Chapter 11 Trustee”) in the Chapter 11
Cases [Docket No. 155].
3. On October 12, 2017, the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors (the “Committee”).
4. On November 30, 2017 (the “Shutdown Date”), based upon a lack of funds to
operate the Debtors’ business, the Chapter 11 Trustee shut down operations, terminated all
employees, and, on December 4, 2017, this Court entered the orders granting the Chapter 11
Trustee’s motions to convert the Debtors’ Chapter 11 Cases to cases under Chapter 7 of the
Bankruptcy Code (the “Conversion Date”) [Docket No. 452 for Zetta Jet USA and Docket No. 52
for Zetta Jet PTE]. Upon entry of the orders converting the cases, the Committee was effectively
disbanded and ceased to exist.
5. On December 5, 2017, the Notice of Appointment of Trustee and Fixing of Bond
was filed, pursuant to which the U.S. Trustee appointed Mr. King to serve as the Chapter 7
4The Firm has been providing critical services since the Conversion Date (as defined below). Due to delays
associated with conflicts checks and assignment of tasks and coordination of services among each of the Chapter 7 Trustee’s professionals, this Application was filed as soon as possible.
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 4 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
EAST\150446317.14
Trustee in these Chapter 7 Cases [Docket No. 458 for Zetta Jet USA and Docket No. 53 for Zetta
Jet PTE]. After the Section 341(a) meeting of creditors that was held on January 8, 2018, Mr.
King was made the permanent Trustee in the Debtors’ Chapter 7 Cases.
6. This Court has jurisdiction over these Chapter 7 Cases, the Debtors’ estates, and
this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(a), 1334(b) and 1334(e). This matter is a core
proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157. Venue of these cases and these proceedings
in this district is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. The basis for the relief
requested herein are Sections 327(a) and 330 of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rule 2014,
and Local Bankruptcy Rule 2014-1.
A. Employment of Oon & Bazul LLP as Special Counsel to the Chapter 7 Trustee
7. As the Chapter 7 Trustee appointed in these Chapter 7 Cases, Mr. King is
responsible for the performance of certain duties, as set forth in Section 704 of the Bankruptcy
Code. To assist him in the performance of his duties, the Chapter 7 Trustee has determined, in
the exercise of his business judgment, to retain certain professionals.
8. As noted above, contemporaneously herewith, the Chapter 7 Trustee is filing
retention pleadings for KordaMentha, which will, among other things, serve as the Chapter 7
Trustee’s Singapore Liquidators, and will provide services to assist the Chapter 7 Trustee in
carrying out his duties as foreign representative. Under Singapore law, the Chapter 7 Trustee
requires local counsel from Singapore to assist him and his local representatives in the
performance of his duties and appear in Singapore courts. Accordingly, the Chapter 7 Trustee has
selected the Firm to serve as local counsel to him and the Singapore Liquidators in connection
with the insolvency proceedings pending in Singapore with respect to Zetta Jet PTE, as required
by Singapore law.
9. In addition, Singapore courts impose restrictions on foreign law firms (even those
with offices in Singapore) appearing before them and require that a local firm appear
instead. The Chapter 7 Trustee has selected the Firm to assist him with the recognition
proceedings. The Firm is working in conjunction with DLA Piper Singapore Pte. Ltd. to
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 5 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
EAST\150446317.14
coordinate services on a cost-effective basis.5
10. The proposed Services outlined hereunder are necessary to carry out asset recovery
and wind down efforts in Singapore and will not involve duplication of services of other
professionals retained by the Chapter 7 Trustee such as KCP Advisory Group LLC and Michael
Goldman & Associates LLC (focusing on US based accounting and financial services and tax
return preparation and filing, respectively), PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory Services LLC
(focusing on forensic services in Singapore), Braunco, Inc. (focusing on U.S. asset liquidation
services), Seabury Corporate Finance LLC, together with its broker-dealer affiliate, Seabury
Securities LLC (providing limited interim financial services pending transition to KCP Advisory
Group LLC), and KordaMentha (serving as the Chapter 7 Trustee’s local representative and
liquidation agent in Singapore). The Chapter 7 Trustee will continue to monitor professionals to
ensure cost effective delivery of services.
B. Scope of Services to be Provided
11. As set forth below, the Firm will provide certain complementary legal services in
connection with the Chapter 7 Trustee’s recovery efforts in the Singapore courts and under
Singapore law generally, and assist, and serve as local counsel to, the Singapore Liquidators, if
appointed (collectively, the “Services”), pursuant to an engagement letter entered into between
the Firm and the Chapter 7 Trustee, effective as of December 6, 2017, which was amended and
superseded by an engagement letter dated as of December 18, 2017 (together, the “Engagement
Agreement”).
12. Pursuant to the Engagement Agreement, the Firm will
advise on matters of Singapore law relating to the Chapter 7 Trustee’s wind down efforts in Singapore and those of the Singapore liquidators, if appointed;
5 The lead attorney at the Firm who worked on the recognition proceedings in conjunction with DLA Piper Singapore Pte. Ltd. moved to the Firm from the Singapore firm of WongPartnership LLP. Give this attorney’s institutional knowledge of the recognition proceedings, the Chapter 7 Trustee determined, in the exercise of his business judgment, to retain the Firm to handle the recognition matters.
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 6 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
EAST\150446317.14
represent the Chapter 7 Trustee, and by extension, the Singapore Liquidators, in respect of proceedings brought in Singapore courts or in other legal matters in Singapore;
provide such other related services at the request of the Chapter 7 Trustee and the Singapore Liquidators, as requested by the Chapter 7 Trustee; and
represent the Chapter 7 Trustee in certain litigation pending before the Singapore court.
C. Disclosures Under Bankruptcy Rule 2014
13. As discussed in further detail below, the Debtor seeks an order pursuant to Section
327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code authorizing the Chapter 7 Trustee to engage the Firm to provide
the above-described legal services, as contemplated by the Engagement Agreement.
14. Based upon the Declaration, to the best of the Chapter 7 Trustee’s knowledge, the
Firm and its personnel to be retained by the Chapter 7 Trustee: (a) are not equity security holders,
or insiders of the Debtors; (b) are not and were not, within the two years before the petition date,
directors, officers, or employees of the Debtors; and (c) do not have an interest materially adverse
to the interests of the estate or any class of creditors or equity security holders by reason of any
direct or indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the Debtors. The Firm is not a
creditor of the Debtors’ estates.
15. Further, based upon the Declaration, and except as set forth herein and therein, to
the best of the Chapter 7 Trustee’s knowledge, the Firm and its personnel to be retained by the
Chapter 7 Trustee are disinterested persons, who do not hold or represent an interest adverse to
the Debtors’ estates, and, except as set forth in the Declaration, do not have any connection either
with the Debtor, its creditors, or any other parties in interest in this case, with their respective
attorneys or accountants, with any judge of this Court, with the U.S. Trustee, or with any person
employed in the Office of the U.S. Trustee.
16. The Firm will periodically review their respective files during the pendency of
these Chapter 7 Cases to ensure that no conflicts or other disqualifying circumstances exist or
arise. If any new relevant facts or relationships are discovered or arise, the Firm will use
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 7 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
EAST\150446317.14
reasonable efforts to identify such further developments and will file promptly a supplemental
declaration, as required by Bankruptcy Rule 2014(a).
D. Compensation Terms
17. The Firm has not received a retainer or any payments in connection with this
engagement and has not agreed to share any compensation received or to be received on account
of services performed in connection with these Chapter 7 Cases with any other party other than
among its partners and members. As set forth in the Engagement Agreement, the Firm will
perform its Services for which it shall bill the Debtors at the following hourly rates: Tan Mei Yen,
the partner in charge of the matter, at SGD $690 per hour,6 Ng Wei Long, associate, at SGD $390
per hour,7 and trainees at SGD $120 per hour8 (the “Fee Structure”).
18. Subject to approval of the Court through the filing of fee applications, the Chapter 7
Trustee will reimburse the Firm for services rendered and reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by the Firm in connection with the services to be rendered under the
Engagement Agreement. The Firm shall be reimbursed for economy class travel (or its
equivalent) except for international travel greater than five (5) hours in duration, in which case
the Firm’s personnel may be permitted to book in business class.
19. Upon termination of this Engagement Agreement, and subject to approval
of the Court , the Chapter 7 Trustee shall reimburse the Firm only for such out-of-pocket
expenses reasonably incurred or accrued prior to termination. Invoices submitted to the
Chapter 7 Trustee will, in each case, include adequate detail including employee name, date of
expense charge, type of expense and amount.
20. The Fee Structure is consistent with and typical of arrangements entered into by
other advisors of comparable standing in connection with the rendering of similar services to
clients such as the Chapter 7 Trustee. The Firm and the Chapter 7 Trustee believe that the
foregoing compensation arrangement is both reasonable and market-based.
6 As of January 30, 2018, this is the approximate equivalent of USD$525.95. 7 As of January 30, 2018, this is the approximate equivalent of USD$297.28. 8 As of January 30, 2018, this is the approximate equivalent of USD$91.47.
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 8 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
EAST\150446317.14
II. INDEMNIFICATION
21. Paragraph 14 of Appendix 1 to the Engagement Agreement also provides that the
estates will indemnify the Firm in certain circumstances and on certain terms, and more
specifically, in the event of the Chapter 7 Trustee’s fault, negligence, or lack of care. Similar
indemnification provisions have been approved by this Court with respect to other retained
professionals.
III. BASIS FOR RELIEF REQUESTED
22. Pursuant to Section 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, a trustee is authorized to
employ professional persons “that do not hold or represent an interest adverse to the estate, and
that are disinterested persons, to represent or assist the trustee in carrying out its duties under [the
Bankruptcy Code.]” 11 U.S.C. § 327(a).
23. The Chapter 7 Trustee seeks approval of the Fee Structure under Section 328(a) of
the Bankruptcy Code, which provides, in relevant part, that the Chapter 7 Trustee “with the
court’s approval, may employ or authorize the employment of a professional person under
Section 327 . . . on any reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including on a retainer,
on an hourly basis, on a fixed or percentage fee basis, or on a contingency fee basis . . . “ 11
U.S.C. § 328(a). Section 328 of the Bankruptcy Code permits the compensation of professionals,
including auditors, accountants, and financial advisors, on more flexible terms that reflect the
nature of their services and market conditions, which is a significant departure from prior
bankruptcy practice relating to the compensation of professionals. As the United States Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recognized in In re National Gypsum Co., 123 F.3d 861, 862 (5th
Cir. 1997) (citations omitted):
[p]rior to 1978, the most able professionals were often unwilling to work for bankruptcy estates where their compensation would be subject to the uncertainties of what a judge thought the work was worth after it had been done. The uncertainty continues under the present §330 of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides that the court award to professional consultants reasonable compensation based on relevant factors of time and comparable costs, etc. Under present § 328 the professionals may avoid that uncertainty by obtaining court approval of compensation agreed to with the trustee (or debtor or committee).
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 9 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
EAST\150446317.14
Id. at 862. Owing to this inherent uncertainty, courts in this jurisdiction have approved similar
arrangements that contain reasonable terms and conditions under Section 328 of the Bankruptcy
Code. See, e.g., In re Aspect Software Parent, Inc., Case No. 16-10597 (MFW) (Bankr. D. Del.
Apr. 21, 2016); In re EveryWare Global, Inc., Case No. 15-10743 (LSS) (Bankr. D. Del. May 20,
2015.
24. Thus, Section 328(a) of the Bankruptcy Code permits this Court to approve the
terms and conditions of the Firm’s engagement as set forth in the Engagement Agreement. The
Fee Structure appropriately reflects the nature and scope of services to be provided by the Firm,
and the fee structures typically utilized by the Firm and other similar firms outside of chapter 7.
The retention of the Firm is an exercise of the reasonable business judgment of the Chapter 7
Trustee.
25. The Firm will file fee applications consistent with all applicable orders of the
Court.
IV. CONCLUSION
WHEREFORE, the Chapter 7 Trustee respectfully requests that the Court grant
this Application, and such other and further relief that the Court deems just and proper.
DATED: February 9, 2018 DLA PIPER LLP (US)
By: /s/ Robbin L. Itkin ROBBIN L. ITKIN (SBN 117105) JOHN K. LYONS (Pro Hac Vice) KATIE ALLISON (Pro Hac Vice)
Attorneys for the Chapter 7 Trustee
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 10 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 11 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 12 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 13 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 14 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 15 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 16 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 17 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 18 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 19 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 20 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 21 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 22 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 23 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 24 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 25 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 26 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 27 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 28 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 29 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12
EAST\150446317.14
DECLARATION OF TAN MEI YEN
I, TAN MEI YEN, declare:
1. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth below and, if called upon to
testify, would and could competently testify to the matters set forth in this declaration (the
“Declaration”).
2. I am a Partner and the Head of the Restructuring and Insolvency Practice at the
Oon & Bazul LLP (the “Firm”). I submit this Declaration in support of the Chapter 7 Trustee’s
Application to Employ Oon & Bazul LLP as Special Counsel, Pursuant to Sections 327(a) and
328 of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rule 2014, and Local Bankruptcy Rule 2014-1, Nunc
Pro Tunc to December 6, 2017 (the “Application”).1
3. The Chapter 7 Trustee has requested that the Firm provide certain complementary
legal services in connection with the Chapter 7 Trustee’s recovery efforts in the Singapore courts
and under Singapore law generally, and assist, and serve as local counsel to, the Singapore
Liquidators, if appointed, and to serve as counsel to the Chapter 7 Trustee in connection with the
recognition proceedings pending before the Singapore court (collectively, the “Services”),
pursuant to an engagement letter entered into between the Firm and the Chapter 7 Trustee,
effective as of December 6, 2017, which was amended and superseded by an engagement letter
dated as of December 18, 2017 (together, the “Engagement Agreement”), which is attached
hereto as Exhibit 1.
4. Pursuant to the Engagement Agreement, the Firm will:
advise on matters of Singapore law relating to the Chapter 7 Trustee’s wind down efforts in Singapore and those of the Singapore Liquidators, if appointed;
represent the Chapter 7 Trustee, and by extension, the Singapore Liquidators, in respect of proceedings brought in Singapore courts or in other legal matters in Singapore;
provide such other related services at the request of the Chapter 7 Trustee and the Singapore Liquidators, as requested by the Chapter 7 Trustee; and
1 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed in the Application.
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 30 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13
EAST\150446317.14
represent the Chapter 7 Trustee in certain litigation pending before the Singapore court.
5. The Firm will provide critical services that complement, not duplicate, the services
provided by the Chapter 7 Trustee’s counsel and other professionals.
6. Summaries of my experience and qualifications, along with the personnel who will
be primarily responsible for this engagement, are attached hereto collectively as Exhibit 2.
26. The Firm has not received a retainer or any payments in connection with this
engagement and has not agreed to share any compensation received or to be received on account
of services performed in connection with these Chapter 7 Cases with any other party other than
among its partners and members. As set forth in the Engagement Agreement, the Firm will
perform its Services for which it shall bill the Debtors at the following hourly rates Tan Mei Yen,
the partner in charge of the matter, at SGD $690 per hour,2 Ng Wei Long, associate, at SGD $390
per hour,3 and trainees at SGD $120 per hour4 (the “Fee Structure”).
7. Subject to approval of the Court through the filing of a fee application, the Chapter
7 Trustee will reimburse the Firm for services rendered and reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by the Firm in connection with the services to be rendered under the
Engagement Agreement. The Firm shall be reimbursed for economy class travel (or its
equivalent) except for international travel greater than five (5) hours in duration, in which case
the Firm’s personnel may be permitted to book in business class.
8. Upon termination of this Engagement Agreement, and subject to approval
of the Court , the Chapter 7 Trustee shall reimburse the Firm only for such out-of-pocket
expenses reasonably incurred or accrued prior to termination. Invoices submitted to the
Chapter 7 Trustee will, in each case, include adequate detail including employee name, date of
expense charge, type of expense and amount.
9. The Fee Structure is consistent with and typical of arrangements entered into by
other advisors of comparable standing in connection with the rendering of similar services to
2 As of January 30, 2018, this is the approximate equivalent of USD$525.95. 3 As of January 30, 2018, this is the approximate equivalent of USD$297.28. 4 As of January 30, 2018, this is the approximate equivalent of USD$91.47.
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 31 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14
EAST\150446317.14
clients such as the Chapter 7 Trustee. I believe that the foregoing compensation arrangement is
both reasonable and market-based.
10. To the best of my knowledge, except as otherwise set forth below, based upon a
review of the Firm’s regular computerized records, (a) neither I, nor any partner, associate, or
employee of the Firm has a connection with the Debtors, their creditors, the Office of the United
States Trustee for the Central District of California, Los Angeles Division, any person employed
in the office of the U.S. Trustee or any other party with an actual or potential interest in these
Chapter 7 Cases or their respective attorneys or accountants; (b) neither I, nor any nor any
partner, associate, or other personnel of the Firm is an equity security holder or insider of the
Debtors or the Chapter 7 Trustee; (c) the Firm is not and was not, within two years of the Petition
Date, a director, officer or employee of the Debtors; and (d) the Firm does not have an interest
adverse to the Debtors, their respective estates or any class of creditors or equity security holders
by reason of any direct or indirect relationship to, connection with or interest in the Debtors, or
for any other reason. The Firm is not a creditor of the Debtors’ estates. Accordingly, the Frim is
a “disinterested person,” as defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and as required by
Section 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.
11. The Firm represents World Fuel Services, a creditor of one or more of the Debtors,
in matters wholly unrelated to these Chapter 7 Cases or the matters described in the Application
for which the Firm is providing services.
12. The Firm and its personnel are not related to or employees of the Office of the
United States Trustee or the United States Bankruptcy Judge herein.
[Signature Page Follows]
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 32 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 33 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16
EAST\150446317.14
Exhibit 1
[Engagement Letter]
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 34 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 35 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 36 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 37 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 38 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 39 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 40 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 41 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 42 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 43 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 44 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 45 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 46 of 58
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 47 of 58
DLA PIPER LLP (US)LOS A NG EL ES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
17
EAST\150446317.14
Exhibit 2
[Biographies]
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 48 of 58
Particulars
Mei Yen Tan
Partner, Head of Restructuring and Insolvency Practice
Credentials
University of Warwick
Bachelor of Laws (LL.B)
Admissions
Advocate & Solicitor (Singapore)
Advocate & Solicitor (Malaysia)
Barrister-At-Law (Middle Temple)
Solicitor, England and Wales
Professional Experience
Mei Yen’s main areas of practice include cross-border disputes, consensual and non-
consensual insolvency and restructuring, corporate fraud and investigations. She has acted
for and advised individuals, multi-national corporations, court-appointed administrators,
distressed and special situations funds and banks in Singapore and abroad. Prior to joining
Oon & Bazul, Mei Yen was a partner at one of the Big Four domestic law practices in
Singapore.
Professional Memberships
She is one of the founding members of the Singapore Network of the International Women’s
Insolvency and Restructuring Confederation (IWIRC) and is currently the Co-Chairperson of
the Singapore Network.
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 49 of 58
Particulars
Ng Wei Long
Associate
Credentials
Singapore Management University
LLB (Hons)
Admissions
Advocate & Solicitor (Singapore)
Professional Experience
Wei Long was called to the Singapore Bar in 2015. He presently practices in Oon & Bazul as
part of the Restructuring and Insolvency Practice Group. Prior to joining the Restructuring
and Insolvency Practice at Oon & Bazul LLP, Wei Long’s primary area of practice was in
litigation and dispute resolution with a focus on shipping and maritime matters.
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 50 of 58
Particulars
Shannen Tan
Trainee
Education
University of Exeter (2016)
Bachelor of Laws (LL.B), First Class Honours
Experience
Prior to joining Oon & Bazul LLP’s restructuring and insolvency practice, Shannen completed her first stint of training with the firm’s international trade and commercial litigation practice groups.
Shannen was also a Senior Officer’s Law Clerk at the State Courts of Singapore where she shadowed the District Court Judges of the Civil Justice Division during her days as an undergraduate.
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 51 of 58
This form is mandatory. It has been approved for use by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California.
June 2012 F 9013-3.1.PROOF.SERVICE EAST\151263638.1
PROOF OF SERVICE OF DOCUMENT I am over the age of 18 and not a party to this bankruptcy case or adversary proceeding. My business address is:
DLA Piper LLP (US) 2000 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 400 North Tower
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4704 A true and correct copy of the foregoing document entitled CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE’S APPLICATION TO EMPLOY OON & BAZUL LLP AS SPECIAL COUNSEL, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 327(a) AND 330 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, BANKRUPTCY RULE 2014 AND LOCAL BANKRUPTCY RULE 2014-1, NUNC PRO TUNC TO DECEMBER 6, 2017; DECLARATION OF TAN MEI YEN IN SUPPORT THEREOF will be served or was served (a) on the judge in chambers in the form and manner required by LBR 5005-2(d); and (b) in the manner stated below: 1. TO BE SERVED BY THE COURT VIA NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING (NEF): Pursuant to controlling General Orders and LBR, the foregoing document will be served by the court via NEF and hyperlink to the document. On February 9, 2018, I checked the CM/ECF docket for this bankruptcy case or adversary proceeding and determined that the following persons are on the Electronic Mail Notice List to receive NEF transmission at the email addresses stated below: John-Patrick M. Fritz Zetta Jet USA, Inc. [email protected] John-Patrick M. Fritz Zetta Jet PTE Ltd. [email protected] Juliet Y. Oh Zetta Jet USA, Inc. [email protected] Ron Bender Zetta Jet PTE Ltd. [email protected] Ron Bender Zetta Jet USA, Inc. [email protected] Jeanne M. Jorgensen Universal Weather & Aviation [email protected] Jeanne M. Jorgensen Universal Fuels, Inc. [email protected] Dawn M. Coulson Scout Aviation II, LLC [email protected] William W. Huckins Ample United Limited [email protected] Michael S. Greger Ample United Limited [email protected] Matthew S. Walker Bombardier Aerospace [email protected] Alan I. Nahmias NEF Request [email protected] Mary H. Rose NEF Request [email protected] Michael D. Breslauer Big Fly LLC [email protected] Stephen F. Biegenzahn NEF Request [email protected] David W. Meadows NEF Request [email protected] Andrew Troop Bombardier Aerospace [email protected] Dare Law U.S. Trustee [email protected] Michael L. Bernstein Li Entities [email protected] Charles A. Malloy Li Entities [email protected] Lisa Hill Fenning Li Entities [email protected] Tiffany M. Ikeda Li Entities [email protected] Michael B. Lubic New Target Investments [email protected] Victor A. Vilaplana ARINC Direct, LLC [email protected] Jeffrey N. Pomerantz Creditor Committee [email protected] Debra I. Grassgreen Creditor Committee [email protected] John W. Lucas Creditor Committee [email protected] Paul Laurin Rolls-Royce Deutschland [email protected] Michael K. McCrory Rolls-Royce Deutschland [email protected] Jonathan Sundheimer Rolls-Royce Deutschland [email protected] Michael A. Sweet Associated Energy Group [email protected] Rebecca J. Winthrop CAE SimuFlite, Inc. [email protected] Scott M. Ewing Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy [email protected]; [email protected] Nolan Thomas New Target Investments Limited [email protected]
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 52 of 58
This form is mandatory. It has been approved for use by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California.
June 2012 F 9013-3.1.PROOF.SERVICE EAST\151263638.1
� Service information continued on attached page 2. SERVED BY UNITED STATES MAIL: On February 9, 2018, I served the following persons and/or entities at the last known addresses in this bankruptcy case or adversary proceeding by placing a true and correct copy thereof in a sealed envelope in the United States mail, first class, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows. Listing the judge here constitutes a declaration that mailing to the judge will be completed no later than 24 hours after the document is filed. � Service information continued on attached page 3. SERVED BY PERSONAL DELIVERY, OVERNIGHT MAIL, FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION OR EMAIL (state method for each person or entity served): Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 5 and/or controlling LBR, on February 9, 2018, I served the following persons and/or entities by personal delivery, overnight mail service, or (for those who consented in writing to such service method), by facsimile transmission and/or email as follows. Listing the judge here constitutes a declaration that personal delivery on, or overnight mail to, the judge will be completed no later than 24 hours after the document is filed. VIA HAND DELIVERY Honorable Sandra R. Klein United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California 255 East Temple Street, Suite 1582 Los Angeles, California 90012 Ron Maroko Office of the United States Trustee 915 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1850 Los Angeles, CA 90017 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL (Party, who is being served if different, and email address for each) � Service information continued on attached page I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. February 9, 2018 Stephanie Lisko /s/ Stephanie Lisko Date Printed Name Signature
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 53 of 58
This form is mandatory. It has been approved for use by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California.
June 2012 F 9013-3.1.PROOF.SERVICE EAST\151263638.1
TO BE SERVED BY THE COURT VIA NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING (NEF) (Continued):
Matthew A. Lesnick NEF Request [email protected] Daniel H. Slate NEF Request [email protected] Douglas A. Plazak NEF Request [email protected] Ron Maroko US Trustee [email protected] Kimberly S. Winick Chelsea Jets [email protected] Robert Labate AVIC International Leasing Co. Ltd. [email protected] Alan Watson AVIC International Leasing Co. Ltd. [email protected] Michael McCollum New Jubilee Global Limited [email protected]
20 Largest Creditors Served via Electronic Mail
Bombardier Aerospace Corporation
c/o Matthew S. Walker Email: [email protected]
c/o Andrew Troop Email: [email protected]
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG
c/o Paul Laurin Email: [email protected]
c/o Michael K. McCrory Email: [email protected]
c/o Jonathan Sundheimer Email: [email protected]
World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
Attn.: Calvin Chia [email protected]
Universal Fuels, Inc. (UVAir)
c/o Jeanne M. Jorgensen Email: [email protected]
Rainbow Aviation Limited
Attn.: Benedict Tan [email protected]
CAE Simuflite, Inc.
c/o Rebecca J. Winthrop Email: [email protected]
Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp Ltd
c/o Jennifer W. Crastz [email protected]
Scout Aviation II, LLC
c/o Dawn M. Coulson Email: [email protected]
Universal Weather & Aviation Inc. (UWA)
c/o Jeanne M. Jorgensen Email: [email protected]
Festin Management
c/o James Torrey at Jimmy Jets Email: [email protected]
Hanergy [Yoda Aviation]
Attn.: John Zhang Email: [email protected]
Corporate Jet Support
Attn.: Whitne Keenan Email: [email protected]
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 54 of 58
This form is mandatory. It has been approved for use by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California.
June 2012 F 9013-3.1.PROOF.SERVICE EAST\151263638.1
Eurocontrol
Attn.: Nancy Coveliers Email: [email protected] [email protected]
Associated Energy Group, LLC (AEG Fuel)
Attn.: Christopher Clementi Email: [email protected]
c/o Michael A. Sweet Email: [email protected]
c/o Jack Praetzellis Email: [email protected]
Tongda Air Service
Attn.: Fuhua Mansion [email protected]
Wex Bank
Attn.: Kiran Patel [email protected]
Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.
Attn.: Doris Fuller [email protected]
UVAir European Fuelling Services Ltd
c/o Jeanne M. Jorgensen Email: [email protected]
ARINC Direct
c/o Victor A. Vilaplana Email: [email protected]
c/o Erika L. Morabito Email: [email protected]
c/o Brittany J. Nelson Email: [email protected]
SN 1360, LLC
c/o James Torrey at Jimmy Jets Email: [email protected]
Aircraft Finance and Aircraft Lease Parties by Electronic Mail
Angus Marine Ventures, Ltd.
c/o Stephen G. Larson Email: [email protected]
Jet Support Services (JSSI)
c/o Richard Schumacher Email: [email protected]
AVIC International Leasing Co., Ltd.
Attn.: Wayne Wong Email: [email protected]
c/o Robert J. Labate Email: [email protected]
c/o Alan J. Watson Email: [email protected]
New Target Investments Limited
c/o Michael Lubic Email: [email protected]
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 55 of 58
This form is mandatory. It has been approved for use by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California.
June 2012 F 9013-3.1.PROOF.SERVICE EAST\151263638.1
Big Fly LLC
c/o Michael D. Breslauer Email: [email protected]
Tony Robbins
c/o Alan I. Nahmias Email: [email protected]
c/o Stephen F. Biegenzahn Email: [email protected]
TVPX ARS, Inc.
Attn.: David Wall Email: [email protected]
Attorneys for Ample United Limited
c/o William W. Huckins [email protected]
c/o Michael S. Greger [email protected]
Attorney for Jet Aviation
c/o Sarah R. Borders [email protected]
SN 1360, LLC and SN 1372, LLC
Attn.: James Torrey at Jimmy Jets Email: [email protected]
Attorney for Scout Aviation II, LLC
c/o Dawn M. Coulson Email: [email protected]
Attorney for Bombardier Aerospace
c/o Matthew S. Walker Email: [email protected]
c/o Andrew Troop Email: [email protected]
Element Financial Corp.
Attn.: Michael O’Keefe Email: [email protected]
PTJ Associates LLC
Attn.: Stephen Hofer Email: [email protected]
Attorneys for Yuntian 3 Leasing Company Limited and Yuntian 4 Leasing Company Limited
Philip S. Warden Email: [email protected]
M. David Minnick Email: [email protected]
ECN Aviation Inc. (f/k/a Element Aviation)
Attn.: Michael O’Keefe Email: [email protected]
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 56 of 58
This form is mandatory. It has been approved for use by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California.
June 2012 F 9013-3.1.PROOF.SERVICE EAST\151263638.1
Other Requests for Service by Electronic Mail
Attorneys for the Debtors
c/o John-Patrick M. Fritz Email: [email protected]
c/o Juliet Y. Oh Email: [email protected]
c/o Ron Bender Email: [email protected]
Attorney for the Li Entities
c/o Michael L. Bernstein Email: [email protected]
c/o Charles A. Malloy Email: [email protected]
c/o Lisa Hill Fenning Email: [email protected]
c/o Tiffany M. Ikeda Email: [email protected]
United States Trustee
Attn.: Dare Law Email: [email protected]
Attn.: Ron Maroko Email: [email protected]
Attorney for Universal Weather & Aviation and Universal Fuels, Inc.
c/o Jeanne M. Jorgensen Email: [email protected]
Attorney for Rolls-Royce Deutschland
c/o Paul Laurin Email: [email protected]
c/o Michael K. McCrory Email: [email protected]
c/o Jonathan Sundheimer Email: [email protected]
Attorneys for ARINC Direct, LLC
c/o Victor A. Vilaplana Email: [email protected]
c/o Erika L. Morabito Email: [email protected]
c/o Brittany J. Nelson Email: [email protected]
Advanced Air Management, Inc.
Attn.: James Seagrim Email: [email protected]
Attorney for CAE Simuflite, Inc.
c/o Rebecca J. Winthrop Email: [email protected]
Attorney for Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp Ltd.
c/o Jennifer W. Crastz [email protected]
Bank of Utah, Owner / Trustee
Attn.: Colleen Schulthies Email: [email protected]
Export Development Canada
Attn.: Jeff Blattman Email: [email protected]
WEX Bank
Attn.: Kiran Patel [email protected]
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 57 of 58
This form is mandatory. It has been approved for use by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California.
June 2012 F 9013-3.1.PROOF.SERVICE EAST\151263638.1
Hanergy (Yoda Aviation)
Attn.: John Zhang Email: [email protected]
Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.
Attn.: Doris Fuller [email protected]
Corporate Jet Support
Attn.: Whitne Keenan Email: [email protected]
Attorney for New Jubilee Global Limited
c/o Michael B. McCollum Email: [email protected]
Case 2:17-bk-21386-SK Doc 612 Filed 02/09/18 Entered 02/09/18 19:53:03 Desc Main Document Page 58 of 58
Top Related