Download - Quality Management

Transcript
Page 1: Quality Management

Quality Management

25-11-2010

Page 2: Quality Management

Definition of Quality

• Conformance to the requirement – Phillip Crosby

• A predictable degree of uniformity and dependability at low cost and suited to the market – W. Edward Deming

• Fitness for use (Satisfies customer’s need) – Joseph M. Juran

Page 3: Quality Management

• Fundamental to any quality program is the determination of quality specification and the cost of achieving those specifications.

• The quality specification of a product or service derive from decision and actions made relative to the quality of its design and the quality of its conformance to that design.

• Design Quality- It refers to the inherent value of the product in its market place and thus strategic decision for the firm.

• Conformance Quality- It refers to the degree to which the product or service design specification met.

Page 4: Quality Management

Dimensions of Quality

• Performance

• Features

• Reliability/Durability

• Serviceability

• Aesthetics

• Perceived Quality

Page 5: Quality Management

Phases of Quality Assurance

Acceptancesampling

Processcontrol

Continuousimprovement

Inspection of lotsbefore/afterproduction

Inspection andcorrective

action duringproduction

Quality builtinto theprocess

The leastprogressive

The mostprogressive

Page 6: Quality Management

Inspection

• How Much/How Often

• Where/When

• Centralized vs. On-site

Inputs Transformation Outputs

Acceptancesampling

Processcontrol

Acceptancesampling

Page 7: Quality Management

Co

st

OptimalAmount of Inspection

Inspection Costs

Cost of inspection

Cost of passingdefectives

Total Cost

Page 8: Quality Management

Where to Inspect in the Process

• Raw materials and purchased parts

• Finished products

• Before a costly operation

• Before an irreversible process

• Before a covering process

Page 9: Quality Management

Examples of Inspection PointsType ofbusiness

Inspectionpoints

Characteristics

Fast Food CashierCounter areaEating areaBuildingKitchen

AccuracyAppearance, productivityCleanlinessAppearanceHealth regulations

Hotel/motel Parking lotAccountingBuildingMain desk

Safe, well lightedAccuracy, timelinessAppearance, safetyWaiting times

Supermarket CashiersDeliveries

Accuracy, courtesyQuality, quantity

Page 10: Quality Management

• Statistical Process Control: Statistical evaluation of the output of a process during production

• Quality of Conformance:A product or service conforms to specifications

Statistical Control

Page 11: Quality Management

Control Chart

• Control Chart

– Purpose: to monitor process output to see if it is random

– A time ordered plot representative sample statistics obtained from an on going process (e.g. sample means)

– Upper and lower control limits define the range of acceptable variation

Page 12: Quality Management

Control Chart

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

UCL

LCL

Sample number

Mean

Out ofcontrol

Normal variationdue to chance

Abnormal variationdue to assignable sources

Abnormal variationdue to assignable sources

Page 13: Quality Management

Statistical Process Control• The essence of statistical process

control is to assure that the output of a process is random so that future output will be random.

Page 14: Quality Management

Statistical Process Control

• The Control Process– Define– Measure– Compare– Evaluate– Correct– Monitor results

Page 15: Quality Management

Statistical Process Control

• Variations and Control– Random variation: Natural variations in

the output of a process, created by countless minor factors

– Assignable variation: A variation whose source can be identified

Page 16: Quality Management

Sampling Distribution

Samplingdistribution

Processdistribution

Mean

Page 17: Quality Management

Normal Distribution

Mean

95.44%

99.74%

Standard deviation

Page 18: Quality Management

Control LimitsSamplingdistribution

Processdistribution

Mean

Lowercontrol

limit

Uppercontrol

limit

Page 19: Quality Management

SPC Errors

• Type I error– Concluding a process is not in control

when it actually is.

• Type II error– Concluding a process is in control when it

is not.

Page 20: Quality Management

Type I and Type II Errors

In control Out of control

In control No Error Type I error

(producers risk)

Out of control

Type II Error

(consumers risk)

No error

Page 21: Quality Management

Type I Error

Mean

LCL UCL

/2 /2

Probabilityof Type I error

Page 22: Quality Management

Observations from Sample Distribution

Sample number

UCL

LCL

1 2 3 4

Page 23: Quality Management

Control Charts for Variables

• Mean control charts

– Used to monitor the central tendency of a process.

– X bar charts

• Range control charts

– Used to monitor the process dispersion

– R charts

Variables generate data that are Variables generate data that are measuredmeasured..

Page 24: Quality Management

Mean and Range Charts

UCL

LCL

UCL

LCL

R-chart

x-Chart Detects shift

Does notdetect shift

(process mean is shifting upward)

SamplingDistribution

Page 25: Quality Management

x-Chart

UCL

Does notreveal increase

Mean and Range Charts

UCL

LCL

LCL

R-chart Reveals increase

(process variability is increasing)SamplingDistribution

Page 26: Quality Management

Control Chart for Attributes

• p-Chart - Control chart used to monitor the proportion of defectives in a process

• c-Chart - Control chart used to monitor the number of defects per unit

Attributes generate data that are Attributes generate data that are countedcounted..

Page 27: Quality Management

Use of p-Charts

• When observations can be placed into two categories.– Good or bad

– Pass or fail

– Operate or don’t operate

• When the data consists of multiple samples of several observations each

Page 28: Quality Management

Use of c-Charts

• Use only when the number of occurrences per unit of measure can be counted; non-occurrences cannot be counted.– Scratches, chips, dents, or errors per item– Cracks or faults per unit of distance– Breaks or Tears per unit of area– Bacteria or pollutants per unit of volume– Calls, complaints, failures per unit of time

Page 29: Quality Management

Use of Control Charts• At what point in the process to use

control charts

• What size samples to take

• What type of control chart to use

– Variables

– Attributes

Page 30: Quality Management

Run Tests• Run test – a test for randomness

• Any sort of pattern in the data would suggest a non-random process

• All points are within the control limits - the process may not be random

Page 31: Quality Management

Nonrandom Patterns in Control charts

• Trend

• Cycles

• Bias

• Mean shift

• Too much dispersion

Page 32: Quality Management

Counting Above/Below Median Runs (7 runs)

Counting Up/Down Runs (8 runs)

U U D U D U D U U D

B A A B A B B B A A B

Counting RunsCounting Runs

Page 33: Quality Management

NonRandom Variation

• Managers should have response plans to investigate cause

• May be false alarm (Type I error)

• May be assignable variation

Page 34: Quality Management

• Tolerances or specifications

– Range of acceptable values established by engineering design or customer requirements

• Process variability

– Natural variability in a process

• Process capability

– Process variability relative to specification

Process Capability

Page 35: Quality Management

Process CapabilityLowerSpecification

UpperSpecification

A. Process variability matches specifications

LowerSpecification

UpperSpecification

B. Process variability well within specifications

LowerSpecification

UpperSpecification

C. Process variability exceeds specifications

Page 36: Quality Management

Process Capability Ratio

Process capability ratio, Cp = specification widthprocess width

Upper specification – lower specification6

Cp =

3

X-UTLor

3

LTLXmin=C pk

If the process is centered use Cp

If the process is not centered use Cpk

Page 37: Quality Management

Limitations of Capability Indexes1. Process may not be stable

2. Process output may not be normally distributed

3. Process not centered but Cp is used

Page 38: Quality Management

Example 8

Machine

Standard Deviation

Machine Capabilit

yCp

A 0.13 0.78 0.80/0.78 = 1.03

B 0.08 0.48 0.80/0.48 = 1.67

C 0.16 0.96 0.80/0.96 = 0.83

Cp > 1.33 is desirableCp = 1.00 process is barely capableCp < 1.00 process is not capable

Page 39: Quality Management

Processmean

Lowerspecification

Upperspecification

1350 ppm 1350 ppm

1.7 ppm 1.7 ppm

+/- 3 Sigma

+/- 6 Sigma

3 Sigma and 6 Sigma Quality3 Sigma and 6 Sigma Quality

Page 40: Quality Management

Improving Process Capability• Simplify

• Standardize

• Mistake-proof

• Upgrade equipment

• Automate

Page 41: Quality Management

Taguchi Loss Function

Cost

TargetLowerspec

Upperspec

Traditionalcost function

Taguchicost function