By:
Azrul Abdullah
Norshamshina Mat IsaUniversiti Teknologi Mara (PERLIS), Malaysia
Ku Nor Izah Ku IsmailSchool Of Accountancy, Universiti Utara, Malaysia
Risk Management Committee and Disclosure of Hedging
Activities Information among Malaysian Listed Companies
Introduction Previous studies have reported that derivatives are often used by
numerous companies as a tool for corporate risk management.
(Stulz 2004)
Derivatives act as a mechanism to hedge risks - offset risk resulting from
their business activities
Although derivatives can offer assistance to mitigate financial risk
exposure, it also can magnify risks at the company level which
may lead to financial distress and collapse
Enron, Baring and etc
Must be handled with extra care-so the used of derivatives will help
more than hurt.
Introduction (Cont) Since derivatives are held in many business transactions together
with high financial risk exposure and involve huge amounts of a
company’s funds, it is therefore essential for the company to have
well-defined internal policies, practices and controls for the use of
derivatives (Chung & Fung, 1995)
The derivative and hedging activities information is important
because:
For users of financial statements, it is essential for them to understand more
and have enhanced information regarding the companies’ usage of
derivatives.
Undervaluing the risk of reporting entities; mislead to critical investment
decision.
Introduction(Cont)
Disclosure of financial instruments (i.e. derivatives) by business
entities in Malaysia is entrusted under three separate financial reporting
standards.(i.e. MFRS 7,132,139)
To improve disclosure on financial instruments-faithful represent to the
users of financial statements comprehensive and far reaching additional
requirement as compared to previous accounting standard
The requirements for hedging activities are included in two of the
standards-MFRS 139 and MFRS 7.
International studies showed that disclosure of derivatives and hedging
activities in annual report is varied, incomplete and inconsistent:
Cannot be relied by users(especially investors) to make favorable decision( e.g.
Wood and Marginson 2004; Birt et. al 2013)
Accounting standard offer discretion for management to manipulate information. (
e.g. Hassan et al. 2006).
Introduction(Cont) Previous studies also explained several reasons (factors) that associate on
variation of disclosure on financial instruments
Firms characteristics
The strength of corporate governance
The existence of RMC and Audit committee (e.g Birt et al. 2013; Hassan et al.
2012)
However, it is argued that those evidences is weak to be generalized.
Different organizational culture, current economic development, ownership
structure and regulations (Ball and Shivakumar 2005)
Examine the extent of derivatives disclosure based on specific industries(e.g.
financial services industries, banks, extractives industries)
Mixed evidence.
Problem Statement
Quality of hedging activities information in company annual
report still not conclusive in Malaysia.
Norkhairul Hafiz (2003),Hassan et. al (2010),Hassan et al. (2012), Abdullah
and Chen, (2010). Unsatisfactory disclosures; some companies not
forthcoming to report derivatives and hedging activities information.
(Hassan et al 2012)
Company size, company liquidity and the existence of risk management
committee are factors that contribute for high disclosure
Outdated evidence- as new accounting standard has been introduced
Poor disclosures and non-compliance would affect users of
financial statements to make unfavorable investment decision.
Problem Statement (Cont) There was no clear evidence whether the monitoring control (i.e
RMC) is the optimal means of dealing with the disclosure
practice.
Previous studies proposed that RMC could influence the level
of transparency and quality of disclosure on financial instrument
(Hassan et al. 2012; Abdullah and Chen 2010; Birt et al. 2013)-
Mixed evidence
Hence, the existence of the RMC alone can be argued as
insufficient to explain the level and quality of financial
instrument disclosure-lead this study to deal with the
characteristics of RMC.
Research Question
What are the characteristics of the RMC that
influence the extent of information on hedging
activities disclosure in Malaysian listed companies?
ObjectiveTo determine the relationship between RMC’s characteristics and the extent of
information on hedging activities disclosure of the Malaysian listed companies.
Literature review Studies on disclosure of hedging activities information
Lack of studies- only few studies have specifically addressed the disclosure of
information on hedging activities.
The extent of disclosures were reported less satisfactory (e.g. Birt et al 2013,
Chalmer and Godfrey 2004)
Factors associated with disclosure of financial instruments
Firm characteristics and corporate governance mechanisms
Studies on financial instruments disclosure in Malaysia
Hassan et al., (2012)
Abdullah and Chen, (2010)
Norkhairul Hafiz, (2003)
Ismail and Abdul Rahman, (2011)
Adznan and Puat Nelson (2014)
Methodology Measurement(Dependent Variable)
This study measure the dependent variable (EHAD) based on the
disclosure score.
Disclosure checklist is developed based two types of disclosures, i.e.,
mandatory and discretionary. (28 items) The score of 1 for each dimension of hedging activities disclosure will be assigned in the
EHAD index if it is disclosed in the annual report or 0 otherwise
Formula used to measure the disclosure level of hedging activities
information:
Methodology (Cont) Data and Sample Selection
This study use secondary data collected from two separate sources:
DataStream and the Malaysian listed companies’ annual reports.
The population setting for this study is all public listed companies on the
Main Market of Bursa Malaysia except the financial services sector
companies.
300 large companies, listed in 2013 are selected based on their total
assets as a sample for this study.
large companies is found most likely to engage in derivatives usage(Hassan et al.
2012,Ammer et al. 2011)
However, we ended up with 117 companies since not all the sampled companies
use derivatives to mitigate their financial risk exposure and establish an RMC.
Year 2013 is the third year of MFRS 7 has been fully adopted-sufficient time.
Conclusion The objective of this study is to examine the influence of risk
management committee characteristics (i.e. RMC size, RMC
independence, RMC meeting, RMC gender diversity and RMC
training) to the extent of hedging activities information
disclosures in the annual reports of Malaysian listed companies.
The analysis shows that the RMC characteristics (i.e. RINDE,
RMEET) have some significant bearing in influencing the extent of
hedging activities information disclosure in Malaysia
Intrinsically, this finding may provide some meaningful insights to the
regulator, policy makers and researchers, especially in incorporating RMCs
as part of the corporate governance mechanisms.
It is not just the existence of RMC, but their effectiveness is something that
needs to be emphasized.
Top Related