RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 1
Steven Bluskfor
the BTeV Collaboration
Design of the BTeV RICH and its
Expected Performance
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 2
The BTeV Collaboration
Belarussian State- D .Drobychev, A. Lobko, A. Lopatrik, R. Zouversky
UC Davis - J. Link, P. Yager
Univ. of Colorado at BoulderJ. Cumalat
Fermi National Lab J. Appel, E. Barsotti, CN Brown, J. Butler, H. Cheung, G. Chiodini, D. Christian, S. Cihangir, I. Gaines, P. Garbincius, L. Garren, E. Gottschalk, A. Hahn, G. Jackson, P. Kasper, P. Kasper, R. Kutschke, SW Kwan, P. Lebrun, P. McBride, L. Stutte, M. Votava, M. Wang,J. Yarba
Univ. of Florida at Gainesville P. Avery
University of Houston K. Lau, B. W. Mayes, J. Pyrlik, V. Rodriguez, S. Subramania
Illinois Institute of TechnologyRA Burnstein, DM Kaplan, LM Lederman, HA Rubin, C. White
Univ. of Illinois- M. Haney, D. Kim, M. Selen, J. Wiss
Indiana University RW Gardner, DR Rust
Univ. of Insubria in Como-P. Ratcliffe, M. Rovere
INFN - Frascati- M. Bertani,L. Benussi, S. Bianco, M. Caponero,F. Fabri, F. Felli, M. Giardoni, A. La Monaca, E. Pace, M. Pallota,A. Paolozzi, A. Scicutelli
INFN - Milano – G. Alimonti,M. Citterio, P. D’Angelo, S. Magni,D. Menasce, L. Moroni, D. Pedrini,M. Pirola, S. Sala, L. Uplegger
INFN - Pavia - G. Boca, G. Cossail, E. Degliantoni, PF Manfredi, M. Manghisoni, M. Marengo, L. Ratti, V. Re,V. Speziali, G. Traversi
INFN - Torino N. Cartiglia, R. Cester,F. Marchetto, R. Mussa, N. Pastrone
IHEP Protvino, Russia A. Derevschikov, Y. Goncharenko,V. Khodyrev, A. Meschanin,
L. Nogach, K. Shestermanov,L. Soloviev, A. Vasiliev University of Iowa C. Newsom, R. Braunger
University of Minnesota V. V. Frolov, Y. Kubota, R. Poling, A. Smith Nanjing Univ. (China) T. Y. Chen, D. Gao, S. Du, M. Qi, BP. Zhang, JW Zhao Ohio State University K. Honscheid, & H. Kagan Univ. of Pennsylvania W. Selove Univ. of Puerto Rico A. Lopez, & W. Xiong Univ. of Science & Tech. of China - G. Datao, L. Hao, Ge Jin, L. Tiankuan, T. Yang, XQ Yu
Shandong Univ. (China) CF Feng, Yu Fu, Mao He, JY Li, L. Xue, N. Zhang, & XY Zhang
Southern Methodist University - T. Coan
SUNY Albany - M. Alam
Syracuse University
M. Artuso, C. Boulahouache,
O. Dorjkhaidav
K. Khroustalev, R.Mountain, R. Nandakumar, T. Skwarnicki, S. Stone, JC Wang, H. Zhao Univ. of Tennessee K. Cho, T. Handler,
R. Mitchell Tufts Univ. – A. Napier
Vanderbilt University W. Johns, P. Sheldon,
K. Stenson, E. Vaandering, M. Webster Wayne State University G. Bonvicini, D. Cinabro University of Wisconsin M. Sheaff
Yale University J. Slaughter York University S. Menary
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 3
Physics of BTeV
BTeV will vastly improve the constraints on the CKM anglesby making precision measurements of both the sides andthe angles over-constrain ().
Measurements and searches for rare and SM forbiddendecays “Beyond the SM” Physics.
B factories will provide valuable input on sin(2) and Vub,but they cannot compete with a hadron collider on measuring, and searches for new physics (even by 2007).
- They don’t produce BS
- (bb) is ~10,000X larger at the Tevatron than at (4S)
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 4
B Production at the Tevatron
b production angle
b production angle
The higher momentum b are at larger
Pseudo-rapidity
b production peaks at large angles with large bb correlation
b cross section ~ 100 b at 2 TeV 2x1011 b’s per 107 sec at L=2x1032 cm-2 s-1.b cross section ~ 100 b at 2 TeV 2x1011 b’s per 107 sec at L=2x1032 cm-2 s-1.
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 5
B Physics Detector “Wish List”
Detector Property
Precision 3D Tracking
Excellent Particle ID(K, , p, e, )
Excellent calorimetry
Detached Vertex trigger at lowest level trigger
BTeV
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 7
RICH Specifications
Momentum Range of Interest
* p > 2-3 GeV for CP tagging * p < 70 GeV clean separation of 2-body modes: B, K, KK.
Minimize material in front of ECAL
Longitudinal space available ~3 meters
Desirable to detect Cerenkov photons in the visible range (minimize chromatic error, less sensitive to contaminants, etc)
Well-suited for a Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector
Tagging kaons in BTeV Acc.
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 8
Radiators
Large momentum coverage requires a low index of refraction
gas radiator
We chose C4F10 because:* heaviest gas which has high transparency in the visible * wide usage in other HEP expt’s (e.g. Delphi, HERA-B, HERMES, LHC-b).
For momenta below 9.5 GeV/c neither K nor P radiate in C4F10
Separate liquid radiator for K/P separation below 9.5 GeV/c
Large momentum coverage requires a low index of refraction
gas radiator
We chose C4F10 because:* heaviest gas which has high transparency in the visible * wide usage in other HEP expt’s (e.g. Delphi, HERA-B, HERMES, LHC-b).
For momenta below 9.5 GeV/c neither K nor P radiate in C4F10
Separate liquid radiator for K/P separation below 9.5 GeV/c
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 9
The BTeV RICH
Arrays of163-channel
HPDs(~1000 in total)
PMT Arrays(~5,000 in total)
Sphericalmirrors
C5F12
Liquid Radiator
C4F10 gasvolume
Photons from gasare reflected offmirrors and focused at the HPD plane.
Photons from liquidare directly detected inthe PMTs.
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 10
Photon Angles
Track fromInteraction
HPDArray
PMTArray
Liquid radiator photons are detectedin PMT array.
Liquid radiator photons are detectedin PMT array.
LiquidRadiator
Gas RadiatorVolume
Gas radiator photons are
detectedin HPD array.
Gas radiator photons are
detectedin HPD array.
Mirror
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 11
Gas Radiator
Gas: C4F10 (n=1.00138): * K/ separation for 3 < p <70 GeV * P/K separation for 9.5 < p < 70 GeVc() ~ 0.43 mrad @ 70 GeV
Must keep C)/trk < 0.13 mrad
N() detected ~ 65 (simulation)
Total uncertainty per photon must be kept below ~1 mrad.
Requires ~1.5 mm segmentation
Well-suited for HPDs
No P/K separationbelow ~ 9.5 GeV with
gas alone
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 12
Detecting Gas Photonswith HPDs
* See talk by Ray Mountain
Started with 61-channel HPD that LHC-band DEP developed. We worked with DEP to develop 163-ch version|which would meet BTeV’s requirements.
Cross-focused onto hexagonal pixels Signal: ~5000 e- in Silicon.
Readout system is being developed by Syracuse in collaboration with IDE AS Norway.
HPD
e
163 channels~1.5 mm
-20 kV
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 13
HPD Hexad
Mu-metalshield
Readout Boardsare mounted here HPD
VA_BTEVASICs
(AS&D)
Full HPDArray
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 14
HPD Readout
VA_BTeV ASIC being developed in collaboration with IDE AS Norway(independent from HPD development)
Initial tests indicate that ~500 e-
noise level be achieved.
Threshold for each channel is adjustable.
Readout is binary (ON or OFF)
Testing of first prototypes is underwayat Syracuse. HPD Readout
Board
VA_BTeVchip
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 15
More on HPD Readout
Discharge of FE chip requires 2 beam crossings, so a hit channel is dead for the next crossing.
Simulated effect @ L=2x1032 cm-2 s-1. Find <10% loss of photons even in the busiest regions.(Much smaller elsewhere)
HPD#Y
HPD#X
Number of hit channels in consecutive beam crossings
per 163 channels
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 16
Liquid Radiator
C5F12 (n=1.24): * Extends P/K separation to p<9.5 GeV * Extends K/ separation into the p<3 GeV range
c() ~ 5.3 mrad @ 9 GeV
Must keep C)/trk<1.7 mrad
N() detected ~ 15 (simulation)
Total uncertainty per photon must be kept below ~7 mrad
Separate PMT system (3” PMT is acceptable)
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 17
Detecting Liquid Photons -- PMTs
Expect to use 3” tubes. Shielding necessary ( |B| < 15 G in PMT region)
Expect (
c) ~ 6 mrad, N(~15/trk (trk
c) ~ 1.6 mrad
PMT Layout in BTeV
Mu-metalshields
3”
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 18
Magnetic Shielding of PMTs
Unshielded
Unshielded
B Trans.PMTs from 4 different manufacturers
4.0
12.0 45.0
45.0
Shielded
Shielded
B Long.
Bmax=15 G
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 20
Liquid Radiator Conceptual Design
1 cm of C5F12
3 mm Carbon Fiber front window & 3 mm quartz back window
Split into 5 volumes to reduce pressure.
Structure is reinforced by CF posts
Total Material Budget: X0 ~ 8.7%
Simulations indicate negligible impact on 0 reconstruction since electrons from conversions are only in a very weak magnetic field.
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 21
Progress with Mirrors Measurements being taken on the test bench of the TA2 group at CERN. Several mirrors under study
COMPAS: glass, glass+foam back., CMA: Carbon fiber
Initial tests show that they meet spot size spec.
Rcurv=660 cm
Work being done byINFN Torino group
~60 cm
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 22
Expected Performance
from Simulations
Expected Performance
from Simulations
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 23
Efficiency vs Fake Rate
Clean separationof B from BK and BKK
For example:(B ): 80%
K Rejection ~ 95% KK Rejection > 99% The latter is importantbecause BsKK lieson top of B signal
B Simulationw/ 2 minimum biasevents.
Gas Radiator & HPDs
K+-
K+K-
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 24
Low Momentum K/P separation using Liquid
Radiator & PMTs
K and P cannot be separatedbelow 9.5 GeV/c in gas system.
Our simulations showed that we could improve D2 by ~25% for BS and ~10%for B0 using liquid radiator.
Mom. < 9 GeV/c
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 25
Expectations for D2
BS
CP side
Recoilingb-hadron
K+
Away-side tags
K–, -, e-, p, jet charge
Same-side particle tag
K+
S
tag
B
N
N
corr incorrtag tag
corr incorrtag tag
N N
N N
D =
Error on CP Asymmetry
21/CPA DTag Type
D2
SAway Side Kaon
Tag 6.0% 5.8 %
Same Side Kaon (Pion) Tag 1.1% 4.5%
Away Side Muon Tag 0.8% 1.3%
Jet Charge 1.4% 0.4%
Total 9.2 % 12.1 %
BTeV Expected
10 % 13 %
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 26
Test Beam – May 2003
ConcreteSupport Blocks
HPDEnclosure
MirrorAssembly
FrontEntrance Window
~15 HPDs to coverfull Cerenkov ring
~100 GeV beam
Will measure:
* resolution on Cerenkov angle * photon yield
We’ll also scan themirror to checksensitivity
Construction underway.
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 27
Summary
The BTeV RICH uses : gas system: C4F10 gas and HPDs, and liquid system: C5F12 and PMTs
to achieve excellent K/P separation for all relevant momenta less than 70 GeV/c.
Recent addition of the liquid radiator system will improve D2 for CP tag by ~25% for BS and ~10% for B0.
Initial tests of HPDs/PMTs look encouraging (see talk by R. Mountain)
Test beam next year to validate detector design and simulations.
RICH 2002, Pylos, Greece 28
Why did we punt on
Aerogel?Both gas & aerogel photons were detected in the HPDs
After removing photons which were consistent with more than 1 track, aerogelprovided essentially no K/P separation
The aerogel rings have too few photonsto compete with the bright gas rings
Low mult. event
High mult. event
Top Related